Functional and Cosmetic Results of Fingertip Replantation

Sequential Clinical Recovery after Replantation for Complete Finger Amputation in Tamai Zone 1

Background  The clinical results of replantation for an amputated distal finger are functionally acceptable. However, few reports exist regarding sequential clinical postoperative recovery. The purpose of this study was to examine the clinical recovery at every 3 months up to 1 year postoperatively. Methods  Nineteen patients (16 patients were men), representing 19 fingers with complete amputation at Tamai's zone 1 and replanted successfully, were included in this study. Total active motion (TAM), grip strength (GS), Semmes-Weinstein monofilament (SW) test result, static two-point discrimination (s2PD), and Disability of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) score questionnaire results were obtained postoperatively at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months. Pulp atrophy and nail deformity were assessed at 12 months postoperatively. Results  The postoperative %TAM (compared to the uninjured side, 81.8 ± 18.1 at 3 months vs. 91.5 ± 11.9 at 6 months, p  < 0.01), %GS (compared with the uninjured side, 61.3 ± 25.9 at 3 months vs. 78.3 ± 20.4 at 6 months, p  = 0.02), s2PD (excellent and good/poor; 7/12 at 3 months vs. 18/1 at 6 months, p  < 0.01), and DASH scores (26.1 ± 23.1 at 3 months vs. 12.0 ± 12.9 at 6 months, p  < 0.01) recovered significantly from 3 to 6 months but did not change significantly from 6 months onward. The SW test results showed a significant recovery between 3 and 12 months postoperatively (2.83 and 3.61/4.31, 6.65, and undetectable, 1/18 at 3 months vs. 7/12 at 12 months, p  = 0.04). The DASH score at 12 months postoperatively was significantly associated with %TAM ( r  = -0.64, p  < 0.01) and %GS ( r  = -0.58, p  < 0.01) at 12 months postoperatively and age ( r  = 0.52, p  = 0.02). Five fingers had pulp atrophy and four fingers had nail deformity. Conclusion  This 1-year follow-up study showed the sequential clinical recovery after replantation for complete amputation in Tamai zone 1. Postoperative %TAM, %GS, and the DASH score recovered significantly between 3 and 6 months but significant recovery up to 1 year was not observed.

Comparison of Hybrid Abdominal Flap versus Homodigital Neurovascular Island Flap for Fingertip Amputation

Amputation at the level of the distal phalanx is a common hand injury and is normally treated with replantation. However, if the level of injury is distal or the vessels of the stump have been crushed by injury, replantation cannot be a viable option. The aim of this study is to evaluate the functional and aesthetic outcomes of the “hybrid abdominal flap”, which consists of a random-pattern abdominal skin flap and an autologous bone graft. A retrospective analysis was performed on fingertip amputation patients from March 2019 to April 2021. The patients were managed by either hybrid abdominal flaps (HAFs) or homodigital neurovascular island flaps (HNIFs). The functional and aesthetic outcomes were assessed three months after the operations. In this study, a total of 20 fingers were treated with either HAFs or HNIFs. There was a significant difference in the range of motion (ROM) and the scar quality between the two groups. All of the flaps survived without flap necrosis, and non-union of the bone was not observed. The patients were satisfied with the appearance and function of their fingers, including the ROM and sensory aspects. Our novel HAF is a functionally and aesthetically valid option for fingertip amputations with crushed stumps.

Management of Artery-Only Digit Replantation: A Systematic Review of the Literature

BACKGROUND

Artery-only replantation may be necessary in circumstances when venous repair cannot be performed due to their size or vessel injury. Venous congestion of the replanted part is inevitable. A systematic review was performed to identify techniques for mitigating congestion and analyze the outcomes of those techniques.

METHODS

A comprehensive literature search was performed to identify relevant articles related to artery-only replantation. An initial query identified 1286 unique articles. A total of 55 articles were included in the final review. Included studies were categorized by decongestive technique. Data from each article included the number of patients treated, level of amputation, graft use, anticoagulation or antiplatelet therapy, replant viability, and follow-up duration. Weighted averages were determined from studies that reported five or more digits.

RESULTS

A total of 1498 individual digital replantations were described. Very rarely did studies report artery-only replantation proximal to the distal interphalangeal joint. An overall survival rate of 78.5 percent was found irrespective of technique but was variable based on each particular study. Studies utilizing medicinal leech therapy were more likely to report use of intravenous anticoagulation, whereas surface bleeding techniques were more likely to report use of topical or local anticoagulant.

CONCLUSIONS

Lack of a vein for anastomosis should not be regarded as a contraindication to replantation. These digits instead require a method to establish reliable drainage sufficient to allow for low resistance inflow and maintain a physiologic pressure gradient across capillary beds. The surgeon should select a decongestive technique that best suits the patient and their specific injury.

Investigation of Predictors of Successful Replantation of Distal Digits at the Nail Bed Level: The Contribution of Digital Nerve Repair to Survival Rate

BACKGROUND

Replantation of amputated digits at the nail bed level is surgically challenging and differs from replantation at a more proximal amputation level. This study aimed to determine the predictors influencing the success rate of fingertip replantation.

METHODS

Overall, 239 digits of 226 patients who underwent replantation surgery from August of 2009 to March of 2020 were considered. A total of 15 independent variables (i.e., sex; age; injured hand; digit; history of smoking; history of hypertension or diabetes; injury mechanism; amputation level; ischemia duration; surgeon's expertise; numbers of repaired arteries, veins, and nerves; and the need for a vein graft) were investigated for their effects on the survival of the replanted digits.

RESULTS

Of all 239 digits, 190 (79.5 percent) survived. Univariate analysis indicated that non-crush-avulsion injury, expertise and experience of the surgeon, vein repair, and nerve repair contributed to increasing the survival rate. Binary logistic regression analysis demonstrated that injury mechanism, vein repair, and nerve repair were significant predictive factors. In addition, in non-vein-repaired, blunt cut, or Ishikawa subzone II cases, digital nerve repair contributed significantly to promote the success rate relative to vein-repaired, crush-avulsion-type injury, and subzone I cases.

CONCLUSIONS

Vein repair, nerve repair, non-crush-avulsion injury, and surgeon's expertise and experience were the predictors for successful replantation. Intraoperative vein and nerve repair are recommended to improve the survival rate of fingertip replantation at the nail bed level.

CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Risk, III.

Fingertip Replantation: Technique Details and Review of the Evidence

Fingertip replantation is technically challenging, but in a motivated patient excellent aesthetic and functional outcomes can be achieved. Fingertip microanatomy by zone is described to facilitate the classification and treatment of these injuries. In this article, we outline our preferred techniques for fingertip replantation and review the current body of evidence surrounding indications, techniques, and outcomes while highlighting opportunities for future study.

Long-Term Outcomes of Successful Fingertip Replantation: A Follow-Up of at Least 10 Years

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the long-term outcome of successful fingertip replantations with more than 10 years of follow-up after surgery.

METHODS

A total of 34 successfully replanted digits in 31 patients with a mean period to follow-up of 16.5 years were included in this study. The main outcome measures were time to return to work, pain, cold intolerance, sensory recovery, nail deformity, grip strength, range of motion of the thumb interphalangeal or finger distal interphalangeal joint, fingertip atrophy, nonunion, bone shortening, use in activities of daily living, and patient satisfaction.

RESULTS

None of the patients reported chronic pain. No cold intolerance was experienced in 32 digits. Semmes-Weinstein monofilament testing showed recovery of protective sensation in 27 digits. The moving two-point discrimination test showed excellent or good recovery in 91 percent of the patients. Sensory recovery was satisfactory, and there was no significant difference regardless of nerve repair or injury type. Moderate to severe nail deformity was found in six digits. Fingertip atrophy was evaluated by comparing the volume of the replanted fingertip with the contralateral digit. The volume was 82 ± 17 percent of the contralateral normal side. There was no significant difference in the volume comparing the level of amputation, injury type, or incidence of postoperative vascular complication. Ninety-seven percent of the patients were satisfied with the results.

CONCLUSION

Long-term outcome of fingertip replantation more than 10 years after surgery was found to be favorable.

Reporting Outcomes and Outcome Measures in Digital Replantation: A Systematic Review

Introduction  There is a lack of consensus on what the critical outcomes in replantation are and how best to measure them. This review aims to identify all reported outcomes and respective outcome measures used in digital replantation. Materials and Methods  Randomized controlled trials, cohort studies, and single-arm observational studies of adults undergoing replantation with at least one well-described outcome or outcome measure were identified. Primary outcomes were classified into six domains, and outcome measures were classified into eight domains. The clinimetric properties were identified and reported. A total of 56 observational studies met the inclusion criteria. Results  In total, 29 continuous and 29 categorical outcomes were identified, and 87 scales and instruments were identified. The most frequently used outcomes were survival of replanted digit, sensation, and time in hospital. Outcomes and measures were most variable in domains of viability, quality of life, and motor function. Only eight measures used across these domains were validated and proven reliable. Conclusion  Lack of consensus creates an obstacle to reporting, understanding, and comparing the effectiveness of various replantation strategies.

Practical Tips to Improve Efficiency and Success in Upper Limb Replantation

LEARNING OBJECTIVES

After reading this article, participant should be able to: 1. Describe the technique of replantation for very distal amputation of the digit and salvage procedures for venous drainage. 2. Perform single-digit replantation after viewing the videos. 3. Recognize appropriate cases for joint salvage techniques in periarticular amputation at each joint of the digit and wrist. 4. Outline the methods of flexor and extensor tendon reconstruction in an avulsed amputation of the digit or thumb. 5. Understand the order of digital replantation and transpositional replantation for a restoration of pinch or grip in multiple-digit amputation.

SUMMARY

This article provides practical tips and caveats for the latest replantation surgical techniques for digit, hand, and upper extremity amputation. Four videos, clinical photographs, and drawings highlight important points of operative technique and outcomes of replantation.

Finger and thumb replantation: From biomechanics to practical surgical applications

Finger and thumb amputations, which are always dramatic injuries with major functional and psychological repercussions, remain a surgical challenge. This review on digit replantation develops the underlying biomechanical and surgical aspects as well as practical indications. The different stages from trauma to postoperative monitoring are described. We describe the steps to follow from theory to practice in order to optimize the surgical acts that must as effective possible in terms of management and decision-making efficiency. Indications recognized as standards such as thumb amputation, multi-digit amputations and distal amputations are detailed, as well as the more controversial ring finger replantations. The challenge of successful finger and thumb replantation lies in searching for the best functional and cosmetic outcome and not performing irrelevant microsurgical manipulations.

External bleeding versus dermal pocketing for distal digital replantation without venous anastomosis

Venous congestion in distal digital replantations is a common problem as suitable veins are not always available. We compared two methods of venous decongestion, external bleeding ( n = 15) and dermal pocketing ( n = 28) carried out when venous anastomosis was not possible. The findings of this small study suggest that neither method of venous decongestion is clearly better than the other. Level of evidence: IV.

Preliminary Study on Functional and Aesthetic Reconstruction by Using a Small Artery-only Free Medial Flap of the Second Toe for Fingertip Injuries

OBJECTIVES

This study was designed to introduce the feasibility of fingertip reconstruction by using a free medial flap of the second toe without vein anastomosis.

METHODS

In total, 8 patients with fingertip injuries were treated successfully with this method. Patients who underwent reconstruction from September 2016 to October 2017 in our hospital with an artery-only free medial flap transfer of the second toe for fingertip injuries were included, and patients who underwent additional procedures that may impact the postoperative results and were followed up for less than 6 months were excluded. Clinical trial registration: ChiCTR19000021883.

RESULTS

According to the Allen classification, five patients had Type 3 injuries, and three patients had Type 4 injuries. One arterial nerve and one digital nerve were repaired at the same time. No additional dissection was performed in either the donor or recipient site of the dorsal or volar vein. Postoperative venous congestion was monitored based on the color, temperature and the degree of tissue oxygen saturation. The flap size ranged from 1.20*1.0 cm2 to 1.80*1.0 cm2. The reconstruction time was 71.86 (SD 14.75) minutes. The two-point discrimination and the monofilament results were satisfying; cold intolerance did not appear in five patients, and the other three patients had cold intolerance with grades of 4, 12 and 26, which were considered satisfactory. Moreover, leech therapy, continuous bleeding and needle sutures were not utilized in any cases.

CONCLUSIONS

Reconstruction with a small artery-only free medial flap transfer of the second toe led to satisfactory sensory and motor function in the selected patients with fingertip injuries.

Multiple venous anastomoses decrease the need for intensive postoperative management in tamai zone I replantations

BACKGROUND

Venous anastomosis is an important component of digital replantation, but is not always feasible, as some cases require external bleeding to treat venous congestion in the replanted tissue. In the present study, we evaluated the relationship between the number of vein anastomoses and the survival rate of Tamai zone I replantations.

METHODS

A retrospective review was performed of all patients who underwent replantation of a fingertip amputation between 2014 and 2016. Patient charts were reviewed for demographic information, the mechanism of injury, the number of venous anastomoses, and the use of anticoagulation, external bleeding, and/or leeches. The cohort was divided into 3 groups depending on the number of venous anastomoses: no veins (group 1), a single vein (group 2), and 2 or more veins (group 3). Survival rates and external bleeding rates were analyzed across the groups.

RESULTS

The review identified 143 fingertip replantations among 134 patients. The overall survival rate was 94% (135 of 143). Failures were due equally to venous complications (n=4, 50%) and to arterial complications (n=4, 50%). Our analysis did not identify any correlation between the number of veins anastomosed and the replant survival rate (P=0.689). However, a greater number of anastomoses was associated with a significantly lower frequency of external bleeding (P=0.017).

CONCLUSIONS

The number of venous anastomoses was not correlated with the survival rate. However, a greater number of venous anastomoses was associated with a decreased need for external bleeding, corresponding to a significant decrease in the need for postoperative monitoring and leech therapy.

Traumatic Finger Amputation Treatment Preference among Hand Surgeons in the United States and Japan

BACKGROUND

Large geographic differences in procedure utilization draw into question its appropriate use. In Japan, replantation is frequent for even very distal finger amputations. In the United States, revision amputation is far more common. There has been no detailed investigation into the drivers of these differences.

METHODS

The authors created a survey to assess experience with replantation, estimates of physical and functional outcomes, attitudes toward amputees, and preferences in several injury scenarios. The survey was distributed to members of the Finger Replantation and Amputation Multicenter Study and to hand surgeons making podium presentations at the Thirty-Second Annual Meeting of the Central Japanese Society for Surgery of the Hand.

RESULTS

One hundred percent of both groups responded. There were no significant differences in surgeon experience. Japanese surgeons were significantly more likely to recommend replantation in all scenarios, despite 62 percent ranking function 6 months after replantation as "poor." Japanese surgeons also rated the appearance of a hand with an amputated finger significantly poorer. Finally, Japanese surgeons were significantly more likely to report stigmatization against finger amputees.

CONCLUSIONS

There is no study with a high level of evidence comparing outcomes following replantation and revision amputation. The lack of evidence results in surgeons basing recommendations on personal preference. In this case, Japanese surgeons preferred replantation despite agreeing that functional outcomes were suboptimal. This may be because of Japanese cultural beliefs. Comparative effectiveness research, such as that planned by the Finger Replantation and Amputation Multicenter Study, can provide evidence toward the appropriate use of replantation.

Controlled continuous systemic heparinization increases success rate of artery-only anastomosis replantation in single distal digit amputation: A retrospective cohort study

Replantation is a prime indication for distal digital amputation, as it helps restore hand aesthetics and functions; however, venous anastomosis is often not feasible. Previous studies used systemic anticoagulation in distal digital artery only anastomosis replantation surgery to improve replantation success rate, however, which yielded limited level of clinical evidence. This study aimed to compare controlled continuous heparinization (CCH) and intermittent bolus heparinization (IBH) for surgical outcome and clinical variables after single distal digital artery only anastomosis replantation surgery.A single-institution, retrospective cohort study was performed. Out of 324 patients who underwent digital replantation surgery, we focused the study for the Zone I and II single distal digital amputation patients excluding confounding factors. Sixty-one patients were included in this study and underwent artery-only anastomosis replantation surgery with postoperative CCH (34 patients) or IBH (27 patients) protocols. The CCH group targeted activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) at 51 to 70 seconds, monitoring aPTT levels every eight hours and administering 100 mg of aspirin per day. The IBH group received 300 mg of aspirin per day and underwent IBH (12,500 U). Both groups received intravenous prostaglandin E1 drips (10 μg). To verify the factors affecting the success rate of the heparin protocol, patient factors, clinical factors, and operative factors were extracted from the medical records. Statistical analysis with inverse probability of treatment weights propensity score methods compared treatment outcomes and clinical variables.The CCH group's replantation success rate was higher (91.17% vs 59.25%), and the transfusion rate was increased (P = 0.032). However, the significant decrease in hemoglobin levels (>15%) did not differ between the groups (P = 0.108). Multivariable logistic regression analysis with potent univariate variables (P < .10) revealed that CCH was a statistically significant variable in replantation success rate (P = 0.004). Neither the major bleeding complications nor the significant decrease in patients' platelet levels were observed in both groups.Our study suggests that CCH after artery-only anastomosis replantation surgery in Zone I and II distal digital replantation is a safe method to improve the replantation success rate and may provide a guideline for use of the anticoagulation method following artery-only anastomosis distal digital replantation surgery.

Rehabilitation after successful finger replantation

OBJECTIVE:

The aim of the present study was to assess results of rehabilitation of patients after finger replantation.

METHODS:

The study examined 160 fingers amputated and replanted at various levels between 2000 and 2013 at the clinic. Mean patient age was 29.4 years. Mean follow-up time was 23 months. Rehabilitation of fingers began between postoperative fourth and eighth week and continued until the 24th week. Range of motion of affected hand, return to daily activities, aesthetic appearance, and patient satisfaction were assessed according to Tamai criteria.

RESULTS:

Functional results according to Tamai criteria were perfect in 36 patients, good in 54 patients, average in 27 patients, and poor in 18 patients.

CONCLUSION:

Post-operative rehabilitation of replanted fingers should begin as soon as possible. During the rehabilitation period, physiotherapist, surgeon, and patient must work in close cooperation. Functional results of patients who adjust to the rehabilitation program, home practice, and splint usage are better.

The Importance of Hand Appearance as a Patient-Reported Outcome in Hand Surgery

Hand appearance is meaningful to patients because hands are an essential part of human interactions, communication, and social integration. Recent literature indicates that hand aesthetics is an important, measurable patient-reported outcome. In hand surgery, several outcome instruments exist that accurately measure functional outcomes, but aesthetics is often overlooked or imprecisely measured. This makes comparison of disease burden and effectiveness of therapies, as they pertain to aesthetics, difficult. This special topic article outlines the aesthetic features of the hand, how literature is evaluating the appearance of the hand in outcomes research, and proposes a novel approach to assessing hand aesthetics.

Economic analysis of revision amputation and replantation treatment of finger amputation injuries

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to perform a cost-utility analysis to compare revision amputation and replantation treatment of finger amputation injuries across a spectrum of injury scenarios.

METHODS

The study was conducted from the societal perspective. Decision tree models were created for the reference case (two-finger amputation injury) and seven additional injury scenarios for comparison. Inputs included cost, quality of life, and probability of each health state. A Web-based time trade-off survey was created to determine quality-adjusted life-years for health states; 685 nationally representative adult community members were invited to participate in the survey. Overall cost and quality-adjusted life-years for revision amputation and replantation were calculated for each decision tree. An incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was calculated if a treatment was more costly but more effective.

RESULTS

The authors had a 64 percent response rate (n = 437). Replantation treatment had greater costs and quality-adjusted life-years compared with revision amputation in all injury scenarios. Replantation of single-digit injuries had the highest incremental cost-effectiveness ratio ($136,400 per quality-adjusted life-year gained). Replantation of three- and four-digit amputation injuries had relatively low cost-to-benefit ratios ($27,100 and $23,800 per quality-adjusted life-year, respectively). Replantation for distal thumb amputation had a relatively low incremental cost-effectiveness ratio ($26,300 per quality-adjusted life-year) compared with replantation of nonthumb distal amputations ($60,200 per quality-adjusted life-year).

CONCLUSIONS

The relative cost per quality-adjusted life-year gained with replantation treatment varied greatly among the injury scenarios. Situations in which indications for replantation are debated had higher cost per quality-adjusted life-year gained. This study highlights variability in value for replantation among different injury scenarios.

Secondary surgeries after digital replantations: a case series

We evaluated the injuries, survival rats, and secondary surgeries of patients who had undergone finger replantation or revascularization between October 2005 and July 2010. The 70 digits came from 43 patients (average age, 46 years; range, 19 to 78 years; 37 men). Overall replantation survival rate was 94%; 93% (27/29) for complete amputations and 95% (39/41) for near-amputations. In all, 39 digits from 21 patients required 48 secondary surgeries; skin grafts, tenolysis, joint fusion, bone graft, osteotomy, and web plasty. The more proximal or more severe the injuries, the higher the need of secondary surgeries. The most common surgery soon after replantation was skin coverage; the most common after two months was tendon surgery. Primary repair must be adequate to restore the function and appearance of amputated digits; however, the possible need for secondary surgeries must be kept in mind to avoid restricting the options for secondary procedures.

Fingertip reconstruction using free toe tissue transfer without venous anastomosis

BACKGROUND

This study was designed to introduce the feasibility of toe tissue transfer without venous outflow for fingertip reconstruction.

METHODS

Five cases of fingertip defects were treated successfully with this method. Four cases were traumatic fingertip defects, and one case was a hook-nail deformity. The lateral pulp of a great toe or medioinferior portion of a second toe was used as the donor site. An arterial pedicle was dissected only within the digit and anastomosis was performed within 2 cm around the defect margin. The digital nerve was repaired simultaneously. No additional dissection of the dorsal or volar pulp vein was performed in either the donor or recipient sites. Other surgical procedures were performed following conventional techniques. Postoperative venous congestion was monitored with pulp temperature, color, and degree of tissue oxygen saturation. Venous congestion was decompressed with a needle-puncture method intermittently, but did not require continuous external bleeding for salvage.

RESULTS

Venous congestion was observed in all the flaps, but improved within 3 or 4 days postoperatively. The flap size was from 1.5×1.5 cm(2) to 2.0×3.0 cm(2). The mean surgical time was 2 hours and 20 minutes. A needle puncture was carried out every 2 hours during the first postoperative day, and then every 4 hours thereafter. The amount of blood loss during each puncture procedure was less than 0.2 mL. In the long-term follow-up, no flap atrophy was observed.

CONCLUSIONS

When used properly, the free toe tissue transfer without venous anastomosis method can be a treatment option for small defects on the fingertip area.

A systematic review of the outcomes of replantation of distal digital amputation

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to conduct a systematic review of the English literature on replantation of distal digital amputations to provide the best evidence of survival rates and functional outcomes.

METHODS

A MEDLINE search using "digit," "finger," "thumb," and "replantation" as keywords and limited to humans and English-language articles identified 1297 studies. Studies were included in the review if they (1) present primary data, (2) report five or more single or multiple distal replantations, and (3) present survival rates. Additional data extracted from the studies meeting the inclusion criteria included demographic information, nature and level of amputation, venous outflow technique, nerve repair, recovery of sensibility, range of motion, return to work, and complications.

RESULTS

Thirty studies representing 2273 distal replantations met the inclusion criteria. The mean survival rate was 86 percent. There was no difference in survival between zone I and zone II replantations (Tamai classification). There was a significant difference in survival between replantation of clean-cut versus the more crushed amputations (crush-cut and crush-avulsion). The repair of a vein improved survival in both zone I and zone II replantation. The mean two-point discrimination was 7 mm (n = 220), and 98 percent returned to work (n = 98). Complications included pulp atrophy in 14 percent of patients (n = 639) and nail deformity in 23 percent (n = 653).

CONCLUSIONS

The common perception that distal replantation is associated with little functional gain is not based on scientific evidence. This systematic review showed a high success rate and good functional outcomes following distal digital replantation.

CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic, IV.

Replantation surgery

The current concepts of replantation surgery, a procedure that has been practiced for half a century, can be discussed in terms of patients' demands and expectations, present indications for the procedure, available evidence that influences decision making, and technical refinements practiced to produce better outcomes.

Fingertip replantation at or beyond the nail base in children

Although success of digital replantations in children has been reported by many authors, the very distal fingertip replantation remains technically demanding. The aim of this article is to review our experience with fingertip replantations at or distal to the nail base in pediatric patients and evaluate the clinical outcomes. From October 2000 to May 2007, 12 pediatric fingertips amputated at or distal to the nail base were replanted. Only one artery was anastomosed for revascularization with or without nerve repair; vein drainage was provided by the controlled bleeding technique. Eleven of the 12 replants (91%) survived; one replant of crushed digit failed. An average of 26 month (range, 6 to 36 months) follow-up revealed excellent restoration of finger motion and appearance. The regained static 2-point discrimination (S2PD) sensation was from 3.2 to 5.0 mm (mean, 4.2 mm). Both the parents and the children were satisfied with the final results. In conclusion, fingertip replantation in children allows good functional and esthetical recovery and should be attempted if technically feasible.

Standardized protocol for artery-only fingertip replantation

PURPOSE

Artery-only fingertip replantation can be reliable if low-resistance flow through the replant is maintained until venous outflow is restored naturally. Injuring the tip of the replant to promote ongoing bleeding augmented with anticoagulation usually accomplishes this; however, such management results in prolonged hospitalization. In this study, we analyzed the outcomes of artery-only fingertip replantation using a standardized postoperative protocol consisting of dextran-40, heparin, and leech therapy.

METHODS

Between 2001 and 2008, we performed 19 artery-only fingertip replants for 17 patients. All patients had the replanted nail plate removed and received intravenous dextran-40, heparin, and aspirin to promote fingertip bleeding and vascular outflow. Anticoagulation was titrated to promote a controlled bleed until physiologic venous outflow was restored by neovascularization. We used medicinal leeches and mechanical heparin scrubbing for acute decongestion. By postoperative day 6, bleeding was no longer promoted. We initiated fluorescent dye perfusion studies to assess circulatory competence and direct further anticoagulant intervention if necessary. The absence of bleeding associated with an initial rise followed by an appropriate fall in fluorescent dye concentration would trigger a weaning of anticoagulation.

RESULTS

All of the 19 replants survived. The average length of hospital stay was 9 days (range, 7-17 d). Eleven patients received blood transfusions. The average transfusion was 1.8 units (range, 0-9 units). All patients were happy with the decision to replant, and the cosmetic result.

CONCLUSIONS

A protocol that promotes temporary, controlled bleeding from the fingertip is protective of artery-only replants distal to the distal interphalangeal joint until physiologic venous outflow is restored. The protocol described is both safe and reliable. The patient should be informed that such replant attempts may result in the need for transfusions and extended hospital stays, factors that can help the physician and patient decide whether to proceed with replantation.

TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic IV.

Vein grafting in fingertip replantations

In this retrospective study, the survival rates of fingertip replantation with and without vein grafting were evaluated along with their postoperative functional and cosmetic results. One hundred twenty-one-fingertip amputations were performed in 103 patients between September 2002 and July 2007. Thirty-four amputated fingertips were replanted without vein grafting, while 87 amputated fingertips were replanted with vein grafting for arterial and/or venous repairs. The overall survival rates of the replantations with and without vein grafting were 90% (78/87) and 85% (29/34), respectively. The survival rates were 88% (36/41) with venous repair, 93% (25/27) with arterial repair, and 89% (17/19) with both. Nineteen patients without vein grafting and 48 patients with vein grafting had a follow-up period of more than one year. Good cosmetic and functional outcomes were observed in both groups of patients. The results show that vein grafting is a reliable technique in fingertip replantations, showing no significant difference (P > 0.05) in survival between those with and without vein grafting. Furthermore, no significant difference (P > 0.05) in survival was found between cases with vein grafts for arterial and/or venous repairs. In fingertip replantations with vein grafting, favorable functional and esthetic results can be achieved without sacrificing replantation survival.

Sensory outcome of fingertip replantations without nerve repair

The sensory recovery outcomes of fingertip replantations without nerve repair were retrospectively studied. Between 2000 and 2006, 112 fingertip replantations with only arterial repair were carried out in 98 patients. About 76 of the replants survived totally, with a success rate of 67.8%. Evaluation of sensory recovery was possible in 31 patients (38 replantations). Sensory evaluation was made with Semmes-Weinstein, static and dynamic two-point discrimination, and vibration sense tests. Fingertip atrophy, nail deformities, and return to work were also evaluated. According to the Semmes-Weinstein test, 29.0% (11/38) of the fingers had normal sense, 60.5% (23/38) had diminished light touch, 7.9% (3/38) had diminished protective sensation, and 2.6% (1/38) had loss of protective sensation. Mean static and dynamic two-point discriminations were 7.2 mm (3-11 mm), and 4.60 mm (3-6 mm), respectively. Vibratory testing revealed increased vibration in 42.1% of the fingers, decreased vibration in 36.8%, and equal vibration when compared with the non-injured fingers in 21.1%. Atrophy was present in 14 (36.8%) fingers and negatively affected the results. Nail deformities, cold intolerance, return to work, and the effect of sensory education were investigated. Comparison of crush and clean cut injuries did not yield any significant difference in any of the parameters. Patients who received sensory education had significantly better results in sensory testing. The results were classified as excellent, good, and poor based on results of two-point discrimination tests. The outcome was excellent in 18 fingers and good in 20 fingers. Overall, satisfactory sensory recovery was achieved in fingertip replantations without nerve repair.

Replantation of amputated finger composite tissues with microvascular anastomosis

Replantation of the partial amputated finger or the composite tissue in finger would achieve better functional and esthetic results than any reconstructive procedure. In this article, we report the results of microsurgical partial finger or composite tissue replantation at different anatomic sites of 24 fingers in 21 patients. Microvascular anastomosis was performed in all cases of replantation. For the digital palmar and lateral composite tissue defects, the proper palmar digital artery and volar or dorsal subcutaneous veins were repaired by end-to-end anastomoses. For the digital dorsal defects, the blood supply was reestablished by arterialization of a dorsal central vein in the replanted part with one of the proper palmar digital arteries. The average follow-up period was 12.3 months. Twenty-two of 24 fingers survived completely with good functional and esthetic results. Two replantations failed because of vascular complications. In conclusion, if the vascular vessels in amputations of partial finger and composite tissue of finger are suitable for anastomosis, a successful replantation of these parts with excellent functional and esthetic recovery can be achieved.

Soft-tissue injuries of the fingertip: methods of evaluation and treatment. An algorithmic approach

LEARNING OBJECTIVES

After studying this article, the participant should be able to: 1. Understand the anatomy of the fingertip. 2. Describe the methods of evaluating fingertip injuries. 3. Discuss reconstructive options for various tip injuries.

SUMMARY

The fingertip is the most commonly injured part of the hand, and therefore fingertip injuries are among the most frequent injuries that plastic surgeons are asked to treat. Although microsurgical techniques have enabled replantation of even very distal tip amputations, it is relatively uncommon that a distal tip injury will be appropriate for replantation. In the event that replantation is not pursued, options for distal tip soft-tissue reconstruction must be considered. This review presents a straightforward method for evaluating fingertip injuries and provides an algorithm for fingertip reconstruction.

Digital replantation

The final judgment of whether to replant may not be determined until after microscopic inspection of vessels and nerves is complete. Once committed, it is ultimately the attention to detail that will determine function; bone shortening and rigid fixation, multiple strand flexor tendon repair, and quality, meticulous repair of the extensor mechanism to permit early movement, periosteal approximation to aid gliding, radical debridement of damaged vessels and primary skin closure.

Fingertip injuries

BACKGROUND

Fingertip injuries are extremely common. Out of the various available reconstructive options, one needs to select an option which achieves a painless fingertip with durable and sensate skin cover. The present analysis was conducted to evaluate the management and outcome of fingertip injuries.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This is a retrospective study of 150 cases of fingertip Injuries of patients aged six to 65 years managed over a period of two years. Various reconstructive options were considered for the fingertip lesions greater than or equal to 1 cm(2). The total duration of treatment varied from two to six weeks with follow-up from two months to one year.

RESULTS

The results showed preservation of finger length and contour, retention of sensation and healing without significant complication.

CONCLUSION

The treatment needs to be individualized and all possible techniques of reconstruction must be known to achieve optimal recovery.