Nonpharmacologic Approaches for the Treatment of Hyperlipidemia

Preventing Early Cardiovascular Death in Patients With Familial Hypercholesterolemia

Familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) is an autosomal dominant disorder resulting in severe elevation of total and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels. There are more than 600,000 individuals in the United States with FH. Individuals with FH tend to experience premature cardiovascular disease and often die from sudden cardiac death at a young age. Statins alone or in combination with other lipid-lowering medications are effective in managing FH and preventing cardiovascular events. For patients who do not respond to or are intolerant of pharmacotherapy, low-density lipoprotein apheresis is available as a nonpharmacologic treatment option. Despite the prevalence of FH, it is undiagnosed and untreated in the majority of patients. Screening, combined with appropriate drug therapy, can save lives. The authors review the screening, diagnosis, and management of FH.

Severe hypercholesterolaemia: therapeutic goals and eligibility criteria for LDL apheresis in Europe

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Despite the use of currently available lipid-lowering therapies, a significant proportion of patients with severe hypercholesterolaemia do not reach treatment goals and consequently remain at increased risk for cardiovascular disease (CVD). On the basis of clinical experience, these patients tend to have the most severe forms of familial hypercholesterolaemia or markedly elevated LDL cholesterol (LDL-C) levels but are unable to tolerate statin therapy.

RECENT FINDINGS

LDL apheresis is currently the best treatment option (or treatment rescue) to bring these patients closer to therapeutic LDL objectives, and has been shown to reduce the risk of CVD along with LDL-C levels. However, criteria for LDL apheresis eligibility and the percentage of patients receiving treatment vary widely from country to country across Europe. Despite the proven benefits of LDL apheresis, access to this procedure remains limited because of its high cost and low availability, reflecting inherent limitations of this treatment modality.

SUMMARY

There is a need to both better define the patient population eligible for LDL apheresis and to create unified European guidelines governing the use of apheresis. In addition to improving access to apheresis where appropriate, new therapies are needed to further decrease LDL-C and reduce the ongoing CVD risk in patients with severe hypercholesterolaemia.

Lowering LDL cholesterol in adults: a prospective, community-based practice initiative

PURPOSE

The purpose of our study was to see if a clinic-wide initiative, with low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL)-lowering interventions, could be an effective health maintenance strategy to decrease LDL levels to <100 mg/dL in a community-based, internal medicine outpatient setting.

METHODS

There were 1375 patients screened with an initial/baseline LDL (LDL(1)) measurement. Patients whose LDL(1) levels were >100 mg/dL were put on a lipid-lowering action plan and re-evaluated with a follow-up LDL (LDL(2)) in 3-4 months. An additional action plan was given to patients whose LDL(2) values were still too high, and their values retested in 3-4 months for a third LDL (LDL(3)). LDL(1) levels versus postintervention LDL measurement (LDL(2) or LDL(3)) levels were the primary endpoints, with secondary endpoints of total cholesterol, total triglyceride, and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL) levels over the 3 measurement periods.

RESULTS

Of 514 patients who were given action plans, 443 returned for their follow-up lipid assessment. LDL levels in this group fell from 140.7 +/- 29.2 (mean+/-1 SD) mg/dL (LDL(1)) to 110.9 (29.6) mg/dL (LDL(2)) (P <.05). Of these 443 patients, 167 individuals had LDL(2) levels that now met National Cholesterol Education Program/Third Adult Treatment Panel III guidelines (<100 mg/dL) and 87 were now considered by their primary care provider as controlled (LDL 100-130 mg/dL). However, 158 individuals had LDL(2) levels that were either not controlled or not meeting National Cholesterol Education Program/Third Adult Treatment Panel guidelines. These 158 patients were provided with a second action plan, and of these, 50 (32%) returned to the clinic for a third lipid panel. Their LDLs, as a group, subsequently fell from an LDL(2) of 139.9 (24.4) mg/dL to 112.5 (28.2) mg/dL (LDL(3)) (P <.05). Sixteen of 50 now had LDLs <100 mg/dL, and 26 of 50 were considered controlled. Initial HDL (HDL(1)) levels rose from 55.4 (17.2) mg/dL to 57.3 (14.6) mg/dL (HDL(2)) (n=443). Blood levels of triglycerides and cholesterol also decreased in our returning patients over this time period (P <.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Community-based physicians can help their patients realize significant reductions in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels by implementing and closely monitoring lipid-lowering initiatives for their patients, resulting in potentially large positive impacts on the long-term health and well-being of their patients.

LDL-apheresis therapy

Low-density lipoprotein (LDL)-apheresis is an effective means for acutely lowering plasma cholesterol (LDL reduction > 60%) and reducing cardiovascular events in patients with uncontrolled hypercholesterolemia who are genetically predisposed or resistant to standard therapy. Despite its known benefit, apheresis is performed in only a minority of qualified patients. In addition to reducing plasma cholesterol, apheresis can alter other markers of vascular disease (inflammation, rheology, thrombosis, and fibrinolysis). The acute and chronic changes to the vascular system may warrant LDL-apheresis use in other diseases.