Biomechanical comparison of anatomic trajectory pedicle screw versus injectable calcium sulfate graft-augmented pedicle screw for salvage in cadaveric thoracic bone

Innovation of Surgical Techniques for Screw Fixation in Patients with Osteoporotic Spine

Osteoporosis is a common disease in elderly populations and is a major public health problem worldwide. It is not uncommon for spine surgeons to perform spinal instrumented fusion surgeries for osteoporotic patients. However, in patients with severe osteoporosis, instrumented fusion may result in screw loosening, implant failure or nonunion because of a poor bone quality and decreased pedicle screw stability as well as increased graft subsidence risk. In addition, revision surgeries to correct failed instrumentation are becoming increasingly common in patients with osteoporosis. Therefore, techniques to enhance the fixation of pedicle screws are required in spinal surgeries for osteoporotic patients. To date, various instrumentation methods, such as a supplemental hook, sublaminar taping and sacral alar iliac screws, and modified screwing techniques have been available for reinforcing pedicle screw fixation. In addition, several materials, including polymethylmethacrylate and hydroxyapatite stick/granules, for insertion into prepared screw holes, can be used to enhance screw fixation. Many biomechanical tests support the effectiveness of these augmentation methods. We herein review the current therapeutic strategies for screw fixation and augmentation methods in the surgical treatment of patients with an osteoporotic spine.

Reinforcement of Percutaneous Pedicle Screw Fixation with Hydroxyapatite Granules in Patients with Osteoporotic Spine: Biomechanical Performance and Clinical Outcomes

In percutaneous pedicle screw (PPS) fixation of the osteoporotic spine, rigid screw fixation obtaining strong stabilization is important for achieving successful treatment outcomes. However, in patients with severe osteoporosis, it is difficult to obtain PPS fixation with sufficient stability. PPS fixation has potential disadvantages with respect to maintaining secure stabilization in comparison to conventional pedicle screw fixation. In PPS fixation, bone grafting to achieve posterior spine fusion is generally not applicable and transverse connectors between the rods cannot be used to reinforce the fixation. Various augmentation methods, including additional hooks, sublaminar bands, and hydroxyapatite (HA) sticks, are available for conventional pedicle screw fixation. On the other hand, there has been no established augmentation method for PPS fixation. Recently, we developed a novel augmentation technique for PPS fixation using HA granules. This technique allows the percutaneous insertion of HA granules into the screw hole along the guidewire prior to insertion of the PPS. We have used this augmentation technique for PPS fixation in various spine surgeries in patients with osteoporosis. In our previous studies, biomechanical analyses demonstrated that PPS fixation was significantly enhanced by augmentation with HA granules in the osteoporotic lumbar spine. Furthermore, augmentation with HA granules was considered to decrease the incidence of screw loosening and implant failure following PPS fixation in patients with osteoporotic spine. In this article, we describe the surgical procedures of the augmentation method using HA granules and summarize our data from the biomechanical analysis of augmentation for PPS fixation. We also review the surgical outcomes of PPS fixation with augmentation using HA granules.

A influência da incompatibilidade do macho de rosca na resistência à extração do parafuso pedicular

Objective  We aimed to study the “in vitro” pullout strength of SpineGuard/Zavation Dynamic Surgical Guidance Z-Direct Screw (DSG Screw, SpineGuard Inc, Boulder, Colorado, USA), a screw designed to be inserted using a direct insertion technique.

Methods  Dynamic Surgical Guidance Screws of 5.5 and 6.5 mm were introduced into polyurethane blocks with a density of 10 PCF (0,16g/cm ³ ). According to the experimental group, screws were inserted without pilot hole, with pilot without tapping, undertapping and line-to-line tapping. Screw pullout tests were performed using a universal test machine after screw insertion into polyurethane blocks.

Results  Screws inserted directly into the polyurethane blocks without pilot hole and tapping showed a statistically higher pullout strength. Insertion of the screw without tapping or with undertapping increases the pullout screw strength compared with line-to-line tapping.

Conclusion  Dynamic Surgical Guidance Screw showed the highest pullout strength after its insertion without pilot hole and tapping.

INFLUENCE OF THE CONGRUENCE OF PILOT HOLE TAPPING ON THE ANCHORAGE OF THE PEDICLE SCREW

ABSTRACT Objectives To observe the influence of the congruence of the tapping of the pilot hole on the anchorage of the pedicle screws. Methods 5.5 and 6.5 mm screws from two vertebral fixation systems (Pedicol and Safe) were inserted into polyurethane blocks. Experimental groups were formed according to the pilot hole preparation: A- drilling with a 2.7 mm drill bit, B- Tapping of the pilot hole with a tap of lesser diameter than the diameter of the screw with a congruent thread design, C- Tapping of the pilot hole with a tap of lesser diameter than the diameter of the screw and an incongruous thread design. The polyurethane blocks with the screws were subjected to a tensile strength test to evaluate the pullout resistance of the screws. Results Using congruent pilot hole tapping of a lesser diameter and congruent thread design increased the pullout resistance of the rough-surface screws (Safe). The screws with a smooth surface (Pedicol) presented greater pullout resistance with tapping of a lesser diameter and incongruous thread design. Conclusions The congruence of the tap used to prepare the pilot hole increased the pullout resistance of the rough-surfaced screws. Level of Evidence III; Therapeutic Study.

Novel augmentation technique of percutaneous pedicle screw fixation using hydroxyapatite granules in the osteoporotic lumbar spine: a cadaveric biomechanical analysis

PURPOSE

Percutaneous pedicle screw (PPS) fixation has been commonly used for various spine surgeries. Rigid PPS fixation is necessary to decrease the incidence of screw loosening in osteoporotic spine. Recently, we have reported biomechanical advantages of augmentation technique using hydroxyapatite (HA) granules for PPS fixation in synthetic bone. However, its biomechanical performance in augmenting PPS fixation for osteoporotic spine has not been fully elucidated. The aim of the present study is to perform a cadaveric biomechanical analysis of PPS fixation augmented with HA granules.

METHODS

Thirty osteoporotic lumbar vertebrae (L1-L5) were obtained from 6 cadavers (3 men and 3 women; age 80 ± 9 years; bone mineral density 73 ± 9 mg/cm³). The maximal pullout strength and maximal insertion torque were compared between the screws inserted into the vertebrae with and without augmentation. In toggle testing, the number of craniocaudal toggle cycles and maximal load required to achieve the 2-mm screw head displacement were also compared.

RESULTS

The maximal pullout strength in the screws augmented with HA granules was significantly greater compared to those without augmentation (p < 0.05). The augmentation significantly increased the maximal insertion torque of the screws (p < 0.05). Moreover, the number of toggle cycles and the maximal load required to reach 2 mm of displacement were significantly higher in the augmented screws (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

The PPS fixation was significantly enhanced by the augmentation with HA granules in the osteoporotic lumbar spine. The PPS fixation augmented with HA granules might decrease the incidence of screw loosening and implant failure in patients with osteoporotic spine.

Clinical Effects and Complications of Pedicle Screw Augmentation with Bone Cement: Comparison of Fenestrated Screw Augmentation and Vertebroplasty Augmentation

Background

Pedicle screw augmentation with bone cement has been experimentally demonstrated to increase the pullout strength. However, the mechanisms of screw loosening are complicated and interacting. Although vertebroplasty augmentation and fenestrated screw augmentation have been compared in many studies, there has been no comparative study on their clinical effects and complications in real clinical settings. We investigated clinical effects of bone cement augmentation of a pedicle screw and differences according to augmentation methods.

Methods

Of the total 241 patients who had osteoporosis and underwent posterior pedicle screw fixation without anterior bone graft between January 2010 and December 2016, 132 patients with ≥2 years of radiological follow-up were included in this retrospective study. The patients were divided into group I (unaugmented) and group II (bone cement augmented). Group II was subdivided into II-S group (solid screw augmented) and II-F group (fenestrated screw augmented). The incidence of screw loosening was compared between groups I and II. Cement leakage, screw loosening, and screw fractures were investigated in the subgroups.

Results

In total, 36 of 71 (52%, group I) unaugmented cases and 96 of 170 (56%, group II) augmented cases were followed up for ≥2 years. Of the total 78 solid screw augmented cases, 42 (56%) were in II-S group; 54 of the total 92 (59%) fenestrated screw augmented cases were in II-F group. Groups I and II were homogenous regarding demographic characteristics; II-S and II-F groups were also homogenous. The incidence of screw loosening was 50.0% (18/36) in group I and 7.3% (7/96) in group II (p < 0.001). Cement leakage developed in 2 of 42 (4.8%) cases in II-S group and in 5 of 54 (9.3%) cases in II-F group (p = 0.462). Screw loosening developed in 6 of 42 (14.3%) cases in II-S group and in 1 of 54 cases (1.9%) in II-F group (p = 0.041). Screw fracture developed in none of 42 cases in II-S group and in 3 of 54 cases (5.6%) in II-F group (p = 0.254).

Conclusions

In osteoporotic patients, bone cement augmentation of a pedicle screw decreased the incidence of screw loosening, and fenestrated screw augmentation was more effective than vertebroplasty augmentation.

Enhancing percutaneous pedicle screw fixation with hydroxyapatite granules: A biomechanical study using an osteoporotic bone model

Introduction

Percutaneous pedicle screw (PPS) can provide internal fixation of the thoracolumbar spine through a minimally invasive surgical procedure. PPS fixation has been widely used to treat various spinal diseases. Rigid fixation of PPS is essential for managing osteoporotic spine in order to prevent the risks of screw loosening and implant failure. We recently developed a novel augmentation method using hydroxyapatite (HA) granules for PPS fixation. The aim of this study was to evaluate the strength and stiffness of PPS fixation augmented with HA granules using an osteoporotic bone model.

Methods

Screws were inserted into uniform synthetic bone (sawbones) with and without augmentation. The uniaxial pullout strength and insertion torque of the screws were evaluated. In addition, each screw underwent cyclic toggling under incrementally increasing physiological loads until 2 mm of screwhead displacement occurred. The maximal pullout strength (N), maximal insertion torque (N·cm), number of toggle cycles and maximal load (N) required to achieve 2-mm screwhead displacement were compared between the screws with and without augmentation.

Results

The maximal pullout strength was significantly stronger for screws with augmentation than for those without augmentation (302 ± 19 N vs. 254 ± 17 N, p < 0.05). In addition, the maximal insertion torque was significantly increased in screws with augmentation compared to those without augmentation (48 ± 4 N·cm vs. 26 ± 5 N·cm, p < 0.05). Furthermore, the number of toggle cycles and the maximal load required to reach 2 mm of displacement were significantly greater in screws with augmentation than in those without augmentation (106 ± 9 vs. 52 ± 10 cycles; 152 ± 4 N vs. 124 ± 5 N, p < 0.05).

Conclusions

Augmentation using HA granules significantly enhanced the rigidity of PPS fixation in the osteoporotic bone model. The present study suggested that novel augmentation with HA granules may be a useful technique for PPS fixation in patients with osteoporotic spine.

Biomechanical analysis of spinal implants with different rod diameters under static and fatigue loads: an experimental study

Spinal implants are commonly used in the treatment of spinal disorders or injuries. However, the biomechanical analyses of them are rarely investigated in terms of both biomechanical and clinical perspectives. Therefore, the main purpose of this study is to investigate the effects of rod diameter on the biomechanical behavior of spinal implants and to make a comparison among them. For this purpose, three spinal implants composed of pedicle screws, setscrews and rods, which were manufactured from Ti6Al4V, with diameters of 5.5 mm, 6 mm and 6.35 mm were used and a bilateral vertebrectomy model was applied to spinal systems. Then, the obtained spinal systems were tested under static tension-compression and fatigue (dynamic compression) conditions. Also, failure analyses were performed to investigate the fatigue behavior of spinal implants. After static tension-compression and fatigue tests, it was found that the yield loads, stiffness values, load carrying capacities and fatigue performances of spinal implants enhanced with increasing spinal rod diameter. In comparison to spinal implants with 5.5 mm rods, the fatigue limits of implants showed 13% and 33% improvements in spinal implants having 6 mm and 6.35 mm rods, respectively. The highest static and fatigue test results were obtained from spinal implants having 6.35 mm rods among the tested implants. Also, it was observed that the increasing yield load and stiffness values caused an increase in the fatigue limits of spinal implants.

Cortical bone trajectory screws used to save failed traditional trajectory screws in the osteoporotic lumbar spine and vice versa: a human cadaveric biomechanical study

OBJECTIVE

Traditional trajectory (TT) screws are widely used in lumbar fixation. However, they may require revision surgery in some instances, especially in patients with osteoporotic spines. Cortical bone trajectory (CBT) screws may potentially be used to rescue a failed TT screw and vice versa in nonosteoporotic spines. This study aimed to investigate whether a CBT screw can salvage a compromised TT screw in osteoporotic lumbar spines and vice versa.

METHODS

A total of 42 vertebrae from 17 cadaveric lumbar spines were obtained. Bone mineral density was measured, and a CBT screw was randomly inserted into one side of each vertebra. A TT screw was then inserted into the contralateral side. The biomechanical properties of the screws were tested to determine their insertional torque, pullout strength, and fatigue performance. After checking the screws for the failure of each specimen, the failed screw track was salvaged with a screw of the opposite trajectory. The specimen was then subjected to the same mechanical tests, and results were recorded. A repeat pullout test on TT and CBT screws was also performed.

RESULTS

When CBT screws were used to rescue failed TT screws, the original torque increased by 50%, an average of 81% of the pullout strength of the initial TT screws was retained, and the fatigue performance was equal to that of the original screws, which were considerably stronger than the loose TT screws-that is, the TT repeat screws/TT screws were 33% of the pullout strength of the initial TT screws. When the TT screws were used to salvage the compromised CBT screws, the TT screws retained 51% of the original torque and 54% of the original pullout strength, and these screws were still stronger than the loose CBT screws-that is, the loose CBT screws retained 12% pullout strength of the initial CBT screws. Fatigue performance and the ratio of the pullout strength considerably decreased between the CBT rescue screws and the original CBT screws but slightly changed between the TT rescue screws and the original TT screws.

CONCLUSIONS

CBT and TT screws can be applied in a revision technique to salvage each other in osteoporotic lumbar spines. Additionally, CBT and TT screws each retain adequate insertional torque, pullout strength, and fatigue performance when used for revision in osteoporotic lumbar spines.

INFLUENCE OF DIAMETER AND GEOMETRY IN THE TAPPING OF THE PILOT HOLE IN PEDICLE SCREWS

ABSTRACT Objective: To evaluate the insertion torque and the pulling force of each screw with different diameters and tap. Methods: Polyurethane blocks with a pilot hole of 2.7 mm were used in the study. An experimental group with 5 blocks was formed, the insertion torque was evaluated with a torque meter, and the pullout strength of each Globus screw of 5.5 mm and 6.5 mm was assessed. Results: The comparison of the insertion torque on the 5.5 mm screws with pilot hole without tapping and with a smaller diameter than that of the screw (4.5 mm) and a different thread, and with the tapping with the same diameter as that of the screw (5.5 mm) and equal or different thread presented a statistical difference with a higher value of the insertion torque in the group in which the tapping was not performed. As for the pulling force of the 5.5 mm screw, the non-tapping of the pilot hole resulted in statistical difference with the same diameter of the screw (5.5 mm) and with a different thread of the screw. The pullout force on the 6.5 mm screw was higher in the group where the pilot hole was not tapped according to the non-parametric Kruskal-Wallis test, with significance level of p <0.05 in the comparison of the groups. Conclusions: Pilot hole tapping reduced insertion torque and pullout resistance of the pedicle screw influencing the fixation with tapping with the same screw diameter and different thread design.

Comparison of the Pullout Strength of Different Pedicle Screw Designs and Augmentation Techniques in an Osteoporotic Bone Model

Study Design

Mechanical study.

Purpose

To compare the pullout strength of different screw designs and augmentation techniques in an osteoporotic bone model.

Overview of Literature

Adequate bone screw pullout strength is a common problem among osteoporotic patients. Various screw designs and augmentation techniques have been developed to improve the biomechanical characteristics of the bone–screw interface.

Methods

Polyurethane blocks were used to mimic human osteoporotic cancellous bone, and six different screw designs were tested. Five standard and expandable screws without augmentation, eight expandable screws with polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) or calcium phosphate augmentation, and distal cannulated screws with PMMA and calcium phosphate augmentation were tested. Mechanical tests were performed on 10 unused new screws of each group. Screws with or without augmentation were inserted in a block that was held in a fixture frame, and a longitudinal extraction force was applied to the screw head at a loading rate of 5 mm/min. Maximum load was recorded in a load displacement curve.

Results

The peak pullout force of all tested screws with or without augmentation was significantly greater than that of the standard pedicle screw. The greatest pullout force was observed with 40-mm expandable pedicle screws with four fins and PMMA augmentation. Augmented distal cannulated screws did not have a greater peak pullout force than nonaugmented expandable screws. PMMA augmentation provided a greater peak pullout force than calcium phosphate augmentation.

Conclusions

Expandable pedicle screws had greater peak pullout forces than standard pedicle screws and had the advantage of augmentation with either PMMA or calcium phosphate cement. Although calcium phosphate cement is biodegradable, osteoconductive, and nonexothermic, PMMA provided a significantly greater peak pullout force. PMMA-augmented expandable 40-mm four-fin pedicle screws had the greatest peak pullout force.

Which salvage fixation technique is best for the failed initial screw fixation at the cervicothoracic junction? A biomechanical comparison study

PURPOSE

The pedicle screw construct is the most widely used technique for instrumentation at cervicothoracic junction (CTJ) because of its high biomechanical stability. However, we may need salvage fixation options for it as there might be a situation when pedicle screw is not available or it initially fails in order to obviate the need to instrument an additional motion segment. We aimed to evaluate the ability of using salvage screw fixations at CTJ (C7, T1, T2), when the initial fixation method fails.

METHODS

Fifteen fresh-frozen cadaveric specimens (C7-T2) were tested for pull-out strength (POS, N) and insertion torque (IT, Nm) of three C7 fixation techniques (lateral mass, pedicle and laminar screw) and three upper thoracic spine instrumentation (pedicle screws with straight trajectory, anatomical trajectory pedicle screws and laminar screw). Data are shown as mean ± standard deviation (SD).

RESULTS

C7 pedicle screws generated statistically greater IT and POS than other C7 fixation techniques (P < 0.05). Similar trends were observed with pedicle fixation as a salvage procedure (P < 0.05). Laminar screws yielded significantly higher POS values than lateral mass fixation when applied as a salvage C7 fixation (mean POS: lateral mass screw-299.4 ± 173.8 N, laminar screw-629.3 ± 216.1, P = 0.013). Significant relationship was established between IT and POS for all screws using Pearson correlation coefficient analysis (r = 0.624, P < 0.01). Pedicle screw with different trajectory (anatomical vs straightforward) did not show any significant difference in terms of POS as the initial and salvage fixation of upper thoracic spine. As a salvage fixation technique, there was no significant difference between laminar screw and a pedicle screw with different trajectory (P > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Laminar screws appear to provide stronger and more reproducible salvage fixation than lateral mass screws for C7 fixation, if pedicle screw should fail. If failure of initial pedicle screw is verified at the upper thoracic spine, both laminar screw and pedicle screw with different trajectory could be an option of salvage fixation. Our results suggest that pedicle screws and laminar screw similarly provide a strong fixation for salvage applications in the cervicothoracic junction.

Biomechanical Investigation of a Novel Revision Device in an Osteoporotic Model: Pullout Strength of Pedicle Screw Anchor Versus Larger Screw Diameter

STUDY DESIGN

In vitro cadaveric biomechanical study.

OBJECTIVE

To assess revision pullout strength of novel anchored screws (AS) versus conventional larger diameter traditional pedicle screws (TPS) in an osteoporotic model.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Pedicle screws are the most ubiquitous method of treating spinal pathologies requiring lumbar fusion. Although these screws are effective in providing 3-column stabilization of the spine, revision surgeries are occasionally necessary, particularly for geriatric and osteoporotic populations. Innovative technologies should be tested to ensure continued improvement in revision techniques.

METHODS

For 4 specimens at L2-L5 (T-score=-3.6±0.54), 6.5-mm-diameter TPS were inserted into left and right pedicles and were pulled out; revision screws were then inserted. Polyether-ether-ketone anchors, designed to expand around a 6.5-mm screw, were inserted into all left pedicles. On the contralateral side, 7.5-mm-diameter TPS were inserted at L2-L3, and 8.5-mm-diameter TPS at L4-L5. Pullout testing was performed at 10 mm/min. The maximum pullout strength and insertion forces were recorded.

RESULTS

The initial average pullout force (6.5-mm screw) was 837 N (±329 N) and 642 N (±318 N) in L2-L3 and L4-L5 left pedicles, and 705 N (±451 N) and 779 N (±378 N) in L2-L3 and L4-L5 right pedicles, respectively. Comparison of revision pullout forces versus initial pullout forces revealed the following: 87% and 63% for AS in L2-L3 and L4-L5 left pedicles, respectively; 56% for 7.5-mm and 93% for 8.5-mm TPS in L2-L3 and L4-L5 right pedicles, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Anchor sleeves with 6.5-mm-diameter pedicle screws provided markedly higher resistance to screw pullout than 7.5-mm-diameter revision screws and fixation statistically equivalent to 8.5-mm-diameter screws, possibly because of medial-lateral expansion within the vertebral space and/or convex filling of the pedicle. AS results had the lowest SD, indicating minimal variability in bone-screw purchase.

Pull out Strength of Dual Outer Diameter Pedicle Screws Compared to Uncemented and Cemented Standard Pedicle Screws: A Biomechanical in vitro Study

OBJECTIVE

To analyze the potential of the dual outer diameter screw and systematically evaluate the pull-out force of the dual outer diameter screw compared to the uncemented and cemented standard pedicle screws with special regard to the pedicle diameter and the vertebra level.

METHODS

Sixty vertebrae of five human spines (T ₆ -L ₅ ) were sorted into three study groups for pairwise comparison of the uncemented dual outer diameter screw, the uncemented standard screw, and the cemented standard screw, and randomized with respect to bone mineral density (BMD) and vertebra level. The vertebrae were instrumented, insertion torque was determined, and pull-out testing was performed using a material testing machine. Failure load was evaluated in pairwise comparison within each study group. The screw-to-pedicle diameter ratio was determined and the uncemented dual outer diameter and standard screws were compared for different ratios as well as vertebra levels.

RESULTS

Significantly increased pull-out forces were measured for the cemented standard screw compared to the uncemented standard screw (+689 N, P < 0.001) and the dual outer diameter screw (+403 N, P < 0.001). Comparing the dual outer diameter screw to the uncemented standard screw in the total study group, a distinct but not significant increase was measured (+149 N, P = 0.114). Further analysis of these two screws, however, revealed a significant increase of pull-out force for the dual outer diameter screw in the lumbar region (+247 N, P = 0.040), as well as for a screw-to-pedicle diameter ratio between 0.6 and 1 (+ 488 N, P = 0.028).

CONCLUSIONS

For clinical application, cement augmentation remains the gold standard for increasing screw stability. According to our results, the use of a dual outer diameter screw is an interesting option to increase screw stability in the lumbar region without cement augmentation. For the thoracic region, however, the screw-to-pedicle diameter should be checked and attention should be paid to screw cut out, if the dual outer diameter screw is considered.

Pull-out strength of cemented solid versus fenestrated pedicle screws in osteoporotic vertebrae

Objectives

Cement augmentation of pedicle screws could be used to improve screw stability, especially in osteoporotic vertebrae. However, little is known concerning the influence of different screw types and amount of cement applied. Therefore, the aim of this biomechanical in vitro study was to evaluate the effect of cement augmentation on the screw pull-out force in osteoporotic vertebrae, comparing different pedicle screws (solid and fenestrated) and cement volumes (0 mL, 1 mL or 3 mL).

Materials and Methods

A total of 54 osteoporotic human cadaver thoracic and lumbar vertebrae were instrumented with pedicle screws (uncemented, solid cemented or fenestrated cemented) and augmented with high-viscosity PMMA cement (0 mL, 1 mL or 3 mL). The insertion torque and bone mineral density were determined. Radiographs and CT scans were undertaken to evaluate cement distribution and cement leakage. Pull-out testing was performed with a material testing machine to measure failure load and stiffness. The paired t-test was used to compare the two screws within each vertebra.

Results

Mean failure load was significantly greater for fenestrated cemented screws (+622 N; p ⩽ 0.001) and solid cemented screws (+460 N; p ⩽ 0.001) than for uncemented screws. There was no significant difference between the solid and fenestrated cemented screws (p = 0.5). In the lower thoracic vertebrae, 1 mL cement was enough to significantly increase failure load, while 3 mL led to further significant improvement in the upper thoracic, lower thoracic and lumbar regions.

Conclusion

Conventional, solid pedicle screws augmented with high-viscosity cement provided comparable screw stability in pull-out testing to that of sophisticated and more expensive fenestrated screws. In terms of cement volume, we recommend the use of at least 1 mL in the thoracic and 3 mL in the lumbar spine.

Cite this article: C. I. Leichtle, A. Lorenz, S. Rothstock, J. Happel, F. Walter, T. Shiozawa, U. G. Leichtle. Pull-out strength of cemented solid versus fenestrated pedicle screws in osteoporotic vertebrae. Bone Joint Res 2016;5:419–426.

Krag versus Caudad trajectory technique for pedicle screw insertion in osteoporotic vertebrae: biomechanical comparison and analysis

STUDY DESIGN

To compare in detail the effects of pedicle screw insertion in osteoporotic vertebrae via Krag and Caudad trajectory techniques.

OBJECTIVE

To compare the biomechanical stability of 2 pedicle screw fixation techniques and to correlate the stability of the pedicle screw with quantitative computed tomography (QCT).

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Pedicle screw fixation is commonly used to facilitate fusion and postoperative rehabilitation. Fixation failure and loosening in the metal-bone interface are frequent, with osteoporosis usually a major factor. Pedicle screw fixation in osteoporotic spines is of particular concern regarding implant failure. Few reports have addressed which fixation method provides better biomechanical strength and thus presents less risk of failure.

METHODS

Eleven cadaveric vertebrae were harvested and subjected to dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry and QCT to assess bone mineral density. Matched, polyaxial pedicle screws were inserted into the left and right pedicles of each vertebra. Screws were randomly assigned to the Caudad or Krag group by right or left side. They were inserted under 3-dimensional navigation system assistance. Cyclic loading tests were performed (maximum load 250 N, 3 Hz, up to 30,000 cycles) while recording load and displacement. Pullout tests were performed if the cyclic loading test was completed. Stiffness quotients were calculated.

RESULTS

Cycle-displacement curves showed more pedicle screw dislodgement in the Krag than the Caudad group (P < 0.01). Initially, stiffness was significantly higher in the Caudad group (P < 0.01), but the difference diminished thereafter. In the Caudad group, bone mineral density measured by QCT was significantly correlated with several biomechanical parameters.

CONCLUSION

Pedicle screws inserted in osteoporotic lumbar vertebrae using the Caudad trajectory displayed significantly higher biomechanical strength than those inserted using the Krag trajectory, especially during early fixation. Stability of pedicle screw fixation using the Caudad trajectory technique can be estimated by QCT.

Cortical screws used to rescue failed lumbar pedicle screw construct: a biomechanical analysis

OBJECT

Cortical trajectory screw constructs, developed as an alternative to pedicle screw fixation for the lumbar spine, have similar in vitro biomechanics. The possibility of one screw path having the ability to rescue the other in a revision scenario holds promise but has not been evaluated. The objective in this study was to investigate the biomechanical properties of traditional pedicle screws and cortical trajectory screws when each was used to rescue the other in the setting of revision.

METHODS

Ten fresh-frozen human lumbar spines were instrumented at L3-4, 5 with cortical trajectory screws and 5 with pedicle screws. Construct stiffness was recorded in flexion/extension, lateral bending, and axial rotation. The L-3 screw pullout strength was tested to failure for each specimen and salvaged with screws of the opposite trajectory. Mechanical stiffness was again recorded. The hybrid rescue trajectory screws at L-3 were then tested to failure.

RESULTS

Cortical screws, when used in a rescue construct, provided stiffness in flexion/extension and axial rotation similar to that provided by the initial pedicle screw construct prior to failure. The rescue pedicle screws provided stiffness similar to that provided by the primary cortical screw construct in flexion/extension, lateral bending, and axial rotation. In pullout testing, cortical rescue screws retained 60% of the original pedicle screw pullout strength, whereas pedicle rescue screws retained 65% of the original cortical screw pullout strength.

CONCLUSIONS

Cortical trajectory screws, previously studied as a primary mode of fixation, may also be used as a rescue option in the setting of a failed or compromised pedicle screw construct in the lumbar spine. Likewise, a standard pedicle screw construct may rescue a compromised cortical screw track. Cortical and pedicle screws each retain adequate construct stiffness and pullout strength when used for revision at the same level.

The effect of increasing pedicle screw size on thoracic spinal canal dimensions: an anatomic study

STUDY DESIGN

Anatomic study.

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether the thoracic spinal canal diameter decreases when the pedicle is allowed to expand with increasing screw diameter. To observe whether osseous breach occurs medially or laterally.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Insertion of a pedicle screw that is larger in diameter than that of the native pedicle has been shown to expand the pedicle and increase biomechanical fixation strength. With this technique, there is concern for medial expansion of the pedicle causing decrease in spinal canal diameter, especially in the concavity of scoliosis, resulting in spinal cord compression. Also, large pedicle screws that are inserted correctly may still cause undetected medial bony breach during surgery.

METHODS

A total of 162 pedicles from 81 thoracic vertebrae (T1-T12) of 7 fresh-frozen adult cadavers were analyzed. After undertapping the pedicle by 1 mm, pedicle screws were inserted in increasing diameter (range, 4.0-9.5 mm) bilaterally until there was an osseous breach in the pedicle. A total of 938 screws were used. Transverse spinal canal diameter and pedicle circumference were measured (in millimeters) before and after each pedicle screw placement. Photographs and fluoroscopic images of representative specimens were obtained for visual assessment.

RESULTS

The average transverse spinal canal diameter was 17.7 mm. The average transverse canal diameter with the largest screw inserted before bony breach was detected was 17.6 mm (P = 0.92). The average diameter of the largest screw inserted before breach was 6.9 mm. Pedicle circumference increased from 41.8 mm before screw placement to 43.4 mm at maximal expansion before bony breach with the next sized screw. Twenty-eight pedicles did not break with 9.5-mm-diameter screws. There were 133 lateral and 1 medial breaches.

CONCLUSION

Increasing pedicle screw size caused pedicle expansion laterally but did not significantly alter transverse spinal canal dimensions. When there was an osseous breach, most were lateral (99.3%).

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

N/A.

Insertional torque and pullout strength of pedicle screws with or without repositioning: a porcine study

PURPOSE. To evaluate the insertion torque and pullout strength of pedicle screws with or without repositioning. METHODS. 20 fresh porcine lumbar vertebrae of similar size were used. The entry point was at the site just lateral and distal to the superior facet joint of the vertebra, and to a depth of 35 mm. A 6.2-mm-diameter, 35-mm-long pedicle screw was inserted parallel to the superior end plate on one side as control. On the other side, an identical screw was first inserted 10º caudal to the superior end plate, and then repositioned parallel to the superior end plate. The insertional torque and pullout strength were measured. RESULTS. Three of the specimens were excluded owing to pedicle fractures during the pullout test. Repositioned pedicle screws were significantly weaker than controls in terms of the maximum insertional torque (3.20 ± 0.28 vs. 2.04 ± 0.28 Nm, 36% difference, p<0.01) and pullout strength (1664 ± 378 vs.1391 ± 295 N, p<0.01). CONCLUSION. Repositioning pedicle screws should be avoided, especially when the pedicle wall is breached. If repositioning is deemed necessary, augmentation with polymethyl methacrylate or a screw with a larger diameter should be considered.

Designs and techniques that improve the pullout strength of pedicle screws in osteoporotic vertebrae: current status

Osteoporosis is a medical condition affecting men and women of different age groups and populations. The compromised bone quality caused by this disease represents an important challenge when a surgical procedure (e.g., spinal fusion) is needed after failure of conservative treatments. Different pedicle screw designs and instrumentation techniques have been explored to enhance spinal device fixation in bone of compromised quality. These include alterations of screw thread design, optimization of pilot hole size for non-self-tapping screws, modification of the implant's trajectory, and bone cement augmentation. While the true benefits and limitations of any procedure may not be realized until they are observed in a clinical setting, axial pullout tests, due in large part to their reproducibility and ease of execution, are commonly used to estimate the device's effectiveness by quantifying the change in force required to remove the screw from the body. The objective of this investigation is to provide an overview of the different pedicle screw designs and the associated surgical techniques either currently utilized or proposed to improve pullout strength in osteoporotic patients. Mechanical comparisons as well as potential advantages and disadvantages of each consideration are provided herein.

Strategy for salvage pedicle screw placement: A technical note

BACKGROUND

Salvage surgery for failed lumbar spine fusion with a loosened pedicle screw is challenging. In general, the strategy includes replacement with larger and longer pedicle screws, augmentation with polymethylmethacrylate cement or hydroxyapatite granules, and extension of fused segments. The purpose of this study is to introduce a new technique for pedicle screw replacement after failed lumbar spine fusion.

METHODS

Five salvage operations were performed using a different trajectory (DT) pedicle screw replacement technique based on 3-dimensional radiological information. Position of the alternative pedicle screws was planned carefully on the computer screen of a computed tomography-based navigation system before the operation. To obtain sufficient initial stability, 1 of 2 techniques was chosen, depending on the patient. One technique created a completely new route, which did not interfere with the existing screw hole, and the other involved penetration of the existing screw hole.

RESULTS

DT pedicle screws were replaced successfully according to the preoperative plan. In all patients, bony union were achieved at the final follow-up period without any instrument failure. Extension of the fused segments could be avoided by using the DT pedicle screw replacement technique combined with transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion.

CONCLUSIONS

The DT pedicle screw replacement technique is a treatment option for salvage lumbar spine surgery.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

The current technique is a treatment option for salvage operations that can both avoid extension of a fused segment and achieve successful bony union.

Comparison of expansive pedicle screw and polymethylmethacrylate-augmented pedicle screw in osteoporotic sheep lumbar vertebrae: biomechanical and interfacial evaluations

Background

It was reported that expansive pedicle screw (EPS) and polymethylmethacrylate-augmented pedicle screw (PMMA-PS) could be used to increase screw stability in osteoporosis. However, there are no studies comparing the two kinds of screws in vivo. Thus, we aimed to compare biomechanical and interfacial performances of EPS and PMMA-PS in osteoporotic sheep spine.

Methodology/Principal Findings

After successful induction of osteoporotic sheep, lumbar vertebrae in each sheep were randomly divided into three groups. The conventional pedicle screw (CPS) was inserted directly into vertebrae in CPS group; PMMA was injected prior to insertion of CPS in PMMA-PS group; and the EPS was inserted in EPS group. Sheep were killed and biomechanical tests, micro-CT analysis and histological observation were performed at both 6 and 12 weeks post-operation. At 6-week and 12-week, screw stabilities in EPS and PMMA-PS groups were significantly higher than that in CPS group, but there were no significant differences between EPS and PMMA-PS groups at two study periods. The screw stability in EPS group at 12-week was significantly higher than that at 6-week. The bone trabeculae around the expanding anterior part of EPS were more and denser than that in CPS group at 6-week and 12-week. PMMA was found without any degradation and absorption forming non-biological “screw-PMMA-bone” interface in PMMA-PS group, however, more and more bone trabeculae surrounded anterior part of EPS improving local bone quality and formed biological “screw-bone” interface.

Conclusions/Significance

EPS can markedly enhance screw stability with a similar effect to the traditional method of screw augmentation with PMMA in initial surgery in osteoporosis. EPS can form better biological interface between screw and bone than PMMA-PS. In addition, EPS have no risk of thermal injury, leakage and compression caused by PMMA. We propose EPS has a great application potential in augmentation of screw stability in osteoporosis in clinic.

Postfusion pullout strength comparison of a novel pedicle screw with classical pedicle screws on synthetic foams

Pullout is a very common failure mode on the use of pedicle screws. Numerous studies were completed to increase the pullout strength of pedicle screws especially for osteoporotic bones. In this study, a previously designed pedicle screw type was tested before and after fusion condition. Synthetic polyurethane foams were used in all tests. Three different grades of foams were used in tests to simulate severely osteoporotic, osteoporotic, and healthy bones. Test blocks were produced and characterized in our clinical biomechanics laboratory. Foaming of polyurethane was accepted as fusion process (bone in growth). Pedicle screw including radial holes (new design) was tested both before and after the fusion. It also exhibited remarkably higher pullout strength after fusion than before fusion and most of other alternatives stated in the literature. In total, 70% higher pullout strength was achieved with new design after fusion. On the other hand, new design did not dominate other alternatives when comparison was carried out on severely osteoporotic and healthy bones. To the knowledge of the authors, this is the first study investigating the postfusion properties on synthetic foams.

The impact of a distal expansion mechanism added to a standard pedicle screw on pullout resistance. A biomechanical study

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

Spinal deformity surgery in elderly patients is associated with an increased risk of implant loosening due to failure at the screw-bone interface. Several techniques can be used to increase the screw anchorage characteristics. Cement-augmented screw fixation was shown to be the most efficient method; however, this technique is associated with a risk of complications related to vertebral cement deposition and leakage. Hence, there is a need to further elaborate the alternative screw augmenting techniques to reduce the indications for bone cement.

PURPOSE

To analyze surgical alternatives to cement augmentation, the present study sought to quantify the impact of a distal expansion mechanism added to a standard pedicle screw on an axial pullout resistance.

STUDY DESIGN

A biomechanical laboratory study on the uniaxial pullout resistance of a standard pedicle screw versus a customized pedicle screw with a distal expansion mechanism.

METHODS

A total of 40 vertebrae from seven fresh-frozen human specimens were harvested and subjected to a computed tomography scanning and an analysis of the bone mineral density (BMD). The vertebrae were instrumented with a standard 6.0-mm pedicle screw and a modified 6.0-mm pedicle screw with a distal expansion mechanism added. The actual working length of both screws inside the vertebrae was identical. The distal expansion mechanism made up one-fifth of the shaft length. The accuracy of the screw insertion was assessed using biplanar radiographs and by inspection. Analysis of resistance to pullout was performed by a coaxial alignment of the pedicle screws and attachment to an electromechanical testing machine. The pullout rate was 5 mm/min, and the load-displacement curve was recorded until the force of the pullout resistance peaked. The peak load-to-failure was measured in Newtons and reported as the ultimate failure load. With each test, the mode of failure was noted and analyzed descriptively.

RESULTS

A total of 17 vertebrae with matched pairs of standard and expansion pedicle screws were eligible for the final statistical analysis. The BMD of the vertebrae tested was 0.67±0.19 g/cm³. The screw length was 50 mm, and the actual working length of both screws was 40.3±4.2 mm. The ultimate failure load of the standard screw was 773.8±529.4 N and that of the expansion screw was 910.3±488.3 N. Statistical analysis revealed a strong trend toward an increased failure load with the expansion screw (p=.06). The mean increase of the ultimate failure load was 136.5±350.4 N. Abrupt vertebral fracture at the vertebral body-pedicle junction and the pedicle occurred seven times with the expansion screw and only five times with the standard screw (p=.16).

CONCLUSIONS

Our study indicates that adding a distal expansion mechanism to a standard pedicle screw increases the failure load by one-fifth. Modern expansion screws might offer an intermediate solution for the augmentation of screw-rod constructs in osteoporotic bone while reducing the need for cement-augmented screws and avoiding the related risks.

A comparative study on screw loosening in osteoporotic lumbar spine fusion between expandable and conventional pedicle screws

INTRODUCTION

The aim of this study is to compare the rate of screw loosening and clinical outcomes of expandable pedicle screws (EPS) with those of conventional pedicle screws (CPS) in patients treated for spinal stenosis (SS) combined with osteoporosis.

METHODS

One hundred and fifty-seven consecutive patients with SS received either EPS fixation (n = 80) or CPS fixation (n = 77) to obtain lumbosacral stabilization. Patients were observed for a minimum of 24 months. Outcome measures included screw loosening, fusion rate, Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) scores and Oswestry disability index (ODI) scoring system, and complications.

RESULTS

In the EPS group, 20 screws became loose (4.1%) in 6 patients (7.5%), and two screws (0.4%) had broken. In the CPS group, 48 screws became loose (12.9%) in 15 patients (19.5%), but no screws were broken. The fusion rate in the EPS group (92.5%) was significantly higher than that of the CPS group (80.5%). The rate of screw loosening in the EPS group (4.1%) was significantly lower than that of the CPS group (12.9%). Six EPS (1.8%) screws were removed. In the EPS group, two screws had broken but without neural complications. Twelve months after surgeries, JOA and ODI scores in the EPS group were significantly improved. There were four cases of dural tears, which healed after corresponding treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

EPS can decrease the risk of screw loosening and achieve better fixation strength and clinical results in osteoporotic lumbar spine fusion.

Design and biomechanical testing of pedicle screw for osteoporotic incidents

In this study, geometrical features of pedicle screws have been modified and their performances are compared. Performance analysis has been made in terms of pull-out strength and torsional strength. The parameters investigated are core diameter, holes drilled normal to screw axis, angle between sequential holes and distance between holes. Three different core diameter have been studied, which are 4 mm (normal core diameter), 5 mm (medium core diameter) and 5.5 mm (high core diameter). Distance between sequential holes has been arranged such that there is either one hole per pitch or one hole per two pitches. Angle between sequential holes is either 90° or 120°. According to the test results, the screw, with medium core diameter (5 mm) containing one hole per two pitches with 90° angle between sequential holes, has exhibited the optimum performance considering torsional strength and pull-out strength requirements. Its torsional strength is slightly higher than and, when Grade 40 polyurethane foam was used as bone simulating material, its pull-out strength is as good as, an undrilled normal core diameter screw, which is already being used in surgical operations. The fatigue performance of this best performed screw has also been found satisfactory according to the related standard. Its pull-out strength is also tested on a calf vertebra and a promising result has been obtained.

Design and performance of spinal fixation pedicle screw system

Pedicle screw-rod bilateral constructions are extensively used in spinal fixation. In this study, the common cause for failure of bilateral constructions has been determined to be the high stress concentration at the rod–setscrew interface. In order to overcome this problem, a design modification has been made by using a supplementary part (shoe) between rod and setscrew. Performance comparison of the conventional design and modified design has been done by conducting static tests. Design modification has resulted in 11%, 27%, 42% and 31% improvements in axial gripping capacity, torsional gripping capacity, flexion/extension resistance and subassembly compression strength, respectively. The most outstanding achievement has been obtained in the fatigue life, which was extended by almost three times.

Biomechanical comparison of different techniques in primary spinal surgery in osteoporotic cadaveric lumbar vertebrae: expansive pedicle screw versus polymethylmethacrylate-augmented pedicle screw

INTRODUCTION

Transpedicular fixation can be challenging in the osteoporotic spine. Expansive pedicle screw (EPS) and polymethylmethacrylate-augmented pedicle screw (PMMA-PS) were both used to increase screw stability. However, there are a little or no biomechanical comparisons of EPS and PMMA-PS, especially in primary spinal surgery in osteoporotic vertebrae. The purpose of this study was to compare the stability of EPS and PMMA-PS in primary spinal surgery.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Fifteen osteoporotic vertebrae were randomly divided into three groups. The conventional pedicle screw (CPS) was inserted in CPS group, the pilot hole was filled with PMMA followed by CPS insertion in PMMA-PS group, and EPS was inserted in EPS group. Twenty-four hours later, X-ray and CT examination and biomechanical tests were performed to all vertebrae.

RESULTS

In PMMA-PS group, PMMA existed in bone tissue around the CPS in both vertebral body and pedicle of vertebral arch, and PMMA surrounding the screw formed a spindle-shaped structure in vertebral body. In EPS group, anterior part of EPS presented an obvious expansion in vertebral body and formed a clawlike structure. Screw stabilities in PMMA-PS and EPS groups were significantly enhanced compared with those in CPS group (P < 0.05). However, there was no significant difference between PMMA-PS and EPS groups (P > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Expansive pedicle screw can markedly enhance screw stability with a similar effect to the traditional method of screw augmentation with PMMA in primary surgery in osteoporotic vertebrae. In addition, EPS can overcome pedicle fracture, leakage and compression caused by lager screw and augmentation with PMMA. We propose that EPS is an effective, safe and easy method and has a great application potential in augmentation of screw stability in osteoporosis in clinic.

Biomechanical analysis of pedicle screws in osteoporotic bone with bioactive cement augmentation using simulated in vivo multicomponent loading

STUDY DESIGN

Biomechanical analysis of bioactive cements augmenting pedicle screw resistance to loosening in osteoporotic synthetic bone.

OBJECTIVE

To simulate in vivo loading-loosening of pedicle screws in osteoporotic vertebrae; and to compare biomechanical efficacy of the following bioactive cements: calcium phosphate (CP), calcium sulfate (CS), and proprietary mixture (M).

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Pedicle screw instrumentation in osteoporotic spines is limited by poor bone-screw interface strength, resulting in screw loosening fixation failure. Previous in vivo studies evaluated augmented pedicle screw resistance to pure pullout, not simulating in vivo loading/failure.

METHODS

A pedicle screw-instrumented osteoporotic thoracic vertebra subjected to combined pullout, transverse, moment loading was simulated. Unconstrained 3-dimensional screw motion relative to vertebra was optically measured during quasi-static, and dynamic loading.

RESULTS

Augmented groups (CP, CS, M) produced (P < 8.0E-07) higher quasi-static failure initiation force (61.2,45.6, 40.3 N) than those by the nonaugmented group (21.0 N), with no significant difference in small screw displacement up to these loads. Nonaugmented screw motion after failure initiation was primarily rotation (toggle-migration) with minimal pullout until the screw tip contacted the superior endplate, followed by more prominent screw pullout. Augmented screw motion (with cement remaining intact on screw) was similar, but with eventual bone fracture anterior to the pedicle region. Dynamic loading produced similar failure initiation force and screw motion.

CONCLUSION

We believe our test protocol produced screw loosening failure similar to that observed clinically, and that it has the ability to detect differences in failure initiation force and failure modes to compare short-term efficacy of screw augmentation techniques. All cements improved screw resistance to failure. The CP > CS > M failure initiation force (P < 0.006) was because of differences in cement distribution. Animal studies may be required to characterize the remodeling activity of bioactive cements and their longer term efficacies.

Biomechanical evaluation of fixation strength of conventional and expansive pedicle screws with or without calcium based cement augmentation

BACKGROUND

The expansive pedicle screw was originally developed to be installed in the bone of compromised quality, but there are some concerns whether it can provide enough fixation strength in the spine with osteoporosis or severe osteoporosis.

METHODS

Twelve fresh human cadaver spines were stratified into four levels: normal, osteopenia, osteoporosis and severe osteoporosis. The vertebra was bilaterally instrumented with pedicle screws according to four protocols, including conventional pedicle screw without augmentation, expansive pedicle screw without augmentation, conventional screw with augmentation and expansive screw with augmentation. Screw pullout tests were conducted.

FINDINGS

Given the same specimen, the fixation strength of expansive screw was significantly higher than that of the conventional screw. When the same type of screw was used, the fixation strength of the calcium based cement augmented group was stronger than that of the non-augmented group. The pullout strength and stiffness of the expansive screw, augmented conventional screw and augmented expansive screw groups at the osteoporotic level were comparable to those of the conventional pedicle screw group at the osteopenic level. However, under the severely osteoporotic bone environment, the pullout strength of pedicle screw with whatever placement protocol was significantly lower than that of the conventional screw group at the osteopenic level.

INTERPRETATION

Our results demonstrate that (i) the expansive pedicle screw appears feasible and safe in either osteopenic or osteoporotic spine; (ii) calcium based cement augmentation can offer improved initial fixation strength of pedicle screws.; and (iii) no screw placement protocol we examined is efficacious in the bone at the severely osteoporotic level.

Revision of cannulated and perforated cement-augmented pedicle screws: a biomechanical study in human cadavers

STUDY DESIGN

Biomechanical investigation of primary and revised cement-augmented pedicle screws in comparison with unaugmented screws.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate revision of cannulated pedicle screws and investigate cement-augmented and nonaugmented screws biomechanically, testing the torque of primary screws and axial pullout force of revised screws in cadaver vertebrae.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Cement augmentation increases the pullout force and stability of pedicle screws in vertebrae with low bone mineral density, but surgeons are concerned about complications during revision.

METHODS

Bone mineral density was measured using quantitative computed tomography (CT) in 23 osteoporotic thoracolumbar junction vertebrae from human cadavers. Cannulated pedicle screws, augmented with bone cement (on right) or unaugmented (left), were inserted into each vertebra. After CT control, extraction torque was measured and the pedicles were reinstrumented with larger-diameter screws. The right screws were augmented again, with another CT control, before pullout testing.

RESULTS

Mean vertebral bone density was 52.6 mg/cm. No major screw malpositioning was observed on primary CTs. Cement leakage was observed anterolaterally and into the spinal canal. Mean maximal torque in augmented screws (1.2 Nm, SD: 0.6) differed significantly from nonaugmented screws (0.8 Nm, SD: 0.6). Screw removal did not lead to vertebral destruction. No relevant changes due to positioning or leakage were observed on CT after revision procedures compared with primary findings. Maximal pullout force in revised augmented screws (713.2 N, SD: 254.6) differed significantly compared with nonaugmented screws (554.0 N, SD: 296.5). Bone damage was observed in several vertebrae during pullout force testing in augmented screws.

CONCLUSION

Revision of cement-augmented pedicle screws was feasible without bone destruction, and larger-diameter screws can be used in revision procedures. The pullout force after revision was significantly better in cement-augmented screws. During pullout testing, the cement-bone interface broke before the screw-cement interface in several vertebrae, fracturing the pedicles.

Dislocation of an S-ROM total hip arthroplasty secondary to traumatic femoral stem dissociation from the metaphyseal sleeve

Modular total hip arthroplasty component dissociation has been reported. We describe a case of recurrent instability secondary to femoral stem dissociation from the proximal metaphyseal sleeve and resultant traumatic retroversion of the neck. Femoral stem revision was necessary for treatment of this rare complication.

Biomechanical analysis of different techniques in revision spinal instrumentation: larger diameter screws versus cement augmentation

STUDY DESIGN

Biomechanical analysis.

OBJECTIVE

To determine the relative strengths of 2 different forms of revision spinal instrumentation using a validated, constant load, cyclic testing mechanism.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Spinal fusion with instrumentation procedures are on the rise. As such, so are revision procedures. A few studies have looked at revision instrumentation techniques. Both increased pedicle screw diameter as well as cement augmentation of pedicle screw fixation have been proposed, used clinically and tested biomechanically. To our knowledge, no comparative study exists between these techniques.

METHODS

Using an instron servohydraulic loading machine, we tested pedicle screws inserted in both the anatomic (angled) and Roy-Camille (straight) insertion technique with both larger diameter (8 mm) pedicle screws, as well as standard diameter (6 mm) pedicle screws augmented with polymethylmethacrylate bone cement. Each of these techniques was subjected to constant load under cyclic conditions for 2000 cycles at 2 Hz. Computerized data collection was used at all time points. Comparisons were made between primary instrumentation data (previously published) and large diameter screws for revision. Further comparisons were made between large diameter screws and cement augmented screws.

RESULTS

The larger diameter screws compared with the cement augmented screws showed significant differences in: initial stiffness with straight insertion technique (P < 0.01), stiffness damage with straight insertion technique (P < 0.01), and creep damage with straight insertion technique (P = 0.01). There was also a significant difference between large diameter and primary instrumentation technique all calculated values (P <or= 0.05).

CONCLUSION

The larger diameter screws were equivocal or significantly more resilient than the cement augmented standard diameter screws at the strongest of the insertion angles for all values. Since rigidity of the instrumentation construct is one of the very few factors that is surgeon controlled, this could influence the choice of instrumentation in revision spinal arthrodesis.

Augmentation of pedicle screw fixation strength using an injectable calcium sulfate cement: an in vivo study

STUDY DESIGN

An in vivo landrace model of cement augmentation of pedicle screw was established, and axial pull-out tests and histological analysis were performed.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the long-term in vivo biomechanical performance of pedicle screws augmented with calcium sulfate cement.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Little information is available on the long-term biomechanical performance of pedicle screws augmented with calcium sulfate cement in vivo.

METHODS

Ten pedicle screws were implanted into the lumbar vertebrae of 15 adult females landraces weighing 105 to 115 kg. The pedicle screws were augmented with Polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA), augmented with the calcium sulfate cement, or not augmented. The landraces were randomized into 3 study periods of day 1, 6 weeks, and 12 weeks. At the end of the assigned study periods, the animals were killed and axial pull-out tests and histological analyses were conducted on the isolated specimen vertebrae.

RESULTS

No significant difference was found among the 1-day, 6-week,and 12-week control group (P > 0.18), no significant difference was found among the 1-day, 6-week and 12-week PMMA group (P > 0.59), and no significant difference was found among the 1-day, 6-week and 12-week calcium sulfate group (P > 0.27). The maximum POS of the PMMA groups was significantly greater than that of the calcium sulfate groups (P < 0.002), the maximum POS of the calcium sulfate groups was significantly greater than that of the control groups (P < 0.004). Histologically progressive absorption of the calcium sulfate was evident. The bone walls around the screws in the 12-week calcium sulfate group were statistically significantly thicker than that of the 12-week control group and that of the 12-week PMMA group.

CONCLUSION

Results of this study demonstrate that the injectable calcium sulfate cement can significantly improve the immediate POS of pedicle screw fixation, and this effect can be maintained even if the calcium sulfate cement has been absorbed completely, which may result from that the calcium sulfate cement resorption paralleled bone ingrowth.

Polymethylmethacrylate augmentation of pedicle screw for osteoporotic spinal surgery: a novel technique

STUDY DESIGN

A retrospective study to evaluate the clinical results of patients with osteoporosis and various spinal diseases treated surgically with polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) augmented pedicle screw.

OBJECTIVE

To report a novel technique using PMMA for pedicle screw augmentation in osteoporotic spinal surgery.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Many studies have proved that the stiffness and strength of pedicle screw fixation can be significantly increased when the pedicle screw is augmented with various cements. However, most of those studies were experimental. Clinical reports using those materials for pedicle screw augmentation are rare and a practical and reliable technique for primary pedicle screw augmentation with cement has not yet been established.

METHODS

Forty-one patients [23 female, 18 male, mean age 75.1 (50-90) years] with osteoporosis and various spinal diseases underwent spinal decompression and instrumentation with PMMA augmentation of pedicle screw. Pre-and postoperative scores for visual analogue scale for pain and Oswestry disability index questionnaire were analyzed. The screw migration, which is the distance from the screw tip to the anterior cortex and upper endplate of vertebra, was also evaluated immediately after the operation and at the mean 22.3 months final follow-up. RESULTS.: Totally 291 of 300 screws were augmented with PMMA. There was neither neurologic deterioration nor symptomatic cement leakage after surgery. The mean visual analogue scale pain score of these patients improved from 9.2 to 1.5 (P < 0.01) and the functional Oswestry disability index score improved from 77.5% to 44.2% (P < 0.01). Kyphotic deformity was improved from average 23.2 degrees to 11.9 degrees after surgery, and to 14.9 degrees at final follow-up (P < 0.01). The average loss of kyphosis correction was 3 degrees. There was no significant screw migration when the screws distances just after operation and at the final follow-up were compared (P > 0.01).

CONCLUSION

The presented technique of PMMA for augmentation of pedicle screw is a safe, reliable, and practical technique for osteoporotic patients who also had various spinal diseases and need spinal instrumentation.