Laparoscopy compared with laparoscopically guided minilaparotomy for large adnexal masses: a randomized controlled trial

The Evaluation, Diagnosis, and Management of Ovarian Cysts, Masses, and Their Complications in Fetuses, Infants, Children, and Adolescents

The majority of abdominal masses in female children derive from the ovaries. Ovarian masses in pediatric populations can vary from simple functional cysts to malignant neoplasms. Their incidence, clinical presentation, and histological distribution vary across age groups. In the assessment of ovarian masses in children, the primary aim is to determine the probability of malignancy, as the treatment approaches for benign and malignant lesions are significantly distinct. The primary imaging tool for evaluating ovarian cysts and masses is ultrasound, which can assess the size, location, and characteristics of masses. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) or computed tomography (CT) may be used for further evaluation if ultrasound findings are inconclusive or if malignancy is suspected, especially in older adolescents. Serum markers may be considered in older adolescents to help assess the risk of malignancy, though it is less useful in younger populations due to normal developmental variations. Many functional ovarian cysts, especially those detected in fetuses or infants, often resolve spontaneously without intervention. Surgical intervention is indicated in cases of large cysts that cause symptoms, or if there are concerns for malignancy. Common procedures include primarily ovarian sparing laparoscopy or laparotomy. Complications like torsion, rupture, or hemorrhage may require urgent surgical intervention. Treatment should be performed in specialized centers to avoid unnecessary oophorectomies and ensure the best possible outcome for the patient. This comprehensive review aims to provide an overview of the evaluation, diagnosis, and treatment of ovarian masses in the pediatric population. Emphasis is placed on the particularities of the lesions and their management in relation to age subgroups.

The role of minimally invasive surgery in epithelial ovarian cancer treatment: a narrative review

Objectives

The aim of this narrative review is to summarize the available evidence on the use of minimal invasive surgery (MIS) in the management of epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC).

Background

MIS is currently performed to stage and treat EOC at different stage of presentation. We will evaluate risks and benefits of minimally invasive surgery for early stage EOC treatment, then potential advantages provided by staging laparoscopy in identifying patients suitable for primary cytoreductive surgery (PDS) will be discussed. Finally we will investigate the growing role of MIS in the treatment of advanced EOC after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) and in the treatment of EOC recurrence.

Methods

An electronic database search was performed on PubMed, Medline, and Google Scholar for relevant studies up to December 2022.

Conclusion

LPS represents a feasible surgical procedure for the staging and treatment in early, advanced and EOC relapse in selected patients treated in high-volume oncological centers by surgeons with adequate experience in advanced surgical procedures. Despite the increasing use of MIS over the last few years, randomized clinical trials are still needed to prove its effectiveness.

Laparoscopic surgery of large adnexal masses (>12 cm): Single port or conventional?

INTRODUCTION

We aimed to compare single-port laparoscopic surgery (SPLS) and conventional multiport laparoscopic surgery (CMLS) for large adnexal mass (AM).

METHODS

Patients undergoing laparoscopy (LS) due to huge AMs (≥12 cm) between 2016 and 2021 were evaluated retrospectively. The SPLS procedure was applied in 25 cases, and CMLS was performed in 32 cases. The premier result was the grade of the postoperative improvement according to the Quality of Recovery (QoR)-40 questionnaire score (24 h after the surgical procedure; postoperative day 1). Observer Scar Assessment Scale (OSAS) and Patient Observer Scar Assessment Scale (PSAS) were also evaluated.

RESULTS

A total of 57 cases undergoing SPLS (n = 25) or CMLS (n = 32) due to a large AM (≥12 cm) were analyzed. No meaningful distinctions in age, menopausal status, body mass index, or mass size were observed between the two cohorts. The operation time was shorter in the SPLS than CPLS cohort (42.2 ± 3.3 vs. 47.6 ± 6.2; p < 0.001). Unilateral salpingo-oophorectomy was performed in 84.0% of cases in the SPLS cohort and 90.6% of patients in the CMLS cohort (p = 0.360). The QoR-40 points were significantly higher in the SPLS than the CMLS group (154.9 ± 12.0 vs. 146.2 ± 17.1; p = 0.035). The OSAS and PSAS scores were lower in the SPLS than the CMLS group.

CONCLUSION

LS can be used for large cysts that are not considered to be at risk of malignancy. The postoperative recovery time was shorter in patients undergoing SPLS compared to CMLS.

Laparoscopic guided minilaparotomy: a modified technique for management of benign large ovarian cysts

BACKGROUND

The aim of the study is to evaluate the efficiency and safety of a novel technique to treat large benign ovarian cysts combining benefits of laparoscopic management along with mini-laparotomy without affection of the ovarian reserve.

METHODS

The study included 112 women with large benign ovarian cyst candidate for ovarian cystectomy. The technique started with laparoscopy followed by guided cyst aspiration followed by exteriorization of the ovary through minilaprotomy and completion of cystectomy through microsurgical technique. The primary outcome was ipsilateral recurrence of the cyst. Other outcomes included ovarian reserve assessment and postoperative pain.

RESULTS

The number of women with recurrence in the ipsilateral ovary after 12, 18 and 24 months were 5 (4.5%),16 (14.3%),20 (17.85%) respectively. Assessment of ovarian reserve revealed a significant decrease in the level of serum AMH (2.82 ± 0.44 vs. 2.50 ± 0.42) and a significant increase in AFC (3.5 ± 1.7 vs. 4.9 ± 1.3) after our novel technique in surgical treatment of ovarian cysts (P value < 0.001). The operative time was 50 ± 7 and 62 ± 7 min in unilateral and bilateral cysts respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Laparoscopic guided minilaparotomy is a safe and effective technique for the management of large benign ovarian cysts with minimal recurrence rate, ovarian reserve affection and adhesions.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

clinical trial registry no. NCT03370952. Registered 13 December 2017, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03370952.

Controlled aspiration of large paediatric ovarian cystic tumours

AIM

Cystic ovarian masses in children may be physiological or neoplastic. It is mandatory that suspected neoplastic lesions are resected without tumour spillage. However, a large midline incision is cosmetically unappealing incision to young women. Here we describe our experience of using controlled drainage without spillage that allows a cosmetic pfannenstiel approach without compromising oncological principles.

METHOD

All girls treated with large ovarian cystic masses since 2008 in our centre were identified and data was collected prospectively. A small pfannenstiel incision was performed followed by peritoneal washings; tissue glue was used to stick an Opsite™ dressing to the cyst surface and fluid drained so there was no leakage back into the patient. Once aspirated the cyst was delivered and an ovarian preserving cystectomy was performed where possible.

RESULTS

Twenty-three girls (median age 14.5 years (8.1 to 16.5 years) were included. Pre-operative MRI scan showed a complex lesions with median volume of 1169 ml (range 252-7077 ml). At surgery 22/23 cysts were intact and removed without spillage.

HISTOLOGY

mature teratoma (11), serous cyst (3), mucinous cyst adenocarcinoma (2), mucinous cystadenoma (5), Sertoli-Leydig tumour, sclerosing stromal tumour. One girl with pre-operative rupture of a mucinous adenocarcinoma subsequently died. Ovarian sparing cystectomy was performed in 17/23 girls. All other patients are well without evidence of recurrence.

CONCLUSION

This is the largest series in children and adolescents using controlled drainage of cystic ovarian tumours. Though there were a range of diagnoses we have shown that these can be removed safely with a cosmetic pfannenstiel approach while following oncological principles.

Complications in laparoscopic and robotic-assisted surgery: definitions, classifications, incidence and risk factors - an up-to-date review

Almost all gynecological and general-surgical operations are - or can be - performed laparoscopically. In comparison to an abdominal approach, the minimally invasive access offers several advantages; however, laparoscopy (both conventional and robotic-assisted) can be associated with a number of approach-specific complications. Although the majority of them are related to the laparoscopic entry, adverse events may also occur due to the presence of pneumoperitoneum or the use of laparoscopic instruments. Unfortunately, a high proportion of complications (especially affecting the bowel and ureter) remain unrecognized during surgery. This narrative review provides comprehensive up-to-date information about definitions, classifications, risk factors and incidence of surgical complications in conventional and robotic-assisted laparoscopy, with a special focus on gynecology. The topic is discussed from various perspectives, e.g. in the context of stage of surgery, injured organs, involved instruments, and in relation to malpractice claims.

Fast Leak-Proof, Intraumbilical, Single-Incision Laparoscopic Ovarian Cystectomy for Huge Ovarian Masses: "Hybrid Cystectomy and Reimplantation" Method

Background and Objectives: To introduce a new technique for fast leakage-proof, intraumbilical, single-incision laparoscopic ovarian cystectomy for huge ovarian masses (>10 cm) Materials and Methods: Seven consecutive, reproductive-aged women, including three adolescents, with huge ovarian masses (mature cystic teratoma, n = 4; endometrioma, n = 2; and mucinous cystadenoma, n = 1) who underwent transumbilical single-incision ovarian cystectomy with the new “hybrid cystectomy and reimplantation” method were included. The procedure was: (1) trans-umbilical single-incision laparoscopy; (2) inspection of the pelvic cavity and placing the mass in a laparoscopic endo-bag for cystic content leakage prevention; (3) in-bag resection using cold scissors and minimal cauterization of the cystectomy site; (4) in-bag tissue extraction; (5) rapid extracorporeal cystectomy with traction without electrocautery; (6) re-insertion of the retrieved ovarian cortex intracorporeally through the single port, and (7) intracorporeal suture of the retrieved tissue to the in situ ovary. Results: The mean patient age was 24.71 ± 6.56 (range 17–37) years and the mean maximal diameter of the masses was 17.71 ± 2.86 (range 13–22) cm. There was no case of unintended intracorporeal cyst rupture and no need for copious irrigation for washing and suctioning the leaked mass content. The mean total operating time was 76.42 ± 6.39 (range 65–85) min, the total volume of saline used for irrigation was 814.28 ± 331.35 (range 500–1500) mL, and the estimated blood loss was 107.14 ± 47.72 (range 50–200) mL. There were no perioperative complications. All patients except the two endometriosis patients had regular, normal menstruation. Conclusions: Our preliminary findings were encouraging in terms of the safety and efficiency of the new method. Future trials need to elucidate the benefits of this method in terms of fertility preservation.

Role of minimally invasive surgery in early ovarian cancer

Despite having revolutionized the management of multiple types of gynecologic cancers laparoscopy and robotic surgery have had limited utility in ovarian cancer until recently. The development in medical technology allows surgeons to perform minimally invasive surgery (MIS) not only in early ovarian cancer, but also in advanced ovarian cancer. Thus far, most prospective studies showed feasible results of MIS in ovarian cancer. Even with many proven advantages of the MIS, there is no concrete evidence of the disparity in survival rate between laparoscopic, robotic surgery and laparotomy surgery. We reviewed the results of MIS in ovarian cancer thus far and suggest how the gynecologists can apply MIS in ovarian cancer in the future. Until the further prospective studies show solid evidence of safety in the MIS in ovarian cancer, comprehensive discussion about the benefits and risk with the patient and the level of surgical skill of the gynecologist should be considered in determining the type of surgery.

Role of minimally invasive surgery in complex adnexal tumours and ovarian cancer

Ovarian cancer is one of the most common causes of cancer-related death in women. Adnexal masses are frequently diagnosed during reproductive age and often require surgical removal. The risk of malignancy when dealing with a complex adnexal mass should be defined prior to surgery and several scoring systems may be useful for this purpose. Laparoscopic management of ovarian tumours allows a minimally invasive approach with respect to several oncological assumptions. In the last decade concerns have been raised regarding the risk of cyst rupture and tumour spillage as a consequence of the laparoscopic technique itself both in early and advanced stages of ovarian cancer. Although limited data have been reported in the literature on the use of minimally invasive techniques in ovarian cancer, the clear benefits of this approach must be balanced with the potential hazards in different clinical situations. Laparoscopic staging in borderline tumours and presumed early-stage ovarian cancer performed by a laparoscopic oncologist seems to be safe and effective when compared to laparotomy. The precise role of laparoscopy in patients with more advanced cancer is still to be defined, and the risk of suboptimal surgery should never outweigh the potential benefits of minimally invasive surgery. Thus, a tailored prediction of optimal laparoscopic debulking is mandatory in these patients.

Laparoscopic Management of Large Ovarian Cysts

The aim of this study was to describe a new technique for laparoscopic removal of large ovarian cystic masses. The authors performed a retrospective study during the period January 2008 to December 2009 in the Second Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology of Aretaieion University Hospital; 19 women with large ovarian cysts were included in the study. During the study period, 53 women underwent laparoscopic excision of ovarian cysts. Among them, 19 had very large complex ovarian cysts with a mean diameter of 8.4 cm. The mean age of the patients was 32.1 years. Ultrasound examination revealed findings suggestive of benign disease in all patients. In 8 out of 19 patients CA-125 levels were elevated, ranging from 40.5 to 194.7 IU/mL. A 5-mm suprapubic trocar was directly inserted into the cyst and fluid contents aspirated, so the decompressed cyst could fit in a 5-cm laparoscopic bag. The cyst wall was carefully detached from the healthy ovarian tissue and placed in the bag without any spillage. The remaining cyst wall was removed from the peritoneal cavity with the laparoscopic bag. The mean operative time was 45 minutes. No operative or postoperative complications were noted. There was no conversion to laparotomy. Mean hospital stay was 1 day. Pathology revealed 7 endometriomas, 3 mucinous cystadenomas, 3 serous cystadenomas, 3 serous cysts, and 3 teratomas. Direct trocar insertion within the ovarian cyst followed by aspiration of the fluid contents is a safe and feasible method for the laparoscopic management of large ovarian cysts.

Subjective assessment by ultrasound is superior to the risk of malignancy index (RMI) or the risk of ovarian malignancy algorithm (ROMA) in discriminating benign from malignant adnexal masses

PURPOSE

The combination of two tumour markers, CA125 and HE4, in the risk of ovarian malignancy assay (ROMA) has been shown to be successful in classifying patients into those who have a high or low risk of epithelial ovarian cancer. In the present study, the diagnostic accuracy of ROMA was assessed and compared to the diagnostic accuracy of the two most widely used ultrasound methods, namely the risk of malignancy index (RMI) and subjective assessment by ultrasound.

METHODS

From August, 2005 to March, 2009, 432 women with a pelvic mass who were scheduled to have surgery were enrolled in a single-centre prospective cohort study. A preoperative ultrasound was performed and preoperative CA125 and HE4 serum levels were measured. Once the final surgical pathology reports were obtained, the diagnostic accuracy and performance indices of ROMA, RMI and subjective assessment were calculated.

RESULTS

Of the 432 eligible patients, 374 could be analysed. Subjective assessment had the highest area under the receiver operator characteristic curve (AUC) (0.968, 95%CI:0.945-0.984), followed by the RMI (0.931, 95%CI:0.901-0.955). The subjective assessment and RMI both had significantly higher AUCs than the ROMA (0.893, 95%CI:0.857-0.922; P<0.0001 and P=0.0030, respectively). The pre- and postmenopausal populations generated similar results.

CONCLUSION

Although new tumour markers models are promising, they do not contribute significantly to the diagnosis of ovarian cancer. Ultrasound, especially subjective assessment by ultrasound, remains superior in discriminating malignant from benign ovarian masses.

Adnexal masses suspected to be benign treated with laparoscopy

OBJECTIVE

Guidelines for referring women with pelvic masses suspicious for ovarian cancer to gynecologic oncologists have been developed by the American College of Obstetrician Gynecologists (ACOG). We set out to evaluate the negative predictive value of these guidelines and to assess a modified algorithm involving minimally invasive surgery in the treatment of women with masses suspected to be benign.

METHODS

257 consecutive patients with adnexal masses of 8cm to 13cm on preoperative ultrasound examination meeting Triage Criteria set forth in ACOG Committee Opinion 280. Patients meeting the selection criteria were scheduled for operative laparoscopy, washings, adnexectomy, bagging, and colpotomy. A total of 240 patients successfully completed intended treatment (93.38%), and 234 of these did not require admission (97.5%). There was a low incidence of significant complications: 97.50% of women were successfully treated as outpatients, 97.92% of surgeries lasted <136 minutes, and <97.08% had blood loss <200mL. The negative predictive value of ACOG Committee Opinion 280 Triage Criteria as a deselector for having invasive ovarian malignancy in our population was 95.57% for premenopausal and 90.91% for postmenopausal women.

CONCLUSIONS

Laparoscopic adnexectomy, bagging, and colpotomy is a desirable goal for patients with ovarian masses in the 8cm to 13cm range meeting selection criteria affording a minimally invasive approach with attendant benefits including outpatient treatment (97.5%), few complications, low likelihood of iatrogenic rupture of the ovarian capsule (1.25%), and low necessity for reoperation after final pathology is evaluated (6.03%). Negative predictive value of ACOG Committee Opinion 280 is confirmed in a community gynecology practice and is recommended to form the basis of a new treatment algorithm for women with adnexal masses.

Laparoscopically guided minilaparotomy: a minimally invasive approach for the treatment of gynaecologic diseases in morbidly obese patients

OBJECTIVE

Obese patients are at greater risk of gynaecologic surgery. Laparotomy is generally performed, even though this approach is regarded as highly invasive, whereas laparoscopy, though minimally invasive, is relatively contraindicated because of the high conversion rates to laparotomy. In light of this, we propose laparoscopically guided transverse minilaparotomy (LGTM) as a minimally invasive alternative technique. The rationale of diagnostic laparoscopy is to evaluate the feasibility of a minimally invasive approach. We have evaluated the feasibility and compared the outcomes with a historical group treated with laparotomy (LPTM), in morbidly obese patients (MOP) subjected to gynaecologic surgery.

STUDY DESIGN

From November 2004, MOPs with body mass index (BMI) ≥ 40 kg/m² and admitted for gynaecologic surgery (early stage endometrial cancer and benign disease) were enrolled in this observational study and submitted to LGTM. Patients with a uterine size greater than the umbilical transverse line and with indication for vaginal surgery were excluded operative data and outcome were prospectively recorded.

RESULTS

LGTM was feasible in 34 cases (87%) out of 39. In two women, the procedure was aborted due to intraperitoneal and ovarian malignant disease spread diagnosed at laparoscopy. In three cases, conversion was necessary due to severe adhesions in one case; laparoscopically unrecognized disease spread in the parametria in the second, and in the remaining case a right common iliac vein injury during lymphadenectomy. When compared to LPTM, haemoglobin drop and postoperative stay were significantly reduced with LGTM. Complications were higher in the control group: due to a significantly higher incidence of wound dehiscence (OR 0.27, 95% CI 0.05-1.32, p<0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

LGTM is feasible in the vast majority of MOPs and achieves significantly better results when compared to the standard approach.

Single-port transumbilical laparoscopic-assisted adnexal surgery

Single-port transumbilical laparoscopic-assisted surgery for large, benign adnexal tumors was found to be a feasible alternative to conventional laparoscopic or open surgical methods.

Objectives:

To evaluate the efficiency and feasibility of single-port access transumbilical laparoscopic-assisted surgery in patients with large (>8cm) adnexal tumors and to present our initial experience.

Methods:

Twenty-two patients with presumably benign adnexal tumors who have undergone single-port access transumbilical laparoscopic-assisted surgery were enrolled. The procedure was performed using the method of exteriorization and extracorporeal surgery of adnexal tumors outside the abdominal cavity under laparoscopic guidance with preservation of as much ovarian tissue as possible. In each case, a homemade single-port device was inserted into the abdomen through a 2-cm umbilical incision. The clinical characteristics and operative outcomes of these patients were reviewed.

Results:

Twenty of 22 cases were completed successfully. The one failed case required an additional trocar for adequate adhesiolysis, and the other case needed intraperitoneal drainage. The median operating time was 50 minutes (range, 35 to 120), and the estimated blood loss was 38mL (range, 10 to 300). Cyst rupture occurred in 2 cases, but there were no major postoperative complications.

Conclusion:

Single-port access transumbilical laparoscopic-assisted surgery for benign and relatively large adnexal tumors is feasible and could be an alternative to convention open laparotomy or laparoscopic surgery.

The approach to ovarian dermoids in adolescents and young women

BACKGROUND

Mature cystic teratomas (MCTs) are the most common ovarian neoplastic lesions found in adolescents. MCTs are usually asymptomatic and are often discovered incidentally on exam or imaging. The recurrence rate of MCTs following cystectomy is 3-4% and incidence of malignant transformation is estimated to be 0.17-2%. Given the accuracy with which MCTs can be diagnosed preoperatively studies suggest that these lesions can be treated surgically using laparoscopic techniques. The management of MCTs in the adolescent population poses unique challenges given the potential impact on sexual development and fertility.

CASE

A 17-year-old female was found to have bilateral adnexal masses consistent in appearance with MCTs on computed tomography after a motor vehicle accident. She underwent exploratory laparotomy with pathology confirming the presence of bilateral ovarian MCTs. Three years later she returned to the office with occasional abdominopelvic pain. Ultrasound revealed bilateral complex cysts suggestive of recurrent MCTs. She was expectantly managed with serial ultrasounds and after 24 months, slow but visible growth of the MCTs was confirmed. The patient is now 22 years old and asymptomatic. What is the most appropriate management?

SUMMARY AND CONCLUSION

The risks of expectant management in women like the one presented are small. This suggests that although the traditional treatment for MCTs is laparoscopic ovarian cystectomy, in children and adolescents with MCTs we should consider close follow-up without intervention to preserve ovarian function and future fertility.

One-Step Laparoscopic Management of a Female Adnexal Tumor of Wolffian Origin

We report a case of female adnexal tumor of Wolffian origin (FATWO), a rare neoplasm arising from the mesonephric ducts. A 48-year-old woman came first to our center for a recent discovery of a pelvic mass. Transvaginal ultrasonographic findings suggested a solid right para-ovarian mass suspected to be malignant. After thorough counseling, the patient underwent operative laparoscopy for excision of the para-ovarian mass with frozen section (FS) examination resulting in the diagnosis of a poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma. In this case, FS results allowed performing a comprehensive oncological staging, through a totally laparoscopic extrafascial hysterectomy, bilateral adnexectomy, total omentectomy, pelvic wall peritonectomy, and pelvic, parasacral and para-aortic lymphadenectomy. Final pathological and immunohistochemical results confirmed the diagnosis of FATWO. To our knowledge, this is the first case of FATWO managed entirely by a minimally invasive laparoscopic approach in a single surgical session.

Laparoscopy versus laparotomy for benign ovarian tumour

BACKGROUND

Over the last 10 years laparoscopy and minilaparotomy have become increasingly common approaches for the surgical removal of benign ovarian tumours. However, in the event that a tumour is found to be malignant, laparotomy is the appropriate procedure. Careful preoperative assessment including transvaginal ultrasound with morphological scoring, colour doppler assessment of vascular quality, and serum cancer antigen 125 (CA 125) level is desirable.

OBJECTIVES

To determine the benefits, harms, and cost of laparoscopy or minilaparotomy compared with laparotomy in women with benign ovarian tumours.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched electronic databases, trial registers, and reference lists of published trial reports. Reference lists from trials and review articles were searched.

SELECTION CRITERIA

All randomised controlled trials comparing either laparoscopy or minilaparotomy with laparotomy for benign ovarian tumours.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Eight review authors independently assessed the eligibility and quality of each study and extracted the data.

MAIN RESULTS

The results of nine randomised controlled trials (N = 482 women) showed that laparoscopic surgery was associated with fewer adverse events of surgery (surgical injury or postoperative complications including fever or infection) (OR 0.3, 95% CI 0.2 to 0.5), less postoperative pain (VAS score WMD -2.4, 95% CI -2.7 to -2.0), greater likelihood of being pain free after two days (OR 7.42, 95% CI 4.86 to 11.33), and fewer days in hospital (WMD -2.88, 95% CI -3.1 to -2.7) than with laparotomy.In one study that reported costs, laparoscopy was associated with a significant reduction in costs compared to laparotomy (WMD - USD 1045, 95% CI -1348 to -742) in 1993. Very high levels of heterogeneity made it inappropriate to pool data on duration of surgery.Three RCTs compared laparoscopy versus minilaparotomy and found that laparoscopy was associated with reduced odds of any adverse event (surgical injury or postoperative complications) (OR 0.10, 95% CI 0 to 0.8) and lower VAS scores for pain (WMD -1.0, 95% CI -1.6 to -0.45). Duration of hospital stay ranged between 1 and 2.2 days, with substantial heterogeneity.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

In women undergoing surgery for benign ovarian tumours, laparoscopy was associated with a reduction in fever, urinary tract infection, postoperative complications, postoperative pain, number of days in hospital, and total cost. These findings should be interpreted with caution since only a small number of studies were identified. These included a total of only 769 women and not all of the important outcomes were reported in each study.

Laparoscopic removal of adnexal cysts: is it possible to decrease inadvertent intraoperative rupture rate?

OBJECTIVE

The objective of the study was to characterize surgical risks for intraoperative rupture of benign adnexal lesions during laparoscopy.

STUDY DESIGN

We conducted a retrospective review of cases of laparoscopic removal of ovarian cysts (adnexectomy or cystectomy) in our institution from 2002-2006, excluding procedures in which cysts were intentionally ruptured.

RESULTS

There were 256 operations (263 ovarian cysts). The patients' mean age was 40.9 +/- 15.8 years. The overall rate of inadvertent intraoperative rupture of cyst was 16.6% (adnexectomies 7.4% and conservative cystectomies 29.5%; P < .001). There was no significant correlation between inadvertent intraoperative rupture and adnexal torsion, pelvic adhesions, bilateral adnexal surgery, concomitant uterine surgery, presence of pelvic endometriotic foci, pregnancy, and surgeons' experience. Only cyst size and cystectomy procedure were positively and significantly associated with inadvertent cyst rupture (multivariate regression analysis).

CONCLUSION

Inadvertent intralaparoscopic rupture of adnexal cyst is significantly associated with cystectomies of large ovarian cysts for which laparotomy or laparoscopic-assisted extracorporeal cystectomy should be considered.

Should adnexal mass size influence surgical approach? A series of 186 laparoscopically managed large adnexal masses

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the feasibility and safety of laparoscopic management of adnexal masses > or = 10 cm in size.

DESIGN

Prospective cohort study.

SETTING

Two Gynecology Departments of University Hospitals.

POPULATION

All women presenting with an adnexal mass > or = 10 cm in diameter were candidates for laparoscopic management. Women were excluded from laparoscopic approach if there was evidence of ascites or gross metastatic disease. Neither the sonographic features of the cyst nor elevated serum CA125 level was used to exclude women from having a laparoscopic approach.

METHODS

A single operative protocol was followed for all women. All removed specimens were sent for immediate pathological evaluation.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Rate of conversion to laparotomy, incidence of cancer encountered, and operative complications.

RESULTS

One hundred and eighty-six women underwent laparoscopic evaluation for an adnexal mass of 10 cm or larger in size. The average preoperative mass size was 12.1 +/- 4.9 cm. A benign pathological condition was found in 86.6% (161/186) of the women, primary ovarian cancer in 16 (8.6%) women, a metastatic tumour of gastrointestinal origin in 1 (0.5%) woman, and a low malignant potential ovarian tumour in 8 (4.3%) women. Laparoscopic management was successful for 174 (93.5%) women. Reasons for conversion to laparotomy included anticipated technical difficulty (n = 7) and malignancy (n = 5). No intraoperative complications occurred in the entire study group.

CONCLUSIONS

The vast majority of large adnexal masses can be safely resected laparoscopically, provided that there is expertise in laparoscopic surgery, immediate access to frozen section diagnosis, and preparation of patient to receive an adequate cancer surgery where indicated.

Laparoscopy versus laparotomy for benign ovarian tumours

BACKGROUND

Over the last ten years laparoscopy has become an increasingly common approach for the surgical removal of benign ovarian tumours. There remains uncertainty as to the value of this intervention. This review has been undertaken to assess the available evidence for the benefits and harms of laparoscopic surgery for benign ovarian tumours compared to laparotomy.

OBJECTIVES

To determine the efficacy, safety and cost of laparoscopic surgery compared with laparotomy in women with ovarian tumours assumed to be benign.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched electronic databases, trials registers and reference lists of published trial reports. Review articles were also searched.

SELECTION CRITERIA

All randomised controlled trials comparing laparoscopy versus laparotomy for benign ovarian tumours.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Three reviewers independently assessed each study's eligibility and quality and extracted data.

MAIN RESULTS

Six randomised controlled trials were identified involving 324 patients. Three subgroups of ovarian tumours were considered: any histological type of benign ovarian tumour, dermoid cysts and endometriomata. Surgical outcomes: The mean duration of surgery was longer in the laparoscopy group compared to the laparotomy group overall (WMD 11.39; 95% CI 0.57 to 22.22). However, heterogeneity was present with substantial inconsistency (I(2)=87%) . The heterogeneity found in these analyses was likely to reflect differences in the patient populations. Adverse effects of surgery: The pooled estimate for febrile morbidity decreased for laparoscopy compared to laparotomy (Peto OR 0.34; 95% CI 0.13 to 0.88). The odds of any adverse effect of surgery (total number of complications - surgical injury and/or post operative complications) were decreased after laparoscopic procedures (Peto OR 0.26; 95% CI 0.12 to 0.55). Short-term recovery: VAS pain scores favoured laparoscopy (WMD -2.36; 95% CI -2.07 to -2.03) andt he odds of being pain free were significantly greater for the laparoscopy group compared to laparotomy (Peto OR 7.35; 95% CI 4.3 to 12.56). Mean length of hospital stay was shorter in the laparoscopy group with reduction 2.79 days (95% CI -2.95 to -2.62) compared to laparotomy. Economic outcomes: There was a significant reduction of US$1045 (95% CI -1361 to -726.97) in the laparoscopy group compared to the laparotomy group in one trial of women with any type of benign ovarian tumour.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

In women undergoing surgery for benign ovarian tumours, laparoscopy is associated with a reduction in the following; febrile morbidity, urinary tract infection, post operative complications, post operative pain, days in hospital and total cost. These findings should be interpreted with caution as only a small number of studies were identified including a total of only 324 women and not all of the important outcomes were reported in each study.