A prospective randomized trial of FK506 versus cyclosporine after human pulmonary transplantation

Current Status of Genetically Engineered Pig to Monkey Kidney Xenotransplantation in Korea

BACKGROUND

In South Korea, pig-to-nonhuman primate trials of solid organs have only been performed recently, and the results are not sufficiently satisfactory to initiate clinical trials. Since November 2011, we have performed 30 kidney pig-to-nonhuman primate xenotransplantations at Konkuk University Hospital.

METHODS

Donor αGal-knockout-based transgenic pigs were obtained from 3 institutes. The knock-in genes were CD39, CD46, CD55, CD73, and thrombomodulin, and 2-4 transgenic modifications with GTKO were done. The recipient animal was the cynomolgus monkey. We used the immunosuppressants anti-CD154, rituximab, anti-thymocyte globulin, tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil, and steroids.

RESULTS

The mean survival duration of the recipients was 39 days. Except for a few cases for which survival durations were <2 days because of technical failure, 24 grafts survived for >7 days, with an average survival duration of 50 days. Long-term survival was observed 115 days after the removal of the contralateral kidney, which is currently the longest-recorded graft survival in Korea. We confirmed functioning grafts for the surviving transplanted kidneys after the second-look operation, and no signs of hyperacute rejection were observed.

CONCLUSIONS

Although our survival results are relatively poor, they are the best-recorded results in South Korea, and the ongoing results are improving. With the support of government funds and the volunteering activities of clinical experts, we aim to further improve our experiments and contribute to the commencement of clinical trials of kidney xenotransplantation in Korea.

Current status of xenotransplantation research and the strategies for preventing xenograft rejection

Transplantation is often the last resort for end-stage organ failures, e.g., kidney, liver, heart, lung, and pancreas. The shortage of donor organs is the main limiting factor for successful transplantation in humans. Except living donations, other alternatives are needed, e.g., xenotransplantation of pig organs. However, immune rejection remains the major challenge to overcome in xenotransplantation. There are three different xenogeneic types of rejections, based on the responses and mechanisms involved. It includes hyperacute rejection (HAR), delayed xenograft rejection (DXR) and chronic rejection. DXR, sometimes involves acute humoral xenograft rejection (AHR) and cellular xenograft rejection (CXR), which cannot be strictly distinguished from each other in pathological process. In this review, we comprehensively discussed the mechanism of these immunological rejections and summarized the strategies for preventing them, such as generation of gene knock out donors by different genome editing tools and the use of immunosuppressive regimens. We also addressed organ-specific barriers and challenges needed to pave the way for clinical xenotransplantation. Taken together, this information will benefit the current immunological research in the field of xenotransplantation.

Pharmacokinetics of inhaled nanotherapeutics for pulmonary delivery

Pulmonary delivery of lipid-based nanotherapeutics by inhalation presents an advantageous alternative to oral and intravenous routes of administration that avoids enzymatic degradation in gastrointestinal tract and hepatic first pass metabolism and also limits off-target adverse side effects upon heathy tissues. For lung-related indications, inhalation provides localized delivery in order to enhance therapeutic efficacy at the site of action. Optimization of physicochemical properties, selected drug and inhalation format can greatly influence the pharmacokinetic behavior of inhaled nanoparticle systems and their payloads. The present review analyzes a wide range of nanoparticle systems, their formulations and consequent effect on pharmacokinetic distribution of delivered active components after inhalation.

Bradycardia caused by interaction of venlafaxine and cyclosporine: A case report

Background:

Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) and serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors (SNRIs) are prescribed widely for the treatment of depression, anxiety disorders and other psychiatric disorders. Although antidepressants are considered as a safety drug category but unexpected cardiovascular events have been reported as the most serious complications. The aim of this study was to introduce a case presentation on bradycardia due to the drug interference of venlafaxine and cyclosporine.

Case presentation:

The patient was a 38-year old woman diagnosed with systemic lupus erythematosus 5 years ago, who was admitted to a general educational hospital in northern Iran due to intensified rheumatologic symptoms and complaining about abdominal pain. Cyclosporine tab were administered to the patient, 50 mg twice daily. Two weeks after the administration of cyclosporine, the level of blood cyclosporine was checked. The patient became bradycardic after starting a single dose of venlafaxine (heart rate 52 ppm). Cardiac assessment showed no reason for bradycardia and it subsided after a drop of venlafaxine.

Conclusion:

As a result of the potential adverse drug interactions between cyclosporine and antidepressants such as venlafaxine, physicians should be aware of the possibility of bradycardia in the simultaneous prescription of these drugs in cases.

Observation of topical tacrolimus on high-risk penetrating keratoplasty patients: a randomized clinical trial study

Background/Objectives

To evaluate the clinical efficacy of topical tacrolimus 0.1% and cyclosporine 1% on high-risk penetrating keratoplasty (PKP) patients.

Subjects/Methods

A series of 49 high-risk PKP patients (49 eyes), 20 males, 29 females from the age of 4 months to 74 years of age with the mean of 32.5 from 2012 to 2017 were recruited in this study. The patients were randomly divided into two groups by receiving either topical tacrolimus 0.1% or cyclosporine 1% respectively. Twenty five patients were treated with topical tacrolimus 0.1% and 24 patients with topical cyclosporine 1%. The traditional baseline management on these two groups were Tobramycin and Dexamethasone eye drops in the first 3 weeks and then tapered off. Clinical procedures and postoperative follow-up were documented.

Results

After 6–54 months follow-up, with the average of 24 months, 11 of 24 high-risk patients (11 eyes) had graft rejection, the rejection rate was 45.8% in topical cyclosporine 1% group. The rejections occurred from 35 days to 20 months after PKP. Three patients had irreversible rejection. On topical tacrolimus 0.1% group, the rejection occurred in four patients (four eyes) with rejection rate of 16%, and no irreversible rejection was observed. The graft rejection episodes were documented between 23 days and 24 months. As compared with the topical cyclosporine 1%, topical tacrolimus 0.1%, a key immunosuppressant, significantly decreased corneal graft rejection rate (p = 0.02).

Conclusions

Topical tacrolimus 01% on high-risk PKP patients significantly prevented corneal graft rejection, and it had less adverse effects and was very safe to high-risk patients as to topical cyclosporine 1%. Further case controlled randomized clinical trial studies are needed to establish the best management option for these high-risk patients.

Systemic Immunomodulatory Strategies in High-risk Corneal Transplantation

The cornea is the most commonly transplanted tissue in the body. Although corneal grafts generally have high success rates, transplantation onto inflamed and vascularized host beds, or so-called high-risk corneal transplantation, has a high rate of graft rejection. The management of this high-risk corneal transplantation is challenging and involves numerous measures. One of the key measures to prevent graft rejection in these cases is the use of systemic immunosuppressive agents. In this article, we will review the systemic immunosuppressive agents most commonly used for high-risk corneal transplantation, which include corticosteroids, cysclosporine A, tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil, and rapamycin. Benefits, risks, and published data on the use of these medications for high-risk corneal transplantation will be detailed. We will also summarize novel immunoregulatory approaches that may be used to prevent graft rejection in high-risk corneal transplantation.

Tacrolimus in Dermatology

Background:

Tacrolimus (FK 506), a metabolite of the fungus Streptomyces tsukubaensis, is an anti-T-cell drug. It acts by inhibiting the production of IL-2, IL-3, IL-4, TNFα, and GM-CSF. More potent and with slightly less secondary effects than cyclosporine, it has been the object of considerable interest, especially in conditions that could benefit from the latter.

Objective:

In psoriasis, a placebo-controlled double-blind study has shown oral tacrolimus at 0.1 mg/kg/day to be effective in controlling recalcitrant lesions. In human, small studies have reported tacrolimus ointment to be effective in controlling acute contact dermatitis. Short-term trials of topical tacrolimus in the treatment of atopic dermatitis have recently shown excellent results in both adults and children. In animal studies of hair growth disorders, topical tacrolimus induces anagen and protects from chemotherapy-induced alopecia. Animal studies with the ointment for the prevention of skin graft rejection, lupus dermatoses, and skin papilloma formation have also shown to be promising.

Conclusions:

There are case reports of pyoderma gangrenosum, Sezary's syndrome, and Behçet's disease successfully treated with oral tacrolimus but, because of their small number, they remain anecdotal at this point.

Pharmacokinetics and Toxicity of Tacrolimus Early After Heart and Lung Transplantation

Annually, about 8000 heart and lung transplantations are successfully performed worldwide. However, morbidity and mortality still pose a major concern. Renal failure in heart and lung transplant recipients is an essential adverse cause of morbidity and mortality, often originating in the early postoperative phase. At this time of clinical instability, the kidneys are exposed to numerous nephrotoxic stimuli. Among these, tacrolimus toxicity plays an important role, and its pharmacokinetics may be significantly altered in this critical phase by fluctuating drug absorption, changed protein metabolism, anemia and (multi-) organ failure. Limited understanding of tacrolimus pharmacokinetics in these circumstances is hampering daily practice. Tacrolimus dose adjustments are generally based on whole blood trough levels, which widely vary early after transplantation. Moreover, whole blood trough levels are difficult to predict and are poorly related to the area under the concentration-time curve. Even within the therapeutic range, toxicity may occur. These shortcomings of tacrolimus monitoring may not hold for the unbound tacrolimus plasma concentrations, which may better reflect tacrolimus toxicity. This review focuses on posttransplant tacrolimus pharmacokinetics, discusses relevant factors influencing the unbound tacrolimus concentrations and tacrolimus (nephro-) toxicity in heart and lung transplantation patients.

Immunosuppression in lung transplantation

Lung transplantation can be a life-saving procedure for those with end-stage lung diseases. Unfortunately, long term graft and patient survival are limited by both acute and chronic allograft rejection, with a median survival of just over 6 years. Immunosuppressive regimens are employed to reduce the rate of rejection, and while protocols vary from center to center, conventional maintenance therapy consists of triple drug therapy with a calcineurin inhibitor (cyclosporine or tacrolimus), antiproliferative agents [azathioprine (AZA), mycophenolate, sirolimus (srl), everolimus (evl)], and corticosteroids (CS). Roughly 50% of lung transplant centers also utilize induction therapy, with polyclonal antibody preparations [equine or rabbit anti-thymocyte globulin (ATG)], interleukin 2 receptor antagonists (IL2RAs) (daclizumab or basiliximab), or alemtuzumab. This review summarizes these agents and the data surrounding their use in lung transplantation, as well as additional common and novel therapies in lung transplantation. Despite the progression of the management of lung transplant recipients, they continue to be at high risk of treatment-related complications, and poor graft and patient survival. Randomized clinical trials are needed to allow for the development of better agents, regimens and techniques to address above mentioned issues and reduce morbidity and mortality among lung transplant recipients.

Immunosuppression and allograft rejection following lung transplantation: evidence to date

The enduring success of lung transplantation is built on the use of immunosuppressive drugs to stop the immune system from rejecting the newly transplanted lung allograft. Most patients receive a triple-drug maintenance immunosuppressive regimen consisting of a calcineurin inhibitor, an antiproliferative and corticosteroids. Induction therapy with either an antilymphocyte monoclonal or an interleukin-2 receptor antagonist are prescribed by many centres aiming to achieve rapid inhibition of recently activated and potentially alloreactive T lymphocytes. Despite this generic approach acute rejection episodes remain common, mandating further fine-tuning and augmentation of the immunosuppressive regimen. While there has been a trend away from cyclosporine and azathioprine towards a preference for tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil, this has not translated into significant protection from the development of chronic lung allograft dysfunction, the main barrier to the long-term success of lung transplantation. This article reviews the problem of lung allograft rejection and the evidence for immunosuppressive regimens used both in the short- and long-term in patients undergoing lung transplantation.

In vitro and in vivo release characteristics of Tacrolimus (FK506) from an episcleral drug-delivery implant

PURPOSE

To investigate the in vitro and in vivo release characteristics of Tacrolimus (FK506) from an episcleral drug-delivery implant.

METHODS

For in vitro experiments, Tacrolimus-loaded implants (0.5 mL; at concentrations of 0.25, 0.5, and 1.0 mg/mL) were immersed in a balanced salt solution. Samples of the surrounding liquid were aspirated at different times over a 96-h period. For in vivo experiments, the experimental group received an implant loaded with Tacrolimus (0.5 mg/mL; 0.5 mL); the control group was given a subconjunctival injection of 0.5 mL Tacrolimus (0.5 mg/mL). On postoperative days 3, 7, 14, 28, and 56, 3 animals were sacrificed, and their eyes were enucleated. Tacrolimus concentrations were determined by liquid chromatographic-tandem mass spectrometry. Ocular toxicity was evaluated by slit-lamp photography, fundus photography, intraocular pressure (IOP), and histology.

RESULTS

The implants released Tacrolimus in a biphasic pattern for 96 h in the in vitro study. The release kinetics were not dependent on the drug concentrations. The in vivo study showed statistically significant differences between the 2 treatment groups. Tacrolimus levels were particularly high in the conjunctiva, iris, ciliary body, cornea, sclera, choroid, and retina in the experimental group, while concentrations were low and only lasted for 1 week in the controls. Slit-lamp photography, fundus photography, IOP, and histology showed no evidence of toxic effects.

CONCLUSIONS

The episcleral drug-delivery implant mechanically released Tacrolimus through the apertures of capsules and, consequently, may be a promising drug vehicle for the treatment of immune-mediated ocular disorders.

Tacrolimus versus cyclosporin as primary immunosuppression for lung transplant recipients

BACKGROUND

Lung transplantation is a well-accepted treatment for people with most end-stage lung diseases. Although both tacrolimus and cyclosporin are used as primary immunosuppressive agents in lung transplant recipients, it is unclear which of these drugs is better in reducing rejection and death without causing adverse effects.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the benefits and harms of tacrolimus versus cyclosporin for primary immunosuppression in lung transplant recipients.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Renal Group's Specialised Register to 10 April 2013 through contact with the Trials Search Co-ordinator using search terms relevant to this review. We also searched Science Citation Index Expanded and the Transplant Library to 20 April 2013.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included all randomised controlled trials (RCT) that compared any dose and duration of administration of tacrolimus versus cyclosporin as primary immunosuppressive treatment in lung transplant recipients. Our selection criteria required that all included patients received the same additional immunosuppressive therapy within each study.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Three authors extracted data. For dichotomous data we used risk ratio (RR) and used mean difference (MD) for continuous data, each with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Methodological components of the included studies were used to assess risk of systematic errors (bias). Trial sequential analysis was used to assess risk of random errors (play of chance).

MAIN RESULTS

We included three studies that enrolled a total of 413 adult patients that compared tacrolimus with microemulsion or oral solution cyclosporin. All studies were found to be at high risk of bias. Tacrolimus seemed to be significantly superior to cyclosporin regarding the incidence of bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome (RR 0.46, 95% CI 0.29 to 0.74), lymphocytic bronchitis score (MD -0.60, 95% CI -1.04 to -0.16), treatment withdrawal (RR 0.27, 95% CI 0.16 to 0.46), and arterial hypertension (RR 0.67, 95% CI 0.50 to 0.89). However, the finding for arterial hypertension was not confirmed when analysed using a random-effects model (RR 0.54, 95% CI 0.17 to 1.73). Furthermore, trial sequential analysis found that none of the meta-analyses reached the required information sizes and cumulative Z-curves did not cross trial sequential monitoring boundaries. Diabetes mellitus occurred more frequently among people in the tacrolimus group compared with the cyclosporin group when the fixed-effect model was applied (RR 4.24, 95% CI 1.58 to 11.40), but no difference was found when the random-effects model was used for analysis (RR 4.43, 95% CI 0.75 to 26.05). Again, trial sequential analysis found that the required information threshold was not reached and cumulative Z-curve did not cross the trial sequential monitoring boundary. No significant difference between treatment groups was observed regarding mortality (RR 1.06, 95% CI 0.75 to 1.49), incidence of acute rejection (RR 0.89, 95% CI 0.77 to 1.03), numbers of infections/100 patient-days (MD -0.15, 95% CI -0.30 to 0.00), cancer (RR 0.21, 95% CI 0.04 to 1.16), kidney dysfunction (RR 1.41, 95% CI 0.93 to 2.14), kidney failure (RR 1.57, 95% CI 0.28 to 8.94), neurotoxicity (RR 7.06, 95% CI 0.37 to 135.19), and hyperlipidaemia (RR 0.60, 95% CI 0.30 to 1.20). Trial sequential analysis showed the required information thresholds were not reached for any of these outcome measures.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Tacrolimus may be superior to cyclosporin regarding bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome, lymphocytic bronchitis, treatment withdrawal, and arterial hypertension, but may be inferior regarding development of diabetes. No difference in mortality and acute rejection was observed between patients treated with tacrolimus and cyclosporin. There were few studies comparing tacrolimus and cyclosporin after lung transplantation, and the numbers of patients and events in the included studies were limited. Furthermore, the included studies were deemed to be at high risk of bias. Hence, more RCTs are needed to assess the results of the present review. Such studies ought to be conducted with low risks of systematic errors (bias) and of random errors (play of chance).

Monitoring of nonsteroidal immunosuppressive drugs in patients with lung disease and lung transplant recipients: American College of Chest Physicians evidence-based clinical practice guidelines

OBJECTIVES

Immunosuppressive pharmacologic agents prescribed to patients with diffuse interstitial and inflammatory lung disease and lung transplant recipients are associated with potential risks for adverse reactions. Strategies for minimizing such risks include administering these drugs according to established, safe protocols; monitoring to detect manifestations of toxicity; and patient education. Hence, an evidence-based guideline for physicians can improve safety and optimize the likelihood of a successful outcome. To maximize the likelihood that these agents will be used safely, the American College of Chest Physicians established a committee to examine the clinical evidence for the administration and monitoring of immunosuppressive drugs (with the exception of corticosteroids) to identify associated toxicities associated with each drug and appropriate protocols for monitoring these agents.

METHODS

Committee members developed and refined a series of questions about toxicities of immunosuppressives and current approaches to administration and monitoring. A systematic review was carried out by the American College of Chest Physicians. Committee members were supplied with this information and created this evidence-based guideline.

CONCLUSIONS

It is hoped that these guidelines will improve patient safety when immunosuppressive drugs are given to lung transplant recipients and to patients with diffuse interstitial lung disease.

A randomized trial of tacrolimus versus tacrolimus and prednisone for the maintenance of disease remission in noninfectious uveitis

PURPOSE

To compare tacrolimus monotherapy with tacrolimus and prednisone therapy for the maintenance of disease remission in subjects with noninfectious posterior segment intraocular inflammation (PSII).

DESIGN

Randomized, controlled, phase 2b, open-label, dual-center noninferiority trial.

PARTICIPANTS

Fifty-eight patients with sight-threatening PSII.

METHODS

Patients requiring a second-line systemic immunosuppressive agent to control their PSII were treated with therapeutic doses of oral tacrolimus. Those subjects who subsequently were able to taper their prednisone dose to 10 mg daily without disease reactivation were assigned randomly either to stop prednisone or to continue 7.5 to 10 mg prednisone daily for 9 months.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Change in logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) visual acuity (VA) and rate of patient withdrawal resulting from treatment inefficacy or intolerance.

RESULTS

Thirty-five patients successfully tapered their prednisone to 10 mg daily. Of these, 16 were allocated randomly to receive tacrolimus monotherapy and 19 to continue taking prednisone and tacrolimus dual therapy. The difference in the mean change in VA for monotherapy compared with the dual therapy group was less than 1 logMAR letter (logMAR, -0.008; 95% confidence interval, -0.108 to 0.092; P = 0.870). The proportion of patients who tolerated treatment and maintained disease remission for 9 months after randomization also was similar in both groups (monotherapy, 62.5%; dual therapy, 68.4%; P = 0.694). All monotherapy treatment failures were the result of disease reactivation, whereas 50% of dual-therapy failures were the result of drug intolerance.

CONCLUSIONS

This study provides preliminary evidence that corticosteroids can be withdrawn in tacrolimus-treated patients who are able to achieve control of PSII with 10 mg prednisone daily, and any advantage of dual therapy in the prevention of disease reactivation was offset by its greater treatment intolerance. These findings support the further evaluation of corticosteroid-free treatment in future phase 3 trials (International Standard Randomised Controlled Trial Number Register identification, ISRCTN46576063).

FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE(S)

Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found after the references.

Ocular safety and pharmacokinetics study of FK506 suspension eye drops after corneal transplantation

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to investigate the sensitization, pharmacokinetics, and absorption of FK506 after corneal transplantation.

METHODS

New Zealand albino rabbits were divided into normal and corneal transplantation groups. Each group was divided into 5 subgroups--saline, blank matrix, high-dose, medium-dose, and low-dose, respectively. There were 10 rabbits in each subgroup. One drop (25 μL) of FK506 was administered topically to both eyes of the rabbits 4 times daily for 30 days. Thirty days later, 5 rabbits of each subgroup were sacrificed after the administration of the last dose. Both eyes were enucleated; the left eye was used for pathologic examination and the right eye for the determination of FK506 distribution. The other 5 rabbits in each subgroup were sacrificed 14 days after the former 5 rabbits were sacrificed, and their eyes were enucleated for pathologic examination and tissue distribution determination as the former 5 rabbits in each subgroup (the second batch).

RESULTS

Fluorescein staining and local ocular reaction provided evidence that there were no significant differences between control and FK506-instilled eyes in the rabbit model at any of the tested doses. Histologic examination revealed no ocular abnormality in the rabbits instilled with any doses of FK506 eyedrop. The peak serum concentration (C(max)) of systemic absorption ranged from 4.31±0.79 ng/mL to 14.89±6.85 ng/mL.

CONCLUSION

Our study suggests that up to 0.1% FK506 administered 4 times a day (q.i.d.) topically is safe for the rabbit eye. However, further safety studies are required in view of systemic adverse effects.

Aerosolized tacrolimus: a case report in a lung transplant recipient

Long-term outcomes after lung transplantation remain poor mainly to the development of bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome (BOS). Currently, treatment options for BOS are very limited. Strategies to prevent and treat this complication include the use of aerosolized therapy with only cyclosporine used in patients to date. We describe the use of aerosolized tacrolimus in a lung transplant recipient with BOS. The patient demonstrated clinical improvement in functional capacity and oxygenation while receiving tacrolimus by nebulization. Further research is needed to study whether aerosolized tacrolimus is beneficial in lung transplant recipients with BOS.

Polyoxyl 60 hydrogenated castor oil free nanosomal formulation of immunosuppressant Tacrolimus: pharmacokinetics, safety, and tolerability in rodents and humans

OBJECTIVE

Develop Nanosomal formulation of Tacrolimus to provide safer alternative treatment for organ transplantation patients. Investigate safety, tolerability and pharmacokinetics of Nanosomal Tacrolimus formulation versus marketed Tacrolimus containing polyoxyl 60 hydrogenated castor oil (HCO-60) that causes side effects.

METHODS

Nanosomal Tacrolimus was prepared in an aqueous system. The particle size was measured by Particle Sizing Systems and structure morphology was determined by freeze-fracture electron microscopy. Investigational safety studies were conducted in mice and rats. Safety and pharmacokinetics of Nanosomal Tacrolimus were also evaluated in healthy human subjects.

RESULTS

The morphology of Nanosomal Tacrolimus showed a homogeneous population of nanosized particles with mean particle size of less than 100 nm. A 14 day consecutive administration of Nanosomal Tacrolimus up to 5 and 10mg/kg dose in rats and mice respectively, resulted in no mortality. Nanosomal Tacrolimus in human studies showed that it is safe and the pharmacokinetics profile is similar to the marketed HCO-60 based Tacrolimus. No significant change in peripheral blood lymphocyte percentage was noted in either mice or healthy human male subjects.

CONCLUSIONS

Nanosomal Tacrolimus is well characterized product which provides a new treatment option. It contains no alcohol or surfactants like HCO-60. Thus, Nanosomal Tacrolimus presents a new and improved therapeutic approach for organ transplant patients compared to the marketed HCO-60 based Tacrolimus product.

Long-term Efficacy and Tolerance of Tacrolimus for the Treatment of Uveitis

PURPOSE

To evaluate the long-term efficacy and tolerance of tacrolimus for the treatment of uveitis.

DESIGN

Retrospective case series.

PARTICIPANTS

Sixty-two consecutive patients with noninfectious uveitis treated with tacrolimus at a single academic referral center between April 2000 and April 2004.

METHODS

A standard data set was obtained from patients' medical records and analyzed according to the recommendations of the Standardization of Uveitis Nomenclature Working Group.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

(1) Rate of tapering oral prednisone to 10 mg daily, (2) requirement for alternative second-line immunosuppressive therapy, and (3) rate of tacrolimus dose reduction or discontinuation due to side effects.

RESULTS

In this cohort with well-established ocular inflammation, patients successfully tapered their oral prednisone to 10 mg daily at an average rate of 1.62 per patient-year (PY), with an 85% probability of achieving < or =10 mg after 1 year 2 months of treatment. Tacrolimus was discontinued due to intolerance at a rate of 0.13/PY. This was predominantly due to noncardiovascular adverse events, and rates of introducing or increasing concomitant treatment for hypertension, hypercholesterolemia, and diabetes mellitus were all below 0.05/PY. Creatinine rises of > or =30% were also notably uncommon (0.05/PY).

CONCLUSION

Tacrolimus's efficacy for the treatment of uveitis is maintained long-term, and its cardiovascular risk profile is excellent.

Emerging drugs in lung transplantation

The balance between immunosuppression to ensure graft tolerance while preventing emergence of infectious complications is key in lung transplantation. Although opportunistic infection may appear to be the most important of these complications, malignancies and severe drug toxicities significantly affect the short- and long-term outcomes of the patients. The present practice is combination therapy using drugs with complementary immunosuppressive action, to achieve synergistic immunosuppression with the lowest possible toxicity. Components of immunosuppression include induction and maintenance regimens. Primary graft failure remains an important cause of mortality and morbidity in the immediate post-transplant period. Acute rejection is a common complication after lung transplant, but responds well to augmented immunosuppression and immunomodulation. Chronic rejection still is the major cause of mortality in patients who survive the initial year post-transplantation. Several new drugs have shown promise in decreasing the rate of loss of graft function. This review discusses the current and emerging therapeutic regimens.

Efficacy and safety of inhaled tacrolimus in rat lung transplantation

OBJECTIVE

Because acute rejection is the most important cause of chronic rejection in lung transplantation, the use of conventional systemic immunosuppression to improve long-term survival needs to be reassessed. The aim of this study was to investigate the efficacy and safety of inhaled tacrolimus for preventing acute rejection of rat lung allografts.

METHODS

Orthotopic left lung transplantation was performed in rats that were divided into 6 groups: control group received no treatment; groups 1.0-IM, 0.5-IM, and 0.3-IM received tacrolimus by intramuscular injection at 1.0, 0.5, and 0.3 mg/(kg.d), respectively; and groups 12-IT and 6-IT received 12 and 6 puffs of inhaled tacrolimus 3 times per day, respectively. Allografts were studied histologically. Whole blood and allograft tacrolimus concentrations were determined.

RESULTS

In groups 1.0-IM and 12-IT, histologic grade of the graft showed significantly less rejection than in the other groups. The blood tacrolimus concentration in group 12-IT (4.87 ng/mL) was significantly lower than that in group 1.0-IM (13.05 ng/mL, P = .0017) on postoperative day 7. Higher allograft tacrolimus concentrations were achieved in group 1.0-IM (478.0 ng/g) than in group 12-IT (270.4 ng/g, P = .009). Weight loss and diarrhea in group 12-IT were less severe than in the groups that received systemic tacrolimus. The proliferating cell nuclear antigen index in bronchus-associated lymphoid tissue cells was significantly lower in group 12-IT than in group 1.0-IM (P = .0209).

CONCLUSION

Local immunotherapy with inhaled tacrolimus has great potential for controlling pulmonary allograft rejection in clinical lung transplantation because it has fewer side effects than systemic immunosuppressive agents.

Nano-liposomal dry powder inhaler of tacrolimus: preparation, characterization, and pulmonary pharmacokinetics

The studies were undertaken to evaluate feasibility of pulmonary delivery of liposomaly encapsulated tacrolimus dry powder inhaler for prolonged drug retention in lungs as rescue therapy to prevent refractory rejection of lungs after transplantation. Tacrolimus encapsulated liposomes were prepared by thin film evaporation technique and liposomal dispersion was passed through high pressure homogenizer. Tacrolimus nano-liposomes (NLs) were separated by centrifugation and characterized. NLs were dispersed in phosphate buffer saline (PBS) pH 7.4 containing different additives like lactose, sucrose, and trehalose, and L-leucine as antiadherent. The dispersion was spray dried and spray dried powders were characterized. In vitro and in vivo pulmonary deposition was performed using Andersen Cascade Impactor and intratracheal instillation in rats respectively. NLs were found to have average size of 140 nm, 96% +/- 1.5% drug entrapment, and zeta potential of 1.107 mV. Trehalose based formulation was found to have low density, good flowability, particle size of 9.46 +/- 0.8 microm, maximum fine particle fraction (FPF) of 71.1 +/- 2.5%, mean mass aerodynamic diameter (MMAD) 2.2 +/- 0.1 microm, and geometric standard deviation (GSD) 1.7 +/- 0.2. Developed formulations were found to have in vitro prolonged drug release up to 18 hours, following Higuchi's Controlled Release model. In vivo studies revealed maximal residence of tacrolimus within lungs of 24 hours, suggesting slow clearance from the lungs. The investigation provides a practical approach for direct delivery of tacrolimus encapsulated in NLs for controlled and prolonged retention at the site of action. It may play a promising role as rescue therapy in reducing the risk of acute rejection and chronic rejection.

Lung Transplantation: Advances in Immunosuppression

Since the advent of various novel immunosuppressants, including tacrolimus, rapamycin, and daclixumab. expanding variations of protocols have been developed. Little evidence exists to substantially support a single agent over another. or a combination regimen protocol over another. Therefore, the principles and the goals of immunosuppression in lung transplantation recipients will remain moving targets and continue to evolve, and the use of large-scale, multi-institutional clinical trials is imperative to develop optimal immunosuppressive strategies.

Effects of Inhaled FK 506 on the Suppression of Acute Rejection After Lung Transplantation: Use of a Rat Orthotopic Lung Transplantation Model

BACKGROUND

FK 506 inhalant was recently developed for localized administration. We investigated its effects on acute lung allograft rejection and compared its efficacy with that of intramuscular administration of FK 506.

METHODS

Rats (n = 123) with orthotopic left lung transplantation were divided into 9 groups. Six groups inhaled FK 506 (5 puffs, 10 puffs or 20 puffs per day), or were given intramuscular administration of FK 506 (0.05, 0.1 or 1.0 mg/kg/day). The other groups included rats receiving an isograft, rats with an untreated allograft, and a placebo group. All groups (n = 6 each) were monitored for 14 days post-operatively as an end-point and graft survival time was determined. The remaining animals were killed 4 days after transplantation. The histologic grade of rejection was determined for all groups (n = 6 each). With both (n = 3 each) inhalation therapy and intramuscular administration of FK 506, which showed similar degrees of effectiveness, both blood FK 506 concentration and cytokine expression in the graft and spleen were evaluated.

RESULTS

FK 506 inhalation therapy extended allograft survival time and reduced histologic rejection on Day 4 in all groups. Graft survival time and histologic rejection scores at a dose of 10 puffs/day were comparable to those with 0.1 mg/kg/day of intramuscular FK 506. Trough concentrations of FK 506 in blood were detectable with 0.1 mg/kg/day of intramuscular FK 506, but not with 10 puffs/day. The messenger RNA expression levels of interferon-gamma in the lung allograft was suppressed significantly at a dose of 10 puffs/day.

CONCLUSIONS

FK 506 inhalant enhances acute lung allograft survival with lower blood concentrations than when using comparable intramuscular administration.

Complete replacement of tracheal epithelia by the host promotes spontaneous acceptance of orthotopic tracheal allografts in rats

BACKGROUND

Tracheal immunogenicity has been controversial. Although replacement of allotracheal epithelia by the host epithelia has been reported in rat orthotopic tracheal grafting, the immunological effect of epithelial replacement is still uncertain.

METHODS

We performed orthotopic tracheal grafting of nine cartilage rings in the following groups: 1, Lewis --> Lewis (n = 30); 2, ACI --> DA (n = 25); 3, Lewis --> F344 (n = 23); 4-A, DA --> Lewis (n = 41); 4-B, DA --> Lewis with tacrolimus therapy (1 mg/kg/d for 10 days) starting from the day of the operation (n = 31); 4-C, retransplantation of DA allografts to secondary naive Lewis rats 10 or 15 days after primary grafting (n = 11); 4-D, DA --> Lewis with tacrolimus therapy starting from postoperative day 10 (n = 6). Survival times and histopathology were assessed. Epithelial replacement was evaluated by immunohistochemistry.

RESULTS

All rats survived in groups 1, 2, and 3. Even in the fully histoincompatible group 4-A, survival ratio on day 120 was 15%. Epithelial replacement was in progress on day 10 in this group. However, all tacrolimus-treated rats died by day 54 and epithelial replacement did not occur on days 30 and 50 in group 4-B. In group 4-C, retransplantation after complete epithelial replacement increased the long-surviving rats. In group 4-D, all rats receiving tacrolimus therapy after complete epithelial replacement survived over 120 days.

CONCLUSIONS

These results suggest that complete replacement of tracheal epithelia by the host promotes spontaneous acceptance of orthotopic tracheal allografts in rats.

International experience with conversion from cyclosporine to tacrolimus for acute and chronic lung allograft rejection

OBJECTIVE

A retrospective study involving 13 institutions was performed to assess the efficacy of conversion from cyclosporine (INN: ciclosporin) to tacrolimus.

METHODS

Data from 244 patients were analyzed. Indications for conversion were recurrent-ongoing rejection (n = 110) and stage 1 to 3 bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome (n = 134).

RESULTS

The incidence of acute rejection decreased significantly within 3 months after versus before the switch from cyclosporine to tacrolimus (P <.01). For patients with recurrent-ongoing rejection, the forced expiratory volume in 1 second decreased by 1.96% of predicted value per month (P =.08 vs zero slope) before and increased by 0.34% of predicted value per month (P =.32 vs zero slope) after conversion (P <.06). For patients with stage 1 to 3 bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome, a significant reduction of rejection episodes was observed (P <.01). In single transplant recipients a decrease of the forced expiratory volume in 1 second averaged 2.25% of predicted value per month (P <.01 vs zero slope) before and 0.29% of predicted value per month after conversion. Corresponding values for bilateral transplant recipients were 3.7% of predicted value per month (P <.01 vs zero slope) and 0.9% of predicted value per month (P = 0.04 vs zero slope), respectively. No significant difference in the incidence of infections within 3 months before and after conversion was observed.

CONCLUSIONS

Conversion from cyclosporine to tacrolimus after lung transplantation is associated with reversal of recurrent-ongoing rejection. Conversion for bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome allows short-term stabilization of lung function in most patients.

Comparison of three tacrolimus-based immunosuppressive regimens in lung transplantation

Immunosuppressive therapy for solid organ transplantation has significantly evolved over the past decade. While these therapies have been found to be beneficial in abdominal organ transplantation, the efficacy of these therapies remains unclear in lung transplantation. We retrospectively compared three potent immunosuppressive regimens in our lung transplant population: Group 1 (tacrolimus/azathioprine/prednisone), Group 2 (tacrolimus/azathioprine/prednisone/daclizumab) and Group 3 (tacrolimus/mycophenolate mofetil/prednisone/daclizumab). We compared these three groups with respect to 3-year rates of acute rejection, chronic rejection, infection and survival. A total of 109 patients was followed during the course of this study. There were 32 patients in Group 1, 49 patients in Group 2 and 28 patients in Group 3. Freedom from acute rejection at 1 and 3 years were higher in Group 3 compared with Group 1 (p < 0.05). The overall incidence of infection up to 3 years after transplantation was comparable among all three groups. Freedom from chronic rejection and survival at 1 and 3 years did not differ among the three groups. In conclusion, we determined the safety and efficacy of three potent immunosuppressive regimens in lung transplantation. Addition of daclizumab and MMF to a tacrolimus-based immunosuppressive regimen decreased the incidence of acute rejection episodes without increasing any adverse events in our lung transplantation population.

Pattern and Predictors of Early Rejection After Lung Transplantation

• Background Most lung transplant recipients experience improvement in their underlying pulmonary condition but are faced with the threat of allograft rejection, the primary determinant of long-term survival. Several studies examined predictors of rejection, but few focused on the early period after transplantation.

• Objectives To describe the pattern and predictors of early rejection during the first year after transplantation to guide the development of interventions to facilitate earlier detection and treatment of rejection.

• Methods Data for donor, recipient, and posttransplant variables were retrieved retrospectively for 250 recipients of single or double lung transplants.

• Results Most recipients (85%) had at least 1 episode of acute rejection; 33% had a single episode; 23% had recurrent rejection; 3% had persistent rejection; 13% had refractory rejection; and 14% had clinicopathological evidence of chronic rejection. Serious rejection (refractory acute rejection or chronic rejection) developed in 27% of recipients. Compared with other recipients, recipients who had serious rejection had more episodes of acute rejection (P = .004), and the first acute episodes occurred sooner after transplantation (P = .01) and were of a higher grade (P = .002).

• Conclusions Recipients who experienced higher grades for their first episode of acute rejection (P=.03) and higher cumulative rejection scores (P = .004) were significantly more likely than other recipients to have serious rejection during the first year after transplantation.

Transplant immunology

The immune response to an allogeneic transplanted organ is T-cell dependent. It is governed partially by the context in which the T-cell encounters the antigen and can range from apoptosis, anergy, and neglect to full activation. The current armamentarium of immunosuppressive agents acts to inhibit the various steps of this T-cell activation pathway; at the level of the T-cell receptor (monoclonal antibodies such as OKT3), intracellular signally (calcineurine-inhibitors), DNA synthesis (azathioprine), or to cause lymphocyte depletion (ATG, ALG). Most protocols use a combination of agents for induction and maintenance immunosuppression. Although successful in preventing and treating allograft rejection, they are not without side effects. With improved patient and graft survival rates, adverse events such as hypertension, nephrotoxicity, hyperglycaemia, and lymphoproliferative disease become increasingly important issues. Newer drugs (IL-2 receptor antagonists, mycophenolate mofetil, rapamycin) have been introduced in an attempt to spare or avoid these adverse effects. Inducing graft tolerance and long-term drug-free survival is the goal of transplant immunologists. Postulated mechanisms include clonal deletion, anergy, and immunoredirection. Although a number of methods have been tested experimentally, none has been proven to induce tolerance for routine clinical use. Immunosuppression remains the cornerstone of the success of organ transplantation. Until investigators are able to induce tolerance in their transplant recipients or develop a tolerance assay, they would need to continue to tailor their immunosuppressive therapy according to the risk profile of the individual recipient.

Lung transplants with tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil: a review

Traditionally, immunosuppressive maintenance therapy in solid organ transplantation has consisted of cyclosporine (CsA), azathioprine, and prednisone. However, lung transplant recipients are far more frequently affected by acute rejection, especially during the first 6 months after the transplantation, than patients with other transplanted organs. Further, they display a greater risk for chronic transplant dysfunction and ultimate graft loss. Bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome (BOS) is the major cause of morbidity and mortality among long-term survivors after lung transplantation. Acute pulmonary allograft rejection has been identified as the major risk factor for the development of BOS. Based on favourable results in kidney, liver, and heart transplantation, tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil have been used as primary prophylaxis and as rescue therapy for recurrent or persistent acute rejection and BOS. A secondary indication is CsA toxicity. This review focuses on reported results of the combination of tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil in lung transplantation. These new immunosuppressive drugs have markedly improved the efficacy profiles without additional detrimental toxicities, and appear to be a safe alternative to CsA and azathioprine in patients following lung transplantation. However, at present, BOS is not influenced by these new drugs. The optimal long-term immunosuppressive regimen remains to be established.

Tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil provide effective immunosuppression in rat laryngeal transplantation

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS

Tacrolimus is efficacious in several transplantation settings. Some studies have demonstrated improved results using combination therapy with mycophenolate mofetil. Our primary objective was to evaluate the efficacy and optimal dosing of tacrolimus in preventing rejection, using an established rat model of laryngeal transplantation. Further, the ability of mycophenolate to allow lower dosing of tacrolimus while achieving equivalent immunosuppression was investigated.

STUDY DESIGN

A dosage efficacy study with 10 experimental arms was conducted.

METHODS

Dosage groups were 0.1, 0.2, 0.3, and 0.6 mg/kg tacrolimus alone and 0.1 mg/kg tacrolimus combined with 15 mg/kg mycophenolate mofetil, 0.1 mg/kg tacrolimus combined with 30 mg/kg mycophenolate mofetil, 0.1 mg/kg tacrolimus combined with 40 mg/kg mycophenolate mofetil, 0.2 mg/kg tacrolimus combined with 15 mg/kg mycophenolate mofetil, 0.2 mg/kg tacrolimus combined with 30 mg/kg mycophenolate mofetil (30 d only), and 0.2 mg/kg tacrolimus combined with 40 mg/kg mycophenolate mofetil. Each group contained 8 to 10 rats. Grafts were harvested for histopathological analysis on day 15 or 30 after transplantation. Histopathological appearance of the graft was blindly graded according to an established scale. Dosage groups were compared on rejection score using Wilcoxon's rank sum test and the Jonckheere-Terpstra test for trend.

RESULTS

There was a significant association between increasing dose of tacrolimus and decreasing rejection score at both 15 and 30 days (P <.001). In the groups treated with 0.1 mg/kg T, an increasing dose of mycophenolate was associated with lower rejection scores at both 15 and 30 days (P =.001). In the group treated with 0.2 mg/kg T, there was no evidence that the addition of mycophenolate resulted in lower rejection at 15 days. However, at 30 days, combination therapy with increasing doses of mycophenolate was associated with decreasing rejection score (P =.002).

CONCLUSIONS

Tacrolimus is an effective immunosuppressive agent for laryngeal transplantation. Mycophenolate mofetil allows lower doses of tacrolimus to be used while preserving graft viability in the early post-transplantation period.

Efficacy of tacrolimus rescue therapy in refractory acute rejection after lung transplantation

BACKGROUND

Encouraging results in transplantation of other solid organs led to investigation of the use of tacrolimus in lung transplantation as a salvage immunosuppressant in persistent acute rejection.

METHODS

The incidence and severity of acute rejection and the number of steroid pulses were analyzed in 20 lung recipients who were converted from a cyclosporine- to a tacrolimus-based immunosuppressive regimen because of refractory biopsy-proven acute rejection.

RESULTS

Tacrolimus was started 12.0 +/- 13.0 months after transplantation, and the mean follow-up was 25.0 +/- 13.7 months. After shifting to tacrolimus, a significant decline was observed in both the number of acute rejections per patient (3.0 +/- 1.56 to 0.85 +/- 1.14, p < 0.0001), and the incidence of acute rejection per 100 patient-days (1.52 +/- 0.99 to 0.14 +/- 0.21, p < 0.0001). Furthermore, the average histologic grade of rejection decreased from 1.9 +/- 0.8 to 0.4 +/- 0.5 (p < 0.0001). Methylprednisolone pulses similarly decreased from 1.9 +/- 1.3/patient to 0.3 +/- 0.7/patient (p < 0.0001). During cyclosporine immunosuppression, the mean forced expiratory volume in 1 second decreased to 84.4% +/- 13.3% of individual best value. The average lung function parameters were stable 3 months after the change of medication, and then began to improve. After an average follow-up of 36.5 +/- 19.2 months, 2 patients have developed bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome (one has Stage 1 and one has Stage 3).

CONCLUSION

Conversion to a tacrolimus-based immunosuppressive regimen for refractory acute lung rejection is associated with reduced incidence and severity of acute rejection episodes, steroid sparing, and stabilization or improvement of pulmonary function.

Lung transplantation for primary pulmonary hypertension

Recent progress in medical therapies has diminished the role of transplantation in the management of PPH during the past decade. Drug therapy is not effective in some patients, responses to therapy are not sustained over time in others, and drug side effects eventually limit the benefits of treatment in a few more. Lung transplantation therefore ultimately is the only alternative for patients whose PPH is severe and cannot be managed medically. Choosing the right patient as a transplant candidate and the right time to make the initial referral to a transplant center are the crucial initial steps in the transplantation process, and the long waiting time before transplantation must be integrated into this decision. The outcome of lung and heart-lung transplantation for PHH has been good but sobering. Functional recovery has been excellent, but long-term survival results have been limited by the high prevalence of chronic allograft rejection.

Induction of choleresis by immunosuppressant FK506 through stimulation of insulin-like growth factor-I production in the liver of rats

FK506 (Tacrolimus) is an effective immunosuppressant currently used worldwide in organ transplantation. Based on our recent findings that insulin-like growth factor-I (IGF-I) is important for the stimulation of choleresis in vivo, in this study we investigated the effect of FK506 on bile flow and the plasma and hepatic levels of IGF-I in rats. Intravenous treatment of rats with FK506 resulted in a significant increase in bile flow, whereas cyclosporin A induced a significant decrease. A significant increase in plasma levels of IGF-I was observed in rats 30 min after a single intravenous administration of FK506. Oral treatment of rats with FK506 for 1 week also resulted in an increase in both plasma and hepatic levels of IGF-I. Overall, this study showed that FK506 treatment increased bile flow and also induced an increase in the plasma and hepatic levels of IGF-I in rats, suggesting that a stimulation of hepatic IGF-I production by FK506 may contribute to its choleretic profile.

Tacrolimus versus cyclosporine after lung transplantation: a prospective, open, randomized two-center trial comparing two different immunosuppressive protocols

BACKGROUND

The need for better immunosuppressive protocols after lung transplantation led us to investigate tacrolimus (Tac) in combination with mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) and steroids or cyclosporine (CsA) in combination with MMF and steroids in a prospective, open, randomized trial after lung transplantation.

METHODS

Between September 1997 and April 1999, 50 lung transplant recipients were randomized to receive either Tac (n = 26) or CsA (n = 24) in combination with MMF and steroids. All patients underwent induction therapy with rabbit antithymocyte globulin (ATG) for 3 days. Freedom from acute rejection (AR), patient survival, infection episodes, and side effects were monitored.

RESULTS

There was no difference in patient demographics between the two groups. Six-month and 1-year survival was similar (84.6% and 73.1% in the Tac group vs 83.3% and 79.2% in the CsA group). Freedom from AR at 6 months and 1 year after lung transplantation was slightly higher in the Tac group (57.7% and 50% vs 45.8% and 33.3%, p = not significant [n.s.]), whereas the number of treated rejection episodes per 100 patient days in the Tac group was significantly lower (0.225 vs 0.426, p < .05). Four patients in the CsA group had to be switched to Tac. Two patients in the CsA group had to be retransplanted. Incidence of infections was similar in both groups with a trend toward more fungal infections in the Tac group (n = 7 vs n = 1, p = n.s.).

CONCLUSIONS

The combination of Tac and MMF seems to have slightly higher immunosuppressive potential compared with CsA and MMF. The effectiveness of Tac as a rescue agent is not paralleled with undue signs of overimmunosuppression.

Care before and after lung transplant and quality of life research

Lung transplantation is a growing surgical option for patients with end-stage lung and pulmonary vascular diseases. After completing an extensive evaluation and meeting the selection criteria, patients are listed for either single or bilateral-sequential lung transplantation. Immediate postoperative management requires detailed attention to fluid management, monitoring for infection, reperfusion injury, pulmonary hygiene, and pain management. Length of stay depends on the patient's condition before transplant and postoperative complications. Discharge from the hospital can be as early as 7 days after transplantation. Newer immunosuppressive medications offer more options for treating and preventing rejection. Advanced practice nurses, such as coordinators, case managers, nurse practitioners, and clinical nurse specialists, are uniquely positioned to play key roles in coordinating the care of transplant patients across settings and both before and after the transplant procedure. The perioperative needs of lung transplant patients and the impact of this complex procedure on the recipients' and family's quality of life merit further investigation by clinicians and researchers.

Lung transplantation at the turn of the century

Lung transplantation has become a viable treatment option for patients with end-stage lung disease. Donor selection and organ allocation must follow specific guidelines. Single, bilateral, and living-donor lobar transplantation have all been performed successfully for a variety of diseases. Complications include reimplantation response and airway complications. Rejection may occur in the hyperacute, acute, or chronic settings and requires judicious management with immunosuppression. Infection and malignancy remain potential complications of the commitment to lifelong systemic immunosuppression. Survival statistics have remained encouraging and continue to improve with experience. Improved exercise tolerance and quality of life have been demonstrated in the years following transplantation. Remaining obstacles include limited donor organ availability, long-term graft function, and patient survival. However, ongoing advances in immune tolerance and standardized training of physicians in the care of transplant patients should carry lung transplant forward in the twenty-first century.

Evaluation of microparticle enzyme immunoassay against HPLC-mass spectrometry for the determination of whole-blood tacrolimus in heart- and lung-transplant recipients

OBJECTIVES

Tacrolimus is an immunosuppressant drug with a narrow therapeutic window and thus requires therapeutic drug monitoring. This study evaluates the suitability of the second-generation microparticle enzyme immunoassay (MEIA II) against a specific method, high-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (HPLC-MS), for the measurement of tacrolimus in both heart- and lung-transplant groups. A secondary objective was to investigate the effect of tacrolimus concentration on MEIA II measurement.

METHODS

The HPLC-MS assay was conducted as per our reported method and MEIA II performed according to manufacturer's instructions. Quality-control samples at 5, 11, and 22 microg/L were run in each batch to ensure assay integrity in both methods. Multiple trough samples from 18 heart patients (n = 126) and 17 lung patients (n = 203) were analyzed.

RESULTS

The inter-batch imprecision and analytical recovery over the quality-control range by HPLC-MS (n = 12) was <6% and 98.2% to 104%, respectively, and by MEIA II (n = 16) <15% and 92.0% to 99.1%, respectively. The mean overestimation by MEIA II between the two methods for heart- and lung-transplant patient samples was found to be 9.9% (range: -37.4-45.4%) and 13.2% (range: -29.2-64.3%), respectively. Stratification of these data based on the tacrolimus concentration determined by MEIA II, yielded no statistically significant differences in bias between concentration subgroups within the clinically relevant range (p > 0.4). However, a statistically significant difference was detected between the highest concentration subgroup (>20.0 microg/L) and lower concentration subgroups in both transplant populations (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

This study suggests that where HPLC-MS is not available, MEIA II may be suitable for the therapeutic drug monitoring of tacrolimus in heart- and lung-transplant recipients. However, the clinical importance of the observed mean bias, considering the wide range in overestimation in heart- and lung-transplant patient samples, is yet to be determined.

Efficacy of tacrolimus in patients with steroid-resistant cardiac allograft cellular rejection

BACKGROUND

Tacrolimus is an immunosuppressive agent that is gaining widespread use in solid organ transplantation. This study was undertaken to evaluate the efficacy of tacrolimus in treating steroid-resistant cellular myocardial rejection.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed the incidence of rejection and clinical outcome of 21 heart transplant recipients who were electively converted from cyclosporine to tacrolimus for recurrent episodes of steroid-resistant cellular rejection. These were compared to a historic group of 6 hemodynamically stable patients who were treated electively with Orthoclone OKT3 (Muromonab/CD3) for recurrent rejection.

RESULTS

Eighty five percent (56/66) of the episodes of rejection occurred within the first 3 months after heart transplantation. Tacrolimus was started 2. 4 +/- 2.0 months post-transplant, and the mean follow-up duration on tacrolimus was 11.0 +/- 7.0 months. After conversion, a significant decline was noted in both the number of episodes of acute rejection per patient (3.14 +/- 0.85-0.57 +/- 0.87, p < 0.0001), and the incidence of acute rejection per 100 patient-days (6.39 +/- 3.96-0. 25 +/- 0.47, p < 0.0001). In comparison, OKT3 was started 5.25 +/- 9. 20 months post-transplant. Similarly, there was a significant decrease in the incidence of acute rejection per 100 patient-days (8. 69 +/- 5.65-0.20 +/- 0.23, p < 0.0001). The average hospital charges per patient for the OKT3-treated group was $33,339 +/- $10,511. There was no significant difference in the actuarial 1-year survival between the tacrolimus and OKT3-treated groups (93% vs 80%, p = 0.5).

CONCLUSIONS

Outpatient conversion to tacrolimus is safe, well tolerated, and an effective therapeutic strategy for the treatment of steroid-resistant cellular rejection in heart transplant recipients. It is more cost-effective than OKT3 in the hemodynamically stable patient and outcomes are similar.