Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome in athletes

[The electrophysiology of Wolff-Parkinson-White in the asymptomatic patient with activity or with high professional risk]

OBJECTIVE

Describe the electrophysiological characteristics in subjects with asymptomatic Wolff-Parkinson-White with sports activities or high professional responsibility.

METHODS

Nineteen subjects, mean age 33 ± 13 years (group A). The electrophysiological characteristics were compared with a matched group with symptomatic WPW (group B).

RESULTS

At baseline the anterograde refractory period and the anterograde conduction 1:1 over the accessory pathway were longer in group A (300 ± 48 ms vs 262 ± 32 ms, p < 0.05 and 355 ± 108 ms vs 307 ± 86 ms, p < 0.05), respectively. None of group A had a anterograde refractory period< 250 ms and 58% showed absence of retrograde conduction over the accessory pathway vs 4% of group B (p < 0.001). Induction of tachycardia was significantly less in group A (5%) than in group B (92%) (p < 0.001). Atrial fibrillation was induced in only one of group A vs 32% of group B (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

We confirm the benign electrophysiological characteristics in asymptomatic compared to symptomatic subjects. Poor anterograde conduction along with absence of retrograde conduction explains the low frequency of tachyarrhythmias and would not support the routine investigation of all asymptomatic subjects. But, due to possible consequences, remains the systematic indication for preventive ablation in the subgroup of asymptomatic subjects with sporting activities or high professional responsibility.

When should we recommend catheter ablation for patients with the Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Catheter ablation has been proven as very effective and safe therapy for patients with symptomatic Wolff-Parkinson-White (WPW) syndrome. Its application in asymptomatic individuals with WPW pattern remains controversial. This review will elaborate on the role of catheter ablation in symptomatic and asymptomatic patients with WPW pattern on ECG.

RECENT FINDINGS

Several recent prospective studies evaluated invasive risk stratification followed by prophylactic catheter ablation in asymptomatic patients with WPW pattern. Inducibility of arrhythmias in these patients during invasive electrophysiological study was shown to predict the development of future symptomatic arrhythmias. Although ablation of accessory pathways performed in 'inducible' patients decreased the incidence of subsequent symptomatic arrhythmias, the studies were not powered to detect a reduction in life-threatening arrhythmias.

SUMMARY

Radiofrequency catheter ablation remains the first-line therapy for patients with symptomatic WPW syndrome. Invasive electrophysiological study and possible ablation of accessory pathway may be offered to well informed asymptomatic individuals with WPW if they are willing to trade the very small risk of subsequent sudden death or incapacity for a small immediate procedural risk of serious complications or death. Asymptomatic patients may require invasive risk stratification and possible catheter ablation for important social or professional reasons.