Laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication in a community hospital: patient satisfaction survey

Laparoscopic fundoplication performed in community hospital settings: A protocol for systematic review

BACKGROUND

Laparoscopic fundoplication (LF) is well-established as the surgical intervention of choice for management of refactory gastro-esophageal reflux disease. Much of its success lies in the reported benefits in symptom control outlined by the postoperative patient. It is unclear whether patient-reported outcomes differ according to the institution type providing care. This review aimed to address this knowledge gap by reviewing the available evidence examining patient-reported outcomes of LF in non-metropolitan centers.

OBJECTIVES

To investigate patient-reported outcomes of LF performed in regional or community-based hospitals.

DATA SOURCES

Four electronic databases, and citations of relevant articles.

STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA

Only studies that separately reported patient-reported outcomes of LF performed in regional or community hospitals were included; papers deemed to be unclear about the type of facility in which LF surgeries were performed, or in which data from LF surgeries performed in regional/community hospitals was combined with data from major metropolitan hospitals, were excluded.

STUDY APPRAISAL

Only studies that were graded as fair or good using Quality Assessment Tool for Observational Cohort and Cross-sectional studies were eligible for inclusion in this review. Seven studies were then eligible for inclusion, all of which were observational cohort studies with 6 of the studies reporting on a single intervention arm.

RESULTS

Seven observational cohort studies were included in the review, with a combined total of 1071 patients who underwent LF at non-metropolitan centers. Of these, data was collected for 742 patients, yielding an overall response rate of 69.3%. All 7 studies assessed patients' post-operative outcomes through questionnaires that were based on a modified Likert scale or a similar tool. Overall patient satisfaction was high (86%) and a significant majority of patients stated they would recommend the procedure to others (93.3%). Post-operative prevalence of reflux and dysphagia compared favorably to rates generally reported in the literature (11.9% and 17.6% respectively). Further research is required to ascertain the safety of performing these procedures in non-metropolitan hospitals.

CONCLUSION

Current evidence suggests that patient-reported outcomes are favorable for patients undergoing LF in community settings, and are broadly comparable to those undergoing LF in tertiary-level centers.

Quality of life of patients undergoing surgery by videolaparoscopy for GERD treatment

BACKGROUND

Gastroesophageal reflux disease is a chronic disease of high prevalence in Western countries, with negative effects on quality of life. Surgery is indicated for patients with intolerance to continuous medication, prolonged treatment or control, or in complicated forms of the disease.

AIM

To evaluate the quality of life of patients undergoing surgery by videolaparoscopy for gastroesophageal reflux disease treatment.

METHODS

Sample comprised 43 patients of both genders (mean age = 51.4 years). For quality of life evaluation was made using the questionnaire Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease Health Related Quality of Life, translated and validated into Portuguese. Data were analyzed by Epi Info version 3.5.1, using Duncan test and Pearson's correlation coefficient, with 5% for null hypothesis (p ≤ 0.05).

RESULTS

Over 50% of participants showed good quality of life (scores <5 of the questionnaire), more than 90% indicated satisfaction with their health. A significant positive correlation between most variables related to heartburn and the time after surgery was observed (p ≤ 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Patients presented good quality of life and high level of satisfaction with their postoperative condition.

The impact of fibrin glue in the prevention of failure after Nissen fundoplication

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Good long term result after Nissen fundoplication is achieved in most of the patients in specialized centres. Still failure occurs in some cases and reoperation after failed conservative treatment is done in 3-6% of the cases. Reoperation is more dangerous and results worse than after primary fundoplication. Therefore we wanted to analyze factors related to failure of Nissen fundoplication with special emphasis on utilization of crural closure, anchor-ing of the fundic wrap and the use of fibrin glue.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Patients records of 258 patients were analyzed by an independent ob-server. Defective fundic wrap, recurrent oesophagitis and hiatal hernia were defined as failure.

RESULTS

Failure after Nissen fundoplication was found in 29 patients (14.9%). Crural closure (p = 0.021), anchoring of the wrap (p = 0.020) and fibrin glue (p = 0.029) decreased the incidence of failure. However, only crural closure (p = 0.010) and fibrin glue (p = 0.019) were independent factors in the prevention of failure.

CONCLUSIONS

Fibrin glue as a new method might be worth utilizing to further decrease the incidence of failure after Nissen fundoplication. Because our study was retrospective, prospective randomized study should be performed before universal use of fibrin glue in the prevention of failure after fundoplication.

Evaluation of clinical outcome after laparoscopic antireflux surgery in clinical practice: still a controversial issue

Background. Laparoscopic antireflux surgery has shown to be effective in controlling gastroesophageal reflux (GERD). Yet, a universally accepted definition and evaluation for treatment success/failure in GERD is still controversial. The purpose of this paper is to assess if and how the outcome variables used in the different studies could possibly lead to an homogeneous appraisal of the limits and indications of LARS. Methods. We analyzed papers focusing on the efficacy and outcome of LARS and published in English literature over the last 10 years. Results. Symptoms scores and outcome variables reported are dissimilar and not uniform. The most consistent parameter was patient's satisfaction (mean satisfaction rate: 88.9%). Antireflux medications are not a trustworthy outcome index. Endoscopy and esophageal manometry do not appear very helpful. Twenty-four hours pH metry is recommended in patients difficult to manage for recurrent typical symptoms. Conclusions. More uniform symptoms scales and quality of life tools are needed for assessing the clinical outcome after laparoscopic antireflux surgery. In an era of cost containment, objective evaluation tests should be more specifically addressed. Relying on patient's satisfaction may be ambiguous, yet from this study it can be considered a practical and simple tool.

Quality of life and patient satisfaction 3 months and 3 years after laparoscopic Nissen's fundoplication

BACKGROUND/AIM

This study is based on studying the quality of life and degree of satisfaction among gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) patients after Laparoscopic Nissen's fundoplication (LNF) operations.

SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA

A GERD patient is most interested in symptom relief, whereas his surgeon will also be interested in the improvement of anatomical and functional investigations.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

One hundred patients with symptoms of GERD, adequate motility study and positive 24-hour pH studies underwent LNF in El-Mansoura Gastroenterology Center between 2002 and 2004. All patients completed the Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease-Health Related Quality Of Life (GERD-HRQL) questionnaire both pre- and postoperatively (early within 3 months after operation and late after 3 years). Furthermore, all patients were given a form with 4 grades (excellent, good, fair and poor) and they were requested to freely assess both the early and late clinical outcomes.

RESULTS

There was statistically significant improvement in all the items of the GERD-HRQL questionnaire, both early and late (P < 0.001). With regard to patient satisfaction; only 58 cases showed excellent clinical satisfaction early postoperatively, while 29, 8 and 5 patients showed good, fair and poor responses, respectively. These figures improved on late followup (P < 0.05), i.e., 76 excellent, 16 good and 8 fair results.

CONCLUSIONS

LNF improves all the items of quality of life among GERD patients significantly (P < 0.001). Patient satisfaction after LNF improves with time; 58 cases showed early postoperative excellent clinical satisfaction as compared to 76 late cases (P < 0.05). However, LNF may not be the standard management of reflux symptoms, particularly from some patients' perspective.