Clinical evaluation of a new recombinant antigen-based cytomegalovirus immunoglobulin M immunoassay in liver transplant recipients

Molecular Detection and Glycoprotein B (UL55) Genotyping of Cytomegalovirus among Sudanese Renal Transplant Recipients

Background

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) is the most common opportunistic pathogen among renal transplants with significant morbidity and mortality. This study was designed to detect CMV DNA and to determine the frequency of different glycoprotein B (UL55) genotypes among Sudanese renal transplant recipients.

Methods

One hundred and four renal transplant recipients were included in this study. A blood specimen was collected from each recipient. DNA was extracted from plasma using the QIAamp DNA mini kit. CMV amplification and quantification were performed using CMV Real-RT Quant kits. Genotyping of human CMV gB was carried out by nested PCR and sequencing of the highly diverse region of gB.

Results

CMV DNA was detected in 40/104 (38.5%) of renal transplant recipients. The average of the CMV DNA viral load was 358 × 10⁴ copies/ml (6.5 log₁₀) ranging from 62 copies/ml (1.8 log₁₀) to 1.43 × 10⁸ copies/ml (9 log₁₀). CMV viremia was detected in 60% of recipients of less than 1–12 months, 17% of 13–24, 10% of 25–36, 5% of 37–48, and 8% in more than 48 months posttransplantation with no association (p = 0.296) between CMV viremia and postrenal transplantation time. The association between the type of immunosuppressive drugs and high viral loads (>1000 copies/ml) showed a significant difference (p = 0.05). The association between CMV loads of >1000 copies/ml and symptoms of CMV disease was highly significant (p ≤ 0.001). Fever 7 (41%), fever and leucopenia 6 (35%), and gastrointestinal disease 4 (24%) were the most common symptoms of CMV disease. CMV genotyping revealed 8 cases (80%) for gB3 and 2 cases (20%) for gB4 genotypes. The most frequent genotype among Sudanese renal transplant recipients was gB3.

Conclusions

The frequency of CMV DNA is high among Sudanese renal transplant recipients. CMV gB3 is the most predominant glycoprotein B genotype in Sudanese renal transplant recipients.

Cytomegalovirus infection after liver transplantation

Human cytomegalovirus (CMV) represents the most common opportunistic infection in liver transplant recipients. CMV infections in post liver transplant patients cause significant morbidity and mortality, directly affecting post-transplant outcomes. This review will provide the framework for the surveillance, diagnosis, prophylaxis and treatment of CMV in the liver transplant population.

A Practical Review of Cytomegalovirus in Gastroenterology and Hepatology

Human cytomegalovirus (CMV) is a ubiquitous Herpesviridae virus with a wide spectrum of pathology in humans. Host immunity is a major determinant of the clinical manifestation of CMV and can vary widely in the gastroenterology and hepatology practice setting. Immunocompetent patients generally develop a benign, self-limited mononucleosis-like syndrome whereas gastrointestinal tissue-invasive disease is more frequently seen in immunocompromised and inflammatory bowel disease patients. Additionally, liver allograft dysfunction is a significant consequence of CMV infection in liver transplant patients. While polymerase chain reaction and immunohistochemistry techniques allow for the reliable and accurate detection of CMV in the human host, the diagnostic value of different serologic, endoscopic, and histologic tests depends on a variety of factors. Similarly, latent CMV, CMV infection, and CMV disease carry different significance depending on the patient population, and the decision to initiate antiviral therapy can be complex and patient-specific. This review will focus on the pathophysiology, diagnosis, and management of CMV in patient populations relevant to the practice of gastroenterology and hepatology-liver transplant recipients, inflammatory bowel disease patients, and otherwise immunocompetent patients.

Rapid detection of cytomegalovirus infection in transplant patients

Human cytomegalovirus (CMV) is a well-known cause of morbidity and mortality in transplantation patients. Monitoring of CMV reactivation from latency is critical for these patients. The key to efficient and effective management of CMV infection is a test capable of rapidly monitoring and quantifying the presence of CMV in the blood. This is essential for the identification of subjects at high risk of developing CMV disease, for example, patients receiving steroid or immunosuppressive compounds for accelerated graft-versus-host disease, transplant rejection and also for the application and monitoring of pre-emptive antiviral therapeutic strategies. The assays presently available and frequently used in this setting include conventional and shell vial culture, the CMV antigenemia assay, PCR for CMV DNA, hybrid capture assay for CMV DNA and detection of CMV RNA by nucleic acid sequence-based amplification. The low sensitivity and low reproducibility of conventional cell culture and shell vial assays limit their role in the management of CMV infection to one of disease diagnosis. Diagnostic assays, such as the pp65 antigenemia and other molecular assays, have improved the ability to diagnose CMV disease quickly and accurately. These methods fulfill the requirements for a good diagnostic assay: they have high sensitivity, most can quantify viral load and they are rapid and reproducible. Their characteristics allow these assays to be used to predict the development of CMV disease and monitor response to therapy.

Clinical utility of cytomegalovirus (CMV) serology testing in high-risk CMV D+/R- transplant recipients

Late-onset cytomegalovirus (CMV) disease is a significant problem in D+/R- solid organ transplant (SOT) patients who receive antiviral prophylaxis. We assessed the clinical utility of CMV IgG and IgM serology testing for predicting late-onset CMV disease. We evaluated 352 D+/R- transplant recipients who participated in a trial comparing 100 days of ganciclovir versus valganciclovir prophylaxis. CMV serology was assessed on day 28, 56, 100, and 6 and 12 months post-transplant. IgG seroconversion occurred in 26.9% of patients by day 100, and in 63.4% and 75.3% by 6 and 12 months, respectively. IgM seroconversion occurred in 8.3%, 41.8% and 54.9% by day 100, month 6 and month 12, respectively. Seroconversion by day 100 (end of prophylaxis) was not predictive of subsequent CMV disease (CMV disease 13.3% if seropositive vs. 17.8% if seronegative; p = NS). However, at 6 months post-transplant, IgG serostatus was predictive of subsequent CMV disease between month 6 and 12 (CMV disease 1.3% if seropositive vs. 10.0% if seronegative; p = 0.002). In D+/R- patients, CMV serology testing is for the most part not clinically useful for predicting subsequent disease. However, seroconversion by 6 months may be useful for identifying patients at risk of late-onset CMV disease.