Retroacetabular osteolysis: when to operate? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2004;247-255. [PMID: 15534550 DOI: 10.1097/01.blo.0000137562.89722.64]

Isolated Acetabular Liner Exchange for Polyethylene Wear and Osteolysis with Well-Fixed Metal Shell

Background

The isolated liner and head exchange procedure has been an established treatment method for polyethylene wear and osteolysis when the acetabular component remains well fixed. In this study, the mid-term results of this procedure were evaluated retrospectively.

Methods

Among the consecutive patients operated on from September 1995, two patients (three hips) were excluded because of inadequate follow-up, and the results of remaining 34 patients (34 hips) were evaluated. There were 20 men and 14 women with a mean age of 49 years. A conventional polyethylene liner was used in 26 cases and a highly cross-linked polyethylene liner was used in eight cases. In three cases, the liner was cemented in a metal shell because a compatible liner could not be used.

Results

After a follow-up of 5 to 20.2 years, re-revision surgery was necessary in 10 cases (29.4%): in eight for wear and osteolysis at 55 to 101 months after liner exchange and in two for acetabular loosening at 1 and 1.5 years after liner exchange. Re-revision surgery included all component revision (four cases), cup revision (four cases), and liner exchange (two cases). In all re-revision cases, a conventional polyethylene liner was used initially. There was no failure in the cases in which a highly cross-linked polyethylene liner was used.

Conclusions

The results of this study suggest that isolated acetabular liner exchange is a reasonable option for wear and osteolysis when the metal shell is well fixed. More promising long-term results are expected with the use of highly cross-linked polyethylene liners.

Polyethylene Liner and Femoral Head Exchange in Total Hip Arthroplasty: Factors Associated with Long-Term Success and Failure

BACKGROUND

Polyethylene (PE) liner and femoral head exchange is commonly used to treat periprosthetic osteolysis associated with PE wear after total hip arthroplasty (THA). The purpose of our study was to determine long-term implant survivorship, risk factors for mechanical failure, clinical outcomes, and complications following PE liner and head exchange.

METHODS

We identified 116 hips in 110 patients treated with PE liner and head exchange from 1993 to 2004. There were 64 women (58%) in the series, the mean age at revision surgery was 58 years, and the mean follow-up was 11 years (range, 2 to 23 years). Radiographic review determined the location and size of osteolytic defects before the revision surgery. Implant survivorship was determined using Kaplan-Meier survival analysis. Cox regression analysis was used to determine factors that were predictive of failure.

RESULTS

Implant survivorship free of repeat revision for any cause was 91% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 86% to 96%) at 5 years, 81% (95% CI = 74% to 90%) at 10 years, and 69% (95% CI = 55% to 84%) at 15 years. Reasons for repeat revision included aseptic acetabular loosening in 5 hips (4%) and subsequent wear of conventional PE with osteolysis in 5 hips (4%). No patient who underwent revision with highly cross-linked PE subsequently had a repeat revision due to wear. The absolute risk of acetabular component loosening was 23% for patients with osteolysis in 3 zones, 40% for those with osteolysis involving more than half the cup circumference, and 21% for those with osteolytic defects of >600 mm. The mean Harris hip score improved from 77 before the PE liner and head exchange to 87 after it (p < 0.001). The most common complication was dislocation, which occurred in 19 hips (16%).

CONCLUSIONS

PE liner and head exchange provides acceptable long-term implant survivorship with good clinical outcomes. Complications are not uncommon, and steps should be taken to mitigate hip instability. Acetabular revision may be considered when in situ components have a poor track record or are malpositioned, or when preoperative radiographs demonstrate large osteolytic defects threatening cup fixation. Use of highly cross-linked PE at revision was protective against subsequent PE wear and osteolysis, although this did not reach significance.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

How are those “lost to follow-up” patients really doing? A compliance comparison in arthroplasty patients

AIM: To determine whether there is a functional difference between patients who actively follow-up in the office (OFU) and those who are non-compliant with office follow-up visits (NFU).

METHODS: We reviewed a consecutive group of 588 patients, who had undergone total joint arthroplasty (TJA), for compliance and functional outcomes at one to two years post-operatively. All patients were given verbal instructions by the primary surgeon to return at one year for routine follow-up visits. Patients that were compliant with the instructions at one year were placed in the OFU cohort, while those who were non-compliant were placed in the NFU cohort. Survey mailings and telephone interviews were utilized to obtain complete follow-up for the cohort. A χ² test and an unpaired t test were used for comparison of baseline characteristics. Analysis of covariance was used to compare the mean clinical outcomes after controlling for confounding variables.

RESULTS: Complete follow-up data was collected on 554 of the 588 total patients (93%), with 75.5% of patients assigned to the OFU cohort and 24.5% assigned to the NFU cohort. We found significant differences between the cohorts with the OFU group having a higher mean age (P = 0.026) and a greater proportion of females (P = 0.041). No significant differences were found in either the SF12 or WOMAC scores at baseline or at 12 mo postoperative.

CONCLUSION: Patients who are compliant to routine follow-up visits at one to two years post-operation do not experience better patient reported outcomes than those that are non-compliant. Additionally, after TJA, older women are more likely to be compliant in following surgeon instructions with regard to follow-up office care.

Percutaneous acetabuloplasty: a cadaveric study

Periacetabular osteolysis is a common etiology of prosthesis failure in patients who undergo total hip arthroplasty. These lesions are treated by open and, more recently, percutaneous techniques. The purpose of this study was to determine the relevant surface anatomy and bony landmarks in establishing percutaneous access to periacetabular regions and identifying critical at-risk structures in establishing access. Percutaneous access to the periacetabular region was established superiorly, anteroinferiorly, and posteroinferiorly by using 5 L5-to-mid thigh fixed cadaver pelvises with latex-injected vessels using threaded guidewires. Dissection was completed to identify structures at risk, with the distance from the wires recorded to the nearest millimeter. C-arm position for the optimal visualization and placement of guidewires was recorded. Average distance from the pin and the at-risk structures ranged from 11.2 to 38.7 mm. All 3 approaches allowed for safe percutaneous access to the periacetabular regions without injuring significant anatomical structures. This study established safe starting points and orientation for guidewires and radiograph projections associated with percutaneous access to the periacetabular regions. The findings in this study will be useful for developing minimally invasive approaches to these regions for the treatment of osteolytic lesions of diverse etiology. However, a biomechanical evaluation of the impact of these bony channels on the strength of pelvis under physiological and unanticipated loading must be performed before this technique can be safely translated to clinical practice.

Computed tomography assessment of pelvic osteolysis and cup-lesion interface involvement with a press-fit porous-coated acetabular cup

We used computed tomography to investigate the 3-dimensional pattern of expansile osteolysis that occurs with a modular cementless acetabular component incorporating a central hole. We measured pelvic osteolysis volume and evaluated how much of the porous-coated surface area was involved with osteolytic defects. Among the 34 total hip arthroplasties we studied, osteolysis almost always originated from the dome hole and typically expanded inferiorly or superiorly without involving the anterior or posterior surfaces of the cup. Larger-volume lesions generally involved greater amounts of the cup surface area, but the cup-lesion interface involvement plateaued at 40% for radiographically stable cups without clinical complications. We hypothesize that the plateauing surface area involvement may explain the absence of cup loosening among these cases despite the presence of large osteolytic lesions.

Isolated acetabular liner exchange

During the past two decades, most total hip arthroplasties were performed with metal or ceramic heads on conventional polyethylene, an articulation associated with wear and limited life expectancy. Wear is associated with acetabular osteolysis. Isolated liner exchange has become a common surgical intervention when the acetabular component remains well-fixed. The purpose of isolated liner exchange is to prevent loosening of the components secondary to osteolysis and catastrophic mechanical failure caused by bearing wear-through. Treatment options for polyethylene wear include observation (in the asymptomatic hip), liner exchange, and more extensive revision procedures. Patients frequently present with asymptomatic but substantial polyethylene wear with or without associated osteolysis, the treatment of which is controversial. Other areas of debate include complete acetabular component removal to allow bone grafting and placement of an improved bearing surface, reuse of modular mechanisms, cementation into well-fixed shells, and whether to use periacetabular bone grafting.

Quality of reporting of orthopaedic diagnostic accuracy studies is suboptimal

Complete and accurate reporting of diagnostic research are essential to assess the validity of its results. To improve the quality of reporting of diagnostic accuracy studies, the Standards for Reporting of Diagnostic Accuracy (STARD) steering committee has developed a checklist of 25 items. We asked whether the quality of reporting of diagnostic accuracy studies published in three major orthopaedic journals (Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery British Volume, and Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery American Volume) would be similar across levels of study, journals, and years of publication, and would be similar to other subspecialty journals. We identified 37 articles from 2002-2004 diagnostic accuracy studies and applied the STARD checklist and scoring system. The scores ranged from 6.6 to 21.4 with a mean of 15 +/- 3.3. Only 38% of the articles (14 of 37) reported more than 2/3 of the items, and the majority failed to report nine specific items. The mean STARD scores were similar between the studies with different levels of evidence, across the three journals, and across the three years of publication. They were similar to scores for other subspecialty journals. The current standards of reporting of diagnostic accuracy studies in orthopaedic journals are suboptimal.

The role of acetabular and femoral osteotomies in reconstructive surgery of the hip: 2005 and beyond

Femoral and acetabular osteotomies have enduring and useful roles in the ongoing surgical treatment of patients with various hip conditions. The classic indication for intertrochanteric valgus osteotomy is to induce healing of femoral neck nonunions. Additional indications include posttraumatic deformity, limb-length inequality, certain cases of osteonecrosis, and adult sequelae of Legg-Calve-Perthes disease, and slipped capital femoral epiphysis. Isolated intertrochanteric osteotomy is only occasionally indicated for the treatment of arthritis secondary to dysplasia. Rotational osteotomies of the pelvis have overtaken the role once historically played by intertrochanteric osteotomy in the treatment of dysplasia-related hip anomalies. Ideal candidates have prearthritic, activity-related pain associated with radiographic dysplasia. It is imperative that the hip joint be congruous, free of fixed subluxation, and located in the natural acetabulum. Surgical treatment of associated acetabular labral tears and/or detachments and impingement lesions can be done at the same time through antecedent hip arthroscopy (same anesthetic) or open arthrotomy. The direction and magnitude of correction need to be customized to fit the nature of the dysplasia. A standard method of correction likely is to result in unwanted iatrogenic retroversion in some cases. Intertrochanteric osteotomy now is used as a complement to rotational osteotomy for the indications outlined above.