Botulinum Toxin: A Treatment for Facial Asymmetry Caused by Facial Nerve Paralysis

Bacteriostatic preserved saline for pain-free periocular injections: review

We review evidence regarding the use of 0.9% benzyl alcohol in 0.9% sodium chloride solution for periocular injections (‘preserved saline’) including botulinum toxin A injections and local anaesthesia. A literature search was undertaken using search terms ‘bacteriostatic saline’, ‘benzyl-alcohol saline’, ‘benzyl alcohol sodium chloride’ and ‘preserved saline’. Bibliographies identified further sources. There have been 62 studies published on the subject of preserved-saline since 1928. Significantly lower injection-associated pain levels for periocular/facial botulinum toxin injections reconstituted with preserved-saline rather than preservative-free saline are reported by 5 studies. Significantly lower injection-associated pain with preserved-saline diluted lidocaine and epinephrine solution for eyelid anaesthesia compared with unmodified or buffered lidocaine with epinephrine, and adequate anaesthesia, was reported by one study. Thirty-one studies have explored preserved-saline for anaesthetic and seven for bacteriostatic properties, with very low infection rates after periocular botulinum toxin injections, and reduced rates of infection in indwelling catheters when preserved saline is used to flush. A meta-analysis concluded that lidocaine-containing solutions are more effective at reducing pain from insertion of intravenous catheters. Patient-perceived pain related to periorbital injections of local anaesthesia is reduced when the anaesthetic is diluted with benzyl alcohol-preserved saline compared with other dilution or buffering options. Pain is similarly reduced for periocular botulinum toxin injections reconstituted with preserved saline compared with unpreserved saline. Benzyl-alcohol preserved-saline is inexpensive but costlier than unpreserved-saline, with minimal reported complications, particularly with periocular administration, and offers the opportunity to improve the patient experience.

A Cosmetic Surgical Approach Effectively Reconstructed Facial Nerve Paralysis

In general, facial nerve palsy is treated by reconstructive surgeons, and the role of cosmetic surgeons is largely seen as secondary. The present report describes a case of refractory facial nerve palsy that arose after malignant parotid-tumor resection and high-dose radiotherapy, and that we reconstructed with a combination of cosmetic and reconstructive procedures. The procedures consisted of facelift techniques (lateral SMASectomy, creation of a nasolabial fold with three suture loops anchored at the temporal fascia, and frontal lift), a new wrinkle-removing technique wherein the frontal-muscle function was disrupted, and excision of surplus skin to rejuvenate the face. The outcomes were good, including at 1 year after surgery, and the 71-year-old patient expressed considerable satisfaction. The frontalis muscle resection effectively removed the wrinkles, helped balance the left and right sides, and permitted anti-aging surgery. This procedure has permanent effects, unlike other methods (eg, botulinum-toxin injections) that serve to weaken facial muscle function. It is notable that despite the high-dose radiotherapy the patient had received and the resulting extensive subcutaneous-tissue adhesion, our surgical protocol was relatively easy to perform as well as highly effective. Thus, even static reconstruction can give great hope and satisfaction to patients with facial nerve palsy.

AbobotulinumtoxinA: A 25-Year History

During the late 1960s and early 1970s, Alan Scott showed that intramuscular injections of botulinum toxin (BoNT) corrected nonaccommodative strabismus without resorting to surgery. The UK doctors who trained with Scott soon realized the significant potential offered by BoNT type A as a therapeutic option for several difficult-to-treat diseases. This led to a collaboration between these pioneering clinicians and the Centre for Applied Microbiology and Research at Porton Down, United Kingdom, and, in turn, to the development and commercialization of abobotulinumtoxinA as Dysport (Dystonia/Porton Down; Ipsen Biopharm Ltd., Wrexham, UK). Dysport was approved in Europe for the treatment of specific dystonias in December 1990 and now has marketing authorizations in 75 countries. Since then, the use of BoNT in therapeutic and aesthetic indications has grown year-on-year, and continues to expand well beyond Scott's initial aim. For example, ongoing trials are assessing potential new indications for BoNT-A, including acne and psoriasis. Furthermore, a growing number of other BoNT products, often termed "biosimilars," together with innovative formulations of well-established BoNT types, are likely to reach the market over the next few years. This review focuses on the history of Dysport to mark the 25th anniversary of its first launch in the United Kingdom.

Comparison of the efficacy of onabotulinumtoxinA and abobotulinumtoxinA at the 1: 3 conversion ratio for the treatment of asymmetry after long-term facial paralysis

BACKGROUND

Botulinum toxin A injection into the nonparalyzed side is used to treat asymmetry resulting from facial palsy. OnabotulinumtoxinA and abobotulinumtoxinA units are not equivalent. The authors compared the conversion ratio of 1:3 in patients with facial palsy.

METHODS

Fifty-five patients (age, 16 to 67 years; 43 women) with longstanding facial palsy were randomly treated with either onabotulinumtoxinA (n = 25) or abobotulinumtoxinA (n = 30) injections into the nonparalyzed side. Adverse effects, facial symmetry, subjective satisfaction, and Facial Disability Index were assessed after 1 and 6 months.

RESULTS

The incidence of adverse effects was higher with abobotulinumtoxinA (93.3 percent versus 64.0 percent; p = 0.007). Clinical scores of the nonparalyzed side decreased after 1 month and increased again at 6 months, with no between-group differences. Scores of the paralyzed side were lower in the onabotulinumtoxinA group before treatment, but similar in both groups thereafter. The paralyzed side scores increased after 1 month, and at 6 months were still higher than the pretreatment scores in both groups. Subjective assessment improved at all time points compared with pretreatment scores and differed between the two groups only at 1 month, when the abobotulinumtoxinA group was a bit too paralyzed. The physical function and social/well-being function subscales of the Facial Disability Index did not differ between the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Both toxins efficiently reduced asymmetry in patients with facial palsy. Adverse effects were higher with abobotulinumtoxinA at an equivalence ratio of 1:3.

CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic, II.

Botulinum neurotoxin A: a review

Despite its ubiquity in cosmetic circles and broad general awareness, a literature search of botulinum neurotoxin in JPRAS and BJPS yielded a mere 4 articles germane to cosmesis. A pair each detailing its application in masseteric hypertrophy(1,2) and the use of cryoanalgesia.(3,4) Given that botulinum neurotoxin A is the most commonly used cosmetic treatment, with American figures being most accurate,(5) a review of the background, development and scientific evidence would be perhaps useful, if not overdue, as Plastic Surgeons increasingly incorporate non-surgical interventions into their practices as part of a comprehensive facial rejuvenation strategy.

Ophthalmic Management of Facial Nerve Palsy: A Review

Facial nerve palsy affects individuals of all ages, races, and sexes. Psychological and functional implications of the paralysis present a devastating management problem to those afflicted, as well as the carriers. Since Sir Charles Bell's original description of facial palsy in 1821, our understanding and treatment options have expanded. It is essential that a multidisciplinary approach, encompassing ophthalmologists; Ear, Nose, and Throat surgeons; plastic surgeons; and psychologists work closely to optimize patient management in a staged approach. Although the etiology remains unknown, strong histological, cerebral spinal fluid, and radiological evidence suggests a possible association with herpes simplex virus in idiopathic facial nerve palsy (Bell's palsy). The use of steroids has been suggested as a means of limiting facial nerve damage in the acute phase. Unfortunately, no single randomized control trial has achieved an unquestionable benefit with the use of oral steroid therapy and thus remains controversial. In the acute phase, ophthalmologists play a pivotal role in preventing irreversible blindness from corneal exposure. This may be successfully achieved by using intensive lubrication, medical therapy (botulinum toxin), or surgery (upper lid weighting or tarsorraphy). Once the cornea is adequately protected and recovery deemed unlikely, longer term planning for eyelid and facial reanimation may take place in an individualized manner. Onset is sudden and management potentially lengthy. Physician empathy, knowledge, and experience are essential in averting long-term lifestyle and psychological discomfort for patients.