Severe venoocclusive disease after liver transplantation treated with transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt

Early-onset hepatic veno-occlusive disease after liver transplantation: an institutional experience and analysis of a literature-based cohort

PURPOSE

Hepatic veno-occlusive disease (HVOD) after liver transplantation (LT) is almost always a fatal complication. We assessed the outcomes of HVOD in a single institute and analyzed a literature-based cohort.

METHODS

We reviewed the medical records of recipients of LT performed between 1995 and 2020 at our institute and the literature on HVOD after LT. We then analyzed the clinical features based on a "pooled" cohort of cases identified in our institute and reported in the literature.

RESULTS

HVOD was diagnosed in 3 of 331 LT recipients, all of whom died in hospital, on days 164, 12, and 13, respectively. Our comprehensive review of the literature, as well as our cases, identified eight cases of HVOD that developed within 14 days after LT (early-onset type). Early-onset HVOD had a significantly worse prognosis than HVOD that developed beyond 2 weeks after LT (non-early-onset type), which was identified in 22 cases (25.0% vs. 86.1% of the 3-month graft survival rate). The most common causes of early-onset and non-early-onset types were acute cellular rejection (50%) and drug-induced disease (50%), respectively.

CONCLUSION

Early-onset HVOD developing within 14 days after LT has a poor prognosis.

Implantation of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS): indication and patient selection

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This review summarizes indications and contraindications for implantation of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS). Further, patient selection strategies are discussed.

RECENT FINDINGS

TIPS implantation is a highly effective treatment for portal hypertension. Main indications are ascites and variceal bleeding in patients with liver cirrhosis. There is growing evidence that early TIPS implantation after variceal bleeding is associated with an improved survival (preemptive TIPS).Preliminary data also suggest that an analogous concept of early TIPS implantation may be beneficial for patients with ascites. Further, well-selected patients with acute or chronic nonmalignant portal vein thrombosis can be effectively treated with TIPS implantation. In contrast, there is generally no recommendation for TIPS implantation in patients with hepatic veno-occlusive disease, noncirrhotic portal hypertension or prior before surgery to avoid complications of portal hypertension. Apart from evidence-based patient selection, the newly developed FIPS score can be an objective component in decision-making.

SUMMARY

Consideration of well-established indications and contraindications for TIPS implantation as well as concise patient selection criteria are essential for an optimal outcome after TIPS implantation.

Prevalence and outcomes of patients with sinusoidal obstruction syndrome after liver transplantation: A ten year's experience of a third-level Centre in Japan

BACKGROUND

Sinusoidal obstruction syndrome (SOS) after liver transplantation (LT) is a rare and potentially lethal complication. We retrospectively reviewed the outcomes of patients with post-transplant SOS.

METHODS

Between May 2001 and December 2019, of 332 patients who underwent LT, 5 (1.5%) developed SOS. The median age at LT was 1.7 years (range 0.1-66.5). SOS was histopathologically diagnosed and classified as early-onset (<1 month) or late-onset.

RESULTS

The median time to diagnosis of SOS was one month after LT. All patients developed acute cellular rejection before SOS, and the cause of SOS was acute cellular rejection in four patients and unknown in one. The treatment of SOS included conversion to tacrolimus from cyclosporine, intrahepatic hepatic vein stent placement, strengthening of immunosuppression, and plasma exchange. The 5-year graft survival rates in patients with and without SOS were 53.0% and 92.5%, respectively (p < 0.001). Of three patients with early-onset SOS, two patients improved and are doing well, and one patient died of graft failure four months after LT.

CONCLUSIONS

The cause and treatment of post-transplant SOS are not yet defined. The poor outcomes in patients with early-onset SOS may be improved by strengthening of immunosuppression. Patients with late-onset SOS are ultimately treated by repeat LT.

Successful defibrotide treatment of a patient with veno-occlusive disease after living-donor liver transplantation: A case report

RATIONALE

Veno-occlusive disease (VOD) is characterized by painful hepatomegaly, ascites, weight gain, and jaundice with nonthrombotic, fibrous obliteration of the centrilobular hepatic veins. VOD after liver transplantation is a rare complication, with an incidence of approximately 2%; however, it can be life-threatening in severe cases. The precise etiology and mechanism of VOD after liver transplantation remains unclear. Acute cellular rejection, antibody-mediated rejection, and treatment with tacrolimus or azathioprine may be associated with the development of VOD after liver transplantation. Additionally, the optimal treatment of VOD after liver transplantation has not yet been established and focuses on supportive care. Defibrotide is an anti-ischemic and antithrombotic drug with no systemic anticoagulant effects. Moreover, only a few reports have investigated the use of defibrotide for VOD after liver transplantation, which has shown promising results.

PATIENT CONCERNS

A 39-year-old woman with primary biliary cholangitis underwent living-donor liver transplantation at our center. She experienced right upper quadrant pain with increased ascites, pleural effusion, and weight gain on postoperative day 14.

DIAGNOSES

Imaging and pathological tests showed no evidence of rejection or vessel complications. VOD was diagnosed clinically based on the findings of weight gain, ascites, jaundice, and pathological biopsy.

INTERVENTIONS

Defibrotid, 25 mg/kg/day, was administered intravenously for 21 days.

OUTCOMES

She showed complete clinical resolution of the VOD.

LESSONS

Herein, we report a case of successful defibrotide treatment of VOD after living-donor liver transplantation.

Outcomes of combination treatment with MARS and TIPS for hepatic veno-occlusive disease: a report of 12 cases

BACKGROUND

In patients with acute liver injury caused by hepatic veno-occlusive disease (HVOD), molecular adsorbent recirculation system (MARS) may be used to improve liver function in conjunction with transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) to reduce portal hypertension.

METHODS

Twelve patients were admitted to our hospital following treatment for HVOD for 10 to 21 days at other hospitals. All patients were treated with a combination of MARS and TIPS, and they were evaluated clinically including liver function tests.

RESULTS

After the initial treatment with MARS, liver function improved significantly in all patients. TIPS placement decreased the hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) to 10.17 ± 2.26 mmHg from a pre-TIPS HVPG of 23.58 ± 9.43 mmHg. The outcomes of combination treatment with MARS and TIPS in 12 patients with HVOD were as follows: 1) improvement of various clinical and biological parameters leading to full recovery in 1 year in 6 patients; 2) full recovery following liver transplantation for acute liver failure in three patients; and 3) three patients died due to hepatic failure after TIPS placement.

CONCLUSION

The combination of MARS and TIPS creation is promising as a potential treatment for acute HVOD, and it showed an improvement in overall survival.

Long-Term Outcome of Veno-Occlusive Disease After Liver Transplant: A Retrospective Single-Center Experience

OBJECTIVES

Veno-occlusive disease after liver transplant has been sporadically reported, and significant uncertainty exists concerning the best treatment and the long-term outcomes. Here, we reviewed our experience to evaluate clinical presentation, treatment, and the long-term outcomes of these patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Between 2000 and 2015, 2165 patients underwent liver transplant at our center. The incidence of veno-occlusive disease was 0.3% (7/2165).

RESULTS

Timing of veno-occlusive disease onset (median 4.7 mo; interquartile range, 2.5-11.1 mo) varied widely as did clinical presentation, which was characterized by a variable association of liver failure and portal hypertension and different disease pro-gression rates. In all cases, diagnosis of veno-occlusive disease was confirmed by liver biopsy. Six patients (85.7%) presented with veno-occlusive disease after a previous episode of acute cellular rejection. Three patients died due to veno-occlusive disease (n = 2) or due to hepatocellular carcinoma recurrence (n = 1). Two patients were treated by increasing immunosuppression and with interventional procedures (pleurodesis and transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt, respectively), and 2 had successful retransplants. 5-year patient and graft survival rates were 57.1% and 28.6%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

A tailored approach based on clinical features and including retransplant can achieve acceptable long-term survival in patients with veno-occlusive disease after liver transplant.

Consensus conference on TIPS management: Techniques, indications, contraindications

The trans jugular intrahepatic Porto systemic shunt (TIPS) is no longer viewed as a salvage therapy or a bridge to liver transplantation and is currently indicated for a number of conditions related to portal hypertension with positive results in survival. Moreover, the availability of self-expandable polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE)-covered endoprostheses has dramatically improved the long-term patency of TIPS. However, since the last updated International guidelines have been published (year 2009) new evidence have come, which have open the field to new indications and solved areas of uncertainty. On this basis, the Italian Association of the Study of the Liver (AISF), the Italian College of Interventional Radiology-Italian Society of Medical Radiology (ICIR-SIRM), and the Italian Society of Anesthesia, Analgesia and Intensive Care (SIAARTI) promoted a Consensus Conference on TIPS. Under the auspices of the three scientific societies, the consensus process started with the review of the literature by a scientific board of experts and ended with a formal consensus meeting in Bergamo on June 4th and 5th, 2015. The final statements presented here were graded according to quality of evidence and strength of recommendations and were approved by an independent jury. By highlighting strengths and weaknesses of current indications to TIPS, the recommendations of AISF-ICIR-SIRM-SIAARTI may represent the starting point for further studies.

Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunts in liver transplant recipients

The insertion of a transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) is a minimally invasive procedure used to relieve the signs and symptoms of portal hypertension in patients with liver disease. The most common indications for placement are refractory ascites and variceal hemorrhage. In properly selected candidates, TIPS placement can serve as a bridge to liver transplantation. Expertise in TIPS placement after transplantation has significantly increased, which has allowed the procedure to become a viable option for retransplant candidates suffering the consequences of recurrent portal hypertension due to portal vein thrombosis, recurrent liver disease, or hepatic venous outflow obstruction (HVOO). However, TIPSs in liver transplant recipients are associated with a lower clinical response rate and a higher rate of complications in comparison with patients with native liver disease, and they are, therefore, generally reserved for patients with a Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) score ≤ 15 and ≤ 12 in patients with HCV. The role of TIPS placement in nonliver transplant recipients has been well studied in large trials, and it translates well into clinical applicability to candidates for orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT). However, the experience with OLT recipients is heterogeneous and restricted to small series. Thus, we focus here on reviewing the current literature and discussing the proper use of TIPSs in liver transplant recipients.

Devastating outflow obstruction after pediatric split liver transplantation

HVOO is a rare complication after pediatric LT, which may lead to graft failure. There are various causes of HVOO, such as mechanical anastomotic obstruction and SOS. A 10-month-old female underwent split LT from a deceased donor for ALF. Her postoperative course was uneventful. However, her liver function suddenly deteriorated a month later. A liver biopsy revealed centrilobular injury, and D-US suggested outflow obstruction. Venography was performed to reveal hepatic venous narrowing inside the graft. She received another graft from a living donor because of progressive graft failure in spite of successful venoplasty with stent insertion. The macroscopic findings of the explanted graft did not show an anastomotic stricture of the hepatic vein, although the pathological findings revealed necrosis of the first graft due to SOS. SOS might cause severe consequences with concomitant mechanical outflow obstruction after pediatric LT.

Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt for the treatment of sinusoidal obstruction syndrome in a liver transplant recipient and review of the literature

Sinusoidal obstruction syndrome (SOS) is a rare, life-threatening clinical syndrome resulting from sinusoidal congestion, and it is characterized by hepatomegaly, ascites, weight gain, and jaundice. The frequency of this condition after liver transplantation (LT) is low, but when SOS is severe and refractory to medical therapy, the ultimate solution is retransplantation. We describe a patient with SOS after LT who was successfully treated by the placement of a transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS). Although information on this approach is scarce because of the low incidence of SOS in LT patients, we review the available literature on treating this condition with a TIPS. On the basis of the reported information and our patient's outcome, we suggest that prompt TIPS placement can be considered for SOS when medical treatment fails. Nonetheless, a formal assessment and prospective studies are needed to confidently indicate TIPS placement in this situation.

Significance of isolated hepatic veno-occlusive disease/sinusoidal obstruction syndrome after liver transplantation

After liver transplantation (LT), hepatic veno-occlusive disease (VOD), which is also known as sinusoidal obstruction syndrome (SOS), has been reported initially in relation to azathioprine use and subsequently in relation to acute rejection (AR). Isolated veno-occlusive disease (iVOD)/SOS raises some questions about its significance and especially its treatment. From the post-LT biopsy samples of 1364 patients (2000-2008), 31 patients with index biopsy samples showing VOD/SOS (2.3%) were identified. After a review of the index biopsy samples and previous biopsy samples, those patients not exposed to azathioprine therapy were subdivided into 2 groups according to the absence or presence of AR. Fifteen of the 31 patients had no previous evidence of AR, whereas 16 experienced episodes of AR (before or concurrently with VOD). The 2 groups were similar in terms of demographic and clinical data and the range of histological centrilobular changes. AR episodes were characterized by an endothelial predilection. iVOD/SOS occurred later than acute rejection-related veno-occlusive disease (AR-VOD)/SOS (mean times of 65 and 4.4 months, respectively, P = 0.0098). There was a tendency for iVOD/SOS to progress less frequently to chronic rejection in comparison with AR-VOD/SOS (3/15 versus 9/15, P = 0.06). The histological resolution of iVOD/SOS was significantly more frequent in patients who benefited from increased immunosuppression in comparison with those who did not (5/7 versus 2/8, P = 0.05). When the groups were considered together, the same result was obtained (14/18 versus 4/12, P = 0.024). In conclusion, despite a constant overall prevalence of VOD/SOS, the proportion of iVOD/SOS has increased. The histological resolution of iVOD/SOS after increase in immunosuppression suggests an immune-mediated origin. Better optimization of immunosuppression may be a curative treatment.

Rescue of a marginal liver graft by sequential treatment with molecular adsorbent recirculating system and transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt: a case report

A 53-year-old man with alcoholic liver cirrhosis underwent orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) using a marginal graft. Persistent cholestasis post-OLT was successfully treated using a molecular adsorbent recirculating system (MARS). Afterwards, the patient developed refractory ascites, which was controlled by a transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS). TIPS reduction and eventually occlusion was necessary due to the development of encephalopathy. Despite TIPS occlusion, the ascites did not relapse probably because of the onset of other adaptive mechanisms. MARS and TIPS used sequentially were capable of rescuing a liver graft, thereby avoiding the morbidity and mortality associated with early retransplantation and sparing a liver graft from the donor pool.

Intractable ascites without mechanical vascular obstruction after orthotopic liver transplantation: etiology and clinical outcome of sinusoidal obstruction syndrome

Intractable ascites after orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) is a relatively rare complication. However, it often takes a life threatening course, which requires re-transplantation. In previous studies, several reports gave hepatic sinusoidal obstruction syndrome (SOS) as one of the causes of refractory ascites. However, the detailed etiology of SOS after OLT and its association with clinical consequences remain unclear because there have been few studies to date. We report two recent cases with rapidly progressive refractory ascites associated with SOS, following completely different clinical courses. In case 1, the first episode of acute allograft rejection triggered SOS and subsequent intractable ascites, while the second acute rejection worsened his clinical status. A transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic stent-shunt (TIPS) was placed and this procedure resulted in complete disappearance of ascites and of renal dysfunction. In contrast, refractory ascites in case 2, who had neither rejection nor mechanical outlet obstruction, worsened despite TIPS stent placement, and re-transplantation was necessary. We speculate that the pre-existing diseased liver of the cadaver donor caused this serious complication, necessitating a second graft.

Veno-occlusive disease of the liver after lung transplantation

Veno-occlusive disease (VOD) of the liver is mainly described after chemo-irradiation conditioning regimens during haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (SCT) and has been sporadically reported after kidney and liver transplantation. In the latter cases, it is commonly attributed to azathioprine and/or tacrolimus. One case of tacrolimus-induced hepatic VOD developing after lung transplantation (LT) has been recently reported. Here we describe another case of VOD occurring after LT, but in which the causative role was played by azathioprine.

Veno occlusive disease: update on clinical management

Hepatic veno-occlusive disease is a clinical syndrome characterized by hepatomegaly, ascites, weight gain and jaundice, due to sinusoidal congestion which can be caused by alkaloid ingestion, but the most frequent cause is haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (STC) and is also seen after solid organ transplantation. The incidence of veno occlusive disease (VOD) after STC ranges from 0 to 70%, but is decreasing. Survival is good when VOD is a mild form, but when it is severe and associated with an increase of hepatic venous pressure gradient > 20 mmHg, and mortality is about 90%. Prevention remains the best therapeutic strategy, by using non-myeloablative conditioning regimens before STC. Prophylactic administration of ursodeoxycholic acid, being an antioxidant and antiapoptotic agent, can have some benefit in reducing overall mortality. Defibrotide, which has pro-fibrinolytic and antithrombotic properties, is the most effective therapy; decompression of the sinusoids by a transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) can be tried, especially to treat VOD after liver transplantation and when multiorgan failure (MOF) is not present. Liver transplantation can be the last option, but can not be considered a standard rescue therapy, because usually the concomitant presence of multiorgan failure contraindicates this procedure.