1
|
Kim BR, Kim SI, Kim SW, Choi CH, Lee SW, Lim MC, Kim YH. Clinical outcome and pattern of care for isolated or incidental serous tubal intraepithelial carcinoma: a multicenter retrospective cohort study. J Gynecol Oncol 2025; 36:36.e68. [PMID: 40017163 DOI: 10.3802/jgo.2025.36.e68] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/20/2024] [Revised: 11/03/2024] [Accepted: 12/13/2024] [Indexed: 03/01/2025] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Serous tubal intraepithelial carcinoma (STIC), a potential precursor of high-grade serous carcinoma, is associated with subsequent carcinomas development. This study aimed to identify cases of STIC and serous tubal intraepithelial lesions (STIL) and examine clinical outcomes and patterns of care in BRCA1/2 mutations carriers undergoing risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy (RRSO), as well as patients with incidental STIC/STIL after benign gynecologic surgery. METHODS This retrospective study was conducted at six institutions to examine patients with isolated STIC/STIL. Demographic, adjuvant treatment, and follow-up data were collected from the date of implementation of Sectioning and Extensively Examining the Fimbriated end protocol, which varied from 2006 to 2015, until December 2022. RESULTS We analyzed the data of 1,119 women who underwent RRSO and were carriers of BRCA1/2 mutations. The detection rate of isolated STIC/STIL was 1.70%. No patient with STIC/STIL received adjuvant chemotherapy or staging operations. The institutions used different surveillance intervals and methods, with the most common being a 3-6 month interval (11 of 19 patients) and gynecological sonography (17 of 19 patients). All patients remained with no evidence of disease (NED) throughout the follow-up period (2-121 months). Additionally, we analyzed data from five women with incidental STIC/STIL diagnosed after benign gynecological surgery; one woman underwent staging surgery. During the follow-up period (3-46 months), all patients remained in NED. CONCLUSION While patient monitoring after STIC/STIL detection may be considered due to the minimal risk of carcinoma, excessive concern may not be necessary. Furthermore, adjuvant chemotherapy should be considered only with caution.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bo Ra Kim
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Ewha Womans University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Se Ik Kim
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Sang Wun Kim
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Women's Cancer Center, Yonsei Cancer Center, Institute of Women's Life Medical Science, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Chel Hun Choi
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Shin-Wha Lee
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Myong Cheol Lim
- Center for Gynecologic Cancer, Research Institute, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea
| | - Yun Hwan Kim
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Ewha Womans University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
van den Berg CB, Dasgupta S, Ewing-Graham PC, Bart J, Bulten J, Gaarenstroom KN, de Hullu JA, Mom CH, Mourits MJE, Steenbeek MP, van Marion R, van Beekhuizen HJ. Does serous tubal intraepithelial carcinoma (STIC) metastasize? The clonal relationship between STIC and subsequent high-grade serous carcinoma in BRCA1/2 mutation carriers several years after risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy. Gynecol Oncol 2024; 187:113-119. [PMID: 38759517 DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2024.05.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/05/2024] [Revised: 05/02/2024] [Accepted: 05/08/2024] [Indexed: 05/19/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The majority of high-grade serous carcinomas (HGSC) of the ovary, fallopian tube, and peritoneum arise from the precursor lesion called serous tubal intraepithelial carcinoma (STIC). It has been postulated that cells from STICs exfoliate into the peritoneal cavity and give rise to peritoneal HGSC several years later. While co-existent STICs and HGSCs have been reported to share similarities in their mutational profiles, clonal relationship between temporally distant STICs and HGSCs have been infrequently studied and the natural history of STICs remains poorly understood. METHODS We performed focused searches in two national databases from the Netherlands and identified a series of BRCA1/2 germline pathogenic variant (GPV) carriers (n = 7) who had STIC, and no detectable invasive carcinoma, at the time of their risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy (RRSO), and later developed peritoneal HGSC. The clonal relationship between these STICs and HGSCs was investigated by comparing their genetic mutational profile by performing next-generation targeted sequencing. RESULTS Identical pathogenic mutations and loss of heterozygosity of TP53 were identified in the STICs and HGSCs of five of the seven patients (71%), confirming the clonal relationship of the lesions. Median interval for developing HGSC after RRSO was 59 months (range: 24-118 months). CONCLUSION Our results indicate that cells from STIC can shed into the peritoneal cavity and give rise to HGSC after long lag periods in BRCA1/2 GPV carriers, and argues in favor of the hypothesis that STIC lesions may metastasize.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C B van den Berg
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Center, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
| | - S Dasgupta
- Department of Pathology, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands; Imaging Platform, Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, United States
| | - P C Ewing-Graham
- Department of Pathology, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - J Bart
- Department of Pathology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - J Bulten
- Department of Pathology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - K N Gaarenstroom
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - J A de Hullu
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - C H Mom
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Center for Gynecologic Oncology Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - M J E Mourits
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - M P Steenbeek
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - R van Marion
- Department of Pathology, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - H J van Beekhuizen
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Center, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Linz VC, Löwe A, van der Ven J, Hasenburg A, Battista MJ. Incidence of pelvic high-grade serous carcinoma after isolated STIC diagnosis: A systematic review of the literature. Front Oncol 2022; 12:951292. [PMID: 36119503 PMCID: PMC9472545 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.951292] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/23/2022] [Accepted: 08/09/2022] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective Serous tubal intraepithelial carcinoma (STIC) is a precursor lesion of pelvic high-grade serous carcinoma (HGSC). Information on treatment and outcome of isolated STIC is rare. Therefore, we reviewed systematically the published literature to determine the incidence of subsequent HGSC in the high- and low-risk population and to summarize the current diagnostic and therapeutic options. Methods A systematic review of the literature was conducted in MEDLINE-Ovid, Cochrane Library and Web of Science of articles published from February 2006 to July 2021. Patients with an isolated STIC diagnosis and clinical follow-up were included. Study exclusion criteria for review were the presence of synchronous gynaecological cancer and/or concurrent non-gynaecological malignancies. Results 3031 abstracts were screened. 112 isolated STIC patients out of 21 publications were included in our analysis with a pooled median follow-up of 36 (interquartile range (IQR): 25.3-84) months. 71.4% of the patients had peritoneal washings (negative: 62.5%, positive: 8%, atypic cells: 0.9%). Surgical staging was performed in 28.6% of all STICs and did not show any malignancies. 14 out of 112 (12.5%) patients received adjuvant chemotherapy with Carboplatin and Paclitaxel. Eight (7.1%) patients developed a recurrence 42.5 (IQR: 33-72) months after isolated STIC diagnosis. Cumulative incidence of HGSC after five (ten) years was 10.5% (21.6%). Recurrence occurred only in BRCA1 carriers (seven out of eight patients, one patient with unknown BRCA status). Conclusion The rate of HGSC after an isolated STIC diagnosis was 7.1% with a cumulative incidence of 10.5% (21.6%) after five (ten) years. HGSC was only observed in BRCA1 carriers. The role of adjuvant therapy and routine surveillance remains unclear, however, intense surveillance up to ten years is necessary. Systematic Review Registration https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/, identifier CRD42021278340.
Collapse
|
4
|
Steenbeek MP, van Bommel MH, Bulten J, Hulsmann JA, Bogaerts J, Garcia C, Cun HT, Lu KH, van Beekhuizen HJ, Minig L, Gaarenstroom KN, Nobbenhuis M, Krajc M, Rudaitis V, Norquist BM, Swisher EM, Mourits MJ, Massuger LF, Hoogerbrugge N, Hermens RP, IntHout J, de Hullu JA. Risk of Peritoneal Carcinomatosis After Risk-Reducing Salpingo-Oophorectomy: A Systematic Review and Individual Patient Data Meta-Analysis. J Clin Oncol 2022; 40:1879-1891. [PMID: 35302882 PMCID: PMC9851686 DOI: 10.1200/jco.21.02016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 52] [Impact Index Per Article: 17.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/22/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE After risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy (RRSO), BRCA1/2 pathogenic variant (PV) carriers have a residual risk to develop peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC). The etiology of PC is not yet clarified, but may be related to serous tubal intraepithelial carcinoma (STIC), the postulated origin for high-grade serous cancer. In this systematic review and individual patient data meta-analysis, we investigate the risk of PC in women with and without STIC at RRSO. METHODS Unpublished data from three centers were supplemented by studies identified in a systematic review of EMBASE, MEDLINE, and the Cochrane library describing women with a BRCA-PV with and without STIC at RRSO until September 2020. Primary outcome was the hazard ratio for the risk of PC between BRCA-PV carriers with and without STIC at RRSO, and the corresponding 5- and 10-year risks. Primary analysis was based on a one-stage Cox proportional-hazards regression with a frailty term for study. RESULTS From 17 studies, individual patient data were available for 3,121 women, of whom 115 had a STIC at RRSO. The estimated hazard ratio to develop PC during follow-up in women with STIC was 33.9 (95% CI, 15.6 to 73.9), P < .001) compared with women without STIC. For women with STIC, the five- and ten-year risks to develop PC were 10.5% (95% CI, 6.2 to 17.2) and 27.5% (95% CI, 15.6 to 43.9), respectively, whereas the corresponding risks were 0.3% (95% CI, 0.2 to 0.6) and 0.9% (95% CI, 0.6 to 1.4) for women without STIC at RRSO. CONCLUSION BRCA-PV carriers with STIC at RRSO have a strongly increased risk to develop PC which increases over time, although current data are limited by small numbers of events.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Miranda P. Steenbeek
- Radboud University Medical Center, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Nijmegen, the Netherlands,Miranda P. Steenbeek, MD, Radboud University Medical Center, PO Box 9101, 6500 HB, Nijmegen, the Netherlands; e-mail:
| | - Majke H.D. van Bommel
- Radboud University Medical Center, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Johan Bulten
- Radboud University Medical Center, Department of Pathology, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Julia A. Hulsmann
- Radboud University Medical Center, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Joep Bogaerts
- Radboud University Medical Center, Department of Pathology, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Christine Garcia
- Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Division of Gynecologic Oncology San Francisco, San Francisco CA
| | - Han T. Cun
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Karen H. Lu
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Heleen J. van Beekhuizen
- Erasmus MC Cancer Center, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Department of Gynecological Oncology, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Lucas Minig
- Gynecologic Oncology Unit, IMED Hospitales, Valencia, Spain
| | - Katja N. Gaarenstroom
- Leiden University Medical Center, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Marielle Nobbenhuis
- The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, Department of Gynaecology, London, England
| | - Mateja Krajc
- Institute of Oncology Ljubljana, Department of Clinical Genetics, Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | - Vilius Rudaitis
- Vilnius University Faculty of Medicine, Clinic of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Vilnius, Lithuania
| | | | | | - Marian J.E. Mourits
- University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Leon F.A.G. Massuger
- Radboud University Medical Center, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Nicoline Hoogerbrugge
- Radboud University Medical Center, Department of Human Genetics, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Rosella P.M.G. Hermens
- Radboud University Medical Center, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Scientific Institute for Quality of Healthcare, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Joanna IntHout
- Radboud University Medical Center, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Department for Health Evidence, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Joanne A. de Hullu
- Radboud University Medical Center, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Bogaerts JMA, Steenbeek MP, van Bommel MHD, Bulten J, van der Laak JAWM, de Hullu JA, Simons M. Recommendations for diagnosing STIC: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Virchows Arch 2022; 480:725-737. [PMID: 34850262 PMCID: PMC9023413 DOI: 10.1007/s00428-021-03244-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/16/2021] [Revised: 10/27/2021] [Accepted: 11/22/2021] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
Our understanding of the oncogenesis of high-grade serous cancer of the ovary and its precursor lesions, such as serous tubal intraepithelial carcinoma (STIC), has significantly increased over the last decades. Adequate and reproducible diagnosis of these precursor lesions is important. Diagnosing STIC can have prognostic consequences and is an absolute requirement for safely offering alternative risk reducing strategies, such as risk reducing salpingectomy with delayed oophorectomy. However, diagnosing STIC is a challenging task, possessing only moderate reproducibility. In this review and meta-analysis, we look at how pathologists come to a diagnosis of STIC. We performed a literature search identifying 39 studies on risk reducing salpingo-oophorectomy in women with a known BRCA1/2 PV, collectively reporting on 6833 patients. We found a pooled estimated proportion of STIC of 2.8% (95% CI, 2.0-3.7). We focused on reported grossing protocols, morphological criteria, level of pathologist training, and the use of immunohistochemistry. The most commonly mentioned morphological characteristics of STIC are (1) loss of cell polarity, (2) nuclear pleomorphism, (3) high nuclear to cytoplasmic ratio, (4) mitotic activity, (5) pseudostratification, and (6) prominent nucleoli. The difference in reported incidence of STIC between studies who totally embedded all specimens and those who did not was 3.2% (95% CI, 2.3-4.2) versus 1.7% (95% CI, 0.0-6.2) (p 0.24). We provide an overview of diagnostic features and present a framework for arriving at an adequate diagnosis, consisting of the use of the SEE-FIM grossing protocol, evaluation by a subspecialized gynecopathologist, rational use of immunohistochemical staining, and obtaining a second opinion from a colleague.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joep M A Bogaerts
- Department of Pathology, Radboud University Medical Center, Postbus 9101, 6500 HB, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
| | - Miranda P Steenbeek
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Majke H D van Bommel
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Johan Bulten
- Department of Pathology, Radboud University Medical Center, Postbus 9101, 6500 HB, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | | | - Joanne A de Hullu
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Michiel Simons
- Department of Pathology, Radboud University Medical Center, Postbus 9101, 6500 HB, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Feeney L, Harley IJG, McCluggage WG, Mullan PB, Beirne JP. Liquid biopsy in ovarian cancer: Catching the silent killer before it strikes. World J Clin Oncol 2020; 11:868-889. [PMID: 33312883 PMCID: PMC7701910 DOI: 10.5306/wjco.v11.i11.868] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/29/2020] [Revised: 07/29/2020] [Accepted: 11/04/2020] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) is the most lethal gynaecological malignancy in the western world. The majority of women presenting with the disease are asymptomatic and it has been dubbed the "silent killer". To date there is no effective minimally invasive method of stratifying those with the disease or screening for the disease in the general population. Recent molecular and pathological discoveries, along with the advancement of scientific technology, means there is a real possibility of having disease-specific liquid biopsies available within the clinical environment in the near future. In this review we discuss these discoveries, particularly in relation to the most common and aggressive form of EOC, and their role in making this possibility a reality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laura Feeney
- Patrick G Johnston Centre for Cancer Research, Queens University, Belfast BT9 7AE, United Kingdom
| | - Ian JG Harley
- Northern Ireland Gynaecological Cancer Centre, Belfast Health and Social Care Trust, Belfast BT9 7AB, United Kingdom
| | - W Glenn McCluggage
- Department of Pathology, Belfast Health and Social Care Trust, Belfast BT12 6BL, United Kingdom
| | - Paul B Mullan
- Patrick G Johnston Centre for Cancer Research, Queens University, Belfast BT9 7AE, United Kingdom
| | - James P Beirne
- Trinity St James Cancer Institute, St. James’ Hospital, Dublin 8, Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To perform a systematic review of the literature to estimate the prevalence and outcomes of occult tubal carcinoma in BRCA mutation carriers and high-risk patients undergoing risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy. DATA SOURCE A search was done using OVID MEDLINE, EMBASE, and ClinicalTrials.gov between 1946 and March 2019 with keywords and MeSH terms selected by an expert medical librarian and coauthors. METHODS OF STUDY SELECTION Two independent reviewers performed study selection with an initial screen on abstracts and a second on full articles. Articles were rejected if they were irrelevant to the study question, pertained to a different population or did not report occult tubal neoplasia. Quality was assessed using methodologic index for nonrandomized studies criteria. TABULATION, INTEGRATION, AND RESULTS Data were extracted and recorded in an Excel database. Forest plots for the prevalence of occult carcinoma were done using STATA. Among 2,402 studies assessed, 27 met the inclusion criteria for qualitative and quantitative analysis. A total of 6,283 patients underwent risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy between 2002 and 2019: 2,894 cases were BRCA1, 1,579 BRCA2, and 1,810 high-risk based on family history. Among these, 75 patients were diagnosed with occult tubal carcinoma at the time of surgery. The pooled prevalence was 1.2% (I=7.1%, P=.363) occurring at a median age of 53.2 years (range 42.4-67). In a subanalysis of 18 studies reporting follow-up data, 10 recurrences (18.7%, 95% CI 7.5-53%) and 24 cases of post-risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy peritoneal cancer (0.54%, 95% CI 0.4-1.9%) were reported after a median follow-up of 52.5 months. BRCA1, older age, and previous breast cancer were more often associated with occult malignancy. CONCLUSION Occult tubal carcinomas found at risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy in high-risk patients and BRCA mutation carriers have significant potential for recurrence despite the frequent administration of postoperative chemotherapy.
Collapse
|
8
|
Lõhmussaar K, Kopper O, Korving J, Begthel H, Vreuls CPH, van Es JH, Clevers H. Assessing the origin of high-grade serous ovarian cancer using CRISPR-modification of mouse organoids. Nat Commun 2020; 11:2660. [PMID: 32461556 PMCID: PMC7253462 DOI: 10.1038/s41467-020-16432-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 75] [Impact Index Per Article: 15.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/23/2019] [Accepted: 05/04/2020] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
High-grade serous ovarian cancer (HG-SOC)—often referred to as a “silent killer”—is the most lethal gynecological malignancy. The fallopian tube (murine oviduct) and ovarian surface epithelium (OSE) are considered the main candidate tissues of origin of this cancer. However, the relative contribution of each tissue to HG-SOC is not yet clear. Here, we establish organoid-based tumor progression models of HG-SOC from murine oviductal and OSE tissues. We use CRISPR-Cas9 genome editing to introduce mutations into genes commonly found mutated in HG-SOC, such as Trp53, Brca1, Nf1 and Pten. Our results support the dual origin hypothesis of HG-SOC, as we demonstrate that both epithelia can give rise to ovarian tumors with high-grade pathology. However, the mutated oviductal organoids expand much faster in vitro and more readily form malignant tumors upon transplantation. Furthermore, in vitro drug testing reveals distinct lineage-dependent sensitivities to the common drugs used to treat HG-SOC in patients. The relative contribution of fallopian tube (FT) or ovarian surface epithelium (OSE) to high-grade serous ovarian cancer (HG-SOC) development is unclear. Here, the authors establish organoid models from murine oviductal and OSE tissues that allow cancer modeling via CRISPR-Cas9 genome editing, and report a dual origin of murine HG-SOC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kadi Lõhmussaar
- Hubrecht Institute, Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences and UMC Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.,Oncode Institute, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Oded Kopper
- Hubrecht Institute, Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences and UMC Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.,Oncode Institute, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Jeroen Korving
- Hubrecht Institute, Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences and UMC Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.,Oncode Institute, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Harry Begthel
- Hubrecht Institute, Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences and UMC Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.,Oncode Institute, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | | | - Johan H van Es
- Hubrecht Institute, Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences and UMC Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.,Oncode Institute, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Hans Clevers
- Hubrecht Institute, Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences and UMC Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands. .,Oncode Institute, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Casey L, Singh N. Ovarian High-Grade Serous Carcinoma: Assessing Pathology for Site of Origin, Staging and Post-neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Changes. Surg Pathol Clin 2019; 12:515-528. [PMID: 31097113 DOI: 10.1016/j.path.2019.01.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/26/2022]
Abstract
High-grade serous (HGSC) stands apart from the other ovarian cancer histotypes in being the most frequent, in occurring as part of a genetic predisposition in a significant proportion of cases, and in having the poorest clinical outcomes. Although the pathologic diagnosis of HGSC is now made with high accuracy, there remain areas of disagreement regarding viewpoints on tissue site of origin and designation of primary site, with impact on staging in low-stage cases, as well as difficulties in reproducible and clinically relevant reporting of HGSC in specimens taken after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. These areas are discussed in the current article.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laura Casey
- Department of Pathology, Queen's Hospital, Rom Valley Way, Romford RM7 0AG, UK
| | - Naveena Singh
- Department of Cellular Pathology, Barts Health NHS Trust, The Royal London Hospital, 2nd Floor, 80 Newark Street, London E1 2ES, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Kyo S, Ishikawa N, Nakamura K, Nakayama K. The fallopian tube as origin of ovarian cancer: Change of diagnostic and preventive strategies. Cancer Med 2019; 9:421-431. [PMID: 31769234 PMCID: PMC6970023 DOI: 10.1002/cam4.2725] [Citation(s) in RCA: 38] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/09/2019] [Revised: 11/06/2019] [Accepted: 11/08/2019] [Indexed: 01/20/2023] Open
Abstract
Ovarian cancer is the leading cause of gynecologic cancer death in the world, and its prevention and early diagnosis remain the key to its treatment, especially for high‐grade serous carcinoma (HGSC). Accumulating epidemiological and molecular evidence has shown that HGSC originates from fallopian tube secretory cells through serous tubal intraepithelial carcinoma. Comprehensive molecular analyses and mouse studies have uncovered the key driver events for serous carcinogenesis, providing novel molecular targets. Risk‐reducing bilateral salpingo‐oophorectomy (RRSO) has been proposed to reduce the subsequent occurrence of serous carcinoma in high‐risk patients with BRCA mutations. However, there is no management strategy for isolated precursors detected at RRSO, and the role of subsequent surgery or chemotherapy in preventing serous carcinoma remains unclear. Surgical menopause due to RRSO provides a variety of problems related to patients’ quality of life, and the risks and benefits of hormone replacement are under investigation, especially for women without a previous history of breast cancer. An additional surgical option, salpingectomy with delayed oophorectomy, has been proposed to prevent surgical menopause. The number of opportunistic salpingectomies at the time of surgery for benign disease to prevent the future occurrence of HGSC has increased worldwide. Thus, the changing concept of the origin of serous carcinoma has provided us a great opportunity to develop novel diagnostic and therapeutic approaches.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Satoru Kyo
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Shimane University Faculty of Medicine, Izumo, Shimane, Japan
| | - Noriyoshi Ishikawa
- Department of Pathology, Shimane University Faculty of Medicine, Izumo, Shimane, Japan
| | - Kohei Nakamura
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Shimane University Faculty of Medicine, Izumo, Shimane, Japan
| | - Kentaro Nakayama
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Shimane University Faculty of Medicine, Izumo, Shimane, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Cheng A, Li L, Wu M, Lang J. Pathological findings following risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy in BRCA mutation carriers: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Surg Oncol 2019; 46:139-147. [PMID: 31521389 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2019.09.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/10/2019] [Revised: 08/23/2019] [Accepted: 09/04/2019] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To evaluate the benefit of risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy (RRSO) by estimating the pathological positive rate of occult lesions, including serous tubal intraepithelial carcinoma (STIC) and occult cancers (OCCs). METHODS BRCA1/2 mutation carriers who underwent RRSO in a Chinese study center between 2014 and 2018 were included. A literature review was performed, followed by a meta-analysis of the literature to further validate the findings. RESULTS Twenty-four BRCA1/2 mutation carriers who underwent RRSO were identified; one patient (4.2%) had STIC, and one patient (4.2%) had occult fallopian tube cancer complicated by STIC. Thirty-four articles were ultimately included in the meta-analysis. Of the reported cases of OCC, 61.3% occurred in the fallopian tubes and 32.3% in the ovaries, and 81.5% were in the early stages. The estimated rate of overall pathological positive events was 5%. The estimated rates of overall STIC events and OCC were 1% and 3%, respectively. The rates of STIC and OCC were 1% and 3%, respectively, for BRCA1 mutation carriers and 1% and 1%, respectively, for BRCA2 mutation carriers. No significant difference was observed between the results of a routine examination of pathological sections and those of the Sectioning and Extensively Examining the Fimbriae (SEE-FIM) protocol. CONCLUSIONS This study is the first report of RRSO results in China. In this systematic review, the positive rates of STIC or OCC after RRSO were no more than 3%, which are 200-fold higher than the risk of the general population. The use of a strict SEE-FIM protocol would likely increase positive results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aoshuang Cheng
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Peking Union Medical College & Chinese Academy of Medical Science, Beijing, 100730, China.
| | - Lei Li
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Peking Union Medical College & Chinese Academy of Medical Science, Beijing, 100730, China.
| | - Ming Wu
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Peking Union Medical College & Chinese Academy of Medical Science, Beijing, 100730, China.
| | - Jinghe Lang
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Peking Union Medical College & Chinese Academy of Medical Science, Beijing, 100730, China.
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Abstract
Hereditary breast and ovarian carcinomas are frequently caused by germline mutations of the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes (BRCA1/2 syndromes) and are often less associated with other hereditary syndromes such as Li-Fraumeni and Peutz-Jeghers. The BRCA1/2 proteins have a special role in DNA repair. Therefore, loss of function due to mutation causes an accumulation of mutations in other genes and subsequent tumorigenesis at an early age. BRCA1/2 mutations are irregularly distributed over the length of the genes without hot spots, although special mutations are known. Breast and ovarian cancer occur far more frequently in women with BRCA1/2 germline mutations compared with the general population. Breast cancer occurs increasingly from the age of 30, ovarian cancer in BRCA1 syndrome from the age of 40 and BRCA2 from the age of 50. Suspicion of a BRCA syndrome should be prompted in the case of clustering of breast cancer in 1st degree relatives, in particular at a young age, if breast and ovarian cancer have occurred, and if cases of male breast cancer are known. Breast carcinomas with medullary differentiation seem to predominate in BRCA syndromes, but other carcinoma types may also occur. BRCA germline mutations seem to occur frequently in triple-negative breast carcinomas, whereas an association with ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) is rare. Ovarian carcinomas in BRCA syndromes are usually high-grade serous, mucinous carcinomas and borderline tumors are unusual. Pathology plays a special role within the multidisciplinary team in the recognition of patients with hereditary cancer syndromes.
Collapse
|
13
|
Laban M, Ibrahim EA, Hassanin AS, Nasreldin MA, Mansour A, Khalaf WM, Bahaa Eldin AM, Hussain SH, Elsafty MS, Hasanien AS. Chlamydia trachomatis infection in primary fallopian tube and high-grade serous ovarian cancers: a pilot study. Int J Womens Health 2019; 11:199-205. [PMID: 30962726 PMCID: PMC6434919 DOI: 10.2147/ijwh.s188938] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/04/2023] Open
Abstract
Background The aim of this study was to evaluate the association of Chlamydia trachomatis (CT) infection with primary tubal and high-grade serous ovarian cancers. Methods This is a cross-sectional, retrospective study conducted at Ain Shams University Maternity Hospital, Egypt, from February 2008 to October 2017. Sixty-seven paraffin archival blocks specimens were retrieved from cases who underwent staging laparotomy due to high-grade serous ovarian cancer (30 cases), primary tubal serous cancer (25 cases), and control specimens of (12) tubal specimens from cases of benign gynecological conditions. All samples were examined for CT DNA using semiquantitative qRT-PCR. Results CT DNA was detected in 84% of high-grade tubal serous cancer, 16.7% of high-grade serous ovarian cancer, and 13.3% in controls (P<0.0005). Mean CT DNA relative quantity was significantly high (256) in tubal carcinoma, in comparison to that in high-grade serous ovarian cancer and controls (13.5 and 0.28, respectively; P<0.0005). Conclusion To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report on relation of CT to the tubal serous cancer, so the responsibility of CT tubal infection in the pathogenesis of primary tubal cancer needs to be considered.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mohamed Laban
- Gynecologic Oncology Unit, Obstetrics and Gynecology Department, Faculty of Medicine, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt
| | - Eman A Ibrahim
- Pathology Department, Faculty of Medicine, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt
| | - Alaa S Hassanin
- Obstetrics and Gynecology Department, Faculty of Medicine, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt,
| | - Magda A Nasreldin
- Pathology Department, Early Cancer Detection Unit of Ain Shams Maternity Hospital, Faculty of Medicine, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt
| | - Amal Mansour
- Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Department, Faculty of Medicine, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt
| | - Waleed M Khalaf
- Obstetrics and Gynecology Department, Faculty of Medicine, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt,
| | - Ahmed M Bahaa Eldin
- Obstetrics and Gynecology Department, Faculty of Medicine, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt,
| | - Sherif H Hussain
- Obstetrics and Gynecology Department, Faculty of Medicine, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt,
| | - Mohammed S Elsafty
- Gynecologic Oncology Unit, Obstetrics and Gynecology Department, Faculty of Medicine, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt
| | - Ahmad S Hasanien
- Family Medicine Department, Royal Australian College of General Practitioners, Sydney, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Kim J, Park EY, Kim O, Schilder JM, Coffey DM, Cho CH, Bast RC. Cell Origins of High-Grade Serous Ovarian Cancer. Cancers (Basel) 2018; 10:cancers10110433. [PMID: 30424539 PMCID: PMC6267333 DOI: 10.3390/cancers10110433] [Citation(s) in RCA: 171] [Impact Index Per Article: 24.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/22/2018] [Revised: 11/03/2018] [Accepted: 11/07/2018] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
High-grade serous ovarian cancer, also known as high-grade serous carcinoma (HGSC), is the most common and deadliest type of ovarian cancer. HGSC appears to arise from the ovary, fallopian tube, or peritoneum. As most HGSC cases present with widespread peritoneal metastases, it is often not clear where HGSC truly originates. Traditionally, the ovarian surface epithelium (OSE) was long believed to be the origin of HGSC. Since the late 1990s, the fallopian tube epithelium has emerged as a potential primary origin of HGSC. Particularly, serous tubal intraepithelial carcinoma (STIC), a noninvasive tumor lesion formed preferentially in the distal fallopian tube epithelium, was proposed as a precursor for HGSC. It was hypothesized that STIC lesions would progress, over time, to malignant and metastatic HGSC, arising from the fallopian tube or after implanting on the ovary or peritoneum. Many clinical studies and several mouse models support the fallopian tube STIC origin of HGSC. Current evidence indicates that STIC may serve as a precursor for HGSC in high-risk women carrying germline BRCA1 or 2 mutations. Yet not all STIC lesions appear to progress to clinical HGSCs, nor would all HGSCs arise from STIC lesions, even in high-risk women. Moreover, the clinical importance of STIC remains less clear in women in the general population, in which 85–90% of all HGSCs arise. Recently, increasing attention has been brought to the possibility that many potential precursor or premalignant lesions, though composed of microscopically—and genetically—cancerous cells, do not advance to malignant tumors or lethal malignancies. Hence, rigorous causal evidence would be crucial to establish that STIC is a bona fide premalignant lesion for metastatic HGSC. While not all STICs may transform into malignant tumors, these lesions are clearly associated with increased risk for HGSC. Identification of the molecular characteristics of STICs that predict their malignant potential and clinical behavior would bolster the clinical importance of STIC. Also, as STIC lesions alone cannot account for all HGSCs, other potential cellular origins of HGSC need to be investigated. The fallopian tube stroma in mice, for instance, has been shown to be capable of giving rise to metastatic HGSC, which faithfully recapitulates the clinical behavior and molecular aspect of human HGSC. Elucidating the precise cell(s) of origin of HGSC will be critical for improving the early detection and prevention of ovarian cancer, ultimately reducing ovarian cancer mortality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jaeyeon Kim
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN 46202, USA.
- Indiana University Melvin & Bren Simon Cancer Center, Indianapolis, IN 46202, USA.
| | - Eun Young Park
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN 46202, USA.
| | - Olga Kim
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN 46202, USA.
| | - Jeanne M Schilder
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN 46202, USA.
- Indiana University Melvin & Bren Simon Cancer Center, Indianapolis, IN 46202, USA.
| | - Donna M Coffey
- Department of Pathology and Genomic Medicine, Houston Methodist and Weill Cornell Medical College, Houston, TX 77030, USA.
| | - Chi-Heum Cho
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Medicine, Keimyung University, Daegu 41931, Korea.
| | - Robert C Bast
- Department of Experimental Therapeutics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Abstract
Serous tubal intraepithelial carcinoma is considered the precursor lesion of high-grade serous carcinoma, and found in both low-risk and high-risk populations. Isolated serous tubal intraepithelial carcinomas in patients with BRCA1/2 mutations are detected in ∼2% of patients undergoing risk-reducing bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy and even with removal of the tubes and ovaries the rate of developing primary peritoneal carcinoma following remains up to 7.5%. Postoperative recommendations after finding incidental STICs remain unclear and surgical staging, adjuvant chemotherapy, or observation have been proposed. Discovery of STIC should prompt consideration of hereditary cancer program referral for BRCA1/2 mutation screening.
Collapse
|
16
|
Van der Hoeven NMA, Van Wijk K, Bonfrer SE, Beltman JJ, Louwe LA, De Kroon CD, Van Asperen CJ, Gaarenstroom KN. Outcome and Prognostic Impact of Surgical Staging in Serous Tubal Intraepithelial Carcinoma: A Cohort Study and Systematic Review. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 2018; 30:463-471. [PMID: 29691126 DOI: 10.1016/j.clon.2018.03.036] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/28/2018] [Accepted: 03/21/2018] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
The optimal management of breast cancer susceptibility gene (BRCA)1/2 carriers with isolated serous tubal intraepithelial carcinoma (STIC) found at risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy (RRSO) is unclear. The prevalence of occult carcinoma and STIC in a consecutive series of BRCA1/2 carriers undergoing RRSO is reported. The outcome of staging procedures in BRCA1/2 carriers with isolated STIC at RRSO as well as the relationship between staging, chemotherapy treatment and risk of recurrence was assessed via a systematic review of the literature. Our series included 235 BRCA1/2 carriers who underwent RRSO. Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics stage IA carcinoma or STIC was found at RRSO in three (1.3%) and two (0.9%) patients, respectively. A systematic review of the literature included 82 BRCA1/2 carriers with isolated STIC found at RRSO. In 13/82 (16%) cases with STIC, staging was reported. In none of these cases staging revealed more advanced disease. Recurrent disease was found in four of 36 patients with reported follow-up. The estimated risk of recurrence in patients with isolated STIC at RRSO was about 11% (95% confidence interval 3-26%) after a median follow-up of 42 months (range 7-138). No recurrences were reported in those patients with STIC at RRSO who underwent staging or received chemotherapy. We found 1.3% occult carcinoma and 0.9% STIC at RRSO in our cohort of BRCA1/2 carriers. A systematic review of the literature suggests that additional treatment after RRSO, i.e. staging and/or chemotherapy, is associated with a lower risk of recurrence. However, data on staging and follow-up are limited.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- N M A Van der Hoeven
- Department of Gynecology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - K Van Wijk
- Department of Gynecology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - S E Bonfrer
- Department of Gynecology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - J J Beltman
- Department of Gynecology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - L A Louwe
- Department of Gynecology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - C D De Kroon
- Department of Gynecology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - C J Van Asperen
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - K N Gaarenstroom
- Department of Gynecology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Wong S, Ratner E, Buza N. Intra-operative evaluation of prophylactic hysterectomy and salpingo-oophorectomy specimens in hereditary gynaecological cancer syndromes. Histopathology 2018; 73:109-123. [DOI: 10.1111/his.13503] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/09/2018] [Accepted: 02/21/2018] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Serena Wong
- Department of Pathology; Yale University School of Medicine; New Haven CT USA
| | - Elena Ratner
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology; Division of Gynecologic Oncology; Yale University School of Medicine; New Haven CT USA
| | - Natalia Buza
- Department of Pathology; Yale University School of Medicine; New Haven CT USA
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW The most common type of ovarian cancer, high-grade serous ovarian carcinoma (HGSOC), was originally thought to develop from the ovarian surface epithelium. However, recent data suggest that the cells that undergo neoplastic transformation and give rise to the majority of HGSOC are from the fallopian tube. This development has impacted both translational research and clinical practice, revealing new opportunities for early detection, prevention, and treatment of ovarian cancer. RECENT FINDINGS Genomic studies indicate that approximately 50% of HGSOC are characterized by mutations in genes involved in the homologous recombination pathway of DNA repair, especially BRCA1 and BRCA2. Clinical trials have demonstrated successful treatment of homologous recombination-defective cancers with poly-ribose polymerase inhibitors through synthetic lethality. Recently, amplification of CCNE1 was found to be another major factor in HGSOC tumorigenesis, accounting for approximately 20% of all cases. Interestingly, amplification of CCNE1 and mutation of homologous recombination repair genes are mutually exclusive in HGSOC. SUMMARY The fallopian tube secretory cell is the cell of origin for the majority of ovarian cancers. Although it remains unclear what triggers neoplastic transformation of these cells, certain tumors exhibit loss of BRCA function or amplification of CCNE1. These alterations represent unique therapeutic opportunities in ovarian cancer.
Collapse
|
19
|
Malacarne DR, Boyd LR, Long Y, Blank SV. "Best practices in risk reducing bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy: the influence of surgical specialty". World J Surg Oncol 2017; 15:218. [PMID: 29228967 PMCID: PMC5725804 DOI: 10.1186/s12957-017-1282-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/07/2016] [Accepted: 11/23/2017] [Indexed: 11/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Risk-reducing bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy (RRBSO) increases survival in patients at high risk of developing ovarian cancer. While many general gynecologists perform this procedure, some argue it should be performed exclusively by specialists. In this retrospective observational study, we identified how often optimal techniques were used and whether surgeons’ training impacted implementation. Methods We used the ACOG guidelines highlighting various aspects of the procedure to determine which elements were consistent with best practices to maximize surgical prophylaxis. All cases of RRBSO from 2006 to 2010 were identified. We abstracted data from the operative and pathology reports to review the techniques employed. Fisher’s exact test and chi-square were utilized to compare differences between groups (InStat, La Jolla, CA). Results Among 263 RRBSOs, 22 were performed by general gynecologists and 241 by gynecologic oncologists. Gynecologic oncologists were more likely to perform pelvic washings—217/241 vs. 10/22 (p < .0001). They were more likely to include a description of the upper abdomen—220/241 vs. 12/22 (p < .0001). Oncologists were more likely to utilize a retroperitoneal approach to skeletonize the infundibulopelvic ligaments—157/241 vs. 3/22 (p < .0001). When operations were performed by oncologists, the specimens were more often completely sectioned—217/241 vs. 16/22 (p = .003). The use of a retroperitoneal approach among gynecologic oncologists increased over the study period (chi-square for trend, p < .0001). There was no visible trend in performance improvement in any other area when looking at either group. Conclusion Gynecologic oncologists are more likely to adhere to best practice techniques when performing RRBSO, though there was room for improvement for both groups.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dominique R Malacarne
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, New York University School of Medicine, 462 1st Avenue, Rm 9 E2, New York, NY, 10016, USA.
| | - Leslie R Boyd
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, New York University School of Medicine, 462 1st Avenue, Rm 9 E2, New York, NY, 10016, USA
| | - Yang Long
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, New York University School of Medicine, 462 1st Avenue, Rm 9 E2, New York, NY, 10016, USA
| | - Stephanie V Blank
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, New York University School of Medicine, 462 1st Avenue, Rm 9 E2, New York, NY, 10016, USA
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Adopting a Uniform Approach to Site Assignment in Tubo-Ovarian High-Grade Serous Carcinoma: The Time has Come. Int J Gynecol Pathol 2017; 35:230-7. [PMID: 26977579 DOI: 10.1097/pgp.0000000000000270] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/02/2023]
Abstract
There is currently sufficient evidence that nonuterine high-grade serous carcinoma (HGSC) originates in the fallopian tube in the majority of cases, but this is not uniformly reflected in our diagnostic terminology. This is because there remains wide variation in awareness and acceptance of this evidence, which conflicts with traditional views on origin. Accurate disease classification is fundamental to routine clinical practice and research, particularly at a time when exciting new approaches to therapy, early detection, and prevention are appearing on the horizon. We feel the time has come to minimize individual and institutional variations in practice, and agree on an evidence-based approach to uniform terminology and primary site assignment. In this paper we put forward a proposal for a unified approach based on published research evidence and discuss the reasons why it is vital to agree on a uniform protocol. We propose the term "Tubo-ovarian HGSC" in preference to "pelvic" or "Müllerian," as it accurately reflects the origin of this disease in the vast majority of cases, and is unambiguous, distinguishing it clearly from uterine serous carcinoma and ovarian low-grade serous carcinomas. A detailed protocol for primary site assignment is presented for different scenarios, which is easy to follow and has been developed with a view to promoting a uniform approach worldwide.
Collapse
|
21
|
Miller H, Anderson ML. Author's Reply. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2017. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jmig.2017.06.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
|
22
|
Assessing the Risk of Occult Cancer and 30-day Morbidity in Women Undergoing Risk-reducing Surgery: A Prospective Experience. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2017; 24:837-842. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jmig.2017.04.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/01/2017] [Revised: 04/21/2017] [Accepted: 04/24/2017] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
|
23
|
Regarding "The Role of Routine Peritoneal and Omental Biopsies at Risk-reducing Salpingo-oophorectomy". J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2017. [PMID: 28648838 DOI: 10.1016/j.jmig.2017.05.020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
|
24
|
Meserve EEK, Brouwer J, Crum CP. Serous tubal intraepithelial neoplasia: the concept and its application. Mod Pathol 2017; 30:710-721. [PMID: 28106106 DOI: 10.1038/modpathol.2016.238] [Citation(s) in RCA: 57] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/14/2016] [Revised: 12/04/2016] [Accepted: 12/05/2016] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
In recent years it has become clear that many extra-uterine (pelvic) high-grade serous carcinomas (serous carcinomas) are preceded by a precursor lesion in the distal fallopian tube. Precursors range from small self-limited 'p53 signatures' to expansile serous tubal intraepithelial neoplasms that include both serous tubal epithelial proliferations (or lesions) of uncertain significance and serous tubal intraepithelial carcinomas. These precursors can be considered from three perspectives. The first is biologic underpinnings, which are multifactorial, and include the intersection of DNA damage with Tp53 mutations and disturbances in transcriptional regulation that increase with age. The second perspective is the morphologic discovery and classification of intraepithelial neoplasms that are intercepted early in their natural history, either incidentally or in risk-reduction surgeries for germline mutations. For the practicing pathologist, as well as the investigators, a distinction between a primary intraepithelial neoplasm and an intramucosal carcinoma must be made to avoid misinterpreting (or underestimating) the significance of these proliferations. The third perspective is the application of this information to intervention, devising strategies that will actually lower the ovarian cancer death rate by opportunistic salpingectomy, widespread comprehensive genetic screening and early detection. Central to this issue are the questions of (1) whether some STICs are metastatic, (2) whether lower-grade epithelial proliferations can invade prior to evolving into intraepithelial carcinoma, or (3) metastasize and become malignant elsewhere ('precursor escape'). An important caveat is the persistent and unsettling reality that many high-grade serous carcinomas are not associated with an obvious point of initiation in the fallopian tube. The pathologist sits squarely in the midst of all of these issues, and has a pivotal role in managing expectations for stemming the death rate from this lethal disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emily E K Meserve
- Division of Women's and Perinatal Pathology, Department of Pathology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA USA
| | - Jan Brouwer
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Christopher P Crum
- Division of Women's and Perinatal Pathology, Department of Pathology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA USA
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Tschernichovsky R, Goodman A. Risk-Reducing Strategies for Ovarian Cancer in BRCA Mutation Carriers: A Balancing Act. Oncologist 2017; 22:450-459. [PMID: 28314837 PMCID: PMC5388383 DOI: 10.1634/theoncologist.2016-0444] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/07/2016] [Accepted: 12/22/2016] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The objective of this study was to review the role of bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy in BRCA mutation (mBRCA) carriers and alternative interventions in risk reduction of ovarian cancer (OC). MATERIALS AND METHODS A systematic review using PubMed, MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane library was conducted to identify studies of different strategies to prevent OC in mBRCA carriers, including bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy, prophylactic salpingectomy with delayed oophorectomy, intensive surveillance, and chemoprevention. RESULTS Risk-reducing bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy is an effective intervention, but its associated morbidity is substantial and seems to curtail uptake rates among the target population. Although there is much interest and a strong theoretical basis for salpingectomy with delayed oophorectomy, data on its clinical application are scarce with regard to screening, the use of an algorithmic protocol has recently shown favorable albeit indefinite results in average-risk postmenopausal women. Its incorporation into studies focused on high-risk women might help solidify a future role for screening as a bridge to surgery. The use of oral contraceptives for chemoprevention is well supported by epidemiologic studies. However, there is a lack of evidence for advocating any of the other agents proposed for this purpose, including nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, vitamin D, and retinoids. CONCLUSION Further studies are needed before salpingectomy with delayed oophorectomy or intensive surveillance can be offered as acceptable, less morbid alternatives to upfront oophorectomy for mBRCA carriers. The Oncologist 2017;22:450-459 IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Risk-reducing bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy is currently the most effective method for reducing the risk of ovarian cancer in BRCA mutation (mBRCA) carriers. Unfortunately, it is associated with significant short- and long-term morbidity, stemming from reduced circulating estrogen. In recent years, much research has been devoted to evaluating less morbid alternatives, especially multimodal cancer screening and prophylactic salpingectomy with delayed oophorectomy. This review describes the present state of the art, with the aim of informing the counseling provided to mBRCA carriers on this complicated issue and encouraging additional research to facilitate the incorporation of such alternatives into routine practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Annekathryn Goodman
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
HE4 Serum Levels in Patients with BRCA1 Gene Mutation Undergoing Prophylactic Surgery as well as in Other Benign and Malignant Gynecological Diseases. DISEASE MARKERS 2017; 2017:9792756. [PMID: 28182133 PMCID: PMC5274692 DOI: 10.1155/2017/9792756] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/04/2016] [Revised: 11/17/2016] [Accepted: 12/01/2016] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
Objective. We assess the behavior of serum concentrations of HE4 marker in female carriers of BRCA1 and assess the diagnostic usefulness of HE4 in ovarian and endometrial cancer. Methods. A total of 619 women with BRCA1 gene mutation, ovarian, endometrial, metastatic, other gynecological cancers, or benign gynecological diseases were included. Intergroup comparative analyses were carried out, the BRCA1 gene carriers subgroup was subjected to detailed analysis, and ROC curves were determined for the assessment of diagnostic usefulness of HE4 in ovarian and endometrial cancer. Results. Statistically lower serum HE4 and CA 125 levels were observed in BRCA1 gene mutation premenopausal carriers. Occult ovarian/fallopian tube cancer was found 3.6%. Each of those patients was characterized by slightly elevated levels of either CA 125 (63.9 and 39.4 U/mL) or HE4 (79 pmol/L). The ROC-AUC curves were 0.892 and 0.894 for diagnostic usefulness of ovarian cancer and 0.865 for differentiation of endometrial cancer from endometrial polyps. Conclusions. Patients with BRCA1 gene mutations have relatively low serum HE4 levels. Even the slightest elevation in HE4 or CA 125 levels in female BRCA1 carriers undergoing prophylactic surgery should significantly increase oncological alertness. The HE4 marker is valuable in ovarian and uterine cancer diagnosis.
Collapse
|
27
|
Basha R, Mohiuddin Z, Rahim A, Ahmad S. Ovarian Cancer and Resistance to Therapies: Clinical and Laboratory Perspectives. DRUG RESISTANCE IN BACTERIA, FUNGI, MALARIA, AND CANCER 2017:511-537. [DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-48683-3_23] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/02/2025]
|
28
|
Affiliation(s)
- Anthony N Karnezis
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Kathleen R Cho
- Department of Pathology, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI, United States.
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Weinberger V, Bednarikova M, Cibula D, Zikan M. Serous tubal intraepithelial carcinoma (STIC) – clinical impact and management. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther 2016; 16:1311-1321. [DOI: 10.1080/14737140.2016.1247699] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/27/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Vit Weinberger
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Brno, Masaryk University, Faculty of Medicine, Brno, Czech Republic
| | - Marketa Bednarikova
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, University Hospital Brno, Masaryk University, Faculty of Medicine, Brno, Czech Republic
| | - David Cibula
- Gynecological Oncology Center, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Charles University in Prague – First Faculty of Medicine, Prague 2, Czech Republic
| | - Michal Zikan
- Gynecological Oncology Center, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Charles University in Prague – First Faculty of Medicine, Prague 2, Czech Republic
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Chudecka-Głaz A, Cymbaluk-Płoska A, Luterek-Puszyńska K, Menkiszak J. Diagnostic usefulness of the Risk of Ovarian Malignancy Algorithm using the electrochemiluminescence immunoassay for HE4 and the chemiluminescence microparticle immunoassay for CA125. Oncol Lett 2016; 12:3101-3114. [PMID: 27899969 PMCID: PMC5103905 DOI: 10.3892/ol.2016.5058] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/23/2015] [Accepted: 05/13/2016] [Indexed: 11/08/2022] Open
Abstract
The present study aimed to investigate the usefulness of the Risk of Ovarian Malignancy Algorithm (ROMA) in the preoperative stratification of patients with ovarian tumors using a novel combination of laboratory tests. The study group (n=619) consisted of 354 premenopausal and 265 postmenopausal patients. The levels of carbohydrate antigen 125 (CA125) and human epididymis protein 4 (HE4) were determined, and ROMA calculations were performed for each pre- and postmenopausal patient. HE4 levels were determined using an electrochemiluminescence immunoassay, while CA125 levels were determined by a chemiluminescence microparticle immunoassay. A contingency table was applied to calculate the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV). Receiver operating characteristic curves were also constructed, and areas under the curves (AUCs) were compared between the marker determinations and ROMA algorithms. In terms of distinguishing between ovarian cancer and benign disease, the sensitivity of ROMA was 88.3%, specificity was 88.2%, PPV was 75.3% and NPV was 94.9% among all patients. The respective parameters were 71.1, 90.1, 48.2 and 91.1% in premenopausal patients and 93.6, 82.9, 86.6 and 91.6% in postmenopausal patients. The AUC value for the ROMA algorithm was 0.926 for the ovarian cancer vs. benign groups in all patients, 0.813 in premenopausal patients and 0.939 in postmenopausal patients. The respective AUC values were 0.911, 0.879 and 0.934 for CA125; and 0.879, 0.783 and 0.889 for HE4. In this combination, the ROMA algorithm is characterized by an extremely high sensitivity of prediction of ovarian cancer in women with pelvic masses, and may constitute a precise tool with which to support the qualification of patients to appropriate surgical procedures. The ROMA may be useful in diagnosing ovarian endometrial changes in young patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anita Chudecka-Głaz
- Department of Gynecological Surgery and Gynecological Oncology of Adults and Adolescents, Pomeranian Medical University, Szczecin PL-70-111, Poland
| | - Aneta Cymbaluk-Płoska
- Department of Gynecological Surgery and Gynecological Oncology of Adults and Adolescents, Pomeranian Medical University, Szczecin PL-70-111, Poland
| | - Katarzyna Luterek-Puszyńska
- Department of Gynecological Surgery and Gynecological Oncology of Adults and Adolescents, Pomeranian Medical University, Szczecin PL-70-111, Poland
| | - Janusz Menkiszak
- Department of Gynecological Surgery and Gynecological Oncology of Adults and Adolescents, Pomeranian Medical University, Szczecin PL-70-111, Poland
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Koc N, Ayas S, Arinkan SA. Comparison of the Classical Method and SEE-FIM Protocol in Detecting Microscopic Lesions in Fallopian Tubes with Gynecological Lesions. J Pathol Transl Med 2016; 52:21-27. [PMID: 27539290 PMCID: PMC5784219 DOI: 10.4132/jptm.2016.06.17] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/13/2016] [Revised: 06/11/2016] [Accepted: 06/16/2016] [Indexed: 12/31/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The objective of this study was to compare the classical method and Sectioning and Extensively Examining the Fimbriated End Protocol (SEE-FIM) in detecting microscopic lesions in fallopian tubes with gynecological lesions. Methods From a total of 1,118 cases, 582 with various parts of both fallopian tubes sampled in three-ring-shape sections and 536 sampled with the SEE-FIM protocol were included in this study. Pathological findings of cases with endometrial carcinoma, non-uterine pelvic malignant tumor, ovarian borderline tumors, premalignancy, and benign lesions were compared. Results We detected two tubal infiltrative carcinomas among 40 uterine endometrioid adenocarcinomas, 15 serous tubal intraepithelial carcinomas in 39 non-uterine pelvic serous high-grade carcinoma cases, seven papillary tubal hyperplasias in 13 serous borderline tumor cases, and 11 endometriotic foci and four adenomatoid tumors among all cases sampled with the SEE-FIM protocol. Using the classical method, we detected only one serous tubal intraepithelial carcinoma in 113 non-uterine pelvic serous high-grade carcinoma cases and two papillary tubal hyperplasia cases in 31 serous borderline tumors. We did not identify additional findings in 185 uterine endometrioid carcinoma cases, and neither endometriotic focus nor adenomatoid tumor was shown in other lesions by the classical method. Conclusions Benign, premalignant, and malignant lesions can possibly be missed using the classical method. The SEE-FIM protocol should be considered especially in cases of endometrial carcinoma, nonuterine pelvic serous cancers, or serous borderline ovarian tumors. For other lesions, at least a detailed examination of the fimbrial end should be undertaken.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nermin Koc
- Department of Pathology, Zeynep Kamil Maternity and Pediatric Research and Training Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Selçuk Ayas
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Zeynep Kamil Maternity and Pediatric Research and Training Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Sevcan Arzu Arinkan
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Zeynep Kamil Maternity and Pediatric Research and Training Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Botesteanu DA, Lipkowitz S, Lee JM, Levy D. Mathematical models of breast and ovarian cancers. WILEY INTERDISCIPLINARY REVIEWS-SYSTEMS BIOLOGY AND MEDICINE 2016; 8:337-62. [PMID: 27259061 DOI: 10.1002/wsbm.1343] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/04/2016] [Revised: 04/13/2016] [Accepted: 04/14/2016] [Indexed: 01/06/2023]
Abstract
Women constitute the majority of the aging United States (US) population, and this has substantial implications on cancer population patterns and management practices. Breast cancer is the most common women's malignancy, while ovarian cancer is the most fatal gynecological malignancy in the US. In this review, we focus on these subsets of women's cancers, seen more commonly in postmenopausal and elderly women. In order to systematically investigate the complexity of cancer progression and response to treatment in breast and ovarian malignancies, we assert that integrated mathematical modeling frameworks viewed from a systems biology perspective are needed. Such integrated frameworks could offer innovative contributions to the clinical women's cancers community, as answers to clinical questions cannot always be reached with contemporary clinical and experimental tools. Here, we recapitulate clinically known data regarding the progression and treatment of the breast and ovarian cancers. We compare and contrast the two malignancies whenever possible in order to emphasize areas where substantial contributions could be made by clinically inspired and validated mathematical modeling. We show how current paradigms in the mathematical oncology community focusing on the two malignancies do not make comprehensive use of, nor substantially reflect existing clinical data, and we highlight the modeling areas in most critical need of clinical data integration. We emphasize that the primary goal of any mathematical study of women's cancers should be to address clinically relevant questions. WIREs Syst Biol Med 2016, 8:337-362. doi: 10.1002/wsbm.1343 For further resources related to this article, please visit the WIREs website.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dana-Adriana Botesteanu
- Department of Mathematics and Center for Scientific Computation and Mathematical Modeling (CSCAMM), University of Maryland, College Park, MD, USA.,Women's Malignancies Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Stanley Lipkowitz
- Women's Malignancies Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Jung-Min Lee
- Women's Malignancies Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Doron Levy
- Department of Mathematics and Center for Scientific Computation and Mathematical Modeling (CSCAMM), University of Maryland, College Park, MD, USA
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Botesteanu DA, Lee JM, Levy D. Modeling the Dynamics of High-Grade Serous Ovarian Cancer Progression for Transvaginal Ultrasound-Based Screening and Early Detection. PLoS One 2016; 11:e0156661. [PMID: 27257824 PMCID: PMC4892570 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0156661] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/05/2016] [Accepted: 05/17/2016] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
High-grade serous ovarian cancer (HGSOC) represents the majority of ovarian cancers and accounts for the largest proportion of deaths from the disease. A timely detection of low volume HGSOC should be the goal of any screening studies. However, numerous transvaginal ultrasound (TVU) detection-based population studies aimed at detecting low-volume disease have not yielded reduced mortality rates. A quantitative invalidation of TVU as an effective HGSOC screening strategy is a necessary next step. Herein, we propose a mathematical model for a quantitative explanation on the reported failure of TVU-based screening to improve HGSOC low-volume detectability and overall survival.We develop a novel in silico mathematical assessment of the efficacy of a unimodal TVU monitoring regimen as a strategy aimed at detecting low-volume HGSOC in cancer-positive cases, defined as cases for which the inception of the first malignant cell has already occurred. Our findings show that the median window of opportunity interval length for TVU monitoring and HGSOC detection is approximately 1.76 years. This does not translate into reduced mortality levels or improved detection accuracy in an in silico cohort across multiple TVU monitoring frequencies or detection sensitivities. We demonstrate that even a semiannual, unimodal TVU monitoring protocol is expected to miss detectable HGSOC. Lastly, we find that circa 50% of the simulated HGSOC growth curves never reach the baseline detectability threshold, and that on average, 5-7 infrequent, rate-limiting stochastic changes in the growth parameters are associated with reaching HGSOC detectability and mortality thresholds respectively. Focusing on a malignancy poorly studied in the mathematical oncology community, our model captures the dynamic, temporal evolution of HGSOC progression. Our mathematical model is consistent with recent case reports and prospective TVU screening population studies, and provides support to the empirical recommendation against frequent HGSOC screening.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dana-Adriana Botesteanu
- Department of Mathematics and Center for Scientific Computation and Mathematical Modeling (CSCAMM), University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland, United States of America
- Women’s Malignancies Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland, United States of America
| | - Jung-Min Lee
- Women’s Malignancies Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland, United States of America
| | - Doron Levy
- Department of Mathematics and Center for Scientific Computation and Mathematical Modeling (CSCAMM), University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
George SHL, Garcia R, Slomovitz BM. Ovarian Cancer: The Fallopian Tube as the Site of Origin and Opportunities for Prevention. Front Oncol 2016; 6:108. [PMID: 27200296 PMCID: PMC4852190 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2016.00108] [Citation(s) in RCA: 44] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/25/2016] [Accepted: 04/18/2016] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
High-grade serous carcinoma (HGSC) is the most common and aggressive histotype of epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC), and it is the predominant histotype associated with hereditary breast and ovarian cancer syndrome (HBOC). Mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2 are responsible for most of the known causes of HBOC, while mutations in mismatch repair genes and several genes of moderate penetrance are responsible for the remaining known hereditary risk. Women with a history of familial ovarian cancer or with known germline mutations in highly penetrant genes are offered the option of risk-reducing surgery that involves the removal of the ovaries and fallopian tubes (salpingo-oophorectomy). Growing evidence now supports the fallopian tube epithelia as an etiological site for the development of HGSC and consequently, salpingectomy alone is emerging as a prophylactic option. This review discusses the site of origin of EOC, the rationale for risk-reducing salpingectomy in the high-risk population, and opportunities for salpingectomy in the low-risk population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sophia H L George
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecology Oncology, Miller School of Medicine, University of Miami, Miami, FL, USA; Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, Miller School of Medicine, University of Miami, Miami, FL, USA
| | - Ruslan Garcia
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecology Oncology, Miller School of Medicine, University of Miami , Miami, FL , USA
| | - Brian M Slomovitz
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecology Oncology, Miller School of Medicine, University of Miami, Miami, FL, USA; Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, Miller School of Medicine, University of Miami, Miami, FL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Chay WY, McCluggage WG, Lee CH, Köbel M, Irving J, Millar J, Gilks CB, Tinker AV. Outcomes of Incidental Fallopian Tube High-Grade Serous Carcinoma and Serous Tubal Intraepithelial Carcinoma in Women at Low Risk of Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2016; 26:431-6. [PMID: 26807643 DOI: 10.1097/igc.0000000000000639] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/22/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The natural history and optimal management of serous tubal intraepithelial carcinoma (STIC), regardless of BRCA status, is unknown. We report the follow-up findings of a series of incidental fallopian tube high-grade serous carcinomas (HGSCs) and STICs identified in women at low risk for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer (HBOC), undergoing surgery for other indications. MATERIALS AND METHODS Cases of incidental STIC and HGSC were identified from 2008. Patients with known BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations, or a family history of ovarian or breast cancer before the diagnosis of STIC or HGSC were excluded. A retrospective chart review was conducted to obtain clinical data. RESULTS Eighteen cases were identified with a median follow-up of 25 months (range, 4-88 months). Twelve of 18 patients had a diagnosis of STIC with no associated invasive HGSC and 6 had STIC associated with other invasive malignancies. Completion staging surgery was performed on 7 of the 18 patients, including 5 of 12 in which there was STIC only identified on primary surgery; 3 cases were upstaged from STIC only to HGSC based on the staging surgery. Recurrence of HGSC occurred in 2 of the 18 patients. BRCA testing was performed on 3 patients, 1 of whom tested positive for a pathogenic BRCA1 mutation. CONCLUSIONS Our study suggests that completion staging surgery for incidental STICs in non-BRCA patients may be considered. These patients should be offered hereditary testing. The Pelvic-Ovarian cancer INTerception (POINT) Project is an international registry set up to add to our understanding of STICs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wen Yee Chay
- *Department of Medical Oncology, British Columbia Cancer Agency, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada; †National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore; ‡Department of Pathology, Belfast Health and Social Care Trust, Belfast, United Kingdom; §Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Royal Alexandra Hospital, University of Alberta, Edmonton; ∥Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta; ¶Department of Pathology, Royal Jubilee Hospital and the University of British Columbia, Victoria, British Columbia, Canada; #Department of Oncology, NI Cancer Centre, Belfast Health and Social Care Trust, Belfast, United Kingdom; and **Department of Pathology, Vancouver General Hospital and the University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
36
|
Yang Q, Nair S, Laknaur A, Ismail N, Diamond MP, Al-Hendy A. The Polycomb Group Protein EZH2 Impairs DNA Damage Repair Gene Expression in Human Uterine Fibroids. Biol Reprod 2016; 94:69. [PMID: 26888970 PMCID: PMC4829092 DOI: 10.1095/biolreprod.115.134924] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/26/2015] [Accepted: 02/03/2016] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Uterine fibroids are benign, smooth muscle tumors that occur in approximately 70%-80% of women by age 50 yr. The cellular and molecular mechanism(s) by which uterine fibroids (UFs) develop are not fully understood. Accumulating evidence demonstrates that several genetic abnormalities, including deletions, rearrangements, translocations, as well as mutations, have been found in UFs. These genetic anomalies suggest that low DNA damage repair capacity may be involved in UF formation. The objective of this study was to determine whether expression levels of DNA damage repair-related genes were altered, and how they were regulated in the pathogenesis of UFs. Expression levels of DNA repair-related genes RAD51 and BRCA1 were deregulated in fibroid tissues as compared to adjacent myometrial tissues. Expression levels of chromatin protein enhancer of zeste homolog 2 (EZH2) were higher in a subset of fibroids as compared to adjacent myometrial tissues by both immunohistochemistry and Western blot analysis. Treatment with an inhibitor of EZH2 markedly increased expression levels of RAD51 and BRCA1 in fibroid cells and inhibited cell proliferation paired with cell cycle arrest. Restoring the expression of RAD51 and BRCA1 by treatment with EZH2 inhibitor was dependent on reducing the enrichment of trimethylation of histone 3 lysine 27 epigenetic mark in their promoter regions. This study reveals the important role of EZH2-regulated DNA damage-repair genes via histone methylation in fibroid biology, and may provide novel therapeutic targets for the medical treatment of women with symptomatic UFs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Qiwei Yang
- Division of Translation Research, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Augusta University, Medical College of Georgia, Augusta, Georgia
| | - Sangeeta Nair
- Division of Translation Research, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Augusta University, Medical College of Georgia, Augusta, Georgia
| | - Archana Laknaur
- Division of Translation Research, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Augusta University, Medical College of Georgia, Augusta, Georgia
| | - Nahed Ismail
- Clinical Microbiology Division, Department of Pathology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Michael P Diamond
- Division of Translation Research, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Augusta University, Medical College of Georgia, Augusta, Georgia
| | - Ayman Al-Hendy
- Division of Translation Research, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Augusta University, Medical College of Georgia, Augusta, Georgia
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Patrono MG, Iniesta MD, Malpica A, Lu KH, Fernandez RO, Salvo G, Ramirez PT. Clinical outcomes in patients with isolated serous tubal intraepithelial carcinoma (STIC): A comprehensive review. Gynecol Oncol 2015; 139:568-72. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2015.09.018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 45] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/21/2015] [Revised: 09/18/2015] [Accepted: 09/21/2015] [Indexed: 01/16/2023]
|
38
|
Maritschnegg E, Wang Y, Pecha N, Horvat R, Van Nieuwenhuysen E, Vergote I, Heitz F, Sehouli J, Kinde I, Diaz LA, Papadopoulos N, Kinzler KW, Vogelstein B, Speiser P, Zeillinger R. Lavage of the Uterine Cavity for Molecular Detection of Müllerian Duct Carcinomas: A Proof-of-Concept Study. J Clin Oncol 2015; 33:4293-300. [PMID: 26552420 PMCID: PMC4678180 DOI: 10.1200/jco.2015.61.3083] [Citation(s) in RCA: 87] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/09/2023] Open
Abstract
Purpose Type II ovarian cancer (OC) and endometrial cancer (EC) are generally diagnosed at an advanced stage, translating into a poor survival rate. There is increasing evidence that Müllerian duct cancers may exfoliate cells. We have established an approach for lavage of the uterine cavity to detect shed cancer cells. Patients and Methods Lavage of the uterine cavity was used to obtain samples from 65 patients, including 30 with OC, five with EC, three with other malignancies, and 27 with benign lesions involving gynecologic organs. These samples, as well as corresponding tumor tissue, were examined for the presence of somatic mutations using massively parallel sequencing (next-generation sequencing) and, in a subset, singleplex analysis. Results The lavage technique could be applied successfully, and sufficient amounts of DNA were obtained in all patients. Mutations, mainly in TP53, were identified in 18 (60%) of 30 lavage samples of patients with OC using next-generation sequencing. Singleplex analysis of mutations previously determined in corresponding tumor tissue led to further identification of six patients. Taken together, in 24 (80%) of 30 patients with OC, specific mutations could be identified. This also included one patient with occult OC. All five analyzed lavage specimens from patients with EC harbored mutations. Eight (29.6%) of 27 patients with benign lesions tested positive for mutations, six (75%) as a result of mutations in the KRAS gene. Conclusion This study proved that tumor cells from ovarian neoplasms are shed and can be collected via lavage of the uterine cavity. Detection of OC and EC and even clinically occult OC was achieved, making it a potential tool of significant promise for early diagnosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elisabeth Maritschnegg
- Elisabeth Maritschnegg, Nina Pecha, Reinhard Horvat, Paul Speiser, and Robert Zeillinger, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Yuxuan Wang, Isaac Kinde, Luis A. Diaz Jr, Nickolas Papadopoulos, Kenneth W. Kinzler, and Bert Vogelstein, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD; Els Van Nieuwenhuysen and Ignace Vergote, Leuven Cancer Institute, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Florian Heitz, Kliniken Essen Mitte, Essen; and Jalid Sehouli, Charité Medical University, Berlin, Germany
| | - Yuxuan Wang
- Elisabeth Maritschnegg, Nina Pecha, Reinhard Horvat, Paul Speiser, and Robert Zeillinger, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Yuxuan Wang, Isaac Kinde, Luis A. Diaz Jr, Nickolas Papadopoulos, Kenneth W. Kinzler, and Bert Vogelstein, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD; Els Van Nieuwenhuysen and Ignace Vergote, Leuven Cancer Institute, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Florian Heitz, Kliniken Essen Mitte, Essen; and Jalid Sehouli, Charité Medical University, Berlin, Germany
| | - Nina Pecha
- Elisabeth Maritschnegg, Nina Pecha, Reinhard Horvat, Paul Speiser, and Robert Zeillinger, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Yuxuan Wang, Isaac Kinde, Luis A. Diaz Jr, Nickolas Papadopoulos, Kenneth W. Kinzler, and Bert Vogelstein, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD; Els Van Nieuwenhuysen and Ignace Vergote, Leuven Cancer Institute, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Florian Heitz, Kliniken Essen Mitte, Essen; and Jalid Sehouli, Charité Medical University, Berlin, Germany
| | - Reinhard Horvat
- Elisabeth Maritschnegg, Nina Pecha, Reinhard Horvat, Paul Speiser, and Robert Zeillinger, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Yuxuan Wang, Isaac Kinde, Luis A. Diaz Jr, Nickolas Papadopoulos, Kenneth W. Kinzler, and Bert Vogelstein, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD; Els Van Nieuwenhuysen and Ignace Vergote, Leuven Cancer Institute, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Florian Heitz, Kliniken Essen Mitte, Essen; and Jalid Sehouli, Charité Medical University, Berlin, Germany
| | - Els Van Nieuwenhuysen
- Elisabeth Maritschnegg, Nina Pecha, Reinhard Horvat, Paul Speiser, and Robert Zeillinger, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Yuxuan Wang, Isaac Kinde, Luis A. Diaz Jr, Nickolas Papadopoulos, Kenneth W. Kinzler, and Bert Vogelstein, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD; Els Van Nieuwenhuysen and Ignace Vergote, Leuven Cancer Institute, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Florian Heitz, Kliniken Essen Mitte, Essen; and Jalid Sehouli, Charité Medical University, Berlin, Germany
| | - Ignace Vergote
- Elisabeth Maritschnegg, Nina Pecha, Reinhard Horvat, Paul Speiser, and Robert Zeillinger, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Yuxuan Wang, Isaac Kinde, Luis A. Diaz Jr, Nickolas Papadopoulos, Kenneth W. Kinzler, and Bert Vogelstein, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD; Els Van Nieuwenhuysen and Ignace Vergote, Leuven Cancer Institute, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Florian Heitz, Kliniken Essen Mitte, Essen; and Jalid Sehouli, Charité Medical University, Berlin, Germany
| | - Florian Heitz
- Elisabeth Maritschnegg, Nina Pecha, Reinhard Horvat, Paul Speiser, and Robert Zeillinger, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Yuxuan Wang, Isaac Kinde, Luis A. Diaz Jr, Nickolas Papadopoulos, Kenneth W. Kinzler, and Bert Vogelstein, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD; Els Van Nieuwenhuysen and Ignace Vergote, Leuven Cancer Institute, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Florian Heitz, Kliniken Essen Mitte, Essen; and Jalid Sehouli, Charité Medical University, Berlin, Germany
| | - Jalid Sehouli
- Elisabeth Maritschnegg, Nina Pecha, Reinhard Horvat, Paul Speiser, and Robert Zeillinger, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Yuxuan Wang, Isaac Kinde, Luis A. Diaz Jr, Nickolas Papadopoulos, Kenneth W. Kinzler, and Bert Vogelstein, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD; Els Van Nieuwenhuysen and Ignace Vergote, Leuven Cancer Institute, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Florian Heitz, Kliniken Essen Mitte, Essen; and Jalid Sehouli, Charité Medical University, Berlin, Germany
| | - Isaac Kinde
- Elisabeth Maritschnegg, Nina Pecha, Reinhard Horvat, Paul Speiser, and Robert Zeillinger, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Yuxuan Wang, Isaac Kinde, Luis A. Diaz Jr, Nickolas Papadopoulos, Kenneth W. Kinzler, and Bert Vogelstein, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD; Els Van Nieuwenhuysen and Ignace Vergote, Leuven Cancer Institute, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Florian Heitz, Kliniken Essen Mitte, Essen; and Jalid Sehouli, Charité Medical University, Berlin, Germany
| | - Luis A Diaz
- Elisabeth Maritschnegg, Nina Pecha, Reinhard Horvat, Paul Speiser, and Robert Zeillinger, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Yuxuan Wang, Isaac Kinde, Luis A. Diaz Jr, Nickolas Papadopoulos, Kenneth W. Kinzler, and Bert Vogelstein, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD; Els Van Nieuwenhuysen and Ignace Vergote, Leuven Cancer Institute, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Florian Heitz, Kliniken Essen Mitte, Essen; and Jalid Sehouli, Charité Medical University, Berlin, Germany
| | - Nickolas Papadopoulos
- Elisabeth Maritschnegg, Nina Pecha, Reinhard Horvat, Paul Speiser, and Robert Zeillinger, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Yuxuan Wang, Isaac Kinde, Luis A. Diaz Jr, Nickolas Papadopoulos, Kenneth W. Kinzler, and Bert Vogelstein, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD; Els Van Nieuwenhuysen and Ignace Vergote, Leuven Cancer Institute, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Florian Heitz, Kliniken Essen Mitte, Essen; and Jalid Sehouli, Charité Medical University, Berlin, Germany
| | - Kenneth W Kinzler
- Elisabeth Maritschnegg, Nina Pecha, Reinhard Horvat, Paul Speiser, and Robert Zeillinger, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Yuxuan Wang, Isaac Kinde, Luis A. Diaz Jr, Nickolas Papadopoulos, Kenneth W. Kinzler, and Bert Vogelstein, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD; Els Van Nieuwenhuysen and Ignace Vergote, Leuven Cancer Institute, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Florian Heitz, Kliniken Essen Mitte, Essen; and Jalid Sehouli, Charité Medical University, Berlin, Germany
| | - Bert Vogelstein
- Elisabeth Maritschnegg, Nina Pecha, Reinhard Horvat, Paul Speiser, and Robert Zeillinger, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Yuxuan Wang, Isaac Kinde, Luis A. Diaz Jr, Nickolas Papadopoulos, Kenneth W. Kinzler, and Bert Vogelstein, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD; Els Van Nieuwenhuysen and Ignace Vergote, Leuven Cancer Institute, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Florian Heitz, Kliniken Essen Mitte, Essen; and Jalid Sehouli, Charité Medical University, Berlin, Germany
| | - Paul Speiser
- Elisabeth Maritschnegg, Nina Pecha, Reinhard Horvat, Paul Speiser, and Robert Zeillinger, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Yuxuan Wang, Isaac Kinde, Luis A. Diaz Jr, Nickolas Papadopoulos, Kenneth W. Kinzler, and Bert Vogelstein, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD; Els Van Nieuwenhuysen and Ignace Vergote, Leuven Cancer Institute, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Florian Heitz, Kliniken Essen Mitte, Essen; and Jalid Sehouli, Charité Medical University, Berlin, Germany.
| | - Robert Zeillinger
- Elisabeth Maritschnegg, Nina Pecha, Reinhard Horvat, Paul Speiser, and Robert Zeillinger, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Yuxuan Wang, Isaac Kinde, Luis A. Diaz Jr, Nickolas Papadopoulos, Kenneth W. Kinzler, and Bert Vogelstein, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD; Els Van Nieuwenhuysen and Ignace Vergote, Leuven Cancer Institute, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Florian Heitz, Kliniken Essen Mitte, Essen; and Jalid Sehouli, Charité Medical University, Berlin, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Selmes G, Ferron G, Filleron T, Querleu D, Mery E. Lésions épithéliales précoces dans les annexectomies prophylactiques chez des patientes à haut risque de cancer de l’ovaire : à propos d’une série de 93 cas. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2015; 43:659-64. [DOI: 10.1016/j.gyobfe.2015.07.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/08/2015] [Accepted: 07/08/2015] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
|
40
|
The secondary Müllerian system, field effect, BRCA, and tubal fimbria: our evolving understanding of the origin of tubo-ovarian high-grade serous carcinoma and why assignment of primary site matters. Pathology 2015; 47:423-31. [DOI: 10.1097/pat.0000000000000291] [Citation(s) in RCA: 40] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
|
41
|
Endometrial Cancers in Mutation Carriers From Hereditary Breast Ovarian Cancer Syndrome Kindreds: Report From the Creighton University Hereditary Cancer Registry With Review of the Implications. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2015; 25:650-6. [DOI: 10.1097/igc.0000000000000402] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
ObjectiveThe aim of this study was to categorize and report endometrial cancers in mutation carriers from hereditary breast ovarian cancer families.MethodsOur Hereditary Cancer Registry was searched for gynecologic and peritoneal cancers linked to mutations in BRCA1 or BRCA2. Invasive cancers were registered in 101 mutation carriers with complete pathology reports. Efforts were made to secure diagnostic surgical pathology tissues for review. All records and available diagnostic slides were meticulously studied, and primary cancers were classified.FindingsEight malignancies were classified as primary endometrial cancers. Five of these were low- or intermediate-grade endometrioid carcinomas, and 3 were pure serous carcinomas or contained serous carcinoma elements mixed with high-grade endometrioid carcinoma. Breast cancers were diagnosed in 5 patients before and in 1 patient after endometrial carcinoma. Three endometrioid carcinomas were preceded by estrogen treatment, 2 for many years and the other for only 2 months, and 2 of the patients with serous carcinoma had been treated with tamoxifen.ConclusionsThe finding that 8 of gynecologic and peritoneal cancers in 101 mutation carriers were endometrial cancers with a smaller proportion of endometrioid carcinomas than reported in general populations is added to the current controversial literature on endometrial cancer, particularly regarding serous carcinomas, in hereditary breast ovarian cancer syndrome. Well-designed prospective programs for standardized surgical and pathologic handling, processing, and reporting are essential for working out the pathogenesis, true risks, and best management of this disease in carriers of deleterious BRCA1 and BRCA2 germline mutations.
Collapse
|
42
|
Serous Tubal Intraepithelial Carcinoma Localizes to the Tubal-peritoneal Junction. Int J Gynecol Pathol 2015; 34:112-20. [DOI: 10.1097/pgp.0000000000000123] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
|
43
|
Sherman ME, Piedmonte M, Mai PL, Ioffe OB, Ronnett BM, Van Le L, Ivanov I, Bell MC, Blank SV, DiSilvestro P, Hamilton CA, Tewari KS, Wakeley K, Kauff ND, Yamada SD, Rodriguez G, Skates SJ, Alberts DS, Walker JL, Minasian L, Lu K, Greene MH. Pathologic findings at risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy: primary results from Gynecologic Oncology Group Trial GOG-0199. J Clin Oncol 2014; 32:3275-83. [PMID: 25199754 DOI: 10.1200/jco.2013.54.1987] [Citation(s) in RCA: 96] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/26/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy (RRSO) lowers mortality from ovarian/tubal and breast cancers among BRCA1/2 mutation carriers. Uncertainties persist regarding potential benefits of RRSO among high-risk noncarriers, optimal surgical age, and anatomic origin of clinically occult cancers detected at surgery. To address these topics, we analyzed surgical treatment arm results from Gynecologic Oncology Group Protocol-0199 (GOG-0199), the National Ovarian Cancer Prevention and Early Detection Study. PARTICIPANTS AND METHODS This analysis included asymptomatic high-risk women age ≥ 30 years who elected RRSO at enrollment. Women provided risk factor data and underwent preoperative cancer antigen 125 (CA-125) serum testing and transvaginal ultrasound (TVU). RRSO specimens were processed according to a standardized tissue processing protocol and underwent central pathology panel review. Research-based BRCA1/2 mutation testing was performed when a participant's mutation status was unknown at enrollment. Relationships between participant characteristics and diagnostic findings were assessed using univariable statistics and multivariable logistic regression. RESULTS Invasive or intraepithelial ovarian/tubal/peritoneal neoplasms were detected in 25 (2.6%) of 966 RRSOs (BRCA1 mutation carriers, 4.6%; BRCA2 carriers, 3.5%; and noncarriers, 0.5%; P < .001). In multivariable models, positive BRCA1/2 mutation status (P = .0056), postmenopausal status (P = .0023), and abnormal CA-125 levels and/or TVU examinations (P < .001) were associated with detection of clinically occult neoplasms at RRSO. For 387 women with negative BRCA1/2 mutation testing and normal CA-125 levels, findings at RRSO were benign. CONCLUSION Clinically occult cancer was detected among 2.6% of high-risk women undergoing RRSO. BRCA1/2 mutation, postmenopausal status, and abnormal preoperative CA-125 and/or TVU were associated with cancer detection at RRSO. These data can inform management decisions among women at high risk of ovarian/tubal cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mark E Sherman
- Mark E. Sherman, Phuong L. Mai, Lori Minasian, and Mark H. Greene, National Cancer Institute, Rockville; Olga B. Ioffe, University of Maryland Medical Center; Brigitte M. Ronnett, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore; Chad A. Hamilton, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, MD; Marion Piedmonte, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo; Stephanie V. Blank, New York University School of Medicine; Noah D. Kauff, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; New York, NY; Linda Van Le, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC; Iouri Ivanov, Columbus Cancer Council, Columbus, OH; Maria C. Bell, Sanford University of South Dakota Medical Center, Sioux Falls, SD; Paul DiSilvestro, Women and Infants Hospital, Providence, RI; Krishnansu S. Tewari, University of California Medical Center Irvine, Orange, CA; Katie Wakeley, Tufts University; Steven J. Skates, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA; S. Diane Yamada, University of Chicago, Chicago; Gustavo Rodriguez, North Shore University Health System, Evanston, IL; David S. Alberts, University of Arizona Cancer Center, Tucson, AZ; Joan L. Walker, University of Oklahoma, Oklahoma City, OK; and Karen Lu, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Marion Piedmonte
- Mark E. Sherman, Phuong L. Mai, Lori Minasian, and Mark H. Greene, National Cancer Institute, Rockville; Olga B. Ioffe, University of Maryland Medical Center; Brigitte M. Ronnett, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore; Chad A. Hamilton, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, MD; Marion Piedmonte, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo; Stephanie V. Blank, New York University School of Medicine; Noah D. Kauff, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; New York, NY; Linda Van Le, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC; Iouri Ivanov, Columbus Cancer Council, Columbus, OH; Maria C. Bell, Sanford University of South Dakota Medical Center, Sioux Falls, SD; Paul DiSilvestro, Women and Infants Hospital, Providence, RI; Krishnansu S. Tewari, University of California Medical Center Irvine, Orange, CA; Katie Wakeley, Tufts University; Steven J. Skates, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA; S. Diane Yamada, University of Chicago, Chicago; Gustavo Rodriguez, North Shore University Health System, Evanston, IL; David S. Alberts, University of Arizona Cancer Center, Tucson, AZ; Joan L. Walker, University of Oklahoma, Oklahoma City, OK; and Karen Lu, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Phuong L Mai
- Mark E. Sherman, Phuong L. Mai, Lori Minasian, and Mark H. Greene, National Cancer Institute, Rockville; Olga B. Ioffe, University of Maryland Medical Center; Brigitte M. Ronnett, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore; Chad A. Hamilton, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, MD; Marion Piedmonte, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo; Stephanie V. Blank, New York University School of Medicine; Noah D. Kauff, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; New York, NY; Linda Van Le, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC; Iouri Ivanov, Columbus Cancer Council, Columbus, OH; Maria C. Bell, Sanford University of South Dakota Medical Center, Sioux Falls, SD; Paul DiSilvestro, Women and Infants Hospital, Providence, RI; Krishnansu S. Tewari, University of California Medical Center Irvine, Orange, CA; Katie Wakeley, Tufts University; Steven J. Skates, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA; S. Diane Yamada, University of Chicago, Chicago; Gustavo Rodriguez, North Shore University Health System, Evanston, IL; David S. Alberts, University of Arizona Cancer Center, Tucson, AZ; Joan L. Walker, University of Oklahoma, Oklahoma City, OK; and Karen Lu, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Olga B Ioffe
- Mark E. Sherman, Phuong L. Mai, Lori Minasian, and Mark H. Greene, National Cancer Institute, Rockville; Olga B. Ioffe, University of Maryland Medical Center; Brigitte M. Ronnett, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore; Chad A. Hamilton, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, MD; Marion Piedmonte, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo; Stephanie V. Blank, New York University School of Medicine; Noah D. Kauff, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; New York, NY; Linda Van Le, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC; Iouri Ivanov, Columbus Cancer Council, Columbus, OH; Maria C. Bell, Sanford University of South Dakota Medical Center, Sioux Falls, SD; Paul DiSilvestro, Women and Infants Hospital, Providence, RI; Krishnansu S. Tewari, University of California Medical Center Irvine, Orange, CA; Katie Wakeley, Tufts University; Steven J. Skates, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA; S. Diane Yamada, University of Chicago, Chicago; Gustavo Rodriguez, North Shore University Health System, Evanston, IL; David S. Alberts, University of Arizona Cancer Center, Tucson, AZ; Joan L. Walker, University of Oklahoma, Oklahoma City, OK; and Karen Lu, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Brigitte M Ronnett
- Mark E. Sherman, Phuong L. Mai, Lori Minasian, and Mark H. Greene, National Cancer Institute, Rockville; Olga B. Ioffe, University of Maryland Medical Center; Brigitte M. Ronnett, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore; Chad A. Hamilton, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, MD; Marion Piedmonte, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo; Stephanie V. Blank, New York University School of Medicine; Noah D. Kauff, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; New York, NY; Linda Van Le, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC; Iouri Ivanov, Columbus Cancer Council, Columbus, OH; Maria C. Bell, Sanford University of South Dakota Medical Center, Sioux Falls, SD; Paul DiSilvestro, Women and Infants Hospital, Providence, RI; Krishnansu S. Tewari, University of California Medical Center Irvine, Orange, CA; Katie Wakeley, Tufts University; Steven J. Skates, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA; S. Diane Yamada, University of Chicago, Chicago; Gustavo Rodriguez, North Shore University Health System, Evanston, IL; David S. Alberts, University of Arizona Cancer Center, Tucson, AZ; Joan L. Walker, University of Oklahoma, Oklahoma City, OK; and Karen Lu, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Linda Van Le
- Mark E. Sherman, Phuong L. Mai, Lori Minasian, and Mark H. Greene, National Cancer Institute, Rockville; Olga B. Ioffe, University of Maryland Medical Center; Brigitte M. Ronnett, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore; Chad A. Hamilton, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, MD; Marion Piedmonte, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo; Stephanie V. Blank, New York University School of Medicine; Noah D. Kauff, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; New York, NY; Linda Van Le, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC; Iouri Ivanov, Columbus Cancer Council, Columbus, OH; Maria C. Bell, Sanford University of South Dakota Medical Center, Sioux Falls, SD; Paul DiSilvestro, Women and Infants Hospital, Providence, RI; Krishnansu S. Tewari, University of California Medical Center Irvine, Orange, CA; Katie Wakeley, Tufts University; Steven J. Skates, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA; S. Diane Yamada, University of Chicago, Chicago; Gustavo Rodriguez, North Shore University Health System, Evanston, IL; David S. Alberts, University of Arizona Cancer Center, Tucson, AZ; Joan L. Walker, University of Oklahoma, Oklahoma City, OK; and Karen Lu, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Iouri Ivanov
- Mark E. Sherman, Phuong L. Mai, Lori Minasian, and Mark H. Greene, National Cancer Institute, Rockville; Olga B. Ioffe, University of Maryland Medical Center; Brigitte M. Ronnett, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore; Chad A. Hamilton, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, MD; Marion Piedmonte, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo; Stephanie V. Blank, New York University School of Medicine; Noah D. Kauff, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; New York, NY; Linda Van Le, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC; Iouri Ivanov, Columbus Cancer Council, Columbus, OH; Maria C. Bell, Sanford University of South Dakota Medical Center, Sioux Falls, SD; Paul DiSilvestro, Women and Infants Hospital, Providence, RI; Krishnansu S. Tewari, University of California Medical Center Irvine, Orange, CA; Katie Wakeley, Tufts University; Steven J. Skates, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA; S. Diane Yamada, University of Chicago, Chicago; Gustavo Rodriguez, North Shore University Health System, Evanston, IL; David S. Alberts, University of Arizona Cancer Center, Tucson, AZ; Joan L. Walker, University of Oklahoma, Oklahoma City, OK; and Karen Lu, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Maria C Bell
- Mark E. Sherman, Phuong L. Mai, Lori Minasian, and Mark H. Greene, National Cancer Institute, Rockville; Olga B. Ioffe, University of Maryland Medical Center; Brigitte M. Ronnett, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore; Chad A. Hamilton, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, MD; Marion Piedmonte, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo; Stephanie V. Blank, New York University School of Medicine; Noah D. Kauff, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; New York, NY; Linda Van Le, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC; Iouri Ivanov, Columbus Cancer Council, Columbus, OH; Maria C. Bell, Sanford University of South Dakota Medical Center, Sioux Falls, SD; Paul DiSilvestro, Women and Infants Hospital, Providence, RI; Krishnansu S. Tewari, University of California Medical Center Irvine, Orange, CA; Katie Wakeley, Tufts University; Steven J. Skates, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA; S. Diane Yamada, University of Chicago, Chicago; Gustavo Rodriguez, North Shore University Health System, Evanston, IL; David S. Alberts, University of Arizona Cancer Center, Tucson, AZ; Joan L. Walker, University of Oklahoma, Oklahoma City, OK; and Karen Lu, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Stephanie V Blank
- Mark E. Sherman, Phuong L. Mai, Lori Minasian, and Mark H. Greene, National Cancer Institute, Rockville; Olga B. Ioffe, University of Maryland Medical Center; Brigitte M. Ronnett, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore; Chad A. Hamilton, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, MD; Marion Piedmonte, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo; Stephanie V. Blank, New York University School of Medicine; Noah D. Kauff, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; New York, NY; Linda Van Le, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC; Iouri Ivanov, Columbus Cancer Council, Columbus, OH; Maria C. Bell, Sanford University of South Dakota Medical Center, Sioux Falls, SD; Paul DiSilvestro, Women and Infants Hospital, Providence, RI; Krishnansu S. Tewari, University of California Medical Center Irvine, Orange, CA; Katie Wakeley, Tufts University; Steven J. Skates, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA; S. Diane Yamada, University of Chicago, Chicago; Gustavo Rodriguez, North Shore University Health System, Evanston, IL; David S. Alberts, University of Arizona Cancer Center, Tucson, AZ; Joan L. Walker, University of Oklahoma, Oklahoma City, OK; and Karen Lu, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Paul DiSilvestro
- Mark E. Sherman, Phuong L. Mai, Lori Minasian, and Mark H. Greene, National Cancer Institute, Rockville; Olga B. Ioffe, University of Maryland Medical Center; Brigitte M. Ronnett, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore; Chad A. Hamilton, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, MD; Marion Piedmonte, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo; Stephanie V. Blank, New York University School of Medicine; Noah D. Kauff, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; New York, NY; Linda Van Le, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC; Iouri Ivanov, Columbus Cancer Council, Columbus, OH; Maria C. Bell, Sanford University of South Dakota Medical Center, Sioux Falls, SD; Paul DiSilvestro, Women and Infants Hospital, Providence, RI; Krishnansu S. Tewari, University of California Medical Center Irvine, Orange, CA; Katie Wakeley, Tufts University; Steven J. Skates, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA; S. Diane Yamada, University of Chicago, Chicago; Gustavo Rodriguez, North Shore University Health System, Evanston, IL; David S. Alberts, University of Arizona Cancer Center, Tucson, AZ; Joan L. Walker, University of Oklahoma, Oklahoma City, OK; and Karen Lu, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Chad A Hamilton
- Mark E. Sherman, Phuong L. Mai, Lori Minasian, and Mark H. Greene, National Cancer Institute, Rockville; Olga B. Ioffe, University of Maryland Medical Center; Brigitte M. Ronnett, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore; Chad A. Hamilton, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, MD; Marion Piedmonte, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo; Stephanie V. Blank, New York University School of Medicine; Noah D. Kauff, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; New York, NY; Linda Van Le, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC; Iouri Ivanov, Columbus Cancer Council, Columbus, OH; Maria C. Bell, Sanford University of South Dakota Medical Center, Sioux Falls, SD; Paul DiSilvestro, Women and Infants Hospital, Providence, RI; Krishnansu S. Tewari, University of California Medical Center Irvine, Orange, CA; Katie Wakeley, Tufts University; Steven J. Skates, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA; S. Diane Yamada, University of Chicago, Chicago; Gustavo Rodriguez, North Shore University Health System, Evanston, IL; David S. Alberts, University of Arizona Cancer Center, Tucson, AZ; Joan L. Walker, University of Oklahoma, Oklahoma City, OK; and Karen Lu, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Krishnansu S Tewari
- Mark E. Sherman, Phuong L. Mai, Lori Minasian, and Mark H. Greene, National Cancer Institute, Rockville; Olga B. Ioffe, University of Maryland Medical Center; Brigitte M. Ronnett, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore; Chad A. Hamilton, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, MD; Marion Piedmonte, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo; Stephanie V. Blank, New York University School of Medicine; Noah D. Kauff, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; New York, NY; Linda Van Le, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC; Iouri Ivanov, Columbus Cancer Council, Columbus, OH; Maria C. Bell, Sanford University of South Dakota Medical Center, Sioux Falls, SD; Paul DiSilvestro, Women and Infants Hospital, Providence, RI; Krishnansu S. Tewari, University of California Medical Center Irvine, Orange, CA; Katie Wakeley, Tufts University; Steven J. Skates, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA; S. Diane Yamada, University of Chicago, Chicago; Gustavo Rodriguez, North Shore University Health System, Evanston, IL; David S. Alberts, University of Arizona Cancer Center, Tucson, AZ; Joan L. Walker, University of Oklahoma, Oklahoma City, OK; and Karen Lu, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Katie Wakeley
- Mark E. Sherman, Phuong L. Mai, Lori Minasian, and Mark H. Greene, National Cancer Institute, Rockville; Olga B. Ioffe, University of Maryland Medical Center; Brigitte M. Ronnett, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore; Chad A. Hamilton, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, MD; Marion Piedmonte, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo; Stephanie V. Blank, New York University School of Medicine; Noah D. Kauff, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; New York, NY; Linda Van Le, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC; Iouri Ivanov, Columbus Cancer Council, Columbus, OH; Maria C. Bell, Sanford University of South Dakota Medical Center, Sioux Falls, SD; Paul DiSilvestro, Women and Infants Hospital, Providence, RI; Krishnansu S. Tewari, University of California Medical Center Irvine, Orange, CA; Katie Wakeley, Tufts University; Steven J. Skates, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA; S. Diane Yamada, University of Chicago, Chicago; Gustavo Rodriguez, North Shore University Health System, Evanston, IL; David S. Alberts, University of Arizona Cancer Center, Tucson, AZ; Joan L. Walker, University of Oklahoma, Oklahoma City, OK; and Karen Lu, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Noah D Kauff
- Mark E. Sherman, Phuong L. Mai, Lori Minasian, and Mark H. Greene, National Cancer Institute, Rockville; Olga B. Ioffe, University of Maryland Medical Center; Brigitte M. Ronnett, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore; Chad A. Hamilton, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, MD; Marion Piedmonte, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo; Stephanie V. Blank, New York University School of Medicine; Noah D. Kauff, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; New York, NY; Linda Van Le, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC; Iouri Ivanov, Columbus Cancer Council, Columbus, OH; Maria C. Bell, Sanford University of South Dakota Medical Center, Sioux Falls, SD; Paul DiSilvestro, Women and Infants Hospital, Providence, RI; Krishnansu S. Tewari, University of California Medical Center Irvine, Orange, CA; Katie Wakeley, Tufts University; Steven J. Skates, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA; S. Diane Yamada, University of Chicago, Chicago; Gustavo Rodriguez, North Shore University Health System, Evanston, IL; David S. Alberts, University of Arizona Cancer Center, Tucson, AZ; Joan L. Walker, University of Oklahoma, Oklahoma City, OK; and Karen Lu, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - S Diane Yamada
- Mark E. Sherman, Phuong L. Mai, Lori Minasian, and Mark H. Greene, National Cancer Institute, Rockville; Olga B. Ioffe, University of Maryland Medical Center; Brigitte M. Ronnett, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore; Chad A. Hamilton, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, MD; Marion Piedmonte, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo; Stephanie V. Blank, New York University School of Medicine; Noah D. Kauff, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; New York, NY; Linda Van Le, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC; Iouri Ivanov, Columbus Cancer Council, Columbus, OH; Maria C. Bell, Sanford University of South Dakota Medical Center, Sioux Falls, SD; Paul DiSilvestro, Women and Infants Hospital, Providence, RI; Krishnansu S. Tewari, University of California Medical Center Irvine, Orange, CA; Katie Wakeley, Tufts University; Steven J. Skates, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA; S. Diane Yamada, University of Chicago, Chicago; Gustavo Rodriguez, North Shore University Health System, Evanston, IL; David S. Alberts, University of Arizona Cancer Center, Tucson, AZ; Joan L. Walker, University of Oklahoma, Oklahoma City, OK; and Karen Lu, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Gustavo Rodriguez
- Mark E. Sherman, Phuong L. Mai, Lori Minasian, and Mark H. Greene, National Cancer Institute, Rockville; Olga B. Ioffe, University of Maryland Medical Center; Brigitte M. Ronnett, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore; Chad A. Hamilton, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, MD; Marion Piedmonte, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo; Stephanie V. Blank, New York University School of Medicine; Noah D. Kauff, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; New York, NY; Linda Van Le, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC; Iouri Ivanov, Columbus Cancer Council, Columbus, OH; Maria C. Bell, Sanford University of South Dakota Medical Center, Sioux Falls, SD; Paul DiSilvestro, Women and Infants Hospital, Providence, RI; Krishnansu S. Tewari, University of California Medical Center Irvine, Orange, CA; Katie Wakeley, Tufts University; Steven J. Skates, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA; S. Diane Yamada, University of Chicago, Chicago; Gustavo Rodriguez, North Shore University Health System, Evanston, IL; David S. Alberts, University of Arizona Cancer Center, Tucson, AZ; Joan L. Walker, University of Oklahoma, Oklahoma City, OK; and Karen Lu, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Steven J Skates
- Mark E. Sherman, Phuong L. Mai, Lori Minasian, and Mark H. Greene, National Cancer Institute, Rockville; Olga B. Ioffe, University of Maryland Medical Center; Brigitte M. Ronnett, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore; Chad A. Hamilton, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, MD; Marion Piedmonte, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo; Stephanie V. Blank, New York University School of Medicine; Noah D. Kauff, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; New York, NY; Linda Van Le, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC; Iouri Ivanov, Columbus Cancer Council, Columbus, OH; Maria C. Bell, Sanford University of South Dakota Medical Center, Sioux Falls, SD; Paul DiSilvestro, Women and Infants Hospital, Providence, RI; Krishnansu S. Tewari, University of California Medical Center Irvine, Orange, CA; Katie Wakeley, Tufts University; Steven J. Skates, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA; S. Diane Yamada, University of Chicago, Chicago; Gustavo Rodriguez, North Shore University Health System, Evanston, IL; David S. Alberts, University of Arizona Cancer Center, Tucson, AZ; Joan L. Walker, University of Oklahoma, Oklahoma City, OK; and Karen Lu, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - David S Alberts
- Mark E. Sherman, Phuong L. Mai, Lori Minasian, and Mark H. Greene, National Cancer Institute, Rockville; Olga B. Ioffe, University of Maryland Medical Center; Brigitte M. Ronnett, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore; Chad A. Hamilton, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, MD; Marion Piedmonte, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo; Stephanie V. Blank, New York University School of Medicine; Noah D. Kauff, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; New York, NY; Linda Van Le, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC; Iouri Ivanov, Columbus Cancer Council, Columbus, OH; Maria C. Bell, Sanford University of South Dakota Medical Center, Sioux Falls, SD; Paul DiSilvestro, Women and Infants Hospital, Providence, RI; Krishnansu S. Tewari, University of California Medical Center Irvine, Orange, CA; Katie Wakeley, Tufts University; Steven J. Skates, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA; S. Diane Yamada, University of Chicago, Chicago; Gustavo Rodriguez, North Shore University Health System, Evanston, IL; David S. Alberts, University of Arizona Cancer Center, Tucson, AZ; Joan L. Walker, University of Oklahoma, Oklahoma City, OK; and Karen Lu, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Joan L Walker
- Mark E. Sherman, Phuong L. Mai, Lori Minasian, and Mark H. Greene, National Cancer Institute, Rockville; Olga B. Ioffe, University of Maryland Medical Center; Brigitte M. Ronnett, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore; Chad A. Hamilton, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, MD; Marion Piedmonte, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo; Stephanie V. Blank, New York University School of Medicine; Noah D. Kauff, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; New York, NY; Linda Van Le, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC; Iouri Ivanov, Columbus Cancer Council, Columbus, OH; Maria C. Bell, Sanford University of South Dakota Medical Center, Sioux Falls, SD; Paul DiSilvestro, Women and Infants Hospital, Providence, RI; Krishnansu S. Tewari, University of California Medical Center Irvine, Orange, CA; Katie Wakeley, Tufts University; Steven J. Skates, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA; S. Diane Yamada, University of Chicago, Chicago; Gustavo Rodriguez, North Shore University Health System, Evanston, IL; David S. Alberts, University of Arizona Cancer Center, Tucson, AZ; Joan L. Walker, University of Oklahoma, Oklahoma City, OK; and Karen Lu, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Lori Minasian
- Mark E. Sherman, Phuong L. Mai, Lori Minasian, and Mark H. Greene, National Cancer Institute, Rockville; Olga B. Ioffe, University of Maryland Medical Center; Brigitte M. Ronnett, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore; Chad A. Hamilton, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, MD; Marion Piedmonte, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo; Stephanie V. Blank, New York University School of Medicine; Noah D. Kauff, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; New York, NY; Linda Van Le, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC; Iouri Ivanov, Columbus Cancer Council, Columbus, OH; Maria C. Bell, Sanford University of South Dakota Medical Center, Sioux Falls, SD; Paul DiSilvestro, Women and Infants Hospital, Providence, RI; Krishnansu S. Tewari, University of California Medical Center Irvine, Orange, CA; Katie Wakeley, Tufts University; Steven J. Skates, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA; S. Diane Yamada, University of Chicago, Chicago; Gustavo Rodriguez, North Shore University Health System, Evanston, IL; David S. Alberts, University of Arizona Cancer Center, Tucson, AZ; Joan L. Walker, University of Oklahoma, Oklahoma City, OK; and Karen Lu, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Karen Lu
- Mark E. Sherman, Phuong L. Mai, Lori Minasian, and Mark H. Greene, National Cancer Institute, Rockville; Olga B. Ioffe, University of Maryland Medical Center; Brigitte M. Ronnett, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore; Chad A. Hamilton, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, MD; Marion Piedmonte, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo; Stephanie V. Blank, New York University School of Medicine; Noah D. Kauff, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; New York, NY; Linda Van Le, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC; Iouri Ivanov, Columbus Cancer Council, Columbus, OH; Maria C. Bell, Sanford University of South Dakota Medical Center, Sioux Falls, SD; Paul DiSilvestro, Women and Infants Hospital, Providence, RI; Krishnansu S. Tewari, University of California Medical Center Irvine, Orange, CA; Katie Wakeley, Tufts University; Steven J. Skates, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA; S. Diane Yamada, University of Chicago, Chicago; Gustavo Rodriguez, North Shore University Health System, Evanston, IL; David S. Alberts, University of Arizona Cancer Center, Tucson, AZ; Joan L. Walker, University of Oklahoma, Oklahoma City, OK; and Karen Lu, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Mark H Greene
- Mark E. Sherman, Phuong L. Mai, Lori Minasian, and Mark H. Greene, National Cancer Institute, Rockville; Olga B. Ioffe, University of Maryland Medical Center; Brigitte M. Ronnett, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore; Chad A. Hamilton, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, MD; Marion Piedmonte, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo; Stephanie V. Blank, New York University School of Medicine; Noah D. Kauff, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; New York, NY; Linda Van Le, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC; Iouri Ivanov, Columbus Cancer Council, Columbus, OH; Maria C. Bell, Sanford University of South Dakota Medical Center, Sioux Falls, SD; Paul DiSilvestro, Women and Infants Hospital, Providence, RI; Krishnansu S. Tewari, University of California Medical Center Irvine, Orange, CA; Katie Wakeley, Tufts University; Steven J. Skates, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA; S. Diane Yamada, University of Chicago, Chicago; Gustavo Rodriguez, North Shore University Health System, Evanston, IL; David S. Alberts, University of Arizona Cancer Center, Tucson, AZ; Joan L. Walker, University of Oklahoma, Oklahoma City, OK; and Karen Lu, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Koç N, Ayas S, Uygur L. The association of serous tubal intraepithelial carcinoma with gynecologic pathologies and its role in pelvic serous cancer. Gynecol Oncol 2014; 134:486-91. [PMID: 25038287 DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2014.07.089] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/14/2014] [Revised: 07/08/2014] [Accepted: 07/13/2014] [Indexed: 01/16/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Possible primary sites of pelvic serous cancers are, fallopian tubes, ovaries or peritoneum. Recent studies have revealed that a portion of these tumors originates from serous tubal intraepithelial carcinoma (STIC) at the distal end of fallopian tubes. In this study, the association of STIC with pelvic serous carcinomas and the pathologic parameters that indicate the tubes as the primary site were assessed. METHODS In total, 495 pairs of fallopian tubes obtained via total abdominal hysterectomy and bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy between 2011 and 2013 were examined according to SEE-FIM protocol. Hematoxylin and eosin-stained slides were examined by pathologists. Suspicious areas were immunostained with p53 and Ki-67 to diagnose STIC precisely. RESULTS Of the 495 cases, 110 cases were malignant. Among 34 cases of non-uterine serous carcinomas, 13 were diagnosed with STIC. STIC was located at the fimbrial end of the fallopian tubes in 12 cases. No STIC was identified in the gynecologic malignancies other than non-uterine serous pelvic carcinomas and benign gynecologic pathologies. Comparison of the ovarian and tubal cancer cases with and without STIC did not reveal a factor that helps to define the primary site. STIC was an important factor associated in a higher portion of the cases with bilateral ovarian cancer. CONCLUSION The role of STIC in carcinogenesis continues to be discussed as it is unknown whether STIC is the precursor lesion or just associates with the malignancies. Discovering the accurate precursor lesions and tumor carcinogenesis is essential to prevent these malignancies and to develop early diagnostic methods.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nermin Koç
- Zeynep Kamil Women and Children Diseases Research and Training Hospital, Department of Pathology, Turkey
| | - Selçuk Ayas
- Zeynep Kamil Women and Children Diseases Research and Training Hospital, Department of Gyneoncology, Turkey
| | - Lütfiye Uygur
- Zeynep Kamil Women and Children Diseases Research and Training Hospital, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Turkey.
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Genomic aberrations of BRCA1-mutated fallopian tube carcinomas. THE AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PATHOLOGY 2014; 184:1871-6. [PMID: 24726640 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajpath.2014.02.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/11/2013] [Revised: 01/20/2014] [Accepted: 02/20/2014] [Indexed: 01/30/2023]
Abstract
Intraepithelial carcinomas of the fallopian tube are putative precursors to high-grade serous carcinomas of the ovary and peritoneum. Molecular characterization of these early precursors is limited but could be the key to identifying tumor biomarkers for early detection. This study presents a genome-wide copy number analysis of occult fallopian tube carcinomas identified through risk-reducing prophylactic oophorectomy from three women with germline BRCA1 mutations, demonstrating that extensive genomic aberrations are already established at this early stage. We found no indication of a difference in the level of genomic aberration observed in fallopian tube carcinomas compared with high-grade serous ovarian carcinomas. These findings suggest that spread to the peritoneal cavity may require no or very little further tumor evolution, which raises the question of what is the real window of opportunity to detect high-grade serous peritoneal carcinoma arising from the fallopian tube before it spreads. Nonetheless, the similarity of the genomic aberrations to those observed in high-grade serous ovarian carcinomas suggests that genetic biomarkers identified in late-stage disease may be relevant for early detection.
Collapse
|
46
|
Lum D, Guido R, Rodriguez E, Lee T, Mansuria S, D'Ambrosio L, Austin RM. Brush cytology of the fallopian tube and implications in ovarian cancer screening. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2014; 21:851-6. [PMID: 24713115 DOI: 10.1016/j.jmig.2014.03.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/14/2013] [Revised: 03/04/2014] [Accepted: 03/06/2014] [Indexed: 01/17/2023]
Abstract
STUDY OBJECTIVE To determine whether fallopian tube epithelial cells adequate for cytopathology can be obtained via a minimally invasive approach using brush cytology. DESIGN Prospective feasibility study (Canadian Task Force classification II-1). SETTING Tertiary-care university-based teaching hospital. PATIENTS Ten patients who underwent laparoscopic hysterectomy, with or without adnexal surgery, because of benign indications. INTERVENTIONS Attempted hysteroscopic and laparoscopic brush cytologic sampling of the fallopian tubes. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS ThinPrep slides and cell blocks were prepared and analyzed. P53 and KI-67 immunostaining was performed on cell block specimens if adequate cellularity was present. The first 5 patients underwent attempted hysteroscopic sampling of the fallopian tube, with successful collection only in 1 patient. The protocol was then modified to enable sampling of the fallopian tube laparoscopically as well as hysteroscopically. In the other 5 patients sampling of the fallopian tubes was successful laparoscopically, including successful sampling hysteroscopically in 1 patient. The brush biopsy catheter could not be passed through the entire length of the fallopian tube in either the hysteroscopic or laparoscopic approach. All cytologic findings were interpreted as benign, although findings of nuclear overlapping, crowding, and small nucleoli were initially considered benign atypia. Immunohistochemistry for P53 and KI-67 yielded uniformly negative findings. CONCLUSION To our knowledge, this is the first study to describe endoscopic brush cytology of the fallopian tubes with correlated cytologic narrative. In the future, cytologic sampling of the fallopian tube may have implications for an ovarian cancer screening test.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Deirdre Lum
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, Magee-Womens Hospital, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh.
| | - Richard Guido
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, Magee-Womens Hospital, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh
| | - Erika Rodriguez
- Department of Pathology, Magee-Womens Hospital, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Ted Lee
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, Magee-Womens Hospital, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh
| | - Suketu Mansuria
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, Magee-Womens Hospital, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh
| | - Lori D'Ambrosio
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, Magee-Womens Hospital, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh
| | - R Marshall Austin
- Department of Pathology, Magee-Womens Hospital, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Powell CB. Risk reducing salpingo-oophorectomy for BRCA mutation carriers: Twenty years later. Gynecol Oncol 2014; 132:261-3. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2014.01.018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/01/2013] [Accepted: 07/09/2013] [Indexed: 10/25/2022]
|
48
|
George SHL, Shaw P. BRCA and Early Events in the Development of Serous Ovarian Cancer. Front Oncol 2014; 4:5. [PMID: 24478985 PMCID: PMC3901362 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2014.00005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 53] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/30/2013] [Accepted: 01/09/2014] [Indexed: 01/18/2023] Open
Abstract
Women who have an inherited mutation in the BRCA1 or BRCA2 genes have a substantial increased lifetime risk of developing epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC), and epidemiological factors related to parity, ovulation, and hormone regulation have a dramatic effect on the risk in both BRCA mutation carriers and non-carriers. The most common and most aggressive histotype of EOC, high-grade serous carcinoma (HGSC), is also the histotype associated with germline BRCA mutations. In recent years, evidence has emerged indicating that the likely tissue of origin of HGSC is the fallopian tube. We have reviewed, what is known about the fallopian tube in BRCA mutation carriers at both the transcriptional and translational aspect of their biology. We propose that changes of the transcriptome in BRCA heterozygotes reflect an altered response to the ovulatory stresses from the microenvironment, which may include the post-ovulation inflammatory response and altered reproductive hormone physiology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sophia H. L. George
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathobiology, Campbell Family Institute for Breast Cancer Research at Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Patricia Shaw
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathobiology, Campbell Family Institute for Breast Cancer Research at Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Wethington SL, Park KJ, Soslow RA, Kauff ND, Brown CL, Dao F, Otegbeye E, Sonoda Y, Abu-Rustum NR, Barakat RR, Levine DA, Gardner GJ. Clinical outcome of isolated serous tubal intraepithelial carcinomas (STIC). Int J Gynecol Cancer 2013; 23:1603-11. [PMID: 24172097 PMCID: PMC4979072 DOI: 10.1097/igc.0b013e3182a80ac8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 86] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/07/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy (RRSO) is recommended for women with BRCA mutation due to increased risk of pelvic serous carcinoma. Serous tubal intraepithelial carcinoma (STIC) is a pathologic finding of unknown clinical significance. This study evaluates the clinical outcome of patients with isolated STIC. MATERIALS/METHODS We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of consecutive patients with a germline BRCA1/2 mutation or a high-risk personal or family history of ovarian cancer who underwent RRSO between January 2006 and June 2011. All patients had peritoneal washings collected. All surgical specimens were assessed using the sectioning and extensively examining the fimbria protocol, with immunohistochemistry when indicated. p53 signature lesions and secretory cell outgrowths were excluded. RESULTS Of 593 patients who underwent RRSO, isolated STIC was diagnosed in 12 patients (2%). Five patients (42%) were BRCA1 positive, 5 patients (42%) were BRCA2 positive, and 2 patients (17%) had high-risk family history. Preoperatively, all patients with STIC had normal CA-125 levels and/or pelvic imaging results. Seven patients underwent hysterectomy and omentectomy, 6 patients (46%) had pelvic node dissections, and 5 patients (39%) had para-aortic node dissections. With the exception of positive peritoneal washings in 1 patient, no invasive or metastatic disease was identified. No patient received adjuvant chemotherapy. At median follow-up of 28 months (range, 16-44 months), no recurrences have been identified. CONCLUSIONS Among the cases of isolated STIC after RRSO reported in the literature, the yield of surgical staging is low, and short-term clinical outcomes are favorable. Peritoneal washings are the most common site of disease spread. Individualized management is warranted until additional data become available.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stephanie L. Wethington
- Department of Surgery, Gynecology Service, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Kay J. Park
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Robert A. Soslow
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Noah D. Kauff
- Department of Surgery, Gynecology Service, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
- Clinical Genetics Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
- Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY
| | - Carol L. Brown
- Department of Surgery, Gynecology Service, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
- Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY
| | - Fanny Dao
- Department of Surgery, Gynecology Service, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Ebunoluwa Otegbeye
- Clinical Genetics Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Yukio Sonoda
- Department of Surgery, Gynecology Service, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
- Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY
| | - Nadeem R. Abu-Rustum
- Department of Surgery, Gynecology Service, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
- Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY
| | - Richard R. Barakat
- Department of Surgery, Gynecology Service, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
- Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY
| | - Douglas A. Levine
- Department of Surgery, Gynecology Service, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
- Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY
| | - Ginger J. Gardner
- Department of Surgery, Gynecology Service, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
- Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Phenotypic heterogeneity of hereditary gynecologic cancers: a report from the Creighton hereditary cancer registry. Fam Cancer 2013; 12:719-40. [DOI: 10.1007/s10689-013-9651-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
|