Evolution of Off-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting over 15 Years: A Single-Institution Experience of 14,030 Cases

Two decades of off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery: Harefield experience

The morbidity and mortality associated with conventional coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) attributed to invasiveness of cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) has been well documented. Recognition of this invasiveness with a focus centered on abolishing, or at least reducing the CPB associated morbidity and mortality led to the resurgence of off-pump coronary artery bypass (OPCAB) surgery nearly two decades ago. At about the same time, OPCAB was adopted at Harefield hospital partly as an institutional drive to promote innovation and partly as a strategy to improve outcomes. What was deemed as a challenging technique initially and practiced by a single surgeon has now become a valid substitute to conventional CABG for achieving complete myocardial revascularization. This strategy now accounts for more than 50% of all coronary artery surgery operations at Harefield hospital and is systematically used to treat all coronary anatomies; achieve complete revascularization by accessing all territories subtended by main coronary arteries; and accomplish equivalent quality grafts without restriction in vascular conduit usage. This review article provides an overview of the evolution of OPCAB surgery at an institution with a well-established OPCAB program confirming that as surgeons' experience matures, OPCAB surgery permits safe and effective total myocardial revascularization in virtually all patients with multivessel coronary artery disease.

Coronary artery bypass surgery: beating heart or cardiopulmonary bypass?

In this study, we examined the early results for patients who underwent beating heart coronary bypass surgery and compared these results with those of conventional coronary bypass surgery.A total of 1094 patients who underwent isolated coronary artery bypass surgery between January 2009 and December 2011 in our clinic were included in this study. Seventy-three patients in whom cardiopulmonary bypass was not used (group 1) were compared to 1021 patients in whom cardiopulmonary bypass was used (group 2).The mean age was 60.7 ± 9.3 in group 1 and 58.9 ± 9.7 in group 2 (P > 0.05). There was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of gender, or the coexistence of diabetes mellitus (DM), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), and hypertension (P > 0.05). There was no significant difference between group 1 and group 2 in terms of development of postoperative atrial fibrillation (AF), use of an intra-aortic balloon pump, need for re-operation for bleeding, or duration of hospital stay and intensive care unit stay (P > 0.05). The need for inotropic support and the amount of mediastinal drainage were less in group 1 than in group 2 (P = 0.002, P < 0.001). The incidences of postoperative cerebrovascular accident, development of chronic renal failure, and sternal wound infection did not significantly differ between the groups (P > 0.05). There was no mortality in group 1, whereas it was calculated as 1.8% in group 2 (P = 0.63).Beating heart coronary artery bypass surgery decreases the need for inotropic support and transfusion.

Off-pump coronary artery bypass: techniques, pitfalls, and results

In an attempt to advance the surgical treatment of coronary artery disease, surgeons sought a way to offer the proven benefits of coronary revascularization and avoid the side effects of cardiopulmonary bypass by performing revascularization in the beating heart (off-pump coronary artery bypass). This review will describe the development and refinement of the technique, pitfalls to its widespread adoption, and an up-to-date assessment of current results.