Arterial Pressure-Based Stroke Volume and Functional Hemodynamic Monitoring

Hemodynamic Monitoring by Smartphone—Preliminary Report from a Comparative Prospective Observational Study

Background: Advanced hemodynamic monitoring supports making therapeutic decisions in critically ill patients. New technologies, including mobile health, have been introduced into the hemodynamic monitoring armamentarium. However, each monitoring method has potential limitations—content, technical and organizational. The aim of this study was to assess the comparability between measurements obtained with two arterial pressure cardiac output methods: Capstesia™ smartphone hemodynamic software (CS) and LiDCO Rapid™ uncalibrated hemodynamic monitor (LR). Methods: The initial analysis included 16 patients in the period 06–09 2020 without limitations that could make the results obtained unreliable. Eighty pairs of cardiac output measurements were obtained. The comparability of cardiac output results obtained with both methods was assessed using the Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient (R), the intra-class correlation (CCC) and the Bland–Altman curves analysis (B-A). Results: The median (IQR) cardiac output measured with CS and LR were 4.6 (3.9–5.7) and 5.5 (4.6–7.4) L min⁻¹, respectively. In the B-A analysis, CS cardiac output values were on average 1.2 (95% CI −2.1–4.4) L min^-1 lower than LR values. The correlation between cardiac output with CS and LR was moderate (r = 0.5; p = 0.04). After adjusting for the presence of the dicrotic notch on the pulse waveform, in the group of eight patients with a visible dicrotic notch, the CS and LR results differed by only 0.1 (95% CI −0.8–1.1) L min⁻¹, the correlation between CS and LR was close to complete (r = 0.96; p < 0.001), and the percentage error was 40%, with a CCC-CS of 0.98 (95% CI 0.95–0.99). Conclusions: The Capstesia^TM smartphone software can provide an alternative method of cardiac output assessment in patients meeting arterial pressure cardiac output evaluation criteria with a clearly discernible dicrotic notch on the arterial pulse pressure waveform. It is necessary to confirm the obtained observations on a larger group of patients; however, it may potentially make objective hemodynamic measurements ubiquitous in patients with invasive arterial pressure monitoring with a clearly discernible dicrotic notch.

Passive Leg-Raising and Prediction of Fluid Responsiveness: Systematic Review

Fluid boluses are often administered with the aim of improving tissue hypoperfusion in shock. However, only approximately 50% of patients respond to fluid administration with a clinically significant increase in stroke volume. Fluid overload can exacerbate pulmonary edema, precipitate respiratory failure, and prolong mechanical ventilation. Therefore, it is important to predict which hemodynamically unstable patients will increase their stroke volume in response to fluid administration, thereby avoiding deleterious effects. Passive leg-raising (lowering the head and upper torso from a 45° angle to lying supine [flat] while simultaneously raising the legs to a 45° angle) is a transient, reversible autotransfusion that simulates a fluid bolus and is performed to predict a response to fluid administration. The article reviews the accuracy, physiological effects, and factors affecting the response to passive-leg raising to predict fluid responsiveness in critically ill patients.

Research at the Bedside: It Makes A Difference

Research at the bedside makes a difference for our patients, and also for our nurses. However, it is now time to broaden our focus from research on interventions or events at a narrow point in time to research that addresses care across the continuum. This continuum may start at the point of injury, such as the battlefield through en route care delivered during the 8000-mile journey home for our wounded warriors, or for critically ill patients as they move between the emergency department, operating room, and intensive care unit. This focus also requires researchers to consider "care within context," that is, research- and evidence-based practice tailored to the unique conditions of the care environment. Beyond conducting research and developing new knowledge is the challenge of translating evidence into practice. A culture of inquiry is a critical element in the successful translation of evidence into practice. In a culture of inquiry, nurses are encouraged to question and evaluate their practice, provide evidence-based care, and actively participate in and lead clinical inquiry. This article draws from a program of applied clinical research reflecting care across the continuum within both military and civilian health care settings and discusses how the application of these research findings and the advancement of a culture of inquiry make a difference for both patients and nurses.