Treatment of Unstable Pelvic Fractures: Use of a Transiliac Sacral Rod for Posterior Lesions and an External Fixator for Anterior Lesions

What's old is best again Is anterior plating best for fixation of type-C pelvic fractures? A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Type-C pelvic fractures are a rare but potentially fatal injury that often leads to poor outcomes, despite surgical fixation. Many fixation methods are used but the optimal method remains contentious, with failure and complications common. This study compared outcomes for each fixation method.

METHODS

A systematic review was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA). A search of studies which reported on outcomes after surgically treated type-C pelvic fractures was undertaken. Data retrieved included fixation method, length of follow up, surgical revision, and complications rates (hardware breakage, post-operative outcomes, screw mal-positioning, screw loosening, loss of reduction and infection). Study quality was assessed using the Methodological Index for Non-Randomised Studies (MINORS). Pooled revision, outcome and complication rates were calculated using a quality-adjusted model in MetaXL 5.3.

RESULTS

Fifty-two studies met the inclusion criteria representing 1567 patients and 7 fixation methods. The meta-analyses demonstrated high rates of 'less-than-good' outcomes for most fixation methods, with a higher rate for bilateral injuries (overall 23%; unilateral 21% v bilateral 41%). The mean pooled rate for surgical revision rate was 4%, hardware breakage 3%, screw mal-positioning 2%, screw loosening 3%, loss of reduction 5% and infection 4%. Each fixation method had different performance profiles; however, anterior plating outperformed all other fixation methods for patient outcomes, with a 'less-than-good' rate of just 7% vs the pooled mean of 23% and demonstrated at or below pooled mean rates for all complications except revision which was 5%.

CONCLUSIONS

Post-operative outcomes for surgically treated type-C pelvic fractures revealed a 'less-than-good' pooled outcome rate of 23% and a revision rate of 4%. Anterior plates outperformed most other systems particularly for patient reported outcomes. Pooled revision, patient-reported outcome and complication rates for type-C pelvic fractures have not previously been reported and these data provide a benchmark for practice and future research.

Similar patient reported outcomes at long-term follow-up after external fixation versus internal fixation of the anterior ring component of APC injuries

PURPOSE

Unstable pelvic ring injuries produced by external rotation of the hemipelvis and a symphyseal disruption are most often treated with internal fixation of the anterior ring, with percutaneous treatment of the posterior ring as needed. In some clinical situations, patients are treated with external fixation for their anterior injuries and the long-term functional outcomes associated with external fixation are not well understood. We ask if there is a difference in functional outcome, between treatment of these injuries with internal versus external fixation, when measured at a minimum of three years after injury.

METHOD

This was a retrospective cohort study performed at a level one regional trauma center. Trauma database review identified 128 patients, with 70 subsequently excluded, with unstable anterior posterior compression (APC) pelvic ring injuries (OTA 61B2.3 & 61C1.2) treated with surgery with minimum three years of follow-up. An intervention of internal fixation versus external fixation of anterior pelvic ring was performed, and depending on the injury, supplemented with posterior iliosacral screw fixation. Main outcome was measured with the Majeed functional outcome score (0-100).

RESULTS

Patients treated with external fixation reported a Majeed score of 70 (95% CI 28-100) compared to 79 (95% CI 36-100) in those with internal fixation (p-value 0.28). Subgroups of the Majeed score were not significantly different (p value > 0.05). Open fractures, severity of injury, and ISS were worse in those treated with external fixation. There was no differential loss to follow-up. Conclusion Patients with unstable pelvic ring injuries with symphyseal disruptions treated with external fixation as definitive treatment versus internal fixation may fare no different in the long term.

The role of anterior supra-acetabular external fixator as definitive treatment for anterior ring fixation in unstable pelvic fractures

PURPOSE

Management of anterior ring injuries is still a matter of discussion, and there are only few studies reporting anterior external fixator as definitive treatment for unstable pelvic injuries. This study aimed to describe the clinical and radiological outcomes of a consecutive series of mechanically unstable pelvic injuries that were treated with definitive anterior supra-acetabular external fixator for the anterior ring, and to identify risk factors for failure.

METHODS

We included a consecutive series of patients with unstable pelvic ring fractures who underwent anterior supra-acetabular external fixation for definitive treatment, between January 2012 and January 2020. All demographics, associated injuries and procedures, injury mechanism, and complications were analysed. Pelvic fracture was classified based on Orthopaedic Trauma Association/Tile AO (OTA/AO) and Young-Burgess classifications. Complications associated with the external fixator were revised. All patients were functionally evaluated at final follow-up and asked to report their clinical outcomes using the Majeed score.

RESULTS

A total of 47 patients were included, of which 25 were females. The median age was 44 years (interquartile range 23-59). Median follow-up duration was 14 months (interquartile range 6-31). The most frequent aetiology was motor vehicle accident (35), followed by fall from height (8). All fractures required posterior pelvic ring fixation. The median time during which patients had external fixation in situ was 11 weeks (interquartile range 9-13). All patients achieved healing of pelvic fracture at median time of 10 weeks (interquartile range 8-12). At final follow-up, the median displacement of the anterior pelvis was 6 mm (interquartile range 0-11). Superficial infection was the most common complication (n = 7). No washout procedures were needed. No major complication was reported. No patient required reoperation for anterior ring fracture. The median Majeed score was 88 points (range 60-95; interquartile range 80-90) at final follow-up.

CONCLUSION

Our findings suggest that the use of supra-acetabular external fixator is safe and effective for definitive treatment of the anterior ring in unstable pelvic fractures. It is a method with high proportion of excellent results, regardless of the type of fracture. The rate of complications is low, and it does not compromise functional results.

Minimally invasive internal fixator for unstable pelvic ring injuries with a pedicle screw-rod system: a retrospective study of 23 patients after 13.5 months

PURPOSE

Pelvic ring fractures are challenging injuries and require effective treatment due to the frequently compromised patient condition. The aim of this study was to evaluate the outcome of unstable pelvic ring injuries treated with a minimally invasive pedicle screw-rod system.

METHODS

Retrospective analysis was performed for patients with an unstable pelvic ring injury that were treated with a minimally invasive anterior internal pelvic fixator (INFIX) with or without a posterior pedicle screw-rod fixator (6/2012-4/2015). The quality of reduction was evaluated by the Tornetta and Matta criteria and the clinical outcome was evaluated by the Majeed scores. Further evaluation included the operation time, intraoperative blood loss, and complication rate.

RESULTS

A total of 23 patients (12 males and 11 females) with a mean age of 37.6 years (range 10-65 years) and a follow-up of 13.5 months (6-27 months) were evaluated. The Tile classification showed 13 type B (B1 = 6, B2 = 4, and B3 = 3) and 10 type C (C1 = 7 and C2 = 3) fractures. Mean operation time and intraoperative blood loss were 24.8 min (20-30 min) and 20.4 ml (16-29 ml) for an anterior INFIX (n = 13), and 60 min (45-70 min) and 150 ml (115-168 ml) when combined with a posterior pedicle screw-rod fixator (n = 10). Quality of reduction was excellent in 13, good in 6, and fair in 4 patients, with no signs of heterotopic ossification. Clinical results after 6 months were excellent in 14 patients, good in 6, fair in 2, and poor in 1. Unilateral thigh paresthesia was seen in 2 patients which resolved after implant removal.

CONCLUSIONS

The INFIX appears to be a safe and minimally invasive surgical technique which can effectively be combined with posterior pedicle screw-rod fixation. It also can be applied for the definitive treatment of vertically and/or rotationally unstable pelvic ring injuries, especially in severely compromised patients with a high mortality risk.

External fixation of unstable pelvic fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Unstable pelvic fractures are typically caused by high-impact trauma. Early stabilization is required to prevent further neurological or visceral injury, haemorrhage, reduce pain, infection and long-term deformity and disability. The aim was to review the optimal external fixation techniques and management for unstable pelvic fractures.

METHODS

A total of 28 studies were identified from the initial database search. Seventeen studies met our inclusion criteria - eight prospective cohorts, four retrospective cohorts and five in vitro studies. This equated to 539 patients and 38 cadaveric (in vitro) models.

RESULTS

Type B and double vertical fractures have less re-displacement (43.7% and 68.2% <5 mm, respectively) than Type C fractures (55.7% >15 mm) regardless of pin placement. Greater than 50% experience a complication with the most common being pin site infection (36%) and a trend towards increased infection with increasing pins was seen. Most can be managed with antibiotics alone (93%). A minimum time of 6-8 weeks in frame was required for definitive management of all fractures.

CONCLUSION

This review supports the use of supra-acetabular pins over iliac crest pins to decrease re-displacement, the least number of pins for the shortest amount of time and the largest size pin where possible. Type B fractures will generally have a better outcome than Type C fractures. Definitive management in a frame should be at least 8 weeks. Further studies directly comparing iliac crest and supra-acetabular pin placement are recommended.

Patient Weight-bearing after Pelvic Fracture Surgery-A Systematic Review of the Literature: What is the Modern Evidence Base?

Background

Little attention in the literature appears to have been paid to the issue of postoperative weight-bearing protocols for different injury patterns after pelvic fracture surgery. The primary aim of this study is to review the currently available literature to define the level of available evidence used to inform surgical decisions on weight-bearing after pelvic fracture surgery. Secondary aims are to assess the published methods of fracture classification, surgical management, and assessment or reporting of patient outcomes.

Methods

A systematic review of the English language literature from 1990 to 2016 was undertaken. Eligible papers were all papers reporting minimum 6-month outcomes following surgery for pelvic fractures in adults. Exclusion criteria included pathological fractures or those resulting from penetrating injury, solely osteoporotic fractures, or series with less than 6 months of follow-up data.

Results

There is very little published scientific data to inform the treating surgeon on postoperative weight-bearing protocols after pelvic fracture surgery, with no randomized trials and only 1 paper out of 122 stating this as a primary aim. More than half of the papers published did not state what postoperative protocol was employed. There is no standardization of outcome measures, with less than 20% of papers using the most common validated outcome scoring system; in contrast, there is good agreement on the use of either the Tile (75%) or Burgess and Young (20%) classification.

Limitations

Due to the lack of published studies looking at the topic of postoperative weight-bearing after pelvic fractures, no specific recommendations are possible. As large numbers of papers were included, they were not individually assessed for bias.

Conclusion

A review of postoperative weight-bearing regimes reveals a nonexistent scientific evidence base from which to make recommendations, although a consensus strategy has been identified. Future research needs to be directed at this topic, as has already been the case in numerous other fracture areas, since the advantages of early mobility are potentially significant. The reported methodology for assessing and reporting patient outcomes after pelvic fracture surgery reveals no consistent standards, and the majority of papers use no specific outcome scoring system.

How to cite this article

Rickman M, Link B-C, Solomon LB. Patient Weight-bearing after Pelvic Fracture Surgery-A Systematic Review of the Literature: What is the Modern Evidence Base? Strategies Trauma Limb Reconstr 2019;14(1):45-52.

Evaluation of strategies for the treatment of type B and C pelvic fractures: results from the German Pelvic Injury Register

Aims

The best method of treating unstable pelvic fractures that involve the obturator ring is still a matter for debate. This study compared three methods of treatment: nonoperative, isolated posterior fixation and combined anteroposterior stabilization.

Patients and Methods

The study used data from the German Pelvic Trauma Registry and compared patients undergoing conservative management (n = 2394), surgical treatment (n = 1345) and transpubic surgery, including posterior stabilization (n = 730) with isolated posterior osteosynthesis (n = 405) in non-complex Type B and C fractures that only involved the obturator ring anteriorly. Calculated odds ratios were adjusted for potential confounders. Outcome criteria were intraoperative and general short-term complications, the incidence of nerve injuries, and mortality.

Results

Operative stabilization reduced mortality by 36% (odds ratio (OR) 0.64, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.42 to 0.98) but the incidence of complications was twice as high (OR 2.04, 95% CI 1.57 to 2.64). Mortality and the incidence of neurological deficits at discharge were no different after isolated posterior or combined anteroposterior fixation. However, the odds of both surgical (98%, OR 1.98, 95%CI 1.22 to 3.22) and general complications (43%, OR 1.43, 95% CI 1.02 to 2.00) were higher in the group with the more extensive surgery.

Conclusion

Operative stabilization is recommended for non-complex unstable pelvic fractures. The need for anterior fixation of obturator ring fractures should, however, be considered critically. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2018;100-B:973-83.

The use of external fixators in the definitive stabilisation of the pelvis in polytrauma patients: Safety, efficacy and clinical outcomes

OBJECTIVES

To analyse the complications and outcomes (functional/radiographic) of Pelvic External Fixators applied as part of the definitive fixation in polytrauma patients.

DESIGN

A single center retrospective chart review.

SETTING

A level-1 trauma center.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We reviewed all the polytrauma patients (ISS>16) between 2007 and 2012 that had a PEF applied more than 30days. Complications including infection, aseptic loosening, neurological injury, loss of reduction, non-union and mal-union were recorded. Pelvic asymmetry and Deformity Index (DI) were measured at the immediate postoperative radiographs and final follow-up. The functional outcome at final follow up was estimated using a scale previously reported by Chiou et al.

RESULTS

59 patients with mean age of 38.4 (16 - 81) years and mean ISS score 28 (16- 66) were included. The PEFs were applied for mean duration of 56 (30-104) days. The average follow-up was 403days. 22 injuries were type B and 37 type C (AO/OTA). The most common symptomatic complications were pin site infection in 11 (18.6%) and loosening in 5 (8.5%) cases. 44 (74.5%) patients had satisfactory functional outcome. The immediate post-operative and final asymmetry and DI were compared between the two pelvic injury groups (type B and C fractures). The difference in displacement progression was more for type C injuries (p=0.034) but no correlation to the functional outcome was evident.

CONCLUSION

PEF can be used as definitive alternative stabilization method in specific situations at polytrauma setting. Radiological displacement occurred in both type B and C injuries but the clinical outcome was not correlated to this displacement. Complications related to PEF do not affect the final clinical outcome.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic Level III.

Internal versus external fixation of the anterior component in unstable fractures of the pelvic ring: pooled results from a systematic review

PURPOSE

Improving reduction of the pelvic ring improves long-term functional outcomes for patients. It has been demonstrated that posterior internal fixation is necessary to adequately control fractures to the posterior ring and there is evidence that supplementing this with fixation of the anterior ring improves stability. It is accepted that internal fixation provides greater stability than external fixation of the anterior ring but long-term differences in radiographic and functional outcomes have not yet been quantified.

METHODS

A search of electronic databases, reference lists and review articles from 1989 to 2015 yielded 18 studies (n = 884) that met our inclusion criteria. We included studies that discussed pelvic ring injuries in adults, reported functional or radiological outcomes or complications by anterior ring intervention and exceeded 14 patients. We excluded biomechanical and cadaver studies.

RESULTS

Internal fixation of the anterior pelvic ring had better functional and radiographic outcomes. Residual displacement of >10 mm was less common with internal fixation (ER 0.12, 95 % CI 0.06-0.24) than external fixation (ER 0.31, 95 % CI 0.11-0.62). Unsatisfactory outcomes also occurred at a lower rate (ER 0.09, 95 % CI 0.03-0.22) compared to external fixation (ER 0.32, 95 % CI 0.18-0.50). Losses of reduction (ER 0.02, 95 % CI 0.01-0.04 versus ER 0.07, 95 % CI 0.02-0.21), malunions (ER 0.03, 95 % CI 0.01-0.08 versus ER 0.07, 95 % CI 0.02-0.21) and delayed/non-unions (ER 0.02, 95 % CI 0.01-0.05 versus ER 0.04, 95 % CI 0.02-0.07).

CONCLUSIONS

Internal fixation of the anterior pelvic ring as supplementary fixation for unstable injuries to the pelvic ring appears to result in better radiographic and functional outcomes as well as fewer complications. However, data that separated outcomes and complications in relation to interventions of the anterior pelvic ring were limited. More studies looking specifically at outcomes in relation to the type of anterior ring intervention are needed.

A minimally invasive stabilizing system for dorsal pelvic ring injuries

BACKGROUND

Open reduction and stabilization of dorsal pelvic ring injuries is accompanied by a high rate of soft tissue complications. Minimally invasive techniques have the potential to decrease soft tissue trauma, but the risk of iatrogenic nerve and vessel damage through the reduced surgical exposure should be considered. We treated these injuries using a transiliac internal fixator (TIFI) in a minimally invasive technique characterized by implantation of a pedicle screw and rod system, bridging the sacroiliac joints and the sacral area.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

We asked whether (1) we could achieve anatomic restoration with the device, (2) specific complications were associated with this minimally invasive approach (particularly enhanced intraoperative blood loss, soft tissue complications, and iatrogenic neurovascular damage), and (3) function 3 years after trauma was comparable to that of established methods.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed 67 patients with dorsal pelvic injuries during a 7-year period. We evaluated the (1) reduction by grading the maximal displacement measured with three radiographic views, (2) the complications during the observation period, and (3) the function with a validated questionnaire (Pelvic Outcome Score) in all but five patients at least 3 years after trauma (mean, 37 months; range, 36-42 months).

RESULTS

At last followup we observed a secondary fracture displacement greater than 5 mm in one patient. The intraoperative blood loss was less than 50 mL in all patients. No neurovascular lesions occurred owing to implantation. Four patients had wound infections, one had loosening of a single pedicle screw, and one had an iatrogenic screw malpositioning. Thirty-five of the 62 patients achieved Pelvic Outcome Scores of either a maximum score or 6 of 7 points.

CONCLUSION

Our observations suggest TIFI is a reasonable alternative to other established fixation devices for injuries of the dorsal pelvic ring with minor risks of major blood loss or iatrogenic neurovascular damage.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV, therapeutic study. See Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Low-energy osteoporotic pelvic fractures

The vast majority of pelvic fractures in geriatric patients are classified as stable injuries. The current treatment strategies of these fractures involve pain management and mobilization. Pain-related immobility may pose a serious hazard to patients with severe preexisting comorbidities. There is paucity of literature on the outcome and mortality after osteoporotic pelvic fractures in the elderly. This review aims to provide an overview of epidemiology, injury mechanism, fracture patterns, management and outcome after osteoporotic pelvic fractures.

[The pelvic subcutaneous cross-over internal fixator]

The pelvic subcutaneous cross-over internal fixator is a minimally invasive technique for the fixation of instable anterior pelvic ring fractures. A USS-II-VAS screw is anchored bilaterally in the supra-acetabular region of the os ileum by a mini-incision approach. An angled fixation rod is inserted subcutaneously and after successful closed reduction attached to the screws forming a locking internal fixation. In a retrospective study of the clinical and radiological outcomes of 19 patients after an average follow-up of 2.54 years, results were excellent and good in 31.6%, moderate in 63.2% and poor in 5.3%. Complications were one wound infection, one loosening of the VAS screw and seven temporary lesions of the lateral femoral cutaneous nerve. The main benefits are a simple surgical technique preventing damage to soft tissue, a low risk of neurovascular lesions and the avoidance of pin infections. Moreover patients with multiple trauma profit from a shorter time of surgery and greater comfort allowing a prone position. The new procedure combines the advantages of internal osteosynthesis and a minimally invasive technique, providing early mobilization under full-weight bearing for instable pelvic fractures.

Treatment of posterior pelvic ring injuries with minimally invasive percutaneous plate osteosynthesis

From January 2004 to July 2007, 21 patients with injuries at the posterior pelvic ring were treated with locking compression plate osteosynthesis through a minimally invasive approach and followed up for a mean of 12.2 months. Preoperative and postoperative radiography was conducted to assess the reduction and union. The mean operation time was 60 minutes (range: 40-80). Intraoperative blood loss was 50-150 ml. All patients achieved union at the final follow-up. The overall radiological results were excellent or good in 17 patients (85%). The functional outcome was excellent or good in 18 patients (90%). There was no iatrogenic nerve injury, deep infection or failure of fixation. We believe that fixation with a locking compression plate is an effective method for the treatment of injuries of the posterior pelvic ring in view of its convenience, minimal traumatic invasion and lower morbidity.

Minimally invasive transiliac plate osteosynthesis for type C injuries of the pelvic ring: a clinical and radiological follow-up

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate radiological and functional outcome in patients treated with minimally invasive transiliac plate osteosynthesis for unstable pelvic injuries.

DESIGN

Retrospective analysis of a prospective treatment protocol in a consecutive patient series.

SETTING

Level 1 trauma center.

PATIENTS

Between January 1998 and December 2005, 31 patients with type C injuries of the pelvic ring were treated with minimally invasive transiliac plate osteosynthesis. According to the AO classification, 16 patients had a C1-injury, 9 had a C2 fracture, and 6 patients sustained a C3 injury of the pelvic ring. Anterior-posterior, inlet, and outlet radiographs were obtained preoperatively, immediately postoperatively, and during follow-up. Clinical outcome was determined according to the Hannover pelvic outcome score.

INTERVENTION

Posterior plate osteosynthesis for type C injuries of the pelvic ring.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENT

Preoperative and postoperative dislocation of the posterior pelvic ring, loss of reduction, implant failure, implant removal, clinical results of the pelvic injury and general limitations following the trauma.

RESULTS

Maximum average dislocation of the posterior pelvic ring was 16.1 mm preoperatively; postoperatively, it was 6.1 mm. A total of 23 patients (74.2%) could be followed up after an average of 20 months (range 7-57 months). Seven patients underwent follow-up treatment at other hospitals closer to their respective residences, whereas 1 patient passed away in the early postoperative phase due to multiorgan failure. Loss of reduction occurred in 2 cases. The clinical outcome regarding the pelvis was very good in 8 cases, good in 9 cases, fair in 4 cases, and poor in 2 cases. Social reintegration according to the Hannover pelvic outcome score was complete in 9 cases, poor in 10 cases, and incomplete in 10 cases.

CONCLUSION

Posterior plate osteosynthesis is a sufficiently stable method for the treatment of unstable pelvic ring injuries with a low risk of iatrogenic nervous tissue and vascular lesions. The disadvantages are limited reduction possibilities, the necessity of bilateral bridging of the sacroiliac joint in a unilateral injury, as well as a higher rate of symptomatic hardware.