Successful renal transplantation from two donors with methanol intoxication

Successful use of deceased donors with medically complex kidneys

The number of patients waiting for kidney transplants from deceased organ donors continues to increase. In this context, non-transplantation of acceptable kidneys is especially regrettable. Here, we review successful transplantation of deceased donor kidneys with anatomic abnormalities, intrinsic kidney diseases, and other ostensibly problematic conditions. These scenarios will be encountered infrequently and, with limited time to decide, uncertainty often results in organ refusal. In general, anatomic abnormalities can be overcome, kidney diseases remit in recipients, and systemic donor conditions such as poisonings do not affect the recipient. Acknowledging the risk of publication bias and need for more long-term outcome data, familiarity with these "once in a lifetime" deceased donor kidneys potentially avoids unwarranted refusals and provides insights into many disease processes.

Successful Kidney Transplant From a Brain Stem-Dead Donor Due To Lethal Methanol Poisoning

Kidney replacement is the best treatment modality for chronic renal failure; however,the greatest obstacle for transplant is the scarce number of donor organs. In the United States and Europe, less than 1% of organs for transplant are provided from patients with lethal poisoning. In this paper, we present a successful kidney transplant from a donor with methanol poisoning. A 38-year-old-man who had methanol poisoning developed brain stem death after unsuccessful treatment and was a candidate to be a kidney donor for transplant to a 27-year-old male patient with chronic renal failure. Three weeks after kidney transplant, the recipient was discharged with good kidney function. We suggest that it may be possible to consider lethal methanol poisoning for kidney donation.

Acute Renal Injury Following Methanol Poisoning: Analysis of a Case Series

The objective of this paper is to document the prevalence of indicators of acute renal injury in a series of methanol-poisoned patients treated in an intensive care unit and to discuss the possible mechanisms. This is a retrospective analysis of the medical records of 25 consecutive patients admitted to the intensive care unit after severe intentional methanol poisoning. Acute renal impairment was defined as a serum creatinine concentration higher than 177 μmol/L and/or a urinary output on admission and for the first 24 h below 0.5 ml/kg/h. Clinical pathological signs of acute renal injury were found in 15 patients. In comparison with the 10 other patients taken as control group, the patients who developed renal injury had a lower blood pH value on admission, a higher serum osmolality, and a higher peak formate concentration. Two factors contributing to renal injury could be identified: hemolysis and myoglobinuria. The role of osmotic changes (“osmotic nephrosis”) or of a direct cytotoxic effect of formic acid remains speculative. Analysis of proteinuria suggests that proximal tubular cells may be preferentially affected. Results of histopathological evaluation of the kidney on a limited sample size ( n = 5) were inconclusive but suggestive of possible hydropic changes in the proximal tubule secondary to methanol toxicity. Acute renal injury may be associated with other signs of severity in methanol poisoning, but it is almost always reversible in survivors. Indicators of acute renal injury were identified. The pathophysiology of this acute renal injury is multifactorial and far more complex than shock-related tubular necrosis.

Organ Donor Issues for the Intensive Care Physician

The opportunity for organ donation most often arises in the intensive care unit following the declaration of brain death. Thus a comprehensive discussion of the topic of organ donation is of special importance to the intensive care physician. The essential criteria of brain death are provided in this review; however, a unitarian concept is emphasized, that all death is occasioned by an irreversible loss of brain function. Recovery of organs from a non-heart-beating organ donor is presented in this context. The characteristics of the suitable cadaver organ donor are reviewed, detailing donor age considerations and the exclusion criteria of HIV infection and a history of donor malignancy. An analysis of death caused by specific poisons is presented that is amenable to cadaver organ donation. The shortage of cadaver organs for transplantation persists. The major obstacle to donation is family consent. A paradigm of procedure from organ donor referral to organ recovery in the operating room is outlined, with a discussion of the suggested best practice for achieving family consent. This emphasizes the need for highly trained personnel to request consent for organ donation. Intensive care unit management of the donor following the declaration of death is given by a problem-oriented review, intended to preserve hemodynamic stability until organ recovery can be accomplished.

Successful Kidney Transplant from Methanol-Intoxicated Donors

The well-described disparity between the need for and the supply of organs suitable for transplant is growing. Because of this disparity, mortality of patients listed for transplant is increasing. Donors who die of intoxication (including victims of methanol poisoning) represent less than 1% of suitable donors and might be used to increase the supply of organs. They are often not accepted as donors by transplant specialists, because of concerns about patients' outcomes with these grafts. Three cases of fatal methanol intoxication that resulted in transplants of 6 kidneys are evaluated.

Fatal methanol intoxication with different survival times--morphological findings and postmortem methanol distribution

Three corresponding cases of fatal methanol intoxication with different survival times were investigated ante-mortem and postmortem. Ante-mortem serum methanol concentrations were determined during treatment in hospital for 4 days. Furthermore, postmortem distribution of methanol in various tissues and fluids was measured after autopsy. Morphological and toxicological findings are discussed based on the literature. The morphological findings correlated with the different survival times. The results of the toxicological analyses were partly in keeping with previously published data. Interestingly, very high methanol levels were determined in brain with very low concentrations in femoral venous blood. These results may have implications for postmortem toxicological analysis, brain death diagnosis and organ explanation for transplantation.

Prélèvements d’organes après intoxication

BACKGROUND

There is an increasing gap between the number of patients on the waiting list and the number of transplanted patients. In France, more than 10000 patients waited for an organ transplantation in 2002. Due to the graft shortage, "marginal" donors are now considered. The patients who present brain death after accidental or voluntary poisoning belong to this category.

EPIDEMIOLOGY

The data available from European or North American organ procurement organisations show that poisoned donors represent about 1% of all organ donors. It seems likely that a significant number of poisoned patients are not referred because poisoning is regarded as a contraindication to organ donation. When organ procurement can be achieved, the results expressed as recipient survival or graft survival are quite encouraging.

TOXIC PRODUCTS

The most frequently involved toxins are either drugs (psychotropic agents, analgesics...), illicit substances, or environmental agents (gases, alcohols...). The literature data are discussed; some issues remain controversial.

PRACTICAL APPROACH

Several criteria have to be applied when poisoned patients are considered as potential organ donors. Besides a firm diagnosis of "brain death", the knowledge of the "target organs" of poisoning is of paramount importance, together with careful analysis of the toxicokinetics and toxicodynamics. In most cases, routine biological and morphological data are sufficient to assess graft function.

Poisoned patients as potential organ donors: postal survey of transplant centres and intensive care units

BACKGROUND

The number of patients awaiting allograft transplantation in the UK exceeds the number of organs offered for transplantation each year. Most organ donors tend to be young, fit and healthy individuals who die because of trauma or sudden cardiac arrest. Patients who die from drug and poison intoxication tend to have similar characteristics but are less frequently offered as potential organ donors.

METHODS

A postal questionnaire survey of all transplantation centres and an equal number of intensive care units in the UK was undertaken. The use of kidney, heart, lung, liver and pancreas transplants from poisoned patients following deliberate methanol ingestion, cardiac arrest presumed secondary to cocaine overdose, accidental domestic carbon monoxide inhalation and industrial cyanide exposure were used as case scenarios.

RESULTS

Response rates were 70% for transplantation centres and 50% for intensive care unit directors. Over 80% of organs would be offered or discussed with transplant coordinators by intensive care unit directors. Transplantation physicians/surgeons would consider transplanting organs in up to 100% of case scenarios, depending on the organ and poisoning or intoxication involved.

DISCUSSION

The postal survey presented here shows that most transplantation physicians and surgeons and intensive care unit directors would consider those who die following acute drug intoxication and poisoning as potential organ donors. The previously reported literature shows in general that transplanted organs from poisoned patients have good long-term survival, although the number of reports is small. Poisoned patients are another pool of organ donors who at present are probably underused by transplantation services.

Accreditation of skin from a methanol-poisoned victim for banking and grafting

BACKGROUND

Acute poisoning is a contraindication for organ and tissue donation. In this study the suitability of skin from a methanol-poisoned (MP) donor for future grafting and keratinocytes culturing was investigated.

METHODS

A patient was admitted with a methanol blood level of 2.7 mg/mL, which became undetectable after 4 days of treatment with 4-methylpyrazole (fomepizole). Upon declared brain death and family consent, organs and skin were harvested. For approving MP skin for grafting, the following parameters were studied: viability and plating efficiency of MP keratinocytes, integrity of MP skin after cryopreservation, and its performance as xenografts on wounds in a pig model. Nonpoisoned (NP) controls included skin of matching age, cryopreservation period, and NP keratinocytes.

RESULTS

No significant differences were observed for any parameter between NP and MP samples. Furthermore, in vitro exposure of NP keratinocytes and fibroblasts to <10 mg/mL methanol inhibited their growth by <20%, with an extrapolated LD50 of 100 mg/mL. A parallel exposure to formaldehyde, a spontaneous metabolite of methanol, yielded LD50 of 20 microg/mL and eradication of viability at 300 microg/mL.

CONCLUSIONS

These results indicate that skin from a carefully monitored MP donor is suitable for banking toward massive burns and skin losses. This methodology may be applied to approve skin harvested from other types of poisoned donors for banking and future grafting.

Short- and long-term success of organs transplanted from acute methanol poisoned donors

BACKGROUND

The shortage of organs for transplantation has made it necessary to extend the criteria for the selection of donors, among others including those patients who die because of toxic substances such as methanol. Methanol is a toxic which is distributed through all the systems and viscera of the organism and tends to cause a severe metabolic acidosis. It can specifically cause serious or irreversible lesions of the central nervous system (CNS) and retina, and ultimately brain death. We present our experience with 16 organ donors who died as a result of acute methanol intoxication in 10 Spanish hospitals over the last 14 yr.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Between October 1985 and July 1999, 16 organ donors with brain death caused by acute methanol intoxication, 13 females and three males with a mean age of 38.4 +/- 7.6 yr (interval: 26-55 yr), allowed 37 elective transplants to be performed: 29 kidneys, four hearts and four livers for 37 recipients, and one urgent liver transplantation to a recipient with fulminant hepatitis.

RESULTS

The immediate postoperative period was favourable for the 38 graft recipients. None of the graft recipients presented gap anion metabolic acidosis in the immediate postoperative period, nor symptomatology or lesions of the CNS characteristic of methanol intoxication. Two patients died during the first month post-transplantation, a liver recipient and a heart recipient, at 16 and 24 days, respectively, because of acute rejection of the graft. At 1 month after transplantation 35 of the 36 recipients had been discharged from hospital with normal-functioning grafts. The last of the recipients, a kidney recipient, was discharged at 6 wk with normal-functioning graft. Actuarial survival of the graft and patient of kidney recipients at 1, 3 and 5 yr was 92.6, 77.8, and 75%, and 100, 88.9 and 83.3%, respectively; with average serum creatinines of 139.9 +/- 42.9, 150.4 +/- 42.8, and 164.4 +/- 82.5 micromol/L, respectively. At 1 yr after transplantation the three heart recipients and two of the three liver recipients had normal-functioning graft.

CONCLUSIONS

Methanol intoxication is not transferred from the donor to the recipient. The survival of the graft and kidney, heart and liver recipients using organs from donors who die because of methanol does not differ in the short- and long-term from the transplants performed with organs from donors who die from other causes.

Successful cardiac transplantation with methanol or carbon monoxide-poisoned donors

BACKGROUND

Patients succumbing to methanol or carbon monoxide poisoning are usually rejected for heart donation. Increasing demand for donors has lead to the expansion of acceptance criteria and increased use of the marginal donor.

METHODS

We transplanted hearts from donors who had had methanol intoxication in three cases and carbon monoxide exposure in two cases. Standard donor evaluation criteria and transplantation techniques were used.

RESULTS

All of the transplants were successful. Three of the recipients required significant inotropic support for a few days postoperatively; however, all of the hearts functioned well over the intermediate and long term. Two recipients (1 from each group) died of complications other than heart failure (1.5 and 2 years postoperatively).

CONCLUSIONS

Successful heart transplantation can be achieved using the hearts from patients succumbing to methanol or carbon monoxide poisoning. Routine evaluation of cardiac function and myocardial damage is adequate for screening these donors. Hearts from methanol-poisoning victims may require longer inotropic support postoperatively before complete recovery, but can provide excellent long-term function and results.

Pancreatic injury following acute methanol poisoning

BACKGROUND

Methanol ingestion is a cause of potentially life-threatening poisoning with numerous systemic manifestations. Clinicians may overlook the possibility of acute pancreatitis in this setting. The objective of this paper is to document the incidence of this complication in a series of 22 patients and to discuss the respective role of methanol and ethanol in its pathogenesis.

CASE REPORT

A 54-year-old woman developed acute necrotizing pancreatitis following acute methanol poisoning. She was treated by hemodialysis, ethanol infusion, and folinic acid, but, despite maximal supportive therapy, she died from multiple organ failure 54 hours after the ingestion.

CASE SERIES

In a series of 22 consecutive patients admitted with a diagnosis of acute methanol poisoning, we found evidence of pancreatic damage in 11 patients. The abnormalities were present from admission and before ethanol therapy in 7 cases and developed after ethanol therapy in 4 cases. Seven patients had a history of chronic ethanol abuse, but no patient had previously suffered from acute or chronic pancreatitis. Three patients presented moderate-to-severe acute pancreatitis according to clinical and radiological criteria and required aggressive supportive therapy including peritoneal dialysis. One patient died from the direct consequences of acute necrotizing pancreatitis and 2 fully recovered from this event. Three patients evolved to brain death; autopsy revealed hemorrhagic lesions in the pancreas in only 1 case.

CONCLUSIONS

Clinical, biological, and radiographic signs of acute pancreatic injury may be more common than previously realized. Acute methanol poisoning appears to produce pancreatic injury, although antidotal treatment with ethanol or prior chronic ethanol abuse may be contributing factors. Because ethanol treatment may complicate the pancreatic injury, fomepizole (4-methylpyrazole) may be the preferable antidote in acute methanol poisoning.