Root Canal Treatment in a Population-Based Adult Sample: Status of Teeth After Endodontic Treatment

Prediction of accessory canals on the apical third of mandibular second molar based on micro-computed tomography

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to investigate the anatomical factors influencing the incidence of accessory canals (ACs) in the apical third of the mandibular second molar in Chinese population.

METHODS

Micro-CT was performed on 86 root canals. The five possible factors influencing the incidence of ACs in the apical third were named X1 to X5. These factors were the canal length of the apical third, fused roots, location of apical foramen, curvature of the root canals, and complexity of the canals. Statistical analysis was performed by the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator, receiver operating characteristic curve, and the χ2 test (α = 0.05).

RESULTS

The selected variables in the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator regression model were fused roots and complex root canals. The area under the curve was 0.737, indicating that the model had a certain predictive ability. ACs were mainly distributed in the buccal wall and mesial wall of root canals in the apical third of molars (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

For Chinese population, fused roots and complex root canals are anatomical factors influencing ACs in the apical one-third of mandibular second molars, and the ACs mainly occur in the buccal wall and mesial wall of the root canal.

Root Canal Treatment Survival Analysis in National Dental PBRN Practices

Few studies have examined the longevity of endodontically treated teeth in nonacademic clinical settings where most of the population receives its care. This study aimed to quantify the longevity of teeth treated endodontically in general dentistry practices and test the hypothesis that longevity significantly differed by the patient's age, gender, dental insurance, geographic region, and placement of a crown and/or other restoration soon after root canal treatment (RCT). This retrospective study used deidentified data of patients who underwent RCT of permanent teeth through October 2015 in 99 general dentistry practices in the National Dental Practice-Based Research Network (Network). The data set included 46,702 patients and 71,283 RCT permanent teeth. The Kaplan-Meier (product limit) estimator was performed to estimate survival rate after the first RCT performed on a specific tooth. The Cox proportional hazards model was done to account for patient- and tooth-specific covariates. The overall median survival time was 11.1 y; 26% of RCT teeth survived beyond 20 y. Tooth type, presence of dental insurance any time during dental care, placement of crown and/or receiving a filling soon after RCT, and Network region were significant predictors of survival time (P < 0.0001). Gender and age were not statistically significant predictors in univariable analysis, but in multivariable analyses, gender was significant after accounting for other variables. This study of Network practices geographically distributed across the United States observed shorter longevity of endodontically treated permanent teeth than in previous community-based studies. Also, having a crown placed following an RCT was associated with 5.3 y longer median survival time. Teeth that received a filling soon after the RCT before the crown was placed had a median survival time of 20.1 y compared to RCT teeth with only a crown (11.4 y), only a filling (11.2 y), or no filling and no crown (6.5 y).

A retrospective assessment of different endodontic treatment protocols

Background

The aim of this study was to assess the clinical impact of non-surgical root canal treatments (NSRCT) performed with different treatment protocols on the probability of tooth survival without untoward events and to identify predictors influencing the outcome.

Methods

During the period from July 1999 to October 2016, 5,858 patients were identified in which 9,967 NSRCTs were performed. The treatments were followed up and divided into three groups. In Group 1 root canal treatment was performed with hand instruments, in Group 2 with multiple file rotary instruments and passive ultrasonic irrigation (PUI), and Group 3 was treated with Reciproc instruments and PUI. Untoward events were defined as orthograde retreatment, apicoectomy or extraction of the tooth after initial treatment. Weibull regression was used to analyse the data.

Results

A total of 9,938 cases could be included into the analyses. The results showed 5-years predicted survival rates without untoward events of 73.9% (95% CI [71.7%–76.1%]), 75.1% (95% CI [71.7%–78.0%]) and 78.4% (95% CI [75.1%–81.4%]) for study group 1 (N = 5,580), 2 (N = 1,700) and 3 (N = 2,658), respectively. The differences between Group 1 and 3 were statistically significant (p < 0.006). Higher age of the patient (per year increase) and number of earlier NSRCTs (per unit increase) reduce the survival without untoward events statistically significant (both p < 0.02), while treatment of premolars had a statistically significant lower hazard ratio [0.89 (95% CI [0.79–0.99]; p = 0.030)] compared to treatment of molars and anterior teeth. A higher number of supportive periodontal treatments (per unit increase) improved tooth survival without untoward events highly significant (p < 0.0001).

Discussion

More recent endodontic treatment protocols involving reciprocating instruments and PUI appear to be associated with higher tooth survival rates without untoward events compared to hand instruments.

Outcomes of endodontic therapy in general practice: a study by the Practitioners Engaged in Applied Research and Learning Network

BACKGROUND

The authors undertook a study involving members of a dental practice-based research network to determine the outcome and factors associated with success and failure of endodontic therapy.

METHODS

Members in participating practices (practitioner-investigators [P-Is]) invited the enrollment of all patients seeking treatment in the practice who had undergone primary endodontic therapy and restoration in a permanent tooth three to five years previously. If a patient had more than one tooth so treated, the P-I selected as the index tooth the tooth treated earliest during the three- to five-year period. The authors excluded from the study any teeth that served as abutments for removable partial dentures or overdentures, third molars and teeth undergoing active orthodontic endodontic therapy. The primary outcome was retention of the index tooth. Secondary outcomes, in addition to extraction, that defined failure included clinical or radiographic evidence (or both) of periapical pathosis, endodontic retreatment or pain on percussion.

RESULTS

P-Is in 64 network practices enrolled 1,312 patients with a mean (standard deviation) time to follow-up of 3.9 (0.6) years. During that period, 3.3 percent of the index teeth were extracted, 2.2 percent underwent retreatment, 3.6 percent had pain on percussion and 10.6 percent had periapical radiolucencies for a combined failure rate of 19.1 percent. The presence of preoperative periapical radiolucency with a diagnosis of either irreversible pulpitis or necrotic pulp was associated with failure after multivariate analysis, as were multiple canals, male sex and Hispanic/Latino ethnicity.

CONCLUSIONS

These results suggest that failure rates for endodontic therapy are higher than previously reported in general practices, according to results of studies based on dental insurance claims data.

CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS

The results of this study can help guide the practitioner in deciding the most appropriate course of therapy for teeth with irreversible pulpitis, necrotic pulp or periapical periodontitis.

Calcium oxide as a root filling material: a three-year prospective clinical outcome study

Calcium oxide, available for decades as a root canal filling material, has been little used in recent years due to its lack of radio-opacity, and an expectation that it would lead to an excess of root fractures. In this study, four general dentists submitted 79 cases of endodontically treated teeth whose roots were filled with either Biocalex 6/9, or Endocal-10, and rendered adequately radio-opaque with yttrium oxide. Fifty-seven teeth were available for follow up at three years. Criteria for success were comfort, function, radiographic signs of healing. The overall success rate was 89%. The percentage of teeth retained in function was 98%; aside from one equivocal case, no teeth were lost due to root fractures. These numbers are indistinguishable from success rates reported for conventional root filling materials. Conclusion: Calcium oxide may be considered as a safe and viable alternative to other current methods of root obturation.

Tooth survival following non-surgical root canal treatment: a systematic review of the literature

AIMS

To investigate (i) the effect of study characteristics on reported tooth survival after root canal treatment (RCTx) and (ii) the effect of clinical factors on the proportion of root filled teeth surviving after RCTx.

METHODOLOGY

Longitudinal human clinical studies investigating tooth survival after RCTx which were published up to the end of 2007 were identified electronically (MEDLINE and Cochrane database 1966-2007 December, week 4). In addition, four journals (Dental Traumatology, International Endodontic Journal, Journal of Endodontics, Oral Surgery Oral Medicine Oral Pathology Oral Radiology & Endodontics), bibliographies of all relevant articles and review articles were hand searched. Two reviewers (Y-LN, KG) assessed and selected the studies based on specified inclusion criteria and extracted the data onto a pre-designed proforma, independently. The criteria were as follows: (i) clinical study on RCTx; (ii) stratified analysis of primary and secondary RCTx available; (iii) sample size given and larger than 10; (iv) at least 6-month postoperative review; (v) success based on survival of tooth; and (vi) proportion of teeth surviving after treatment given or could be calculated from the raw data. Three strands of evidence or analyses were used to triangulate a consensus view. The reported findings from individual studies, including those excluded for quantitative analysis, were utilized for the intuitive synthesis, which constituted the first strand of evidence. Secondly, the pooled weighted proportion of teeth surviving and thirdly the combined effects of potential prognostic factors were estimated using the fixed and random effects meta-analyses on studies fulfilling all the inclusion criteria.

RESULTS

Of the 31 articles identified, 14 studies published between 1993 and 2007 were included. The majority of studies were retrospective (n = 10) and only four prospective. The pooled percentages of reported tooth survival over 2-3, 4-5 and 8-10 years following RCTx were 86% (95% CI: 75%, 98%), 93% (95% CI: 92%, 94%) and 87% (95% CI: 82%, 92%), respectively. Substantial differences in study characteristics were found to hinder effective direct comparison of findings. Evidence for the effect of prognostic factors on tooth survival was weak. Based on the data available for meta-analyses, four conditions were found to significantly improve tooth survival. In descending order of influence, the conditions increasing observed proportion of survival were as follows: (i) a crown restoration after RCTx; (ii) tooth having both mesial and distal proximal contacts; (iii) tooth not functioning as an abutment for removable or fixed prosthesis; and (iv) tooth type or specifically non-molar teeth. Statistical heterogeneity was substantial in some cases but its source could not be investigated because of insufficient available information.

CONCLUSIONS

The pooled proportion of teeth surviving over 2-10 years following RCTx ranged between 86% and 93%. Four factors (listed above) were identified as significant prognostic factors with concurrence between all three strands of evidence.

Dislocation resistance of ProRoot Endo Sealer, a calcium silicate-based root canal sealer, from radicular dentine

AIM

To examine the dislocation resistance of three root canal sealers from radicular dentine with and without immersion in a simulated body fluid (SBF), using a modified push-out test design that produced simulated canal spaces of uniform dimensions under identical cleaning and shaping conditions.

METHODOLOGY

Sixty single-rooted caries-free human canine teeth were used. Standardized simulated canal spaces were created using 0.04 taper ProFile instruments along the coronal, middle and apical thirds of longitudinal tooth slabs. Following NaOCl/ethylenediamine tetra-acetic acid cleaning, the cavities were filled with ProRoot Endo Sealer, AH Plus Jet or Pulp Canal Sealer. After setting, half of the cavities were tested with a fibre-optic light-illuminated push-out testing device. The rest were immersed in SBF for 4 weeks before push-out evaluation. Failure modes were examined with stereomicroscopy and field emission (FE)-scanning electron microscopy.

RESULTS

Location of the sealer-filled cavities did not affect push-out strengths. ProRoot Endo Sealer exhibited higher push-out strengths than the other two sealers particularly after SBF storage (P < 0.001). Failure modes were predominantly adhesive and mixed for Pulp Canal Sealer and AH Plus Jet, and predominantly cohesive for ProRoot Endo Sealer. Spherical amorphous calcium phosphate-like phases that spontaneously transformed into apatite-like phases were seen in the fractured specimens of ProRoot Endo Sealer after SBF storage.

CONCLUSIONS

When tested in bulk without a main core, both 'sealer type' and 'SBF storage' were significant in affecting push-out results. The ProRoot Endo Sealer demonstrated the presence of spherical amorphous calcium phosphate-like phases and apatite-like phases (i.e. ex vivo bioactivity) after SBF storage.

Predictors of Root Canal Treatment in Teeth With Full Coverage Restorations

This case-control study sought to identify variables predictive of subsequent root canal therapy (RCT) in teeth receiving full coverage restorations. The University of North Carolina School of Dentistry's computerized treatment database was used to identify all patients receiving a single-unit crown on a nonendodontically treated permanent tooth from January 1, 1998 through December 31, 2002. These patients then were classified either as cases (those whose crowned teeth received RCT before July 1, 2004) or controls (those whose crowned teeth did not). Computerized data, chart entries, and dental radiographs were examined to determine pre-, intra-, and postoperative factors of interest. In the final multivariable logistic regression model that included 66 cases and 71 controls, younger age (p = 0.005) and greater extent of coronal and root destruction (p = 0.020) remained statistically significant predictors of case status, though many potentially important predictors were unavailable through chart review. Patients could benefit if prospective studies were conducted to identify factors predictive of subsequent endodontic involvement in newly crowned teeth.

Evidence-based decision-making: implants versus natural teeth

The clinician is increasingly confronted with the dilemma of whether to use implants or so-called "traditional" dental interventions. Given the high predictability of implants, their use should be considered routine. The survival and success rates reported by many investigators often exceed the success rates of some forms of heroic treatment. Findings from well-designed trials must be used to guide clinical decision-making. In this article, the authors review studies of outcomes related to one particular implant system and compare these results to those reported for various forms of endodontic therapy and tissue-supported mandibular complete dentures. The results suggest that implant restorations of the system in question have a level of predictability equal to or greater than that for traditional dental treatment.

Endodontics and Implants, a Catalog of Therapeutic Contrasts

Dentists may be faced with the choice to retain a tooth by performing endodontic therapy and restoration or to extract the tooth and replace it with an implant and restoration. The purpose of this study was to catalog areas where implant and endodontic therapies differ so as to assist dentists in making treatment decisions and in identifying areas deserving of future research. Differences in diagnostic procedures and prognostic indicators were listed. With respect to treatment outcomes, study designs, success criteria, treatment results, systematic reviews, complications, clinician expertise, and the use of patient-based measures were discussed. The need for clinically applicable consensus statements and treatment protocols was noted. It was concluded that at this time, choices between implant and endodontic therapies cannot be solely based on outcomes measurement evidence; that different modes of outcome measure frustrate direct comparison; that endodontic and implant therapies profoundly differ in many ways; that although rigorous and clearly defined outcome measures have been proposed for use in endodontic and implant outcomes studies, they are very rarely used; that long-term, large, clearly defined studies, with simple and clear outcome measures, for example survival in combination with defined treatment protocols, are needed to measure the clinical performance of endodontic and implant therapies; and it was recognized that broad outcomes data may not be sufficiently specific to directly impact clinical decision making.

Levels of Evidence for the Outcome of Nonsurgical Endodontic Treatment

The purpose of this systematic review was (a) to search for clinical articles pertaining to success and failure of nonsurgical root canal therapy, and (b) to assign levels of evidence to these studies. Electronic and manual searches were conducted to identify studies published between January 1966 and September 2004 with information on the success and failure of nonsurgical root canal therapy. Articles were reviewed and graded for strength of level of evidence (LOE) from one (highest level) to five (lowest level). This review resulted in the identification of 306 clinical studies related to this topic area. Six articles were randomized controlled trials (RCTs, LOE 1). This search also identified 12 low-quality RCTs (LOE 2), 14 cohort studies (LOE 2), five case-control and eight cross sectional studies (LOE 3), four low-quality cohort studies (LOE 4), and five low-quality case-control studies (LOE 4). The majority (73) of the often-quoted "success and failure" studies were case series (LOE 4). The rest of the articles were descriptive epidemiological studies (42), case reports (114), expert opinions (18), literature reviews (4), and one meta-analysis. Based on these findings, it appears that a few high-level studies have been published in the past four decades related to the success and failure of nonsurgical root canal therapy. The data generated by this search can be used in future studies to specifically answer questions and test hypotheses relevant to the outcome of nonsurgical root canal treatment.