Use of Fibrin Sealant for Split-Thickness Skin Grafts in Patients with Hand Burns: A Prospective Cohort Study

Sticking to What Matters: A Matched Comparative Study of Fibrin Glue and Mechanical Fixation for Split-Thickness Skin Grafts in the Lower Extremity

Background: Split-thickness skin grafts (STSGs) remain a valuable tool in the reconstructive surgeons' armamentarium. Staple or suture mechanical fixation (MF) serves as the gold standard of care, though fibrin glue (FG) has gained popularity as a fixation modality. We compare STSG outcomes following application of FG versus MF through a study of lower extremity wounds. Methods: A retrospective review (2016-2019) of patients who underwent a STSG was performed. Two cohorts consisting of patients undergoing a STSG with FG or MF (suture or staple) were matched according to wound size, wound location, and body mass index. Results: A total of 67 patients with 79 wounds were included (FG: n = 30, wounds = 39; MF: n = 37; wounds = 40). There was no significant difference between groups regarding time to 100% graft take (FG: 39 days, MF: 35.1 days; P < .384) or 180-day graft complications (FG: 10.3%, MF: 15%; P < .737). Adjusted operative time for FG (51.8 min) was lower than for MF cases (67.5 min) at a level that approached significance (P < .094). FG patients were significantly less likely to require a postoperative wound vacuum-assisted closure (VAC) (FG: 16.7%; MF: 76.7%; P < .001) and required a significantly lower number of 30-day postoperative visits (FG: 1.5 ± .78 visits; MF: 2.5 ± .03 visits; P < .001). The MF group had higher mean aggregate charges ($211,090) compared with the FG group (mean: $149,907), although these were not statistically significant (P > .05). Conclusion: The use of FG for STSG shows comparable clinical outcomes to MF, with a significantly decreased need for postoperative wound VAC, the number of 30-day postoperative visits, and a lower wound-adjusted operative time.

An Outcome Analysis of Fibrin Sealant versus Staples for Fixation of Split-Thickness Skin Grafts

Background  Skin grafting plays a vital role in post-burn and post-traumatic wound management. Split-thickness skin grafts (STSG) are traditionally fixed using staples or sutures, which have tedious application and their removal necessitates painkillers, medical equipment, and human intervention. As an alternative, fibrin sealant is a biological tissue adhesive, composed of thrombin, calcium, and fibrinogen. Fibrin sealant promotes hemostasis and acts as a biological adherent. Objective  The aim of this study was to evaluate the outcomes (graft take, wound healing and complications) of fibrin sealant and staples for STSG fixation. Methods  It is a randomized controlled trial on 40 patients with wounds of minimum 400 cm 2 . Wound area was divided into equal halves and randomly allocated to the study group or control group. In the study group, 4 mL per 200 cm 2 of fibrin sealant was sprayed followed by STSG application. In the control group, STSG was fixed with only skin staples. Evaluation was done on postoperative days 3, 5, 15, and 30 for graft take, hematoma/seroma, infection, and complete wound healing. Results  The mean graft take was significantly higher ( p -value < 0.05) in the study group than in the control group (91 vs. 89%). No seroma or hematoma formation was seen in either group. Complete wound healing was seen in more patients in the study group, but the difference was statistically insignificant. Conclusion  Fibrin sealant is an excellent alternative to staples for skin grafting, with the advantage of better graft take and being free of pain that is incurred during staple removal.

Topical Hemostatic Agents in Burn Surgery: A Systematic Review

Acute burn surgery has long been associated with significant intra-operative bleeding. Several techniques were introduced to limit hemorrhage, including tourniquets, tumescent infiltration, and topical agents. To date, no study has comprehensively investigated the available data regarding topical hemostatic agents in burn surgery. A systematic review was performed by two independent reviewers using electronic databases (PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science) from first available to September 10, 2021. Articles were included if they were published in English and described or evaluated topical hemostatic agents used in burn excision and/or grafting. Data were extracted on the agent(s) used, their dosage, mode of delivery, hemostasis outcomes, and complications. The search identified 1982 nonduplicate citations, of which 134 underwent full-text review, and 49 met inclusion criteria. In total, 32 studies incorporated a vasoconstrictor agent, and 28 studies incorporated a procoagulant agent. Four studies incorporated other agents (hydrogen peroxide, tranexamic acid, collagen sheets, and TT-173). The most common vasoconstrictor used was epinephrine, with doses ranging from 1:1000 to 1:1,000,000. The most common procoagulant used was thrombin, with doses ranging from 10 to 1000 IU/ml. Among the comparative studies, outcomes of blood loss were not reported in a consistent manner, therefore meta-analysis could not be performed. The majority of studies (94%) were level of evidence III-V. Determining the optimal topical hemostatic agent is limited by low-quality data and challenges with consistent reporting of intra-operative blood loss. Given the routine use of topical hemostatic agents in burn surgery, high-quality research is essential to determine the optimal agent, dosage, and mode of delivery.

Wound healing ability of acellular fish skin and bovine collagen grafts for split-thickness donor sites in burn patients: Characterization of acellular grafts and clinical application

Due to its high polyunsaturated fatty acid content, acellular fish skin has emerged as a dermal substitute for the promotion of wound healing as it decreases scar formation while providing pain relief. However, various systematic studies on acellular fish skin, such as its biophysical analysis, in vitro activities, and clinical application, have not been sufficiently investigated. In this study, we conducted a comparative study to evaluate the wound-healing ability of acellular fish skin graft (Kerecis®) with that of the widely used bovine collagen skin graft (ProHeal®). The skin grafts were evaluated not only in terms of their biophysical properties, but also their in vitro cellular activities, using fibroblasts, keratinocytes, and human endothelial cells. The clinical study evaluated wound healing in 52 patients with acute burns who underwent skin grafting on donor sites from January 2019 to December 2020. The study was conducted with two groups; while only Kerecis® was tested in one group, Kerecis® and ProHeal® were compared in the other. In both groups, the application time of the dressing material was one to two days after split-thickness skin grafting to the donor sites. The Kerecis®-treatment group experienced faster healing than the other treatment group. In particular, the average wound healing time using the Kerecis® treatment and the ProHeal® treatment was 10.7 ± 1.5 days and 13.1 ± 1.4 days, respectively. We believe that the faster healing of the Kerecis® treatment, compared to that of the ProHeal® treatment, maybe due to the synergistic effect of the unique biophysical structure and the bioactive components of acellular fish skin.

Safeguarding Skin Grafts: An Evidence-Based Summary of Fixation Techniques

BACKGROUND

Effective skin graft fixation is vital in preventing sheering forces, seroma, and hematoma from compromising graft take. Yet, selecting the ideal technique for securing skin grafts remains a contentious subject, with significant variation in practice existing between surgeons. There is, therefore, benefit to be derived from assessing the literature for evidence-based recommendations to guide the decision-making process.

METHODS

A search of Medline and Embase was performed using appropriate key terms, yielding 419 articles. Reference lists were analyzed. Inclusion and exclusion criteria were composed. Level I to III studies, as defined by the Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine, that compared skin graft fixation methods were analyzed. Rayyan QCRI was used for abstract and title screening. After full text screening, 41 studies were included for qualitative analysis. All included randomized control trials (RCTs) were assessed for risk of bias using the Cochrane Risk-of-Bias 2 (ROB2) tool.

RESULTS

We identified 4 groups of fixation technique: "tie-over bolster" (TOB), "no TOB," "adhesive glues," and "negative pressure wound therapy" (NPWT). Twelve studies compared TOB with no TOB, with no difference in graft take demonstrated. Sixteen studies compared adhesive glues with traditional methods, with no difference in graft take demonstrated. Thirteen studies compared NPWT with traditional methods, with enhanced graft take demonstrated. Risk of bias was deemed low in 1 of 13 RCTs.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on the current evidence, only NPWT is associated with enhanced graft take. However, there is a scarcity of robust level I evidence comparing different fixation techniques, meaning that strong recommendations cannot be made. We propose examples of hypothesis-driven RCTs, in predetermined clinical settings, based on the theoretical benefits of the techniques that would add value to clinical practice.

Harnessing Multifaceted Next-Generation Technologies for Improved Skin Wound Healing

Dysregulation of sequential and synchronized events of skin regeneration often results in the impairment of chronic wounds. Conventional wound dressings fail to trigger the normal healing mechanism owing to the pathophysiological conditions. Tissue engineering approaches that deal with the fabrication of dressings using various biomaterials, growth factors, and stem cells have shown accelerated healing outcomes. However, most of these technologies are associated with difficulties in scalability and cost-effectiveness of the products. In this review, we survey the latest developments in wound healing strategies that have recently emerged through the multidisciplinary approaches of bioengineering, nanotechnology, 3D bioprinting, and similar cutting-edge technologies to overcome the limitations of conventional therapies. We also focus on the potential of wearable technology that supports complete monitoring of the changes occurring in the wound microenvironment. In addition, we review the role of advanced devices that can precisely enable the delivery of nanotherapeutics, oligonucleotides, and external stimuli in a controlled manner. These technological advancements offer the opportunity to actively influence the regeneration process to benefit the treatment regime further. Finally, the clinical relevance, trajectory, and prospects of this field have been discussed in brief that highlights their potential in providing a beneficial wound care solution at an affordable cost.

Acute Management of Thermal Hand Burns in Adults: A 10-Year Review of the Literature

INTRODUCTION

Advances in the evidence base of acute thermal hand burns help to guide the management of these common injuries. The aim of this literature review was to evaluate recent evidence in the field over 10 years.

METHODS

The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis Protocols methodology was used as a guide for this literature review. PubMed, MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, and Google Scholar were searched for English language articles related to hand burns published between 2009 and 2018 inclusive, and the Cochrane Library was reviewed. Exclusion criteria were as follows: participants younger than 18 years, scar or contracture management, rehabilitation, outcomes assessment, late reconstruction, and electrical or chemical burns.

RESULTS

An initial search retrieved 6493 articles, which was narrowed to 403 full-text articles that were reviewed independently by 3 of the authors and categorized. Of 202 included articles, there were 8 randomized controlled trials and 2 systematic reviews. Six evidence-based guidelines were reviewed. Referral of hand burns to specialist centers, use of telemedicine, early excision and grafting, and immediate static splintage have been recommended. Enzymatic debridement results in earlier intervention, more accurate burn assessment, preservation of vital tissue, and fewer skin grafts, and ideally requires regional anesthesia. Guidance on escharotomy emphasizes indication, technique and adequate intervention, and potential for enzymatic debridement. Inclusion of topical negative pressure, dermal regenerative templates, acellular dermal matrices, and noncellular skin substitutes in management has helped improve scar and functional outcomes.

DISCUSSION

The results of this literature review demonstrate that multiple national and international societies have published burns guidelines during the decade studied, with aspects directly relevant to hand burns, including the International Society for Burn Injuries guidelines. There are opportunities for evidence-based quality improvement across the field of hand burns in many centers.

CONCLUSIONS

More than 200 articles globally in 10 years outline advances in the understanding of acute management of thermal hand burns. Incorporating the evidence base into practice may facilitate optimization of triage referral pathways and acute management for hand burns.

Effectiveness of fibrin glue in skin graft survival: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

The objective of this study is to assess the current literature on the effectiveness of fibrin glue on survival of skin grafts. Fibrin glue is a possible alternative to secure skin grafts instead of traditional methods (i.e. sutures or staples).

Methods

Data Sources: MEDLINE, Scopus, Embase, Informit, CINAHL and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, no limit on the earliest date of publication.

Study eligibility criteria

Randomised, non-randomised controlled trials and cohort studies.

Participants

and Interventions: Participants were patients with skin grafting/skin transplantation. The intervention was fibrin glue in any form (bovine, human pooled plasma or autologous) and comparator any form of affixing skin grafts (e.g. sutures or staples).

Study Appraisal and Synthesis Methods: Studies were appraised using the Cochrane risk of bias tool and assessed for clinical heterogeneity. Effect sizes were calculated and illustrated with forest plots.

Results

190 publications were narrowed to 15 relevant publications, of which eight were pooled in meta-analysis. The outcomes examined were: graft survival by percentage; graft survival reported as events; post-operative incidence of haematoma or seroma; pain reported after dressing changes via a visual analogue scale; length of stay in days (Glass's delta 2 was 0.48 95% CI 0.09, 0.97); and surgical time in minutes. Only length of stay showed a difference between groups and it favoured fibrin glue.

Conclusions

While there may be benefits to the use of fibrin glue in skin graft patients, it is difficult to conclude this from the current evidence. Limitations were significant heterogeneity in outcomes measured and exclusion off non-English papers.

•

Largest systematic review of fibrin glue in skin grafts to date.

•

Both clinical and patient reported outcomes important in assessing skin grafts.

•

Significant Improvement in length of stay for skin graft patients with fibrin glue.

•

Meta-Analysis of graft survival, pain and operative time for skin graft patients who had fibrin glue.

Lipoconstruct surface topography grating size influences vascularization onset in the dorsal skinfold chamber model

After skin tissue injury or pathological removal, vascularization timing is paramount in graft survival. As full thickness skin grafts often fail to become perfused over larger surfaces, split-thickness grafts are preferred and can be used together with biomaterials, which themselves are non-angiogenic. One way of promoting vascular ingrowth is to "pre-vascularize" an engineered substitute by introducing endothelial cells (ECs). Since it has been previously demonstrated that surface structured biomaterials have an effect on wound healing, skin regeneration, and fibrosis reduction, we proposed that a microvascular-rich lipoconstruct with anisotropic topographical cues could be a clinically translatable vascularization approach. Murine lipofragments were formed with three polydimethylsiloxane molds (flat, 5 µm, and 50 µm parallel gratings) and implanted into the dorsal skinfold chamber of male C57BL/6 mice. Vascular ingrowth was observed through intravital microscopy over 21 days and further assessed by histology and protein identification. Our investigation revealed that topographical feature size influenced the commencement of neovascular ingrowth, with 5 µm gratings exhibiting early construct perfusion at 3 days post-operation, and 50 µm being delayed until day 5. We therefore postulate that surface structured lipoconstructs may serve as an easily obtained and produced construct suitable for providing soft tissue and ECs to tissue defects. STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANCE: Skin graft failures due to inadequate or uneven perfusion frequently occur and can be even more complicated in deep, difficult to heal wounds, or bone coverage. In complex injuries, biomaterials are often used to cover bone structures with a standard split thickness graft; however, perfusion can take up to 3 weeks. Thus, any means to promote faster and uniform vascularization could significantly reduce healing time, as well as lower patient down-time. As pre-vascularized constructs have reported success in research, we created a cost-efficient, translatable method with no additional laboratory time as adipose tissue can be harvested and used immediately. We further used surface topography as an aspect to modulate construct perfusion, which has been reported for the first time here.