Computer-assisted navigation increases precision of component placement in total knee arthroplasty

Patella Strength Characteristics in Cemented vs Press-fit Implants: A Biomechanical Analysis of Initial Stability

Background

Patellar resurfacing is routinely performed during total knee arthroplasty to reduce pain associated with patellofemoral osteoarthritis. With 3-dimensional ingrowth materials readily available, the present study aimed to evaluate if cemented polyethylene (CP) patellar buttons conferred higher ultimate load to failure than press-fit metal-backed (PF) buttons in axial compression.

Material and methods

Ten matched cadaveric and 20 composite patellae were resurfaced and implanted with either a PF or CP button. Biomechanical testing using an MTS machine was performed to measure the force required to generate a periprosthetic patella fracture. Mean load to failure and load to failure per 1-mm patellar thickness were compared with a paired and independent samples Students’ t-test for the cadaveric and composite patellae, respectively.

Results

The average load to failure for the matched cadaveric patellae with PF implants was significantly lower than that for patellae with CP buttons (4082.05 N vs 5898.37 N, P = .045). The average load to failure for composite patella with PF implants was significantly higher than that for composite patellae with CP implants (6004.09 N vs 4551.40 N, P = .001). The mean load to failure per 1-mm patellar thickness was also significantly higher for composite patellae with PF implants (263.80 N/mm vs 200.37 N/mm, P = .001).

Conclusion

Cadaveric patellae with cemented implants had a significantly higher ultimate load to failure in axial compression than press-fit patella. However, this result was reversed in the composite model. Exploration of biological and composite model properties could provide further insight into patellar implant selection during total knee arthroplasty.

Robotic Total Knee Arthroplasty vs Conventional Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Nationwide Database Study

Background

As robot-assisted equipment is continuously being used in orthopaedic surgery, the past few decades have seen an increase in the usage of robotics for total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Thus, the purpose of the present study is to investigate the differences between robotic TKA and nonrobotic TKA on perioperative and postoperative complications and opioid consumption.

Methods

An administrative database was queried from 2010 to Q2 of 2017 for primary TKAs performed via robot-assisted surgery vs non-robot-assisted surgery. Systemic and joint complications and average morphine milligram equivalents were collected and compared with statistical analysis.

Results

Patients in the nonrobotic TKA cohort had higher levels of prosthetic revision at 1-year after discharge (P < .05) and higher levels of manipulation under anesthesia at 90 days and 1-year after discharge (P < .05). Furthermore, those in the nonrobotic TKA cohort had increased occurrences of deep vein thrombosis, altered mental status, pulmonary embolism, anemia, acute renal failure, cerebrovascular event, pneumonia, respiratory failure, and urinary tract infection during the inpatient hospital stay (all P < .05) and at 90 days after discharge (all P < .05). All of these categories remained statistically increased at the 90-days postdischarge date, except pneumonia and stroke. Patients in the nonrobotic TKA cohort had higher levels of average morphine milligram equivalents consumption at all time periods measured (P < .001).

Conclusions

In the present study, the use of robotics for TKA found lower revision rates, lower incidences of manipulation under anesthesia, decreased occurrence of systemic complications, and lower opiate consumption for postoperative pain management. Future studies should look to further examine the long-term outcomes for patients undergoing robot-assisted TKA.

Level of Evidence

Level III.

The accuracy and precision of computer assisted surgery in the assessment of frontal plane deviations of the lower extremity: a femoral fracture model

OBJECTIVES

Mechanical axis deviation of the lower extremity as a result of malreduction or malunion of fractures plays an important role in the development of arthritis. Therefore it is crucial to restore the limb alignment as accurate as possible. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the accuracy and precision of navigation in assessing isolated frontal plane (varus/valgus) deviations of the lower limb in a simulated fracture model of the femur.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Three fracture models with ten specimens in each were created in femoral synthetic composite bones to simulate a subtrochanteric (AO/OTA 31-A1), mid-diaphyseal (AO/OTA 32-A3), and supracondylar (AO/OTA 33-A1) femur fracture. Each specimen was mounted on a custom holding device and registered with the navigation system. Eight custom-made aluminum wedges of varying angles (5 degrees -26 degrees ) were used to create varus/valgus angulations at the fracture site. After wedge placement, the frontal plane deformity was recorded and registered by the navigation system. The means and standard deviations for each navigated wedge angle were calculated and compared to the actual wedge angle using a one sample t test. A single factor ANOVA test was subsequently performed to see if the differences between the navigated mean angles in each fracture group were statistically significant. The level of significance was defined as P < 0.05.

RESULTS

None of the navigated mean angles were found to be significantly different from the actual wedge angles (P = 0.05-1.00). More specifically, the differences between the navigated mean angles and the actual wedge angles ranged from 0 degrees to 0.7 degrees . Furthermore, the differences between the navigated mean angles in each angle group were found to be statistically insignificant (P = 0.53-0.99).

CONCLUSION

The high accuracy and precision of navigation systems in determining frontal plane deformities of long bones can make them an invaluable tool for the exact reduction and realignment of lower extremity fractures.

Patients' perspective on controversial issues in total knee arthroplasty

We investigated the level of patient knowledge and preferences over the currently controversial issues in TKA. One hundred patients who had decided to undergo TKA for advanced osteoarthritis were asked to complete a questionnaire inquiring their knowledge and preferences over three controversial issues: (1) computer assisted surgery (CAS), (2) minimal invasive surgery (MIS), and (3) ceramic femoral component. The patient preferences over the three issues were questioned again after they had been informed of advantages and disadvantages of each option using an explanatory document. Most (more than 75%) of the patients did not have sufficient knowledge and their knowledge was based on non-professional sources (more than 85%). Before the information was given, most (more than 80%) of the patients preferred a new option. After the information was provided, more patients preferred a standard option in the issues of CAS (60%) and MIS (88%). This study prompts health care providers to become more active in providing accurate information and to consider patients perspective in making decisions which will influence the benefits and risk of the patients.