Technical variations of the bipedicled TRAM flap in unilateral breast reconstruction: effects of conventional versus microsurgical techniques of pedicle transfer on complications rates

A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Microvascular Stacked and Conjoined-Flap Breast Reconstruction

BACKGROUND

 Stacked and conjoined (SC) flaps are a useful means of increasing flap volume in autologous breast reconstruction. The majority of studies, however, have been limited to smaller, single-center series.

METHODS

 A systematic literature review was performed to identify outcomes-based studies on microvascular SC-flap breast reconstruction. Pooled rates of flap and operative characteristics were analyzed. Meta-analytic effect size estimates were calculated for reconstructive complication rates and outcomes of studies comparing SC flaps to non-SC flaps. Meta-regression analysis identified risk factors for flap complications.

RESULTS

 Twenty-six studies were included for analysis (21 case series, five retrospective cohort studies) for a total of 869 patients, 1,003 breasts, and 2006 flaps. The majority of flaps were harvested from the bilateral abdomen (78%, 782 breasts) followed by combined abdomen-thigh stacked flaps (22.2%, 128 breasts). About 51.1% of flaps were anastomosed to anterograde/retrograde internal mammary vessels (230 breasts) and 41.8% used internal mammary/intraflap anastomoses (188 breasts). Meta-analysis revealed a rate of any flap complication of 2.3% (95% confidence interval: 1.4-3.3%), Q-statistic value p = 0.012 (I ² = 43.3%). SC flaps had a decreased risk of fat necrosis compared with non-SC flaps (odds ratio = 0.126, p < 0.0001, I ² = 0.00%), though rates of any flap and donor-site complication were similar. Age, body mass index, flap weight, and flap donor site and recipient vessels were not associated with increased risk of any flap complication.

CONCLUSION

 A global appraisal of the current evidence demonstrated the safety of SC-flap breast reconstruction with low complication rates, regardless of donor site, and lower rates of fat necrosis compared with non-SC flaps.

Comparing outcomes between stacked/conjoined and non-stacked/conjoined abdominal microvascular unilateral breast reconstruction

BACKGROUND

Stacked and conjoined free flaps are increasingly utilized in autologous breast reconstruction to augment tissue transfer volume. However, there is a paucity of comparative data on abdominally-based stacked/conjoined versus non-stacked/conjoined flaps. The purpose of this study was to compare ability to match native breast size, complications, recovery, and symmetrizing procedures between these two cohorts in unilateral breast reconstruction.

METHODS

A retrospective review of all stacked (two separate hemiabdominal)/conjoined (bipedicled full abdominal) flaps and non-stacked/conjoined (unipedicled hemiabdominal) flaps in unilateral abdominally-based autologous breast reconstructions was performed from 2011 to 2018. Variables including demographics, operative characteristics, complications, and revisions were compared in 36 stacked/conjoined patients versus 146 non-stacked/conjoined patients.

RESULTS

The stacked/conjoined cohort had more DIEP flaps (91.7 vs. 65.1%) and the non-stacked/conjoined group more MS-TRAMs (34.2 vs. 6.9%, p = .000). Additionally, non-stacked/conjoined flaps had greater utilization of combined medial and lateral row perforators (p = .000). Mean flap weight was significantly higher than mastectomy weight in stacked/conjoined flaps (+110.7 g) when compared to non-stacked/conjoined flaps (-40.2) (p = .023). Average follow-up was 54.7 ± 27.5 and 54.6 ± 29.3 months, respectively. Stacked/conjoined flaps had lower fat necrosis rates (8.3 vs. 25.4%, p = .039) and had a decreased risk of fat necrosis on multivariable regression analysis (OR 0.278, p = 0.045). There were otherwise no differences in flap, breast, or donor-site complications. Stacked/conjoined flaps also had a lower rate of contralateral breast reduction (p = .041).

CONCLUSION

Stacked/conjoined flaps were associated with a lower risk of fat necrosis compared with non-stacked/conjoined flaps and had a lower rate of contralateral symmetrizing reductions in patients undergoing unilateral abdominally-based breast reconstruction.

Decision Making in Double-Pedicled DIEP and SIEA Abdominal Free Flap Breast Reconstructions: An Algorithmic Approach and Comprehensive Classification

INTRODUCTION

The deep inferior epigastric artery perforator free flap is the gold standard for autologous breast reconstruction. However, using a single vascular pedicle may not yield sufficient tissue in patients with midline scars or insufficient lower abdominal pannus. Double-pedicled free flaps overcome this problem using different vascular arrangements to harvest the entire lower abdominal flap. The literature is, however, sparse regarding technique selection. We therefore reviewed our experience in order to formulate an algorithm and comprehensive classification for this purpose.

METHODS

All patients undergoing unilateral double-pedicled abdominal perforator free flap breast reconstruction (AFFBR) by a single surgeon (CMM) over 40 months were reviewed from a prospectively collected database.

RESULTS

Of the 112 consecutive breast free flaps performed, 25 (22%) utilised two vascular pedicles. The mean patient age was 45 years (range = 27-54). All flaps, but one (which used the thoracodorsal system), were anastomosed to the internal mammary vessels using the rib-preservation technique. The surgical duration was 656 min (range = 468-690 min). The median flap weight was 618 g (range = 432-1275 g) and the mastectomy weight was 445 g (range = 220-896 g). All flaps were successful and only three patients requested minor liposuction to reduce and reshape their reconstructed breasts.

CONCLUSION

Bipedicled free abdominal perforator flaps, employed in a fifth of all our AFFBRs, are a reliable and safe option for unilateral breast reconstruction. They, however, necessitate clear indications to justify the additional technical complexity and surgical duration. Our algorithm and comprehensive classification facilitate technique selection for the anastomotic permutations and successful execution of these operations.

LEVELS OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic level IV.

Breast reconstruction with a turbocharged transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous flap on the contralateral perforator

Seventeen patients were submitted to delayed unilateral breast reconstruction using pedicled, muscle-sparing turbocharged transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous flap based on the contralateral perforator vessels. The lateral portion of the rectus abdominis muscle on the pedicled side was preserved in 12 patients. Zones II and IV were included in the flap in all cases. Mean duration of surgery was 7 hours and 15 minutes. Four complications developed in the abdominal donor site: contralateral abdominal bulging (n=1), minor suture dehiscence (n=2), and epidermolysis at the border of the abdominal flap and umbilical scar (n=1). Three partial losses (10%-30%) occurred in the reconstructed breast (17.64% of cases), whereas 2 cases of fat necrosis were associated with partial losses. One patient developed deep vein thrombosis with pulmonary embolism; however, outcome was favorable. This proved a viable alternative for breast reconstruction, with satisfactory results in most patients and acceptable morbidity and surgical time.

Preferred use of the ipsilateral pedicled TRAM flap for immediate breast reconstruction: an illustrated approach

BACKGROUND

Recent experience with the ipsilateral TRAM flap has shown that it has the advantage of a longer functional pedicle length, which allows tension-free inset of well-vascularized tissue into the breast pocket. This leads to better positioning and shaping of the reconstructed breast with minimal disruption of the inframammary fold. The purpose of this article was to provide an illustrated approach to the ipsilateral TRAM flap and to clarify the technique when applied in the context of immediate breast reconstruction following cancer extirpation.

METHODS

A prospective evaluation of 89 patients who underwent immediate breast reconstruction following skin-sparing mastectomy for breast cancer was performed. All patients underwent ipsilateral TRAM reconstruction. The innate insetting advantage of the ipsilateral TRAM flap is illustrated in the article. The key steps of the technique were as follows: (1) The ipsilateral corner of the flap was used as the axillary tail, leaving the more bulky part to form the main body of the breast; (2) To avoid undesirable twists, a right TRAM was rotated clockwise so that its apex points superiorly; (3) This flap was subsequently tunneled into the breast pocket while preserving the inframammary fold. The opposite maneuvers were done for the left side; (4) If the flap was congested, venous augmentation was performed where the tributary of the axillary vein or the thoracodorsal vein was anastomosed with the inferior epigastric vein from the flap with an interposed vein graft (17% of cases).

RESULTS

All flaps survived and flap-related complications included partial necrosis of tissue across the midline (2.2%), palpable fat necrosis (22%), and hematoma requiring drainage (2.2%). All flaps were raised concurrent with the resection, and the combined operative time ranged from 3.5 to 6 h, with a mean hospital stay of 7 days.

CONCLUSION

The ipsilateral TRAM flap was a reliable flap with low complication rates and short surgery time. It was our preferred choice for pedicled breast reconstruction in all cases, except for the ptotic breast or if abdominal scarring excludes its use.

Stacked deep inferior epigastric perforator flap breast reconstruction: a review of 110 flaps in 55 cases over 3 years

BACKGROUND

Breast reconstruction continues to evolve. The deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap is a well-described means of providing natural tissue reconstruction with an attendant goal of minimizing damage in the abdominal donor site.

METHODS

For patients with the need for autogenous reconstruction of a single breast and insufficient abdominal fatty volume for routine DIEP flap reconstruction, the authors present an option that allows for incorporation of the entire abdominal fatty composite with sequential linkage and stacked inset of two individual abdominal flaps. The ability to take advantage of the entirety of the abdominal donor volume allows those with a relatively thin body habitus to enjoy candidacy for DIEP flap reconstruction. This sophisticated microsurgical procedure overcomes some of the limitations of other techniques with similar goals such as the bipedicled transverse rectus abdominis musculocutaneous flap by avoiding muscle sacrifice and allowing precise, independent flap inset. The authors describe their experience with this technique in 55 patients with 110 flaps over 3 years.

RESULTS

The authors' experience reviews the use of the stacked DIEP flap in a large number of patients with high success rates and superb aesthetic outcomes over a relatively short period of time. Of the 55 patients who underwent reconstruction, all enjoyed successful outcomes. Patient satisfaction was high in the studied population.

CONCLUSION

Stacked DIEP free flap breast reconstruction is a reproducible, safe, and innovative yet technically demanding solution for patients seeking autogenous breast reconstruction with otherwise inadequate abdominal fatty volume.

Erythropoietin reduces necrosis in critically ischemic myocutaneous tissue by protecting nutritive perfusion in a dose-dependent manner

BACKGROUND

Erythropoietin (Epo), the primary regulator of erythropoiesis, has recently been shown to exert antiinflammatory and antiapoptotic properties in neuronal and myocardial tissue. We herein studied whether Epo pretreatment can reduce cell death and ischemic necrosis in a chronic in vivo model.

METHODS

C57BL/6 mice were treated daily for 3 consecutive days with either 500 IU EPO/kg body weight (bw) (group Epo 500, n = 8) or 5000 IU EPO/kg bw (group Epo 5000, n = 8) administered intraperitoneally 24 hours before surgery. Thereafter, a random pattern myocutaneous flap subjected to acute persistent ischemia was elevated and fixed into a dorsal skinfold chamber. Flap elevation in animals receiving the water-soluble vitamin E analog Trolox (6-hydroxy-2, 5, 7, 8-tetramethylchroman-2-carboxylic acid) served as a nonspecific antiinflammatory agent control group (Tro); untreated control animals (Con) received saline only. Capillary perfusion, leukocyte-endothelial cell interaction, apoptotic cell death, and tissue necrosis were determined over a 10-day observation period using intravital multifluorescence microscopy.

RESULTS

Epo 5000 (44 +/- 26 cm/cm(2)) but, more noticeably, Epo 500 (116 +/- 32 cm/cm(2)) improved capillary perfusion compared with the two control groups, particularly the Con group (9 +/- 7 cm/cm(2); P < .05). The ischemia-associated leukocytic inflammation was found drastically attenuated in both Epo-pretreatment groups. Epo 500 further decreased apoptotic cell death and was effective in significantly reducing tissue necrosis (16% +/- 4% vs Tro: 48% +/- 7% and Con: 52% +/- 4%; P < .001). No angiogenic blood vessel formation could be observed in either of the Epo groups. Of interest, Epo 5000-but not Epo 500-increased systemic hematocrit.

CONCLUSION

Despite the lack of neovascularization, Epo pretreatment was capable of reducing ischemic tissue necrosis by protecting capillary perfusion, ie, nutrition of the tissue. Low-dose pretreatment was more effective, a result that was most likely due to the better perfusion conditions without an increase of the hematocrit values. Thus, low-dose Epo pretreatment might represent a promising strategy to protect critically perfused ischemic tissue.

Ischemia-induced up-regulation of heme oxygenase-1 protects from apoptotic cell death and tissue necrosis

BACKGROUND

Tissues are endowed with protective mechanisms to counteract chronic ischemia. Previous studies have demonstrated that endogenous heme oxygenase (HO)-1 may protect parenchymal tissue from inflammation- and reoxygenation-induced injury. Nothing is known, however, on whether endogenous HO-1 also plays a role in chronic ischemia to protect from development of tissue necrosis. The aim of this study is, therefore, to evaluate in vivo whether endogenous HO-1 exerts protection on chronically ischemic musculocutaneous tissue, and whether this protection is mediated by an attenuation of the microcirculatory dysfunction.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In C57BL/6-mice, a chronically ischemic flap was elevated and fixed into a dorsal skinfold chamber. In a second group, tin-protoporphyrin-IX was administrated to competitively block the action of HO-1. Animals without flap elevation served as controls. With the use of intravital fluorescence microscopy, microcirculation, apoptotic cell death, and tissue necrosis were analyzed over a 10-day observation period. The time course of HO-1 expression was determined by Western blotting.

RESULTS

Chronic ischemia induced an increase of HO-1 expression, particularly at day 1 and 3. This was associated with arteriolar dilation and hyperperfusion, which was capable of maintaining an adequate capillary perfusion density in the critically perfused central part of the flap, demarcating the distal necrosis. Inhibition of endogenous HO-1 by tin-protoporphyrin-IX completely abrogated arteriolar dilation (44.6 +/- 6.2 microm versus untreated flaps: 71.3 +/- 7.3 microm; P < 0.05) and hyperperfusion (3.13 +/- 1.29 nL/s versus 8.55 +/- 3.56 nL/s; P < 0.05). This resulted in a dramatic decrease of functional capillary density (16 +/- 16 cm/cm(2)versus 84 +/- 31 cm/cm(2); P < 0.05) and a significant increase of apoptotic cell death (585 +/- 51 cells/mm(2)versus 365 +/- 53 cells/mm(2); P < 0.05), and tissue necrosis (73% +/- 5% versus 51% +/- 5%; P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Thus, our results suggest that chronic ischemia-induced endogenous HO-1 protects ischemically endangered tissue, probably by the vasodilatory action of the HO-1-associated carbon monoxide.

The Efficacy of Bilateral Lower Abdominal Free Flaps for Unilateral Breast Reconstruction

BACKGROUND

In large-breasted women, those with midline abdominal scars, or those with scant abdominal tissue, a unipedicled lower abdominal flap may be insufficient for breast reconstruction. In these circumstances, bipedicled flaps may best satisfy the reconstructive requirements, but outcomes with bilateral free flaps for unilateral breast reconstruction are generally lacking.

METHODS

A retrospective review of patients in whom two vascular pedicles/flaps were used to simultaneously reconstruct a single breast was used to assess operative outcomes.

RESULTS

Forty patients (80 flaps) for whom two free tissue transfers were used to simultaneously reconstruct a single breast were identified. The majority of patients had a native breast cup size of C or larger. The flaps used included the superficial inferior epigastric artery (SIEA) flap (n = 29; 36 percent), the transverse rectus abdominis musculocutaneous (TRAM) flap (n = 9; 11 percent), the muscle-sparing TRAM flap (n = 15; 19 percent), and the deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap (n = 27; 34 percent). Flaps were paired in a variety of configurations, most commonly using a muscle-sparing TRAM flap in conjunction with a DIEP flap or an SIEA flap. Recipient vessels included a combination of the internal mammary and thoracodorsal vessels and the pedicles of combined flaps (turbocharged). There were no flap losses. Two flaps required reexploration for microsurgical anastomotic revision, and both were successfully salvaged. Isolated fat necrosis was encountered in only three of 80 flaps.

CONCLUSIONS

This study suggests that bilateral, bipedicled, abdominal free flaps for unilateral breast reconstruction can be used safely with a high degree of success. These combined flaps provide for enhanced vascular perfusion of the lower abdominal flap territory, allowing for harvest of larger volumes of tissue for reconstruction.

Double pedicle deep inferior epigastric perforator/muscle-sparing TRAM flaps for unilateral breast reconstruction

BACKGROUND

Utilizing both rectus abdominis muscles for unilateral breast reconstruction poses significant risks for hernia or bulge formation and decreased abdominal wall strength. We have used the fascial sparing double pedicle deep inferior epigastric artery perforator (DIEP)/DIEP or DIEP/muscle sparing TRAM (MS-TRAM) flap to overcome the disadvantages of the conventional bilateral TRAM or bilateral free TRAM flaps.

METHODS

Between January 1996 and March 2005, 14 double pedicle free DIEP/DIEP or DIEP/MS-TRAM flaps were performed in 14 patients for unilateral breast reconstruction. The abdominal wall was closed without mesh in all cases.

RESULTS

Evaluation of results was conducted through a retrospective chart review and questionnaire. The average hospital stay was 5.4 days. The follow-up period ranged from 9 months to 10 years. There was no flap loss. There were no hernias, although 1 obese patient had lower abdominal wall bulging. Questionnaire was returned by 11 out of 14 patients, with an average rating of 4.5 (1-5), with all but 1 who would recommend it to others. None of the 11 patients had postoperative abdominal pain or back pain, and 9/11 patients returned to daily activities and/or sports. All patients that worked preoperatively returned to work postoperatively.

CONCLUSIONS

Double pedicle free flaps for unilateral breast reconstruction are a safe option when autologous breast reconstruction is desired, but the volume of tissue required to build a breast exceeds the amount that could be transferred on a single pedicle flap. The double pedicle DIEP (DIEP/DIEP) and/or MS-TRAM (DIEP-MS-TRAM) flap offers good symmetric results for unilateral breast reconstruction and can minimize abdominal wall morbidity.

Aging is associated with an increased susceptibility to ischaemic necrosis due to microvascular perfusion failure but not a reduction in ischaemic tolerance

In the present study in a murine model of chronic ischaemia, we analysed: (i) whether aging was associated with an increased susceptibility to ischaemic necrosis, and (ii) whether this was based on microvascular dysfunction or reduced ischaemic tolerance. An ischaemic pedicled skin flap was created in the ear of homozygous hairless mice. The animals were assigned to three age groups, including adolescent (2±1 months), adult (10±2 months) and senescent (19±3 months). Microvascular perfusion of the ischaemic flap was assessed over 5 days by intravital microscopy, evaluating FCD (functional capillary density), capillary dilation response and the area of tissue necrosis. Expression of the stress-protein HO (haem oxygenase)-1 was determined by immunohistochemistry and Western blotting. Induction of chronic ischaemia stimulated a significant expression of HO-1 without a significant difference between the three age groups. This was associated with capillary dilation, which, however, was more pronounced in adolescent (10.5±2.8 μm compared with 3.95±0.79 μm at baseline) and adult (12.1±3.1 μm compared with 3.36±0.45 μm at baseline) animals compared with senescent animals (8.5±1.7 μm compared with 3.28±0.69 μm at baseline; P value not significant). In senescent animals, flap creation further resulted in complete cessation of capillary flow in the distal area of the flap (FCD, 0±0 cm/cm2), whereas adult (11.9±13.5 cm/cm2) and, in particular, adolescent animals (58.4±33.6 cm/cm2; P<0.05) were capable of maintaining residual capillary perfusion. The age-associated microcirculatory dysfunction resulted in a significantly increased flap necrosis of 49±8% (P<0.05) and 42±8% (P<0.05) in senescent and adult animals respectively, compared with 31±6% in adolescent mice. Of interest, functional inhibition of HO-1 by SnPP-IX (tin protoporphyrin-IX) in adolescent mice abrogated capillary dilation, decreased functional capillary density and aggravated tissue necrosis comparably with that observed in senescent mice. Thus aging is associated with an increased susceptibility to tissue necrosis, which is due to a loss of vascular reactivity to endogenous HO-1 expression, rather than a reduction in ischaemic tolerance.

Breast Reconstruction with Free Flaps from the Abdominal Donor Site—TRAM, DIEAP, and SIEA Flaps

Multiple types of free flap can be elevated from the lower abdominal region for use in breast reconstruction. These include the free transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous flap, the deep inferior epigastric artery perforator flap, and the superficial inferior epigastric artery flap. This sequence of flaps represents an evolution in the protection of the donor site. However, the decision as to which flap may be most appropriate for an individual patient is complex. This article serves to review pertinent surgical anatomy, preoperative planning, intraoperative decision making in flap elevation, and reported outcomes.

Revision in Autologous Breast Reconstruction: Principles and Approach

As breast reconstruction has an aesthetic endpoint, secondary surgical intervention is an integral part of this process. This article examines revision in autologous breast reconstruction from the perspective of clinical priority. The authors examine challenges they may be faced in autologous breast reconstructions and suggest surgical approaches toward their resolution.

Choice of flaps for breast reconstruction

The optimal method for breast reconstruction should be safe, reliable, and accessible for every patient, and it should display little or no donor-site morbidity. After comparing mammary implants it has been found that autogenous breast reconstruction can create a ptotic, soft, symmetrical breast mound. The transverse rectus abdominis musculocutaneous flap (TRAM) remains the most popular method for autogenous reconstruction. Modern trends in breast reconstruction using the TRAM flap have promoted adequate blood supply to the flap while minimizing donor-site defects in the anterior abdominal wall. The pedicled TRAM flap remains one of the most frequently used flaps, but the indirect blood supply in this flap has required many modifications and refinements. Such modifications have included the bipedicled TRAM flap, the free TRAM flap, and the supercharged TRAM flap. To avoid donor-site morbidities, the muscle-sparing free TRAM, deep inferior epigastric perforator flap (DIEP), and superficial inferior epigastric artery (SIEA) flap were introduced. The DIEP perforator flap requires meticulous technique but offers proven reliability and a low rate of complications. As surgeons become more comfortable with harvesting DIEP flaps, the frequency of usage seems likely to increase. The latissimus dorsi musculocutaneous flap, gluteus maximus musculocutaneous flap, and others may be selected when these modifications of free TRAM flap are unavailable or unusable.