Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic research in the intensive care unit: an unmet need

Comparison of Glycemic Control between Continuous Regular Insulin Infusion and Single-dose Subcutaneous Insulin Glargine Injection in Medical Critically Ill Patients

Background and Aims:

This study aimed to compare glycemic control between continuous intravenous regular insulin infusion and single-dose subcutaneous insulin glargine injection in medical critically ill patients.

Subjects and Methods:

A prospective noninferiority study was conducted in medical critically ill patients who developed hyperglycemia and required regular insulin infusion by the Intensive Care Unit glycemic control protocol. The eligible patients were switched from the daily regular insulin requirement to single-dose subcutaneous insulin glargine injection by a 100% conversion dose. Arterial blood glucose was checked every 2 h for 24 h. Success cases were blood glucose levels of 80–200 mg/dL during the study period. The mean time-averaged area under the curves (AUCs) of blood glucose levels between the two types of insulin were compared by t-test.

Results:

Of 20 cases, 14 cases (70%) were successful. The mean time-averaged AUCs of blood glucose levels between the two types of insulin were not significantly different (155.91 ± 27.54 mg/dL vs. 151.70 ± 17.07 mg/dL, P = 0.56) and less than the predefined noninferior margin. No severe hypoglycemic cases were detected during the study period.

Conclusions:

Single-dose subcutaneous insulin glargine injection was feasibly applied for glycemic control in medical critically ill patients. The glycemic control in the critically ill patients by a single dose of subcutaneous insulin glargine was comparable to standard intravenous regular insulin infusion. A conversion dose of 100% of the daily requirement of regular insulin is suggested.

The pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of cisatracurium in critically ill patients with severe sepsis

AIM

To characterize the pharmacokinetics (PK) and pharmacodynamics (PD) of cisatracurium in critically ill patients with severe sepsis.

METHODS

Blood samples were collected before and over 8 h after a single bolus dose of cisatracurium 0.1 mg kg(-1) . Neuromuscular block was assessed by accelerometric peripheral nerve stimulation (TOF Watch). Plasma concentration and neuromuscular block data were fitted using population analysis.

RESULTS

Steady-state volume of distribution was determined to be 111 ± 71 ml kg(-1) and plasma clearance was 5.2 ± 1.8 ml min(-1) kg(-1) in these patients with greater inter-patient variability compared with other populations. The time to maximum block (8.3 ± 2.9 min) and delay time of transferring from central to effect compartment (17.2 min) was much longer, while the maximum block (95.0 ± 6.3%) was less compared with those in other patient populations. The effect compartment concentration resulting in 50% of maximum effect (128 ± 58 ng ml(-1)) was larger than previously described.

CONCLUSIONS

This study suggests that standard dosing of cisatracurium in patients with severe sepsis results in a slower patient response with a reduced effect. Use of a larger dose may overcome this reduced delayed response.

Off-label medication use in adult critical care patients

PURPOSE

This study evaluated the use of off-label medications in the intensive care unit (ICU) setting and their varying levels of evidence.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Thirty-seven ICUs from 24 US sites participated in this prospective, multicenter, observational study during a single 24-hour period. All medication orders were evaluated for Food and Drug Administration-labeled indications, strength of evidence, and strength of recommendation. Off-label medication orders were evaluated for indication, dose, route of administration, duration of therapy, and whether they were supported by institutional guidelines.

RESULTS

A total of 414 patients were enrolled, yielding 5237 medication orders for analysis. Of these, 1897 orders (36.2%) were off-label. The 3 drug classes that accounted for the most off-label orders were bronchorespiratory, gastrointestinal, and immunology. The majority of off-label medication orders (89.1%) were initiated after patient admission to the ICU. Nine hundred twenty-eight (48.3%) of the off-label medication orders had grade C or no evidence.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of off-label medication therapies in the US adult critical care units is common, a majority of which are initiated after admission to the ICU and a significant portion of which are supported with inferior levels of evidence.

Pain may be inevitable; inadequate management is not

Assessing and managing pain in the critically ill patient is challenging. Reproducible and clinically applicable pain measurement scales have yet to be validated and ubiquitously applied in the intensive care unit setting. Critical care clinicians, both physicians and nurses, should thoughtfully monitor their patient's pain level, periodically reassess their practice and critically evaluate the efficacy of pharmacological and nonpharmacological analgesic interventions.

Pharmacogenetics and paediatric drug development: issues and consequences to labelling and dosing recommendations

The area of pharmacogenetics (PGt) is evolving rapidly. However, ongoing efforts in this field are not aligned with the requirements for the inclusion of clinically relevant findings into the label, especially with reference to paediatric indications. Clinical research in children poses unique issues from a practical and technical perspective, but many challenges can be overcome by applying advanced study design and data analysis methods. When investigating the role of PGt factors on treatment effect, all features that influence drug response must be taken into account. Yet, PGt often has a privileged status in research protocols, with PGt factors evaluated independently from other determinants of response, instead of being regarded as other demographic or clinical covariates (e.g., age, renal function). At present, guidelines to incorporate PGt findings into label statements are lacking in part because this is a new and incompletely understood area. This situation is no longer acceptable. To achieve the potential that PGt can offer to drug development and ultimately to drug prescription, academia, industry and regulatory agencies need to pool resources on the revision of study design and data analysis requisites, bringing in model-based methodologies to enable accurate interpretation of results and provide appropriate labelling recommendations.