Sensitization with Xenogeneic Tissues Alters the Heavy Chain Repertoire of Human Anti-Galα1–3Gal Antibodies

Xenotransplantation in transition

The application of xenotransplantation of porcine organs and tissues for treatment of disease, sought for more than a century, might soon be realized. Until now, the immune response of recipients against xenogeneic organs and tissues posed the main obstacle to clinical application. However, decades of research into this immune response and identification of other molecular barriers together with advances in genetic engineering and cloning of large animals and immune therapeutics coalesced to support prolonged survival and function of porcine organ grafts in nonhuman primates. This experimental progress in turn sparks consideration of clinical trials. The papers in this special section provide authoritative views concerning the immune hurdles that still limit and potentially still preclude clinical application of xenotransplantation. Xenoreactive antibodies elicited in T cell-dependent B cell-responses constitute the most important hurdle and control of these responses impels use of intense regimens of immunosuppression. These antibodies pose a danger to xenografts and potentially compromise subsequent allografts. However, new insights into the specificity of these antibodies, the pathways and kinetics of production and genetic determinants of pathogenicity offer novel opportunities for intervention. Likewise, the rapid ability to propose and test new strategies in nonhuman primate models hastens needed advances. However further progress will depend on development and validation of laboratory methods for identification and assay of pathogenic immune responses and evaluation of the response to therapy.

The five dimensions of B cell tolerance

B cell tolerance has been generally understood to be an acquired property of the immune system that governs antibody specificity in ways that avoid auto-toxicity. As useful as this understanding has proved, it fails to fully explain the existence of auto-reactive specificities in healthy individuals and contribution these may have to health. Mechanisms underlying B cell tolerance are considered to select a clonal repertoire that generates a collection of antibodies that do not bind self, ie tolerance operates more or less in three dimensions that largely spare autologous cells and antigens. Yet, most B lymphocytes in humans and probably in other vertebrates are auto-reactive and absence of these auto-reactive B cells is associated with disease. We suggest that auto-reactivity can be embodied by extending the concept of tolerance by two further dimensions, one of time and circumstance and one that allows healthy cells to actively resist injury. In this novel concept, macromolecular recognition by the B cell receptor leading to deletion, anergy, receptor editing or B cell activation is extended by taking account of the time of development of normal immune responses (4th dimension) and the accommodation (or tolerance) of normal cells to bound antibody, activation of complement, and interaction with inflammatory cells (fifth dimension). We discuss how these dimensions contribute to understanding B cell biology in health or disease.

Lessons from cardiac transplantation in infancy

Besides correcting devastating pathophysiology, cardiac transplantation in infancy offers an incomparable model for exploring the structure and function of the immune system. Infants and young children have relatively few memory B cells and T cells. Hence, the response of the young to allotransplantation better represents a primary immune response and may be better suited to testing spontaneous tolerance. Those who undergo cardiac transplantation in infancy are also unique because they are often subjected to thymectomy and depletion of mature T cells. These subjects can have a dramatic contraction of T cell diversity, allowing the testing of how diversity contributes to function.

Accommodation and antibodies

Accommodation refers to the condition in which an organ transplant functions normally by acquiring resistance to immune-mediated injury (especially), despite the presence of anti-transplant antibodies in the recipient. This status is associated with several modifications in the recipient as well as in the graft, such as previous depletion of anti-graft antibodies and their slow return once the graft is placed; expression of several protective genes in the graft; a Th2 immune response in the recipient; and inhibition of the membrane attack complex of complement.

Accommodation in organ transplantation

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

We review recent insights into the mechanisms and prevalence of accommodation. Accommodation refers to an acquired resistance of an organ graft to humoral injury and rejection.

RECENT FINDINGS

Accommodation has been postulated to reflect changes in antibodies, control of complement and/or acquired resistance to injury by antibodies, complement or other factors. We discuss the importance of these mechanisms, highlighting new conclusions.

SUMMARY

Accommodation may be a common, perhaps the most common, outcome of organ transplantation and, in some systems, a predictable outcome of organ xenotransplantation. Further understanding of how accommodation is induced and by what mechanisms it is manifest and maintained could have a profound impact on transplantation in general and perhaps on other fields.

Accommodation of grafts: implications for health and disease

Accommodation refers to the acquired resistance of a graft to immune-mediated injury. It is typically observed after antibodies that would cause rejection of a graft are removed from a recipient and then later return. In addition to being induced in this manner, accommodation can occur spontaneously, without depleting antibodies. Indeed, we postulate spontaneous accommodation may be the most common outcome of clinical organ transplantation. The paper reviews the current understanding of accommodation, emphasizing recent advances and important questions. Among the recent advances are the discoveries of potentially broader relevance of accommodation for biology and immunology and pathways by which accommodation may be achieved. To investigate these pathways and to understand how accommodation begins and how it evolves, clinical organ transplants might offer a useful and incisive model.