Fulminant pulmonary embolism treated by extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in a patient with traumatic brain injury

Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for acute pulmonary embolism after postoperative craniocerebral trauma: a case report

Introduction

Massive pulmonary embolism (PE) is a life-threatening complication of major surgery with a mortality rate of up to 50%. Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) is primarily used for respiratory and circulatory support. Venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) is used to stabilize patients with acute massive PE. Acute brain injury, vascular disease, and immunosuppression are contraindications to ECMO, as stated in the 2021 Extracorporeal Life Support Organization guidelines.

Case summary

We report a case of a patient with craniocerebral trauma whose postoperative course was complicated by massive PE and subsequent cardiac arrest that required urgent VA-ECMO, followed by anticoagulation with heparin. The patient showed hemodynamic improvement and was discharged 68 days after hospitalization.

Discussion

ECMO has gradually been accepted for patients with craniocerebral injuries. The safety and effectiveness of ECMO in patients with craniocerebral injury, along with the optimal duration of ECMO and anticoagulation strategies, require further study.

[Arteriovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO). A therapeutic option for fulminant pulmonary embolism]

According to the guidelines of the European (2008) and German Societies of Cardiology (2009) thrombolysis is recommended for patients with pulmonary embolisms presenting with cardiogenic shock (recommendation level I, evidence level A). If there are contraindications or thrombolysis is not successful surgical embolectomy should be considered (recommendation level I, evidence level C). Additional options are catheter-based therapies in the proximal pulmonary artery (recommendation level IIb, evidence level C). The use of arteriovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation ( ECMO) was not included in these guidelines. A literature search in PubMed resulted in some case reports of the successful use of arteriovenous ECMO for resuscitation in patients with severe pulmonary embolisms following failed thrombolysis. In this article we present the case report of a patient who developed fulminant pulmonary embolism immediately after surgery. The patient was still in cardiogenic shock despite thrombolysis but the condition was stable following implementation of an arteriovenous ECMO. Acute heart failure and hypoxemia of all organs are the main symptoms of massive pulmonary embolisms. The use of arteriovenous ECMO represents a therapeutic option for life-threatening pulmonary embolism. A decisive factor for success is immediate diagnosis and rapid implementation of the system.