Rigid Bronchoscopy: Complications in a University Hospital

Our Experience of Managing Central Airway Tumors: Anesthesia Perspectives

ABSTRACT

Adult patients with central airway tumors commonly present with dyspnea on exertion. These patients may remain asymptomatic until more than half of the airway diameter is obliterated. Anesthesia for debulking a central airway tumor is challenging. Anesthetic management should include a strategy for oxygenation and ventilation, a plan for the same if tumor bleeding aggravates airway obstruction and a plan to deal with acute emergencies like pneumothorax and cardiac arrest. Patients with airway tumors occupying < 50% airway diameter and comfortable during routine activities can be managed using relaxant anesthesia and rigid bronchoscopy for debulking. Airway tumors with >75% airway lumen compromise are the sickest and may present in respiratory failure. We found that in these patients, maintaining spontaneous ventilation, avoidance of general anesthesia, and muscle relaxation are the keys to management. General anesthesia and muscle relaxants decreases / abolishes negative intrapleural pressure, which may result in dynamic hyperinflation and pneumothorax in presence of airway obstruction. In this subset, we routinely use i-gel (sizes 4 and 5) as an airway conduit for debulking. We prefer i-gel® (Intersurgical Ltd, UK) over rigid bronchoscopy as it requires less sedation. To allow this, it is prudent to ensure excellent airway anesthesia prior to i-gel placement using airway blocks, topical anesthetics, and titrated doses of sedation. We manage 20-30 cases of central airway tumors for debulking or stenting every year and share our experience of managing four cases depicting a spectrum of airway and review the literature on anesthetic management of central airway tumors.

Iatrogenic tracheal laceration due to rigid bronchoscopy treated by endoscopic stent placement: a case report

Although rigid bronchoscopy may lead to tracheal injury, the incidence is unknown. A 59-year-old woman diagnosed with clinical stage IV esophageal cancer was scheduled to undergo placement of a silicon Y-stent by rigid bronchoscopy to address tracheal stenosis. When the tumor was cored out by rigid bronchoscopy, perforation of the lower trachea occurred, and a silicon Y-stent was inserted to cover the tracheal fistula. Chest X-ray revealed right pneumothorax, and chest drainage was performed. When spontaneous ventilation was confirmed, the patient was weaned from the ventilator in the operating room. Chest computed tomography immediately after surgery showed an air space on the right side of the stent. The space gradually disappeared over time, and no air leakage was observed. The chest drain was removed on postoperative Day 12. Conservative treatment using a silicon Y-stent for iatrogenic tracheal injury due to rigid bronchoscopy is safe.

[Bronchoscopic treatment of malignant central airway obstruction: A cohort study, long-term survival and complications]

INTRODUCTION

Interventional bronchoscopy is now the standard treatment for tracheobronchial narrowing due to tumor. The objective of our study was to analyze long-term survival and complications occurring in patients with malignant airway obstruction.

METHODS

We retrospectively studied the data from 93 patients treated between 2008 and 2019.

RESULTS

One hundred and eleven therapeutic bronchoscopies were performed. Sixty-seven patients had primary lung cancer, in 17 had tumors of another origin and 9 patients had benign or local lung tumors. Thulium laser was frequently used prior to tumor enucleation and to restore hemostasis. Seventy-one silicone stents were inserted. The death rate at the time of the procedure was 1.8% and immediate complication occurred in 9.9% of the patients. Long-term survival was significantly better for patients with cancer from other origins than in those with primary lung cancer (615.5days versus 177.9days). On the other hand, there was no significant difference in long-term survival between patients with locally advanced and metastatic lung cancer with endobronchial lesions treated by stent and those who were not (234.2days versus 164.6days). All patients with benign or with locally malignant tumors were still alive.

CONCLUSION

Therapeutic bronchoscopy increases the long-term survival of patients with malignant airway obstruction. The risk-benefit ratio was favorable.

A 12-year experience in endobronchial intervention using rigid bronchoscopy - account of a tertiary referral centre

We describe our experience of rigid bronchoscopy and endobronchial intervention at a single tertiary centre over a 12-year period. All rigid bronchoscopy procedures between July 2008 and July 2020 (inclusive) were reviewed. All procedures were performed in cardiothoracic theatres by a designated team under general anaesthesia. 2135 rigid bronchoscopies were performed on 1301 patients aged between 18 and 93 years. Complications occurred in 24 (1.12%) procedures. There was one fatality (0.05%). Haemorrhage >100mls occurred in seven (0.33%) all of which were successfully managed endobronchially. Ten procedures (0.5%) were complicated by pneumothorax and an intercostal drain was required for eight. Five patients required intensive care admission post operatively, all of whom were subsequently discharged from hospital. One patient had stent migration. To the best of our knowledge, this is amongst the largest single centre collection of data available for endobronchial intervention using rigid bronchoscopy. We show that rigid bronchoscopy is a safe and effective procedure when performed in a high-volume specialist centre with designated lists involving a specialist multidisciplinary team.

Choice of bronchoscopic intervention working channel for benign central airway stenosis

The purpose of this study is to report our experiences over 12 years with bronchoscopic interventions in patients with benign central airway stenosis using three types of working channels (rigid bronchoscope, laryngeal mask, and endotracheal intubation), with a focus on their related advantages, disadvantages, and postoperative complications. We analyzed the clinical data from 273 patients with benign central airway stenosis who underwent a bronchoscopic intervention. The Wilcoxon rank-sum test was used to analyze the immediate results after the first bronchoscopic intervention, and the Chi-square test was used to analyze the correlation between glottic edema and operation time. The 273 patients underwent a total of 479 bronchoscopic interventions, with satisfactory results. The immediate effective rates of the first bronchoscopic intervention by rigid bronchoscope, laryngeal mask, and endotracheal intubation were 91.4%, 91.3%, and 85.2%, respectively. Postoperative complications related to the working channels included hoarseness, glottic edema, pharyngalgia, paresthesia pharynges, cough, and tooth loss. Glottic edema was the most serious complication, and it occurred in 37.7% (23/61) of the rigid bronchoscope group and 9.8% (32/326) in the laryngeal mask group. And the incidence rate was significantly correlated with the operation time (P < 0.01). Therefore, for patients with benign central airway stenosis, the best choice of working channel during an operation should be made by the operation procedure, lesion location, and pathology of the patients. Shortening the operation time was an important factor in preventing glottic edema.

Endobronchial Tumor With Ball Valve Mechanism: A Real Airway Emergency

Central airway obstruction due to the tumor can present as near-complete tracheal obstruction. The results can be life-threatening requiring emergent intervention. Rigid bronchoscopy has been preferred for the management of central airway obstruction. However, there are relatively few studies comparing rigid bronchoscopy and flexible bronchoscopy in treating these cases. We describe a 61-year-old woman with a lower trachea tumor with ball valve occlusion of the left mainstem bronchus and complete occlusion of the right mainstem bronchus successfully managed with flexible bronchoscopy and iCAST^® stent. We herein highlight the role of therapeutic flexible bronchoscopy with airway stenting as an efficacious treatment modality for the management of malignant central airway obstruction. 

Performance and safety of diagnostic procedures in superior vena cava syndrome

Superior vena cava syndrome (SVCS) is an uncommon condition resulting from extrinsic compression or intraluminal blockade of the superior vena cava. The increased upper body venous pressure results in distended subcutaneous vessels and oedema of the head, neck and arms. SVCS can be a medical emergency if associated with laryngeal or cerebral oedema. The most common SVCS aetiologies are intrathoracic malignancies, accounting for 60 to 86% of cases [1–3].

Standard bronchoscopy and EBUS-TBNA have good diagnostic yield and are relatively safe procedures in the setting of SVCS. However, complications may arise from the underlying malignancy and its proximity to central vital structures.https://bit.ly/37HXFUY

The role of interventional bronchoscopy in the management of post-intubation tracheal stenosis: A 20-year experience

PURPOSE

Benign tracheal stenosis management is still controversial, and there is no international consensus on the best treatment option. Thus, we aimed to look into the history of PITS and the different strategies used in its treatment. The importance of bronchoscopic treatment was also defined, and its effectiveness and safety were assessed.

METHODS

Retrospective study of patients diagnosed with PITS, who were referred to the Bronchology Department between January 1996 and December 2016.

RESULTS

Of 115 patients enrolled (mean age 48.5±17.6 years, 53% males), 66.1% had complex stenosis. The most common causes of intubation were respiratory (29.9%), neurological (26.8%) and surgical (19.6%). Complex stenosis was caused by longer intubation, and was more frequent among previously tracheostomized patients. The most common location was the upper third of trachea (60.9%). Most cases were initially treated by interventional bronchoscopy, and although serial dilations were effective in some complex PITS, a higher proportion of simple stenosis was successfully managed with this treatment option. Long-term recurrence after serial dilation was observed in 25.0% of cases. Stent placement was required (19.1%) only for complex PITS. Stent-related complications were frequent (61.9%) and linked to the stenting time (p<0.001). Overall, there were no procedure-related complications. Surgical intervention was also performed (30.0%), always with complex PITS. Post-surgical recurrences were observed in 24.2% of cases.

CONCLUSIONS

Interventional bronchoscopy is an efficient and safe modality in PITS management. Further studies are needed for better classification and improved knowledge of PITS pathogenesis, and to achieve international consensus of definition to guide clinicians in their practice.

Thoracoscopic foreign body removal and repair of bronchus intermedius following injury during failed bronchoscopic retrieval

Aspiration of foreign body (FB) into the airways is common in children and continues to be a cause for morbidity and mortality. We report herein, successful thoracoscopic management of a child who aspirated a large magnetic FB into his right bronchus and developed a tear of bronchus intermedius (BI) during an attempt at bronchoscopic retrieval using rigid bronchoscope. The impacted FB was successfully removed thoracoscopically followed by thoracoscopic BI repair.

Evaluation of the patient undergoing respiratory endoscopic procedures

Endoscopic techniques can be considered reasonably safe since they are widely used and the rate of complications is extremely low. Still complications do occur and in order to avoid them, the evaluation of the patient before and after any intervention is of the utmost importance. In this article, issues concerning the preparation of the patient and informed consent, the general assessment - medical history, current medications, physical examination, laboratory tests, radiological evaluation and analysis of the indication and planning will be addressed. The post intervention evaluation will also be discussed, in order to detect and treat complications and decide on the final guidance for the patient after discharge. There are very few up-to-date studies or publications dealing with these areas, the evidence level remains low and most recommendations are based on common sense and expert opinion.