Mechanisms of direct peritoneal resuscitation-mediated splanchnic hyperperfusion following hemorrhagic shock

TRAUMA AND THE ENTEROCYTE: DISTURBANCE OF COMMUNICATION AND DELINEATION

ABSTRACT

The enterocyte as major building stone of the intestinal barrier plays a central role in maintaining cellular homeostasis and mediating host-environment interactions. Trauma, whether direct or remote, disrupts enterocyte function through complex mechanisms including impaired oxygen delivery, disturbed intercellular communication, and compromised nutrient uptake and metabolite clearance. These changes may lead to barrier dysfunction and altered repair mechanisms, facilitating systemic inflammation and remote organ injury. The failure of communication pathways-both within enterocytes and across epithelial networks-undermines coordinated responses to injury. Understanding these multifaceted perturbations reveals the enterocyte not merely as a passive victim but as an active participant in trauma-induced pathology. Emerging therapeutic strategies focus on enhancing mucosal repair via sealing agents, promoting epithelial proliferation, and restoring metabolic and signaling homeostasis. This review delineates the dynamic response of the enterocyte to trauma, highlighting opportunities for targeted interventions aimed at restoring intestinal integrity and function.

Direct Peritoneal Resuscitation for Trauma

Direct peritoneal resuscitation (DPR) has been found to be a useful adjunct in the management of critically ill trauma patients. DPR is performed following damage control surgery by leaving a surgical drain in the mesentery, placing a temporary abdominal closure, and postoperatively running peritoneal dialysis solution through the surgical drain with removal through the temporary closure. In the original animal models, the peritoneal dialysate infusion was found to augment visceral microcirculatory blood flow reducing the ischemic insult that occurs following hemorrhagic shock. DPR was also found to minimize the aberrant immune response that occurs secondary to shock and contributes to multisystem organ dysfunction. In the subsequent human trials, performing DPR had significant effects in several key categories. Traumatically injured patients who received DPR had a significantly shorter time to definitive fascial closure, had a higher likelihood of achieving primary fascial closure, and experienced fewer abdominal complications. The use of DPR has been further expanded as a useful adjunct for emergency general surgery patients and in the pretransplant care of human cadaver organ donors.

Direct Peritoneal Resuscitation in Trauma Patients Results in Similar Rates of Intra-Abdominal Complications

Background: Trauma patients undergoing damage control surgery (DCS) have a propensity for complicated abdominal closures and intra-abdominal complications. Studies show that management of open abdomens with direct peritoneal resuscitation (DPR) reduces intra-abdominal complications and accelerates abdominal closure. This novel study compares intra-abdominal complication rates and the effect of DPR initiation in patients who received DPR and those who did not. Patients and Methods: A retrospective chart review was performed on 120 patients who underwent DCS. Fifty patients were identified as DCS with DPR, and matched to 70 controls by gender, race, age, body mass index (BMI), past medical history, mechanism of trauma, and injury severity score. Results: The two groups of patients, those without DPR (-DPR) and those with DPR (+DPR), were similar in their characteristics. The +DPR group was more likely to have a mesh closure than the -DPR (14% and 3%; p = 0.022). The +DPR group took longer to have a final closure (3.5 ± 2.6 days vs. 2.5 ± 1.8; p = 0.020). Infection complications and mechanical failure of the closure technique were similar among the two groups. Timing of DPR initiation had no effect on closure type but did statistically increase the number of days to closure (initiation at first operation 2.8 ± 1.8 days vs. initiation at subsequent operations 6.0 ± 3.3 days; p ≤ 0.001). Conclusions: The use of DPR did not result in different outcomes in trauma patients. Therefore, traditional resuscitative measures for DCS may not be inferior to DCS with DPR. When choosing to use DPR, initiating it at the first operation could reduce the number of days to closure.

Plasma resuscitation with adjunctive peritoneal resuscitation reduces ischemia-induced intestinal barrier breakdown following hemorrhagic shock

INTRODUCTION

Hemorrhagic shock (HS) and resuscitation (RES) cause ischemia-induced intestinal permeability due to intestinal barrier breakdown, damage to the endothelium, and tight junction (TJ) complex disruption between enterocytes. The effect of hemostatic RES with blood products on this phenomenon is unknown. Previously, we showed that fresh frozen plasma (FFP) RES, with or without directed peritoneal resuscitation (DPR) improved blood flow and alleviated organ injury and enterocyte damage following HS/RES. We hypothesized that FFP might decrease TJ injury and attenuate ischemia-induced intestinal permeability following HS/RES.

METHODS

Sprague-Dawley rats were randomly assigned to groups (n = 8): sham; crystalloid resuscitation (CR) (HS of 40% mean arterial pressure for 60 minutes) and CR (shed blood plus two volumes of CR); CR and DPR (intraperitoneal 2.5% peritoneal dialysis fluid); FFP (shed blood plus one volume of FFP); and FFP and DPR (intraperitoneal dialysis fluid plus two volumes of FFP). Fluorescein isothiocyanate-dextran (molecular weight, 4 kDa; FD4) was instilled into the gastrointestinal tract before hemorrhage; FD4 was measured by UV spectrometry at various time points. Plasma syndecan-1 and ileum tissue TJ proteins were measured using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Immunofluorescence was used to visualize claudin-4 concentrations at 4 hours following HS/RES.

RESULTS

Following HS, FFP attenuated FD4 leak across the intestine at all time points compared with CR and DPR alone. This response was significantly improved with the adjunctive DPR at 3 and 4 hours post-RES (p < 0.05). Resuscitation with FFP-DPR increased intestinal tissue concentrations of TJ proteins and decreased plasma syndecan-1. Immunofluorescence demonstrated decreased mobilization of claudin-4 in both FFP and FFP-DPR groups.

CONCLUSION

Fresh frozen plasma-based RES improves intestinal TJ and endothelial integrity. The addition of DPR can further stabilize TJs and attenuate intestinal permeability. Combination therapy with DPR and FFP to mitigate intestinal barrier breakdown following shock could be a novel method of reducing ischemia-induced intestinal permeability and systemic inflammation after trauma.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Prognostic/Epidemiologic, Level III.

Plasma resuscitation with adjunctive peritoneal resuscitation reduces ischemic intestinal injury following hemorrhagic shock

INTRODUCTION

Impaired intestinal microvascular perfusion following resuscitated hemorrhagic shock (HS) leads to ischemia-reperfusion injury, microvascular dysfunction, and intestinal epithelial injury, which contribute to the development of multiple organ dysfunction syndrome in some trauma patients. Restoration of central hemodynamics with traditional methods alone often fails to fully restore microvascular perfusion and does not protect against ischemia-reperfusion injury. We hypothesized that resuscitation (RES) with fresh frozen plasma (FFP) alone or combined with direct peritoneal resuscitation (DPR) with 2.5% Delflex solution might improve blood flow and decrease intestinal injury compared with conventional RES or RES with DPR alone.

METHODS

Sprague-Dawley rats underwent HS (40% mean arterial pressure) for 60 minutes and were randomly assigned to a RES group (n = 8): sham, HS-crystalloid resuscitation (CR) (shed blood + two volumes CR), HS-CR-DPR (intraperitoneal 2.5% peritoneal dialysis fluid), HS-FFP (shed blood + two volumes FFP), and HS-DPR-FFP (intraperitoneal dialysis fluid + two volumes FFP). Laser Doppler flowmeter evaluation of the ileum, serum samples for fatty acid binding protein enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, and hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining were used to assess intestinal injury and blood flow. p Values of <0.05 were considered significant.

RESULTS

Following HS, the addition of DPR to either RES modality improved intestinal blood flow. Four hours after resuscitated HS, FABP-2 (intestinal) and FABP-6 (ileal) were elevated in the CR group but reduced in the FFP and DPR groups. The H&E staining demonstrated disrupted intestinal villi in the FFP and CR groups, most significantly in the CR group. Combination therapy with FFP and DPR demonstrated negligible cellular injury in H&E graded samples and a significant reduction in fatty acid binding protein levels.

CONCLUSION

Hemorrhagic shock leads to ischemic-reperfusion injury of the intestine, and both FFP and DPR alone attenuated intestinal damage; combination FFP-DPR therapy alleviated most signs of organ injury. Resuscitation with FFP-DPR to restore intestinal blood flow following shock could be an essential method of reducing morbidity and mortality after trauma.

Direct Peritoneal Resuscitation: A Novel Adjunct to Damage Control Laparotomy

Direct peritoneal resuscitation is a validated resuscitation strategy for patients undergoing damage control surgery for hemorrhage, sepsis, or abdominal compartment syndrome with open abdomen and planned reexploration after a period of resuscitation in the intensive care unit. Direct peritoneal resuscitation can decrease visceral edema, normalize body water ratios, accelerate primary abdominal wall closure after damage control surgery, and prevent complications associated with open abdomen. This review article describes the physiological benefits of direct peritoneal resuscitation, how this technique fits within management priorities for the patient in shock, and procedural components in the care of open abdomen surgical patients receiving direct peritoneal resuscitation. Strategies for successful implementation of a novel multidisciplinary intervention in critical care practice are explored.

Hemorrhagic Shock and the Microvasculature

The microvasculature plays a central role in the pathophysiology of hemorrhagic shock and is also involved in arguably all therapeutic attempts to reverse or minimize the adverse consequences of shock. Microvascular studies specific to hemorrhagic shock were reviewed and broadly grouped depending on whether data were obtained on animal or human subjects. Dedicated sections were assigned to microcirculatory changes in specific organs, and major categories of pathophysiological alterations and mechanisms such as oxygen distribution, ischemia, inflammation, glycocalyx changes, vasomotion, endothelial dysfunction, and coagulopathy as well as biomarkers and some therapeutic strategies. Innovative experimental methods were also reviewed for quantitative microcirculatory assessment as it pertains to changes during hemorrhagic shock. The text and figures include representative quantitative microvascular data obtained in various organs and tissues such as skin, muscle, lung, liver, brain, heart, kidney, pancreas, intestines, and mesentery from various species including mice, rats, hamsters, sheep, swine, bats, and humans. Based on reviewed findings, a new integrative conceptual model is presented that includes about 100 systemic and local factors linked to microvessels in hemorrhagic shock. The combination of systemic measures with the understanding of these processes at the microvascular level is fundamental to further develop targeted and personalized interventions that will reduce tissue injury, organ dysfunction, and ultimately mortality due to hemorrhagic shock. Published 2018. Compr Physiol 8:61-101, 2018.

Functional vascular anatomy of the peritoneum in health and disease

The peritoneum consists of a layer of mesothelial cells on a connective tissue base which is perfused with circulatory and lymphatic vessels. Total effective blood flow to the human peritoneum is estimated between 60 and 100 mL/min, representing 1-2 % of the cardiac outflow. The parietal peritoneum accounts for about 30 % of the peritoneal surface (anterior abdominal wall 4 %) and is vascularized from the circumflex, iliac, lumbar, intercostal, and epigastric arteries, giving rise to a quadrangular network of large, parallel blood vessels and their perpendicular offshoots. Parietal vessels drain into the inferior vena cava. The visceral peritoneum accounts for 70 % of the peritoneal surface and derives its blood supply from the three major arteries that supply the splanchnic organs, celiac and superior and inferior mesenteric. These vessels give rise to smaller arteries that anastomose extensively. The visceral peritoneum drains into the portal vein. Drugs absorbed are subject to first-pass hepatic metabolism. Peritoneal inflammation and cancer invasion induce neoangiogenesis, leading to the development of an important microvascular network. Anatomy of neovessels is abnormal and characterized by large size, varying diameter, convolution and blood extravasation. Neovessels have a defective ultrastructure: formation of large "mother vessels" requires degradation of venular and capillary basement membranes. Mother vessels give birth to numerous "daughter vessels". Diffuse neoangiogenesis can be observed before appearance of macroscopic peritoneal metastasis. Multiplication of the peritoneal capillary surface by neoangiogenesis surface increases the part of cardiac outflow directed to the peritoneum.

Association Between MC-2 Peptide and Hepatic Perfusion and Liver Injury Following Resuscitated Hemorrhagic Shock

IMPORTANCE

Hemorrhagic shock (HS) due to trauma remains a major cause of morbidity and mortality in the United States, despite continuing progression of advanced life support and treatment. Trauma is the third most common cause of death worldwide and is the leading cause of death in the 1- to 44-year-old age group. Hemorrhagic shock often progresses to multiple organ failure despite conventional resuscitation (CR) that restores central hemodynamics.

OBJECTIVE

To examine whether MC-2 would bind glycosaminoglycans to decrease proinflammatory cytokines' influence in the liver, minimize organ edema, prevent liver injury, and improve hepatic perfusion. MC-2, a synthetic octapeptide derived from the heparin-binding domain of murine interferon gamma (IFN-γ), binds glycosaminoglycans to modulate serum and interstitial cytokine levels and activity.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

A controlled laboratory study of 3y male Sprague-Dawley rats that were randomized to 4 groups of 8 each: sham, sham+MC-2 (50 mg/kg), HS/CR, or HS/CR+MC-2 (HS = 40% of baseline mean arterial pressure for 60 minutes; CR = return of shed blood and 2 volumes of saline). The study began in March, 2013.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

Effective hepatic blood flow (EHBF) by galactose clearance, wet-dry weights, cytokines, histopathology, complete metabolic panel, and complete blood cell count were performed at 4 hours after CR.

RESULTS

MC-2 partially reversed the HS/CR-induced hepatic hypoperfusion at 3 and 4 hours postresuscitation compared with HS/CR alone. Effective hepatic blood flow decreased during the HS period from a mean (SD) of 7.4 (0.3) mL/min/100 g and 7.5 (0.5) mL/min/100g at baseline to 3.7 (0.4) mL/min/100g and 5.9 (0.5) mL/min/100g for the HS/CR and HS/CR+MC-2 groups, respectively (P <.05). Effective hepatic blood flow remained constant in the sham groups throughout the experimental protocol. Organ edema was increased in the ileum and liver in the HS/CR vs sham group, and MC-2 decreased edema in the ileum vs the HS/CR group. MC-2 in HS also decreased levels of alanine aminotransferase, zonula occludens-1, and interleukin-1β compared with HS/CR alone.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

MC-2 was associated with decreased liver injury, enhanced effective hepatic blood flow, decreased cytokines, and prevention of edema formation in the ileum when administered with CR following HS. These data suggest that the MC-2 peptide could be a potential therapeutic approach to target cytokine and chemokine interactions, which might limit multiple organ failure and decrease mortality in hemorrhagic shock.

Removal of inflammatory ascites is associated with dynamic modification of local and systemic inflammation along with prevention of acute lung injury: in vivo and in silico studies

BACKGROUND

Sepsis-induced inflammation in the gut/peritoneal compartment occurs early in sepsis and can lead to acute lung injury (ALI). We have suggested that inflammatory ascites drives the pathogenesis of ALI and that removal of ascites with an abdominal wound vacuum prevents ALI. We hypothesized that the time- and compartment-dependent changes in inflammation that determine this process can be discerned using principal component analysis (PCA) and Dynamic Bayesian Network (DBN) inference.

METHODS

To test this hypothesis, data from a previous study were analyzed using PCA and DBN. In that study, two groups of anesthetized, ventilated pigs were subjected to experimental sepsis via intestinal ischemia/reperfusion and placement of a peritoneal fecal clot. The control group (n = 6) had the abdomen opened at 12 h after injury (T12) with attachment of a passive drain. The peritoneal suction treatment (PST) group (n = 6) was treated in an identical fashion except that a vacuum was applied to the peritoneal cavity at T12 to remove ascites and maintained until T48. Multiple inflammatory mediators were measured in ascites and plasma and related to lung function (PaO2/FIO2 ratio and oxygen index) using PCA and DBN.

RESULTS

Peritoneal suction treatment prevented ALI based on lung histopathology, whereas control animals developed ALI. Principal component analysis revealed that local to the insult (i.e., ascites), primary proinflammatory cytokines play a decreased role in the overall response in the treatment group as compared with control. In both groups, multiple, nested positive feedback loops were inferred from DBN, which included interrelated roles for bacterial endotoxin, interleukin 6, transforming growth factor β1, C-reactive protein, PaO2/FIO2 ratio, and oxygen index. von Willebrand factor was an output in control, but not PST, ascites.

CONCLUSIONS

These combined in vivo and in silico studies suggest that in this clinically realistic paradigm of sepsis, endotoxin drives the inflammatory response in the ascites, interplaying with lung dysfunction in a feed-forward loop that exacerbates inflammation and leads to endothelial dysfunction, systemic spillover, and ALI; PST partially modifies this process.

Efficacy and safety of active negative pressure peritoneal therapy for reducing the systemic inflammatory response after damage control laparotomy (the Intra-peritoneal Vacuum Trial): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

Background

Damage control laparotomy, or abbreviated initial laparotomy followed by temporary abdominal closure (TAC), intensive care unit resuscitation, and planned re-laparotomy, is frequently used to manage intra-abdominal bleeding and contamination among critically ill or injured adults. Animal data suggest that TAC techniques that employ negative pressure to the peritoneal cavity may reduce the systemic inflammatory response and associated organ injury. The primary objective of this study is to determine if use of a TAC dressing that affords active negative pressure peritoneal therapy, the ABThera Open Abdomen Negative Pressure Therapy System, reduces the extent of the systemic inflammatory response after damage control laparotomy for intra-abdominal sepsis or injury as compared to a commonly used TAC method that provides potentially less efficient peritoneal negative pressure, the Barker’s vacuum pack.

Methods/Design

The Intra-peritoneal Vacuum Trial will be a single-center, randomized controlled trial. Adults will be intraoperatively allocated to TAC with either the ABThera or Barker’s vacuum pack after the decision has been made by the attending surgeon to perform a damage control laparotomy. The study will use variable block size randomization. On study days 1, 2, 3, 7, and 28, blood will be collected. Whenever possible, peritoneal fluid will also be collected at these time points from the patient’s abdomen or TAC device. Luminex technology will be used to quantify the concentrations of 65 mediators relevant to the inflammatory response in peritoneal fluid and plasma. The primary endpoint is the difference in the plasma concentration of the pro-inflammatory cytokine IL-6 at 24 and 48 h after TAC dressing application. Secondary endpoints include the differential effects of these dressings on the systemic concentration of other pro-inflammatory cytokines, collective peritoneal and systemic inflammatory mediator profiles, postoperative fluid balance, intra-abdominal pressure, and several patient-important outcomes, including organ dysfunction measures and mortality.

Discussion

Results from this study will improve understanding of the effect of active negative pressure peritoneal therapy after damage control laparotomy on the inflammatory response. It will also gather necessary pilot information needed to inform design of a multicenter trial comparing clinical outcomes among patients randomized to TAC with the ABThera versus Barker’s vacuum pack.

Trial registration

ClinicalTrials.gov identifier http://www.clicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01355094

Preservation of hepatic blood flow by direct peritoneal resuscitation improves survival and prevents hepatic inflammation following hemorrhagic shock

Conventional resuscitation (CR) from hemorrhagic shock (HS) results in gut and liver hypoperfusion, organ and cellular edema, and vital organ injury. Adjunct direct peritoneal resuscitation (DPR) with dialysate prevents gut vasoconstriction, hypoperfusion, and injury. We hypothesized that DPR might also improve hepatocellular edema, inflammation, and injury. Anesthetized male SD rats were assigned to groups (n = 8/group): 1) sham (no HS); 2) HS (40% MAP/60 min) + intravenous fluid conventional resuscitation [CR; shed blood + 2 vol saline (SAL)/30 min]; 3) HS+CR+DPR (30 ml ip 2.5% glucose dialysate); or 4) HS+CR+SAL (30 ml ip saline). Histopathology showed lung and liver injury in HS+CR and HS+CR+SAL up to 24-h postresuscitation (post-RES) that was not in shams and which was prevented by adjunct DPR. Wet-to-dry weight ratios in HS+CR revealed organ edema formation that was prevented by adjunct DPR. HS+CR and HS+CR+SAL had 34% mortality by 24-h post-RES, which was absent with DPR (0%). Liver IFN-γ and IL-6 levels were elevated in CR compared with DPR or shams. TNF-α mRNA was upregulated in CR/sham and DPR/sham. IL-17 was downregulated in DPR/sham. CXCL10 mRNA was upregulated in CR/sham but downregulated in DPR/sham. Despite restored central hemodynamic performance after CR of HS, liver blood flow was compromised up to 24 h post-RES, and the addition of DPR restores and maintains liver perfusion at 24-h post-RES. DPR prevented liver injury, histological damage, and edema formation compared with CR alone. DPR provided a mitigating anti-inflammatory dampening of the systemic inflammatory response. In all, these effects likely account for improved survivorship in the DPR-treated group.

Direct peritoneal resuscitation augments ileal blood flow in necrotizing enterocolitis via a novel mechanism

PURPOSE

Endothelin-1, prostaglandins (PGs), and nitric oxide (NO) have been implicated in the intestinal microvascular dysfunction of necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC). We hypothesized that direct peritoneal resuscitation (DPR) dilates the intestinal microvasculature and improves blood flow independent of these mechanisms.

METHODS

Rat pups were assigned by litter to experimental NEC or CONTROL groups. Laser Doppler flowmetry evaluation of intestinal microvascular blood flow was studied at baseline, with mediator blockade (endothelin-A receptor, endothelin-B receptor, PG synthesis, or NO synthase) and with DPR. Repeated-measures analysis of variance test was applied with Tukey-Kramer honestly significant difference test (P < .05).

RESULTS

At baseline, NEC animals demonstrated significantly decreased ileal blood flow as compared with CONTROLs (P < .05). Endothelin-A receptor and PG inhibition increased flow in the intestinal microvasculature, but this was significantly augmented by the addition of DPR (P < .05). Blockade of NO synthase decreased intestinal blood flow, which was overcome with addition of DPR (P < .05).

CONCLUSION

Ileal blood flow was significantly reduced in NEC animals as compared with CONTROLs. The addition of DPR to the peritoneum increased ileal blood flow significantly in all groups in spite of blockade of these known vasoactive mechanisms. Direct peritoneal resuscitation may be a novel strategy to improve intestinal blood flow in NEC.

Toward computational identification of multiscale "tipping points" in acute inflammation and multiple organ failure

Sepsis accounts annually for nearly 10% of total U.S. deaths, costing nearly $17 billion/year. Sepsis is a manifestation of disordered systemic inflammation. Properly regulated inflammation allows for timely recognition and effective reaction to injury or infection, but inadequate or overly robust inflammation can lead to Multiple Organ Dysfunction Syndrome (MODS). There is an incongruity between the systemic nature of disordered inflammation (as the target of inflammation-modulating therapies), and the regional manifestation of organ-specific failure (as the subject of organ support), that presents a therapeutic dilemma: systemic interventions can interfere with an individual organ system's appropriate response, yet organ-specific interventions may not help the overall system reorient itself. Based on a decade of systems and computational approaches to deciphering acute inflammation, along with translationally-motivated experimental studies in both small and large animals, we propose that MODS evolves due to the feed-forward cycle of inflammation → damage → inflammation. We hypothesize that inflammation proceeds at a given, "nested" level or scale until positive feedback exceeds a "tipping point." Below this tipping point, inflammation is contained and manageable; when this threshold is crossed, inflammation becomes disordered, and dysfunction propagates to a higher biological scale (e.g., progressing from cellular, to tissue/organ, to multiple organs, to the organism). Finally, we suggest that a combination of computational biology approaches involving data-driven and mechanistic mathematical modeling, in close association with studies in clinically relevant paradigms of sepsis/MODS, are necessary in order to define scale-specific "tipping points" and to suggest novel therapies for sepsis.

Peritoneal negative pressure therapy prevents multiple organ injury in a chronic porcine sepsis and ischemia/reperfusion model

Sepsis and hemorrhage can result in injury to multiple organs and is associated with an extremely high rate of mortality. We hypothesized that peritoneal negative pressure therapy (NPT) would reduce systemic inflammation and organ damage. Pigs (n = 12) were anesthetized and surgically instrumented for hemodynamic monitoring. Through a laparotomy, the superior mesenteric artery was clamped for 30 min. Feces was mixed with blood to form a fecal clot that was placed into the peritoneum, and the abdomen was closed. All subjects were treated with standard isotonic fluid resuscitation, wide spectrum antibiotics, and mechanical ventilation, and were monitored for 48 h. Animals were separated into two groups 12 h (T12) after injury: for NPT (n = 6), an abdominal wound vacuum dressing was placed in the laparotomy, and negative pressure (-125 mmHg) was applied (T12 - T48), whereas passive drainage (n = 6) was identical to the NPT group except the abdomen was allowed to passively drain. Negative pressure therapy removed a significantly greater volume of ascites (860 ± 134 mL) than did passive drainage (88 ± 56 mL). Systemic inflammation (e.g. TNF-α, IL-1β, IL-6) was significantly reduced in the NPT group and was associated with significant improvement in intestine, lung, kidney, and liver histopathology. Our data suggest NPT efficacy is partially due to an attenuation of peritoneal inflammation by the removal of ascites. However, the exact mechanism needs further elucidation. The clinical implication of this study is that sepsis/trauma can result in an inflammatory ascites that may perpetuate organ injury; removal of the ascites can break the cycle and reduce organ damage.

Preliminary resuscitation for perforated necrotizing enterocolitis: 2 cases treated with initial direct peritoneal resuscitation

We used peritoneal infusions of 2.5% dextrose solution as an adjunct to resuscitation of 2 very low-birth-weight infants having perforated necrotizing enterocolitis. This was repeated every 12 hours for 7 days before and 1 day after extensive bowel resection. The designation of this research method has been termed direct peritoneal resuscitation. We discuss our observations and the evolution of this technique from studies in the animal laboratory to a recent trial in patients with abdominal trauma. We propose that the early response benefit of this preoperative resuscitation seen in our 2 cases be investigated by others. Prospective controlled trials could then be considered for those high-risk patients having diffuse disease and shock.

Direct peritoneal resuscitation accelerates primary abdominal wall closure after damage control surgery

BACKGROUND

Damage control surgery is a staged approach to the trauma patient in extremis that improves survival, but leads to open abdominal wounds that are difficult to manage. We evaluated whether directed peritoneal resuscitation (DPR) when used as a resuscitation strategy in severely injured trauma patients with hemorrhagic shock requiring damage control surgery would affect the amount of and timing of resuscitation and/or show benefits in time to abdominal closure and reduction of intra-abdominal complications.

STUDY DESIGN

A retrospective case-matched study of patients undergoing damage control surgery for hemorrhagic shock secondary to trauma between January 2005 and December 2008 was performed. Twenty patients undergoing standardized wound closure and adjunctive DPR were identified and matched to 40 controls by Injury Severity Score, age, gender, and mechanism of injury. A single early death was excluded because of inability to control ongoing hemorrhage.

RESULTS

There were no differences in age, gender, or mechanism of injury between the groups. Injury Severity Score (35.07 +/- 17.1 versus DPR 34.95 +/- 16.95; p = 0.82) and packed red blood cell administration in 24 hours (23.8 +/- 14.35 U versus DPR 26.9 +/- 14.1 U; p = 0.43) were similar between the groups. Presenting pH was similar between the study group and the DPR group (7.24 +/- 0.13 d versus DPR 7.26 +/- 0.11; p = 0.8). Time to definitive abdominal closure was significantly less in the DPR group compared with controls (DPR: 4.35 +/- 1.6 d versus 7.05 +/- 3.31; p < 0.003). DPR also allowed for a higher rate of primary fascial closure, lower intra-abdominal complication rate, and lower rate of ventral hernia formation at 6 months. Adjunctive DPR afforded a definitive wound closure advantage compared with Wittmann patch closure techniques (DPR 4.35 +/- 1.6 versus Wittmann patch 6.375 +/- 1.3; p = 0.004).

CONCLUSIONS

The addition of adjunctive DPR to the damage control strategy shortens the interval to definitive fascial closure without affecting overall resuscitation volumes. As a result, this mitigates intra-abdominal complications associated with open abdomen and damage control surgery and affords better patient outcomes.

Hemorrhage-induced hepatic injury and hypoperfusion can be prevented by direct peritoneal resuscitation

BACKGROUND

Crystalloid fluid resuscitation after hemorrhagic shock (HS) that restores/maintains central hemodynamics often culminates in multi-system organ failure and death due to persistent/progressive splanchnic hypoperfusion and end-organ damage. Adjunctive direct peritoneal resuscitation (DPR) using peritoneal dialysis solution reverses HS-induced splanchnic hypoperfusion and improves survival. We examined HS-mediated hepatic perfusion (galactose clearance), tissue injury (histopathology), and dysfunction (liver enzymes).

METHODS

Anesthetized rats were randomly assigned (n = 8/group): (1) sham (no HS); (2) HS (40% mean arterial pressure for 60 min) plus conventional i.v. fluid resuscitation (CR; shed blood + 2 volumes saline); (3) HS + CR + 30 mL intraperitoneal (IP) DPR; or (4) HS + CR + 30 mL IP saline. Hemodynamics and hepatic blood flow were measured for 2 h after CR completion. In duplicate animals, liver and splanchnic tissues were harvested for histopathology (blinded, graded), hepatocellular function (liver enzymes), and tissue edema (wet-dry ratio).

RESULTS

Group 2 decreased liver blood flow, caused liver injuries (focal to submassive necrosis, zones 2 and 3) and tissue edema, and elevated liver enzymes (alanine aminotransferase (ALT), 149 +/- 28 microg/mL and aspartate aminotransferase (AST), 234 +/- 24 microg/mL; p < 0.05) compared to group 1 (73 +/- 9 and 119 +/- 10 microg/mL, respectively). Minimal/no injuries were observed in group 3; enzymes were normalized (ALT 89 +/- 9 microg/mL and AST 150 +/- 17 microg/mL), and tissue edema was similar to sham.

CONCLUSIONS

CR from HS restored and maintained central hemodynamics but did not restore or maintain liver perfusion and was associated with significant hepatocellular injury and dysfunction. DPR added to conventional resuscitation (blood and crystalloid) restored and maintained liver perfusion, prevented hepatocellular injury and edema, and preserved liver function.

Purinergic receptors in the splanchnic circulation

There is considerable evidence that purines are vasoactive molecules involved in the regulation of blood flow. Adenosine is a well known vasodilator that also acts as a modulator of the response to other vasoactive substances. Adenosine exerts its effects by interacting with adenosine receptors. These are metabotropic G-protein coupled receptors and include four subtypes, A(1), A(2A), A(2B) and A(3). Adenosine triphosphate (ATP) is a co-transmitter in vascular neuroeffector junctions and is known to activate two distinct types of P2 receptors, P2X (ionotropic) and P2Y (metabotropic). ATP can exert either vasoconstrictive or vasorelaxant effects, depending on the P2 receptor subtype involved. Splanchnic vascular beds are of particular interest, as they receive a large fraction of the cardiac output. This review focus on purinergic receptors role in the splanchnic vasomotor control. Here, we give an overview on the distribution and diversity of effects of purinergic receptors in splanchnic vessels. Pre- and post-junctional receptormediated responses are summarized. Attention is also given to the interactions between purinergic receptors and other receptors in the splanchnic circulation.

Cellular edema regulates tissue capillary perfusion after hemorrhage resuscitation

BACKGROUND

Hemorrhage-induced activation of endothelial cell Na+/H+ -exchanger results in cellular swelling, which physically impedes capillary filling and compromises gut perfusion. We hypothesized that correction of the vascular volume deficit by conventional resuscitation does not improve capillary filling unless cellular swelling is prevented. Also, we hypothesized that adjunctive direct peritoneal resuscitation (DPR) with topical peritoneal dialysis solution (Delflex; Fresenius USA, Inc., Ogden, Ut) enhances capillary filling and gut perfusion by mechanisms that are independent of the Na+/H+ function.

METHODS

In vivo intravital videomicroscopy and Doppler velocimeter were used by us to measure microvascular diameter and flow, capillary filling (index of functional capillary density, FCD), and endothelial cell function in the terminal ileum of anesthetized rats. Rats were bled to 50% mean arterial pressure for 60 min and resuscitated with the shed blood plus 2 volumes of saline (conventional resuscitation). Prevention of endothelial cell swelling was achieved with topical amiloride (specific Na+/H+ inhibitor) in the tissue bath before hemorrhage or simultaneously with conventional resuscitation. DPR was simulated by instillation of Delflex in the tissue bath as adjunctive to conventional resuscitation. Sham no hemorrhage group and a simulated DPR group that received topical amiloride treatment served as controls.

RESULTS

Conventional resuscitation from hemorrhagic shock restored and maintained central hemodynamics but caused progressive and persistent intestinal vasoconstriction and hypoperfusion associated with low FCD and endothelial cell dysfunction. Prevention of endothelial cell swelling when combined with conventional resuscitation, preserved endothelial cell function, and restored local intestinal microvascular variables to near-prehemorrhage levels. Simulated adjunctive DPR produced rapid, sustained, and generalized vasodilation associated with restoration of endothelial cell function, and maximum recruitment of FCD independent of the Na+/H+ -exchanger function.

CONCLUSIONS

Paradoxical endothelial cell swelling occurs early during hemorrhagic shock because of activation of the Na+/H+ exchanger. This cellular edema, which is not resolved by correction of the vascular volume deficit, explains the persistent postresuscitation endothelial cell dysfunction and gut hypoperfusion. Simulated adjunctive DPR in this study reversed endothelial cell swelling and enhanced gut perfusion by mechanisms that are independent of the Na+/H+ exchanger activity.