Treatment of Intractable Pruritus in Drug Induced Cholestasis with Albumin Dialysis: A Report of Two Cases

The effects of six antidepressants on electrolytes, hepatic and renal functions, and glycolipid metabolism in patients with major depressive disorder

BACKGROUND

Most antidepressants with similar pharmacological characteristics exhibit comparable therapeutic efficacy but differ in side effects. Therefore, we used a retrospective design to compare biochemical changes induced by six antidepressants and identify differences among them.

METHODS

Case records from 1706 hospitalized patients with major depressive disorder (MDD) receiving antidepressant monotherapy were divided into six groups based on the specific antidepressants used: paroxetine, sertraline, fluoxetine, escitalopram, venlafaxine, and duloxetine. Electrolytes, hepatic and renal functions, body weight, and glycolipid metabolism were assessed at baseline and 2 weeks post-antidepressant initiation. Paired analysis was used for comparing the changes prior to and after administration within each group, and analysis of covariance was used for evaluating the distinctions among the six groups.

RESULTS

After 2 weeks of treatment, significant decreases in serum sodium and chloride levels were observed with venlafaxine, duloxetine, and fluoxetine, while potassium, phosphorus, and carbon dioxide concentrations tended to increase across all six antidepressants. In terms of hepatic indicators, these antidepressants significantly elevated alanine aminotransferase (ALT), aspartate aminotransferase (AST), and γ-glutamyl transpeptidase (GGT) levels, with duloxetine showing the most pronounced changes from baseline, while decreasing total and direct bilirubin. Sertraline effectively reduced uric acid, although changes in renal indicators were mild with other antidepressants. Notably, these antidepressants were associated with an unfavorable lipid profile, particularly elevated triglycerides and cholesterol, but they lowered blood glucose during the acute phase.

LIMITATION

Residual confounding may indirectly influence the retrospective outcomes.

CONCLUSION

Early biochemical changes can distinguish differences among antidepressants and guide individualized medication.

Antidepressants- and antipsychotics-induced hepatotoxicity

Drug-induced liver injury (DILI) is a serious health burden. It has diverse clinical presentations that can escalate to acute liver failure. The worldwide increase in the use of psychotropic drugs, their long-term use on a daily basis, common comorbidities of psychiatric and metabolic disorders, and polypharmacy in psychiatric patients increase the incidence of psychotropics-induced DILI. During the last 2 decades, hepatotoxicity of various antidepressants (ADs) and antipsychotics (APs) received much attention. Comprehensive review and discussion of accumulated literature data concerning this issue are performed in this study, as hepatotoxic effects of most commonly prescribed ADs and APs are classified, described, and discussed. The review focuses on ADs and APs characterized by the risk of causing liver damage and highlights the ones found to cause life-threatening or severe DILI cases. In parallel, an overview of hepatic oxidative stress, inflammation, and steatosis underlying DILI is provided, followed by extensive review and discussion of the pathophysiology of AD- and AP-induced DILI revealed in case reports, and animal and in vitro studies. The consequences of some ADs and APs ability to affect drug-metabolizing enzymes and therefore provoke drug–drug interactions are also addressed. Continuous collecting of data on drugs, mechanisms, and risk factors for DILI, as well as critical data reviewing, is crucial for easier DILI diagnosis and more efficient risk assessment of AD- and AP-induced DILI. Higher awareness of ADs and APs hepatotoxicity is the prerequisite for their safe use and optimal dosing.

Plasmapheresis for Refractory Pruritus due to Drug-Induced Cholestasis

Pruritus can be a distressing symptom seen in various cholestatic disorders. It is treated with medications like bile acid sequestrants. Drug-induced cholestasis usually resolves with withdrawal of the causative medication. We describe a case of refractory pruritus due to drug-induced cholestasis, not improved with withdrawal of the drug, managed effectively with multiple sessions of plasmapheresis.

Diagnosis and Management of Chronic Pruritus: An Expert Consensus Review

The aim of this study is to formulate the best clinical practice in the diagnosis and management of chronic pruritus (CP). We searched PubMed, EMBASE, Scopus, Web of Science, and the WHO's regional databases, for studies on "Diagnosis and management of chronic pruritus" from January 1, 2014, to July 31, 2015. We included programmatic reports and hand-searched references of published reviews and articles. Two independent reviewers screened articles and extracted data. We screened 87 of 95 studies that contained qualitative data. Avoid: Dry climate, heat, alcohol compress, ice packs, frequent bathing and washing, intake of very hot and spicy food, intake of alcohol, contact with irritant substances, excitement, strain and stress, and allergens. Using: Mild nonalkaline soaps, moisturizers, bathing oils, lukewarm water while bathing, soft cotton clothing and night creams/lotions, relaxation therapy, autogenic training, psychosocial education, educating patients to cope with itching and scratching, and educational programs. Especially use of moisturizers is considered important. In addition, symptomatic treatment options include systemic H1 antihistamines and topical corticosteroids. Symptomatic therapy directed toward the cause (hepatic, renal, atopic, polycythemia, etc.). If refractory or cause is unknown, consider capsaicin, calcineurin inhibitors for localized pruritus and naltrexone, pregabalin, ultraviolet therapy, Cyclosporine for generalized itching. CP is quite frequent finding associated with skin and systemic diseases in the overall population. It is known to significantly affect quality life score of an individual and also adds burden on the health-care cost. A specific recommendation for treatment of CP is difficult as a result of varied and diverse possibility of underlying diseases associated with CP.

Antidepressant-lnduced Liver Injury

Objective:

To review principles of drug-induced liver injury (DILI), summarize characteristics of antidepressant-mediated liver Injury, and provide recommendations for monitoring and management.

Data Sources:

A search relating to antidepressant-induced liver injury was performed using MEDLINE (1966–March 2007). Search terms included antidepressant, cholestasis, hepatotoxicity, jaundice, liver injury, toxic hepatitis, and transaminases. Reference citations not Identified in the initial database search were also utilized.

Study Selection and Data Extraction:

All English-language case reports, letters, and review articles identified from the data sources were used. Case reports and letters relating to hepatotoxicity from antidepressant overdose were excluded.

Data Synthesis:

Antidepressant-induced liver injury described in published cases were of the idiopathic type and, by definition, cannot be predicted based on dose or specific risk factors. Paroxetine had the largest number of cases within the selective serotonin-reuptake inhibitor class. Nefazodone, a serotonin–norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor, appeared to have the most serious cases and is the only antidepressant agent that carries a Food and Drug Administration Black Box Warning regarding hepatotoxiciiy. The tricyclic antidepressants and monoamine oxidase Inhibitors are capable of producing hepatotoxicity, but fewer cases with these agents have been reported in the past 15 years, possibly due to a decline in their use. Causality has not been well established in all reports due to the concurrent use of other drugs and/or underlying liver disease.

Conclusions:

Most antidepressant agents have the potential to produce idiopathic liver injury. There is no way to prevent idiopathic DILI, but the severity of the reaction may be minimized with prompt recognition and early withdrawal of the agent. The clinician must be careful to provide ongoing therapy of the underlying depressive disorder and be aware of possible drug discontinuation syndromes should potential hepatotoxicity be suspected.

Blood cytokine, chemokine and gene expression in cholestasis patients with intractable pruritis treated with a molecular adsorbent recirculating system: a case series

BACKGROUND

The molecular adsorbent recirculating system (MARS) is an albumin-dialysis modality that has been investigated predominantly in patients with acute and acute-on-chronic liver failure.

OBJECTIVES

To report the clinical efficacy and safety of MARS therapy for intractable pruritus in cholestasis patients with stable chronic liver disease, characterizing the impact of MARS on cytokine levels and on the transcriptome in the blood compartment.

METHODS

MARS therapy was performed on three patients with cholestatic liver disease using 8 h runs for two consecutive days. The expression levels of 65 cytokines⁄chemokines and 24,000 genes were profiled by Luminex (Luminex Corporation, USA) and microarray, respectively.

RESULTS

A quality-of-life assessment demonstrated a marked improvement during therapy, which was sustained in two of three patients. No bleeding or infectious complications were observed. Bile acid levels were markedly reduced following MARS (mean [± SD] pretreatment 478.9±112.2 µmol⁄L versus post-treatment 89.7±68.8 µmol⁄L). Concordant decreases in cytokine⁄chemokine levels were noted for interleukin (IL)-1beta, IL-2, IL-6, IL-8, IL-12 (p40), RANTES, tranforming growth factor-alpha, tumour necrosis factor-alpha and thrombopoietin following MARS. On microarray profiling, biologically relevant concordant changes among all patients were evident for 20 different genes (10 upregulated and 10 downregulated). The upregulation of several potentially immune suppressive⁄regulatory genes (eg, early growth response 3 [EGR-3], ephrin-A2 [EFNA2] and serum amyloid A1 [SAA1]), concurrent with downregulation of genes involved in innate immunity (eg, toll-like receptor 4 interactor with leucine-rich repeats [TRIL]) and inflammation (eg, ephrin receptor B1 [EPHB1]), was observed.

CONCLUSIONS

This investigative approach offers new insights into intractable pruritus and suggests future therapeutic targets. The clinical benefit of MARS in cholestasis patients with intractable pruritus may not exclusively result from filtration of pruritogens, but also from systemic changes in cytokine⁄chemokine levels and changes in gene expression of blood cells.

Molecular Adsorbents Recirculating System dialysis in children with cholestatic pruritus

BACKGROUND

Cholestatic pruritus may severely compromise quality of life. The Molecular Adsorbents Recirculating System (MARS) allows removal of pruritogenic substances without exposure to foreign proteins. Pediatric data, however, are scant.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed the efficacy of MARS in three boys with severe cholestatic pruritus. They received a total of 135 MARS sessions during 8, 4, and 13 months prior to liver transplantation. Total serum bilirubin and bile acids were monitored, and pruritus was assessed by a numerical rating scale (NRS 0 = no pruritus, 10 = maximal pruritus).

RESULTS

MARS sessions were initially performed three times weekly at a mean duration of 6.3 ± 1.4 h. Sessions could be reduced to once weekly and once every other week in two patients. Pre-MARS plasma bile acid concentrations averaged 207 ± 67 μmol/l. They declined to 67 ± 9%, 48 ± 3%, 38 ± 14%, and 37 ± 5% of baseline within 2, 4, 6 and 8 h of therapy, respectively (all p < 0.05). The average interdialytic increase of plasma bile acids was 34 ± 33 μmol/l per day. Mean NRS score decreased from 6.5 ± 2.3 to 3.3 ± 2.9 (p < 0.01). Skin lesions from itching disappeared. All MARS treatments were well tolerated.

CONCLUSION

MARS dialysis substantially reduces cholestatic pruritus in children refractory to pharmacological treatment.

Which psychotropic medications induce hepatotoxicity?

OBJECTIVE

Safe prescribing practices to minimize pharmaceutically induced liver damage or worsening of preexisting conditions require knowledge about medicines with hepatotoxic potential. This paper reviews psychotropic medications and their effects on the liver.

METHODS

A MEDLINE search was performed utilizing the phrase "drug-induced liver injury" with various categories of psychiatric drugs. Only articles written in English were utilized.

RESULTS

Hepatotoxicity can be acute or chronic in nature. Medication discontinuation is necessary in acute forms, while close monitoring is required in milder forms of medication-induced chronic liver damage. Nefazodone, pemoline and/or tacrine are the highest offenders. Carbamazepine and valproate products (e.g., divalproex) can lead to this adverse event and should be avoided in patients with liver disease, persons with alcohol misuse or those consuming high doses of acetaminophen.

CONCLUSION

Knowing the risk levels associated with various medicines is important; prescribing multiple drugs with hepatotoxic effects should be avoided. One should educate patients about early warning signs of liver injury. Always provide clinical and laboratory monitoring before and during the use of hepatotoxic drugs. Clinical features and laboratory results govern medication prescribing with ongoing risk-to-benefit ratio assessment during pharmacotherapy.

Artificial extracorporeal liver support therapy in patients with severe liver failure

Severe liver failure is common and carries a high mortality risk in patients with both acute and acute-on-chronic liver failure. The failing liver constitutes a medical emergency, and in many cases liver transplantation is the only definite treatment. Extracorporeal liver support can be employed as a strategy for bridging to transplantation or recovery. This article focuses on options for artificial (nonbiological) extracorporeal treatment: single-pass albumin dialysis, fractionated plasma separation and adsorption (Prometheus(®)) and the molecular adsorbent recirculatory system. Their different principles, potential advantages and indications are discussed. Despite proven biochemical efficacy, there are little data regarding clinical end points. Thus far, molecular adsorbent recirculatory system therapy in acute and acute-on-chronic liver failure showed no survival benefit compared with standard medical therapy. Prometheus therapy showed reduced mortality in subgroups of higher severity of disease compared with standard medical therapy. Nevertheless, the value of extracorporeal liver support remains to be corroborated by further clinical studies that include the optimal timing, mode, intensity and duration of this treatment.

Model for end-stage liver disease exceptions in the context of the French model for end-stage liver disease score-based liver allocation system

Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) score-based allocation systems have been adopted by most countries in Europe and North America. Indeed, the MELD score is a robust marker of early mortality for patients with cirrhosis. Except for extreme values, high pretransplant MELD scores do not significantly affect posttransplant survival. The MELD score can be used to optimize the allocation of allografts according to a sickest first policy. Most often, patients with small hepatocellular carcinomas (HCCs) and low MELD scores receive extra points, which allow them appropriate access to transplantation comparable to the access of patients with advanced cirrhosis and high MELD scores. In addition to patients with advanced cirrhosis and HCC, patients with a number of relatively uncommon conditions have low MELD scores and a poor prognosis in the short term without transplantation but derive excellent benefits from transplantation. These conditions, which correspond to the so-called MELD score exceptions, justify the allocation of a specific score for appropriate access to transplantation. Here we report the conclusions of the French consensus meeting. The goals of this meeting were (1) to identify which conditions merit MELD score exceptions, (2) to list the criteria needed for defining each of these conditions, and (3) to define a reasonable time interval for organ allocation for each MELD exception in the general context of organ shortages. MELD exceptions were discussed in an attempt to reconcile the concepts of transparency, equity, justice, and utility.

Extracorporeal liver support therapy with Prometheus in patients with liver failure in the intensive care unit

Acute liver failure (ALF) and acute-on-chronic liver failure (AoCLF) are associated with a high mortality. In these patients an accumulation of both water-soluble and water-insoluble, protein-bound, metabolic waste products occurs. Conventional extracorporeal blood purification techniques based on diffusion and/or convection such as hemodialysis or hemofiltration may only eliminate small molecular weight, water-soluble compounds. In recent years, fractionated plasma separation and adsorption (FPSA) with the Prometheus system has been introduced for extracorporeal liver support therapy. To date, however, only limited data is available regarding the effect of this treatment on mortality and outcome of patients with advanced liver disease. Here we report on our experience with 23 patients with severe liver failure who were treated with Prometheus in our medical intensive care unit. Fourteen patients had AoCLF, and nine patients experienced ALF. The median bilirubin level at the start of Prometheus therapy was 30.5 mg/dL and the median Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II (APACHE II) score was 26. During 40 individual treatment sessions lasting 5-6 h, Prometheus therapy reduced serum bilirubin levels from 23.7 mg/dL to 15.0 mg/dL (median values) (P < 0.001), and the overall survival was 26%. ALF patients had a better survival compared to AoCLF patients (44% vs. 22%; P = 0.022). Apart from one patient who developed hemodynamic instability during a treatment session, Prometheus therapy was well tolerated without relevant side-effects. In conclusion, extracorporeal liver support therapy with Prometheus is a novel and safe treatment option in patients with severe liver failure. In this series, patients with ALF showed a significantly better outcome with Prometheus therapy compared to AoCLF patients.

Fullerene-C60-modified electrode as a sensitive voltammetric sensor for detection of nandrolone—An anabolic steroid used in doping

The electrochemical behaviour of nandrolone is investigated by cyclic, differential pulse and square-wave voltammetry in phosphate buffer system at fullerene-C60-modified electrode. The modified electrode shows an excellent electrocatalytic activity towards the oxidation of nandrolone resulting in a marked lowering in the peak potential and considerable improvement of the peak current as compared to the electrochemical activity at the bare glassy carbon electrode. The oxidation process is shown to be irreversible and diffusion-controlled. A linear range of 50 microM to 0.1 nM is obtained along with a detection limit and sensitivity of 0.42 nM and 0.358 nA nM(-1), respectively, in square-wave voltammetric technique. A diffusion coefficient of 4.13x10(-8) cm2 s(-1) was found for nandrolone using chronoamperometry. The effect of interferents, stability and reproducibility of the proposed method were also studied. The described method was successfully employed for the determination of nandrolone in human serum and urine samples. A cross-validation of observed results by GC-MS indicates that the results are in good agreement with each other.

Technology Insight: artificial extracorporeal liver support—how does Prometheus® compare with MARS®?

Artificial extracorporeal liver support or 'liver dialysis' has been used in patients with severe liver failure with increasing frequency since the Molecular Adsorbents Recirculating System (MARS), a variant of albumin dialysis, was introduced in 1999. Nevertheless, liver dialysis must still be thought of as experimental because its contribution to improved patient survival has not been proven in large randomized trials. Prometheus is a novel device for fractionated plasma separation via an albumin-permeable filter that was developed to improve removal of albumin-bound toxins. Initial studies have proven clinical use of Prometheus to be feasible and safe. Head-to-head comparisons of Prometheus and MARS have shown treatment with the former to be more efficient with respect to removal of most albumin-bound and water-solved markers. As controlled studies with clinical end points are lacking, it is not known whether the observed greater detoxification capacity of Prometheus will translate into clinical benefit; two small studies indicate that there might be a beneficial effect in hepatic encephalopathy and pruritus. In a recent randomized comparison of MARS and Prometheus, however, hemodynamic improvement was observed in response to MARS, but not Prometheus, treatment. A large randomized controlled trial investigating the effect of Prometheus on survival--the HELIOS study--has been initiated. First results are expected in 2008 and will be crucial to establishing a role for Prometheus in the field of extracorporeal liver support.

Treatment of severe refractory pruritus with fractionated plasma separation and adsorption (Prometheus)

OBJECTIVE

Severe pruritus is a serious complication of cholestatic liver disease. Prometheus is a recently introduced extracorporeal liver support system with direct toxin adsorption of the patient's albumin fraction (FPSA; fractionated plasma separation and adsorption). Here we report on the effect of Prometheus therapy in patients with intractable cholestatic pruritus.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Seven patients with different liver diseases and severe pruritus refractory to all medical treatment efforts for more than 4 weeks were treated with Prometheus (3-5 times, 18+/-3 h total). Pruritus intensity was assessed using the visual analogue scale (VAS; from 0 = no pruritus to 10 = unbearable pruritus), and VAS, serum bile acids and total bilirubin were evaluated directly before and after Prometheus treatment, as well as 4 weeks later.

RESULTS

After Prometheus therapy, VAS values had dropped significantly from 9+/-1 to 3+/-3 (p<0.001). Likewise, serum bile acids decreased (from 248+/-192 to 101+/-85 micromol/l; p<0.03). All patients, with the exception of one with no initial bile acid elevation, reported a pronounced improvement in pruritus with Prometheus therapy, although in two anicteric patients the amelioration lasted only a few days. In the other four patients a distinct benefit was still observed 4 weeks after the treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

Prometheus therapy significantly improved refractory pruritus in all patients with elevated bile acid levels, but in some patients the clinical benefit was of short duration. The clinical findings suggest that we have to better characterize those patients who might derive a long-lasting benefit from this invasive and expensive treatment.

Pharmacokinetics of liposomal amphotericin B during extracorporeal albumin dialysis

Extracorporeal blood purification techniques such as hemofiltration or albumin dialysis can exert a significant, but not easily predictable influence on plasma pharmacokinetics of antimicrobial agents. The effect of albumin dialysis on the pharmacokinetics of liposomal amphotericin B (AMB) and other lipid-formulated drugs has not been investigated so far. Therefore, plasma concentrations of liberated and liposomal AMB were measured in a patient, who obtained liposomal AMB for suspected invasive mycosis and required albumin dialysis because of cholestatic liver failure caused by graft versus host disease after bone marrow transplantation. Liberated and liposomal AMB were separated by solid phase extraction and measured by high performance liquid chromatography. No excessive AMB elimination took place during albumin dialysis. Plasma levels of liposomal AMB exceeded those of liberated AMB. Pharmacokinetic data were comparable to those obtained previously in patients on hemofiltration and in critically ill patients without extracorporeal blood purification.

Review article: non-biological liver support in liver failure

Liver failure, whether acute or acute-on-chronic, remains an important cause of morbidity and mortality. The lack of liver detoxification, metabolic and regulatory functions of the liver leads to life-threatening complications, such as renal failure, altered immune response, hepatic coma and systemic haemodynamic dysfunction, eventually culminating in multiorgan failure. Current medical therapy involves the management of the precipitating event and treatment of complications until the liver eventually recovers, leaving us with no other treatment options than transplantation if these attempts fail. However, the shortage in cadaveric organs and other transplant-related problems, have prompted the need for alternative methods to provide liver support. As liver failure is often potentially reversible, considerable effort has been invested in the development of liver support systems. Currently, most of the experience is available for non-biological support systems. They represent the focus of this review, which aims to define the goals of liver support, to describe the design of the different existing devices and to analyse the available data to determine their current status in the management of patients with liver failure.

Cholestasis Induced by Parabolan Successfully Treated with the Molecular Adsorbent Recirculating System

We describe a case of a 21-year-old male bodybuilder who overdosed on Parabolan (trenbolone acetate) because of its anabolic activity. The patient, with no previous medical history, experienced pruritus and yellow discoloration of the skin and sclerae. Basic biochemical laboratory examination revealed signs of cholestasis with a serum bilirubin level of up to 65.5 mg/dl. Because supportive medical treatment was ineffective, the patient was treated with the molecular adsorbent recirculating system (MARS). Five MARS cycles lasting from 8 to 12 hours were performed every second day. The procedure was well tolerated by the patient and resulted in a sustained relief of pruritus. At the 2-month follow-up visit the plasma bilirubin level had decreased to 2 mg/dl.

Cholestasis and cholestatic syndromes

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This review highlights recent advances in understanding the regulation of bile acid transport in cholestasis and the pathogenesis and treatment of a variety of cholestatic conditions.

RECENT FINDINGS

Highlights include new understanding of the role of Mrp4 in bile acid homeostasis in cholestasis, new insights into the pathogenesis of specific cholestatic syndromes including primary biliary cirrhosis, primary sclerosing cholangitis, biliary atresia, and progressive familial intrahepatic cholestasis, and clinical trials of therapies for primary biliary cirrhosis, primary sclerosing cholangitis and intrahepatic cholestasis.

SUMMARY

Our understanding of the molecular mechanisms of cholestasis is advancing. These advances will hopefully lead to more effective therapies for specific cholestatic conditions.