Late complications of adult idiopathic scoliosis primary fusions to L4 and above: the effect of age and distal fusion level

Clinical and radiographic outcomes following correction of idiopathic scoliosis in adolescence vs young adulthood

PURPOSE

The natural history of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) has been well documented, but the impact of age at the time of surgical correction is relatively understudied. In this study, we matched patients undergoing surgical correction of adult idiopathic scoliosis (AdIS) with a cohort of AIS patients to compare: (1) coronal and sagittal radiographic correction, (2) operative variables, and (3) postoperative complications.

METHODS

A single-institution scoliosis registry was queried for patients undergoing idiopathic scoliosis surgery from 2000-2017.

INCLUSION CRITERIA

patients with idiopathic scoliosis, no previous spine surgery, and 2-year follow-up. AdIS patients were matched 1:2 with AIS patients based on Lenke classification and curve characteristics. Independent sample t-test and Chi-square test was used to analyze the data.

RESULTS

31 adults underwent surgical correction of idiopathic scoliosis and were matched with 62 adolescents. Mean age of adults was 26.2 ± 11.05, mean BMI was 25.6 ± 6.0, and 22 (71.0%) were female. Mean age of adolescents was 14.2 ± 1.8, mean BMI was 22.7 ± 5.7, and 41(66.7%) were female. AdIS had significantly less postoperative major Cobb correction (63.9% vs 71.3%, p = 0.006) and final major Cobb correction (60.6% vs 67.9%, p = 0.025). AdIS also had significantly greater postoperative T1PA (11.8 vs 5.8, p = 0.002). AdIS had longer operative times (p = 0.003), higher amounts of pRBCs transfused (p = 0.005), longer LOS (p = 0.016), more ICU requirement (p = 0.013), higher overall complications (p < 0.001), higher rate of pseudarthrosis (p = 0.026), and more neurologic complications (p = 0.013).

CONCLUSION

Adult patients undergoing surgical correction of idiopathic scoliosis had significantly worse postoperative coronal and sagittal alignment when compared with adolescent patients. Adult patients also had higher rates of complications, longer operative times, and longer hospital stays.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

Influence of Lateral Translation of Lowest Instrumented Vertebra on L4 Tilt and Coronal Balance for Thoracolumbar and Lumbar Curves in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis

This study aimed to evaluate the lowest instrumented vertebra translation (LIV-T) in the surgical treatment of thoracolumbar/lumbar adolescent idiopathic scoliosis and to analyze the radiographic parameters in relation to LIV-T and L4 tilt and global coronal balance. A total of 62 patients underwent posterior spinal fusion (PSF, n = 32) or anterior spinal fusion (ASF, n = 30) and were followed up for a minimum of 2 years. The mean preoperative LIV-T was significantly larger in the ASF group than the PSF (p < 0.01), while the final LIV-T was equivalent. LIV-T at the final follow-up was significantly correlated with L4 tilt and the global coronal balance (r = 0.69, p < 0.01, r = 0.38, p < 0.01, respectively). Receiver-operating characteristic analysis for good outcomes, with L4 tilt <8° and coronal balance <15 mm at the final follow-up, calculated the cutoff value of the final LIV-T as 12 mm. The cutoff value of preoperative LIV-T that would result in the LIV-T of ≤12 mm at the final follow-up was 32 mm in PSF, although no significant cutoff value was calculated in ASF. ASF can centralize the LIV better than PSF with a shorter segment fusion, and could be useful in obtaining a good curve correction and global balance without fixation to L4 in cases with large preoperative LIV-T.

The analysis of progression of disc degeneration in distal unfused segments and evaluation of long-term functional outcome in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis patients undergoing long-segment instrumented fusion

PURPOSE

To analyse the progression of disc degeneration in distal unfused lumbar segments in post-operative Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis (AIS) patients; and to evaluate pre-operative and post-operative radiological parameters associated with progressive disc degeneration.

METHODS

A retrospective study of patients, who underwent surgery for AIS between 2006 and 2013 at a tertiary-care spine hospital, was conducted. Only patients aged between 11 and 18 years, who underwent deformity correction surgery with pedicle screw-only constructs, minimum of 6.5 year follow-up, and complete radiological data, and were included. On plain radiographs, coronal cobb's angle (CCA), apical translation, lower instrumented vertebra tilt (LIV tilt), LIV-Sacral angle, and sagittal spinal and pelvic parameters were measured. Disc degeneration was assessed on Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) using Pfirrmann's grading. Total endplate score (TEPS) and facet degeneration (by Fujiwara's grading) were also measured. Based on the difference in progression of disc degeneration, patients were classified as Pfirrmann's grade static (PGS) and Pfirrmann's grade progressive (PGP) groups. Comparison of all pre- and post-operative parameters was made between PGS and PGP groups, and statistically analyzed. Functional evaluation was performed using SRS-22 score.

RESULTS

A total of 58 patients were finally included. The mean follow-up was 9.1 years. 43 (74.1%) and 15 (25.9%) patients were classified under PGS and PGP groups, respectively. Among the15 patients in PGP group, selected LIV was L4 in 8, L3 in 3, L1 in 3, and L2 in 1. Among them, 11 patients (73.3%) progressed from grade 1 to grade 2. In the remaining 4 (26.6%), Pfirrmann's grade progressed to ≥ 3. The progression of disc degeneration did not correlate with age or sex distribution (p = 0.3), pre-operative and post-operative TEP scores (p = 032), pre-operative disc or facet degeneration (p = 0.52), number of unfused spinal segments (p = 0.56), pre-operative or post-operative coronal (p = 0.42), or sagittal spinal (p = 0.27) or pelvic parameters (p = 0.14). The final functional outcome (SRS-22) was not significantly different between PGS and PGP groups (p = 0.67).

CONCLUSION

74% of AIS patients demonstrated no signs of progressive disc degeneration at an average follow-up of 9.1 years. 26% (15/58) of AIS patients demonstrated progressive disc degeneration, among whom, degeneration progressed by only 1 Pfirrmann's grade in 74% (11/15). In the remaining four patients, disc degeneration progressed to Pfirrmann's grades 3 or greater. There was no correlation between higher grades of disc degeneration and lower instrumented vertebra (LIV) or functional outcomes scores (SRS-22).

The Effect of Smoking on the Fusion Rate of Spinal Fusion Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

OBJECTIVE

To conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis comparing the fusion rate after spinal fusion surgery between smokers and nonsmokers.

METHODS

We searched PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science electronic databases through March 10, 2021 for cohort and case-control studies assessing the effect of smoking on the fusion rate of spinal fusion surgery. Two researchers independently screened the literature and extracted data according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Statistical analysis was performed using RevMan, version 5.4.

RESULTS

A total of 26 studies, including 4 case-control studies and 22 cohort studies, with 4409 patients, were included in the present meta-analysis. Follow-up was at least 6 months. Overall, the pooled results demonstrated that the fusion rate of smokers after spinal fusion was significantly lower than that of nonsmokers. The odds ratio (OR) was 0.55 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.45-0.67, P < 0.0001). Subgroup analyses by fusion level showed the adverse effect of smoking on the fusion rate at single level (OR 0.61, 95% CI 0.41-0.91, P = 0.02) was more significant than that of multiple levels (OR 0.55, 95% CI 0.38-0.80, P = 0.0010). Subgroup analysis according to the type of bone graft revealed an apparent association between smoking and fusion rate in the autograft subgroup (OR 0.47, 95% CI 0.33-0.66, P < 0.0001) but not in the allograft subgroup (OR 0.69, 95% CI 0.47-1.01, P = 0.06).

CONCLUSIONS

The fusion rate of smokers is significantly lower than that of nonsmokers in spinal fusion surgery. Smokers should be encouraged to quit smoking to improve the outcome of spinal fusion surgery.

Selection of Lowest Instrumented Vertebra Using Fulcrum Bending Radiographs Achieved Shorter Fusion Safely Compared With the Last "Substantially" Touching Vertebra in Lenke Type 1A and 2A Curves

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective study with prospective radiographic data collection.

OBJECTIVE

To compare fusion level determination criteria using the fulcrum bending radiograph (FBR) and the last substantially touched vertebra (STV) as the lowest instrumented vertebra (LIV) in the radiographic outcomes of correction surgery for Lenke 1A and 2A scoliosis patients with a minimum of 2-year follow-up.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

The STV has been proposed as the LIV in Lenke 1A and 2A curves to avoid postoperative distal adding-on. However, the influence of the inherent flexibility of the curves on selecting the LIV in relation to the STV is not known.

METHODS

A total of 65 consecutive Lenke 1A and 2A patients who underwent posterior selective thoracic fusion were included in this study with a minimum of 2-year follow-up. LIV determination was compared with the FBR and STV methods. The curve correction, trunk shift, radiographic shoulder height, list, and the incidence of distal adding-on were documented.

RESULTS

Mean preoperative, postoperative, and final follow-up standing coronal Cobb angles of primary curves were 59.37°, 15.58°, and 16.62° respectively. Using the FBR to determine the LIV, STV was selected in 16 patients (25%), STV-1 in 34 (52%), STV-2 in 11 (17%), and STV-3 in three (5%). Fusion level difference between using FBR and STV method was statistically significantly larger (P = 0.019) in patients with more than 70% fulcrum flexibility (mean: 1.18 levels, range: 0-3 levels) than those with less than or equal to 70% flexibility (mean: 0.70 level, range: -1 to 3 levels). Mean fulcrum flexibility was 73.9% in patients who achieved a shorter fusion by FBR method and 66.3% in patients who did not achieve a shorter fusion. Adding-on was observed in three patients (4.6%).

CONCLUSION

By considering the curve flexibility, LIV determination using FBR method achieved a shorter fusion than STV method in over 70% of Lenke 1A and 2A patients, while being safe and effective at 2-year follow-up.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

3.

Revision Risk After Primary Adult Spinal Deformity Surgery: A Nationwide Study With Two-Year Follow-up

STUDY DESIGN

Cohort study.

OBJECTIVES

To report the two-year revision risk following primary adult spinal deformity (ASD) surgery, describe reasons for revisions, and assess risk factors for revision surgery.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Revision risk following primary ASD surgery has been reported to vary between 7% and 26%, but with loss to follow-up as a considerable challenge.

METHODS

Patients ≥18 years of age undergoing primary instrumented surgery for ASD in Denmark during 2006-2014 were identified by procedure and diagnosis codes in the Danish National Patient Registry (DNPR). Complete two-year follow-up on revision surgery for each patient was achieved. Medical records were reviewed to determine reasons for revisions. Overall comorbidity was summarized using the Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) based on DNPR data; low comorbidity (CCI 0); medium comorbidity (CCI 1-2); and high comorbidity (CCI ≥3). Risk factors for revision were assessed in a Cox regression model.

RESULTS

A total of 553 patients were identified. Of these, 19.9% were revised within the two-year follow-up and 7.2% of patients were revised more than once. Median time to revision was 308 days (interquartile range 105-508). The most common reason for revision was implant failure (38.2%) followed by infection (11.8%). Increased age (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.13, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.01-1.26, per 10 years increment) and high comorbidity burden (HR = 2.10, 95% CI 1.16-3.79) were associated with increased revision risk. Risk of revision increased from 2006 to 2014; hence, year of primary surgery (with 2006 as reference) was associated with increased revision risk (HR = 1.09, 95% CI 1.01-1.18).

CONCLUSIONS

The revision risk within 2 years after primary ASD surgery was 19.9% nationwide in Denmark, and implant failure was the most common reason for revision. Increased comorbidity and age were separately associated with increased risk of revision.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level II.

Alcoholism as a predictor for pseudarthrosis in primary spine fusion: An analysis of risk factors and 30-day outcomes for 52,402 patients from 2005 to 2013

Introduction

This study assessed the incidence and risk factors for pseudarthrosis among primary spine fusion patients.

Methods

Retrospective review of ACS-NSQIP (2005-2013). Differences in comorbidities between spine fusion patients with and without pseudarthrosis (Pseud, N-Pseud) were assessed using chi-squared tests and Independent Samples t-tests. Binary logistic regression assessed patient-related and procedure-related predictors for pseudarthrosis.

Results

52,402 patients (57yrs, 53%F, 0.4% w/pseudarthrosis). Alcohol consumption (OR:2.6[1.2-5.7]) and prior history of surgical revision (OR:1.6[1.4-1.8]) were risk factors for pseudarthrosis operation. Pseud patients at higher risk for deep incisional SSI (at 30-days:OR:6.6[2.0-21.8]). Pseud patients had more perioperative complications (avg:0.24 ± 0.43v0.18 ± 0.39,p=0.026).

Conclusions

Alcoholism and surgical revision are major risk factors for pseudarthrosis in patients undergoing spine fusion.

Long Fusion Arthrodesis Stopping at L5 for Adult Scoliosis: Fate of L5-S1 Disk and Risk Factors for Subsequent Disk Degeneration

STUDY DESIGN

This is retrospective study.

OBJECTIVE

Our purpose is to examine the state of the L5-S1 disk after long fusion arthrodesis stopping at L5 in adult scoliosis, and to identify the risk factors for disk degeneration.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

The long fusion arthrodesis surgery for adult scoliosis has shown to have good clinical results. However, there is still some controversy with reference to the potential caudal extents of the fusion, that is, L5 or S1. One of the most common problems related to the L5 fusion is whether subsequent L5-S1 disk degenerations occurs because of stress concentration. In this study, 1.5-T MRI was used to evaluate the L5-S1 disk degeneration according to Pfirrmann classification.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In total, 43 patients with adult scoliosis after posterior long fusions arthrodesis surgery were reviewed retrospectively with the average follow-up period of 4.17±1.55 years (range, 2-9 y). The 1.5 T MRI and standing long x-ray were performed preoperatively and at last follow-up visit. Clinical outcomes were evaluated according to Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) scores and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI).

RESULTS

Subsequent L5-S1 disk degeneration was observed in 33 patients (51.56%). Preoperative average Pfirrmann grade was 1.98±0.58, whereas during last follow-up average Pfirrmann grade was 2.63±0.83 (P<0.001). Preoperative Pfirrmann grade in patients with subsequent disk degeneration was 1.94±0.66, and in patients without subsequent disk degeneration was 2.06±0.51 (P=0.278). Greater ODI showed in patients with subsequent degeneration (P=0.008). Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that long follow-up period, heavy labor, and preoperative imbalance were the risk factors.

CONCLUSIONS

Subsequent L5-S1 disk degeneration was common after long fusions arthrodesis was stopped at L5. The recovery of neurological status was similar in patients with or without subsequent L5-S1 disk degeneration, whereas patients with subsequent degeneration complained more about low back pain. Patients with long follow-up period, heavy labor, and preoperative imbalance were more likely to suffer subsequent L5-S1 disk degeneration.

Pseudarthrosis in adult and pediatric spinal deformity surgery: a systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis of incidence, characteristics, and risk factors

We conducted a systematic review with meta-analysis and qualitative synthesis. This study aims to characterize pseudarthrosis after long-segment fusion in spinal deformity by identifying incidence rates by etiology, risk factors for its development, and common features. Pseudarthrosis can be a painful and debilitating complication of spinal fusion that may require reoperation. It is poorly characterized in the setting of spinal deformity. The MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases were searched for clinical research including spinal deformity patients treated with long-segment fusions reporting pseudarthrosis as a complication. Meta-analysis was performed on etiologic subsets of the studies to calculate incidence rates for pseudarthrosis. Qualitative synthesis was performed to identify characteristics of and risk factors for pseudarthrosis. The review found 162 articles reporting outcomes for 16,938 patients which met inclusion criteria. In general, the included studies were of medium to low quality according to recommended reporting standards and study design. Meta-analysis calculated an incidence of 1.4% (95% CI 0.9-1.8%) for pseudarthrosis in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis, 2.2% (95% CI 1.3-3.2%) in neuromuscular scoliosis, and 6.3% (95% CI 4.3-8.2%) in adult spinal deformity. Risk factors for pseudarthrosis include age over 55, construct length greater than 12 segments, smoking, thoracolumbar kyphosis greater than 20°, and fusion to the sacrum. Choice of graft material, pre-operative coronal alignment, post-operative analgesics, and sex have no significant impact on fusion rates. Older patients with greater deformity requiring more extensive instrumentation are at higher risk for pseudarthrosis. Overall incidence of pseudarthrosis requiring reoperation is low in adult populations and very low in adolescent populations.

Perioperative complications after surgical treatment in degenerative adult de novo scoliosis

Background

Degenerative adult de novo (DAD) scoliosis appears characteristically in the sixth or seventh decade with symptoms of severe back pain and radiculopathy or spinal claudication. The aim of this study was to enhance the knowledge of perioperative complications and detect possible risk factors in this selective DAD scoliosis surgery.

Methods

This retrospective study included only patients with DAD scoliosis undergone correction spondylodesis with previous failure of conservative treatment. Excluded were patients with other types of scoliosis and previous fusion surgeries. Patient epidemiological data, medical comorbidities and treatments were included. Intraoperative data and perioperative complications were documented. Analyses regarding early, late and no complications were undertaken.

Results

A total of 92 patients with a mean age of 67.29 ± 7.93 years and clinical follow-up visits of minimum 12 months were included. On average, 5.26 ± 2.24 segments were fused. Early complications (e.g. wound healing defects, paresis, screw loosing) occurred in 23 patients and often required a re-operation. Cardiac arrhythmias, pacemaker and coumarin derivative therapies were associated with increased perioperative complications. The transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion technique was associated with early complications. Adjacent segment failure occurred in 36% and was the major late complication. Twenty patients did not have any complications in the minimum follow-up.

Conclusions

This study analysed a selective DAD scoliosis collective and its’ surgical treatment outcomes. It identified numerous perioperative complications (adjacent segment failure, postoperative paresis and epidural hematoma) and multiple possible predisposing risk factors (e.g. operative techniques and anti-coagulation therapies). This here gained information raises awareness in preoperative patient selection and preparation. Further studies in DAD scoliosis and a risk-adjusted patient selection/preparation are needed to improve treatment quality and outcomes.

Analysing the change of sagittal balance in patients with Lenke 5 idiopathic scoliosis

Objective

The aim of this study was to evaluate preoperative and postoperative spinopelvic parameters and the influence of lowest instrumented vertebrae on sagittal parameters in Lenke 5 Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis (AIS) patients.

Methods

A total of 42 patients (37 females, 5 males; mean age: 16.71 ± 3.46 years) were included in the study. Preoperative and postoperative last follow up lumbar lordosis (LL), thoracic kyphosis (TK), pelvic tilt (PT), pelvic incidence (PI) and sacral slope (SS) angles measured. By stopped fusion in L3, L4 or L5 we divided the group into three parts.

Results

Mean follow-up was 43 months. Preoperatively, the mean TK and LL were 36.8° and 55.3°. At the last follow up, the mean TK and LL were 27.1° and 49.0° degrees, respectively. Preoperatively, the mean PI, PT and SS were 53.3°, 16.1° and 37.4° degrees. At the last follow up, the mean PI, PT and SS were 52.7°, 19.9° and 33.0° respectively. Significant differences were observed for SS (p = 0.003), TK (p = 0.004), LL (p = 0.012) and PT (p = 0.013) postoperatively for all patients. According the L3 and L4 groups there is significant difference in SS, LL (p = 0.013) and PT (p = 0.018) which means a significant decrease occurs in SS and LL when the distal fusion level changes from L3 to L4 but significant increase in PT in L3 group to compensate spinopelvic change after surgery.

Conclusion

The selection of more distal level for fusion adversely affects the compensation mechanisms of sagittal balance in Lenke 5 AIS patients.

Level of Evidence

Level IV, Therapeutic study.

SRS-22r Scores in Nonoperated Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis Patients With Curves Greater Than Forty Degrees

STUDY DESIGN

Case control comparative series.

OBJECTIVE

Describe surgical range adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) patients electing to forgo surgery and compare health-related quality-of-life outcomes to a similar cohort of operated AIS patients by the same single surgeon.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

No data have been published either documenting SRS-22r scores of nonoperated patients with curves ≥40° or comparing these scores to a demographically similar operated cohort.

METHODS

Individuals with curves ≥40°, age ≥18 years, and electing to forgo surgery were identified. All patients completed an SRS-22r questionnaire. This nonoperated cohort's SRS-22r scores were compared to those of a large demographically similar cohort operated by the same surgeon. Group differences between the SRS-22r scores were evaluated by comparing these to published Minimal Clinically Important Differences (MCID) for the SRS-22r.

RESULTS

One hundred ninety subjects with nonoperated curves were compared to 166 individuals who underwent surgery. The nonoperated cohort averaged 23.5 years of age, averaged 7.7 years since curve reached 40°, and had an average 50° Cobb angle at last follow-up. No statistical significant differences were found between the groups on the Pain, Function, or Mental Health domains of the SRS-22r. Statistically significant differences in favor of the operative cohort were found for self-image, satisfaction, and total score. The observed group differences did not meet the established thresholds for minimal clinically important differences in any of the domain scores, the average total score, or raw scores.

CONCLUSION

There are no meaningful clinically significant differences in SRS-22r scores at average 8-year follow-up between AIS patients with curves ≥40° treated with or without surgery. These data in conjunction with an absence of long-term evidence of serious medical consequences with nonsurgical management of curves ≥40° should encourage surgeons to reevaluate the benefits of routine surgical care.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

3.

Distal Fusion Level Selection in Scheuermann's Kyphosis: A Comparison of Lordotic Disc Segment Versus the Sagittal Stable Vertebrae

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective study.

OBJECTIVE

To compare 2 methods of selecting the lowest instrumented vertebra (LIV) on the rates of revision surgery for distal junctional kyphosis (DJK) following treatment for Scheuermann's kyphosis (SK).

METHODS

A retrospective review of patients who have undergone surgical treatment for SK was performed. Forty-four patients were divided into 2 groups based on intervention: Group 1 (n = 26) included patients who had an LIV distal to or at the sagittal stable vertebrae (SSV), and Group 2 (n = 18) included patients who had an LIV proximal to the SSV. For each group, demographic, radiographic, and revision surgery data was analyzed.

RESULTS

The average follow-up was 3.1 years. There were no differences among demographic variables between the groups. Preoperative and postoperative thoracic kyphosis, lumbar lordosis, and sagittal balance were not different between groups. Postoperatively, Group 1 demonstrated a significantly greater average lordotic disc angle below the LIV compared with Group 2 (Group 1, -6.2 ± 4.3° vs Group 2, -2.9 ± 5.8°; P = .02). In a subgroup analysis, extending fusions to the sagittal stable vertebra rather than the first lordotic disc resulted in fewer distal LIV complications necessitating revision surgery compared with fusing short of the SSV (5% vs 36.3%, P = .04).

CONCLUSION

The SSV method may reduce complications secondary to distal junctional failure, but at the expense of incorporating additional motion segments in a typically young population.

Neurologic Deficits Have a Negative Impact on Patient-Related Outcomes in Primary Presentation Adult Symptomatic Lumbar Scoliosis Surgical Treatment at One-Year Follow-up

STUDY DESIGN

A retrospective analysis of prospective, multicenter National Institute of Health clinical trial.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to assess the rate of neurologic complications and impact of new neurologic deficits on 1-year postoperative patient-reported outcomes (PROs).

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

There are limited studies evaluating the impact of new neurologic deficits on PROs following surgery for primary presentation adult lumbar scoliosis.

METHODS

Patients were divided into two groups: new postoperative neurological deficit (Def) or no deficit (NoDef). Preoperative and 1-year follow-up PROs were analyzed [Scoliosis Research Society (SRS) Questionnaire, Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), Short Form-12 Physical/Mental Health Composite Scores (PCS/MCS), and back/leg pain Numerical Rating Scale (NRS)].

RESULTS

One hundred forty-one patients: 14 Def (9.9%), 127 NoDef (90.1%). No differences were observed in demographic, radiographic, or PRO data between groups preoperatively. Def group had longer surgical procedures (8.3 vs. 6.9 hours, P = 0.030), greater blood loss (2832 vs. 2606 mL, P = 0.022), and longer hospitalizations (10.6 vs. 7.8 days, P = 0.004). NoDef group reported significant improvement in all PROs from preop to 1-year postoperative. Def group only had improvement in SRS Pain (2.7 preop to 3.4 postop, P = 0.037) and self-image domains (2.7 to 3.6, p = 0.004), and NRS back pain (6.6 to 3.2, P = 0.004) scores with significant worsening of NRS leg pain (4.1 to 6.1, P = 0.045). Group comparisons of 1-year postop PROs found that Def group reported more NRS leg pain (6.1 vs. 1.7, P < 0.001) and worse outcomes than NoDef group for ODI (35.7 vs. 23.1, P = 0.016) and PCS (32.6 vs. 41.9, P = 0.007).

CONCLUSION

We found a 9.9% rate of new neurologic deficits following surgery for symptomatic primary presentation adult lumbar scoliosis, much higher than previous studies. Most neurologic deficits improved by 1-year follow-up, but appeared to have a dramatic negative impact on PROs, with increased postoperative leg pain and greater patient-perceived pathology reported in patients experiencing neurological deficits compared with those who did not.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

3.

Correlation between radiographic parameters and functional scores in degenerative lumbar and thoracolumbar scoliosis

INTRODUCTION

Adult scoliosis is a condition in which the spinal deformity occurs because of degeneration. Although various studies have agreed on the importance of restoring the sagittal balance, few have evaluated the relationship between functional scores and radiological parameters. The primary objective of this retrospective study was to demonstrate the correlation between radiographic parameters and functional outcomes in adult patients with lumbar or thoracolumbar degenerative scoliosis. The secondary objective was to assess the long-term effects of posterolateral fusion for treating this deformity.

STUDY OUTLINE

This single-centre retrospective study included 47 patients over 50years of age who had degenerative lumbar scoliosis treated with an instrumented posterolateral fusion; the mean follow-up was 6.4years (range 2 to 20).

METHODS

Radiographic analysis of A/P and lateral full spine standing radiographs was carried out with the KEOPS software. Three pelvic parameters (pelvic tilt, pelvic incidence, sacral slope), two spinal parameters (lumbar lordosis and thoracic kyphosis) and three sagittal balance parameters (C7 sagittal tilt, C7 Barrey's ratio and spinosacral angle) were calculated. The functional outcomes were evaluated through three self-assessment questionnaires: Oswestry Disability Index, SRS-30 and SF-36. The correlation between clinical and radiographic parameters was calculated with Spearman's correlation test.

RESULTS

There was a significant correlation between the SF-36 (PCS) and the following three sagittal parameters: sacral slope (r=-0.31453; P=0.04), lumbar lordosis (r=-0.30198; P=0.0491) and spinosacral angle (r=-0.311967; P=0.0366). The mean ODI score was 33.61, which corresponds to minimal to moderate disability. The mean physical (PCS) and mental (MCS) component summary scores of the SF-36 were 37.70 and 38.40, respectively. The mean SRS-30 score was 3.07.

CONCLUSION

It is essential that the sagittal balance be restored when treating degenerative lumbar scoliosis to generate better functional outcomes and better quality of life. To achieve this correction, instrumented posterolateral fusion appears to be a very reliable technique that leads to lasting improvement.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV.

Results of Revision Surgery for Proximal Junctional Kyphosis Following Posterior Segmental Instrumentation: Minimum 2-Year Postrevision Follow-Up

STUDY DESIGN

A retrospective cohort study.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to evaluate radiographic and patient-reported outcomes at minimum 2 years after revision surgery for proximal junctional kyphosis (PJK), correlating these results with PJK etiology.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

There are no studies detailing the results of revision surgery for PJK following posterior segmental instrumentation.

METHODS

Thirty-two consecutive patients treated with revision surgery after PJK above posterior fusions (25 women/7 men, average age at surgery 60.6 yrs) were reviewed for radiographic and patient-reported outcomes (mean follow-up, 4.5 yrs; range, 2-10 yrs). Patients were subdivided into fracture (F) and nonfracture (NF) groups on the basis of PJK etiology.

RESULTS

Radiographic severity of PJK improved significantly with revision surgery and was maintained at ultimate follow-up (P < 0.001). However, initial sagittal vertical axis (SVA) correction was not maintained through ultimate follow-up (P = 0.04). There were significant postrevision improvements in mean Oswestry scores (P < 0.001) and SRS total scores (P < 0.001) in all patients. In patients with pelvic incidence-lumbar lordosis (PI-LL) mismatch < 11°, final PJK measurement was smaller than in patients with mismatch ≥11° (9.4° vs. 19.8°, P = 0.009). Six patients (19%) developed new postrevision PJK, with two (6%) requiring additional surgery. Patients who sustained PJK through a fracture had greater improvements in Oswestry (P = 0.004), total SRS (P = 0.04), pain (P < 0.001), and satisfaction (P = 0.05) scores, although the fracture patients had less maintained SVA correction (P = 0.002).

CONCLUSION

Revision surgery for PJK following posterior instrumentation achieved acceptable radiographic and clinical outcomes at minimum 2-year follow-up. Patients with PI-LL mismatch <11° experienced more ultimate PJK correction than patients with mismatch ≥11°. Although the NF group experienced more sustained correction of sagittal balance, the F group reported greater improvements in patient-reported outcomes. Ultimate clinical outcomes after revision surgery for PJK were similar between patients with and without compression fractures.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

3.

Detection of Pseudarthrosis in Adult Spinal Deformity: The Use of Health-related Quality-of-life Outcomes to Predict Pseudarthrosis

STUDY DESIGN

Single-center, retrospective study of consecutive surgeries.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to evaluate the reliability of previously published anterior fusion grading systems and assess the ability of health-related quality-of-life (HRQOL) outcomes to predict pseudarthrosis (PSAR).

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Despite existing radiographic indicators, PSAR may still go unidentified on biplanar radiographs, and little data is available on the reliability of such grading systems in adult spinal deformity patients. As such, there is a need for a practical, noninvasive tool to help identify PSAR.

METHODS

This study included consecutive primary surgical patients with idiopathic or degenerative scoliosis undergoing anterior and posterior correction with instrumentation to the sacrum or pelvis and minimum 2-year follow-up. Patients were grouped into fused (no radiographic or clinical signs of PSAR) and PSAR (known PSAR diagnosed by surgical exploration or thin-cut computed tomography scan at least 1 year after surgery) cohorts. Two-year radiographs were graded by an independent blinded orthopedic deformity surgeon and a neuroradiologist. HRQOL scores [22-item Scoliosis Research Society questionnaire (SRS-22) and the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI)] at 1-year follow-up were analyzed as potential predictors of future PSAR.

RESULTS

Thirty-four patients with average follow-up of 2.2 years (2-2.5 y) were evaluated. Eight (23.5%) patients had known PSAR consisting of 40 (24.8%) anterior levels. Analysis by independent reviewers incorrectly identified 2 levels as unfused and failed to identify any PSAR levels. The PSAR group had lower average SRS scores in all domains and lower average ODI scores at 1-year postoperatively relative to fused patients. The PSAR group also showed no significant improvement in SRS or ODI scores relative to baseline. In comparison, the fused group showed significant improvement in all domains.

CONCLUSIONS

Standard radiographs are insufficient for identifying PSAR in adult spinal deformity patients. Failure to achieve significant improvement in SRS and ODI should lead the surgeon to suspect PSAR and consider additional investigation.

Risk factors for revision surgery following primary adult spinal deformity surgery in patients 65 years and older

OBJECTIVE Surgical correction of adult spinal deformity (ASD) is a complex undertaking with high revision rates. The elderly population is poorly studied with regard to revision surgery, yet senior citizens constitute a rapidly expanding surgical demographic. Previous studies aimed at elucidating appropriate risk factors for revision surgery have been limited by small cohort sizes. The purpose of this study was to assess factors that modify the risk of revision surgery in elderly patients with ASD. METHODS The PearlDiver database (2005-2012) was used to determine revision rates in elderly ASD patients treated with a primary thoracolumbar posterolateral fusion of 8 or more levels. Analyzed risk factors included demographics, comorbid conditions, and surgical factors. Significant univariate predictors were further analyzed with multivariate analysis. The causes of revision at each year of follow-up were determined. RESULTS A total of 2293 patients who had been treated with posterolateral fusion of 8 or more levels were identified. At the 1-year follow-up, 241 (10.5%) patients had been treated with revision surgery, while 424 (18.5%) had revision surgery within 5 years. On univariate analysis, obesity was found to be a significant predictor of revision surgery at 1 year, while bone morphogenetic protein (BMP) use was found to significantly decrease revision surgery at 4 and 5 years of followup. Diabetes mellitus, osteoporosis, and smoking history were all significant univariate predictors of increased revision risk at multiple years of follow-up. Multivariate analysis at 5 years of follow-up revealed that osteoporosis (OR 1.98, 95% CI 1.60-2.46, p < 0.0001) and BMP use (OR 0.70, 95% CI 0.56-0.88, p = 0.002) were significantly associated with an increased and decreased revision risk, respectively. Smoking history trended toward significance (OR 1.37, 95% CI 1.10-1.70, p = 0.005). Instrument failure was consistently the most commonly cited reason for revision. Five years following surgery, it was estimated that the cohort had 68.8% survivorship. CONCLUSIONS For elderly patients with ASD, osteoporosis increases the risk of revision surgery, while BMP use decreases the risk. Other comorbidities were not found to be significant predictors of long-term revision rates. It is expected that within 5 years following the index procedure, over 30% of patients will require revision surgery.

The clinical importance of lumbosacral transitional vertebra in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective review of radiographs.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to (1) determine the prevalence of lumbosacral transitional vertebra (LSTV) with computed tomography (CT) and (2) correlate LSTV presence with lumbar disc degeneration at each level by magnetic resonance imaging.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

LSTV is a frequently observed abnormality. Although its prevalence in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) has been shown, no studies have yet examined the clinical importance of LSTV in patients with AIS.

METHODS

This study included 385 consecutive patients who underwent surgery for AIS at a single center. Plain radiographs and CT scans were used to detect LSTV. Disc degeneration was analyzed at the L3-4, L4-5, and L5-S1 disc levels with magnetic resonance imaging. The difference in disc degeneration at each level by the presence of LSTV was also analyzed. The effect of lumbar curve type on the disc degeneration of each level was then determined. To minimize confounding factors, logistic regression analysis was performed.

RESULTS

The overall prevalence of LSTV in patients with AIS confirmed by CT scans was 12.2% (47/385). The proportion of grade II or more disc degeneration at the L4-5 level was higher in the LSTV(+) group than in the LSTV(-) group (29.8% vs.19.2%) although it was not statistically significant (P = 0.093). Large lumbar curves showed a positive correlation with disc degeneration at the L5-S1 level (P = 0.022).

CONCLUSION

The prevalence of LSTV in patients with AIS was 12.2%. A trend of early degeneration in L4-5 level discs was found in patients with AIS with LSTV although it was not statistically confirmed. Disc degeneration at the L5-S1 level is related to a large lumbar curve. If patients with AIS with large lumbar curves have LSTV, consideration should be given to stopping the distal fusion at L3 instead of L4.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

4.

Pre- and postoperative spinopelvic sagittal balance in adolescent patients with lenke type 5 idiopathic scoliosis

STUDY DESIGN

A retrospective study.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the preoperative spinopelvic sagittal alignment in Lenke 5 patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS), and analyze how it alters after posterior correction.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

The structural thoracolumbar or lumbar curve may change the local sagittal alignment thereby altering the sagittal balance in Lenke 5 patients with AIS. However, few studies have evaluated the spinopelvic sagittal alignment before and after the surgery in these patients.

METHODS

Forty-eight Lenke 5 patients with AIS who underwent posterior correction and fusion were included in this study. Preoperative and postoperative radiographs were reviewed measuring both the coronal and sagittal parameters. Three pelvic sagittal states (anteverted, normal, or retroverted) were evaluated according to the magnitude relationship of individual pelvic tilt with pelvic incidence (PI). Both the coronal and sagittal parameters between different pelvic sagittal states were compared. The alterations of these parameters by surgery would also be analyzed.

RESULTS

The mean follow-up was 1.8 years. Preoperatively, the mean PI was 44.3° with a pelvic tilt of 4.1°. There was 48% patients showing the anteverted pelvis, whereas the remaining 52% showing normal. The patients with anteverted pelvis showed a smaller PI and more distal lower end vertebra than normal pelvis ones. Logistic regression analysis revealed PI (odds ratio [OR] = 0.62, P = 0.024) and lower end vertebra (OR = 2.1, P = 0.037) were significantly associated with the risk of developing anteverted pelvis. The pelvic tilt was significantly increased and 61% of patients with preoperative anteverted pelvis had recovered. Logistic regression analysis revealed PI (OR = 0.7, P = 0.034) and lower instrumented vertebra (OR = 6.5, P = 0.002) were significantly associated with the risk of postoperative uncovered of anteverted pelvis.

CONCLUSION

Anteverted pelvis appears in almost half of Lenke 5 patients with AIS, especially in who have smaller PI or distal lower end vertebra. The abnormal pelvic sagittal state will be generally corrected by posterior correction surgery except for patients with a PI less than 39° or a lower instrumented vertebra that extends to L5.

Matched Cohort Analysis of Posterior-Only Vertebral Column Resection Versus Combined Anterior/Posterior Vertebrectomy for Severe Spinal Deformity

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective matched cohort analysis.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Posterior-only vertebral column resection (P-VCR) is a potential alternative to combined anterior/posterior vertebrectomy (A-P/VCR) for the treatment of severe spinal deformity.

OBJECTIVE

To examine a matched cohort of adult and pediatric patients with severe spinal deformity treated with A/P-VCR versus P-VCR.

METHODS

Databases of 2 spine surgeons at 1 institution from 1994 to 2007 were reviewed. Patients were matched based on age at surgery (within 10 years), diagnosis, curve pattern, vertebrae resected (within 1), levels of vertebrae resected (within 2), levels fused (within 5), and minimum 2-year follow-up. A total of 34 P-VCR patients were identified who appropriately matched 34 A/P-VCR patients. The etiology of the deformity and type of curve were matched directly so that they were identical for each matched pair. The remainder of the inclusion parameters was matched as closely as possible between the 2 groups according to the criteria listed above.

RESULTS

Final coronal Cobb correction P-VCR versus A/P-VCR showed that 52.6% versus 53.9% (p = .8) was similar, whereas P-VCR final sagittal Cobb correction was superior: 53.0% versus 40.0% (p = .017). The P-VCR group had a significantly shorter total operative time (p = .002) and total length of stay (p = .003). Complications rates were similar and relatively infrequent for both P-VCR and A/P-VCR, including wound infections requiring operative intervention, subsequent revision surgery, and transient motor deficits. Total Scoliosis Research Society scores improved from preoperative to final follow-up for both P-VCR (p = .007) and A/P-VCR (p = .07) groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Posterior-only vertebral column resection is a challenging yet safe and effective means of treating severe scoliosis and/or kyphosis. Compared with an A/P-VCR for severe spinal deformity, P-VCR demonstrated shorter operative time and hospital stay, as well as improved sagittal correction and Scoliosis Research Society scores.

Reoperation rates and impact on outcome in a large, prospective, multicenter, adult spinal deformity database

Object

Complications and reoperation for surgery to correct adult spinal deformity are not infrequent, and many studies have analyzed the rates and factors that influence the likelihood of reoperation. However, there is a need for more comprehensive analyses of reoperation in adult spinal deformity surgery from a global standpoint, particularly focusing on the 1st year following operation and considering radiographic parameters and the effects of reoperation on health-related quality of life (HRQOL). This study attempts to determine the prevalence of reoperation following surgery for adult spinal deformity, assess the indications for these reoperations, evaluate for a relation between specific radiographic parameters and the need for reoperation, and determine the potential impact of reoperation on HRQOL measures.

Methods

A retrospective review was conducted of a prospective, multicenter, adult spinal deformity database collected through the International Spine Study Group. Data collected included age, body mass index, sex, date of surgery, information regarding complications, reoperation dates, length of stay, and operation time. The radiographic parameters assessed were total number of levels instrumented, total number of interbody fusions, C-7 sagittal vertical axis, uppermost instrumented vertebra (UIV) location, and presence of 3-column osteotomies. The HRQOL assessment included Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), 36-Item Short Form Health Survey physical component and mental component summary, and SRS-22 scores. Smoking history, Charlson Comorbidity Index scores, and American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status classification grades were also collected and assessed for correlation with risk of early reoperation. Various statistical tests were performed for evaluation of specific factors listed above, and the level of significance was set at p < 0.05.

Results

Fifty-nine (17%) of a total of 352 patients required reoperation. Forty-four (12.5%) of the reoperations occurred within 1 year after the initial surgery, including 17 reoperations (5%) within 30 days.

Two hundred sixty-eight patients had a minimum of 1 year of follow-up. Fifty-three (20%) of these patients had a 3-column osteotomy, and 10 (19%) of these 53 required reoperation within 1 year of the initial procedure. However, 3-column osteotomy was not predictive of reoperation within 1 year, p = 0.5476). There were no significant differences between groups with regard to the distribution of UIV, and UIV did not have a significant effect on reoperation rates. Patients needing reoperation within 1 year had worse ODI and SRS-22 scores measured at 1-year follow-up than patients not requiring operation.

Conclusions

Analysis of data from a large multicenter adult spinal deformity database shows an overall 17% reoperation rate, with a 19% reoperation rate for patients treated with 3-column osteotomy and a 16% reoperation rate for patients not treated with 3-column osteotomy. The most common indications for reoperation included instrumentation complications and radiographic failure. Reoperation significantly affected HRQOL outcomes at 1-year follow-up. The need for reoperation may be minimized by carefully considering spinal alignment, termination of fixation, and type of surgical procedure (presence of osteotomy). Precautions should be taken to avoid malposition or instrumentation (rod) failure.

Fate of the adult revision spinal deformity patient: a single institution experience

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective case series.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to determine the revision rates for all revision spinal deformity (SD) surgical procedures performed at a single center and to investigate the changes in measures of HRQL in these patients.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Reported revision rates for primary adult spinal fusion surgical procedures have been in the range of 9% to 45%, but to our knowledge, the revision rate after revision SD surgery has not been reported. The reported improvements in health-related quality of life measures after revision SD surgery have also been quite modest.

METHODS

Four hundred fifty-five consecutive adult revision SD surgical procedures (1995-2008) were identified and the records were reviewed to determine the reason for and timing to any additional operation(s). Scoliosis Research Society (SRS) Outcome scores were recorded at the first visit and at planned follow-up visits.

RESULTS

Ninety-four of 455 patients underwent further surgical procedures for a revision rate of 21%. Two-year follow-up was available for 74 (78%) of these patients (mean follow-up, 6.0 yr; range, 2.4-12.6; sex: F = 61, M = 13; mean age, 53 yr; range, 21-78). The most common causes of revision surgery were pseudarthrosis (N = 23, 31%), implant prominence/pain (N = 15, 20%), adjacent segment disease (N = 14, 19%), and infection (N = 10, 14%). Twenty-five (27%) patients underwent more than one revision procedure. SRS outcome scores were available for 50 (68%) patients, at an average follow-up of 4.9 years (range, 2-11.4). The mean improvements in the SRS outcome measures were as follows: pain, 0.74 (P < 0.001); self-image, 0.8 (P < 0.001); function, 0.5 (P < 0.001); satisfaction, 1.2 (P < 0.001); and mental health, 0.3 (P = 0.012).

CONCLUSION

The rate of revision after revision SD surgery was 21%, most commonly due to pseudarthrosis, adjacent segment disease, infection, and implant prominence/pain. However, significant improvements in SRS outcome scores were still observed in those patients requiring additional revision procedures.

Selection of fusion levels in adults with spinal deformity: an update

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

Adult spinal deformity (ASD) is commonly associated with disability and represents a challenging condition for physicians. Although surgical management has been reported as superior to conservative care, the choice of patient-specific optimal strategy has been poorly defined. A key question remains selection of fusion levels as this implies careful balance of risks and benefits.

PURPOSE

The aim of this review is to propose an update on current knowledge related to optimal fusion levels in the surgical treatment of ASD.

STUDY DESIGN

Literature review.

METHODS

Based on a comprehensive literature search, recent studies focusing on the management of ASD were reviewed to establish current concepts on fusion levels in the management of symptomatic ASD.

RESULTS

Despite numerous published studies, the management of ASD and specifically optimal fusion levels is incompletely defined. Described approaches carry benefits and risks. However, the need for detailed analysis and preoperative planning is confirmed as a prerequisite to obtaining realignment objectives and good outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

The treatment of ASD is emerging as an important health-care issue of the 21st century because of prevalence and cost. Despite technical advances related to ASD surgery, complication rates remain elevated, particularly in the older population. Recent research, mostly driven by outcome measures, has improved our understanding of optimal treatment approaches to ASD. The development of a widely accepted classification system will help to share knowledge and improve our ability to treat these complex patients.

Frequency, risk factors, and treatment of distal adjacent segment pathology after long thoracolumbar fusion: a systematic review

STUDY DESIGN

Systematic review.

OBJECTIVE

To systematically review the literature related to distal adjacent segment pathology (ASP) after long thoracolumbar fusions for deformity including frequency, risk factors, frequency differences between adolescents and adults, surgical approach for revision, and revision complications.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Spinal deformity surgery complications include ASP. Although ASP at the rostral end of instrumented fusions has been well described, substantially less has been documented about distal ASP.

METHODS

A systematic search was conducted in Medline and the Cochrane Collaboration Library for articles published between January 1, 1983, and March 15, 2012. We included all articles that described distal ASP after long thoracolumbar fusion for deformity. Radiographical ASP (RASP) was defined as evidence of ASP based on imaging, and clinical ASP (CASP) was defined as symptomatic ASP.

RESULTS

Seven retrospective cohort studies met inclusion criteria. Distal CASP developed in 17.7% at 2- 6-year follow-up and 19.8% at 9-year follow-up, whereas reoperation due to CASP was reported in 15.6% at 2 to 6 years and 14.4% at 9 years. Distal RASP was more frequent (44.7%-65.5%). Preoperative sagittal imbalance was associated with increased risk of distal ASP. There was increased risk of CASP in patients with higher postoperative fractional curve and increased risk of RASP in younger patients and those with preoperative disc degeneration, longer fusions, circumferential procedures, and postoperative L5-S1 disc space narrowing. No studies meeting inclusion criteria compared distal ASP in adults and adolescents or defined the best approach or complications for distal ASP revision.

CONCLUSION

Low-quality evidence suggests a cumulative rate of 18% to 20% for CASP and 45% to 65% for RASP after long thoracolumbar fusion for spinal deformity during 9-year follow-up. Low-quality evidence suggests an association between preoperative sagittal imbalance and distal ASP, with greater risk of distal ASP in patients with sagittal imbalance. Low-quality evidence suggests increased risk of CASP in patients with higher postoperative fractional curve and increased risk of RASP in younger patients and those with preoperative disc degeneration, longer fusions, circumferential procedures, and postoperative L5-S1 disc space narrowing.

CONSENSUS STATEMENT

1. The risk of developing new symptoms secondary to distal adjacent segment pathology following long thoracolumbar fusion for deformity is approximately 18–20% during a period of 9 years follow up, and most of these patients will require revision surgery. Strength of Statement: Weak. 2. The risk of developing distal adjacent segment pathology may be higher in those with preoperative sagittal imbalance, preoperative disc degeneration, longer fusions, circumferential procedures, and postoperative L5–S1 disc space narrowing. Strength of Statement: Weak.

Kinematic evaluation of one- and two-level Maverick lumbar total disc replacement caudal to a long thoracolumbar spinal fusion

PURPOSE

Adjacent level degeneration that occurs above and/or below long fusion constructs is a documented clinical problem that is widely believed to be associated with the considerable change in stiffness caused by the fusion. Some researchers have suggested that early degeneration at spinal joints adjacent to a fusion could be treated by implanting total disc replacements at these levels. It is thought that further degeneration could be prevented through the disc replacement's design aims to reproduce normal disc heights, kinematics and tissue loading. For this reason, there is a clinical need to evaluate if a total disc replacement can maintain both the quantity of motion (i.e. range) and the quality of motion (i.e. center of rotation and coupling) at segments adjacent to a long spinal fusion. The purpose of this study was to experimentally evaluate range of motion (ROM-the intervertebral motion measured) and helical axis of motion (HAM) changes due to one- and two-level Maverick total disc replacement (TDR) adjacent to a long spinal fusion.

METHODS

Seven spine specimens (T8-S1) were used in this study (66 ± 19 years old, 3F/4 M). A continuous pure moment of ±5.0 Nm was applied to the specimen in flexion-extension (FE), lateral bending (LB) and axial rotation (AR), with a compressive follower preload of 400 N. The 5.0 Nm data were analyzed to evaluate the operated segment biomechanics at the level of the disc replacements. The data were also analyzed at lower moments using a modified version of Panjabi's proposed "hybrid" method to evaluate adjacent segment kinematics (intervertebral motion at the segments adjacent to the fusion) under identical overall (T8-S1) specimen rotations. The motion of each vertebra was monitored with an optoelectronic camera system. The biomechanical test was completed for (1) the intact condition and repeated after each surgical technique was applied to the specimen, (2) capsulotomy at L4-L5 and L5-S1, (3) T8-L4 fusion and capsulotomy at L4-L5 and L5-S1, (4) Maverick at L4-L5, and (5) Maverick at L5-S1. The capsulotomy was performed to allow measurement of facet joint loads in a companion study. Paired t tests were used to determine if differences in the kinematic parameters measured were significant. Holm-Sidak corrections for multiple comparisons were applied where appropriate.

RESULTS

Under the 5.0 Nm loads, L4-L5 ROMs tended to decrease in all directions following L4-L5 Maverick replacement (mean = 22 %, compared to the fused condition). Two-level Maverick implantation also tended to reduce L4-S1 ROM (mean 18, 7 and 31 % in FE, LB and AR, respectively, compared to the fused condition without TDR). Following TDR replacement, the HAM location tended to shift posteriorly in FE (at L5-S1), anteriorly in AR, and inferiorly in LB. However, although the above-mentioned trends were observed, neither one- nor two-level TDR replacement showed statistically significant ROM or HAM change in any of the three directions. At the identical T8-S1 posture identified by the modified hybrid analysis, the L4-L5 and L5-S1 levels underwent significant larger motions, relative to the overall specimen rotation, after fusion. In the hybrid analysis, there were no significant differences between the ROM after fusion with intact natural discs at L4-L5 and L5-S1 and the motions at those levels with one or two TDRs implanted.

CONCLUSIONS

The present results demonstrated that one or two Maverick discs implanted subjacent to a long thoracolumbar fusion preserved considerable and intact-like ranges of motion and maintained motion patterns similar to the intact specimen, in this ex vivo study with applied pure moments and compressive follower preload. The hybrid analysis demonstrated that, after fusion, the TDR-implanted levels are required to undergo large rotations, relative to those necessary before fusion, in order to achieve the same motion between T8 and S1. Additional clinical and biomechanical research is necessary to determine if such a kinematic demand would be made on these levels clinically and the biomechanical performance of these implants if it were.

Complications and risk factors of primary adult scoliosis surgery: a multicenter study of 306 patients

STUDY DESIGN

A multicentric retrospective study on primary adult scoliosis patients operated on between 2002 and 2007. A 3-step statistical analysis was performed to describe the incidence of complications, the risk factors, and the reoperation risk with survival curves for the entire cohort.

OBJECTIVE

To describe complication rate and risk factors as well as survival curves associated with adult primary scoliosis surgery in patients aged 50 years or older.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Adult deformity surgery is classically associated with a high rate of complications. The identification of risk factors for developing such complications is consequently of major interest as well as survival curves that can provide useful information on reoperation risks. Although many reports exist in the literature, the cohorts analyzed are often heterogeneous and the actual prevalence of complications varies widely. This study represents to our knowledge the largest series on adult patients aged 50 years or older operated for the first time for lumbar or thoracolumbar scoliosis and excluding every other possible diagnosis.

METHODS

A retrospective review of prospectively collected data from 6 centers in France. A total of 306 primary lumbar adult or degenerative scoliosis patients older than 50 years undergoing surgery between 2002 and 2007 were included. Demographics, comorbidities, x-ray parameters, surgical data, and complications were analyzed. Statistical analysis was performed to obtain correlations and risk factors for developing complications. Reoperation risk was calculated with Kaplan-Meier survival curves.

RESULTS

A total of 306 patients aged 63 years (range, 50-83), with 83% women. Mean follow-up was 54 months. Mean Cumulative Illness Rating Scale score was 5 (range, 0-26). Main curve was 50° (range, 4-96) with apex between T12 and L2. Ten percent of patients had anterior surgery only, 18% had double anteroposterior approach, and 72% had posterior surgery only. Seventy-four percent (226 patients) had long fusions of 3 or more levels and 44% (134 patients) were fused to the sacrum. Forty percent (122 patients) had a decompression performed and 18% had an osteotomy. There were 175 complications for 119 patients (39%). No cases of death or blindness were reported. General complication rate was 13.7%, early infection occurred in 4% (12 patients), and late infection occurred in 1.2%. Neurological complications were present in 7% with 2 cases (0.6%) of late cord-level deficits and 12 reoperations (4%). Prevalence of mechanical complications was 24% (73 patients), with 58 patients (19%) needing a reoperation. Risk factors for mechanical or neurological complications were number of instrumented vertebra (P ≤ 0.01) fusion to the sacrum (P ≤ 0.001), pedicle subtraction osteotomy (PSO) (P = 0.01), and a high preoperative pelvic tilt of 26° or more (P ≤ 0.05). Kaplan-Meier survival curves showed reoperation risk of 44% at 70 months. Long fusion risk was 40% at 50 months and fusions to the sacrum reoperation risk was 48% at 49 months.

CONCLUSION

Overall complication rate was 39%, and 26% of the patients were reoperated for mechanical or neurological complications. Risk factors include number of instrumented vertebra, fusion to the sacrum, PSO, and preoperative pelvic tilt of 26° or more. There is a 44% risk of a new operation in the 6-year-period after the primary procedure.

Revision spine surgery to manage pediatric deformity

Revision deformity surgery in the growing child is a complex clinical problem. Excellent outcomes can be obtained with meticulous patient evaluation followed by well-planned and well-executed treatment. A multidisciplinary team is crucial to a satisfactory overall outcome. Diagnosis of failed index spine fusion requires a thorough patient history and physical examination, careful patient assessment, and imaging between the index procedure and the presentation for revision and confirmatory testing that validates the diagnosis. Revision surgery may include irrigation and débridement, implant removal, or revision spine fusion with deformity correction. Correction may require either an anterior approach or a posterior approach with osteotomy. For best results, the planned revision must address the mechanism of the failure of the index procedure. If the symptoms or observations are not explained by the diagnosis, then alternative etiologies should be considered.

Complications in spine surgery

OBJECT

The overall incidence of complications or adverse events in spinal surgery is unknown. Both prospective and retrospective analyses have been performed, but the results have not been critically assessed. Procedures for different regions of the spine (cervical and thoracolumbar) and the incidence of complications for each have been reported but not compared. Authors of previous reports have concentrated on complications in terms of their incidence relevant to healthcare providers: medical versus surgical etiology and the relevance of perioperative complications to perioperative events. Few authors have assessed complication incidence from the patient's perspective. In this report the authors summarize the spine surgery complications literature and address the effect of study design on reported complication incidence.

METHODS

A systematic evidence-based review was completed to identify within the published literature complication rates in spinal surgery. The MEDLINE database was queried using the key words "spine surgery" and "complications." This initial search revealed more than 700 articles, which were further limited through an exclusion process. Each abstract was reviewed and papers were obtained. The authors gathered 105 relevant articles detailing 80 thoracolumbar and 25 cervical studies. Among the 105 articles were 84 retrospective studies and 21 prospective studies. The authors evaluated the study designs and compared cervical, thoracolumbar, prospective, and retrospective studies as well as the durations of follow-up for each study.

RESULTS

In the 105 articles reviewed, there were 79,471 patients with 13,067 reported complications for an overall complication incidence of 16.4% per patient. Complications were more common in thoracolumbar (17.8%) than cervical procedures (8.9%; p < 0.0001, OR 2.23). Prospective studies yielded a higher incidence of complications (19.9%) than retrospective studies (16.1%; p < 0.0001, OR 1.3). The complication incidence for prospective thoracolumbar studies (20.4%) was greater than that for retrospective series (17.5%; p < 0.0001). This difference between prospective and retrospective reviews was not found in the cervical studies. The year of study publication did not correlate with the complication incidence, although the duration of follow-up did correlate with the complication incidence (p = 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Retrospective reviews significantly underestimate the overall incidence of complications in spine surgery. This analysis is the first to critically assess differing complication incidences reported in prospective and retrospective cervical and thoracolumbar spine surgery studies.

Adjacent segment disease after instrumented fusion for idiopathic scoliosis: review of current trends and controversies

STUDY DESIGN

A literature-based review.

OBJECTIVE

To summarize the clinical and morphologic findings leading to diagnosis, the etiologic factors, and principles of management. To identify the strengths and limits of past studies.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

There are considerable controversies regarding etiologic factors, diagnosis, and management of adjacent segment disease in patients instrumented for idiopathic scoliosis.

METHODS

Summarized is past literature and, to some extent, personal experience of the authors.

RESULTS

Several factors participating to this complex pathophysiology are reported. The clinical presentation, occurring after symptom free interval, can vary, and modern morphologic investigations help for diagnosis. Management is often surgical and remains challenging.

CONCLUSIONS

Long-term consequences of spinal fusions are now major concerns, especially in young patients undergoing surgical correction for idiopathic scoliosis. Adjacent segment disease is defined by a combination of clinical symptoms and morphologic findings. Several etiologic factors have been reported, but need to be further studied to prevent and improve the surgical management of this complication.

Adult scoliosis in patients over sixty-five years of age: outcomes of operative versus nonoperative treatment at a minimum two-year follow-up

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective case-control study.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to compare the self-reported outcomes between operatively and nonoperatively treated patients over the age of 65 with adult scoliosis, using 4 distinct self-assessment questionnaires (SRS-22, SF-12, EQ5D, and Oswestry disability index [ODI]) and standard radiographic measurement parameters.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

The current spine literature contains no studies that directly compare the self-reported and radiographic outcomes of operatively and nonoperatively treated patients over the age of 65 years with adult scoliosis.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed the self-reported outcomes of 83 adult scoliosis in patients over the age of 65 years. A total of 34 patients were treated operatively, whereas 49 patients were managed nonoperatively. For each of these patients, standard radiographic measurements were recorded both before and after treatment, and each patient received 4 questionnaires (SRS-22, SF-12, EQ5D, and ODI) that were completed with a minimum of 2-year follow-up from the time the treatment was initiated. The outcomes of both groups were then statistically compared.

RESULTS

As compared to the nonoperative group, the operative group reported significantly better self-assessment scores for the EQ5D index, EQ5D Visual Analogue Score, and SRS-22 questionnaires. However, no statistically significant difference between the groups was detected for the ODI, SF-12 Mental Health Component Summary, and SF-12 PCS. Furthermore, the operative group also had a significant improvement in radiographic measurements.

CONCLUSION

Adult scoliosis patients over the age of 65 years treated operatively had significantly less pain, a better health-related quality of life, self image, mental health, and were more satisfied with their treatment than patients treated conservatively. However, we found no statistically significant differences in their degree of disability as measured by the ODI as well as physical and mental health by the SF-12 instrument. Preoperative radiographic deformity was not determined to be a significant factor for predicting whether an operative or nonoperative treatment course was chosen.

Reoperation after primary fusion for adult spinal deformity: rate, reason, and timing

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study of consecutive patients undergoing primary fusion with segmental fixation for adult spinal deformity.

OBJECTIVE

We sought to determine the survivorship of primary fusion for adult spinal deformity and identify patient-specific predictors of complications requiring reoperation.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Compared with the adolescent population, surgery for adult deformity is often more complex and technically difficult, contributing to a high reported rate of complications that can result in the need for reoperation. Reported complication rates vary widely.

METHODS

From 1999-2004 all patients who underwent primary instrumented fusion for nonparalytic adult spinal deformity at a single center were included. Inclusion criteria included minimum age at surgery of 20 years and minimum fusion length of 4 motion segments. Surgical, demographic, and comorbidity data were recorded. Reoperation was defined as any additional surgery involving levels of the spine operated on during the index procedure and/or adjacent levels. Comparisons were performed between patients who required reoperation and those who did not.

RESULTS

Eighty-nine patients met inclusion criteria. Endpoint (minimum 2 years follow-up or reoperation) was reached for 91%. Mean follow-up was 3.8 years. Cumulative reoperation rate was 25.8%. Survival was 86.4% at 1 year, 77.2% at 2 years, and 75.2% at 3 years. Reasons for reoperation included infection (n = 8), pseudarthrosis (n = 3), adjacent segment problems (n = 5), implant failure (n = 4), and removal of painful implants (n = 3). Multivariate analysis showed smoking was significantly higher in the reoperation group.

CONCLUSION

Using a strict definition of reoperation for a well-defined cohort, in the presence of relevant risk factors, many patients undergoing primary fusion for adult spinal deformity required reoperation. The results indicate that complex medical and surgical factors contribute to the treatment challenges posed by patients with adult spinal deformity. This represents the largest cohort reported to date of patients undergoing primary fusion using third-generation instrumentation techniques.

Lumbar curve response to selective thoracic fusion in adult idiopathic scoliosis

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

To date, no study has critically examined the radiographic characteristics of the lumbar curve after selective thoracic fusion for the adult idiopathic scoliosis patient population.

PURPOSE

To evaluate the radiographic response of the lumbar curve to selective thoracic fusion in the adult scoliosis population with correlative clinical outcomes.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective case series.

PATIENT SAMPLE

Thirty patients with idiopathic scoliosis surgically treated at a mean age of 40 years (range, 20-66) using a posterior translational technique.

OUTCOME MEASURES

Radiographic review and functional outcome assessment.

METHODS

A retrospective, minimum 2-year follow-up, radiographic, and clinical review. All patients underwent selective thoracic posterior fusion with end-instrumented vertebra at T11 (1), T12 (7), L1 (14), and L2 (8).

RESULTS

At a mean follow-up of 39 (range, 24-87) months, spontaneous lumbar curve Cobb improvement (36 degrees -18 degrees = 50% correction) was less than the bending radiograph (12 degrees , 68% correction). Lowest-instrumented vertebra (LIV) tilt angle improved from 24 to 9 degrees and LIV disc angle improved from 8 to 4 degrees (p < .001). Lumbar apical disc angle improved from 10 to 7 degrees (p < .001). Lumbar apical vertebral translation remained unchanged from pre-op (17 mm) to latest follow-up (17 mm) (p = .23). Lumbar curve rotation increased from 8 to 10 degrees (p = .11). One patient had coronal imbalance of greater than 3 cm and two patients had greater than 3 cm of negative sagittal imbalance. Mean subgroup scores of the Scoliosis Research Society-22 questionnaire improved (p < .01) for pain (3.0-3.8) and self-image (2.5-4.0) but remained the same for function and mental health. Only one patient required extension of fusion to include the lumbar curve 6 years postoperatively.

CONCLUSIONS

The lumbar curve response in adult, selective thoracic scoliosis surgery is characterized by 1) moderate correction but less than the bending film Cobb; 2) greater change in LIV tilt and disc angle than apical vertebra disc angle; 3) no change in lumbar apical translation or rotation; 4) more significant disc height preservation at the LIV compared with lumbar apex. Good clinical outcomes can be achieved with posterior translational instrumentation in adult scoliosis patients.

Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) - an indication for surgery? A systematic review of the literature

PURPOSE

Historically, the treatment options for AIS, the most common form of scoliosis are: Exercises, in-patient rehabilitation, braces and surgery. While there is evidence in the form of prospective controlled studies that Scoliosis Intensive Rehabilitation (SIR) and braces can alter the natural history of the condition, there is no review on prospective controlled trials for surgical treatment. The aim of this review was to perform a systematic search of the Pub Med literature to reveal the evidence on scoliosis surgery.

METHODS

A systematic review has been performed using the Pub Med database. Literature has been searched for the outcome parameter; 'rate of progression' and only prospective controlled studies that have considered the treatment versus the natural history have been included.

RESULTS

No controlled study, not in the short, mid or long term, searched within the review, has been found to reveal evidence to support the hypothesis that the effects of surgery as a treatment option for AIS is superior to natural history.

CONCLUSIONS

No evidence has been found in terms of prospective controlled studies to support surgical intervention from the medical point of view. In the light of the unknown long-term effects of surgery and in concluding on the lack of evidence already found that surgery might change the signs and symptoms of scoliosis, a randomized controlled trial (RCT) is long overdue. Until such a time that such evidence exists, there can be no medical indication for surgery. The indications for surgery are limited for cosmetic reasons in severe cases and only if the patient and the family agree with this.

Rate of complications in scoliosis surgery - a systematic review of the Pub Med literature

Background

Spinal fusion surgery is currently recommended when curve magnitude exceeds 40–45 degrees. Early attempts at spinal fusion surgery which were aimed to leave the patients with a mild residual deformity, failed to meet such expectations. These aims have since been revised to the more modest goals of preventing progression, restoring 'acceptability' of the clinical deformity and reducing curvature.

In view of the fact that there is no evidence that health related signs and symptoms of scoliosis can be altered by spinal fusion in the long-term, a clear medical indication for this treatment cannot be derived. Knowledge concerning the rate of complications of scoliosis surgery may enable us to establish a cost/benefit relation of this intervention and to improve the standard of the information and advice given to patients. It is also hoped that this study will help to answer questions in relation to the limiting choice between the risks of surgery and the "wait and see – observation only until surgery might be recommended", strategy widely used. The purpose of this review is to present the actual data available on the rate of complications in scoliosis surgery.

Materials and methods

Search strategy for identification of studies; Pub Med and the SOSORT scoliosis library, limited to English language and bibliographies of all reviewed articles. The search strategy included the terms; 'scoliosis'; 'rate of complications'; 'spine surgery'; 'scoliosis surgery'; 'spondylodesis'; 'spinal instrumentation' and 'spine fusion'.

Results

The electronic search carried out on the 1^st February 2008 with the key words "scoliosis", "surgery", "complications" revealed 2590 titles, which not necessarily attributed to our quest for the term "rate of complications". 287 titles were found when the term "rate of complications" was used as a key word. Rates of complication varied between 0 and 89% depending on the aetiology of the entity investigated. Long-term rates of complications have not yet been reported upon.

Conclusion

Scoliosis surgery has a varying but high rate of complications. A medical indication for this treatment cannot be established in view of the lack of evidence. The rate of complications may even be higher than reported. Long-term risks of scoliosis surgery have not yet been reported upon in research. Mandatory reporting for all spinal implants in a standardized way using a spreadsheet list of all recognised complications to reveal a 2-year, 5-year, 10-year and 20-year rate of complications should be established. Trials with untreated control groups in the field of scoliosis raise ethical issues, as the control group could be exposed to the risks of undergoing such surgery.

Lumbar disc degeneration below a long arthrodesis (performed for scoliosis in adults) to L4 or L5

A retrospective analysis of adults treated with long instrumented fusion for scoliosis from the thoracic spine proximally to L4 or L5. To evaluate the long-term clinical outcomes as well as radiological changes in distal unfused mobile segments and to evaluate factors that may predispose to distal disc degeneration and/or poor outcome. A total of 151 mobile segments in 85 patients (65 female), mean age 43.2 (range 21-68), were studied. Curve type, number of fused levels and pelvic incidence were recorded. Clinical outcome was measured using the Whitecloud function scale and disc degeneration using the UCLA disc degeneration score. Spinal balance, local segmental angulations and lumbar lordosis were measured pre- and post-operatively as well as at the most recent follow up--mean 9.3 years (range 7-19). A total of 62% of patients had a good or excellent outcome. Eleven had a poor outcome of which ten underwent extension of fusion--five for pain alone, three for pain with stenosis and two for pseudarthroses. Pre-operative disc degeneration was often asymmetric and was slightly greater in older patients. Overall, there was a significant deterioration in disc degeneration (P < 0.0001) that did not correlate with clinical outcome. Disc degeneration correlated with the recent sagittal balance (Anova F = 14.285, P < 0.001) and the most recent lordosis (Anova F = 4.057, P = 0.048). The post-operative sagittal balance and local L5-S1 sagittal angulation correlated to L4 and L5 degeneration, respectively. There was no correlation between degeneration and age, pre-operative degenerative score, pelvic incidence, sacral slope, number of fused levels or distal level of fusion. Disc degeneration does occur below an arthrodesis for scoliosis in adults which does not correlate with clinical outcome. The correlation of loss of sagittal balance with disc degeneration may be as a result of degeneration causing the loss of balance or vice versa, i.e. sagittal imbalance causing degeneration. Immediate post-operative imbalance correlates with degeneration of the L4/5 disc, which may imply the latter.

Effect of age on clinical and radiographic outcomes and adverse events following 1-level lumbar arthroplasty after a minimum 2-year follow-up

Object

Lumbar arthroplasty is approved in the US for the treatment of degenerative disc disease at 1 level in skeletally mature patients. However, a bias toward older patients (> 45 years of age) who are otherwise indicated for the procedure may exist. In this study, the clinical outcomes of patients from the Charité Investigational Device Exemption (IDE) study were analyzed on the basis of patient age.

Methods

There were 276 patients enrolled in the IDE study of the Charité Artificial Disc who underwent 1-level arthroplasty at either L4–5 or L5–S1, including 71 nonrandomized and 205 randomized individuals. Patient data were analyzed based on age (18–45 years [217 patients, Group 1] compared with 46–60 years [59 patients, Group 2]). Statistical analyses were performed based on 2-year postoperative improvements in Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), 36-item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36), and visual analog scale (VAS) scores (clinical outcome), as well as range of motion (radiographic outcome), and adverse events.

Results

There was no significant difference between the groups with respect to level implanted, operative time, blood loss, changes in ODI and VAS scores or any of the 8 component scores of the SF-36, compared with baseline, at all time points throughout the 24-month follow-up period (p > 0.10). Patient satisfaction was equivalent at 24 months, with 87% satisfaction in Group 1 and 85% satisfaction in Group 2 (no statistical difference). In addition, no significant differences were identified with respect to adverse events including approach related, neurological, technique related, or reoperation.

Conclusions

Although patients > 45 years of age may have comorbidities or contraindications for arthroplasty for a number of reasons, particularly osteopenia, this analysis demonstrates that patients who are indicated for 1-level arthroplasty experience similar clinical outcome, satisfaction, or adverse events compared with their younger counterparts.

The impact of perioperative complications on clinical outcome in adult deformity surgery

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective case-control series.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study is to determine whether perioperative complications alter subsequent clinical outcome measures in adult spinal deformity surgery.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Increasingly, the benefit of surgical intervention is being evaluated based on patient reported outcomes and standardized health related quality of life (HRQOL) measures. As improvement or deterioration in HRQOL scores becomes a standard for clinical evaluation in adult spinal deformity, the correlation between HRQOL outcome scores and historic benchmarks, such as curve correction, sagittal balance, fusion healing, or the occurrence of a complication, must be clarified.

METHODS

This study analyzes a prospective multicenter data base for adult spinal deformity. Patients with major, minor, and no complications were matched using a logistic regression technique producing 46 patients in each group. Standardized outcome measures at baseline and at 1 year postop were compared.

RESULTS

Forty-seven major complications were reported in 46 patients. Sixty-two minor complications were noted in 46 patients. Comparison between the 3 complication groups revealed that 1-year postoperative outcome measures were not statistically different for the Scoliosis Research Society Outcomes Instrument, Medical Outcomes Short Form-36 (SF-12), Oswestry Disability Index, or Numerical Pain Scales. The only significant interaction was in the rate of change from preop to 1-year postop for the SF-12 general health subscale. For the group with major complications, SF-12 general health deteriorated by 2.1 points from preop to 1-year postop. During the same period, the group with minor complications experienced an improvement of 4.2 points and the group with no complications experienced an improvement of 1.5 points.

CONCLUSION

This study suggests that risk for minor complications may be a less substantial obstacle than previously assumed for surgical treatment in adult spinal deformity. In contrast, major complications were reported in approximately 10% of cases and adversely affected outcome as evidenced by the deterioration in SF-12 general health scores at 1 year after surgery.

Idiopathic scoliosis treated with Cotrel-Dubousset instrumentation: evaluation 10 years after surgery

STUDY DESIGN

Prospective cohort study with 10-year follow-up.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate long-term results after operative treatment with Cotrel-Dubousset (CD) instrumentation for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS).

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Limited knowledge exists in the evaluation of long-term function with quality of life measures after CD instrumentation in patients with AIS.

METHODS

A total of 100 (76 females and 24 males) consecutive AIS patients all with single primary curves were included. Radiologic measures and pain were registered at baseline and at 1- to 5-year follow-up. Quality of life and back specific measures, including EuroQol (EQ) and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), were obtained by a questionnaire mailed to the patients at 10 years after surgery.

RESULTS

Mean age at operation was 16.8 (SD, 5.3) years, mean Risser sign was Grade 3.2 (SD, 1.5). All patients were observed for 2 years. The average primary curve was reduced from 56 degrees to 19 degrees, and this correction was maintained during follow-up. Fourteen patients had minor complications, and 5 patients had implants removed because of late clinically suspected infections. A total of 86 patients answered the 10-year questionnaire; 97% of the patients considered back function as excellent, good, or fair, and 96% would have done the operation again. Scores for EQ-5D and ODI were slightly worse than in the normal population. Despite this observation, 45% of the patients reported to have consulted a physician or received physiotherapy for back pain during the last year before the 10-year follow-up.

CONCLUSION

Radiologic results, patient satisfaction, and mean scores for quality of life and back function were excellent after CD instrumentation for AIS, but a considerable number of patients had treatment for back problems.

Anterior lumbar instrumentation improves correction of severe lumbar Lenke C curves in double major idiopathic scoliosis

Fifteen skeletally immature patients with double major adolescent idiopathic scoliosis with large lumbar curves and notable L4 and L5 coronal plane obliquity were retrospectively studied. Seven patients who underwent anterior release and fusion of the lumbar curve with segmental anterior instrumentation and subsequent posterior instrumentation ending at L3 were compared with eight patients treated with anterior release and fusion without anterior instrumentation followed by posterior instrumentation to L3 or L4. At 4.5 years follow-up (range 2.5-7 years), curve correction, coronal balance and fusion rate were not statistically different between the two groups; however, the group with anterior instrumentation had improved coronal plane, near normalangulation in the distal unfused segment compared with the group without anterior instrumentation. In cases involving severe lumbar curvatures in the context of double major scoliosis, when as a first stage anterior release is chosen, the addition of instrumentation appears to restore normal coronal alignment of the distal unfused lumbar segment, and may in certain cases save a level compared with traditional fusions to L4.

Comparison of thoracic pedicle screw to hook instrumentation for the treatment of adult spinal deformity

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective, case-control, matched cohort.

OBJECTIVE

Compare the radiographic and clinical outcomes of adult spinal deformity patients treated with thoracic pedicle screw (TPS) or thoracic hook constructs.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

The efficacy of TPS instrumentation for pediatric spinal deformity correction has been established. Little is known about TPS use in adult spinal deformity.

METHODS

Fifty-six patients (average age, 49 years; average follow-up, 3.58 years) were treated with TPS or thoracic hook constructs for coronal (n = 20) or sagittal (n = 36) plane deformities. Patients were evaluated radiographically and with SRS scores.

RESULTS

Coronal deformities treated with TPS demonstrated improved main thoracic curve correction compared with hook constructs at last follow-up (24.8 degrees vs. 13.8 degrees; P < 0.05), despite having larger (59.8 degrees vs. 44.9 degrees; P < 0.05) and more rigid preoperative curves (29.3% vs. 44.9% correction on side-bending radiographs; P < 0.001). Sagittal deformities treated with TPS constructs demonstrated greater thoracolumbar kyphosis correction than hook constructs at last follow-up (12.1 degrees vs. 2.5 degrees; P < 0.05). No TPS patient had a thoracic pseudarthrosis. Four hook patients (14%) had thoracic pseudarthroses.

CONCLUSIONS

TPS instrumentation allows greater coronal and sagittal plane correction and may reduce the risk of thoracic pseudarthrosis compared with hook constructs when treating adult spinal deformities.

Impact of spine surgery on signs and symptoms of spinal deformity

Paediatric scoliosis is associated with signs and symptoms including reduced pulmonary function, increased pain and impaired quality of life, all of which worsen during adulthood, even when the curvature remains stable. Spinal fusion has been used as a treatment for nearly 100 years. In 1941, the American Orthopedic Association reported that for 70% of patients treated surgically, outcome was fair or poor: an average 65% curvature correction was reduced to 27% at >2 year follow-up and the torso deformity was unchanged or worse. Outcome was worse in children treated surgically before age 10, despite earlier intervention. Today, a reduced magnitude of curvature obtained by spinal fusion in adolescence can be maintained for decades. However, successful surgery still does not eliminate spinal curvature and it introduces irreversible complications whose long-term impact is poorly understood. For most patients there is little or no improvement in pulmonary function. Some report improved pain after surgery, some report no improvement and some report increased pain. The rib deformity is eliminated only by rib resection which can dramatically reduce respiratory function even in healthy adolescents. Outcome for pulmonary function and deformity is worse in patients treated surgically before the age of 10 years, despite earlier intervention. Research to develop effective non-surgical methods to prevent progression of mild, reversible spinal curvatures into complex, irreversible structural deformities, is long overdue.

Relation between the sagittal pelvic and lumbar spine geometries following surgical correction of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis

Sagittal spinopelvic relations have been reported in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS), but there is little information on their effect following surgery. The objective of this study is to evaluate the relation between the pelvic and lumbar spine geometries following posterior spinal instrumentation and fusion (PSIF). Sixty patients with AIS undergoing PSIF were studied retrospectively. Thoracic kyphosis (TK), lumbar lordosis (LL), LL within and below fusion, pelvic incidence (PI), sacral slope (SS) and pelvic tilt (PT) were measured on preoperative and postoperative standing lateral radiographs. Significant postoperative correlations were found between PI and LL (r = 0.67), SS and LL (r = 0.90), PI and LL below fusion (r = 0.40), SS and LL below fusion (r = 0.48). Pelvic parameters did not influence LL within fusion. A strong correlation was found between LL below and within fusion (r = -0.76). The close interdependence between lumbar lordosis and pelvic geometry preoperatively is maintained postoperatively following PSIF. In the planning of surgery for AIS, it may be helpful to evaluate the sagittal pelvic morphology (PI) in addition to the spinal curves. Preoperative evaluation of the pelvic morphology could be used to optimize intraoperative positioning of the patient and to determine the optimal amount of LL that needs to be restored or preserved by the instrumentation, so that LL remains congruent with the pelvic morphology.

The adult scoliosis

Adult scoliosis is defined as a spinal deformity in a skeletally mature patient with a Cobb angle of more than 10 degrees in the coronal plain. Adult scoliosis can be separated into four major groups: Type 1: Primary degenerative scoliosis, mostly on the basis of a disc and/or facet joint arthritis, affecting those structures asymmetrically with predominantly back pain symptoms, often accompanied either by signs of spinal stenosis (central as well as lateral stenosis) or without. These curves are often classified as "de novo" scoliosis. Type 2: Idiopathic adolescent scoliosis of the thoracic and/or lumbar spine which progresses in adult life and is usually combined with secondary degeneration and/or imbalance. Some patients had either no surgical treatment or a surgical correction and fusion in adolescence in either the thoracic or thoracolumbar spine. Those patients may develop secondary degeneration and progression of the adjacent curve; in this case those curves belong to the type 3a. Type 3: Secondary adult curves: (a) In the context of an oblique pelvis, for instance, due to a leg length discrepancy or hip pathology or as a secondary curve in idiopathic, neuromuscular and congenital scoliosis, or asymmetrical anomalies at the lumbosacral junction; (b) In the context of a metabolic bone disease (mostly osteoporosis) combined with asymmetric arthritic disease and/or vertebral fractures. Sometimes it is difficult to decide, what exactly the primary cause of the curve was, once it has significantly progressed. However, once an asymmetric load or degeneration occurs, the pathomorphology and pathomechanism in adult scoliosis predominantly located in the lumbar or thoracolumbar spine is quite predictable. Asymmetric degeneration leads to increased asymmetric load and therefore to a progression of the degeneration and deformity, as either scoliosis and/or kyphosis. The progression of a curve is further supported by osteoporosis, particularly in post-menopausal female patients. The destruction of facet joints, joint capsules, discs and ligaments may create mono- or multisegmental instability and finally spinal stenosis. These patients present themselves predominantly with back pain, then leg pain and claudication symptoms, rarely with neurological deficit, and almost never with questions related to cosmetics. The diagnostic evaluation includes static and dynamic imaging, myelo-CT, as well as invasive diagnostic procedures like discograms, facet blocks, epidural and root blocks and immobilization tests. These tests may correlate with the clinical and the pathomorphological findings and may also offer the least invasive and most rational treatment for the patient. The treatment is then tailored to the specific symptomatology of the patient. Surgical management consists of either decompression, correction, stabilization and fusion procedures or a combination of all of these. Surgical procedure is usually complex and has to deal with a whole array of specific problems like the age and the general medical condition of the patient, the length of the fusion, the condition of the adjacent segments, the condition of the lumbosacral junction, osteoporosis and possibly previous scoliosis surgery, and last but not least, usually with a long history of chronified back pain and muscle imbalance which may be very difficult to be influenced. Although this surgery is demanding, the morbidity cannot be considered significantly higher than in other established orthopaedic procedures, like hip replacement, in the same age group of patients. Overall, a satisfactory outcome can be expected in well-differentiated indications and properly tailored surgical procedures, although until today prospective, controlled studies with outcome measures and pre- and post-operative patient's health status are lacking. As patients, who present themselves with significant clinical problems in the context of adult scoliosis, get older, minimal invasive procedures to address exactly the most relevant clinical problem may become more and more important, basically ignoring the overall deformity and degeneration of the spine.