Improvement of glucose/insulin metabolism reduces hypertension in insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus recipients of kidney-pancreas transplantation

Regenerative therapies for diabetic microangiopathy

Hyperglycaemia occurring in diabetes is responsible for accelerated arterial remodeling and atherosclerosis, affecting the macro- and the microcirculatory system. Vessel injury is mainly related to deregulation of glucose homeostasis and insulin/insulin-precursors production, generation of advanced glycation end-products, reduction in nitric oxide synthesis, and oxidative and reductive stress. It occurs both at extracellular level with increased calcium and matrix proteins deposition and at intracellular level, with abnormalities of intracellular pathways and increased cell death. Peripheral arterial disease, coronary heart disease, and ischemic stroke are the main causes of morbidity/mortality in diabetic patients representing a major clinical and economic issue. Pharmacological therapies, administration of growth factors, and stem cellular strategies are the most effective approaches and will be discussed in depth in this comprehensive review covering the regenerative therapies of diabetic microangiopathy.

Lessons learned from more than 1,000 pancreas transplants at a single institution

OBJECTIVE

To determine outcome in diabetic pancreas transplant recipients according to risk factors and the surgical techniques and immunosuppressive protocols that evolved during a 33-year period at a single institution.

SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA

Insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus is associated with a high incidence of management problems and secondary complications. Clinical pancreas transplantation began at the University of Minnesota in 1966, initially with a high failure rate, but outcome improved in parallel with other organ transplants. The authors retrospectively analyzed the factors associated with the increased success rate of pancreas transplants.

METHODS

From December 16, 1966, to March 31, 2000, the authors performed 1,194 pancreas transplants (111 from living donors; 191 retransplants): 498 simultaneous pancreas-kidney (SPK) and 1 simultaneous pancreas-liver transplant; 404 pancreas after kidney (PAK) transplants; and 291 pancreas transplants alone (PTA). The analyses were divided into five eras: era 0, 1966 to 1973 (n = 14), historical; era 1, 1978 to 1986 (n = 148), transition to cyclosporine for immunosuppression, multiple duct management techniques, and only solitary (PAK and PTA) transplants; era 2, 1986 to 1994 (n = 461), all categories (SPK, PAK, and PTA), predominantly bladder drainage for graft duct management, and primarily triple therapy (cyclosporine, azathioprine, and prednisone) for maintenance immunosuppression; era 3, 1994 to 1998 (n = 286), tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil used; and era 4, 1998 to 2000 (n = 275), use of daclizumab for induction immunosuppression, primarily enteric drainage for SPK transplants, pretransplant immunosuppression in candidates awaiting PTA.

RESULTS

Patient and primary cadaver pancreas graft functional (insulin-independence) survival rates at 1 year by category and era were as follows: SPK, era 2 (n = 214) versus eras 3 and 4 combined (n = 212), 85% and 64% versus 92% and 79%, respectively; PAK, era 1 (n = 36) versus 2 (n = 61) versus 3 (n = 84) versus 4 (n = 92), 86% and 17%, 98% and 59%, 98% and 76%, and 98% and 81%, respectively; in PTA, era 1 (n = 36) versus 2 (n = 72) versus 3 (n = 30) versus 4 (n = 40), 77% and 31%, 99% and 50%, 90% and 67%, and 100% and 88%, respectively. In eras 3 and 4 combined for primary cadaver SPK transplants, pancreas graft survival rates were significantly higher with bladder drainage (n = 136) than enteric drainage (n = 70), 82% versus 74% at 1 year (P =.03). Increasing recipient age had an adverse effect on outcome only in SPK recipients. Vascular disease was common (in eras 3 and 4, 27% of SPK recipients had a pretransplant myocardial infarction and 40% had a coronary artery bypass); those with no vascular disease had significantly higher patient and graft survival rates in the SPK and PAK categories. Living donor segmental pancreas transplants were associated with higher technically successful graft survival rates in each era, predominately solitary (PAK and PTA) in eras 1 and 2 and SPK in eras 3 and 4. Diabetic secondary complications were ameliorated in some recipients, and quality of life studies showed significant gains after the transplant in all recipient categories.

CONCLUSIONS

Patient and graft survival rates have significantly improved over time as surgical techniques and immunosuppressive protocols have evolved. Eventually, islet transplants will replace pancreas transplants for suitable candidates, but currently pancreas transplants can be applied and should be an option at all stages of diabetes. Early transplants are preferable for labile diabetes, but even patients with advanced complications can benefit.

Trends and perspectives in pancreas and simultaneous pancreas and kidney transplantation

Pancreas transplantation is still the best option to achieve normoglycaemia and insulin independence in patients with type I diabetes. As a result of improvements in surgical techniques, immunosuppression and patient selection, one year survival rates of 95, 83, and 88% for patient, pancreas, and kidney survival, respectively, are reported for patients with simultaneous pancreas and kidney transplantation. The main goals for the future are to reduce postoperative morbidity, to identify the relevant indications for single pancreas transplantation, to adopt the best surgical technique for individual patients' needs (bladder versus enteric drainage with or without portal venous delivery of insulin), and to develop immunosuppressive strategies with low nephrotoxic and diabetogenic potential.

Patient survival and cardiovascular events after kidney-pancreas transplantation: comparison with kidney transplantation alone in uremic IDDM patients

In diabetic patients cardiovascular morbidity and mortality is still a major problem. Our aim was to study the effect of kidney-pancreas transplantation on survival, cardiovascular events, and causes of death in diabetic type 1 uremic patients. Three hundred and thirty-three uremic IDDM patients were enrolled in our waiting list for kidney-pancreas transplantation: 107 underwent kidney-pancreas transplantation (KP), 34 underwent kidney transplantation alone (KA), whereas 192 patients remained on dialysis (WL). Actuarial survival and causes of death were recorded over a period of 7 years. Seven-year survival rate was 75% for the KP group, 63% for the KA group, and 37% for the WL group (p = 0.001). Cardiovascular death rate was 9.8% in the KP group, 17.6% in the KA group, and 18.1% in the WL group (KP vs. WL, p = 0.05). Rate of acute myocardial infarction in the KP group was lower than in the KA group (2.4% vs. 17.6%, p = 0.005) as well as rate of acute pulmonary edema (0.8% vs. 23.5%, p = 0.0001) and rate of hypertensive patients at 1 (40.9% vs. 85.0%, p = 0.0001) and at 2 years (57.6% vs. 80%, p = 0.03). Kidney-pancreas transplant helped to obtain euglycemia with positive effects on survival and cardiovascular events.

Simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation in the mycophenolate mofetil/tacrolimus era: evolution from induction therapy with bladder drainage to noninduction therapy with enteric drainage

BACKGROUND

In the past, enteric drainage or the omission of induction immunotherapy has been shown to be predictive of suboptimal outcomes of simultaneous pancreas-kidney (SPK) transplantation. We have reassessed the need for bladder drainage and induction immunotherapy to optimize the outcome of SPK transplantation.

METHODS

One hundred consecutive recipients of SPK transplants who received mycophenolate mofetil and tacrolimus immunosuppression were studied. The first 50 recipients had bladder-drained pancreas allografts and received induction immunotherapy. The results were compared with the next 50 recipients who had enteric-drained pancreas allografts, which included a subgroup (n = 17 patients) who were randomized to receive no induction immunotherapy.

RESULTS

The 1-year actuarial patient, kidney, and pancreas survival rates in the bladder-drainage group were 98.0%, 94.0%, and 94.0%, respectively. The 1-year actuarial patient, kidney, and pancreas survival rates in the enteric-drainage group were 96.8%, 96.8%, and 89.4%, respectively. In the enteric-drainage group, the incidence of rejection at 1 year was 6.1% in recipients who received induction therapy versus 23.5% in recipients who did not receive induction therapy. The average number of readmissions per recipient was 1.8 in the bladder-drainage group versus 0.9 in the enteric-drainage group.

CONCLUSIONS

Primary enteric drainage of the pancreas allograft in recipients of SPK transplantation is the preferred surgical technique in the tacrolimus/mycophenolate mofetil era.

Hypertension after pancreas-kidney transplantation: role of bladder versus enteric pancreatic drainage

BACKGROUND

Recent reports suggest that hypertension may be less common after simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation than after kidney transplantation alone. However, the mechanisms for this beneficial effect have not been delineated. We hypothesize that lower blood pressures may result from chronic volume depletion in patients with bladder-drained pancreatic allografts.

METHODS

We compared the incidence and severity of hypertension 12 months after transplantation in 79 bladder-drained pancreas-kidney recipients and 46 diabetic kidney-only recipients. These two groups were compared with a smaller group of enterically drained pancreas-kidney recipients. Blood pressure was also compared before and after surgical conversion from bladder to enteric drainage in 10 patients.

RESULTS

Hypertension was significantly less common and less severe after pancreas-kidney transplantation than after kidney transplantation alone, but the benefit of the pancreas transplant was evident only in bladder-drained patients. Logistic regression analysis of the bladder-drained pancreas-kidney patients confirmed the independent impact of the pancreatic allograft on the presence of hypertension, indicated an independent association with serum creatinine concentration and donor age, but suggested no correlation with recipient age, race, or number of rejection episodes. A comparison of blood pressures before and after pancreatic conversion from bladder to enteric drainage indicated no significant change in the prevalence or severity of hypertension.

CONCLUSIONS

We conclude that the beneficial effect of a pancreas transplant on the prevalence and severity of hypertension after simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation is limited to bladder-drained patients. Although it is possible that the effect is mediated by chronic volume depletion, the observation that blood pressure does not increase after conversion from bladder to enteric drainage suggests that other factors may be involved.

Mycophenolate mofetil and tacrolimus as primary maintenance immunosuppression in simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation: initial experience in 50 consecutive cases

BACKGROUND

The current study examines the use of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) and tacrolimus as primary immunosuppression in simultaneous pancreas-kidney (SPK) transplantation. In addition, analyses of the rates of conversion from one immunosuppressive agent to another, and its subsequent consequences with respect to outcomes were determined. Quality of graft function, infections, and effect on preexisting essential hypertension are also described.

METHODS

Immunosuppression consisted of quadruple therapy with antithymocyte globulin induction, tacrolimus, MMF, and prednisone. Patient and graft survival and rejection rates in 50 consecutive SPK recipients, followed for a minimum of 3 months and a mean of 14 months (range: 3-34 months), are described.

RESULTS

Thirty-nine of 50 (78%) patients tolerated the MMF/tacrolimus combination long-term (mean duration of follow-up: 14+/-7 months). Nine of 50 patients (18%) were converted to Neoral, and 4 patients were converted to azathioprine as a substitute for MMF. The 2-year actuarial patient, kidney, and pancreas survival rates were 97.7%, 93.3%, and 90.0%, respectively. At 6 months after transplant, the overall incidence of acute rejection was 16%. There was a statistically significant (P< or =0.04, Cox-Mantel test) difference in the rate of rejection associated with conversion to Neoral. The incidence of rejection 6 months after transplant in the group maintained on MMF/tacrolimus was 10.2% vs. 44.4% in the group converted to Neoral (P< or =0.04, Cox-Mantel test). Overall, the 1-year actuarial cumulative incidence of tissue-invasive cytomegalovirus disease was 6.6%. There were no cases of fungal infections or post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorders. One patient developed Kaposi's sarcoma 10 months after transplant. With respect to hypertensive disease, 60% (12/20) of the patients who required pharmacologic control of blood pressure before transplant were off all antihypertensive medications at 1 year after transplant. An additional 20% (4/20) of patients had a reduction in the number of medications required to control blood pressure at 1 year after transplant.

CONCLUSIONS

We conclude that the combination of MMF and tacrolimus as primary immunosuppression for SPK transplantation results in excellent patient and graft survival rates, a very low rate of acute rejection, and low rates of infection and malignancy.