Fixation of revision implants is improved by a surgical technique to crack the sclerotic bone rim

Femoral neck system versus inverted cannulated cancellous screw for the treatment of femoral neck fractures in adults: a preliminary comparative study

BACKGROUND

The femoral neck system (FNS) may be a valid alternative for treating femoral neck fractures, but few studies have compared the outcomes between FNS and cannulated cancellous screws. This study aimed to compare the clinical efficacy and complications of FNS with those of inverted cannulated cancellous screws (ICCS) for the treatment of femoral neck fractures in adults.

METHODS

This retrospective study evaluated patients with femoral neck fractures who underwent FNS or ICCS internal fixation between June 2019 and January 2020. The operative time, intraoperative blood loss, number of fluoroscopies, length of surgical incision, length of hospital stay, time to fracture healing, and other indicators were compared between the two groups. The incidence of complications such as nonunion, avascular necrosis of the femoral head, loosening of the internal fixation, and shortening of the femoral neck during follow-up was also assessed in both groups.

RESULTS

Among the 92 patients included, 47 and 45 patients were categorized into the FNS and ICCS groups, respectively. Follow-up ranged from 14 to 24 months. There were no significant between-group differences in sex, age, side of the injured limb, and type of fracture and in operative time, intraoperative blood loss, incision length, and length of hospital stay (all P > 0.05). The incidence of complications such as fracture nonunion, avascular necrosis of the femoral head, and screw loosening was also comparable between the two groups. However, the number of fluoroscopies was significantly lower in the FNS group than in the ICCS group (P < 0.05). The fracture healing time was also significantly lower in the FNS group than in the ICCS group (P < 0.05). Furthermore, the femoral neck shortening and Harris hip score at the last follow-up were significantly better in the FNS group than in the ICCS group (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

FNS for femoral neck fractures improves hip functional recovery and reduces the femoral neck shortening rate and fluoroscopy exposure postoperatively. Thus, FNS can be an alternative to ICCS for the treatment of femoral neck fractures.

Comparison of dynamic hip screw and antirotation screw with cannulated screw in the treatment of transcervical collum femoris fractures

Objectives

This study aims to compare the results of internal fixation with dynamic hip screw (DHS)/antirotation screw and conventional cannulated screw (CS) for femoral neck fracture.

Patients and methods

This retrospective study included a total of 78 patients (57 males, 21 females) with collum femoris fractures treated with internal fixation between January 2015 and January 2019. Group 1 comprised 41 patients with a mean age of 45.7 years (range, 19 to 62 years) treated with DHSs/antirotation screws, while group 2 comprised 37 patients with a mean age of 41.9 years (range, 17 to 75 years) treated with CSs. The patients were evaluated for union, avascular necrosis (AVN), femoral neck shortness, operation time, duration of fluoroscopy exposure, and functional outcomes.

Results

Age, gender, and Garden classification stages were similar in both groups. No significant difference was found between the groups in respect of AVN and non-union rates. The non-union rate was 12.2% in group 1 and 21.6% in group 2 (p>0.05). The duration of fluoroscopy exposure was statistically significantly higher in group 2 (p=0.001) and the operation time was statistically significantly longer in group 1 (p=0.001). In group 2, femoral neck shortness stature was significantly higher (p=0.007). At the final follow-up examination, the Harris hip score was statistically significantly higher in group 1 (p=0.04).

Conclusion

Dynamic hip screw/antirotation screw was a more relevant treatment method for transcervical femoral neck fractures compared to CS with more favorable functional outcomes and less fluoroscopy exposure.

Dynamic hip system blade versus cannulated compression screw for the treatment of femoral neck fractures: A retrospective study

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to compare clinical outcomes of patients with femoral neck fractures treated with the dynamic hip system blade (DHS-BLADE) or cannulated compression screws.

METHODS

Eighty-six patients with femoral neck fractures were treated by closed reduction internal fixation with a DHS-BLADE (n = 42; 18 males and 24 females; mean age: 56.3 years (37-87)) or cannulated compression screws (n = 44; 20 males and 24 females; mean age: 53.8 years (26-83)) between March 2011 and August 2013. The groups were compared with Harris hip score, operation time, surgical blood loss, incision size, hospital stay, and related complications.

RESULTS

The average follow-up time was 27 months (range, 24-36 months). There was no significant difference for the operation time, incision size, hospital stay, and Harris hip score between the groups. Also, no statistically significant differences in the rates of nonunion (4.5% vs. 0) and avascular necrosis of the femoral head (9.1% vs. 7.1%) were observed. However, the screw group experienced significantly less surgical blood loss (32.4 ± 24.7 ml) than the blade group (87.2 ± 46.6 ml; P = 0.041). The incidence of femoral neck shortening above 10 mm in the screw group was significantly higher than that in the blade group (15.9% vs. 2.4%, P = 0.031). The blade group had a significantly lower incidence of screw migration than the screw group (4.8% vs. 22.7%, P = 0.016).

CONCLUSION

The DHS-BLADE and cannulated compression screws might be equally effective in terms of postoperative fracture union. However, the DHS-BLADE has advantages over cannulated compression screws for preventing femoral neck shortening, screw migration, and cut-out.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, Therapeutic study.

Do Bone Graft and Cracking of the Sclerotic Cavity Improve Fixation of Titanium and Hydroxyapatite-coated Revision Implants in an Animal Model?

BACKGROUND

We previously introduced a manual surgical technique that makes small perforations (cracks) through the sclerotic bone shell that typically forms during the process of aseptic loosening ("crack" revision technique). Perforating just the shell (without violating the proximal cortex) can maintain overall bone continuity while allowing marrow and vascular elements to access the implant surface. Because many revisions require bone graft to fill defects, we wanted to determine if bone graft could further increase implant fixation beyond what we have experimentally shown with the crack technique alone. Also, because both titanium (Ti6Al4V) and hydroxyapatite (HA) implant surfaces are used in revisions, we also wanted to determine their relative effectiveness in this model.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

We hypothesized that both (1) allografted plasma-sprayed Ti6Al4V; and (2) allografted plasma-sprayed HA-coated implants inserted with a crack revision technique have better fixation compared with a noncrack revision technique in each case.

METHODS

Under approval from our Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee, a female canine animal model was used to evaluate the uncemented revision technique (crack, noncrack) using paired contralateral implants while implant surface (Ti6Al4V, HA) was qualitatively compared between the two (unpaired) series. All groups received bone allograft tightly packed around the implant. This revision model includes a cylindrical implant pistoning 500 μm in a 0.75-mm gap, with polyethylene particles, for 8 weeks. This engenders a bone and tissue response representative of the metaphyseal cancellous region of an aseptically loosened component. At 8 weeks, the original implants were revised and followed for an additional 4 weeks. Mechanical fixation was assessed by load, stiffness, and energy to failure when loaded in axial pushout. Histomorphometry was used to determine the amount and location of bone and fibrous tissue in the grafted gap.

RESULTS

The grafted crack revision improved mechanical shear strength, stiffness, and energy to failure (for Ti6Al4V 27- to 69-fold increase and HA twofold increases). The histomorphometric analysis demonstrated primarily fibrous membrane ongrowth and in the gap for the allografted Ti6Al4V noncrack revisions. For allografted HA noncrack revisions, bone ongrowth at the implant surface was observed, but fibrous tissue also was present in the inner gap. Although both Ti6Al4V and HA surfaces showed improved fixation with grafted crack revision, and Ti6Al4V achieved the highest percent gain, HA demonstrated the strongest overall fixation.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this study suggest that novel osteoconductive or osteoinductive coatings and bone graft substitutes or tissue-engineered constructs may further improve bone-implant fixation with the crack revision technique but require evaluation in a rigorous model such as presented here.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

This experimental study provides data on which to base clinical trials aimed to improve fixation of revision implants. Given the multifactorial nature of complex human revisions, such a protocoled clinical study is required to determine the clinical applicability of this approach.

Tibial component fixation with a peri-apatite coating: evaluation by radiostereometric analysis in a canine total knee arthroplasty model

Cementless fixation for the tibial component in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) remains problematic. Peri-Apatite (PA), a solution-deposited hydroxyapatite, is under investigation as an option for improving the fixation of cementless tibial components. In this study, radiostereometric analysis was used to document implant migration in 48 dogs that underwent TKA with cementless, PA-coated, or cemented tibial components. Migration at 12 weeks was similar in the 2 groups. At 12 months, there was greater migration in the PA-coated group, but the difference between the 2 groups was below the threshold considered clinically significant. In this canine TKA model, cementless fixation with PA performed less well than did cemented fixation, but not to a degree that would make a clinical difference in the short term.

A biomechanical evaluation of proximal femoral nail antirotation with respect to helical blade position in femoral head: A cadaveric study

OBJECTIVE

Despite new developments in the management of osteoporotic fractures, complications like screw cutout are still found in the fixation of proximal femur fractures even with biomechanically proven better implants like proximal femoral nail antirotation (PFNA). The purpose of this cadaveric study was to investigate the biomechanical stability of this device in relation to two common positions (center-center and inferior-center) of the helical blade in the femoral head in unstable trochanteric fractures.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Eight pairs of human cadaveric femurs were used; in one group [center-center (C-C) group], the helical blade of PFNA was fixed randomly in central position both in anteroposterior and lateral view, whereas in the other group it was fixed in inferior one-third position in anteroposterior and in central position in lateral view [inferior-center (I-C) group]. Unstable intertrochanteric fracture was created and each specimen was loaded cyclically till load to failure

RESULTS

Angular and rotational displacements were significantly higher within the C-C group compared to the I-C group in both unloaded and loaded condition. Loading to failure was higher in the I-C group compared to the C-C group. No statistical significance was found for this parameter. Correlations between tip apex distance, cyclic loading which lead to femoral head displacement, and ultimate load to failure showed a significant positive relationship.

CONCLUSION

The I-C group was superior to the C-C group and provided better biomechanical stability for angular and rotational displacement. This study would be a stimulus for further experimental studies with larger number specimens and complex loading protocols at multicentres.

Side plate fixation vs. intramedullary nailing in an unstable medial femoral neck fracture model: A comparative biomechanical study

BACKGROUND

The objective of this study was to investigate primary stability of the proximal femoral nailing antirotation for the indication of unstable medial femoral neck fractures. The device was compared to the dynamic hip screw blade, which is a "gold standard" in the treatment of proximal femoral fractures.

METHODS

Six pairs of human cadaver femurs were tested in a cyclic loading model with loads up to 200 N, 400 N, 600 N, 800 N, and 1000 N, respectively. Iliotibial tract was simulated by a chain that applied forces on the greater trochanter during loading. In vitro combined axial and bending loads were applied. Angular displacements during loading were recorded in all directions, and loads to failure were recorded.

FINDINGS

For the cyclic loading test no statistically significant differences between the two groups could be detected. Specimens fixed with the dynamic hip screw blade showed higher displacements in the varus direction at 400 N and 600 N, in the external rotation at 200 N, 400 N and 600 N, and in the anterior direction at 400 N. Load to failure revealed no statistical difference between the two implants.

INTERPRETATION

The proximal femoral nailing antirotation achieves primary stability comparable to the dynamic hip screw blade. The proximal femoral nailing antirotation combines the biomechanical favorable concept of intramedullary fixation with a minimally invasive surgical technique, which theoretically may be advantageous in clinical use. Further biomechanical studies are required to clarify to what extent the results of the present study can be transferred to the clinical situation.

Effects of pulsed electromagnetic stimulation on patients undergoing hip revision prostheses: a randomized prospective double-blind study

In this prospective, randomized, double-blind study, the effect of Pulsed Electromagnetic Fields (PEMFs) was investigated in 30 subjects undergoing hip revision using the Wagner SL stem. The subjects were treated for 6 h/day up to 90 days after revision. Study end points were assessed clinically by the functional scale of Merle D'Aubigné and instrumentally by Dual-Energy X-ray Absorptiometry (DXA) at the Gruen zones. Subject improvement according to Merle D'Aubigné scale was higher (P < 0.05) in subjects undergoing active stimulation compared to placebo. In analyzing the DXA findings, we subtracted for each area the postoperative bone mineral density (BMD) values from those measured at 90 days and we considered all results above 3.5% as responders. There were no significant differences in the average BMD values at each Gruen zone between the two groups both postoperatively and at 90 days investigation. In Gruen zones 5 and 6, corresponding to the medial cortex, we observed six responders (40%) in both areas in the control group, while in the stimulated group we observed 14 (93%) and 10 (66%) responders, respectively (both P < 0.05). This study showed that PEMF treatment aids clinical recovery and bone stock restoration.

Crack revision improves fixation of uncemented HA-coated implants compared with reaming: an experiment in dogs

The crack procedure is a surgical technique for preparing the implant cavity at revision of loose joint replacement components. It disrupts the neocortical bone shell that typically forms around the cavity. Using an animal model, we compared the crack technique with reaming. Twenty micromotion implants were inserted bilaterally into the knees of 10 dogs according to our revision protocol, allowing formation of a standardized revision cavity (loose implant, fibrous tissue, and sclerotic bone rim). Eight weeks later we performed revision surgery. On the control side, in which the neocortex was removed, the cavity was reamed. On the intervention side, in which the neocortex was perforated but left in situ, the cavity was cracked. For revision we used non-motioning hydroxyapatite (HA)-coated, plasma-sprayed titanium implants. Observation after revision was 4 weeks. The implants revised by the crack technique had better mechanical fixation in all mechanical parameters by the push-out test. The crack revisions also provided more new bone formation around the implants compared with the reamed revisions but had no effect on new bone ongrowth. The data suggest using this bone-sparing technique may be superior to reaming in terms of achieving improved early implant fixation of uncemented HA-coated revision implants.

Fixation of hydroxyapatite-coated revision implants is improved by the surgical technique of cracking the sclerotic bone rim

Revision joint replacement has poorer outcomes that have been associated with poorer mechanical fixation. We investigate a new bone-sparing surgical technique that locally cracks the sclerotic bone rim formed during aseptic loosening. We inserted 16 hydroxyapatite-coated implants bilaterally in the distal femur of eight dogs, using a controlled weight-bearing experimental model that replicates important features of a typical revision setting. At 8 weeks, a control revision procedure and a crack revision procedure were performed on contralateral implants. The crack procedure used a splined tool to perform a systematic local perforation of the sclerotic bone rim of the revision cavity. After 4 weeks, the hydroxyapatite-coated implants were evaluated for mechanical fixation by a push-out test and for tissue distribution by histomorphometry. The cracking revision procedure resulted in significantly improved mechanical fixation, significantly more bone ongrowth and bone volume in the gap, and reduced fibrous tissue compared to the control revision procedure. The study demonstrates that the sclerotic bone rim prevents bone ingrowth and promotes fixation by fibrous tissue. The effect of the cracking technique may be due to improved access to the vascular compartment of the bone. The cracking technique is a simple surgical method that potentially can improve the fixation of revision implants in sclerotic regions important for obtaining the fixation critical for overall implant stability.

Quantification of cancellous bone-compaction due to DHS Blade insertion and influence upon cut-out resistance

BACKGROUND

Compaction of cancellous bone is believed to prevent cut-out. This in vitro study quantified the compaction in the femoral head due to insertion of a dynamic hip screw-blade with and without predrilling and investigated the resulting implant anchorage under cyclic loading.

METHODS

Eight pairs of human cadaveric femoral heads were instrumented with a dynamic hip screw-blade made of Polyetheretherketon. Pairwise instrumentation was performed either with or without predrilling the specimens. CT scanning was performed before and after implantation, to measure bone-compaction. Subsequently the implant was removed and a third scan was performed to analyze the relaxation of the bone structure. Commercial implants were reinserted and the specimens were cyclically loaded until onset of cut-out occurred. The bone-implant interface was monitored by means of fluoroscopic imaging throughout the experiment. Paired t-tests were performed to identify differences regarding compaction, relaxation and cycles to failure.

FINDINGS

Bone density in the surrounding of the implant increased about 30% for the non-predrilled and 20% for the predrilled group when inserting the implant. After implant removal the predrilled specimens fully relaxed; the non-predrilled group showed about 10% plastic deformation. No differences were found regarding cycles to failure (P=0.32).

INTERPRETATION

Significant bone-compaction due to blade insertion was verified. Even though compaction was lower when predrilling the specimens, mainly elastic deformation was present, which is believed to primarily enhance the implant anchorage. Cyclic loading tests confirmed this thesis. The importance of the implantation technique with regard to predrilling is therefore decreased.

Effect of topical alendronate treatment on fixation of implants inserted with bone compaction

Bone compaction has been shown to enhance the critical initial implant stability that is important for secure long-term fixation. We investigated whether topical bisphosphonate treatment improves fixation of implants inserted with bone compaction. Porous-coated titanium implants were inserted with bone compaction into the knees of eight dogs. In the right knee, topical bisphosphonate treatment was applied before bone compaction. Saline was used as a control in the left knee. The knees were observed for 4 weeks. We found an increase in total bone-to-implant contact and total bone density around the implants in the bisphosphonate-treated group. These were results of increased nonvital bone-to-implant contact and increased nonvital periimplant bone density. No change in biomechanical fixation was found. Studies with a longer followup are needed to investigate whether the preservative effect of alendronate on nonvital bone might enhance implant fixation by osteoconduction.