Multisegment and halfscan reconstruction of 16-slice computed tomography for detection of coronary artery stenoses

Myocardial CT perfusion imaging for the detection of obstructive coronary artery disease: multisegment reconstruction does not improve diagnostic performance

BACKGROUND

Multisegment reconstruction (MSR) was introduced to shorten the temporal reconstruction window of computed tomography (CT) and thereby reduce motion artefacts. We investigated whether MSR of myocardial CT perfusion (CTP) can improve diagnostic performance in detecting obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD) compared with halfscan reconstruction (HSR).

METHODS

A total of 134 patients (median age 65.7 years) with clinical indication for invasive coronary angiography and without cardiac surgery prospectively underwent static CTP. In 93 patients with multisegment acquisition, we retrospectively performed both MSR and HSR and searched both reconstructions for perfusion defects. Subgroups with known (n = 68) or suspected CAD (n = 25) and high heart rate (n = 30) were analysed. The area under the curve (AUC) was compared applying DeLong approach using ≥ 50% stenosis on invasive coronary angiography as reference standard.

RESULTS

Per-patient analysis revealed the overall AUC of MSR (0.65 [95% confidence interval 0.53, 0.78]) to be inferior to that of HSR (0.79 [0.69, 0.88]; p = 0.011). AUCs of MSR and HSR were similar in all subgroups analysed (known CAD 0.62 [0.45, 0.79] versus 0.72 [0.57, 0.86]; p = 0.157; suspected CAD 0.80 [0.63, 0.97] versus 0.89 [0.77, 1.00]; p = 0.243; high heart rate 0.46 [0.19, 0.73] versus 0.55 [0.33, 0.77]; p = 0.389). Median stress radiation dose was higher for MSR than for HSR (6.67 mSv versus 3.64 mSv, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

MSR did not improve diagnostic performance of myocardial CTP imaging while increasing radiation dose compared with HSR.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

CORE320: clinicaltrials.gov NCT00934037, CARS-320: NCT00967876.

Evaluation of computed tomography in patients with atypical angina or chest pain clinically referred for invasive coronary angiography: randomised controlled trial

OBJECTIVE

 To evaluate whether invasive coronary angiography or computed tomography (CT) should be performed in patients clinically referred for coronary angiography with an intermediate probability of coronary artery disease.

DESIGN

 Prospective randomised single centre trial.

SETTING

 University hospital in Germany.

PARTICIPANTS

 340 patients with suspected coronary artery disease and a clinical indication for coronary angiography on the basis of atypical angina or chest pain.

INTERVENTIONS

 168 patients were randomised to CT and 172 to coronary angiography. After randomisation one patient declined CT and 10 patients declined coronary angiography, leaving 167 patients (88 women) and 162 patients (78 women) for analysis. Allocation could not be blinded, but blinded independent investigators assessed outcomes.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE

 The primary outcome measure was major procedural complications within 48 hours of the last procedure related to CT or angiography.

RESULTS

 Cardiac CT reduced the need for coronary angiography from 100% to 14% (95% confidence interval 9% to 20%, P<0.001) and was associated with a significantly greater diagnostic yield from coronary angiography: 75% (53% to 90%) v 15% (10% to 22%), P<0.001. Major procedural complications were uncommon (0.3%) and similar across groups. Minor procedural complications were less common in the CT group than in the coronary angiography group: 3.6% (1% to 8%) v 10.5% (6% to 16%), P=0.014. CT shortened the median length of stay in the angiography group from 52.9 hours (interquartile range 49.5-76.4 hours) to 30.0 hours (3.5-77.3 hours, P<0.001). Overall median exposure to radiation was similar between the CT and angiography groups: 5.0 mSv (interquartile range 4.2-8.7 mSv) v 6.4 mSv (3.4-10.7 mSv), P=0.45. After a median follow-up of 3.3 years, major adverse cardiovascular events had occurred in seven of 167 patients in the CT group (4.2%) and six of 162 (3.7%) in the coronary angiography group (adjusted hazard ratio 0.90, 95% confidence interval 0.30 to 2.69, P=0.86). 79% of patients stated that they would prefer CT for subsequent testing. The study was conducted at a University hospital in Germany and thus the performance of CT may be different in routine clinical practice. The prevalence was lower than expected, resulting in an underpowered study for the predefined primary outcome.

CONCLUSIONS

 CT increased the diagnostic yield and was a safe gatekeeper for coronary angiography with no increase in long term events. The length of stay was shortened by 22.9 hours with CT, and patients preferred non-invasive testing.Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00844220.

Multidetector-row computed tomography for noninvasive coronary imaging

Computed tomography (CT) permits cross-sectional imaging of the heart. Temporal and spatial resolutions of the technique have been insufficient to cover the heart without motion artefacts until the recent advent of multidetector systems with more than 16 detector rows. The modality is now suited for noninvasive imaging of the coronary arteries, producing detailed morphologic images of the entire coronary tree with upto 0.4 mm of spatial resolution, within a single short breath-hold duration. CT imaging goes beyond the delineation of the coronary lumen as provided by selective invasive angiography; the plaque burden of the coronary artery wall can be visualized directly, utilizing soft-tissue contrast and a high sensitivity even for the small calcifications that are present in hard plaque formations. Therefore, CT combines elements of catheterization angiography for lumen imaging and of intravascular ultrasound imaging for coronary wall imaging. However current CT technology is not yet able to compete with the temporal or spatial resolution of catheterization angiography nor does it provide the detailed spatial or contrast resolution of intravascular ultrasound imaging. At present, its use is therefore restricted to complementing the invasive modalities in appropriate indications. Although CT entails significantly less risk than the invasive procedures, the risks of radiation dose exposure and contrast agent application are not negligible. In the foreseeable future, if the current rate of technological advancement continues, CT may replace the invasive modalities in routine care for diagnostic purposes.

Noninvasive coronary angiography using computed tomography

While noninvasive imaging of the coronary lumen remains challenging, great strides have been made with computed tomography. Two variations of computed tomography are used in the study of the coronary tree: multislice or multidetector computed tomography and electron-beam computed tomography. Both have high spatial and temporal resolutions as well as excellent signal-to-noise ratios, which allows major branches of the coronary tree to be depicted. Impaired image quality, due to dense calcifications and multiple image artifacts including coronary artery motion and breathing artifacts, limits the clinical utility of noninvasive coronary angiography. Early studies with electron-beam angiography demonstrated an overall sensitivity of 85% and specificity of 89% for the detection of obstructive coronary artery disease. With early diastolic imaging, the sensitivity and specificity increases to 92 and 93%, respectively (rather than 80% of the cardiac interbeat interval, where coronary motion is more pronounced). Multidetector computed tomography, with improved spatial resolution but decreased temporal resolution, produces results that vary depending on the equipment. Four-slice scanners have an average sensitivity of only 61%, and only 38% of patients have all four vessels or 15 segments available for analysis, due to both cardiac motion and calcification. Thinner slice collimation with eight and 16 slices have allowed for improved detection. Sensitivity and specificity improve to 80 and 86%, respectively. Furthermore, the number of assessable segments with eight-to 16-slice scanners improves significantly, compared with four-slice scanners (85 vs. 73%; p<0.001). If only assessable segments are included in analysis, sensitivity and specificity for multidetector-row computed tomography improves to nearly 90%. Compared with magnetic resonance imaging, with a reported accuracy of 72% in the only multicenter study, computed tomography has great promise to become the primary method of noninvasive coronary angiography.

Coronary artery stenoses: accuracy of 64-detector row CT angiography in segments with mild, moderate, or severe calcification--a subanalysis of the CORE-64 trial

PURPOSE

To evaluate the influence of cross-sectional arc calcification on the diagnostic accuracy of computed tomography (CT) angiography compared with conventional coronary angiography for the detection of obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Institutional Review Board approval and written informed consent were obtained from all centers and participants for this HIPAA-compliant study. Overall, 4511 segments from 371 symptomatic patients (279 men, 92 women; median age, 61 years [interquartile range, 53-67 years]) with clinical suspicion of CAD from the CORE-64 multicenter study were included in the analysis. Two independent blinded observers evaluated the percentage of diameter stenosis and the circumferential extent of calcium (arc calcium). The accuracy of quantitative multidetector CT angiography to depict substantial (≥ 50%) stenoses was assessed by using quantitative coronary angiography (QCA). Cross-sectional arc calcium was rated on a segment level as follows: noncalcified or mild (< 90°), moderate (90°-180°), or severe (> 180°) calcification. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression, receiver operation characteristic curve, and clustering methods were used for statistical analyses.

RESULTS

A total of 1099 segments had mild calcification, 503 had moderate calcification, 338 had severe calcification, and 2571 segments were noncalcified. Calcified segments were highly associated (P < .001) with disagreement between CTA and QCA in multivariable analysis after controlling for sex, age, heart rate, and image quality. The prevalence of CAD was 5.4% in noncalcified segments, 15.0% in mildly calcified segments, 27.0% in moderately calcified segments, and 43.0% in severely calcified segments. A significant difference was found in area under the receiver operating characteristic curves (noncalcified: 0.86, mildly calcified: 0.85, moderately calcified: 0.82, severely calcified: 0.81; P < .05).

CONCLUSION

In a symptomatic patient population, segment-based coronary artery calcification significantly decreased agreement between multidetector CT angiography and QCA to detect a coronary stenosis of at least 50%.

Limited clinical utility of CT coronary angiography in a district hospital setting

BACKGROUND

Studies have demonstrated considerable accuracy of multi-slice CT coronary angiography (MSCT-CA) in comparison to invasive coronary angiography (I-CA) for evaluating coronary artery disease (CAD). The extent to which published MSCT-CA accuracy parameters are transferable to routine practice beyond high-volume tertiary centres is unknown.

AIM

To determine the accuracy of MSCT-CA for the detection of CAD in a Scottish district general hospital.

DESIGN

Prospective study of diagnostic accuracy.

METHOD

One hundred patients with suspected CAD recruited from two Glasgow hospitals underwent both MSCT-CA (Philips Brilliance 40 × 0.625 collimation, 50-200 ms temporal resolution) and I-CA. Studies were reported by independent, blinded radiologists and cardiologists and compared using the AHA 15-segment model.

RESULTS

Of 100 patients [55 male, 45 female, mean (SD) age 58.0 (10.7) years], 59 and 41% had low-intermediate and high pre-test probabilities of significant CAD, respectively. Mean (SD) heart rate during MSCT-CA was 68.8 (9.0) bpm. Fifty-seven per cent of patients had coronary artery calcification and 35% were obese. Patient prevalence of CAD was 38%. Per-patient sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative (NPV) predictive values for MSCT-CA were 92.1, 47.5, 52.2 and 90.6%, respectively. NPV was reduced to 75.0% in the high pre-test probability group. Specificity was compromised in patients with sub-optimally controlled heart rates, calcified arteries and elevated BMI.

CONCLUSION

Forty-Slice MSCT-CA has a high NPV for ruling out significant CAD when performed in a district hospital setting in patients with low-intermediate pre-test probability and minimal arterial calcification. Specificity is compromised by clinically appropriate strategies for dealing with unevaluable studies. Effective heart rate control during MSCT-CA is imperative. National guidelines should be utilized to govern patient selection and direct MSCT-CA reporter training to ensure quality control.

Coronary computed tomography angiography using prospective electrocardiography-gated axial scans with 64-detector computed tomography: evaluation of stair-step artifacts and padding time

PURPOSE

We compared stair-step artifacts and radiation dose between prospective electrocardiography (ECG)-gated coronary computed tomography angiography (prospective CCTA) and retrospective CCTA using 64-detector CT and determined the optimal padding time (PT) for prospective CCTA.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively evaluated 183 patients [mean heart rate (HR) <65 beats/min, maximum HR instability <5 beats/min] who had undergone CCTA. We scored stair-step artifacts from 1 (severe) to 5 (none) and evaluated the effective dose in 53 patients with retrospective CCTA and 130 with prospective CCTA (PT 200 ms, n = 32; PT 50 ms, n = 98).

RESULTS

Mean artifact scores were 4.3 in both retrospective and prospective CCTAs. However, statistically more arteries scored <3 (nonassessable) on prospective CCTA (P < 0.001). Mean scores for prospective CCTA with 200- and 50-ms PT were 4.1 and 4.3, respectively (no significant difference). The radiation dose of prospective CCTA was reduced by 59.1% to 80.7%.

CONCLUSION

Prospective CCTA reduces the radiation dose and allows diagnostic imaging in most cases but shows more nonevaluable artifacts than retrospective CCTA. Use of 50-ms instead of 200-ms PT appears to maintain image quality in patients with a mean HR < 65 beats/min and HR instability of <5 beats/min.

CT angiography: current technology and clinical use

Since 1958, catheter angiography has assumed the role of gold standard for vascular imaging, despite the invasive nature of the procedure. Less invasive techniques for vascular imaging, such as computed tomographic angiography (CTA), have been developed and have matured in conjunction with developments in catheter arteriography. In a few cases, such as imaging, the aorta and the pulmonary arteries, CTA has supplanted catheter angiography as the gold standard. The expanding role of CTA emphasizes the need for deep, broad-based understanding of physical principles. This review describes CT hardware and associated software for angiography. The fundamentals of CTA physics are complemented with several clinical examples.

Patient characteristics as predictors of image quality and diagnostic accuracy of MDCT compared with conventional coronary angiography for detecting coronary artery stenoses: CORE-64 Multicenter International Trial

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of the study was to investigate patient characteristics associated with image quality and their impact on the diagnostic accuracy of MDCT for the detection of coronary artery stenosis.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Two hundred ninety-one patients with a coronary artery calcification (CAC) score of <or=600 Agatston units (214 men and 77 women; mean age, 59.3+/-10.0 years [SD]) were analyzed. An overall image quality score was derived using an ordinal scale. The accuracy of quantitative MDCT to detect significant (>or=50%) stenoses was assessed using quantitative coronary angiography (QCA) per patient and per vessel using a modified 19-segment model. The effect of CAC, obesity, heart rate, and heart rate variability on image quality and accuracy were evaluated by multiple logistic regression. Image quality and accuracy were further analyzed in subgroups of significant predictor variables. Diagnostic analysis was determined for image quality strata using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves.

RESULTS

Increasing body mass index (BMI) (odds ratio [OR]=0.89, p<0.001), increasing heart rate (OR=0.90, p<0.001), and the presence of breathing artifact (OR=4.97, p<or=0.001) were associated with poorer image quality whereas sex, CAC score, and heart rate variability were not. Compared with examinations of white patients, studies of black patients had significantly poorer image quality (OR=0.58, p=0.04). At a vessel level, CAC score (10 Agatston units) (OR=1.03, p=0.012) and patient age (OR=1.02, p=0.04) were significantly associated with the diagnostic accuracy of quantitative MDCT compared with QCA. A trend was observed in differences in the areas under the ROC curves across image quality strata at the vessel level (p=0.08).

CONCLUSION

Image quality is significantly associated with patient ethnicity, BMI, mean scan heart rate, and the presence of breathing artifact but not with CAC score at a patient level. At a vessel level, CAC score and age were associated with reduced diagnostic accuracy.

Planimetry of the aortic valve orifice area: comparison of multislice spiral computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging

OBJECTIVE

We sought to determine the comparability of multislice computed tomography (MSCT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for measuring the aortic valve orifice area (AVA) and grading aortic valve stenosis.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Twenty-seven individuals, among them 18 patients with valvular stenosis, underwent AVA planimetry by both MSCT and MRI. In the subset of patients with valvular stenosis, AVA was also calculated from transthoracic Doppler echocardiography (TTE) using the continuity equation.

RESULTS

There was excellent correlation between MSCT and MRI (r = 0.99) and limits of agreement were in an acceptable range (± 0.42 cm(2)) although MSCT yielded a slightly smaller mean AVA than MRI (1.57 ± 0.83 cm(2) vs. 1.67 ± 0.98 cm(2), p < 0.05). However, in the subset of patients with valvular stenosis, the mean AVA was not different between MSCT and MRI (1.05 ± 0.30 cm(2) vs. 1.04 ± 0.39 cm(2); p > 0.05). The mean AVAs on both MSCT and MRI were systematically larger than on TTE (0.88 ± 0.28 cm(2), p < 0.001 each). Using an AVA of 1.0 cm(2) on TTE as reference, the best threshold for detecting severe-to-critical stenosis on MSCT and MRI was an AVA of 1.25 cm(2) and 1.30 cm(2), respectively, resulting in an accuracy of 96% each.

CONCLUSION

Our study specifies recent reports on the suitability of MSCT for quantifying AVA. The data presented here suggest that certain methodical discrepancies of AVA measurements exist between MSCT, MRI and TTE. However, MSCT and MRI have shown excellent correlation in AVA planimetry and similar accuracy in grading aortic valve stenosis.

Noninvasive coronary angiography by 320-row computed tomography with lower radiation exposure and maintained diagnostic accuracy: comparison of results with cardiac catheterization in a head-to-head pilot investigation

BACKGROUND

Noninvasive coronary angiography with the use of multislice computed tomography (CT) scanners is feasible with high sensitivity and negative predictive value; however, the radiation exposure associated with this technique is rather high. We evaluated coronary angiography using whole-heart 320-row CT, which avoids exposure-intensive overscanning and overranging.

METHODS AND RESULTS

A total of 30 consecutive patients with suspected coronary artery disease referred for clinically indicated conventional coronary angiography (CCA) were included in this prospective intention-to-diagnose study. CT was performed with the use of up to 320 simultaneous detector rows before same-day CCA, which, together with quantitative analysis, served as the reference standard. The per-patient sensitivity and specificity for CT compared with CCA were 100% (95% confidence interval [CI], 72 to 100) and 94% (95% CI, 73 to 100), respectively. Per-vessel versus per-segment sensitivity and specificity were 89% (95% CI, 62 to 98) and 96% (95% CI, 90 to 99) versus 78% (95% CI, 56 to 91) and 98% (95% CI, 96 to 99), respectively. Interobserver agreement between the 2 readers was significantly better for CCA (97% of 121 coronary arteries) than for CT (90%; P=0.04). Percent diameter stenosis determined with the use of CT showed good correlation with CCA (P<0.001, R=0.81) without significant underestimation or overestimation (-3.1+/-24.4%; P=0.08). Intraindividual comparison of CT with CCA revealed a significantly smaller effective radiation dose (median, 4.2 versus 8.5 mSv; P<0.05) and amount of contrast agent required (median, 80 versus 111 mL; P<0.001) for 320-row CT. The majority of patients (87%) indicated that they would prefer CT over CCA for future diagnostic imaging (P<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

CT with the use of emerging technology has the potential to significantly reduce the radiation dose and amount of contrast agent required compared with CCA while maintaining high diagnostic accuracy.

Characterization of peri-infarct zone heterogeneity by contrast-enhanced multidetector computed tomography: a comparison with magnetic resonance imaging

OBJECTIVES

This study examined whether multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) improves the ability to define peri-infarct zone (PIZ) heterogeneity relative to magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).

BACKGROUND

The PIZ as characterized by delayed contrast-enhancement (DE)-MRI identifies patients susceptible to ventricular arrhythmias and predicts outcome after myocardial infarction (MI).

METHODS

Fifteen mini-pigs underwent coronary artery occlusion followed by reperfusion. Both MDCT and MRI were performed on the same day approximately 6 months after MI induction, followed by animal euthanization and ex vivo MRI (n = 5). Signal density threshold algorithms were applied to MRI and MDCT datasets reconstructed at various slice thicknesses (1 to 8 mm) to define the PIZ and to quantify partial volume effects.

RESULTS

The DE-MDCT reconstructed at 8-mm slice thickness showed excellent correlation of infarct size with post-mortem pathology (r2 = 0.97; p < 0.0001) and MRI (r2 = 0.92; p < 0.0001). The DE-MDCT and -MRI were able to detect a PIZ in all animals, which correlates to a mixture of viable and nonviable myocytes at the PIZ by histology. The ex vivo DE-MRI PIZ volume decreased with slice thickness from 0.9 +/- 0.2 ml at 8 mm to 0.2 +/- 0.1 ml at 1 mm (p = 0.01). The PIZ volume/mass by DE-MDCT increased with decreasing slice thickness because of declining partial volume averaging in the PIZ, but was susceptible to increased image noise.

CONCLUSIONS

A DE-MDCT provides a more detailed assessment of the PIZ in chronic MI and is less susceptible to partial volume effects than MRI. This increased resolution best reflects the extent of tissue mixture by histopathology and has the potential to further enhance the ability to define the substrate of malignant arrhythmia in ischemic heart disease noninvasively.

Comparison between the image quality of multisegment and halfscan reconstructions of non-invasive CT coronary angiography

The purpose of this study was to compare the image quality of multisegment and halfscan reconstructions of multislice computed tomography (MSCT) coronary angiography. 126 patients with suspected coronary artery disease and uninfluenced heart rates were examined by 16-slice CT before they underwent invasive coronary angiography. Multisegment and halfscan reconstructions were performed in all patients, and subjective image quality, overall vessel length, vessel length free of motion artefacts and contrast-to-noise ratios (CNRs) were compared for both techniques. The diagnostic accuracy of both approaches was compared with the results of invasive coronary angiography. Overall image quality scores of multisegment reconstruction were superior to those of halfscan reconstruction (13.3+/-2.1 vs 11.9+/-2.9; p<0.001). Multisegment reconstruction depicted significantly longer overall coronary vessel lengths (p<0.001) and larger vessel proportions free of motion artefacts in three of the four main coronary arteries. CNRs in the left main, left anterior descending and left circumflex coronary arteries were significantly higher when multisegment reconstruction was used (p<0.001). Overall accuracy was higher for multisegment reconstruction compared with halfscan reconstruction (87% vs 62%). In conclusion, multisegment reconstruction significantly improves image quality and diagnostic accuracy of MSCT coronary angiography compared with standard halfscan reconstruction, resulting in vessel lengths depicted free of motion comparable to those of CT performed in patients given beta-blockers to lower heart rates.

Randomized comparison of 64-slice single- and dual-source computed tomography coronary angiography for the detection of coronary artery disease

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study was to analyze the influence of a systematic approach to lower heart rate for coronary computed tomography (CT) angiography on diagnostic accuracy of 64-slice single- and dual-source CT.

BACKGROUND

Coronary CT angiography is often impaired by motion artifacts, so that routine lowering of heart rate is usually recommended. This is often conceived as a major limitation of the technique. It is expected that higher temporal resolution, such as with dual-source 64-slice CT, would allow diagnostic imaging even without systematic pre-treatment for lowering the heart rate.

METHODS

Two hundred patients with suspected coronary artery disease were first randomized to either 64-slice single-source CT (n = 100) or dual-source CT (n = 100) for contrast-enhanced coronary artery evaluation. In each group, patients were further randomized to either receive systematic heart rate control (oral and intravenous beta-blockade for a target heart rate < or =60 beats/min) or receive no premedication. Evaluability of datasets and diagnostic accuracy were compared between groups against the results obtained from invasive angiography.

RESULTS

Systematic pre-treatment lowered heart rate during CT coronary angiography by 10 beats/min. Heart rate control significantly improved evaluability in single-source CT (93% vs. 69% on a per-patient basis, p = 0.005), whereas it did not in dual-source CT (96% vs. 98%). In evaluable patients, sensitivity to detect the presence of at least 1 coronary stenosis by single-source CT was 86% and 79%, respectively, with and without heart rate control (p = NS). For dual-source CT, it was 100% and 95%, respectively (p = NS). The rate of correctly classified patients, defined as evaluable and correct classification as to the presence or absence of at least 1 coronary artery stenosis, was significantly improved by heart rate control in single-source CT (78% vs. 57%, p = 0.04), whereas there was no such influence in dual-source CT (87% vs. 93%).

CONCLUSIONS

Systematic heart rate control significantly improves image quality for coronary visualization by 64-slice single-source CT, whereas image quality and diagnostic accuracy remain unaffected in dual-source CT angiography. Improved temporal resolution obviates the need for heart rate control.

The influence of reconstruction algorithm and heart rate on coronary artery image quality and stenosis detection at 64-detector cardiac CT

Objective

We wanted to evaluate the impact of two reconstruction algorithms (halfscan and multisector) on the image quality and the accuracy of measuring the severity of coronary stenoses by using a pulsating cardiac phantom with different heart rates (HRs).

Materials and Methods

Simulated coronary arteries with different stenotic severities (25, 50, 75%) and different luminal diameters (3, 4, 5 mm) were scanned with a fixed pitch of 0.16 and a 0.35 second gantry rotation time on a 64-slice multidetector CT. Both reconstruction algorithms (halfscan and multisector) were applied to HRs of 40-120 beats per minute (bpm) at 10 bpm intervals. Three experienced radiologists visually assessed the image quality and they manually measured the stenotic severity.

Results

Fewer measurement errors occurred with multisector reconstruction (p = 0.05), a slower HR (p < 0.001) and a larger luminal diameter (p = 0.014); measurement errors were not related with the observers or the stenotic severity. There was no significant difference in measurements as for the reconstruction algorithms below an HR of 70 bpm. More nonassessable segments were visualized with halfscan reconstruction (p = 0.004) and higher HRs (p < 0.001). Halfscan reconstruction had better quality scores when the HR was below 60 bpm, while multisector reconstruction had better quality scores when the HR was above 90 bpm. For the HRs between 60 and 90 bpm, both reconstruction modes had similar quality scores. With excluding the nonassessable segments, both reconstruction algorithms achieved a similar mean measured stenotic severity and similar standard deviations.

Conclusion

At a higher HR (above 90 bpm), multisector reconstruction had better temporal resolution, fewer nonassessable segments, better quality scores and better accuracy of measuring the stenotic severity in this phantom study.

Determining optimal acquisition parameters for computed tomography coronary angiography: evaluation of a software-assisted, breathhold exam simulation

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES

Scanning parameters used in multislice computed tomographic (MSCT) coronary angiography should be adapted to patients' heart rates. The aim of this study was to evaluate the rate of success of a software-assisted scan simulation to determine optimal gantry rotation time prior to MSCT coronary angiography.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Data from 218 64-slice MSCT coronary angiographic studies were retrospectively analyzed. Prior to the MSCT examination, a scan had been simulated by giving a breath-hold command, after which a software program recorded the patient's heart rate from an electrocardiogram over the expected scanning time and predicted optimal scanning parameters. The success rate in predicting optimal parameters for the subsequent MSCT examination and the resulting acquisition window width were analyzed.

RESULTS

There was a wide range of heart rates among the patients. The mean intraindividual variation during scan simulation and examination was 4.8 beats/min. Optimal scan parameters were selected in 179 of 218 cases (82%). The median acquisition window width achieved in this group was 174 ms (range, 100-200), compared with 192 ms (range, 149-225) in cases in which suboptimal settings were selected (P < .001). Correct prediction occurred significantly more often in patients with low heart rates (<66 beats/min) than in those with higher heart rates (>or=66 beats/min) (93% vs 66%; P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

The software-assisted scan simulation was a fast and simple procedure that allowed the selection of optimal computed tomographic parameters in >80% of patients. The procedure may be a useful adjunct to avoid unwanted synchronicity of gantry rotation and heart cycle and optimize temporal resolution in MSCT coronary angiography.

Imaging of the heart with computed tomography

Imaging of the heart with computed tomography (CT) was already introduced in the 1980Is and has meanwhile entered clinical routine as a consequence of the rapid evolution of CT technology during the last decade. In this review article, we give an overview on the technology and clinical performance of different CT-scanner generations used for cardiac imaging, such as Electron Beam CT (EBCT), single-slice CT und multi-detector row CT (MDCT) with 4, 16 and 64 simultaneously acquired slices. We identify the limitations of current CT-scanners, indicate potential of improvement and discuss alternative system concepts such as CT with area detectors and dual source CT (DSCT).

Diagnostic performance of coronary angiography by 64-row CT

BACKGROUND

The accuracy of multidetector computed tomographic (CT) angiography involving 64 detectors has not been well established.

METHODS

We conducted a multicenter study to examine the accuracy of 64-row, 0.5-mm multidetector CT angiography as compared with conventional coronary angiography in patients with suspected coronary artery disease. Nine centers enrolled patients who underwent calcium scoring and multidetector CT angiography before conventional coronary angiography. In 291 patients with calcium scores of 600 or less, segments 1.5 mm or more in diameter were analyzed by means of CT and conventional angiography at independent core laboratories. Stenoses of 50% or more were considered obstructive. The area under the receiver-operating-characteristic curve (AUC) was used to evaluate diagnostic accuracy relative to that of conventional angiography and subsequent revascularization status, whereas disease severity was assessed with the use of the modified Duke Coronary Artery Disease Index.

RESULTS

A total of 56% of patients had obstructive coronary artery disease. The patient-based diagnostic accuracy of quantitative CT angiography for detecting or ruling out stenoses of 50% or more according to conventional angiography revealed an AUC of 0.93 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.90 to 0.96), with a sensitivity of 85% (95% CI, 79 to 90), a specificity of 90% (95% CI, 83 to 94), a positive predictive value of 91% (95% CI, 86 to 95), and a negative predictive value of 83% (95% CI, 75 to 89). CT angiography was similar to conventional angiography in its ability to identify patients who subsequently underwent revascularization: the AUC was 0.84 (95% CI, 0.79 to 0.88) for multidetector CT angiography and 0.82 (95% CI, 0.77 to 0.86) for conventional angiography. A per-vessel analysis of 866 vessels yielded an AUC of 0.91 (95% CI, 0.88 to 0.93). Disease severity ascertained by CT and conventional angiography was well correlated (r=0.81; 95% CI, 0.76 to 0.84). Two patients had important reactions to contrast medium after CT angiography.

CONCLUSIONS

Multidetector CT angiography accurately identifies the presence and severity of obstructive coronary artery disease and subsequent revascularization in symptomatic patients. The negative and positive predictive values indicate that multidetector CT angiography cannot replace conventional coronary angiography at present. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00738218.)

Coronary CT angiography using 64 detector rows: methods and design of the multi-centre trial CORE-64

Multislice computed tomography (MSCT) for the noninvasive detection of coronary artery stenoses is a promising candidate for widespread clinical application because of its non-invasive nature and high sensitivity and negative predictive value as found in several previous studies using 16 to 64 simultaneous detector rows. A multi-centre study of CT coronary angiography using 16 simultaneous detector rows has shown that 16-slice CT is limited by a high number of nondiagnostic cases and a high false-positive rate. A recent meta-analysis indicated a significant interaction between the size of the study sample and the diagnostic odds ratios suggestive of small study bias, highlighting the importance of evaluating MSCT using 64 simultaneous detector rows in a multi-centre approach with a larger sample size. In this manuscript we detail the objectives and methods of the prospective "CORE-64" trial ("Coronary Evaluation Using Multidetector Spiral Computed Tomography Angiography using 64 Detectors"). This multi-centre trial was unique in that it assessed the diagnostic performance of 64-slice CT coronary angiography in nine centres worldwide in comparison to conventional coronary angiography. In conclusion, the multi-centre, multi-institutional and multi-continental trial CORE-64 has great potential to ultimately assess the per-patient diagnostic performance of coronary CT angiography using 64 simultaneous detector rows.

Prevalence of obstructive coronary artery disease in an outpatient cardiac CT angiography environment

PURPOSE

To determine the prevalence of significant obstructive disease and non-diagnostic studies using coronary computed tomographic angiography (CTA) in an outpatient environment, to establish if CTA could help avoid unnecessary diagnostic cardiac catheterizations.

METHODS

We evaluated all cases consecutively performed in our outpatient CTA laboratory seen over one year with an indication that could warrant a cardiac catheterization to establish the presence or absence of coronary artery disease (CAD). Excluded were patients without established indications for cardiac catheterization and those with known CAD (i.e.- prior myocardial infarction, revascularization). Four hundred and ninety-three (493) CTA case studies were included for the analysis. Patients were classified as normal (no luminal irregularities seen), non-obstructive coronary disease (<50% stenosis), significant obstructive coronary disease (>50% stenosis), or a non-diagnostic study. We assumed that all patients assigned to the obstructive CAD group and the non-diagnostic study group would require a cardiac catheterization. In the remaining two groups, a cardiac catheterization would not be necessary for diagnosis or treatment.

RESULTS

Of the 493 index cases evaluated, 157 (32%) cases were reported to be normal, 204 patients were classified as having non-obstructive disease (41%), 93 patients were defined to have obstructive CAD (19%), and 39 cases were inconclusive (8%). Thus, in 27% of the study population, a conventional coronary angiography would be indicated to clarify the diagnosis or provide definitive disease severity for subsequent revascularization.

CONCLUSION

Among ambulatory patients referred for CT angiography with symptoms or positive (or equivocal) cardiac stress tests, 73% of patients were found to have either normal coronary arteries or non-obstructive disease. Given the high negative predictive power of cardiac CTA (93-99%), these patients most likely would not require subsequent invasive coronary angiography. A strategy of selective cardiac catheterization may substantially decrease unnecessary diagnostic cardiac catheterizations and reduce health care expenses.

Evaluation of right ventricular function with multidetector computed tomography: comparison with magnetic resonance imaging and analysis of inter- and intraobserver variability

This study was performed to prospectively compare multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) with 16 simultaneous sections and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for the assessment of global right ventricular function in 50 patients. MDCT using a semiautomatic analysis tool showed good correlation with MRI for end-diastolic volume (EDV, r=0.83, p<0.001), end-systolic volume (ESV, r=0.86, p<0.001) and stroke volume (SV, r=0.74, p<0.001), but only a moderate correlation for the ejection fraction (EF, r=0.67, p<0.001). Bland Altman analysis revealed a slight, but insignificant overestimation of EDV (4.0 ml, p=0.08) and ESV (2.4 ml, p=0.07), and underestimation of EF (0.1%, p=0.92) with MDCT compared with MRI. All limits of agreement between both modalities (EF: +/-15.7%, EDV: +/-31.0 ml, ESV: +/-18.0 ml) were in a moderate but acceptable range. Interobserver variability of MDCT was not significantly different from that of MRI. For MDCT software, the post-processing time was significantly longer (19.6+/-5.8 min) than for MRI (11.8+/-2.6 min, p<0.001). Accurate assessment of right ventricular volumes by 16-detector CT is feasible but still rather time-consuming.

Is there a gender difference in noninvasive coronary imaging? Multislice computed tomography for noninvasive detection of coronary stenoses

BACKGROUND

Multislice computed tomography (MSCT) coronary angiography is the foremost alternative to invasive coronary angiography.

METHODS

We sought to compare the diagnostic accuracy of MSCT in female and male patients with suspected coronary disease. Altogether 50 women and 95 men underwent MSCT with 0.5 mm detector collimation. Coronary artery stenoses of at least 50% on conventional coronary angiography were considered significant.

RESULTS

The coronary vessel diameters of all four main coronary artery branches were significantly larger in men than in women. The diagnostic accuracy of MSCT in identifying patients with coronary artery disease was significantly lower for women (72%) compared with men (89%, p < 0.05). Also sensitivity (70% vs. 95%), positive predictive value (64% vs. 93%), and the rate of nondiagnostic examinations (14% vs. 4%, all: p < 0.05) were significantly worse for women. The effective radiation dose of MSCT coronary angiography was significantly higher in the examination of women (13.7 +/- 1.2 mSv) than of men (11.7 +/- 0.9 mSv, p < 0.001), mainly as a result of the fact that the radiosensitive female breast (contributing 24.5% of the dose in women) is in the x-ray path.

CONCLUSION

Noninvasive coronary angiography with MSCT might be less accurate and sensitive for women than men. Also, women are exposed to a significantly higher effective radiation dose than men.

Four-dimensional computed tomographic imaging in the wrist: proof of feasibility in a cadaveric model

OBJECTIVE

High-resolution real-time three-dimensional (3D) imaging of the moving wrist may provide novel insights into the pathophysiology of joint instability. The purpose of this work was to assess the feasibility of using retrospectively gated spiral computed tomography (CT) to perform four-dimensional (4D) imaging of the moving wrist joint.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A cadaver forearm from below the elbow was mounted on a motion simulator which performed radioulnar deviation of the wrist at 30 cycles per minute. An electronic trigger from the simulator provided the "electrocardiogram" (ECG) signal required for gated reconstructions. Four-dimensional and 3D images were compared by a blinded observer for image quality and presence of artifacts.

RESULTS

Image quality of 4D images was found to be excellent at the extremes of radial and ulnar deviation (end-motion phases). Some artifacts were seen in mid-motion phases.

CONCLUSION

4D CT musculoskeletal imaging is feasible. Four-dimensional CT may allow clinicians to assess functional (dynamic) instabilities of the wrist joint.

Influence of heart rate on diagnostic accuracy and image quality of 16-slice CT coronary angiography: comparison of multisegment and halfscan reconstruction approaches

The lower the heart rate the better image quality in multislice computed tomography (MSCT) coronary angiography. We prospectively assessed the influence of heart rate on per-patient diagnostic accuracy and image quality of MSCT coronary angiography and compared adaptive multisegment and standard halfscan reconstruction. A consecutive cohort of 126 patients scheduled to undergo conventional coronary angiography was examined with 16-slice CT. For all heart rate groups, per-patient diagnostic accuracy was significantly higher for multisegment than halfscan reconstruction with values of 95 vs. 79% (p < 0.05, <65 bpm, 38 patients), 85 vs. 66% (p < 0.05, 65-74 bpm, 47 patients), and 78% vs. 41% (p < 0.001, >74 bpm, 41 patients). Differences in diagnostic accuracy between adjacent heart rate groups were only significant for halfscan reconstruction for the comparison between the 65-74 and >74 bpm group (p < 0.05). The vessel lengths free of motion artifacts were significantly longer with multisegment reconstruction in all heart rate groups and for all coronary arteries (p < 0.005). For noninvasive MSCT coronary angiography, both per-patient diagnostic accuracy and image quality decline with increasing heart rate, and multisegment reconstruction at high heart rates yields similar results as standard halfscan reconstruction at low heart rates.

CT coronary angiography: influence of different cardiac reconstruction intervals on image quality and diagnostic accuracy

PURPOSE

To prospectively analyze image quality and diagnostic accuracy of different reconstruction intervals of coronary angiography using multislice computed tomography (MSCT).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

For each of 47 patients, 10 ECG-gated MSCT reconstructions were generated throughout the RR interval from 0 to 90%, resulting in altogether 470 datasets. These datasets were randomly analyzed for image quality and accuracy and compared with conventional angiography. Statistical comparison of intervals was performed using nonparametric analysis for repeated measurements to account for clustering of arteries within patients.

RESULTS

Image reconstruction intervals centered at 80, 70, and 40% of the RR interval resulted (in that order) in the best overall image quality for all four main coronary vessels. Eighty percent reconstructions also yielded the highest diagnostic accuracy of all intervals. The combination of the three best intervals (80, 70, and 40%) significantly reduced the nondiagnostic rate as compared with 80% alone (p=0.005). However, the optimal reconstruction interval combination achieved significantly improved specificities and nondiagnostic rates (p<0.05). The optimal combination consisted of 1.7+/-0.9 reconstruction intervals on average. In approximately half of the patients (49%, 23/47) a single reconstruction was optimal. In 18 (38%), 3 (6%), and 3 (6%) patients one, two, and three additional reconstruction intervals were required, respectively, to achieve optimal quality. In 28% of the patients the optimal combination consisted of reconstructions other than the three best intervals (80, 70, and 40%).

CONCLUSION

Multiple image reconstruction intervals are essential to ensure high image quality and accuracy of CT coronary angiography.

Artifacts in ECG-Synchronized MDCT Coronary Angiography

OBJECTIVE

In MDCT coronary angiography, image artifacts are the major cause of false-positive and false-negative interpretations regarding the presence of coronary artery stenoses. Hence, it is important that observers reporting these investigations are aware of the potential presence of image artifacts and that these artifacts are recognized.

CONCLUSION

The article explores the technical causes for various artifacts in MDCT coronary angiography imaging and clinical examples are given.

Diagnostic Accuracy of Image Postprocessing Methods for the Detection of Coronary Artery Stenoses by Using Multidetector CT1

PURPOSE

To retrospectively evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of multidetector computed tomography (CT) coronary angiography for detection of hemodynamically significant (>or=50%) stenoses by using various image postprocessing methods, with conventional coronary angiography as the reference standard.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The analysis used data from previous studies, use of which had been approved by the Institutional Review Board. Sixteen-section multidetector CT data sets for 40 patients (30 men, 10 women; mean age 56 years +/- 8; mean heart rate, 61 beats per minute +/- 6) were evaluated. Six independent investigators evaluated the data sets for the presence of stenoses with diameter reduction of 50% or more, by using either exclusively transverse images, free oblique multiplanar reconstructions (MPRs), free oblique maximum intensity projections (MIPs, 5 mm thick), prerendered curved MPRs, prerendered curved MIPs, or prerendered three-dimensional volume rendered reconstructions (VRTs). Evaluation results were compared with conventional coronary angiography for each artery in a blinded fashion (chi(2) test).

RESULTS

Overall, 35 coronary artery stenoses were present. Percentage of evaluable arteries and accuracy for detecting stenosis (percentages of accurately classified arteries were, respectively, 99% and 88% for transverse, 99% and 91% for oblique MPR, 94% and 86% for oblique MIP, 94% and 83% for curved MIP, 93% and 81% for curved MPR, and 91% and 73% for VRT). Accuracy was significantly higher for oblique MPR than for curved MPR (P=.01), curved MIP (P=.03), and VRT (P<.001).

CONCLUSION

The evaluation of multidetector CT coronary angiography with interactive image display methods, especially interactive oblique MPRs, permits higher diagnostic accuracy than evaluation of prerendered images (curved MPR, curved MIP, or VRT images).