1
|
Melcher C, Hussain I, Kirnaz S, Goldberg JL, Sommer F, Navarro-Ramirez R, Medary B, Härtl R. Use of a High-Fidelity Training Simulator for Minimally Invasive Lumbar Decompression Increases Working Knowledge and Technical Skills Among Orthopedic and Neurosurgical Trainees. Global Spine J 2023; 13:2182-2192. [PMID: 35225716 PMCID: PMC10538343 DOI: 10.1177/21925682221076044] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
STUDY DESIGN Prospective comparative study. OBJECTIVE To quantify the educational benefit to surgical trainees of using a high-fidelity simulator to perform minimally invasive (MIS) unilateral laminotomy for bilateral decompression (ULBD) for lumbar stenosis. METHODS Twelve orthopedic and neurologic surgery residents performed three MIS ULBD procedures over 2 weeks on a simulator guided by established AO Spine metrics. Video recording of each surgery was rated by three blinded, independent experts using a global rating scale. The learning curve was evaluated with attention to technical skills, skipped steps, occurrence of errors, and timing. A knowledge gap analysis evaluating participants' current vs desired ability was performed after each trial. RESULTS From trial 1 to 3, there was a decrease in average procedural time by 31.7 minutes. The cumulative number of skipped steps and surgical errors decreased from 25 to 6 and 24 to 6, respectively. Overall surgical proficiency improved as indicated by video rating of efficiency and smoothness of surgical maneuvers, most notably with knowledge and handling of instruments. The greatest changes were noted in junior rather than senior residents. Average knowledge gap analysis significantly decreased by 30% from the first to last trial (P = .001), signifying trainees performed closer to their desired technical goal. CONCLUSION Procedural metrics for minimally invasive ULBD in combination with a realistic surgical simulator can be used to improve the skills and confidence of trainees. Surgical simulation may offer an important educational complement to traditional methods of skill acquisition and should be explored further with other MIS techniques.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carolin Melcher
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University Hospital Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Ibrahim Hussain
- Department of Neurological Surgery Weill Cornell Brain and Spine Center, New York Presbyterian Hospital, New York, NY, USA
| | - Sertac Kirnaz
- Department of Neurological Surgery Weill Cornell Brain and Spine Center, New York Presbyterian Hospital, New York, NY, USA
| | - Jacob L. Goldberg
- Department of Neurological Surgery Weill Cornell Brain and Spine Center, New York Presbyterian Hospital, New York, NY, USA
| | - Fabian Sommer
- Department of Neurological Surgery Weill Cornell Brain and Spine Center, New York Presbyterian Hospital, New York, NY, USA
| | - Rodrigo Navarro-Ramirez
- Department of Neurological Surgery Weill Cornell Brain and Spine Center, New York Presbyterian Hospital, New York, NY, USA
| | - Branden Medary
- Department of Neurological Surgery Weill Cornell Brain and Spine Center, New York Presbyterian Hospital, New York, NY, USA
| | - Roger Härtl
- Department of Neurological Surgery Weill Cornell Brain and Spine Center, New York Presbyterian Hospital, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Epstein NE. Learning curves for minimally invasive spine surgeries: Are they worth it? Surg Neurol Int 2017; 8:61. [PMID: 28540127 PMCID: PMC5421250 DOI: 10.4103/sni.sni_39_17] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/25/2017] [Accepted: 01/26/2017] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Minimally invasive surgery (MIS) spine procedures were developed to limit operative time, the extent of dissection, and reduce perioperative morbidity. Here, we asked what are the “learning curves” for these MIS spine procedures? Methods: We reviewed studies in the literature that discussed the “learning curves” attributed to performing different MIS spine surgical procedures. Of interest, the majority were single-surgeon series. Results: Very few articles assessed the learning curves for different MIS spine procedures. One study reported no learning curve for open vs. MIS discectomy/laminotomy. Another study indicated that 20–30 cases were required for a surgeon to become proficient in performing a variety of MIS spine fusions [e.g., cervical MIS fusions, MIS anterior lumbar interbody fusions (ALIF), MIS transforaminal lumbar interbody fusions (TLIF), and MIS pedicle/screw placement in the thoracic/lumbar spine]. Several other studies specifically cited that, to become proficient in the performance of TLIF, surgeons had to have performed between 10, to 32, to 40, to 44 such cases. Conclusions: There is a very limited literature available that focuses on the “learning curves” associated with the performance of different types of MIS spine procedures. The number of cases required to satisfy the “learning curves” for different operations varied from 0 for MIS vs. open discectomy/laminotomy, to 20-30 for a variety of cervical-thoracic-lumbar procedures, and up to 44 cases for TLIF. Shouldn’t we ask whether better oversight measures and/or mentoring programs could limit the morbidity/AE occurring during these “learning curves” in the future?
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nancy E Epstein
- Department of Neuroscience, Winthrop Neuroscience, Winthrop University Hospital, Mineola, New York, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Shriver MF, Xie JJ, Tye EY, Rosenbaum BP, Kshettry VR, Benzel EC, Mroz TE. Lumbar microdiscectomy complication rates: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Neurosurg Focus 2016; 39:E6. [PMID: 26424346 DOI: 10.3171/2015.7.focus15281] [Citation(s) in RCA: 82] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
OBJECT Lumbar microdiscectomy and its various minimally invasive surgical techniques are seeing increasing popularity, but a systematic review of their associated complications has yet to be performed. The authors sought to identify all prospective clinical studies reporting complications associated with lumbar open microdiscectomy, microendoscopic discectomy (MED), and percutaneous microdiscectomy. METHODS The authors conducted MEDLINE, Scopus, Web of Science, and Embase database searches for randomized controlled trials and prospective cohort studies reporting complications associated with open, microendoscopic, or percutaneous lumbar microdiscectomy. Studies with fewer than 10 patients and published before 1990 were excluded. Overall and interstudy median complication rates were calculated for each surgical technique. The authors also performed a meta-analysis of the reported complications to assess statistical significance across the various surgical techniques. RESULTS Of 9504 articles retrieved from the databases, 42 met inclusion criteria. Most studies screened were retrospective case series, limiting the number of studies that could be included. A total of 9 complication types were identified in the included studies, and these were analyzed across each of the surgical techniques. The rates of any complication across the included studies were 12.5%, 13.3%, and 10.8% for open, MED, and percutaneous microdiscectomy, respectively. New or worsening neurological deficit arose in 1.3%, 3.0%, and 1.6% of patients, while direct nerve root injury occurred at rates of 2.6%, 0.9%, and 1.1%, respectively. Hematoma was reported at rates of 0.5%, 1.2%, and 0.6%, respectively. Wound complications (infection, dehiscence, orseroma) occurred at rates of 2.1%, 1.2%, and 0.5%, respectively. The rates of recurrent disc complications were 4.4%, 3.1%, and 3.9%, while reoperation was indicated in 7.1%, 3.7%, and 10.2% of operations, respectively. Meta-analysis calculations revealed a statistically significant higher rate of intraoperative nerve root injury following percutaneous procedures relative to MED. No other significant differences were found. CONCLUSIONS This review highlights complication rates among various microdiscectomy techniques, which likely reflect real-world practice and conceptualization of complications among physicians. This investigation sets the framework for further discussions regarding microdiscectomy options and their associated complications during the informed consent process.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Jack J Xie
- Department of Physiology and Biophysics, Case Western Reserve University
| | | | | | | | | | - Thomas E Mroz
- Center for Spine Health, and.,Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Franke J, Manson N, Buzek D, Kosmala A, Hubbe U, Rosenberg W, Pereira P, Assietti R, Martens F, Lam K, Barbanti Brodano G, Durny P, Lidar Z, Scheufler K, Senker W. MASTERS-D Study: A Prospective, Multicenter, Pragmatic, Observational, Data-Monitored Trial of Minimally Invasive Fusion to Treat Degenerative Lumbar Disorders, One-Year Follow-Up. Cureus 2016; 8:e640. [PMID: 27433419 PMCID: PMC4945329 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.640] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
The objective of the study is to assess effectiveness and safety of minimally invasive lumbar interbody fusion (MILIF) for degenerative lumbar disorders (DLD) in daily surgical practice and follow up with patients for one year after surgery. A prospective, multicenter, pragmatic, monitored, international outcome study in patients with DLD causing back/leg pain was conducted (19 centers). Two hundred fifty-two patients received standard of care available in the centers. Patients were included if they were aged >18 years, required one- or two-level lumbar fusion for DLD, and met the criteria for approved device indications. Primary endpoints: time to first ambulation (TFA) and time to surgery recovery (TSR). Secondary endpoints: patient-reported outcomes (PROs)--back and leg pain (visual analog scale), disability (Oswestry Disability Index (ODI)), health status (EQ-5D), fusion rates, reoperation rates, change in pain medication, rehabilitation, return to work, patient satisfaction, and adverse events (AEs). Experienced surgeons (≥30 surgeries pre-study) treated patients with DLD by one- or two-level MILIF and patients were evaluated for one year (NCT01143324). At one year, 92% (233/252) of patients remained in the study. Primary outcomes: TFA, 1.3 ±0.5 days and TSR, 3.2 ±2.0 days. Secondary outcomes: Most patients (83.3%) received one level MILIF; one (two-level) MILIF mean surgery duration, 128 (182) min; fluoroscopy time, 115 (154) sec; blood loss, 164 (233) mL; at one year statistically significant (P<.0001) and clinically meaningful changes from baseline were reported in all PROs--reduced back pain (2.9 ±2.5 vs. 6.2 ±2.3 at intake), reduced leg pain (2.2 ±2.6 vs. 5.9 ±2.8), and ODI (22.4% ± 18.6 vs. 45.3% ± 15.3), as well as health-related quality of life (EQ-5D index: 0.71 ±0.28 vs. 0.34 ±0.32). More of the professional workers were working at one year than those prior to surgery (70.3% vs. 55.2%). Three AEs and one serious AE were considered procedure-related; there were no deep site infections or deaths. This is the first study evaluating MILIF for treatment of DLD in daily clinical practice. Clinically significant improvements were observed in all endpoints. Short-term post-surgery improvements (four weeks) were maintained through one year with minimal complications. Our results suggest that MILIF has good-to-excellent outcomes for the treatment of DLD in a broad patient population under different clinical conditions and healthcare delivery systems.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | - Ulrich Hubbe
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Germany, Neurosurgical Clinic, Medical Center, University of Freiburg, Germany
| | | | - Paulo Pereira
- Faculty of Medicine of the University of Porto ; Centro Hospitalar São João
| | | | | | - Khai Lam
- Spine surgery, London Bridge Hospital, London, UK
| | | | - Peter Durny
- Neurosurgery, Ustredna vojenska nemocnica SNP, Ruzomberok, Slovakia
| | - Zvi Lidar
- Neurosurgery, The Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Lombardi G, Grasso D, Berjano P, Banfi G, Lamartina C. Is Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery Also Minimally Pro-Inflammatory? Muscular Markers, Inflammatory Parameters and Cytokines to Quantify the Operative Invasiveness Assessment in Spine Fusion. EUR J INFLAMM 2014. [DOI: 10.1177/1721727x1401200203] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/04/2023] Open
Abstract
Over the last decades, minimally invasive surgery (MIS) techniques entered in the surgical routine due to their major advantage in reducing the unnecessary exposure of tissue and, thus, the trauma. Even in the context of orthopedics and spine surgery these practices have been widely developed and applied. Besides the clinical outcome of the patients, few studies have quantitatively assessed the traumatic and inflammatory effects of a specific surgical technique. Indeed, currently, a universally accepted biological outcome measure, such as a panel of biochemical markers, to define the success of MIS approach is still lacking. We reviewed the literature to collect the published data regarding the quantitative analysis of trauma induced by either conventional or minimally invasive surgery with the aim of highlighting evidence useful to guide future studies. Previous publications show some evidence in support of the hypothesis that MIS approaches are less traumatic, and possibly less pro-inflammatory, than conventional ones. Creatin kinase (as a marker of muscular damage) and C-reactive protein (as a marker of systemic inflammation) seem to reproducibly follow different trends in minimally invasive surgery compared to conventional procedures. Moreover, cytokines, such as interleukin (IL)-6 and IL-10 are also promising markers in this context.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- G. Lombardi
- Laboratory of Experimental Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, I.R.C.C.S. Istituto Ortopedico Galeazzi, Milan, Italy
| | - D. Grasso
- Laboratory of Experimental Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, I.R.C.C.S. Istituto Ortopedico Galeazzi, Milan, Italy
| | - P. Berjano
- O.U. Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Spine Surgery IV, I.R.C.C.S. Istituto Ortopedico Galeazzi, Milan, Italy
| | - G. Banfi
- Laboratory of Experimental Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, I.R.C.C.S. Istituto Ortopedico Galeazzi, Milan, Italy
- Department of Biomedical Sciences for Health, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - C. Lamartina
- O.U. Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Spine Surgery II, I.R.C.C.S. Istituto Ortopedico Galeazzi, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Jim B, Steffen T, Moir J, Roughley P, Haglund L. Development of an intact intervertebral disc organ culture system in which degeneration can be induced as a prelude to studying repair potential. EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL : OFFICIAL PUBLICATION OF THE EUROPEAN SPINE SOCIETY, THE EUROPEAN SPINAL DEFORMITY SOCIETY, AND THE EUROPEAN SECTION OF THE CERVICAL SPINE RESEARCH SOCIETY 2011; 20:1244-54. [PMID: 21336509 DOI: 10.1007/s00586-011-1721-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 48] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/27/2010] [Revised: 12/28/2010] [Accepted: 02/06/2011] [Indexed: 01/08/2023]
Abstract
The present work describes a novel bovine disc organ culture system with long-term maintenance of cell viability, in which degenerative changes can be induced as a prelude to studying repair. Discs were isolated with three different techniques: without endplates (NEP), with bony endplates (BEP) and with intact cartilage endplates (CEP). Swelling, deformation, and cell viability were evaluated in unloaded cultures. Degeneration was induced by a single trypsin injection into the center of the disc and the effect on cell viability and matrix degradation was followed. Trypsin-treated discs were exposed to TGFβ to evaluate the potential to study repair in this system. NEP isolated discs showed >75% maintained cell viability for up to 10 days but were severely deformed, BEP discs on the other hand maintained morphology but failed to retain cell viability having only 27% viable cells after 10 days. In CEP discs, both cell viability and morphology were maintained for at least 4 weeks where >75% of the cells were still viable. To mimic proteoglycan loss during disc degeneration, a single trypsin injection was administered to the center of the disc. This resulted in 60% loss of aggrecan, after 7 days, without affecting cell viability. When TGFβ was injected to validate that the system can be used to study a repair response following injection of a bio-active substance, proteoglycan synthesis nearly doubled compared to baseline synthesis. Trypsin-treated bovine CEP discs therefore provide a model system for studying repair of the degenerate disc, as morphology, cell viability and responsiveness to bio-active substances were maintained.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bernice Jim
- Orthopaedic Research Laboratory, McGill University, 687 Pine Avenue West, Room L4.70, Montreal, QC H3A 1A1, Canada
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|