Outcomes and treatment options in rectovaginal endometriosis

Analysis of factors that could affect symptomatic outcome in patients having laparoscopic excision of deep rectovaginal endometriosis in BSGE endometriosis centres

OBJECTIVE

Investigate factors that influence quality of life after laparoscopic excision of deep rectovaginal endometriosis.

STUDY DESIGN

A multicentre prospective cohort study involving 63 hospitals accredited as British Society for Gynaecological Endoscopy specialist endometriosis centres was conducted. The study population comprised of 8368 women who had undergone laparoscopic surgical excision of deep rectovaginal endometriosis requiring dissection of the pararectal space. The main outcome assessed was mean quality of life measured using the EuroQol 100 mm visual analogue score at 6 and 24 months after surgery according to potential prognostic factors. These factors included patient characteristics (age, smoking status, BMI), previous treatments for endometriosis, concomitant bowel surgery and surgical complications.

RESULTS

Quality of life improved from a mean pre-operative score of 55/100 to 72/100 (p < 0.01), at 6 months following surgery and this elevated score was sustained at 24 months (mean VAS = 71/100; p < 0.01). Smoking and previous surgery for endometriosis were associated with significantly reduced quality of life at both 6 months (mean difference -7.7 (standard error (SE) 1.0); P < 0.01 and -2.8 (SE 0.7); P < 0.01 respectively) and 24 months after surgery (mean difference -6.8 (SE 1.8); P < 0.01 and -4.5 (SE 1.2); P < 0.01 respectively). Age over 45 years was predictive of greater clinical improvement at 6 and 24 months (mean difference 5.5 (SE 1.2); P < 0.01 and 9.7 (SE 2.2); P < 0.01) as was the use of gonadotrophin analogues (GnRHa) (mean difference 7.6 (SE 1.2); P < 0.01 and 8.9 (SE 2.0); P < 0.01).

CONCLUSION(S)

Laparoscopic excision of deep endometriosis in specialist centres improves quality of life. Women should be advised to stop smoking and consider pre-operative ovarian suppression. Surgery should be avoided prior to referral to a specialist centre in women diagnosed with deep rectovaginal endometriosis to achieve a better quality of life outcome.

Laparoscopic excision of deeply infiltrating endometriosis: a prospective observational study assessing perioperative complications in 244 patients

PURPOSE

To examine peri-operative complications in patients undergoing laparoscopic excision of deeply infiltrating endometriosis (DIE).

METHODS

This was a prospective study of a case series of women having laparoscopic excision of deeply infiltrating endometriosis from September 2013 through August 2016 in a tertiary referral center for endometriosis and minimally invasive gynaecological surgery in Iran. Data collected included demographics, baseline characteristics, intraoperative and postoperative data up to 1 month following surgery.

RESULTS

We analysed data from 244 consecutive patients, who underwent radical laparoscopic excision of all visible DIE. Major postoperative complications occurred in 3 (1.2%) and minor complications in 27 (11.1%) of patients. 80.3% of our patient group had Stage IV endometriosis. Segmental bowel resection was performed in 34 (13.9%), disc resection in 7 (2.9%), rectal shave in 53 (21.7%). Joint operating between a gynaecologist and colorectal and/or urological colleague was required in 29.6% of cases. The mean operating time was 223.8 min (± 80.7 standard deviation, range 60-440 min) and mean hospital stay was 2.9 days (± 1.5 standard deviation, range 1-11). The conversion to laparotomy rate was 1.6%.

CONCLUSIONS

A combination of different laparoscopic surgical techniques to completely excise all visible DIE, within the context of a tertiary referral center offering multi-disciplinary approach, produces safe outcomes with low complication rates.

Mesenteric vascular and nerve sparing surgery in laparoscopic segmental intestinal resection for deep infiltrating endometriosis

OBJECTIVE(S)

To investigate Mesenteric vascular and nerve Sparing Surgery (MSS) as surgical laparoscopic technique to perform segmental intestinal resection for deep infiltrating endometriosis (DIE).

STUDY DESIGN

Prospective cohort study between January 2013 and December 2016. Consecutive patients with suspected intestinal DIE underwent clinical and imaging evaluation to confirm intestinal involvement. Indications for radical surgery and surgical technique (intestinal resection versus shaving) were consistent with Abrão algorithm. Surgeons aimed to perform MSS in all the consecutive patients that required intestinal resection. MSS consists in mesenteric artery, branching arteries, and surrounding nerve fibers preservation by dissecting mesentery adherent to the intestinal wall. Data about history, preoperative and post-operative evaluation, surgery and complications were recorded. Symptoms were evaluated before and 30-60 days after surgery with numeric rating scale for pain. Constipation was evaluated with the Constipation Assessment Scale (CAS). Patients with diagnosis of irritable bowel syndrome, inflammatory bowel diseases, diverticulitis, and previous segmental intestinal resection were excluded.

RESULTS

Sixty-two out of 75 (82.7%) consecutive women with intestinal endometriosis underwent laparoscopic segmental intestinal resection performed with MSS. Major complications that required repeated operation occurred in 4 cases (6.5%). Anastomotic leakage occurred in only 1 case (1.6%). Dysmenorrhea (p < .001; r = -0.86), dyspareunia (p < .001; r = -0.80), dyschezia (p < .001; r = -0.86) and dysuria (p < .001; r = -0.56) were significantly improved after surgery. After an average of 33.1 months from surgery, severe constipation was reported only by two patients (3.6%) (CAS: 13-16). The median time from surgery to intestinal function recovery (flatus or stool passage) was one day. Logistic regression analysis showed constipation related to the distance from anal verge and time since surgery.

CONCLUSION(S)

MSS in laparoscopic intestinal resection for DIE may be reproducible, safe and effective. MSS could be combined with pelvic nerve-sparing surgery as an effective approach to improve intestinal symptoms after radical surgery for DIE that requires segmental intestinal resection.

Laparoscopic excision of deep rectovaginal endometriosis in BSGE endometriosis centres: a multicentre prospective cohort study

OBJECTIVE

To estimate the effectiveness and safety of laparoscopic surgical excision of rectovaginal endometriosis.

DESIGN

A multicentre, prospective cohort study.

SETTING

51 hospitals accredited as specialist endometriosis centres.

PARTICIPANTS

5162 women of reproductive age with rectovaginal endometriosis of which 4721 women had planned laparoscopic excision.

INTERVENTIONS

Laparoscopic surgical excision of rectovaginal endometriosis requiring dissection of the pararectal space.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Standardised symptom questionnaires enquiring about chronic pelvic pain, bladder and bowel symptoms, analgesia use and quality of life (EuroQol) completed prior to surgery and at 6, 12 and 24 months postoperatively. Serious perioperative and postoperative complications including major haemorrhage, infection and visceral injury were recorded.

RESULTS

At 6 months postsurgery, there were significant reductions in premenstrual, menstrual and non-cyclical pelvic pain, deep dyspareunia, dyschezia, low back pain and bladder pain. In addition, there were significant reductions in voiding difficulty, bowel frequency, urgency, incomplete emptying, constipation and passing blood. These reductions were maintained at 2 years, with the exception of voiding difficulty. Global quality of life significantly improved from a median pretreatment score of 55/100 to 80/100 at 6 months. There was a significant improvement in quality of life in all measured domains and in quality-adjusted life years. These improvements were sustained at 2 years. All analgesia use was reduced and, in particular, opiate use fell from 28.1% prior to surgery to 16.1% at 6 months. The overall incidence of complications was 6.8% (321/4721). Gastrointestinal complications (enterotomy, anastomotic leak or fistula) occurred in 52 (1.1%) operations and of the urinary tract (ureteric/bladder injury or leak) in 49 (1.0%) procedures.

CONCLUSION

Laparoscopic surgical excision of rectovaginal endometriosis appears to be effective in treating pelvic pain and bowel symptoms and improving health-related quality of life and has a low rate of major complications when performed in specialist centres.

Deep Pelvic Endometriosis: From Diagnosis to Wellness

Purpose

to determine the efficacy of laparoscopic excision of deep pelvic endometriosis (DPE).

Methods

One hundred and two highly symptomatic women with DPE underwent clinical examination, transvaginal ultrasound, nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) and sonovaginography. Among the 102 women, 50 patients, with severe symptoms, underwent laparoscopic excision of DPE. Endoscopic surgery was performed with complete separation of the rectovaginal space and resection of the node. In the case of vaginal involvement vaginal exeresis was performed, in the case of rectal wall involvement of more than 50%, segmental bowel resection was performed. Operative data as well as dysmenorrhea, dyspareunia, chronic pelvic pain and dyschezia before and 6 and 12 months after surgical treatment were recorded.

Results

Mean operative time was 126.4 ± 34.7 min, mean blood loss was 76.2 ± 22 ml. In 17 (34%) cases we performed excision of the posterior vaginal fornix due to vaginal wall involvement. In six (12%) cases we performed excision of the rectal wall. At 12-month follow-up 39 (78%) women revealed absent or mild dysmenorrhea, 45 (90%) women revealed absent or mild dyspareunia, 46 (92%) women revealed absent or mild chronic pelvic pain, 48 (96%) women revealed absent or mild dyschezia.

Conclusions

Surgical management of DPE could be a radical approach for this disease but conservative for the patients, ensuring good improvement in symptoms and good patient satisfaction, and only performing vaginal or rectal exeresis when strictly necessary.

[A Case of Cecal Endometriosis Presenting as Subepithelial Tumor]

Endometriosis is a benign gynecologic disease, characterized by the presence and growth of functional endometrial-like tissue outside uterus. This ectopic endometrial tissue is most commonly found in the peritoneum, ovaries and uterosacral ligaments, but extremely rarely there is involvement of the appendix or cecum. Here we report a case of cecal endometriosis presenting as a subepithelial tumor diagnosed by surgical excision.

Full-Thickness Excision versus Shaving by Laparoscopy for Intestinal Deep Infiltrating Endometriosis: Rationale and Potential Treatment Options

Endometriosis is defined as the presence of endometrial mucosa (glands and stroma) abnormally implanted in locations other than the uterine cavity. Deep infiltrating endometriosis (DIE) is considered the most aggressive presentation of the disease, penetrating more than 5 mm in affected tissues, and it is reported in approximately 20% of all women with endometriosis. DIE can cause a complete distortion of the pelvic anatomy and it mainly involves uterosacral ligaments, bladder, rectovaginal septum, rectum, and rectosigmoid colon. This review describes the state of the art in laparoscopic approach for DIE with a special interest in intestinal involvement, according to recent literature findings. Our attention has been focused particularly on full-thickness excision versus shaving technique in deep endometriosis intestinal involvement. Particularly, the aim of this paper is clarifying from the clinical and methodological points of view the best surgical treatment of deep intestinal endometriosis, since there is no standard of care in the literature and in different surgical settings. Indeed, this review tries to suggest when it is advisable to manage the full-thickness excision or the shaving technique, also analyzing perioperative management, main complications, and surgical outcomes.

Laparoscopic Surgery for Rectovaginal Endometriosis: A Retrospective Descriptive Study from a Single Centre

Introduction

Rectovaginal endometriosis is a form of deep infiltrating endometriosis and accounts for 5%-10% of cases. It is a very difficult to treat and can be associated with severe complications.

Objectives

The aim was to document the outcomes of patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery for rectovaginal endometriosis.

Methods

A retrospective audit of 112 consecutive women undergoing laparoscopic surgery for rectovaginal endometriosis at Vincent Pallotti's Aevitas Fertility Clinic was undertaken. Women were identified from a surgical database using medical aid coding and a review of case notes. Patients were telephonically contacted to gather missing information and to assess further outcomes.

Results

The majority of surgeries were performed using the shaving technique, in keeping with international trends, whilst fourteen cases required a segmental resection owing to extensive disease. Complications included rectovaginal fistulas (3 cases), bowel injuries (2 cases), ureteric injury (1 case), a pelvic abscess (1 case), a blood transfusion (1 case) and the need for three urgent re-operations. Of the 71 patients desiring fertility, 39 (54.9%) fell pregnant. Twenty-seven (69.2%) were spontaneous conceptions.

Conclusions

Our outcomes are in keeping with complication rates quoted in the international literature. In trained hands, laparoscopic surgery at our unit is a valid option in the management of rectovaginal endometriosis with similar complication rates and outcomes to international standards.

Clear cell thymic carcinoma: a case report

Clear cell thymic carcinoma is a rare and invasive tumor of the mediastinum for which there are no uniform treatment guidelines. The combination of carboplatin plus paclitaxel seems to be the most effective regimen for this disease. We report a case of locally advanced clear cell thymic carcinoma treated with this schedule, in which we observed a relevant and rapid tumor shrinkage.

Clinical outcome after radical excision of moderate-severe endometriosis with or without bowel resection and reanastomosis: a prospective cohort study

OBJECTIVE

To assess the clinical outcome of women requiring laparoscopic excision of moderate-severe endometriosis in women with and without bowel resection and reanastomosis.

METHODS

Two hundred three patients with laparoscopically excised moderate (n = 67) or severe (n = 136) endometriosis (rAFS: revised endometriosis classification of the American Fertility Society) were prospectively followed during a median of 20 months (1-45 months) using a CONSORT-inspired checklist. Patients completed the EHP30 Quality-of-Life Questionnaire and visual analogue scales (VAS) for dysmenorrhea, chronic pelvic pain, and deep dyspareunia and answered questions about postoperative complications, reinterventions/recurrences, and fertility outcome 1 month before and 6, 12, 18, and 24 months after surgery. Clinical outcome was compared between women with deeply infiltrative endometriosis undergoing CO2 laser ablative surgery with bowel resection (study group, 76/203; 37%) and without bowel resection (control group, 127/203; 63%).

RESULTS

Both groups were similar with respect to population characteristics and clinical outcome, except for mean rAFS score [higher in study group (73 ± 31) than in control group (48 ± 26)] and minor complication rate [higher in study group (11%) than in control group (1%)]. In both groups, mean VAS and EHP30 scores improved significantly and remained stable for 24 months after surgery, with a pregnancy rate of 51%. Within 1, 2, and 3 years follow-up, the cumulative reintervention rate was 1%, 7%, and 10%, respectively, and the cumulative endometriosis recurrence rate was 1%, 6%, and 8%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Clinical outcome after CO2 laser laparoscopic excision of moderate-severe endometriosis was comparable in women with or without bowel resection and reanastomosis, except for a higher minor complication rate occurring in women with bowel resection and reanastomosis (NCT00463398).

Effect of laparoscopic surgery for moderate and severe endometriosis on depression, relationship satisfaction and sexual functioning: comparison of patients with and without bowel resection

STUDY QUESTION

Is there a difference between women with endometriosis who underwent laparoscopic surgery with bowel resection or without bowel resection regarding depressive symptoms, relational adjustment and sexual functioning?

SUMMARY ANSWER

Radical surgery for endometriosis in both groups improved the levels of depression and sexual functioning, but only the bowel resection patients showed improvements in relationship satisfaction. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY?: The frequent pain symptoms in endometriosis patients can have an impact on psychological issues, relationships and sexual functioning. There are no data available on depression and relationship adjustment after endometriosis surgery. Sexual dysfunction problems have been described after bowel resection for rectal cancer, but no data are available for endometriosis surgery.

STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION

This prospective cohort study included 203 consecutive women operated at the Leuven University Fertility Center (LUFC) between 1 September 2006 and 30 September 2008 for moderate (n = 67) or severe (n = 136) endometriosis. The preoperative response rate was respectively 84% in the bowel resection group and 79% in the no bowel resection group.

PARTICIPANTS, SETTING, METHODS

The beck depression inventory (BDI) measured depression, the dyadic adjustment scale (DAS) measured relationship satisfaction and the short sexual functioning scale (SSFS) measured sexual functioning before and 6, 12 and 18 months after women had laparoscopic surgery at the LUFC, a tertiary referral centre for fertility exploration, treatment and surgery.

MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE

Both groups had better post-operative outcomes when compared with the preoperative assessments. Mean BDI and DAS levels were comparable with the normal population. Overall assessment points, the bowel resection patients had better outcomes for DAS (P < 0.05) and SSFS 'arousal' (P < 0.05) than the no bowel resection patients. At 6 months after the operation, when compared with the no bowel resection group, the bowel resection group reported lower mean levels of BDI (P < 0.05), a lower incidence of SSFS 'pain during intercourse' and 'orgasm problems' (P < 0.05), and a lower proportion of patients with severe orgasm problems (P < 0.05). The data show that radical but fertility sparing surgery, with or without bowel resection, for the treatment of endometriosis results in comparable and good psychological outcomes concerning depression levels, relationship satisfaction and sexual functioning.

LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION

Although the initial response rate was good, response dropped over time and was significantly higher for bowel resection patients compared with the no bowel resection patients (P = 0.05). A responder/non-responder analysis for the whole study population showed no significant differences concerning pain problems. This reduces the possible risk of (positive) bias in the results.

WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS

Endometriosis is a complex condition and the focus should not be on a one-dimensional end-organ gynaecological outcome, but should take into account the role of psychological factors in pain-related outcome. To this end, more prospective data are needed on sexual functioning and psychological outcomes.

Clinical outcome after laparoscopic radical excision of endometriosis and laparoscopic segmental bowel resection

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To present the clinical outcome after laparoscopic radical excision of deeply infiltrative endometriosis (DIE) with colorectal extension and laparoscopic segmental bowel resection.

RECENT FINDINGS

In three different studies including mostly patients with recurrent DIE with colorectal extension, we showed that radical reconstructive CO2 laser laparoscopic resection of DIE with colorectal extension in a multidisciplinary setting resulted in a low complication rate, a low cumulative reintervention and recurrence rate and a high cumulative pregnancy rate, also when bowel resection reanastomosis was performed. In a systematic review to assess the clinical outcome of surgical treatment of DIE with colorectal involvement, data were reported in such a way that comparison of different surgical techniques was not possible. A checklist is proposed to achieve standardized reporting of presenting symptoms, preoperative tests, inclusion criteria, preoperative and postoperative care, complications, follow-up, patient-centered assessment of pain and quality of life, fertility and recurrence corrected for postoperative use of hormonal suppression or infertility treatment.

SUMMARY

CO2 laser laparoscopic radical excision of DIE with colorectal extension and laparoscopic segmental bowel resection in centers of expertise is associated with good clinical outcome. To make real progress, international agreement is needed on terms and definitions used in surgical endometriosis research.

Treatment of endometriosis with laparoscopic surgery today

Az endometriosis korszerű sebészi kezelésének célja a károsodott kismedencei anatómia helyreállításával az endometriosishoz társuló fájdalomtünetek csökkentése, illetve a teherbe esési esélyek javítása. Cikkünkben a különböző elhelyezkedésű kismedencei endometriosislaesiók eltávolításának műtéti lehetőségeit elemezzük. Az endometriosis sebészi kezelése döntően laparoszkópia útján valósul meg, míg a laparotomia alkalmazási köre egyre inkább beszűkült és csak speciális esetekre korlátozódik. A peritonealis endometriosis laesiói reszekció, elektrokoaguláció vagy lézervaporizáció segítségével kezelhetők, amelyek azonos mértékben csökkentik az endometriosishoz társuló fájdalomtüneteket, illetve javítják a teherbe esési esélyeket. Az endometrioma kezelésében hosszú éveken át kétféle műtéti megoldás terjedt el; a cisztatok eltávolítása az úgynevezett strippingtechnika segítségével, valamint a cisztatok megszüntetése az ablatiós műtéti technikával. Napjainkra egyértelműen bebizonyosodott, hogy a stripping előnyösebb az endometrioma ablatiójával szemben mind a fájdalomtünetek csökkenése, mind a reproduktív funkciók szempontjából. A mélyen infiltráló endometriosis kezelése jelenti a legnagyobb kihívást az endometriosis sebészetében. A mélyen infiltráló laesiók eltávolításában a lézertechnika alkalmazásának jut főszerep. A rectovaginalis septum endometriosisa esetén lézer segítségével a mélyen infiltráló laesio biztonsággal és maradéktalanul eltávolítható. Bélendometriosis esetén az érintett bélszakaszt szegmentális reszekcióval, discreszekcióval vagy az úgynevezett shavingtechnikával távolíthatjuk el. Leggyakrabban a szegmentális reszekciót alkalmazzuk, mivel egyedül ez esetben biztosítható a reszekciós szél biztos épsége. Az ureter endometriosisa esetén kisfokú érintettség mellett ureterolysis, míg obstruktív uropathia fennállásakor az ureter reszekciója javasolható. Az endometriosishoz társuló fájdalom hatékonyabb csökkentését célozza a praesacralis neurectomia és az uterusidegrost-ablatio. Ezen beavatkozások klinikai eredményessége azonban nem egyértelmű, az endometriosis kezelésében betöltött pontos szerepük tisztázása további vizsgálatokat igényel. Az endometriosis sebészetében a folyamatosan fejlődő műtéti technikák az endometriosislaesiók egyre teljesebb és hatékonyabb eltávolítását teszik lehetővé, amelynek köszönhetően egyre eredményesebben kezelhetők az endometriosishoz társuló klinikai tünetek és csökkenthető a betegség kiújulásának veszélye.

Complications, pregnancy and recurrence in a prospective series of 500 patients operated on by the shaving technique for deep rectovaginal endometriotic nodules

BACKGROUND

The debate continues between advocates of the shaving technique and supporters of bowel resection in case of deep endometriosis with rectal muscularis involvement, despite little evidence for better improvement with bowel resection.

METHODS

We analyzed complication, pregnancy and recurrence rates after deep endometriotic nodule excision by shaving surgery. This is a prospective analysis of 500 cases (<40 years old) of deep endometriotic nodules.

RESULTS

Laparoscopic nodule resection was performed successfully in all cases. Major complications included: (i) rectal perforation in seven cases (1.4%); (ii) ureteral injury in four cases (0.8%); (iii) blood loss >300 ml in one case (0.2%); and (iv) urinary retention in four cases (0.8%). The median follow-up duration was 3.1 years (range 2-6 years). In our prospective series of 500 women, 388 wished to conceive. Of this number, 221 (57%) became pregnant naturally and 107 by means of IVF. In total, 328 women (84%) conceived. The recurrence rate was 8% among these 500 women, and it was significantly lower (P < 0.05) in women who became pregnant (3.6%) than in those who did not (15%). In women who failed to conceive, or were not interested in conceiving, severe pelvic pain recurred in 16-20% of patients.

CONCLUSION

In young women, conservative surgery using the shaving technique preserves organs, nerves and the vascular blood supply, yielding a high pregnancy rate and low complication and recurrence rates. There is a need, however, for further strong and energetic debate to weigh up the benefits of shaving (debulking surgery) versus rectal resection (radical surgery).

The early outcome of laparoscopic sigmoid and rectal resection for endometriosis

AIM

Deeply infiltrating endometriosis (DIE) is the most severe form of endometriosis and may affect the rectum and sigmoid colon. The most effective treatment is segmental resection. We report our results of rectal and sigmoid resection for this.

METHOD

The study comprises all patients who have had laparoscopic bowel resection for rectal or sigmoid endometriosis in the Päijät-Häme Central Hospital between 1 January 2004 and 31 May 2007. Patient demographics, operative details, complications and early postoperative recovery were prospectively collected and analysed.

RESULTS

A total of 31 patients were treated using a multidisciplinary approach. The mean age was 33.6 years (range 21.7-48.6) and body mass index 24.2 (17-40). The mean operation time was 253.5 min (range 56-484). There were three sigmoid and 28 rectal resections and 80 concomitant gynaecological procedures. Conversion to open surgery was not required. A total of 23 (74.2%) patients recovered without complications. There were two major complications, anastomotic leakage and rectovaginal fistula. Minor complications included transient urinary retention (2), wound infection (1), pneumonia (1) and undefined fever (2). The mean time to full peroral diet was 3.8 days (range 3-7), to first flatus 2.6 days (1-4), to first bowel movement 3.5 days (2-6) and to discharge 5.7 days (4-13).

CONCLUSION

Laparoscopic rectal and sigmoid resection for deep intestinal endometriosis is safe with few severe complications and rapid recovery. The long-term outcome on symptoms requires further study.

Intestinal endometriosis mimicking carcinoma of rectum and sigmoid colon: a report of five cases

Among women with intestinal endometriosis, the sigmoid colon and rectum are the most commonly involved areas. Sometimes, the differential diagnosis of colorectal endometriosis from carcinoma of the colon and rectum is difficult due to similar colonoscopic and radiologic findings. From October 2002 to September 2007, we performed five operations with curative intent for rectal and sigmoid colon cancer that revealed intestinal endometriosis. Colonoscopic and radiologic findings were suggestive of carcinoma of rectum and sigmoid colon, such as rectal cancer, sigmoid colon cancer and gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST). Anterior resection was performed in two patients, low anterior resection was performed in one patient and laparoscopic low anterior resection was done in two patients. We suggest to consider also intestinal endometriosis in reproductive women presenting with gastrointestinal symptoms and an intestinal mass of unknown origin.

Medical treatment for rectovaginal endometriosis: what is the evidence?

BACKGROUND

Rectovaginal endometriosis usually causes distressing pain. Surgical treatment may be effective but is associated with a high risk of morbidity and major complications. Information on the effect of medical alternatives for pain relief in this condition is scarce.

METHODS

A comprehensive literature search was conducted to identify all the English language published observational and randomized studies evaluating the efficacy of medical treatments on pain associated with rectovaginal endometriosis. A combination of keywords was used to identify relevant citations in PubMed, MEDLINE and EMBASE.

RESULTS

A total of 217 cases of medically treated rectovaginal endometriosis were found; 68 in five observational, non-comparative studies, 59 in one patient preference cohort study, and 90 in a randomized controlled trial. An aromatase inhibitor was used in two of the non-comparative studies, vaginal danazol in one, a GnRH agonist in one, and an intrauterine progestin in one. Two estrogen-progestin combinations used transvaginally or transdermally were evaluated in the patient preference study, whereas an oral progestin and an estrogen-progestin combination were compared in the randomized controlled trial. With the exception of an aromatase inhibitor used alone, the antalgic effect of the considered medical therapies was high for the entire treatment period (from 6 to 12 months), with 60-90% of patients reporting considerable reduction or complete relief from pain symptoms.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite problems in interpretation of data, the effect of medical treatment in terms of pain relief in women with rectovaginal endometriosis appear substantial.

Outcome after multidisciplinary CO2 laser laparoscopic excision of deep infiltrating colorectal endometriosis

The aim of this retrospective cohort study was to evaluate clinical outcome after multidisciplinary laparoscopic excision of deep endometriosis. Patients (n = 56) were asked to complete questionnaires regarding quality of life (QOL), pain, fertility and sexuality to compare their status before and after surgery, and their medical files were analysed. Statistical analysis was performed with life table analysis, paired Wilcoxon and McNemar tests. Gynaecological pain, QOL and sexual activity improved significantly (P < 0.001; P < 0.0001 to P = 0.008 and P < 0.0001 to P = 0.0003 respectively) during a median follow-up 29 months after surgery. Post operative complications occurred in 11% but were directly related to surgery in only 5%. The cumulative recurrence rate of endometriosis was 2 and 7% at 1 and 4 years after surgery respectively. Cumulative pregnancy rate was 31 and 70% at 1 and 4 years after surgery respectively. In conclusion, multidisciplinary CO(2) laser laparoscopic excision of deep endometriosis with colorectal extension improves pain, QOL and sexuality with high fertility and low complication and recurrence rates.

Does the learning curve of conservative laparoscopic surgery in women with rectovaginal endometriosis impair the recurrence rate?

OBJECTIVE

To assess the effect of surgeon's increasing experience in conservative laparoscopic surgery of women with rectovaginal endometriosis on the surgical outcome of these patients recurrence rate.

DESIGN

Prospective cohort study.

SETTING

University teaching hospital.

PATIENT(S)

The first 60 consecutive patients undergoing laparoscopic conservative surgery for symptomatic rectovaginal endometriosis at our institution during a 4- year period.

INTERVENTION(S)

Cases were classified into two groups according to the date of the patient's operation: the first 30 cases were defined as the early cases and the subsequent 30 cases as the late cases.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S)

Operating time, perioperative complications, and surgical outcome. Univariate and multivariate analyses for risk factors with recurrence of disease.

RESULT(S)

The two groups were similar in patient characteristics. There was a reduction in the rate of laparoconversion, operating time, estimated amount of blood loss, cases with incomplete removal, and recurrence rate with increasing surgeon's experience. Surgical completeness was significantly associated with recurrence of disease.

CONCLUSION(S)

A learning curve is demonstrated in the conservative laparoscopic management of patients with rectovaginal endometriosis. After gaining experience in performing 30 cases, the recurrence rate is significantly reduced.

Fertility and pain outcomes following laparoscopic segmental bowel resection for colorectal endometriosis: a review

Intestinal involvement in endometriosis is thought to occur in up to 12% of all endometriosis cases. While colorectal resection is being increasingly advocated as a feasible management option in patients with severe disease, there still remains significant resistance towards this surgery. This article aims to review the current literature to determine the pain and fertility outcomes following segmental bowel resection for colorectal endometriosis.

Outcome after rectum or sigmoid resection: a review for gynecologists

It remains unclear when to perform a discoid or segmental bowel resection for large endometriotic nodules with intestinal invasion. Moreover, endometriosis series are rather small to fully evaluate functional consequences of bowel resection. We therefore reviewed the incidence of leakage and functional problems after anterior and sigmoid resection as reported in the surgical literature albeit for other indications. Endoscopic resection clearly is feasible but requires an experienced surgeon. The incidence of leakage is not different after hand-sewn or stapled anastomosis, but is higher after a low rectum resection than after a sigmoid resection. Similarly, functional bowel problems are higher after a low rectum resection than after sigmoid resection. Low rectum resection in addition can be associated with functional bladder problems and sexual disturbances as anorgasmia. In conclusion, short- and long-term complications are much higher after a low rectum than after a sigmoid resection. This seems to be important in making the decision to perform a discoid or a segmental bowel resection for severe endometriosis.

Reproductive performance in infertile women with rectovaginal endometriosis: is surgery worthwhile?

OBJECTIVE

This study was undertaken to ascertain whether the incidence of pregnancy is increased and time-to-conception is reduced in infertile women with rectovaginal endometriosis undergoing conservative surgery compared with those on expectant management.

STUDY DESIGN

A total of 105 infertile women under the age of 40 years with rectovaginal endometriosis and no other associated major infertility factor underwent first-line conservative surgery at laparotomy or expectant management according to a shared decision-making approach.

RESULTS

Among the 44 women who had resection of rectovaginal endometriosis, 15 became pregnant, compared with 22 of the 61 women who choose expectant management (24-month cumulative probabilities, 44.9% and 46.8%, respectively; log-rank test, chi2(1) = 0.75; P = .38). One major and 9 minor postoperative complications occurred. Significant differences in pain-free survival time in favor of the surgery group were observed for dysmenorrhea, dyspareunia, and dyschezia.

CONCLUSION

Conservative surgery for rectovaginal endometriosis in infertile women does not modify the reproductive prognosis although it does increase pain-free survival time.

Ten estrogen-related polymorphisms and endometriosis: a study of multiple gene-gene interactions

OBJECTIVE

Genetic as well as hormonal factors are known to influence the development and clinical course of endometriosis. We aimed to investigate the association among 10 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) involved in the estrogen metabolism and endometriosis and to develop a multiple genetic model.

METHODS

In a case-control study, we investigated the genotype frequencies of 10 estrogen metabolizing SNPs in 32 patients with endometriosis and 790 healthy controls using sequencing-on-chip-technology with solid-phase polymerase chain reaction on oligonucleotide microarrays: catechol-O-methyltransferase, Val158Met G->A, 17-beta-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase type 1 (HSD17), vlV A->C, cytochrome P450 (CYP), 17 A2 allele T->C, CYP1A1 MspI RFLP T->C, CYP1A1 Ile462Val A->G, CYP19 Arg264Cys C->T, CYP19 C1558T C->T, CYP 1B1 Leu432Val, CYP1B1 Asn453Ser, and estrogen receptor alpha IVS1 -401>C. Associations and 2-way interaction models between SNPs were calculated by stepwise logistic regression models.

RESULTS

In a univariate model, HSD17 vlV A->C was associated with a significantly increased risk of endometriosis (P = .004; odds ratio 3.9, 95% confidence interval 1.6-9.8). When all 2-way interactions of investigated SNPs were ascertained, no significant interactions among SNPs were observed. In a multivariate model, HSD17 vlV A->C was also significantly associated with endometriosis (P = .002).

CONCLUSION

We present data on multiple SNPs in patients with endometriosis indicating an association between HSD17 gene variation and the disease. Although not able to demonstrate interaction models of SNPs, we provide evidence of HSD17 vlV A->C as a low penetrance genetic marker of endometriosis.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

II-2.

Quality of life after laparoscopic colorectal resection for endometriosis

BACKGROUND

Indications of colorectal resection for endometriosis remain controversial because of the risk of major complications. Therefore, the aims of the current study were to evaluate the efficacy of laparoscopic segmental colorectal resection for endometriosis on quality of life and gynaecologic and digestive symptoms, and its complications.

METHODS

After magnetic resonance imaging and rectal endoscopic sonographic evaluation of symptomatic colorectal endometriosis, 58 consecutive women requiring colorectal resection were included in this study. Symptom questionnaires and the short-form (SF)-36 Health Status and the quality of life score were completed. Linear intensity scores for several gynaecologic and digestive symptoms and perioperative complications were also recorded.

RESULTS

Fifty-one women (88%) underwent laparoscopic segmental colorectal resection and seven required laparoconversion. Major complications occurred in nine cases (15.5%), including six rectovaginal fistulae (10.3%), and the three remaining complications corresponded to a haemoperitoneum, a uroperitoneum and a pelvic abscess. Median follow-up after colorectal resection was 22.5 months (2-55 months). A significant improvement in dysmenorrhoea (P < 0.0001), dysparaeunia (P < 0.0001), bowel movement pain or cramping (P < 0.0001), pain on defecation (P < 0.0001), diarrhoea (P < 0.016), lower back pain (P < 0.0001) and asthaenia (P < 0.0002) was observed. Tenesmus, rectorrhagia and constipation were not improved. All the items of the SF-36 Health Status and the quality of life score were improved after colorectal resection for endometriosis.

CONCLUSION

Laparoscopic segmental colorectal resection for endometriosis significantly improves quality of life and gynaecologic and digestive symptoms. However, women have to be informed on the risk of complications including rectovaginal fistula.