Detecting early functional damage in glaucoma suspect and ocular hypertensive patients with the multifocal VEP technique

Visual Evoked Potentials in Primary Open Angle Glaucoma

Background and Aims

Visual evoked potentials (VEPs) assess the integrity of the visual pathways from the optic nerve to the occipital cortex. Optic disc cupping and visual field loss have been associated with prolongation of latency of VEP in primary open angle glaucoma (POAG).

Methods

Pattern reversal and flash VEP tests were done in consenting 20 primary open angle glaucoma eyes and 40 normal control eyes.

Results

In POAG cases, the refractive error [3.51 ± 1.88 versus 1.88 ± 1.11, D, p = 0.001], cup-disc ratio in percent [66.00 ± 16.98 versus 28.50 ± 5.80, p = 0.001], intraocular pressure [19.55 ± 2.08 versus 11.65 ± 1.64, mmHg, p = 0.001], and automated visual field pattern standard deviation [4.13 ± 6.96 versus 1.64 ± 0.45, dB, p = 0.001] were significantly more than in control. The visual acuity [0.41 ± 0.29 versus 1.00 ± 0.00, p = 0.001], foveal visual sensitivity [25.92 ± 6.88 versus 33.48 ± 1.75, dB, p = 0.001], and automated visual field mean deviation [−9.63 ± 10.58 versus 0.07 ± 1.54, dB, p = 0.001] were significantly less in cases than in control. Among VEP variables, pattern reversal latency N145 [149.00 ± 15.75 versus 137.52 ± 15.20, ms, p = 0.011], flash amplitude N75 [2.18 ± .57 versus 1.47 ± .38, μV, p = 0.001], and flash amplitude N145 [1.99 ± .39 versus 1.43 ± .38, μV, p = 0.001] were increased in cases. The pattern reversal amplitude N75 [1.97 ± .35 versus 2.47 ± .58, μV, p = 0.001], amplitude P100 [3.09 ± .46 versus 6.07 ± 1.44, μV, p = 0.001], and amplitude N145 [2.21 ± .58 versus 4.45 ± 1.99, μV, p = 0.001] were decreased in cases.

Conclusions

POAG caused glaucomatous damage to optic pathway.

Evaluation of hemifield sector analysis protocol in multifocal visual evoked potential objective perimetry for the diagnosis and early detection of glaucomatous field defects

Purpose

Multifocal visual evoked potential (mfVEP) is a newly introduced method used for objective visual field assessment. Several analysis protocols have been tested to identify early visual field losses in glaucoma patients using the mfVEP technique, some were successful in detection of field defects, which were comparable to the standard automated perimetry (SAP) visual field assessment, and others were not very informative and needed more adjustment and research work. In this study we implemented a novel analysis approach and evaluated its validity and whether it could be used effectively for early detection of visual field defects in glaucoma.

Methods

Three groups were tested in this study; normal controls (38 eyes), glaucoma patients (36 eyes) and glaucoma suspect patients (38 eyes). All subjects had a two standard Humphrey field analyzer (HFA) test 24-2 and a single mfVEP test undertaken in one session. Analysis of the mfVEP results was done using the new analysis protocol; the hemifield sector analysis (HSA) protocol. Analysis of the HFA was done using the standard grading system.

Results

Analysis of mfVEP results showed that there was a statistically significant difference between the three groups in the mean signal to noise ratio (ANOVA test, p < 0.001 with a 95% confidence interval). The difference between superior and inferior hemispheres in all subjects were statistically significant in the glaucoma patient group in all 11 sectors (t-test, p < 0.001), partially significant in 5 / 11 (t-test, p < 0.01), and no statistical difference in most sectors of the normal group (1 / 11 sectors was significant, t-test, p < 0.9). Sensitivity and specificity of the HSA protocol in detecting glaucoma was 97% and 86%, respectively, and for glaucoma suspect patients the values were 89% and 79%, respectively.

Conclusions

The new HSA protocol used in the mfVEP testing can be applied to detect glaucomatous visual field defects in both glaucoma and glaucoma suspect patients. Using this protocol can provide information about focal visual field differences across the horizontal midline, which can be utilized to differentiate between glaucoma and normal subjects. Sensitivity and specificity of the mfVEP test showed very promising results and correlated with other anatomical changes in glaucoma field loss.

Electroretinogram and visual-evoked potential assessment of retinal and central visual function in a rat ocular hypertension model of glaucoma

PURPOSE/AIM

The aim of the study was to investigate the long-term functional changes that may occur in the retina and visual cortex in a rat ocular hypertension (OHT) model of glaucoma, used in our lab for treatment studies, using electroretinogram (ERG) and visual-evoked potential (VEP) cortical recordings in order to test the hypothesis that experimental glaucoma has differential retinal and central effects.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Experimental glaucoma was induced unilaterally in Dark Agouti rats using hypertonic saline injection into the episcleral veins. After 3, 8, 16 and 26 weeks, ERGs and VEPs were recorded under scotopic conditions using brief full-field white flashes (10 μcd s m(-2) to 10.4 cd s m(-2)) and under photopic conditions using a rod-adapting background and white light flashes (0.13-10.4 cd s m(-2)).

RESULTS

At 16 and 26 weeks after OHT induction, there was a significant reduction in the amplitudes of the a- (50% and 30% of unoperated eye values, respectively) and b-waves (55% and 40%, respectively) of the scotopic ERG and the b-waves of the photopic ERG (55% and 45%, respectively) in the glaucomatous eyes. However, no significant changes in the VEPs simultaneously recorded over the visual cortex were seen at any of the time points.

CONCLUSIONS

The reductions in ERG amplitudes suggest that this model of glaucoma not only causes retinal ganglion cell (RGC) degeneration but also degeneration of the outer retinal cells, and this was confirmed by histology showing a reduction in the outer retinal layers in the glaucomatous eyes. Cortical VEPs did not show detrimental effects suggesting that the retinal damage in this model was not extensive enough to be detected with the VEP methods used or that there could be central compensation in this model of glaucoma.

The role of hemifield sector analysis in multifocal visual evoked potential objective perimetry in the early detection of glaucomatous visual field defects

Objective

The purpose of this study was to examine the effectiveness of a new analysis method of mfVEP objective perimetry in the early detection of glaucomatous visual field defects compared to the gold standard technique.

Methods and patients

Three groups were tested in this study; normal controls (38 eyes), glaucoma patients (36 eyes), and glaucoma suspect patients (38 eyes). All subjects underwent two standard 24-2 visual field tests: one with the Humphrey Field Analyzer and a single mfVEP test in one session. Analysis of the mfVEP results was carried out using the new analysis protocol: the hemifield sector analysis protocol.

Results

Analysis of the mfVEP showed that the signal to noise ratio (SNR) difference between superior and inferior hemifields was statistically significant between the three groups (analysis of variance, P < 0.001 with a 95% confidence interval, 2.82, 2.89 for normal group; 2.25, 2.29 for glaucoma suspect group; 1.67, 1.73 for glaucoma group). The difference between superior and inferior hemifield sectors and hemi-rings was statistically significant in 11/11 pair of sectors and hemi-rings in the glaucoma patients group (t-test P < 0.001), statistically significant in 5/11 pairs of sectors and hemi-rings in the glaucoma suspect group (t-test P < 0.01), and only 1/11 pair was statistically significant (t-test P < 0.9). The sensitivity and specificity of the hemifield sector analysis protocol in detecting glaucoma was 97% and 86% respectively and 89% and 79% in glaucoma suspects. These results showed that the new analysis protocol was able to confirm existing visual field defects detected by standard perimetry, was able to differentiate between the three study groups with a clear distinction between normal patients and those with suspected glaucoma, and was able to detect early visual field changes not detected by standard perimetry. In addition, the distinction between normal and glaucoma patients was especially clear and significant using this analysis.

Conclusion

The new hemifield sector analysis protocol used in mfVEP testing can be used to detect glaucomatous visual field defects in both glaucoma and glaucoma suspect patients. Using this protocol, it can provide information about focal visual field differences across the horizontal midline, which can be utilized to differentiate between glaucoma and normal subjects. The sensitivity and specificity of the mfVEP test showed very promising results and correlated with other anatomical changes in glaucomatous visual field loss. The intersector analysis protocol can detect early field changes not detected by the standard Humphrey Field Analyzer test.

Understanding disparities among diagnostic technologies in glaucoma

OBJECTIVE

To investigate causes of disagreement among 3 glaucoma diagnostic techniques: standard automated achromatic perimetry (SAP), the multifocal visual evoked potential technique (mfVEP), and optical coherence tomography (OCT).

METHODS

In a prospective cross-sectional study, 138 eyes of 69 patients with glaucomatous optic neuropathy were tested using SAP, the mfVEP, and OCT. Eyes with the worse and better mean deviations (MDs) were analyzed separately. If the results of 2 tests were consistent for the presence of an abnormality in the same topographic site, that abnormality was considered a true glaucoma defect. If a third test missed that abnormality (false-negative result), the reasons for disparity were investigated.

RESULTS

Eyes with worse MD (mean [SD], -6.8 [8.0] dB) had better agreements among tests than did eyes with better MD (-2.5 [3.5] dB, P<.01). For the 94 of 138 hemifields with abnormalities of the more advanced eyes, the 3 tests were consistent in showing the same hemifield abnormality in 50 hemifields (53%), and at least 2 tests were abnormal in 65 of the 94 hemifields (69%). The potential explanations for the false-negative results fell into 2 general categories: inherent limitations of each technique to detect distinct features of glaucoma and individual variability and the distribution of normative values used to define statistically significant abnormalities.

CONCLUSIONS

All the cases of disparity could be explained by known limitations of each technique and interindividual variability, suggesting that the agreement among diagnostic tests may be better than summary statistics suggest and that disagreements between tests do not indicate discordance in the structure-function relationship.

Multifocal visual evoked potentials for early glaucoma detection

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

To compare multifocal visual evoked potentials (mfVEP) with other detection methods in early open-angle glaucoma.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Ten patients with suspected glaucoma and 5 with early open-angle glaucoma underwent mfVEP, standard automated perimetry (SAP), short-wave automated perimetry, frequency-doubling technology perimetry, and nerve fiber layer optical coherence tomography. Nineteen healthy control subjects underwent mfVEP and SAP for comparison. Comparisons between groups involving continuous variables were made using independent t tests; for categorical variables, Fisher's exact test was used.

RESULTS

Monocular mfVEP cluster defects were associated with an increased SAP pattern standard deviation (P = .0195). Visual fields that showed interocular mfVEP cluster defects were more likely to also show superior quadrant nerve fiber layer thinning by OCT (P = .0152).

CONCLUSION

Multifocal visual evoked potential cluster defects are associated with a functional and an anatomic measure that both relate to glaucomatous optic neuropathy.

Clinical use of multifocal visual-evoked potentials in a glaucoma practice: a prospective study

PURPOSE

To test a framework that describes how the multifocal visual-evoked potential (mfVEP) technique is used in a particular glaucoma practice.

METHODS

In this prospective, descriptive study, glaucoma suspects, ocular hypertensives and glaucoma patients were referred for mfVEP testing by a single glaucoma specialist over a 2-year period. All patients underwent standard automated perimetry (SAP) and mfVEP testing within 3 months. Two hundred and ten patients (420 eyes) were referred for mfVEP testing for the following reasons: (1) normal SAP tests suspected of early functional loss (ocular hypertensives, n = 43; and glaucoma suspects on the basis of suspicious optic disks, n = 52); (2) normal-tension glaucoma patients with suspected central SAP defects (n = 33); and (3) SAP abnormalities needing confirmation (n = 82).

RESULTS

All the glaucoma suspects with normal SAP and mfVEP results remained untreated. Of those with abnormal mfVEP results, 68 % (15/22) were treated because the abnormal regions on the mfVEP were consistent with the abnormal regions seen during clinical examination of the optic disk. The mfVEP was abnormal in 86 % (69/80) of eyes with glaucomatous optic neuropathy and SAP damage, even though it did not result in an altered treatment regimen. In NTG patients, the mfVEP showed central defects in 44 % (12 of 27) of the eyes with apparently normal central fields and confirmed central scotomata in 92 % (36 of 39), leading to more rigorous surveillance of these patients.

CONCLUSIONS

In a clinical practice, the mfVEP was used when clinical examination and subjective visual fields provided insufficient or conflicting information. This information influenced clinical management.

Evaluation of the visual function in obstructive sleep apnea syndrome patients and normal-tension glaucoma by means of the multifocal visual evoked potentials

BACKGROUND

This study was designed to objectively evaluate visual function and the causal relationship between sleep apnea and optic nerve dysfunction in patients with obstructive sleep apnea syndrome (OSAS) with or without diagnosis of normal-tension glaucoma (NTG) using multifocal visual evoked potentials (mfVEP).

METHODS

This observational, cross-sectional study assessed 20 patients with recently diagnosed OSAS with or without NTG. Diagnosis of sleep apnea was based on overnight polysomnography (ApnoeScreen). All participants underwent a complete physical and ophthalmologic examination. MfVEP recordings obtained using VERIS software (Electro-Diagnostic Imaging, San Mateo, USA), SITA-standard 30-2 automated perimetry (Humphrey Visual Field Analyzer II) and optic coherence tomography (Topcon 3D OCT-1000) exams were performed to evaluate the changes.

RESULTS

Abnormal mfVEP amplitudes defects (interocular and monocular probability analysis) were found in 40% of the eyes in the non-glaucoma group and in 90% of eyes of the NTG patients. As well, delayed mfVEP latencies (interocular and monocular probability analysis) were seen in 30 and 60% of the eyes of the non-glaucoma and NTG groups, respectively. The average RNFL (retinal nerve fiber layer) thickness was significantly reduced in the NTG eyes compared to the control database and the non-glaucoma eyes. On the Humphrey Visual Field total deviation analysis, all the NTG eyes showed significant clusters of abnormal points but none was detected in the non-glaucoma group eyes. However, the mfVEP amplitude and latency did not show any significant correlation with the standard perimetry and OCT variables, because the mfVEP technique was able to detect far more early visual defects in these patients. Systolic blood pressure, sleep efficiency, arousal index, mean and minimum arterial oxygen saturation (SaO(2)), time SaO(2) < 90%, oxyhemoglobin desaturation index, number of central and mixed apneas and apnea-hipopneas index were shown to be significantly correlated with mfVEP amplitude and latency.

CONCLUSIONS

A significant incidence of subclinical optic nerve involvement, not detected with other structural and psychophysics diagnostic techniques was seen by means of the mfVEP. In this sense, the mfVEP may be a useful diagnostic tool in the clinic for early diagnosis and monitoring of optic nerve function abnormalities in patients with OSAS.

Effects of acutely lowering intraocular pressure on the results of multifocal visual evoked potential testing

PURPOSE

There have been many reports in the literature on the apparent reversal of optic nerve cupping in patients with glaucoma after lowering intraocular pressure (IOP) on clinical examination, as well as improvement in visual field testing, and increased nerve fibre layer thickness on optical coherence tomography. No studies to date have looked at improvement of multifocal visually evoked potentials (mfVEP) after lowering IOP.

METHODS

This was a prospective study of twenty consecutive patients with elevated IOP seen in the glaucoma department of Wills Eye Institute. Patients who met the inclusion criteria for this study had a complete eye examination including IOP measurement and underwent testing with mfVEP, Heidelberg Retinal Tomograph (HRT) and static achromatic automated perimetry with SITA-Standard 24-2 program Humphrey visual field (HVF) studies at baseline and 2 h post-IOP reduction. A minimum of 30% IOP reduction was required. IOP changes were then compared with various parameters of mfVEP, HRT and HVF using Spearman rank correlation coefficients.

RESULTS

The Spearman rank correlation values between change in IOP versus various parameters were calculated: Accumap severity index (ASI), 0.37 (p = 0.14); Accumap superior hemifield, 0.049 (p = 0.85); Accumap inferior hemifield, 0.030 (p = 0.91); HVF mean deviation, 0.081 (p = 0.76); HRT rim area, 0.17 (p = 0.51); HRT cup area, -0.006 (p = 0.98). Weak positive but insignificant correlations were seen for all parameters except cup area.

CONCLUSIONS

This pilot study failed to confirm statistically significant correlations between IOP reduction and changes in Accumap, HVF and HRT measures, although positive correlations were seen for most measures.

Identifying preperimetric functional loss in glaucoma: a blue-on-yellow multifocal visual evoked potentials study

PURPOSE

To determine the ability of blue-on-yellow multifocal visual evoked potentials (BonY mfVEP) to identify functional loss in preperimetric glaucoma.

DESIGN

Prospective case series.

PARTICIPANTS

Thirty patients with glaucomatous optic discs and normal standard visual fields.

METHODS

All patients underwent BonY mfVEP, dilated optic disc stereophotography, and optical coherence tomography (Fast RNFL protocol). Optic disc photographs were assessed by 2 independent examiners in a masked fashion.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The mfVEP amplitude asymmetry and latency values were analyzed and compared topographically with findings of disc assessment. Average retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) thickness, RNFL asymmetry, and sectors with RNFL thinning were compared between patients with and without mfVEP defects.

RESULTS

Fourteen (46.7%) patients demonstrated significant abnormality on amplitude asymmetry deviation plots of BonY mfVEP. In all 14 cases, the defect was monocular and corresponded to the eye with the worse disc. In 13 of 14 patients, the defect also corresponded to the location of the worst affected rim. Average RNFL thickness of eyes with mfVEP defects was 81.2+/-9.9 microm, significantly lower than that of patients without defects (90+/-10.5 microm; P = 0.035). Mean asymmetry of RNFL (better minus worse eye) also was significantly higher for patients with mfVEP defects compared with those without such defects (9.0+/-6.4 microm vs. 3.0+/-7 microm; P = 0.03). Average latency of both eyes of glaucomatous patients was delayed compared with that of controls, with no difference in latency between worse and better eyes of glaucoma patients. There was no association of latency delay with either the location of disc changes or mfVEP amplitude defects.

CONCLUSIONS

Amplitude asymmetry of the BonY mfVEP seems to be a promising tool to identify functional loss in preperimetric glaucoma.

FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE(S)

Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found after the references.

Effect of recording duration on the diagnostic performance of multifocal visual-evoked potentials in high-risk ocular hypertension and early glaucoma

PURPOSE

To evaluate the effect on diagnostic performance of reducing multifocal visual-evoked potential (mfVEP) recording duration from 16 to 8 minutes per eye.

METHODS

Both eyes of 185 individuals with high-risk ocular hypertension or early glaucoma were studied. Two 8-minute mfVEP recordings were obtained for each eye in an ABBA order using VERIS. The first recording for each eye was compared against single run (1-Run) mfVEP normative data; the average of both recordings for each eye was compared against 2-Run normative data. Visual fields (VFs) were obtained by standard automated perimetry (SAP) within 22.3+/-27.0 days of the mfVEP. Stereo disc photographs and Heidelberg Retina Tomograph images were obtained together, within 24.8+/-50.4 days of the mfVEP and 33.1+/-62.9 days of SAP. Masked experts graded disc photographs as either glaucomatous optic neuropathy or normal. The overall Moorfields Regression Analysis result from the Heidelberg Retina Tomograph was used as a separate diagnostic classification. Thus, 4 diagnostic standards were applied in total, 2 based on optic disc structure alone and 2 others based on disc structure and SAP.

RESULTS

Agreement between the 1-Run and 2-Run mfVEP was 90%. Diagnostic performance of the 1-Run mfVEP was similar to that of the 2-Run mfVEP for all 4 diagnostic standards. Sensitivity was slightly higher for the 2-Run mfVEP, whereas specificity was slightly higher for the 1-Run mfVEP.

CONCLUSIONS

If higher sensitivity is sought, the 2-Run mfVEP will provide better discrimination between groups of eyes with relatively high signal-to-noise ratio (eg, early glaucoma or high-risk suspects). But if higher specificity is a more important goal, the 1-Run mfVEP provides adequate sensitivity and requires only half the test time. Considered alongside prior studies, the present results suggest that the 1-Run mfVEP is an efficient way to confirm (or refute) the extent of VF loss in patients with moderate or advanced glaucoma, particularly in those with unreliable VFs, including malingering or other "functional" forms of VF loss.