Neuropeptide Y as a far-reaching neuromediator: from energy balance and cardiovascular regulation to central integration of weight and bone mass control mechanisms. Implications for human diseases

The autonomic nervous system and bone health in chronic kidney disease

Besides the well-known role of hormonal factors in mineral and bone metabolism, the sympathetic nervous system participates in this regulation by inhibiting bone formation and promoting bone resorption, primarily via β-adrenergic receptors expressed on osteoblasts. Conversely, the parasympathetic system, through cholinergic signalling, inhibits osteoclast activity, promoting bone formation and maintaining skeletal homeostasis. This review presents the role of the autonomic nervous system, with particular focus on the potential role of β-blockers, especially β1-selective blockers, in modulating bone health in people with normal kidney function and those with CKD. While early studies with non-selective β-blockers like propranolol showed mixed results, recent findings in postmenopausal women suggested that β1-selective β-blockers could enhance bone density by modulating sympathetic activity. Trial emulation using large databases and eventually randomized controlled trials are needed to test the hypothesis that β-blockade can favourably impact bone disease in patients with kidney failure.

Neuropeptide Y gene polymorphisms and chronic kidney disease progression

BACKGROUND

Neuropeptide Y (NPY) is a neurotransmitter expressed in both the central and peripheral nervous systems, which is involved in regulating a multitude of physiological processes ranging from arterial pressure, energy balance, the immune response and inflammation and renal electrolyte transport. In a cohort of chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients, we recently showed that high plasma NPY levels predict renal disease progression independently of hypertension and other risk factors but the causal nature of this association remains unproven.

METHODS

In the same cohort of the previous study, we tested the relationship of NPY gene variability, as assessed by five single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) that explained the whole gene variability, with the incidence rate of a predefined combined renal endpoint (dialysis/transplantation/estimated glomerular filtration rate reduction >30%) over a median follow up of 36 months (inter-quartile range 35-37 months) in 735 ethnically homogeneous patients with stage 2-5 CKD.

RESULTS

Two variants [rs16131 (recessive model for the T risk allele: TT, n  = 563; CT + CC, n  = 172) and rs16140 (dominant model for the G risk allele: GG + CG, n  = 413; CC, n  = 322)] were coherently associated with the incidence rate of renal events [hazard ratio (HR) ranging from 1.39 to 1.57, P  ≤ 0.015] and this was also true when the two SNPs were jointly introduced into the same Cox model ( P  ≤ 0.043). The analysis of the biological interaction showed a significant synergism between the NPY rs16131 and rs16140 variants. Indeed, patients harboring NPY rs16131 TT and NPY rs16140 GG + CG risk genotypes had a much higher HR of renal events [HR: 1.80, 95% confidence interval (CI):1.16-2.79, P  = 0.009] than that expected in the absence of biological interaction under both the additive and multiplicative models and the attributable proportion due to interaction (AP) was 25% and 38% on crude and adjusted analyses, respectively.

CONCLUSION

This study, based on the Mendelian randomization approach and using NPY gene variants as instrumental variables to test the link between NPY and CKD progression, is in line with findings indicating that high plasma NPY levels predict an increased risk for renal events and lend support to the hypothesis that NPY is causally involved in renal disease progression.

Neuropeptide Y as a risk factor for cardiorenal disease and cognitive dysfunction in CKD: translational opportunities and challenges

Neuropeptide Y (NPY) is a 36-amino-acid peptide member of a family also including peptide YY and pancreatic polypeptide, which are all ligands to Gi/Go coupled receptors. NPY regulates several fundamental biologic functions including appetite/satiety, sex and reproduction, learning and memory, cardiovascular and renal function and immune functions. The mesenteric circulation is a major source of NPY in the blood in man and this peptide is considered a key regulator of gut–brain cross talk. A progressive increase in circulating NPY accompanies the progression of chronic kidney disease (CKD) toward kidney failure and NPY robustly predicts cardiovascular events in this population. Furthermore, NPY is suspected as a possible player in accelerated cognitive function decline and dementia in patients with CKD and in dialysis patients. In theory, interfering with the NPY system has relevant potential for the treatment of diverse diseases from cardiovascular and renal diseases to diseases of the central nervous system. Pharmaceutical formulations for effective drug delivery and cost, as well as the complexity of diseases potentially addressable by NPY/NPY antagonists, have been a problem until now. This in part explains the slow progress of knowledge about the NPY system in the clinical arena. There is now renewed research interest in the NPY system in psychopharmacology and in pharmacology in general and new studies and a new breed of clinical trials may eventually bring the expected benefits in human health with drugs interfering with this system.

Neuropeptide Y mediates cardiac hypertrophy through microRNA-216b/FoxO4 signaling pathway

Cardiac hypertrophy (CH) is a major risk factor for heart failure accompanied by maladaptive cardiac remodeling. The role and potential mechanism of neuropeptide Y (NPY) in CH are still unclear. We will explore the role and the mechanism of NPY inactivation (NPY-I) in CH caused by pressure overload. Abdominal aortic constriction (AAC) was used to induce CH model in rats. NPY or angiotensin II (Ang II) was used to trigger CH model in vitro in neonatal rat ventricular myocytes (NRVMs). We found that NPY was increased in the heart and plasma of hypertrophic rats. However, Ang II did not increase NPY expression in cardiomyocytes. NPY-I attenuated CH as decreasing CH-related markers (ANP, BNP and β-MHC mRNA) level, reducing cell surface area, and restoring cardiac function. NPY inactivation increased miR-216b and decreased FoxO4 expression in CH heart. Moreover, NPY decreased miR-216b and increased FoxO4 expression in NRVMs which were reversed by NPY type 1 receptor (NPY1R) antagonist BIBO3304. MiR-216b mimic and FoxO4 siRNA (small interfering RNA) inhibited NPY/Ang II-induced myocardial hypertrophy in vitro. Meanwhile, BIBO3304 reversed the pro-hypertrophy effect of NPY in vitro. Collectively, NPY deficiency attenuated CH by NPY1R-miR-216b-FoxO4 axis. These findings suggested that NPY would be a potential therapeutic target for the prevention and treatment of cardiac hypertrophy.

Neuropeptide Y predicts cardiovascular events in chronic kidney disease patients: a cohort study

BACKGROUND

Neuropeptide Y (NPY) is a multifaceted sympathetic neurotransmitter regulating reflex cardiovascular control, myocardial cell growth, inflammation and innate immunity. Circulating NPY levels predict cardiovascular mortality in patients with end stage kidney disease on dialysis but this relationship has never been tested in predialysis chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients.

METHODS

We investigated the relationship between circulating NPY and the risk for cardiovascular events (Fine & Gray competing risks model) in a cohort of 753 stages 2-5 CKD patients over a median follow-up of 36 months.

RESULTS

Independently of other risk factors, plasma NPY was directly related with the glomerular filtration rate (β = -0.19, P < 0.001) but was independent of systemic inflammation as quantified by serum IL6 and C reactive protein. Over follow-up 112 patients had cardiovascular events and 12 died. In analyses fully adjusted for traditional risk factors and a large series of CKD-specific risk factors and considering death as a competing event (Fine and Gray model) a 0.25 μmol/l increase in NPY robustly predicted the incident risk for cardiovascular events (subdistribution hazard ratio: 1.25; 95% confidence interval: 1.09-1.44; P = 0.002). Furthermore, the fully adjusted NPY - cardiovascular outcomes relationship was modified by age (P = 0.012) being quite strong in young patients but weaker in the old ones.

CONCLUSION

NPY is an independent, robust predictor of cardiovascular events in predialysis CKD patients and the risk for such events is age-dependent being maximal in young patients. These findings suggest that NPY may play a role in the high risk of cardiovascular disease in this population.

Neuropeptide Y and chronic kidney disease progression: a cohort study

Background

Neuropeptide Y (NPY) is a sympathetic neurotransmitter that has been implicated in various disorders including obesity, gastrointestinal and cardiovascular diseases.

Methods

We investigated the relationship between circulating NPY and the progression of the glomerular filtration rate (GFR) and proteinuria and the risk for a combined renal endpoint (>30% GFR loss, dialysis/transplantation) in two European chronic kidney disease (CKD) cohorts including follow-up of 753 and 576 patients for 36 and 57 months, respectively.

Results

Average plasma NPY was 104 ± 32 pmol/L in the first CKD cohort and 119 ± 41 pmol/L in the second one. In separate analyses of the two cohorts, NPY associated with the progression of the estimated GFR (eGFR) and proteinuria over time in both unadjusted and adjusted {eGFR: -3.60 mL/min/1.73 m2 [95% confidence interval (CI): -4.46 to - 2.74] P < 0.001 and -0.83 mL/min/1.73 m2 (-1.41 to - 0.25, P = 0.005); proteinuria: 0.18 g/24 h (0.11-0.25) P < 0.001 and 0.07 g/24 h (0.005-0.14) P = 0.033} analyses by the mixed linear model. Accordingly, in a combined analysis of the two cohorts accounting for the competitive risk of death (Fine and Gray model), NPY predicted (P = 0.005) the renal endpoint [sub-distribution hazard ratio (SHR): 1.09; 95% CI: 1.03-1.16; P = 0.005] and the SHR in the first cohort (1.14, 95% CI: 1.04-1.25) did not differ (P = 0.25) from that in the second cohort (1.06, 95% CI: 0.98-1.15).

Conclusions

NPY associates with proteinuria and faster CKD progression as well as with a higher risk of kidney failure. These findings suggest that the sympathetic system and/or properties intrinsic to the NPY molecule may play a role in CKD progression.

Vasoactive Peptide Levels after Change of Dialysis Mode

Background/Aims

Plasma concentrations of the N-terminal fragment of pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) are increased in end-stage renal disease. Improvement in hemodynamic stability has been reported when switching from hemodialysis (HD) to on-line hemodiafiltration (ol-HDF). The aim of this study was to investigate plasma concentrations of NT-proBNP, BNP and neuropeptide Y (NPY) during a 1-year follow-up, after a change from high-flux HD to postdilution ol-HDF. Additional variables were also studied, e.g. pulse wave velocity and ordinary clinical parameters.

Method

We conducted a prospective, single-center study including 35 patients who were switched from HD to HDF. Plasma concentrations of NT-proBNP, BNP and NPY before and after dialysis were measured at baseline (i.e. HD) and at 1, 2, 4, 6 and 12 months on HDF.

Results

All three peptide levels decreased significantly during HD and HDF when comparing concentrations before and after dialysis. Mean absolute value (before/after) and relative decrease (%) before versus after dialysis was 13.697/9.497 ng/l (31%) for NT-proBNP, 62/40 ng/ml (35%) for BNP and 664/364 pg/l (45%) for NPY. No significant differences were observed when comparing predialysis values over time. However, postdialysis NT-proBNP concentration showed a significant decrease of 48% over time after the switch to HDF.

Conclusion

The postdialysis plasma levels of NT-proBNP, BNP and NPY decreased significantly during both dialysis modes when compared to before dialysis. The postdialysis lowering of NT-proBNP increased further over time after the switch to ol-HDF; the predialysis levels were unchanged, suggesting no effect on its production in the ventricles of the heart.

Neuropeptide Y receptor Y2 gene polymorphism interacts with plasma neuropeptide Y levels in predicting left ventricular hypertrophy in dialysis patients

BACKGROUND

Neuropeptide Y (NPY) is a sympathetic neurotransmitter that acts on multiple receptors involved in cardiovascular remodelling and angiogenesis. Plasma levels of NPY are increased in patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) and are independently related to left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) and incident cardiovascular events in these patients.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the relationship between NPY receptor Y2 gene polymorphism and left ventricular mass index (LVMI) as well as the interaction between this polymorphism and plasma NPY in determining LVH in 189 ESRD patients.

RESULTS

LVMI was significantly higher (+12%, P = 0.03) in patients carrying the C allele than in those without C allele and was linearly associated with plasma NPY (P = 0.01). Interaction analysis showed a significant NPY-LVMI relationship in patients with the C allele, both at univariate (r = 0.27, P = 0.001) and multivariate (r = 0.21, P = 0.01) analyses, whereas no such relationship existed in patients without this allele. In fully adjusted analyses, a 10 pmol/l increase in plasma NPY entailed a 4.9 g/m increase in LVMI in patients with C allele, whereas the same change in NPY levels did not modify the NPY-LVMI link in patients without such allele (P = 0.009).

CONCLUSION

NPY receptor Y2 polymorphism is independently associated with LVMI and interacts with plasma levels of NPY in explaining the variability of LVH in ESRD. These results offer a genetic basis to the hypothesis that NPY is causally implicated in the pathogenetic pathway leading to LVH in ESRD patients.

Integration of feeding and spontaneous physical activity: role for orexin

Spontaneous physical activity is activity that is non-volitional, or subconscious, such as fidgeting and shifting in one's seat, and time spent moving (standing and ambulating). Recent evidence indicates that spontaneous physical activity, and the resulting thermogenesis (non-exercise activity thermogenesis) may be regulated by brain systems. A large number of brain areas, with their associated neurotransmitter populations and connectivity, participate in the regulation of feeding behavior by acting as energy sensing and modulating centers. Although less well characterized, it is likely that a multitude of neurotransmitters and brain areas act to mediate spontaneous physical activity. These two behaviors, feeding and spontaneous physical activity, affect energy intake and expenditure and thus are important to body weight. Interestingly, often the two behaviors are affected simultaneously; when feeding is affected, so too is spontaneous physical activity, and both food intake and physical activity (whether spontaneous or volitional) influence activity of brain areas important to both. Several brain areas and neuropeptides are important to feeding and spontaneous physical activity. The lateral hypothalamus is one area that appears important to both behaviors, as stimulation or lesion of this region produces alterations in feeding behavior and spontaneous physical activity. Orexin neurons, with their central location in the lateral hypothalamus, widespread projections and connectivity to other brain areas important to energy homeostasis, are well situated to perform an integrative function. This review focuses on how hypothalamic orexins participate in both feeding and spontaneous physical activity, and provides potential models for the integration of signals important to both.

The inflammatory consequences of psychologic stress: relationship to insulin resistance, obesity, atherosclerosis and diabetes mellitus, type II

Inflammation is frequently present in the visceral fat and vasculature in certain patients with cardiovascular disease (CVD) and/or adult onset Diabetes Mellitus Type II (NIDDM). An hypothesis is presented which argues that repeated acute or chronic psychologically stressful states may cause this inflammatory process. The mediators are the major stress hormones norepinephrine (NE) and epinephrine (E) and cortisol together with components of the renin-angiotensin system (RAS), the proinflammatory cytokines (PIC), as well as free fatty acids (ffa), the latter as a result of lipolysis of neutral fat. NE/E commence this process by activation of NF(kappa)B in macrophages, visceral fat, and endothelial cells which induces the production of toll-like receptors which, when engaged, produce a cascade of inflammatory reactions comprising the acute phase response (APR) of the innate immune system (IIS). The inflammatory process is most marked in the visceral fat depot as well as the vasculature, and is involved in the metabolic events which culminate in the insulin resistance/metabolic syndromes (IRS/MS), the components of which precede and comprise the major risk factors for CVD and NIDDM. The visceral fat has both the proclivity and capacity to undergo inflammation. It contains a rich blood and nerve supply as well as proinflammatory molecules such as interleukin 6 (IL-6), tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNFalpha), leptin, and resistin, the adipocytokines, and acute phase proteins (APP) which are activated from adipocytes and/or macrophages by sympathetic signaling. The inflammation is linked to fat accumulation. Cortisol, IL-6, angiotensin II (angio II), the enzyme 11(beta) hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase-1 and positive energy balance, the latter due to increased appetite induced by the major stress hormones, are factors which promote fat accumulation and are linked to obesity. There is also the capacity of the host to limit fat expansion. Sympathetic signaling induces TNF which stimulates the production of IL-6 and leptin from adipocytes; these molecules promote lipolysis and ffa fluxes from adipocytes. Moreover, catecholamines and certain PIC inhibit lipoprotein lipase, a fat synthesizing enzyme. The brain also participates in the regulation of fat cell mass; it is informed of fat depot mass by molecules such as leptin and ffa. Leptin stimulates corticotrophin releasing hormone in the brain which stimulates the SNS and HPA axes, i.e. the stress response. Also, ffa through portal signaling from the liver evoke a similar stress response which, like the response to psychologic stress, evokes an innate immune response (IIR), tending to limit fat expansion, which culminates in inflammatory cascades, the IRS-MS, obesity and disease if prolonged. Thus, the brain also has the capacity to limit fat expansion. A competition apparently exists between fat expansion and fat loss. In "western" cultures, with excessive food ingestion, obesity frequently results. The linkage of inflammation to fat metabolism is apparent since weight loss diminishes the concentration of inflammatory mediators. The linkage of stress to inflammation is all the more apparent since the efferent pathways from the brain in response to fat signals, which results in inflammation to decrease and limit fat cell mass, is the same as the response to psychologic stress, which strengthens the hypothesis presented herein.