Carbohydrate deficient transferrin for detection of alcohol relapse after orthotopic liver transplantation for alcoholic cirrhosis

Follow-Up of Alcohol Consumption After Liver Transplantation: Interest of an Addiction Team?

BACKGROUND

Alcohol relapses after liver transplantation (LT) constitute a critical issue. Because there is no widely accepted definition of LT, its prevalence varies from 7 to 95% across studies. Only a severe relapse, the frequency of which is estimated to be 11 to 26%, decreases life expectancy after 5 years of LT and requires specific care. To improve the early identification of alcohol consumption among transplanted patients, liver transplant teams may be helped by input from an addiction team. Nevertheless, added benefit of involvement by addiction specialists in treating posttransplant patients has not been demonstrated. Thus, the aim of this study was to compare the evaluation of the alcohol consumption after LT performed routinely during the transplant consultation or obtained from a specific addiction consultation.

METHODS

This was a prospective single-site study. Patients were seen consecutively by their hepatologist and by an addiction specialist, and they completed the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test-Consumption (AUDIT-C). Thus, the patient's alcohol status was assessed using 3 different sources of information: the hepatologist's interview, the AUDIT-C score, and the addiction specialist visit.

RESULTS

One hundred forty-one patients were consecutively evaluated. Alcohol consumption was identified by the hepatologist in 31 patients (21.9%), in 52 (36.8%) using the AUDIT-C questionnaire, and in 58 (41.1%) by the addiction specialist. The 31 patients concerned reported an average of 6.5 alcohol units/wk to the transplant physician, a number which was significantly greater (p = 0.001) by 8.6 units/wk when they were interviewed by the addiction specialist.

CONCLUSIONS

This study highlights the clinical utility of a systematic addiction consultation among liver transplant patients, irrespective of the reason for transplantation.

Severe alcoholic relapse after liver transplantation: What consequences on the graft? A study based on liver biopsies analysis

Alcoholic liver disease (ALD) is a major indication for liver transplantation (LT), but up to 20% of patients experience severe alcoholic relapse. The aims of this study were to evaluate the impact of severe alcoholic relapse on the graft (based on histological examination) and to identify predictive factors associated with recurrent alcoholic cirrhosis (RAC). From 1990 to 2010, 369 patients underwent LT for ALD at Edouard Herriot Hospital (Lyon, France) and survived more than 1 year. All patients who presented severe alcoholic relapse and histological follow-up were included. Liver biopsies were performed at 1 and 5 years and at every 5 years after LT, and when clinically indicated. The median follow-up after LT was 11 years (range, 3-18 years). Severe alcoholic relapse was observed in 73 (20%) of the 369 patients, from whom 56 patients with histological evaluation were included. RAC was diagnosed in 18 (32%) of the 56 patients included, which represents 5% of the 369 patients transplanted for ALD. The median delay between LT and RAC was 6 years (range, 3-10 years) and 4.5 years (range, 2-8 years) after severe alcoholic relapse. The median cumulated years of alcohol use before RAC was 3.5 years (range, 2-7 years). The cumulative risk for F4 fibrosis was 15% at 3 years, 32% at 5 years, and 54% at 10 years after severe alcoholic relapse. A young age at LT (≤50 years old) and an early onset of heavy drinking (within the first 3 years after LT) were associated with RAC. In conclusion, severe alcoholic relapse usually occurs in the first years after LT and is responsible for accelerated severe graft injury. Liver Transplantation 22 773-784 2016 AASLD.

Biomolecules and Biomarkers Used in Diagnosis of Alcohol Drinking and in Monitoring Therapeutic Interventions

BACKGROUND

The quantitative, measurable detection of drinking is important for the successful treatment of alcohol misuse in transplantation of patients with alcohol disorders, people living with human immunodeficiency virus that need to adhere to medication, and special occupational hazard offenders, many of whom continually deny drinking. Their initial misconduct usually leads to medical problems associated with drinking, impulsive social behavior, and drunk driving. The accurate identification of alcohol consumption via biochemical tests contributes significantly to the monitoring of drinking behavior.

METHODS

A systematic review of the current methods used to measure biomarkers of alcohol consumption was conducted using PubMed and Google Scholar databases (2010-2015). The names of the tests have been identified. The methods and publications that correlate between the social instruments and the biochemical tests were further investigated. There is a clear need for assays standardization to ensure the use of these biochemical tests as routine biomarkers.

FINDINGS

Alcohol ingestion can be measured using a breath test. Because alcohol is rapidly eliminated from the circulation, the time for detection by this analysis is in the range of hours. Alcohol consumption can alternatively be detected by direct measurement of ethanol concentration in blood or urine. Several markers have been proposed to extend the interval and sensitivities of detection, including ethyl glucuronide and ethyl sulfate in urine, phosphatidylethanol in blood, and ethyl glucuronide and fatty acid ethyl esters in hair, among others. Moreover, there is a need to correlate the indirect biomarker carbohydrate deficient transferrin, which reflects longer lasting consumption of higher amounts of alcohol, with serum γ-glutamyl transpeptidase, another long term indirect biomarker that is routinely used and standardized in laboratory medicine.

Assessment of alcohol consumption in liver transplant candidates and recipients: the best combination of the tools available

The detection of alcohol consumption in liver transplant candidates (LTCs) and liver transplant recipients (LTRs) is required to enable a proper assessment of transplant eligibility and early management of alcohol relapse, respectively. In this clinical setting, urinary ethyl glucuronide (uEtG), the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test for Alcohol Consumption (AUDIT-c), serum ethanol, urinary ethanol, carbohydrate-deficient transferrin (CDT), and other indirect markers of alcohol consumption were evaluated and compared prospectively in 121 LTCs and LTRs. Alcohol consumption was diagnosed when AUDIT-c results were positive or it was confirmed by a patient's history in response to abnormal results. Alcohol consumption was found in 30.6% of the patients. uEtG was found to be the strongest marker of alcohol consumption (odds ratio = 414.5, P < 0.001) and provided a more accurate prediction rate of alcohol consumption [area under receiving operating characteristic (ROC) curve = 0.94] than CDT (area under ROC curve = 0.63, P < 0.001) and AUDIT-c (area under ROC curve = 0.73, P < 0.001). The combination of uEtG and AUDIT-c showed higher accuracy in detecting alcohol consumption in comparison with the combination of CDT and AUDIT-c (area under ROC curve = 0.98 versus 0.80, P < 0.001). Furthermore, uEtG was the most useful marker for detecting alcohol consumption in patients with negative AUDIT-c results. In conclusion, the combination of AUDIT-c and uEtG improves the detection of alcohol consumption in LTCs and LTRs. Therefore, they should be used routinely for these patients.

Abusive drinking after liver transplantation is associated with allograft loss and advanced allograft fibrosis

In patients who undergo liver transplantation for alcoholic liver disease (ALD), alcohol relapse is common. A return to abusive or excessive drinking likely decreases overall survival; however, the effects of alcohol use on allograft outcomes and histopathology are less well defined. We reviewed all cases of liver transplantation with ALD as an indication between January 1, 1995 and December 31, 2007. Allograft outcomes and histopathological results were compared for patients who relapsed into alcohol use and patients who maintained abstinence. Three hundred patients who underwent transplantation for ALD during this period survived at least 1 year, and 48 (16.0%) relapsed into alcohol use that came to clinical attention. The pattern of relapse was a single event for 10 patients (20.8%), intermittent relapses for 22 patients (45.8%), and continuous heavy drinking for 16 patients (33.3%). Continuous heavy drinking was associated with allograft loss in a univariate Cox proportional hazards analysis [hazard ratio (HR) = 2.43, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.26-4.68, P = 0.008] and in a multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression (HR = 2.57, 95% CI = 1.32-5.00, P = 0.006). A matched-pair analysis that controlled for the hepatitis C virus status and the time to biopsy compared the results of allograft histopathology for patients who relapsed into alcohol use and patients who maintained abstinence. Significant steatosis [odds ratio (OR) = 3.46, 95% CI = 1.29-9.31, P = 0.01], steatohepatitis (OR = 6.2, 95% CI = 1.70-22.71, P = 0.006), and advanced (stage 3 or higher) fibrosis (OR = 23.18, 95% CI = 3.01-177.30, P = 0.003) were associated with alcohol relapse. In conclusion, alcohol relapse after liver transplantation (particularly heavy drinking) is associated with decreased graft survival and advanced allograft fibrosis.

Assessing the drinking status of liver transplant patients with alcoholic liver disease

The accurate assessment of drinking by patients with alcoholic liver disease is important both before and after liver transplantation. Unfortunately, self-reports by these individuals often underestimate their actual alcohol consumption. Several recently developed biochemical measures can provide additional information on a patient's use of alcohol. This article describes ethyl glucuronide, ethyl sulfate, phosphatidyl ethanol, and carbohydrate-deficient transferrin as biomarkers of drinking and summarizes research dealing with their application in patients with alcohol use disorders who are candidates for or recipients of liver transplantation. The article also offers suggestions for enhancing the reliability of self-report measures of drinking status.

Living donor liver transplantation for patients with alcoholic liver disease

Backgrounds/Aims

Since most transplantation studies for alcoholic liver disease (ALD) were performed on deceased donor liver transplantation, little was known following living donor liver transplantation (LDLT).

Methods

The clinical outcome of 18 ALD patients who underwent LDLT from Febraury 1997 to December 2004 in a large-volume liver transplantation center was assessed retrospectively.

Results

The model for end-stage liver disease score was 23±11, and mean pretransplant abstinence period was 16±13 months, with 14 (77.8%) patients being abstinent for at least 6 months. Graft types were right lobe grafts in 11, left lobe grafts in 2 and dual grafts in 5. Graft to recipient body weight ratio was 0.94±0.16. The relapse rates in patients who did and did not maintain 6 months of abstinence were 7.1% and 50%, respectively (p=0.097). Younger recipient age was a significant risk factor for alcohol relapse (p=0.027). Five recipients with antibody to hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) received core antibody-positive liver graft, but two of them showed positive HBsAg seroconversion. Overall 5-year patient survival rate following LDLT was 87.8%, with a 5-year relapse rate of 16.7%.

Conclusions

Pretransplant abstinence for 6 months appears to be benefical for preventing posttransplant relapse. Life-long prophylactic measure should be followed after use of anti-HBc-positive liver grafts regardless of hepatitis B viral marker status of the recipient.

Liver transplantation for patients with alcoholic liver disease: an open question

End-stage alcoholic liver disease is a recognised indication for liver transplantation but some questions on the matter remain open. It is difficult to quantify alcohol consumption, and a single definition of post-transplant relapse is lacking. Moreover, there are no internationally accepted criteria for the selection of candidates for liver transplantation and the eligibility parameters for these patients are controversial. Additional clinical and psychological evaluations are necessary in this setting, especially to establish the risk of alcohol relapse. Nevertheless, patient and graft survival rates after liver transplantation in alcoholic liver disease are comparable to those after transplant for other aetiologies, alcohol consumption relapse being one of the most important problems in the post-transplant phase. In conclusion, alcohol-related liver disease is a good indication for liver transplantation. The main future goals are to formulate a well-defined pre-transplant approach and a single definition of alcohol relapse and to improve prevention strategies.

Trajectories of alcohol consumption following liver transplantation

Any use of alcohol in the years following liver transplantation (LTX) approaches 50% of patients transplanted for alcoholic liver disease (ALD). We collected detailed prospective data on alcohol consumption following LTX for ALD to investigate ongoing patterns of use. Using trajectory modeling we identified four distinct alcohol use trajectories. One group had minimal use over time. Two other groups developed early onset moderate-to-heavy consumption and one group developed late onset moderate use. These trajectories demonstrate that alcohol use varies based on timing of onset, quantity and duration. Using discriminant function analysis, we examine characteristics of recipient's pre-LTX alcohol histories and early post-LTX psychological stressors to identify the profile of those at risk for these specific trajectories. We discuss the relevance of these findings to clinical care and preliminarily to outcomes.

Comparison of alcohol-dependent patients at a gastroenterological and a psychiatric ward according to the Lesch alcoholism typology: implications for treatment

AIMS

To assess the clinical and biological status of alcohol-dependent patients admitted to a psychiatric or a gastroenterological ward, assessing and comparing dimensions important for prescribing treatment for withdrawal and relapse prevention.

METHODS

Eighty patients, alcohol-dependent according to international classification of diseases tenth revision and diagnostic and statistical manual, text revised, version IV, admitted to the Vienna General Hospital between January 2005 and  November 2006, were examined, of whom 44 were admitted to the psychiatric ward and 36 to the gastroenterological ward. Dimensions of alcohol dependence were assessed using a computerized structured interview, the Lesch alcoholism typology (LAT). Biological markers and the model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) score defined the severity of alcohol-related physical disturbances.

RESULTS

As might be expected, gastroenterological patients had more advanced physical diseases than psychiatric patients, and affective disorders and suicidal tendencies were significantly commoner among the psychiatric patients. Thus, LAT Type II patients were overrepresented at the gastroenterological ward and LAT Type III patients at the psychiatric ward.

CONCLUSION

The severity of somatic diseases and psychiatric disorders as well as the distribution of the four types according to Lesch differ between alcohol-dependent patients admitted to a psychiatric ward or a gastroenterological ward. Regarding the positive long-term outcome, different evidence-based medical treatment approaches for withdrawal and relapse prevention are needed for these patients.

Trajectories of alcohol consumption following liver transplantation

Any use of alcohol in the years following liver transplantation (LTX) approaches 50% of patients transplanted for alcoholic liver disease (ALD). We collected detailed prospective data on alcohol consumption following LTX for ALD to investigate ongoing patterns of use. Using trajectory modeling we identified four distinct alcohol use trajectories. One group had minimal use over time. Two other groups developed early onset moderate-to-heavy consumption and one group developed late onset moderate use. These trajectories demonstrate that alcohol use varies based on timing of onset, quantity and duration. Using discriminant function analysis, we examine characteristics of recipient's pre-LTX alcohol histories and early post-LTX psychological stressors to identify the profile of those at risk for these specific trajectories. We discuss the relevance of these findings to clinical care and preliminarily to outcomes.

Recurrent nonviral liver disease following liver transplantation

Recurrent disease after liver transplantation is well recognized and remains a potential cause of premature graft loss. The rates of recurrence are difficult to establish because of the lack of consistency in diagnostic criteria and approaches to diagnosis. Owing to the fact that recurrent parenchymal disease may occur in the presence of normal liver tests, those centers that use protocol biopsies will report greater rates of recurrence. It is important to recognize that rates of recurrence vary according to indication and show little correlation with rates of graft loss from recurrent disease. Recurrance rates are greatest for primary sclerosing cholangitis and autoimmune hepatitis, and low reccurrance rates are reported for alcoholic liver disease and recurrent primary biliary cirrhosis. The impact of recurrent nonalcoholic fatty liver disease is not yet clear. Patients and clinicians need to be aware of the possibility of recurrent disease in the differential diagnosis of abnormal liver tests, and management stategies may require alteration to reduce the impact of disease recurrence on outcome. Finally, an understanding of which diseases do recur after transplantation and identification of the risk factors may lead to a better understanding of the pathogenetic mechanisms of these conditions.

Negative impact of de novo malignancies rather than alcohol relapse on survival after liver transplantation for alcoholic cirrhosis: a retrospective analysis of 305 patients in a single center

OBJECTIVES

Alcoholic liver disease is a leading indication for liver transplantation (LT). The aim of this study was to evaluate long-term results and survival prognostic factors of LT in this indication from a large cohort of patients.

METHODS

From October 1990 to October 2005, 305 consecutive patients with alcoholic cirrhosis (from 594 patients presenting with cirrhosis, i.e., 51.3%) underwent LT in our center. There were 229 men and 76 women, with a median age of 50 yr (range 30-68). Clinical and biological variables with possible prognostic value were analyzed.

RESULTS

Global survival rate was 92.6% at 1 yr, 88.5% at 3 yr, 84.3% at 5 yr, and 73.4% at 10 yr, and was similar (P=0.78, log-rank test) to that of patients transplanted for other cirrhosis (88.8% at 1 yr, 84.1% at 3 yr, 80.6% at 5 yr, and 74.7% at 10 yr). Recurrence of alcohol consumption was observed in 37 patients (12.1%). De novo cancer occurred in 35 patients after LT (11.5%). Univariate analysis disclosed that male gender, history of smoking, and de novo carcinoma were significant survival prognostic factors (P<0.05, log-rank test).

CONCLUSIONS

Our results strongly confirm that alcoholic liver disease is an excellent indication for LT, but long-term survival is reduced because of other target-organ damage of both alcohol and tobacco, especially aero-digestive malignancies, which are greater causes of morbidity and mortality than is recurrent alcohol liver disease.

Recurrence of nonviral diseases

As long-term graft survival and mortality after liver transplantation improve, recognition that allografts may be affected by the same disease process that resulted in the failure of the liver is of both clinical and academic importance. Recipients need to be counseled about recurrence and potential impact on graft function and graft survival; clinicians need to be aware of the potential of recurrence to interpret the clinical, laboratory, radiologic, and histologic findings and alter management. Understanding which conditions recur in the allograft and factors associated with recurrence may shed light on pathogenesis. This article discusses the recurrence of nonviral diseases after liver transplantation, diagnosis, and management.

Efficacy of 6-Month Pretransplant Abstinence for Patients With Alcoholic Liver Disease Undergoing Living Donor Liver Transplantation

PURPOSE

Questions have been raised regarding the ethics of liver transplantation in patients with alcoholic liver disease (ALD), including the fairness of cadaveric organ allocation to individuals who abuse alcohol and the efficacy of transplantation in these patients, many of whom may relapse. Living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) for ALD patients raises the similar ethical issues. ALD candidates for cadaveric liver transplants are required to abstain from alcohol for 6 months before being listed, but the efficacy of 6 months of abstinence in ALD patients receiving LDLT is not known.

METHODS

We therefore determined the efficacy of 6 months of pretransplant abstinence in 15 ALD patients who underwent LDLT from February 1997 to December 2003.

RESULTS

The Model for End-stage Liver Disease score was 24 +/- 10, and mean pretransplant abstinence period was 15 +/- 13 months, with 11 (73.3%) patients being abstinent for at least 6 months. Four patients received dual grafts, making the number of living donors 19: 12 children, two wives, one brother, three nephews, and one aunt. There were no unrelated donors. Three patients showed a relapse to alcohol drinking. The overall 1-, 3-, and 5-year survival rates were 100%, 100%, and 87.5%, respectively, and the cumulative 1-, 3-, and 5-year relapse rates were 6.7%, 20%, and 20%, respectively. The relapse rates in patients who did and did not maintain 6 months of abstinence were 9.1% and 50%, respectively; this difference was not significant (P = .154), likely due to the small sample size. Younger recipient age was a significant risk factor for alcohol relapse (40 +/- 8 years versus 53 +/- 6 years; P = .004).

CONCLUSIONS

Pretransplant abstinence of 6 months seemed to be beneficial. For ethical reasons, a 6-month abstinence rule should be strictly observed in LDLT.

Exclusion of trisialo-transferrin from carbohydrate-deficient transferrin measurement: advantage in patients with chronic liver disease?

BACKGROUND

Biological markers for chronic alcohol consumption like MCV or gammaGT or carbohydrate deficient transferrin (CDT) are useful, but far from being perfect. In patients with liver disease a reliable marker for chronic alcohol consumption as the underlying etiology is highly needed. Recently, a new ELISA based version of the carbohydrate-deficient-transferrin (CDT-TRISIALO (-)) assay has been developed, which measures asialo-, monosialo- and disialo transferrin, but excludes trisialo- transferrin; that modification suggests higher sensitivity and specificity in detecting recent alcohol consumption in patients.

AIMS

The study goal was to evaluate the sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predicitive value of this new carbohydrate-deficient-transferrin assay (CDT-TRISIALO (-)) in a group of patients with liver disease and to compare the results with that of the established CDT assay (CDT-TRISIALO (+)).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Our study population consisted of 110 consecutive patients (male: n = 80 [72.7 %], female: n = 30 [27.3 %]) with liver disease of the following etiologies: chronic alcohol consumption (n = 51 [46.4 %]; Out of them 30 alcohol abusing patients were assessed by cage = 1 and 21 alcohol dependent patients were assessed by cage = 2, chronic viral hepatitis (n = 33 [30.0 %]) including 25 [22.7 %] patients with chronic hepatitis C infection and 8 [7.3 %] patients with chronic hepatitis B infection), haemochromatosis (n = 4 [3.6 %]), mechanical cholestasis (n = 17 [15.5 %]) and other liver diseases (n = 5 [4.6 %] including autoimmune hepatitis (n = 2) and primary biliary cirrhosis (n = 3)). 27.3 % of our patients (n = 30) had no liver cirrhosis whereas the majority (72.7 %, n = 80) had liver cirrhosis.

RESULTS

In our population of liver disease patients the CDT-TRISIALO (-) assay had a sensitivity of 72.7 % and specificity of 58.1 % for recent alcohol consumption at the published cutoff level of 2.6 %. The positive predictive value was 34.0 % and the negative predictive value was 87.8 %. Sensitivity and specificity of the CDT-TRISIALO (+) assay at the recommended cutoff level of 4.7 % were similar, 77.3 % and 49.3 %, respectively. The positive and negative predictive values were 30.9 % and 88.1 %. CDTTRISIALO (+) and CDT-TRISIALO (-) levels increased significantly with higher Child-Pugh stages.

CONCLUSION

The newly developed carbohydrate deficient transferrin test (CDT-TRISIALO (-)) is of no advantage as compared to the established assay (CDT-TRISIALO (+)) when used in a patient population with liver disease. In that population, normal CDT-TRISIALO (-) helps to exclude recent alcohol consumption; this results from the high negative predictive value of a normal CDT-TRISIALO (-).

Alcohol recidivism impairs long-term patient survival after orthotopic liver transplantation for alcoholic liver disease

The aim of this study was to evaluate the rate of alcohol recidivism after orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) for alcoholic liver disease (ALD) and its influence on the allograft and patient survival, as well as the development of comorbidities and de novo cancers. The study was performed on 54 subjects previously analyzed and transplanted in our center for ALD, whose follow-up was prolonged to a mean of 99.2 (SD 31.7) months (range, 14-155). Medical records were reviewed, and data on alcohol consumption, therapeutic compliance, graft evolution, rejection, infections, comorbidities, rates of de novo malignancies and other clinical events, and survival were collected. Comparisons between groups were performed by the Fisher's exact test, and survival was assessed by the Kaplan-Meier method. Survival curves were compared using the Mantel-Cox statistic. The risk of death resulting from alcohol recidivism was analyzed with a Cox proportional hazards model. Fourteen patients who underwent transplantation for ALD (25.9%) returned to alcohol use between 5.0 and 86.9 months after OLT (median, 47.5). There was no significant association between the presence or absence of alcohol recidivism and the occurrence of graft rejection, infections, associated comorbidities after OLT, or compliance. The 5- and 10-year survival rates for patients with alcohol recidivism were 92.9% and 45.1%, respectively, compared with 92.4% and 85.5%, respectively, for patients without alcohol recidivism. These figures show significantly lower survival rates in recidivistic patients after 10 years (P < 0.01, Mantel-Cox). The fact that patients who resumed alcohol consumption have a worse 10-year survival rate might be attributed to a higher frequency of deaths, primarily from cancer and cardiovascular events.

Liver transplantation for alcoholic liver disease

Patients with end-stage alcoholic liver disease should be considered for liver transplantation. A careful pretransplant evaluation must be undertaken to assess for both medical and psychiatric factors that will continue to require attention following transplantation. Although most programs require at least 6 months of ethanol abstinence before consideration of liver transplantation, there is little evidence that this conclusively predicts a reduction in recidivism. Most programs continue to exclude those with alcoholic hepatitis. Postoperatively, attention to psychiatric issues, recidivism, compliance, and assessment for tumors, especially squamous cell carcinomas, should be undertaken.

A review of genetic, biological, pharmacological, and clinical factors that affect carbohydrate-deficient transferrin levels

BACKGROUND

Carbohydrate-deficient transferrin (CDT) is an alcohol biomarker recently approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration. This test is increasingly being used to detect and monitor alcohol use in a variety of health care, legal, and industrial settings. The goal of this study is to review the genetic, biological, pharmacological, and clinical factors that may affect CDT levels.

METHODS

A review of the literature identified 95 research articles that met the authors' criteria and reported potential interactions of a variety of factors on percent and total CDT levels. The review established 12 categories of variables that may affect CDT levels. These categories include (1) alcohol use, (2) genetic factors, (3) race, (4) gender, (5) age, (6) liver disease, (7) iron levels, (8) tobacco use, (9) medication such as estrogen and anticonvulsants, (10) metabolic factors such as body mass index and total body water, (11) chronic medical conditions such as rheumatoid arthritis, and (12) surgical patients.

RESULTS

There is evidence that %CDT levels are affected by alcohol use, end-stage liver disease, and genetic variants. In addition to these three factors, total CDT levels (CDTect) are also affected by factors that raise transferrin levels such as iron deficiency, chronic illnesses, and menopausal status. Other potential factors such as tobacco and age appear to be confounded by alcohol use. The roles of female gender, low body mass index, chronic inflammatory diseases, and medication on CDT levels require further study. False negatives are associated with female gender, episodic lower level alcohol use, and acute trauma with blood loss.

CONCLUSIONS

This review suggests that a number of factors are associated with false-positive CDTect and %CDT levels. CDT offers great promise to assist physicians in the care of patients to detect and monitor heavy alcohol use.

Pretransplant screening of sobriety with carbohydrate-deficient transferrin in patients suffering from alcoholic cirrhosis

Sufficient assessment of potential candidates for orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) is the most important factor for a low alcohol relapse rate after transplantation in patients suffering from alcoholic cirrhosis. In the current study the efficiency of pretransplant screening with carbohydrate-deficient transferrin (CDT) was analysed in patients on the waiting list for OLT. A prospective study was performed in 44 patients who had undergone OLT for alcoholic cirrhosis. All patients had had pretransplant assessment by a specialist psychologist and were found to have no problems with alcohol. Pre- and post-transplant CDT monitoring was performed. Overall, 790 CDT values were measured in the study population. The median observation period was 2.1 months before and 41.2 months after transplantation, respectively. In 35 patients (80%) pretransplant CDT values were found to be above the reference value, but only one patient suffered an alcohol relapse after transplantation. Of the nine patients (20%) who demonstrated normal CDT before transplantation, two suffered an alcohol relapse after transplantation. CDT is a very useful marker for the monitoring of an alcohol relapse in patients following OLT for alcoholic cirrhosis, as has been previously indicated. However, CDT does not appear to be useful as a pretransplant screening marker for selection of potential transplant candidates suffering from alcoholic cirrhosis.

Carbohydrate-deficient transferrin (CDT)--a biomarker for long-term alcohol consumption

Carbohydrate-deficient transferrin (CDT) is a biomarker for chronic alcohol intake of more than 60 g ethanol/d. It has been reported to be superior to conventional markers like gamma-glutamyltransferase (GGT) and mean corpuscular volume MCV). This review covers theoretical and analytical aspects, with data from controlled drinking experiments and from different population subgroups such as subjects with different liver diseases or different drinking patterns. CDT determinations are particularly indicated in (1) cases of chronic alcohol consumption and relapses after withdrawal, (2) license reapplication after driving under alcohol influence, (3) differentiating patients with enzyme-inducing medication from those with alcohol abuse, 4) congenital disorders of glycosylation such as carbohydrate-deficient glycoprotein syndrome Ia (CDGS Ia), and (5) patients treated for galactosemia. The main advantage of CDT is its high specificity, as evidenced in combination with increased alcohol consumption. CDT values are not markedly influenced by medication except in immunosuppressed patients, who may show low CDT values. In general, CDT values appear less elevated after alcohol intake in women. The main disadvantage is the relatively low sensitivity. Hence, this parameter is not suitable for screening for subjects with alcohol abuse in the general population. As CDT, GGT, and MCV are connected with chronic alcohol consumption by different pathophysiological mechanisms, a combination of these parameters will further improve the diagnostic value.

Value of determining carbohydrate-deficient transferrin isoforms in the diagnosis of alcoholic liver disease

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether isoform separation of carbohydrate-deficient transferrin (CDT) is of value in the diagnosis of alcoholic liver disease (ALD) and is specific to ALD when compared with other liver diseases.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

During 1995 and 1996, 47 patients with ALD were evaluated with CDT at the Mayo Clinic in Rochester, Minn. The diagnosis of ALD was based on biochemical and histological analyses and on a history of drinking that exceeded 5 years with an average alcohol intake of more than 60 g/d. Disease controls included nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) (n = 26) and other liver disease (n = 22). Normal controls (n = 21) were healthy individuals without liver disease. Transferrin isoforms were quantified by densitometry of Coomassie-stained transferrins after affinity purification and isoelectric focusing. The pentasialo, tetrasialo, trisialo, disialo, monosialo, and asialo isoforms were quantified as percentages of total band densities.

RESULTS

Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were constructed for each isoform. The curves for total desialated isoforms (sum of disialo, monosialo, and asialo) displayed the best relationship between sensitivity and specificity with an ROC-area under the curve (AUC) of 0.922. The ROC-AUC values for individual transferrin isoforms in ALD vs NASH for pentasialo, tetrasialo, trisialo, disialo, monosialo, and asialo were 0.806, 0.917, 0.885, 0.933, 0.804, and 0.785, respectively. Only 58% of patients with ALD were detected at a specificity that excluded ALD in 84% of those who did not have it.

CONCLUSION

Within alcohol ingestion times reported to us, no associations with recent drinking were observed. Alcohol as a cause of liver disease is not perfectly established by CDT analysis, although a high total CDT value favors ALD over NASH.

Alcohol relapse after liver transplantation for alcoholic liver disease: does it matter?

BACKGROUND/AIMS

The aim of this study was to distinguish the types of alcohol consumption after liver transplantation (LT) for alcoholic cirrhosis and to assess the consequences of heavy drinking.

METHODS

Patients transplanted for alcoholic cirrhosis were studied. Alcoholic relapse diagnosis was based upon patient's and family members' reports, liver enzyme tests, graft biopsy, and use of urine alcohol test.

RESULTS

One hundred twenty-eight patients were studied, with a mean follow-up of 53.8 months. After LT, 69% of patients were abstinent, 10% were occasional drinkers, and 21% were heavy drinkers. Actuarial survival rates were not different, but three of the seven deaths observed among heavy drinkers were directly related to alcohol relapse. Although there was no difference between the three groups concerning the rejection rates, all rejection episodes observed in the group of heavy drinkers were related to poor compliance with immunosuppressive drugs. One heavy drinker developed alcoholic cirrhosis.

CONCLUSIONS

The present study indicates that patients can resume heavy alcohol consumption after LT for alcoholic liver disease (ALD) and their grafts can be injured because of poor compliance with immunosuppressive drugs and alcohol-related liver injury. Although patient survival was not influenced by alcohol relapse, heavy alcohol consumption can be responsible for patients' death.

Biomarkers as aids to identification of relapse in alcoholic patients

Since return to drinking is common in patients recovering from alcoholism, recognition of relapse should be an important component of treatment. Recurrent assessment with biochemical measures can provide clinicians with useful information on the drinking status of their patients. This chapter addresses issues surrounding the importance of early detection of relapse, describes biochemical markers that may assist in this, reviews relevant scientific investigations, and offers recommendations to researchers and clinicians.

Biochemical markers of alcohol use in pregnant women

OBJECTIVES

To describe the serious health consequences of alcohol (ethanol) use, especially as they relate to pregnancy and the development of fetal alcohol syndrome (FAS) and fetal alcohol effects (FAE). The classic markers of alcohol exposure, including blood/breath alcohol, gamma-glutamyl transferase (gammaGT), mean corpuscular volume (MCV), hemoglobin-associated acetaldehyde (HAA) and carbohydrate deficient transferrin (CDT), are valuable and their methods of analysis are reviewed.

CONCLUSIONS

Since both FAS and FAE represent two of the leading preventable causes of mental retardation and birth defects, identification of alcohol use early in pregnancy is important to avoid adverse fetal outcomes. Unfortunately, the diagnosis of FAS and FAE is usually made after birth, when alcohol damage has become irreversible and permanent. The clinical laboratory can help prevent this damage and make a valuable contribution in assessing prenatal alcohol use. The clinical utility of blood/breath alcohol, gammaGT, MCV, HAA and CDT in alcohol use identification, especially in pregnancy, is substantial. Although none of the markers singularly has adequate sensitivity and specificity for screening, their diagnostic utility increases when measured as a panel. This is especially true in detecting alcohol use in pregnancy where the presence of several positive markers was correlated with the presence of alcohol-related fetal effects.

Sensitivity and specificity of carbohydrate-deficient transferrin in drinking experiments and different patients

Information provided by patients about the amounts of alcohol they drink may often be too subjective and therefore unreliable. Because of the possible serious consequences of interactions between alcohol and medication, reliable laboratory test markers for alcohol consumption are needed. Carbohydrate-deficient transferrin (CDT) is at present the best available objective measure of drinking behavior. During a withdrawal trial, 92 alcohol-dependent patients who had been admitted to a hospital in an ethanol-intoxicated state were monitored over the following 28 days by using the percent carbohydrate-deficient transferrin (%CDT of total transferrin) (%CDT) method. At the time of admission, 63% showed elevated %CDT levels. After a subsequent period of abstinence, a decrease in %CDT levels was apparent in four different groups of patients, whereas in two groups, comprising the greatest number of patients, normal %CDT levels were evident after 14 days of abstinence. In patients whose CDT levels were very high at study initiation, it took at least 21 to 28 days--and sometimes longer--for CDT to decrease to the radioimmunoassay (RIA) %CDT test cutoff point of 2.5. In a further study of 56 male alcohol-dependent patients, we measured liver enzyme concentrations, mean corpuscular volume (MCV), and four CDT variants on the first day of evidence of withdrawal syndrome. We found a significant correlation between results on the Munich Alcoholism Test (MALT) and MCV levels; among gamma-glutamyltransferase (GGT), aspartate aminotransferase (AST), and alanine aminotransferase (ALT) levels; and among all four CDT variants. A cluster analysis yielded three clusters: (1) GGT, AST, and ALT levels; (2) MCV levels and MALT results; and (3) all CDT measurement variants. We conclude that these three clusters measure different detriments to the patient and that all available CDT variants are commensurate.

Liver transplantation for alcoholic liver disease

Although increasing numbers of alcoholic patients are being referred to liver transplant centres, liver transplantation for alcoholic liver disease still remains controversial, essentially because we are in an era of organ shortage. In fact, the main issue is the likelihood of relapse and its influence on outcome, because it is the possibility of returning to alcohol use that separates patients with alcoholic liver disease from those with other forms of chronic liver disease. In all proposed clinical guidelines of indications for referral and assessment for liver transplantation for alcoholic liver disease, the authors emphasize the risk of alcoholism recurrence and, thus, a multidisciplinary approach is required to select patients who are likely to comply with follow-up and not return to a damaging pattern of alcohol consumption after transplantation. It emerges from all clinical studies that when we take into account the usual criteria of success for liver transplantation, i.e. patient and graft survival, rejection rate and infection rate, alcoholic liver disease is a good indication for liver transplantation. Predictive factors for alcoholic relapse after liver transplantation have been assessed in numerous studies, often with contradictory results making these difficult to analyse and compare. Several predictive factors for alcoholic relapse have been studied: length of abstinence before transplantation, associated psychiatric problems, social conditions, associated drug addiction, age. Abstinence after transplantation is the goal, but the necessary treatment for alcoholic disease can result in considerable improvement, even when complete abstinence is not achieved. Finally, the good results obtained with liver transplantation for alcoholic liver disease should help us to educate the general population about alcoholic disease.

Quality of life after liver transplantation for alcoholic liver disease

There are few data on predictive factors for alcohol relapse or long-term functional outcome after liver transplantation for alcoholic liver disease (ALD). In all 56 surviving UK patients (47 men, 9 women; mean age: 51 years; range: 33 to 69 years) who underwent transplantation for ALD at King's College Hospital over a 10-year period, alcohol relapse and outcome were assessed by outpatient and case-note review and by postal questionnaire containing (1) the Nottingham Health Profile (NHP), (2) the Short-Form-36 (SF-36) Health Survey, and (3) a drug and alcohol questionnaire. At a median of 2.5 years (range: 0.5 to 10 years), 13 of the 47 respondents (28%) and 2 of the 9 nonrespondents (22%) had evidence of potentially harmful drinking (>3 units daily) at some time posttransplantation. An additional 13 patients admitted to drinking some alcohol at least once, corresponding to an overall relapse rate of 50%. The patients with harmful drinking (1) had started drinking regularly at a younger age (18 v 25 years; P =.01), (2) began drinking heavily at a younger age (30 v 40 years; P =.01), (3) had shorter pretransplantation abstinence periods (10 v 23 months; P =.02), and (4) had a longer time since transplantation (median, 5.7 v 1.5 years; P =.0004) than those with no or mild alcohol relapse. They were also more likely to report sleep disturbance (NHP sleep problem score, 45 v 16; P =.01) and use benzodiazepines regularly (7 of 13 v 3 of 34 patients; P =.002). Despite these differences, health dimension scores in the SF-36 and NHP posttransplantation were similar between the groups and to those of UK community controls. In the long term, at least 50% of the patients will drink again at some time posttransplantation, although at lower levels of alcohol intake than previously. Those patients with multiple predictive factors for alcohol relapse may be at greatest risk for harmful drinking and be the group that would benefit most from professional counseling. Overall, the quality of life after liver transplantation for ALD is high and broadly similar to the levels expected in the normal population.