Long-term restoration of deficits in bone mineral density is inadequate in premenopausal women with prior menstrual irregularity

Five-year follow-up investigation of bone mineral density by age in premenopausal elite-level long-distance runners

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate bone mineral density (BMD) by age in premenopausal elite long-distance runners at 2 time points, 5.02 ± 0.5 years apart.

DESIGN

Follow-up study.

SETTING

University Research Institute.

PARTICIPANTS

Twenty-three elite-level distance runners (baseline age, 24.9 ± 3.9 years; body mass index, 18.7 ± 1.1; running distance, 89.3 ± 19.4 km/wk) participated in the study.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (iDXA; GE Healthcare)-derived BMD z-scores for the total body (TB), lumbar spine (LS) (L2-L4), and proximal femur. A z-score of <-1.0 indicated low BMD by age.

RESULTS

Lumbar spine BMD z-scores had increased significantly by follow-up for all runners (baseline, -1.1 ± 0.9; follow-up, -0.7 ± 0.7; P = 0.04) and for formerly amenorrheic runners with restored menstruation (n = 10; baseline, -1.5 ± 0.9; follow-up, -0.9 ± 0.6; P = 0.03). Total body, but not proximal femur z-scores, had also increased (P < 0.05). Improvements in z-scores correlated with an increased body fat (LS: R2 = 0.27; TB: R2 = 0.35; P < 0.01) and menstrual history score (LS: R2 = 0.36; TB: R2 = 0.27; P < 0.05). There were no associations with lean mass or running volume at any skeletal site (P = 0.07-0.89).

CONCLUSIONS

Low BMD by age in highly-trained female runners may be at least partially reversible before the age of 30 years, even when competitive running is continued. This seems to be related to restored menstruation and an increased body fat. Further larger studies are required to clarify our findings.

Physical activity increases bone mass during growth

BACKGROUND

The incidence of fragility fractures has increased during the last half of the 1990's. One important determinant of fractures is the bone mineral content (BMC) or bone mineral density (BMD), the amount of mineralised bone. If we could increase peak bone mass (the highest value of BMC reached during life) and/or decrease the age-related bone loss, we could possibly improve the skeletal resistance to fracture.

OBJECTIVE

This review evaluates the importance of exercise as a strategy to improve peak bone mass, including some aspects of nutrition.

DESIGN

PUBLICATIONS WITHIN THE FIELD WERE SEARCHED THROUGH MEDLINE (PUBMED) USING THE SEARCH WORDS: exercise, physical activity, bone mass, bone mineral content, bone mineral density, BMC, BMD, skeletal structure and nutrition. We included studies dealing with exercise during growth and young adolescence. We preferably based our inferences on randomised controlled trials (RCT), which provide the highest level of evidence.

RESULTS

Exercise during growth increases peak bone mass. Moderate intensity exercise intervention programs are beneficial for the skeletal development during growth. Adequate nutrition must accompany the exercise to achieve the most beneficial skeletal effects by exercise.

CONCLUSION

Exercise during growth seems to enhance the building of a stronger skeleton through a higher peak bone mass and a larger bone size.

Factors associated with menstrual dysfunction and self-reported bone stress injuries in female runners in the ultra- and half-marathons of the Two Oceans

OBJECTIVE

To investigate factors associated with menstrual dysfunction, self-reported bone stress injuries and energy balance in women runners.

METHODS

613 runners were randomly sampled during the registration period for an endurance event. Demographic information, including self-reported height and weight, training and injury history and menstrual history, was collected by questionnaire.

RESULTS

Ultra-marathon (ULTRA) participants (n = 276) were significantly older (mean (SD) 39 (8.2) vs 34 (10.5) years; p<0.001), lighter (58.2 (6.6) vs 59.6 (8.3) kg; p<0.05) and reported a higher training volume (p<0.001) than half-marathon (HALF) participants (n = 337). Significantly more ULTRA subjects than HALF subjects reported a previous bone stress injury (21% vs 14%; p<0.05). There was no difference between the groups for menstrual status, but age at menarche was later (p<0.01) in the ULTRA group. Data were combined according to the absence (REG; n = 368/602 (61%)) or presence (IRREG; n = 234/602 (39%)) of a history of menstrual irregularity. Subject morphology was similar between groups, but the IRREG group had a higher self-reported measure on the self-loathing subscale (SLSS; p<0.01). The whole group was then classified according to current menstrual status, with 165 women being classified as currently irregular. (OLIGO/AMEN; 11.6%) and 445 women as currently regular (EUMEN; 88.4%). There were no morphological differences between the groups, however the OLIGO/AMEN group had a later age of menarche (p<0.01) than the EUMEN group. Further, women who reported a previous bone stress injury had higher SLSS scores than those who did not (2.91 (0.98) vs 2.68 (0.84); p<0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

There may be two independent mechanisms associated with energy balance, which are related to bone stress injuries, but may not necessarily be related to menstrual dysfunction.

Loading and bone fragility

Data from retrospective and prospective observational and case-control studies suggest that activity is associated with reduced fracture risk, but consistently replicated bias may be responsible for this desired endpoint. Exercise during growth is likely to build a larger and stronger skeleton. However, cessation of exercise may erode the benefits. Modeling changes produced by exercise during growth may be permanent; remodeling changes may not be. Exercise during adulthood produces small increments in BMD or may prevent bone loss. Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence of effect, but the null hypothesis that exercise has no effect on fracture rates in old age cannot be rejected by any published data. Proof requires demonstration of a reduction in spine and hip fractures in well-designed and well-executed prospective randomized studies; none exists. Blinded studies cannot be done, but open trials can and should be done.

Has exercise an antifracture efficacy in women?

Exercise in girls during growth seems to confer a high peak bone mineral density (BMD). Exercise in adulthood, in the peri- and postmenopausal period, and in old age prevents bone loss or increases BMD with a magnitude of minor biological significance. However, these changes must be regarded as beneficial compared to the age-related bone loss, which inevitably will occur if no interventions are implemented. Prospective intervention studies also suggest that exercise improves muscle strength, coordination and balance, even in elderly women, all of which are improvements with a potential of reducing the number of falls. A randomised, controlled, prospective, blinded study (the only study design that tests a hypothesis) of exercise with fracture as end point is extremely difficult to conduct, due to the large sample sizes needed. At present, no such studies exist. Retrospective and prospective observational and case-control studies suggest that physical activity in women is associated with reduced fracture risk. This may be correct, but we must never forget that a consistently replicated sampling bias may produce the same outcome. The Achilles heel of exercise is the reduction or the cessation of physical activity, which commonly occurs among middle-aged women when family and work demands reduce the time available for exercise. A higher BMD or improvement in muscle size and muscle strength achieved by exercise during adolescence seems to be eroded on retirement, leaving virtually no remaining benefits in old age, the period when fragility fractures begin to be a problem of increasing magnitude. However, recreational activities seem to maintain some of the musculo-skeletal benefits, but to date we do not know the level of activity needed to retain these benefits. Dose-response relationships need to be quantified, as also the effects on bone size, shape and architecture. Another essential question that we must address is how many fewer fractures will be the result of a community-based exercise campaign. Will efforts by the community to encourage a higher level of physical exercise, with the aim of reducing bone fractures, be cost-effective? The higher level of proof, suggesting that exercise does reduce fragility fractures and thus reduces the total cost for the society, must come from well-designed and well-executed, prospective, randomised, controlled trials. The responsibility of executing these studies lies in the hands of both researchers and the community.

The evidence that exercise during growth or adulthood reduces the risk of fragility fractures is weak

There has never been, and will never be, a randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trial demonstrating that exercise in youth, adulthood or old age reduces fragility or osteoporosis-related fractures in old age. The next level of evidence, a randomized, controlled but unblinded study with fractures as an end-point is feasible but has never been done. The basis for the belief that exercise reduces fractures is derived from lower levels of 'evidence', namely, retrospective and prospective observation cohort studies and case-control studies. These studies are at best hypothesis generating, never hypothesis testing. They are all subject to many systematic biases and should be interpreted with extreme scepticism. Surrogate measures of anti-fracture efficacy are the next level of evidence, such as the demonstration of a reduction in risk factors for falls, a reduction in falls, a reduction in fractures due to falls, an increase in peak bone size and mass, prevention of bone loss in midlife and restoration of bone mass and structure in old age.

The role of physiotherapy in the prevention and treatment of osteoporosis

Osteoporosis is an increasing public health problem that causes loss of life and reduced quality of life in sufferers. Strategies to improve bone density and reduce the likelihood of falls are important in the prevention of osteoporosis. Physiotherapists have a role to play in this condition through exercise prescription, therapeutic modalities, specific techniques and education. Appropriate treatment goals can be established following a thorough assessment of signs and symptoms, risk factors for osteoporosis and functional status. Levels of bone density measured from dual energy X-ray absorptiometry can help guide patient management. Since the aim is to maximize peak bone mass in children and adolescents, participation in a variety of high-impact activities should be encouraged. In the middle adult years, small increases in bone mass may be achieved by structured weight-training and weight-bearing exercise. In the older adult years, particularly if osteopenia or osteoporosis is present, the aim is to conserve bone mass, reduce the risk of falls, promote extended posture, reduce pain, and improve mobility and function.

Disordered eating and the female athlete triad

Female athletes are under intense pressure to have a low percentage of body fat for performance, which may result in a vulnerable athlete resorting to disordered eating, developing amenorrhea, and suffering the consequences of osteoporosis. Prevention of disordered eating practices among female athletes requires a de-emphasis of a low percentage of body fat and a good nutrition education program. The female athlete triad is a serious syndrome that requires a multidisciplinary approach to diagnosis and treatment.