Versatility of the Bilobed Cervical Skin Flap for Total Ear Reconstruction in the Unfavorable Temporoauriculomastoid Region

Construction of a vascularized fascia-prosthesis compound model with axial pedicle for ear reconstruction surgery

Background: To design a vascular pedicled fascia-prosthesis compound model that can be used for ear reconstruction surgery. Methods: A vascularized tissue engineering chamber model was constructed in New Zealand rabbits, and fresh tissues were obtained after 4 weeks. The histomorphology and vascularization of the newly born tissue compound were analyzed and evaluated by tissue staining and Micro-CT scanning. Results: The neoplastic fibrous tissue formed in the vascularized tissue engineering chamber with the introduction of abdominal superficial vessels, similar to normal fascia, was superior to the control group in terms of vascularization, vascular density, total vascular volume, and total vascular volume/total tissue volume. Conclusion: In vivo, introducing abdominal superficial vessels in the tissue engineering chamber prepped for ear prosthesis may form a well-vascularized pedicled fascia-prosthesis compound that can be used for ear reconstruction.

Strategies of Total Auricular Reconstruction for Patients With Poor Skin Coverage at the Mastoid Area

OBJECTIVE

Burns and injuries can lead to massive defects in the mastoid tissues, which increase the difficulty of ear reconstruction. It is crucial to choose an appropriate surgical method for these patients. Here, we introduce strategies for auricular reconstruction in patients without satisfactory mastoid tissues.

METHODS

From April 2020 to July 2021, 12 men and 4 women were admitted to our institution. Twelve patients were severely burned, 3 patients experienced car accidents, and 1 patient had a tumor on his ear. The temporoparietal fascia was used for ear reconstruction in 10 cases, and the upper arm flap was used in 6 cases. All of the ear frameworks were made of costal cartilage.

RESULTS

The location, size, and shape of both sides of the auricles were generally the same. Two patients needed further surgical repair because of cartilage exposure at the helix. All of the patients were satisfied with the outcome of the reconstructed ear.

CONCLUSION

For patients with ear deformity and poor skin coverage in the mastoid area, we can choose the temporoparietal fascia if the patient's available superficial temporal artery is longer than 10 cm. If not, we can choose the upper arm flap. The latter needs a five-stage operation, which is more time consuming and difficult than the former. Moreover, the expanded upper arm flap is thinner and has better elasticity than the temporoparietal fascia, so the shape of the reconstructed ear is better. We need to evaluate the condition of the affected tissue and choose the appropriate surgical method to achieve a good result.

Clinical Outcomes of Osseointegrated Prosthetic Auricular Reconstruction in Patients With a Compromised Ipsilateral Temporoparietal Fascial Flap

Patients with major ear deformities and associated compromise of the superficial temporal artery are poor candidates for autogenous ear reconstruction because of a tenuous ipsilateral temporoparietal fascial flap (TPFF). Osseointegrated prosthetic auricular reconstruction (OPAR) is an alternative to contralateral free TPFF microsurgical and autogenous reconstruction, but data on clinical outcomes are limited. The records of patients with ear loss or major deformity and a compromised ipsilateral TPFF who underwent OPAR from 1989 to 2013 were reviewed. Satisfaction was assessed using a questionnaire based on a 5 point Likert scale. Thirty-two patients (8 women, 24 men) with mean age 43.0 years (range, 10-70 years) underwent OPAR. The ipsilateral TPFF was compromised due to major trauma (13 patients), cancer extirpation (9), burn injury (4), previous harvest (4), arteriovenous malformation (1), or infection (1). All but 2 patients had an associated craniofacial defect, such as soft tissue deformity (87.5%), hearing loss (46.9%), or bony deformity (31.3%). The overall implant success rate was 88.6% at mean follow-up time of 7.6 years post-OPAR. Prosthesis wear averaged 12.2 hours/day and 6.6 days/week (80.5 hours/week). All 5 patients who experienced implant failures had received prior head and neck irradiation. With their prosthesis, 76.2% (16 patients) stated that their self-consciousness and self-esteem were "better" or "much better," whereas 85.7% (18 patients) stated that their self-image was "better" or "much better." All patients declared that they would undergo the treatment again. Osseointegrated prosthetic auricular reconstruction is a reliable option in this challenging population with high patient satisfaction. Patients with prior radiotherapy may have a higher chance of implant failure and would benefit from extended annual follow-up.