Quantitative assessment of serum beta-2-microglobulin in liver transplant recipients and relationship to liver graft rejection

Preliminary clinical experience applying donor-derived cell-free DNA to discern rejection in pediatric liver transplant recipients

Donor-derived cell-free DNA (dd-cfDNA) has been of major interest recently as a non-invasive marker of graft injury, but has not yet been extensively tested in children. From May to September in 2019, a total of 76 pediatric patients receiving a liver graft were enrolled and there were 27 patients excluded. Ultimately plasma samples and matched liver specimens from 49 patients were successfully collected whenever rejection was suspected clinically. Dd-cfDNA were analyzed and then compared to biopsy. Of these, 11 (22.4%) patients were found to have rejection by biopsy. Dd-cfDNA levels were higher among patients with rejection compared to those with no rejection. In subgroup analysis, dd-cfDNA% among patients with rejection differed from those with EBV/CMV infection and DILI patients. Similarly, observations were available concerning dd-cfDNA (cp/mL). The AUC for dd-cfDNA% and dd-cfDNA (cp/mL) were 0.878, 0.841, respectively, both of which were higher than conventional LFTs. For rejection, dd-cfDNA% ≥ 28.7% yielded a sensitivity of 72.7%, specificity 94.7% and dd-cfDNA (cp/mL) ≥ 2076 cp/mL, yielded a sensitivity of 81.8%, specificity 81.9%. Of note, the dd-cfDNA distribution was significantly different between whole liver and LLS transplantation. In the setting of pediatric LTx, dd-cfDNA appears to be a sensitive biomarker indicating the presence of rejection.International Clinical Trails Registry Platform: ChiCTR1900022406.

Monitoring of transplanted liver health by quantification of organ-specific genomic marker in circulating DNA from receptor

Background

Health assessment of the transplanted organ is very important due to the relationship of long-term survival of organ transplant recipients and health organ maintenance. Nowadays, the measurement of cell-free DNA from grafts in the circulation of transplant recipients has been considered a potential biomarker of organ rejection or transplant associated complications in an attempt to replace or reduce liver biopsy. However, methods developed to date are expensive and extremely time-consuming. Our approach was to measure the SRY gene, as a male organ biomarker, in a setting of sex-mismatched female recipients of male donor organs.

Methods

Cell-free DNA quantization of the SRY gene was performed by real-time quantitative PCR beforehand, at the moment of transplantation during reperfusion (day 0) and during the stay at the intensive care unit. Beta-globin cell-free DNA levels, a general cellular damage marker, were also quantified.

Results

Beta-globin mean values of patients, who accepted the graft without any complications during the first week after surgery, diminished from day 0 until patient stabilization. This decrease was not so evident in patients who suffered some kind of post-transplantation complications. All patients showed an increase in SRY levels at day 0, which decreased during hospitalization. Different complications that did not compromise donated organs showed increased beta-globin levels but no SRY gene levels. However, when a donated organ was damaged the patients exhibited high levels of both genes.

Conclusion

Determination of a SRY gene in a female recipient's serum is a clear and specific biomarker of donated organs and may give us important information about graft health in a short period of time by a non-expensive technique. This approach may permit clinicians to maintain a close follow up of the transplanted patient.

Biomarkers for the diagnosis of acute cellular rejection in liver transplant recipients: A review

The gold standard for the diagnosis of acute cellular rejection (ACR) is a liver biopsy. The quest for an alternative non-invasive biomarkers has been long and is ongoing. However, an efficient and useful biomarker has not been developed yet. In this manuscript, we review all possible candidate biomarkers that have been studied in recent years, starting with cytokines and ending with an overview of different newly discovered "omics". Promising paths are being explored but a valid non-invasive biomarker has not been discovered yet.