Hemodynamic Effects of Clot Entrapment in the TrapEase Inferior Vena Cava Filter

The application of inferior vena cava filters in orthopaedics and current research advances

Deep vein thrombosis is a common clinical peripheral vascular disease that occurs frequently in orthopaedic patients and may lead to pulmonary embolism (PE) if the thrombus is dislodged. pulmonary embolism can be prevented by placing an inferior vena cava filter (IVCF) to intercept the dislodged thrombus. Thus, IVCFs play an important role in orthopaedics. However, the occurrence of complications after inferior vena cava filter placement, particularly recurrent thromboembolism, makes it necessary to carefully assess the risk-benefit of filter placement. There is no accepted statement as to whether IVCF should be placed in orthopaedic patients. Based on the problems currently displayed in the use of IVCFs, an ideal IVCF is proposed that does not affect the vessel wall and haemodynamics and intercepts thrombi well. The biodegradable filters that currently exist come close to the description of an ideal filter that can reduce the occurrence of various complications. Currently available biodegradable IVCFs consist of various organic polymeric materials. Biodegradable metals have shown good performance in making biodegradable IVCFs. However, among the available experimental studies on degradable filters, there are no experimental studies on filters made of degradable metals. This article reviews the use of IVCFs in orthopaedics, the current status of filters and the progress of research into biodegradable vena cava filters and suggests possible future developments based on the published literature by an electronic search of PubMed and Medline databases for articles related to IVCFs searchable by October 2022 and a manual search for citations to relevant studies.

Evaluation of hemodynamic effects of different inferior vena cava filter heads using computational fluid dynamics

Inferior vena cava (IVC) filters are used to prevent pulmonary embolism in patients with deep vein thrombosis for whom anticoagulation is unresponsive. The head is a necessary structure for an Inferior vena cava filter (IVCF) in clinic use. At present, there are various head configurations for IVCFs. However, the effect of head pattern on the hemodynamics of IVCF is still a matter of unclear. In this study, computational fluid dynamics is used to simulate non-Newtonian blood flows around four IVCFs with different heads inside an IVC model, in which the Denali filter with a solid and hooked head is employed as a prototype, and three virtual variants are reconstructed either with a no-hook head or with a through-hole head for comparison. The simulation results show that the through-hole head can effectively avoid the recirculation region and weaken the blood flow stasis closely downstream the IVCF head. The shape change of the filter head has no significant effect on the blood flow acceleration inside the IVCF cone as well as little influence on the wall shear stress (WSS) distribution on the filter wire surface and IVC wall. The structure pattern of filter head greatly affects the flow resistance of its own. However, the flow drag of filter head only occupies a small proportion of the total resistance of IVCF. Therefore, to reduce the flow resistance of an IVCF should optimize its whole structure.

Outcome of anticoagulation with rivaroxaban in patients with non-retrieved inferior vena cava filters for the prevention of filter thrombosis: a retrospective cohort study

Background

Non-retrieved inferior vena cava filter (IVCF) is associated with some severe complications, such as filter thrombosis. The aim of this retrospective cohort study was to evaluate the outcome of rivaroxaban for the prevention of filter thrombosis in patients with non-retrieved IVCF.

Methods

The study based on the VTE registry databases was limited to patients with non-retrieved IVCF treated at Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital from January 2012 to December 2017. Outcomes included filter thrombosis, total bleeding events, death.

Results

A total of 202 patients were enrolled in the study and divided into rivaroxaban group and warfarin group. Mean follow-up period of the two groups was 57.4 ± 20.8 and 62.2 ± 23.0 months, respectively. In risk factors for VTE, transient factors (P = 0.008) and history of VTE (P = 0.028) were statistically different between the two groups. A total of 13 (6.4%) patients developed filter complications, of which 4 (3.5%) and 5 (5.7%) patients in rivaroxaban group and warfarin group developed filter thrombosis, respectively, without significant difference (P = 0.690). The total bleeding events in rivaroxaban group, including major bleeding and clinically relevant and non-major (CRNM) bleeding, were significantly lower than that in warfarin group (P = 0.005). Adjusting for hypertension, transient risk factors, history of VTE and cancer, no differences in the hazard ratio for outcomes were notable.

Conclusions

It is necessary to perform a concomitant anticoagulation in patients with non-retrieved filters. Rivaroxaban can be an alternative anticoagulant option for the prevention of filter thrombosis.

Effects of reverse deployment of cone-shaped vena cava filter on improvements in hemodynamic performance in vena cava

Background

Cone-shaped vena cava filters (VCFs) are widely used to treat venous thromboembolism. However, in the long term, the problem of occlusion persists even after the filter is deployed. A previous study hypothesized that the reverse deployment of a cone-shaped VCFs may prevent filter blockage.

Methods

To explore this hypothesis, a comparative study of the traditional and reverse deployments of VCFs was conducted using a computational fluid dynamics approach. The distribution of wall shear stress (WSS) and shear stress-related parameters were calculated to evaluate the differences in hemodynamic effects between both conditions. In the animal experiment, we reversely deployed a filter in the vena cava of a goat and analyzed the blood clot distribution in the filter.

Results

The numerical simulation showed that the reverse deployment of a VCF resulted in a slightly higher shear rate on the thrombus, and no reductions in the oscillating shear index (OSI) and relative residence time (RRT) on the vessel wall. Comparing the traditional method with the reversely deployed cases, the shear rate values is 16.49 and 16.48 1/s, respectively; the minimal OSI values are 0.01 and 0.04, respectively; in the vicinity of the VCF, the RRT values are both approximately 5 1/Pa; and the WSS is approximately 0.3 Pa for both cases. Therefore, the reverse deployment of cone-shaped filters is not advantageous when compared with the traditional method in terms of local hemodynamics. However, it is effective in capturing thrombi in the short term, as demonstrated via animal experiments. The reversely deployed cone-shaped filter captured the thrombi at its center in the experiments.

Conclusions

Thus, the reverse deployment of cone-shaped filters is not advantageous when compared with the traditional method in terms of local hemodynamics. Therefore, we would not suggest the reverse deployment of the cone-shaped filter in the vena cava to prevent a potentially fatal pulmonary embolism.

Hemodynamic Analysis of VenaTech Convertible Vena Cava Filter Using Computational Fluid Dynamics

The VenaTech convertible filter (VTCF) has been widely used as an inferior vena cava (IVC) filter to prevent fatal pulmonary embolism in patients. However, its hemodynamics that greatly affect the filter efficacy and IVC patency are still unclear. This paper uses computational fluid dynamics with the Carreau model to simulate the non-Newtonian blood flows around the VTCF respectively deployed in the normal, reverse and three converted states in an IVC model. The results show that the prothrombotic stagnation zones are observed downstream from the normal, reverse and small open VTCFs, with the streamwise length is nearly eight times the IVC diameter. The no-slip boundary conditions of the thin-wire VTCF arms lead to the “viscous block” effect. The viscous block accelerates the blood flow by 5–15% inside the IVC and enhances the filter wall shear stress up to nearly 20 times that of the IVC only, which contributes to clot capture and thrombus lysis. The relative flow resistance is defined to evaluate the filter-induced resistance on the IVC blood flow that can be regarded as an index of IVC patency with the filter deployment. The flow resistance of the normal VTCF deployment increases dramatically by more than 60% compared with that of the IVC only and is a little higher (6%) than that of the reverse case. As the VTCF converts to a fully open configuration, the flow resistance gradually decreases to that of no filter. This work shows that even very thin VTCF arms can result in the viscous block effect and may cause significant hemodynamic impacts on clot capture, potential thrombosis and flow impedance inside the IVC. The present study also shows that CFD is a valuable and feasible in silico tool for analyzing the IVC filter hemodynamics to complement in vivo clinical and in vitro experimental studies.

Inferior vena cava filter – comprehensive overview of current indications, techniques, complications and retrieval rates

Summary: Inferior vena cava (IVC) filter has been used to manage patients with pulmonary embolism and deep venous thrombosis. Its ease of use and the expansion of relative indications have led to a dramatic increase in IVC filter placement. However, IVC filters have been associated with a platitude of complications. Therefore, there exists a need to examine the current indications and identify the patient population at risk. In this paper, we comprehensively reviewed the current indications and techniques of IVC filter placement. Further, we examined the various complications associated with either permanent or retrievable IVC filters. Lastly, we examined the current data on filter retrieval.

Hemodynamic effects of blood clots trapped by an inferior vena cava filter

The alteration of blood flow around an OPTEASE inferior vena cava filter with one or two blood clots attached was investigated by means of computational fluid dynamics. We used a patient-specific vein wall geometry, and we generated different clot models with shapes adapted to the filter and vein wall geometries. A total of eight geometries, with one or two clots and a total clot volume of 0.5 or 1 cm³ , were considered. A non-Newtonian model for blood viscosity was adopted and the possible development of turbulence was accounted for by means of a three-equation model. Two blood flow rates were considered for each case, representative for rest and exercise conditions. In exercise conditions, flow unsteadiness and even turbulence was detected in some cases. Pressure and wall shear stress (WSS) distributions were modified in all cases. Clots attached to the filter downstream basket considerably increased averaged WSS values by up to almost 50%. In all the cases a flow recirculation region appeared downstream of the clot. The degree of flow stagnation in these regions, an indicator of propensity to thrombogenesis, was estimated in terms of mean residence times and mean blood viscosity. High levels of flow stagnation were detected in rest conditions in the wake of those clots that were placed upstream from the filter. Our results suggest that one downstream placed big clot, showing a higher tendency to induce flow instabilities and turbulence, might be more harmful than two small clots placed in tandem.

Inferior Vena Cava Filter Evaluation and Management for the Diagnostic Radiologist: A Comprehensive Review Including Inferior Vena Cava Filter-Related Complications and PRESERVE Trial Filters

Inferior vena cava filters are commonly encountered devices on diagnostic imaging that were highlighted in a 2010 Food and Drug Administration safety advisory regarding their complications from long-term implantation. The Predicting the Safety and Effectiveness of Inferior Vena Cava Filters (PRESERVE) trial is an ongoing after-market study investigating the safety and utility of commonly utilized filters in practice today. While most of these filters are safe, prompt recognition and management of any filter-associated complication is imperative to prevent or reduce the morbidity and mortality associated with them. This review is aimed at discussing the appropriate utilization and placement of inferior vena cava filters in addition to the recognition of filter-associated complications on cross-sectional imaging. An overview of the PRESRVE trial filters is also provided to understand each filter's propensity for specific complications.

Inferior Vena Cava Filters: Why, Who, and for How Long?

Vena cava filters are implantable devices that are placed to trap thrombus originating in the lower extremities and prevent it from migrating to the lungs. In general, inferior vena cava (IVC) filters are indicated for patients who cannot receive anticoagulation. Other indications for IVC filtration are less clear, and guidelines vary. All patients who have a retrievable IVC filter should be followed, and the removal of the IVC filter should be considered once its indication is lost.

Calibration of interface properties and application to a finite element model for predicting vena cava filter-induced vein wall failure

We present a computational framework that integrates experimental techniques and finite element modeling to calibrate material fracture parameters of the vena cava and the interaction properties between a retrievable filter (Günther Tulip) and the vena cava wall. The fitted parameters were then used to analyze the interaction of the inferior vena cava filter with the vena cava during the deployment process. An idealized cava finite element model was then developed including residual stresses and physiological pressure conditions. Filter deployment was simulated, and a comprehensive study of tissue-filter interaction was performed by cohesive surface modeling. Simulations predict that there are no fracture areas for either model, so we can conclude that there is no penetration of the anchor into the vena cava. This suggests there are other physiological situations, such as the Valsalva maneuver, which could produce this penetration observed on some patients.

Influence of a Commercial Antithrombotic Filter on the Caval Blood Flow During Neutra and Valsalva Maneuver

Anticoagulants are the treatment of choice for pulmonary embolism. When these fail or are contraindicated, vena cava filters are effective devices for preventing clots from the legs from migrating to the lung. Many uncertainties exist when a filter is inserted, especially during physiological activity such as normal breathing and the Valsalva maneuver. These activities are often connected with filter migration and vena cava damage due to the various related vein geometrical configurations. In this work, we analyzed the response of the vena cava during normal breathing and Valsalva maneuver, for a healthy vena cava and after insertion of a commercial Günther-Tulip® filter. Validated computational fluid dynamics (CFD) and patient specific data are used for analyzing blood flow inside the vena cava during these maneuvers. While during normal breathing, the vena cava flow can be considered almost stationary with a very low pressure gradient, during Valsalva the extravascular pressure compresses the vena cava resulting in a drastic reduction of the vein section, a global flow decrease through the cava but increasing the velocity magnitude. This change in the section is altered by the presence of the filter which forces the section of the vena cava before the renal veins to keep open. The effect of the presence of the filter is investigated during these maneuvers showing changes in wall shear stress and velocity patterns.

Improvement of hemodynamic performance using novel helical flow vena cava filter design

We propose a vena cava filter in which helical flow is created in the filter’s working zone to minimize filter blockage by trapped clots and facilitate the lysis of trapped clots. To validate this new design, we compared five helical flow inducers with different thread pitches in terms of blood flow patterns in the filter. The vena cava was reconstructed based on computed tomography images. Both the numerical simulation and in vitro experiment revealed that the helical flow inducer can effectively create a helical flow in the vessel, thereby subduing the filter structure’s adverse disruption to blood flow, and increasing flow-induced shear stress in the filter center. In addition, the smaller thread pitch helical flow inducer reduced the oscillating shear index and relative residence time on the vessel wall. Moreover, we observed that the helical flow inducer in the vena cava could induce flow rotation both in clockwise and counterclockwise directions. In conclusion, the new design of the filter with the smaller thread pitch inducer is advantageous over the traditional filter in terms of improving local hemodynamics, which may reduce thrombosis build-up after deployment.

Inferior Vena Cava Filter-Related Thrombus/Deep Vein Thrombosis: Data and Management

Recurrent deep venous thrombosis and inferior vena cava (IVC) thrombosis are well-described complications following IVC filter placement. IVC thrombosis ranges in severity of clinical presentation, but can lead to significant morbidity and mortality with incidence rates depending on patient population and type of filter used. Endovascular therapies such as catheter-directed thrombolysis, mechanical thrombectomy, balloon venoplasty, and stenting are safe and effective in restoration of venous patency.

Endovascular treatment of acute renal failure secondary to caval thrombosis and suprarenal filter migration

Although inferior vena cava filter placement is a safe and effective method of reducing the risk of pulmonary embolism, devastating complications can result from thrombosis and migration. Here we present a case of acute renal failure as a result of suprarenal inferior vena cava filter migration and caval thrombosis. We discuss a novel endovascular approach for its management by mechanical aspirational thrombectomy.

Tips and tricks for retrieval of permanent TRAPEASE® filters for inferior vena cava

The placement of permanent inferior vena cava filters has definite indications and some filters have been shown to be more problematic in the long term than others. This report outlines the technique for TRAPEASE® filter removal in two patients. The first filter was retrieved four weeks after insertion and the second filter was retrieved 14 months after it was inserted at another institution. A planned approach for retrieval is described in these case reports.

A Computational Method for Predicting Inferior Vena Cava Filter Performance on a Patient-Specific Basis

A computational methodology for simulating virtual inferior vena cava (IVC) filter placement and IVC hemodynamics was developed and demonstrated in two patient-specific IVC geometries: a left-sided IVC and an IVC with a retroaortic left renal vein. An inverse analysis was performed to obtain the approximate in vivo stress state for each patient vein using nonlinear finite element analysis (FEA). Contact modeling was then used to simulate IVC filter placement. Contact area, contact normal force, and maximum vein displacements were higher in the retroaortic IVC than in the left-sided IVC (144 mm2, 0.47 N, and 1.49 mm versus 68 mm2, 0.22 N, and 1.01 mm, respectively). Hemodynamics were simulated using computational fluid dynamics (CFD), with four cases for each patient-specific vein: (1) IVC only, (2) IVC with a placed filter, (3) IVC with a placed filter and model embolus, all at resting flow conditions, and (4) IVC with a placed filter and model embolus at exercise flow conditions. Significant hemodynamic differences were observed between the two patient IVCs, with the development of a right-sided jet, larger flow recirculation regions, and lower maximum flow velocities in the left-sided IVC. These results support further investigation of IVC filter placement and hemodynamics on a patient-specific basis.

The Future of Deep Venous Thrombosis and Post-thrombotic Syndrome in 2020

This manuscript addresses six major issues involving deep venous thrombosis (DVT) and post-thrombotic syndrome. Prevention will likely see modest advances in pharmacological therapy mainly by extending prophylaxis in high-risk patients. More notable advances will be observed in mechanical means of prophylaxis, focusing on sustained application of devices that can move larger volumes of blood. Silent, large-vein thrombi continue to place patients at risk for fatal pulmonary embolism. Improved imaging techniques will permit us to identify these patients over the next eight years. In many of those patients, vena caval interruption will be required. Elimination of high-risk filters and the production of improved filters placed through low-profile systems with antithrombotic agents bound to their surface will improve the short- and long-term results for inferior vena cava filters. The long-term management of DVT will focus on establishing appropriate duration for the individual patient and will see the evolution towards direct Xa and Ha inhibitors. Patients with extensive DVT will more commonly receive treatment strategies designed to eliminate thrombus and restore patency. This will substantially reduce post-thrombotic morbidity and reduce recurrence. Post-thrombotic syndrome will see greater attention towards treating the intraluminal fibrosis, thereby eliminating post-thrombotic venous obstruction. Unfortunately, neovalves will still be searching for the appropriate application.

Inferior vena cava filter thrombosis: a review of current concepts, evidence, and approach to management

The increased risk of venous thrombosis within and below the inferior vena cava (IVC) is the main long-term complication of IVC filter placement. In this article, we discuss current concepts regarding the incidence, risks, and management of IVC filter thrombosis. Evidence of the association of each of the following factors is reviewed: type and design of the filter device, population demographics, underlying hypercoagulable states/anticoagulation, modality used to assess for thrombosis, and length of time elapsed since filter placement. Certain double-basket filter designs and a hypercoagulable state are associated with increased incidence of IVC filter thrombosis. Most cases of IVC filter thrombosis are asymptomatic. While large series data on the use of magnetic resonance imaging for the detection of filter thrombosis remain unavailable, evidence suggests that contrast-enhanced computed tomography is preferable to Doppler sonography. A proposed algorithm for the management of IVC filter thrombosis is provided.

Endothelial cell morphologic response to asymmetric stenosis hemodynamics: effects of spatial wall shear stress gradients

Endothelial cells are known to respond to hemodynamic forces. Their phenotype has been suggested to differ between atheroprone and atheroprotective regions of the vasculature, which are characterized by the local hemodynamic environment. Once an atherosclerotic plaque has formed in a vessel, the obstruction creates complex spatial gradients in wall shear stress. Endothelial cell response to wall shear stress may be linked to the stability of coronary plaques. Unfortunately, in vitro studies of the endothelial cell involvement in plaque stability have been limited by unrealistic and simplified geometries, which cannot reproduce accurately the hemodynamics created by a coronary stenosis. Hence, in an attempt to better replicate the spatial wall shear stress gradient patterns in an atherosclerotic region, a three dimensional asymmetric stenosis model was created. Human abdominal aortic endothelial cells were exposed to steady flow (Re=50, 100, and 200 and tau=4.5 dyn/cm(2), 9 dyn/cm(2), and 18 dyn/cm(2)) in idealized 50% asymmetric stenosis and straight/tubular in vitro models. Local morphological changes that occur due to magnitude, duration, and spatial gradients were quantified to identify differences in cell response. In the one dimensional flow regions, where flow is fully developed and uniform wall shear stress is observed, cells aligned in flow direction and had a spindlelike shape when compared with static controls. Morphological changes were progressive and a function of time and magnitude in these regions. Cells were more randomly oriented and had a more cobblestone shape in regions of spatial wall shear stress gradients. These regions were present, both proximal and distal, at the stenosis and on the wall opposite to the stenosis. The response of endothelial cells to spatial wall shear stress gradients both in regions of acceleration and deceleration and without flow recirculation has not been previously reported. This study shows the dependence of endothelial cell morphology on spatial wall shear stress gradients and demonstrates that care must be taken to account for altered phenotype due to geometric features. These results may help explain plaque stability, as cells in shoulder regions near an atherosclerotic plaque had a cobblestone morphology indicating that they may be more permeable to subendothelial transport and express prothrombotic factors, which would increase the risk of atherothrombosis.

The response of human aortic endothelial cells in a stenotic hemodynamic environment: effect of duration, magnitude, and spatial gradients in wall shear stress

Inflammation plays a key role in the development and stability of coronary plaques. Endothelial cells alter their expression in response to wall shear stress (WSS). Straight/tubular and asymmetric stenosis models were designed to study the localized expression of atheroprone molecules and inflammatory markers due to the presence of the spatial wall shear stress gradients created by an eccentric plaque. The effects of steady wall shear stress duration (0-24 h) and magnitude (4.5-18 dynes/cm(2)) were analyzed in human abdominal aortic endothelial cells through quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and immunofluorescence analysis in straight/tubular models. Regional expression was assessed by immunofluorescence and confocal microscopy in stenosis models. Under steady fully developed flow, endothelial cells exhibited a sustained increase in levels of atheroprotective genes with WSS duration and magnitude. The local response in the stenosis model showed that expression of endothelial nitric oxide synthase and Kruppel-like factor 2 is magnitude rather than gradient dependent. A WSS magnitude dependent transient increase in translocation of transcription factor nuclear factor kappaB was observed. Intercellular adhesion molecule 1, vascular cell adhesion molecule 1, and E-selectin exhibited a sustained increase in protein expression with time. The mRNA levels of these molecules were transiently upregulated and this was followed by a decrease in expression to levels lower than static controls. Regionally, increased inflammatory marker expression was observed in regions of WSS gradients both proximal and distal to the stenosis when compared with the uniform flow regions, whereas the atheroprotective markers were expressed to a greater extent in regions of elevated WSS magnitudes. The results from the straight/tubular model cannot explain the regional variation seen in the stenosis models. This may help explain the localization of inflammatory cells at the shoulders of plaques in vivo.

Design Optimization of Vena Cava Filters: An Application to Dual Filtration Devices

Pulmonary embolism (PE) is a significant medical problem that results in over 300,000 fatalities per year. A common preventative treatment for PE is the insertion of a metallic filter into the inferior vena cava that traps thrombi before they reach the lungs. The goal of this work is to use methods of mathematical modeling and design optimization to determine the configuration of trapped thrombi that minimizes the hemodynamic disruption. The resulting configuration has implications for constructing an optimally designed vena cava filter. Computational fluid dynamics is coupled with a nonlinear optimization algorithm to determine the optimal configuration of a trapped model thrombus in the inferior vena cava. The location and shape of the thrombus are parametrized, and an objective function, based on wall shear stresses, determines the worthiness of a given configuration. The methods are fully automated and demonstrate the capabilities of a design optimization framework that is broadly applicable. Changes to thrombus location and shape alter the velocity contours and wall shear stress profiles significantly. For vena cava filters that trap two thrombi simultaneously, the undesirable flow dynamics past one thrombus can be mitigated by leveraging the flow past the other thrombus. Streamlining the shape of the thrombus trapped along the cava wall reduces the disruption to the flow but increases the area exposed to low wall shear stress. Computer-based design optimization is a useful tool for developing vena cava filters. Characterizing and parametrizing the design requirements and constraints is essential for constructing devices that address clinical complications. In addition, formulating a well-defined objective function that quantifies clinical risks and benefits is needed for designing devices that are clinically viable.

Neutrophil adhesion on endothelial cells in a novel asymmetric stenosis model: effect of wall shear stress gradients

Leukocytes play a pivotal role in the progression of atherosclerosis. A novel three-dimensional in vitro asymmetric stenosis model was used to better investigate the role of local hemodynamics in the adhesion of leukocytes to an established plaque. The adhesion of a human promyelocytic cell line (NB4) on a human abdominal aortic endothelial cell (EC) monolayer was quantified. NB4 cells were circulated over TNF-alpha stimulated and nonstimulated ECs for 1 or 6 h at 1.25 or 6.25 dynes/cm(2) and compared to static conditions. Cytokine stimulation increased significantly EC expression of intercellular adhesion molecule and vascular cell adhesion molecule. Under static conditions, neutrophils adhered overall more than under flow, with decreased adhesion with increasing shear. Adhesion was significantly higher in the recirculation region distal to the stenosis than in the inlet. Preshearing the ECs decreased the expression of cell adhesion molecules in inflamed endothelium and significantly decreased adhesion. However, the ratio of adhesion between the recirculation zone and the inlet increased, hence exhibiting an increased regional difference. This work suggests an important role for neutrophil-EC interactions in the atherosclerotic process, especially in wall shear stress gradient regions. This is important clinically, potentially helping to explain plaque stability.

Vena cava filter occlusion and venous thromboembolism risk in persistently anticoagulated patients: a prospective, observational cohort study

BACKGROUND

Inferior vena cava (IVC) filter placement may be life-saving, but after contraindications to anticoagulation remit, patient management is uncertain.

METHODS

We followed patients who had venous thromboembolism, followed by treatment with permanent IVC filter placement, and were anticoagulated long-term as soon as safety allowed. We conducted annual physical examinations and ultrasound surveillance of the lower extremity deep veins and of the IVC filter site. Clot detected at the filter site was treated with graded intensities of anticoagulation, depending on the clot burden.

RESULTS

Symptomatic DVT occurred in 24 of 121 patients (20%; 95% CI, 14%-28%); symptomatic pulmonary embolism (one fatal) was diagnosed in six patients (5%; 95% CI, 2%-10%). There were 45 episodes of filter clot in 36 patients (30%; 95% CI, 22%-38%). The rate of major bleeding (6.6%) was similar to that of a concurrent persistently anticoagulated cohort without IVC filters (5.8%).

CONCLUSIONS

If therapeutic anticoagulation can be safely begun in patients with IVC filters inserted after venous thromboembolism, further management with clinical surveillance, including ultrasound examination of the IVC filter and graded degrees of anticoagulation therapy if filter clot is detected, has a favorable prognosis. This approach appears valid for patients with current IVC filter and can serve as a comparison standard in subsequent clinical trials to optimize clinical management of these patients.

Retrievable vena cava filters: a clinical review

Vena cava filters were developed as a method of preventing pulmonary embolism (PE) in patients with venous thromboembolism (VTE) at risk for bleeding from therapeutic anticoagulation. However, the long-term complications of filter placement, such as caval thrombosis, have mitigated some of the benefits, particularly in those patients with only a temporary contraindication to anticoagulation. Retrievable filters were designed to avoid the long-term risks of a permanent filter while still providing short-term protection against PE. As a result, their use has expanded from patients with known thrombosis to those without VTE who are at high risk for developing PE. In this review, we discuss the different types of retrievable filters, indications for their placement, complications that can occur during and after placement, and their use as prophylaxis in surgical patients. Although the use of retrievable filters in patients with known VTE is clear, further studies are needed to establish their prophylactic efficacy in the surgical patient. Until this evidence is available, we recommend that retrievable filters should be used only in patients with acute VTE who are at risk for recurrent thromboembolism and have a transient risk for bleeding.

Vena cava filters and inferior vena cava thrombosis

OBJECTIVE

Retrievable vena cava filters (R-VCF) are a recent addition to the therapeutic armamentarium for the prevention of pulmonary embolism. However, unlike permanent vena cava filters (P-VCF), outcomes data are limited regarding complication rates.

METHODS

This was a retrospective comparative analysis of consecutive patients undergoing placement of R-VCF vs P-VCF at Wake Forest University School of Medicine from January 2000 to December 2004. Data collected included demographics, procedural specifics, filter type, indications, and complications. Summary data are expressed as number (percentage) or mean +/- SD. Continuous and categorical variables were analyzed by using t and Fisher exact testing, as appropriate. Four additional patients with vena cava thrombosis were also referred to our institution for treatment during the study period, all with opposed biconical VCFs (OptEase and TrapEase filters) recently placed at other facilities. This last group of patients is described but not included in the analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 189 VCF (165 P-VCF and 24 R-VCF) cases were examined. No significant differences in VCF groups were observed according to age, documented hypercoagulability, or concomitant anticoagulation. Significant differences were observed according to sex (30.3% of P-VCF vs 62.5% of R-VCF patients were female), morbid obesity (4.2% of P-VCF vs 25% of R-VCF patients), active malignancy (20% of P-VCF vs 41.7% of R-VCF patients), and indication for VCF placement. Over a median follow-up of 8.5 months, no case of significant hemorrhage, no VCF migration, and four cases of vena cava thrombosis were observed. Vena cava thrombosis was observed more frequently in the presence of R-VCF when compared with P-VCF (12.5% vs 0.6%; P = .007). All observed vena cava thromboses were associated with severe clinical symptoms and occurred in patients who received opposed biconical VCF designs.

CONCLUSIONS

In our experience, both P-VCF and R-VCF can be placed safely. Among both permanent and retrievable devices, however, opposed biconical designs seem to be associated with an increased risk for vena cava thrombosis. Although causative factors remain unclear, filter design and resultant flow dynamics may play an important role, because all episodes of vena cava thrombosis occurred in patients with a single-filter design.

Estimation of Trapped Thrombus Volumes in Retrievable Inferior Vena Cava Filters: A Visual Scale

PURPOSE

To establish a visual, objective scale for estimating trapped thrombus volumes in five types of retrievable inferior vena cava filters.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Silicone-based radiopaque polymer volumes of 0.25, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 3.0, and 4.0 mL were created. Both sphere and cone shapes were used. Polymer volumes were confirmed by means of the water displacement method. The volumes were then positioned to simulate trapped thrombus in five retrievable filters: Recovery and G2 (Bard Peripheral Vascular, Tempe, Ariz), Günther Tulip and Celect (Cook, Bloomington, Ind), and OptEase (Cordis Endovascular, Warren, NJ). Radiographs were obtained by using conventional parameters. Visual scales of thrombus volume were created for each filter type.

RESULTS

Visual scales for each retrievable filter type were created with simulated thrombi in typical trapping positions.

CONCLUSION

The authors developed a visual, objective scale for estimating trapped thrombus volume in five types of retrievable IVC filters. This could facilitate standardized reporting of thrombus volumes in studies of optional vena cava filters.

Vena Cava Filter Performance Based on Hemodynamics and Reported Thrombosis and Pulmonary Embolism Patterns

PURPOSE

Three inferior vena cava (IVC) filters of different designs were studied to identify the potential links between published clinical results for thrombosis and recurrent pulmonary embolism (PE) rates and in vitro hemodynamics patterns in the region of the filters.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The filters studied were the Greenfield over-the-wire filter (Medi-tech/Boston Scientific, Watertown, Mass), TrapEase filter (Cordis Europa, Roden, the Netherlands), and Mobin-Uddin umbrella filter (Edwards Laboratories, Santa Ana, Calif). To assess hemodynamics, velocity contour maps were generated for each filter by using the in vitro photochromic flow visualization technique. Results were obtained for both the unoccluded and partially occluded states. Steady flow (R(e) = 600) was used to model physiologic conditions. To estimate the rates of IVC occlusion and recurrent PE, the authors analyzed published clinical studies spanning more than 30 years and a U.S. Food and Drug Administration database.

RESULTS

For both the unoccluded and partially occluded Mobin-Uddin and TrapEase filters, regions of flow stagnation and/or recirculation and turbulence developed downstream of the filter. The Greenfield filter did not produce any prothrombotic flow patterns for either the unoccluded or partially occluded states. Results of published clinical studies supported the hemodynamic findings, with the TrapEase and Mobin-Uddin filters having high rates of IVC occlusion and recurrent PE compared with those of the Greenfield filter.

CONCLUSIONS

Flow stagnation or recirculation and turbulence have been linked to thrombosis and thrombus and/or PE formation. Thus, the hemodynamic results from this study may help explain the relatively higher rates of filter thrombosis and PE for the Mobin-Uddin and TrapEase filters versus the Greenfield filter.

Practice Patterns and Outcomes of Retrievable Vena Cava Filters in Trauma Patients: An AAST Multicenter Study

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study is to describe practice patterns and outcomes of posttraumatic retrievable inferior vena caval filters (R-IVCF).

METHODS

A retrospective review of R-IVCFs placed during 2004 at 21 participating centers with follow up to July 1, 2005 was performed. Primary outcomes included major complications (migration, pulmonary embolism [PE], and symptomatic caval occlusion) and reasons for failure to retrieve.

RESULTS

Of 446 patients (69% male, 92% blunt trauma) receiving R-IVCFs, 76% for prophylactic indications and 79% were placed by interventional radiology. Excluding 33 deaths, 152 were Gunter-Tulip (G-T), 224 Recovery (R), and 37 Optease (Opt). Placement occurred 6 +/- 8 days after admission and retrieval at 50 +/- 61 days. Follow up after discharge (5.7 +/- 4.3 months) was reported in 51%. Only 22% of R-IVCFs were retrieved. Of 115 patients in whom retrieval was attempted, retrieval failed as a result of technical issues in 15 patients (10% of G-T, 14% of R, 27% of Opt) and because of significant residual thrombus within the filter in 10 patients (6% of G-T, 4% of R, 46% Opt). The primary reason R-IVCFs were not removed was because of loss to follow up (31%), which was sixfold higher (6% to 44%, p = 0.001) when the service placing the R-IVCF was not directly responsible for follow up. Complications did not correlate with mechanism, injury severity, service placing the R-IVCF, trauma volume, use of anticoagulation, age, or sex. Three cases of migration were recorded (all among R, 1.3%), two breakthrough PE (G-T 0.6% and R 0.4%) and six symptomatic caval occlusions (G-T 0, R 1%, Opt 11%) (p < 0.05 Opt versus both G-T and R).

CONCLUSION

Most R-IVCFs are not retrieved. The service placing the R-IVCF should be responsible for follow up. The Optease was associated with the greatest incidence of residual thrombus and symptomatic caval occlusion. The practice patterns of R-IVCF placement and retrieval should be re-examined.

Early Experience with the Retrievable OptEase Vena Cava Filter in High-risk Trauma Patients

OBJECTIVES

Prophylactic vena cava filters (VCF) are efficient in preventing pulmonary embolism. Filter retrieval avoids the potential long-term complications of permanent VCF. Clinical evaluation was focused on filter-related complications and feasibility of retrieval in high-risk trauma patients.

METHODS

Analysis of single-institution consecutive case series of patients who received a prophylactic OptEase VCF after multiple trauma between 08/2003 and 12/2004. Data were collected prospectively.

RESULTS

A total of 37 OptEase filters were inserted prophylactically after multiple trauma (median patient age 35 years, range, 17-73 years, median ISS 41, range, 17-59). All patients had contraindications for pharmacological prophylaxis for thromboembolic events. 32 filters (86%) were retrieved after 16 days (range, 7-25 days). 12 of 33 filters (36%) demonstrated trapped clots/thrombosis within the filter structure on pre-retrieval cavography. Two patients received anticoagulation before filter retrieval due to filter thrombosis (6%). Symptomatic PE was observed in 1 patient (3%) 5 days after VCF retrieval. Minor caudal filter migration was observed in 1 patient (3%). Overall mortality was 3%.

CONCLUSIONS

Retrieval of the OptEase filter is safe and feasible. Temporary filter placement avoids possible long-term complications of permanent VCF. It is an efficient form of PE prophylaxis when temporary contraindications to anticoagulation are present.

Vena cava filters: an update

Venous thromboembolism is a major health problem that results in significant long-term complications and mortality. The management of venous thromboembolism is complex and can be particularly challenging when pharmacological therapy alone cannot be effectively utilized. Vena cava filters provide protection from pulmonary embolism for patients in whom therapeutic anticoagulation is contraindicated or inadequate. Recent innovations in caval interruption have included the use of alternative imaging modalities for filter insertion and the emergence of devices designed to allow temporary caval filtration. These developments have been accompanied by a controversial increase in the use of vena cava filters for prophylactic indications in the absence of venous thromboembolism. In addition to a brief historical perspective on caval filtration, this update reviews the indications for vena cava filter insertion, associated complications, methods of caval imaging and filter insertion and current FDA-approved devices.

TrapEase Vena Cava Filter:Experience in 751 Patients

PURPOSE

To evaluate the clinical safety and efficacy of the TrapEase vena cava filter in a 4-year single-center experience.

METHODS

The clinical and imaging data of 751 patients (384 men; mean age 64 years, range 16-99) who had a TrapEase inferior vena cava (IVC) filter placed between January 1, 2001, and December 31, 2004, were reviewed retrospectively. More than a third of patients (297, 39.5%) presented with pulmonary embolism (PE), 188 (25.0%) had deep vein thrombosis (DVT), 40 (5.3%) had both PE and DVT, and the rest (226, 30.1%) had other symptoms. Indications for filter placement were contraindication to anticoagulation (461, 61.4%), complication of anticoagulation (42, 5.6%), failure of anticoagulation (39, 5.2%), and prophylaxis (209, 27.8%). Filters were placed in the infrarenal (n=738) or suprarenal (n=13) position through a femoral (n=729) or jugular vein (n=22) approach. Follow-up computed tomographic (CT) scans of the chest and abdomen were evaluated for recurrent PE and filter-related complications, respectively.

RESULTS

Three (0.4%) patients developed groin hematoma. During a mean 295-day clinical follow-up (range 1-1677), 55 (7.5%) patients developed symptoms of PE, and 1 (0.1%) death was attributed to PE. Chest CT performed for various clinical indications in 219 patients at a mean 192 days (range 1-1346) showed PE in 15 (6.8%) patients; 10 were symptomatic and 5 asymptomatic, but there were no fatalities. Follow-up abdominal CT (n=270) at a mean 189 days (range 1-1415) showed fracture of filter components in 8 (3.0%), thrombus within the filter in 68 (25.2%), thrombus extending beyond the filter in 4 (1.5%), near total caval occlusion in 2 (0.7%), and no cases of migration.

CONCLUSION

The TrapEase vena cava filter is effective in the prevention of pulmonary embolism, with minimal complications.

Optional Inferior Vena Cava Filter Retrieval with Retained Thrombus: An in Vitro Model

PURPOSE

Retrieval of an optional inferior vena cava (IVC) filter with retained thrombus may result in pulmonary emboli if the trapped thrombus is not removed along with the filter. An in vitro model was developed to determine the fate of trapped thrombus during filter removal.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

An in vitro IVC flow model was created with 25-mm inner diameter tubing and a 50% glycerol/water solution. Three different optional filters-Recovery (Bard, Tempe, AZ), Günther-Tulip (Cook Inc., Bloomington IN), and OptEase (Cordis Endovascular/Johnson & Johnson, Warren, NJ)-were evaluated in the study. A known mass of mature thrombus (porcine, aged 1 wk) was trapped within the optional filters. The filters were then retrieved according to the manufacturers' protocol, and the mass of thrombus recovered with the filter was determined. For each filter, five iterations were performed with initial thrombus sizes less than 1 g (group A) and an additional five iterations with initial thrombus sizes greater than 1 g (group B).

RESULTS

Thrombi from group A were statistically significantly smaller than those from group B (P < .0001). Retrieval of the Recovery filter resulted in an average of 25% (range, 0%-53%) and 4% (range, 0%-7%) of the clot being removed in group A and group B, respectively. Retrieval of the Günther-Tulip filter resulted in an average of 22% (group A) and 13% (group B) of the clot being removed. Retrieval of the OptEase filter resulted in an average of 43% (group A) and 0% (group B) of the clot being removed.

CONCLUSIONS

In our in vitro model, we have established that the mass of thrombus retrieved with optional filters is only a fraction of the initial clot burden. Because of the risk of pulmonary emboli, care should be taken when IVC filters with large amounts of trapped thrombus are removed from patients.

Numerical Analysis of the Hemodynamics and Embolus Capture of a Greenfield Vena Cava Filter

Background: Vena Cava filters are used to prevent pulmonary embolism in patients with deep vein thrombosis who are unresponsive to anticoagulation therapy. Various filter designs exist in the market with different characteristics distinguishing them. An understanding of the characteristics of these filters is desirable in order to develop better designs. Methods: A computational fluid dynamical study of the flow over an unoccluded stainless steel Greenfield Vena Cava filter (Boston Scientific, Watertown, MA) to determine its properties has been performed. Simulation of flow over a filter placed axisymmetrically in a rounded inferior vena cava has been performed at a Reynolds numbers of 1000 and the consequences of the flow (by studying parameters like shear stress and stagnation zones) have been discussed. Furthermore, a new finite element based numerical method has been developed that allows the study of capturing properties of Inferior Vena Cava filters. The key idea is the introduction of a thin-wire-model (TWM) that enables a drastic reduction in the computational cost while still maintaining control on the physics of the problem. This numerical technique has been applied to evaluate the embolus capture characteristic of a Greenfield filter. Results: The flow around the unoccluded filter is found to be steady and laminar at the conditions studied. A recirculation/stagnation zone develops immediately downstream of the filter head. This zone is significantly larger when the central hole is occluded. The shear stress and stagnation zone properties for such a flow over a Greenfield filter are compared with existing literature (in vitro studies). A graph showing the regions wherein clots escape or get captured has been determined by a means of numerical simulations. The data has further been analyzed to determine the probability of clot capture as function of the clot size. Conclusions: The stagnation zone formed behind the head of the Greenfield filter is found to be smaller in size when compared to that of the same filter with the central hole occluded. A map of the shear stress distribution shows a small region having the potential for thrombogenesis. The non-Newtonian properties of blood are not seen to cause much variation in the flow field when compared to the Newtonian model. However variation in the cava size leads to a significant change in the shear stresses. This study also establishes a novel method wherein computational means are used to determine the efficacy of clot capturing of filters. These techniques can further be used to compare the different characteristics among filters.