507 Warren-Zeppa distal splenorenal shunts: a 34-year experience

Hepatitis C Cirrhosis, Hepatitis B Superimposed Infection, and the Emergence of an Acute Portal Vein Thrombosis: A Case Report

Acute portal vein thrombosis (PVT) is a complication of liver cirrhosis. The presence of viral infections such as hepatitis B (HBV) and hepatitis C (HCV) can further increase cirrhotic patients' risk of developing PVT, especially in the rare case when there is superinfection with both HBV and HCV. We present a patient with HCV cirrhosis whose clinical condition was decompensated secondary to the development of superimposed HBV infection, who developed acute PVT during hospitalization. This case offers a unique presentation of acute PVT that developed within several days of hospitalization for decompensated liver disease, as proven by the interval absence of portal venous flow on repeat imaging. Despite the workup on the initial presentation being negative for PVT, reconsideration of differentials after the change in our patient's clinical status led to the diagnosis. Active HBV infection was likely the initial trigger for the patient's cirrhosis decompensation and presentation; the subsequent coagulopathy and alteration in the portal blood flow triggered the development of an acute PVT. The risk for both prothrombotic and antithrombotic complications remains high in patients with cirrhosis, a risk that is vastly increased by the presence of superimposedinfections. The diagnosis of thrombotic complications such as PVT can be challenging, thus stressing the importance of repeat imaging in instances where clinical suspicion remains high despite negative imaging. Anticoagulation should be considered for cirrhotic patients with PVT on an individual basis for both prevention and treatment. Prompt diagnosis, early intervention, and close monitoring of patients with PVT are crucial for improving clinical outcomes. The goal of this report is to illustrate diagnostic challenges that accompany the diagnosis of acute PVT in cirrhosis, as well as discuss therapeutic options for optimal management of this condition.

An analysis on the use of Warren's distal splenorenal shunt surgery for the treatment of portal hypertension at the University Hospitals Leuven

INTRODUCTION

Extrahepatic portal vein thrombosis (PVT) is the most common cause of portal hypertension (PH), particularly in children. PH-related manifestations include refractory variceal bleeding, splenomegaly and ascites. Albeit more rarely performed, the distal splenorenal shunt (Warren's shunt) has proven to be effective in selectively decompressing the collateral circulation. The aim of our study was to describe our experience with the distal splenorenal shunt and to determine the long-term effect on PH-related side-effects.

METHODS

Distal splenorenal shunt operations performed at our institution between 2000 and 2014 were reviewed for: age, male/female ratio, children/adults ratio, body mass index, indications, grade of PVT (Yerdel classification), maximal shunt-flow velocity, shunt patency and thrombosis, re-intervention for variceal bleeding and survival. Complications of PH (esophageal variceal bleeding and ascites) were compared pre- versus post-operatively (last follow-up). Paired student t-test and fisher's exact were applied for pre- versus post-operative comparison. Results are reported as median [range].

RESULTS

Fourteen patients with PVT and refractory complications of PH underwent distal splenorenal shunt surgery. Age was 15 years [4.5-66]. Male/female ratio was 7/7. PVT -grade was 2 [1-4]. Follow-up was 3 [0.5-14]. All shunts were patent (100%) with no shunt thrombosis (0%) at last follow-up. There was no re-intervention for variceal bleeding (0%) and survival at last follow-up was 100%. Occurrence of esophageal variceal bleeding was higher pre-operatively (57%) than postoperatively (0%) (p = .0032) and also the incidence of ascites was higher pre-operatively (79%) than postoperatively (0%) (p < .0001).

CONCLUSIONS

Based on our experience, the distal splenorenal shunt can be considered a valuable surgical technique for PVT-induced PH, with excellent post-operative prevention of complications of PH.

Current Indications and Long-Term Outcomes of Surgical Portosystemic Shunts in Adults

BACKGROUND

Surgical portosystemic shunts are rare. We reviewed indications, operative details, and outcomes of patients undergoing surgical portosystemic shunt procedures.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed clinical data of consecutive patients between 1997 and 2018 from a single institution. Clinical characteristics and outcomes were compared between two groups: patients with portomesenteric venous thrombosis (PMVT) vs those with cirrhosis. Endpoints included 30-day mortality, shunt-related complications, patency, and survival.

RESULTS

There were 99 patients, 45 male and 54 female, with a mean age of 46 ± 18 years, enrolled in the study. There were 63 patients (63%) with PMVT and 36 patients (36%) with cirrhosis. Both groups had similar demographics, cardiovascular risk factors, and aneurysm extent, except for more diabetes among those with cirrhosis (p < 0.05). There were no significant differences in procedural metrics and intra-procedure complications between groups, except that patients with PMVT underwent more non-selective shunts than those with cirrhosis (63% vs. 30%, p < 0.001). There were two 30-day deaths (2%), with no difference in mortality and MAEs between groups. On univariate analysis, cholangiopathy and PMVT were associated with graft thrombosis (HR = 9.22, 95% CI 1.22-70.27) while race, smoking, cardiac comorbidity, type of operative shunt, configuration of the shunt, and use of conduit were not (p > 0.05). Patients with PMVT had significantly lower 1-, 5-, and 10-year primary (77%, 71%, and 71% vs. 97%, p = 0.009) and secondary patency (88%, 76%, and 72% vs. 96%, p = 0.027) compared with those with cirrhosis. The 1-, 5-, and 10-year survival rates were 94%, 84%, and 61% for patients with PMVT compared with 88%, 58%, and 26% for those with cirrhosis (non-adjusted HR 0.40, 95% CI 0.19-0.84, p = 0.01, age-adjusted HR 0.51, 95% CI 0.24-1.09, p = 0.08). The survival of patients with PMVT without liver disease trended higher than those with liver disease; however, when adjusted for age, the survival gap narrowed, and the difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.19), survival being lowest for those with PMVT and liver disease.

CONCLUSIONS

Surgical portosystemic shunts are safe and effective for symptom relief in selected patients with portal hypertension. The odds of graft thrombosis is 9 times higher in patients with PMVT. Overall survival is similar in patients with PMVT or cirrhosis.

Multidisciplinary approach to the complex treatment for non-cirrhotic portal hypertension - case-report-based discussion

Non-cirrhotic portal vein thrombosis (PVT) in patients with antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) is a rare complication, and the management has to be determined individually based on the extent and severity of the presentation. We report on a 37-year-old male patient with non-cirrhotic chronic PVT related to a severe thrombophilia, comprising APS, antithrombin-, factor V- and factor X-deficiency. Three years after the initial diagnosis of non-cirrhotic PVT, the patient presented with severe hemorrhagic shock related to acute bleeding from esophageal varices, requiring an emergency transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic stent shunt (TIPSS). TIPSS was revised after a recurrent bleeding episode due to insufficient reduction of the portal pressure. Additionally, embolization of the dilated V. coronaria ventriculi led to the regression of esophageal varices but resulted simultaneously in a left-sided portal hypertension (LSPH) with development of stomach wall and perisplenic varices. After a third episode of acute esophageal varices bleeding, a surgical distal splenorenal shunt (Warren shunt) was performed to reduce the LSPH. Despite anticoagulation with low molecular weight heparin and antithrombin substitution, endoluminal thrombosis led to a complete Warren shunt occlusion, aggravating the severe splenomegaly and pancytopenia. Finally, a partial spleen embolization (PSE) was performed. In the postinterventional course, leukocyte and platelet counts increased rapidly and the patient showed no further bleeding episodes. Overall, this complex course demonstrates the need for individual assessment of multimodal treatment options in non-cirrhotic portal hypertension. This young patient required triple modality porto-systemic pressure reduction (TIPSS, Warren shunt, PSE) and involved finely balanced anticoagulation and bleeding control.

Surgical treatment for portal hypertension

Surgical expertise that is likely to be lost

Portal vein thrombosis

Portal vein thrombosis is an important cause of portal hypertension. PVT occurs in association with cirrhosis or as a result of malignant invasion by hepatocellular carcinoma or even in the absence of associated liver disease. With the current research into its genesis, majority now have an underlying prothrombotic state detectable. Endothelial activation and stagnant portal blood flow also contribute to formation of the thrombus. Acute non-cirrhotic PVT, chronic PVT (EHPVO), and portal vein thrombosis in cirrhosis are the three main variants of portal vein thrombosis with varying etiological factors and variability in presentation and management. Procoagulant state should be actively investigated. Anticoagulation is the mainstay of therapy for acute non-cirrhotic PVT, with supporting evidence for its use in cirrhotic population as well. Chronic PVT (EHPVO) on the other hand requires the management of portal hypertension as such and with role for anticoagulation in the setting of underlying prothrombotic state, however data is awaited in those with no underlying prothrombotic states. TIPS and liver transplant may be feasible even in the setting of PVT however proper selection of candidates and type of surgery is warranted. Thrombolysis and thrombectomy have some role. TARE is a new modality for management of HCC with portal vein invasion.

Colectomy for Porto-Systemic Encephalopathy: Is it Still Topical?

Hepatic encephalopathy (HE) is a common long term complication of porto-systemic shunt. We report herein the case of a 59-year-old man with Child-Pugh A cirrhosis treated successfully 9 years earlier with distal splenorenal shunt for uncontrolled variceal bleeding. In the last year, he developed a severe and persistent hepatic encephalopathy secondary to the shunt, which was resistant to medical therapy. As liver transplantation was not available and obliteration of the shunt was hazardous, we performed subtotal colectomy in order to reduce ammonia production. This therapeutic option proved successful, as the grade of encephalopathy decreased and the patient improved. Our experience indicates that colonic exclusion should be considered as an option in the management of HE refractory to medical treatment in highly selected patients when liver transplantation is not available or even as a bridge given the long waiting time on lists.

Portal hypertension from nodular regenerative hyperplasia of the liver treated with distal splenorenal shunt

Portal hypertension (PH) is a devastating sequelae of several pathologic entities, with alcoholic cirrhosis being the most common cause in the western world and endemic schistosomiasis worldwide. A much less common aetiology of non-cirrhotic PH is nodular regenerative hyperplasia (NRH) of the liver. The hallmark of NRH is a benign remodeling of the hepatic parenchyma into regenerative nodules in the absence of fibrosis (1). A Warren-Zeppa Distal Splenorenal Shunt (DSRS) was performed in a young patient with NRH of the liver to alleviate PH. This procedure was chosen due to its low postoperative rates of hepatic insufficiency and high durability.

Venous drainage from the tail of the pancreas to the lienal vein and its relationship with the distal splenorenal shunt selectivity

PURPOSE

To identify the veins draining from the pancreatic tail to the lienal vein and its possible relationship with the loss of the distal splenorenal shunt selectivity.

METHODS

Thirty eight human blocks including stomach, duodenum, spleen, colon and pancreas, removed from fresh corpses, were studied with the replenish and corrosion technique, using vinilic resin and posterior corrosion of the organic tissue with commercial hydrochloric acid, in order to study the lienal vein and its tributaries.

RESULTS

The number of veins flowing directly to the splenic vein varied from seven to twenty two (14.52 + or - 3.53). Pancreatic branches of the pancreatic tail flowing to the segmentary veins of the spleen were found in 25 of the anatomical pieces studied (65.79%). These branches varied from one to four, predominating one branch (60%) and two branches (24%).

CONCLUSIONS

In 65.79% of the anatomical pieces studied, the veins of the pancreatic tail flowed in segmentary branches of the splenic vein. These branches could be responsible for the loss of distal splenorenal shunt selectivity. The complete disconnection of the pancreatic tail could increase the selectivity in this procedure.

Is there a role for anticoagulants in portal vein thrombosis management in cirrhotic patients?

IMPORTANCE OF THE FIELD

Portal vein thrombosis (PVT) is one of the principal complications of liver cirrhosis. The estimated prevalence is < 1% in patients with a compensated disease; this increases to 8 - 25% in candidates for liver transplantation. Many determinants may influence PVT clinical presentation and its outcome.

AREAS COVERED IN THIS REVIEW

We report the actual knowledge regarding management of PVT and analyze the different therapeutic approaches, focusing particularly on the use of anticoagulants and their implications in the complex clinical setting of liver cirrhosis. We also describe the possible available preemptive strategies, as an early prophylactic management based on clinical, biochemical or radiological parameters may in the future reduce PVT incidence and complications, ameliorating patients' outcome.

WHAT THE READER WILL GAIN

The importance of an accurate PVT diagnosis and its implications in PVT management; a description of the different available therapeutic tools, their efficacy and their possible risks in different typologies of patients; the principal elements to choose a correct individualized therapy for PVT patients.

TAKE HOME MESSAGE

The challenge for clinicians is the early identification of PVT, in order to prevent frightening complications, such as variceal bleeding or mesenteric infarction, and to provide the best therapeutic management.

Review article: the modern management of portal vein thrombosis

BACKGROUND

Portal vein thrombosis (PVT) is an important cause of portal hypertension. It may occur as such with or without associated cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma. Information on its management is scanty.

AIM

To provide an update on the modern management of portal vein thrombosis. Information on portal vein thrombosis in patients with and without cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma is also updated.

METHODS

A pubmed search was performed to identify the literature using search items portal vein thrombosis-aetiology and treatment and portal vein thrombosis in cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma.

RESULTS

Portal vein thrombosis occurs because of local inflammatory conditions in the abdomen and prothrombotic factors. Acute portal vein thrombosis is usually symptomatic when associated with cirrhosis and/or superior mesenteric vein thrombosis. Anticoagulation should be given for 3-6 months if detected early. If prothrombotic factors are identified, anticoagulation should be given lifelong. Chronic portal vein thrombosis usually presents with well tolerated upper gastrointestinal bleed. It is diagnosed by imaging, which demonstrates a portal cavernoma in place of a portal vein. Anticoagulation does not have a definite role, but bleeds can be treated with endotherapy or shunt surgery. Rarely liver transplantation may be considered.

CONCLUSION

Role of anticoagulation in chronic portal vein thrombosis needs to be further studied.

Interleukin-6 inhibits oxidative injury and necrosis after extreme liver resection

Extreme hepatectomy or resection of more than 80% of liver mass often leads to liver failure and death and is a major limitation to therapeutic liver resection for patients with liver tumors. We sought to define the mechanisms leading to liver failure and to determine the utility of interleukin-6 (IL-6) administration to improve outcomes. Mice were injected with Chinese hamster ovary cells expressing human IL-6 or no recombinant protein, or were administered recombinant IL-6 or carrier by osmotic mini-pump. Mice were then subjected to 70% or 87% hepatectomy. Light and electron microscopy of liver sections after 87% hepatectomy showed ballooning hepatocytes, vacuolar changes, and mitochondrial abruption, with absence of anoikic nuclei. No significant activation of executor caspases or DNA laddering was observed, although a dramatic decrease in cellular adenosine triphosphate (ATP) stores was measured, suggesting cell death was by a necrotic pathway involving mitochondrial dysfunction. A large increase in protein oxidation was observed, indicative of significant oxidative stress. IL-6 treatment before 87% hepatectomy resulted in less biochemical and histological evidence of liver injury as well as earlier proliferating chain nuclear antigen (PCNA) expression and accelerated recovery of liver mass. IL-6 pretreatment induced the antioxidative injury proteins, ref-1 and GPX1, decreased protein oxidation, vacuolar changes and leakage of mitochondrial products, improved ATP stores, and maintained cellular ultrastructure after 87% hepatectomy.

CONCLUSION

Massive oxidative injury and mitochondrial dysfunction occurs in the liver after extreme hepatectomy. IL-6 improves recovery and survival from extreme liver resection by enhancing pro-growth pathways, reducing oxidative stress, and maintaining mitochondrial function.