Collaborating to educate nursing students on sepsis recognition and response

Evaluation of sepsis teaching for medical and dental students at a British University

INTRODUCTION

The aim of this study was to evaluate sepsis on undergraduate programmes in medicine (BMBS), dentistry (BDS) and dental therapy (BScDTH) at a university in England.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The study was carried out at the Faculty of Health, University of Plymouth. Questionnaires consisting of a series of closed and open-ended items were designed for students and faculty by a group of academics. Following a pilot, participants were invited to complete the questionnaires online. Data collection and analyses were completed over a period of 3 months.

RESULTS

A total of 71 students responded, including 43 were on the BDS programme, 21 on BMBS and 7 on BScDTH. The vast majority were aged between 18-24 years old (n = 61), with 9 reporting being between 25-44 years old. Of the 14 staff who responded, 13 were aged between 35 and 54 years old, with one respondent reporting being aged 25-34. The participants reported their perceptions regarding the teaching and clinical exposure of students to sepsis patients; availability of resources for students and patients to raise sepsis awareness. Students across all programmes reported limited clinical exposure to management of sepsis and lack of confidence in recognising early signs of sepsis in patients. The agreement profile between programmes only differed significantly for recognition of sepsis risk item (χ(6, n = 71) = 26.187, p < 0.001), with BDS students disagreeing with the item to a larger extent than BMBS and BScDTH students. Students and staff reported similar perceptions regarding information available to students and patients. Responses to open-ended items provided several suggestions for improvements in the teaching of students and raising public awareness on sepsis.

CONCLUSION

This study identified several areas related to sepsis teaching which require improvements across all programmes. The key issues highlighted by the students included limited clinical exposure to sepsis patients and lack of confidence in recognising early signs of sepsis.

Impact of sepsis education for healthcare professionals and students on learner and patient outcomes: A systematic review

BACKGROUND

Sepsis is an important global healthcare problem that is a key challenge faced by healthcare professionals face worldwide. One key effort aimed at reducing the global burden of sepsis is educating healthcare professionals about early identification and management of sepsis.

AIM

To provide a comprehensive evaluation of sepsis education among healthcare professionals and students.

METHODS

Six databases (PubMed, CINAHL, Embase, MEDLINE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Scopus) were searched. We included studies that described and evaluated any form of education or training on sepsis delivered to healthcare professionals and students. Study outcomes were summarised according to the adapted Kirkpatrick model of training evaluation.

RESULTS

Thirty-two studies were included in the review. The learning contents were reported to be in accordance with the Surviving Sepsis Campaign guidelines. Seven studies included the topic of interprofessional teamwork and communication in their sepsis education content. Most educational programs were effective and reported positive effects on immediate knowledge outcomes. Interventions that were delivered through an active learning approach such as simulation and game-based learning generally produced greater gains than didactic teaching. Improvements in patient care processes and patient outcomes were associated with the concomitant existence or implementation of a hospital sepsis care bundle.

CONCLUSION

Incorporating active learning strategies into sepsis education interventions has the potential to improve learners' long-term outcomes. In addition, sepsis education and protocol-based sepsis care bundle act in synergy to augment greater improvements in care processes and patient benefits.