Portopulmonary Hypertension in the Early Phase Following Liver Transplantation

The Edge of Unknown: Postoperative Critical Care in Liver Transplantation

Perioperative care of patients undergoing liver transplantation (LT) is very complex. Metabolic derangements, hypothermia, coagulopathy and thromboses, severe infections, and graft dysfunction can affect outcomes. In this manuscript, we discuss several perioperative problems that can be encountered in LT recipients. The authors present the most up-to-date information regarding predicting and treating hemodynamic instability, coagulation monitoring and management, postoperative ventilation strategies and early extubation, management of infections, and ESLD-related pulmonary complications. In addition, early post-transplant allograft dysfunction will be discussed.

Portopulmonary Hypertension: A Review of the Current Literature

Portopulmonary hypertension is defined as the development of pulmonary arterial hypertension in the setting of portal hypertension with or without liver cirrhosis. Portal hypertension-associated haemodynamic changes, including hyperdynamic state, portosystemic shunts and splanchnic vasodilation, induce significant alterations in pulmonary vascular bed and play a pivotal role in the pathogenesis of the disease. If left untreated, portopulmonary hypertension results in progressive right heart failure, with a poor prognosis. Although Doppler echocardiography is the best initial screening tool for symptomatic patients and liver transplantation candidates, right heart catheterisation remains the gold standard for the diagnosis of the disease. Severe portopulmonary hypertension exerts a prohibitive risk to liver transplantation by conferring an elevated perioperative mortality risk. It is important for haemodynamic parameters to correspond with non-severe portopulmonary hypertension before patients can proceed with the liver transplantation. Small uncontrolled studies and a recent randomised controlled trial have reported promising results with vasodilatory therapies in clinical and haemodynamic improvement of patients, allowing a proportion of patients to undergo liver transplantation. In this review, the epidemiology, pathogenesis, diagnostic approach and management of portopulmonary hypertension are discussed. We also highlight fields of ongoing investigation pertinent to risk stratification and optimal patient selection to maximise long-term benefit from currently available treatments.

Doppler trans-thoracic echocardiography for detection of pulmonary hypertension in adults

BACKGROUND

Pulmonary hypertension (PH) is an important cause of morbidity and mortality, which leads to a substantial loss of exercise capacity. PH ultimately leads to right ventricular overload and subsequent heart failure and early death. Although early detection and treatment of PH are recommended, due to the limited responsiveness to therapy at late disease stages, many patients are diagnosed at a later stage of the disease because symptoms and signs of PH are nonspecific at earlier stages. While direct pressure measurement with right-heart catheterisation is the clinical reference standard for PH, it is not routinely used due to its invasiveness and complications. Trans-thoracic Doppler echocardiography is less invasive, less expensive, and widely available compared to right-heart catheterisation; it is therefore recommended that echocardiography be used as an initial diagnosis method in guidelines. However, several studies have questioned the accuracy of noninvasively measured pulmonary artery pressure. There is substantial uncertainty about the diagnostic accuracy of echocardiography for the diagnosis of PH.

OBJECTIVES

To determine the diagnostic accuracy of trans-thoracic Doppler echocardiography for detecting PH.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science Core Collection, ClinicalTrials.gov, World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry Platform from database inception to August 2021, reference lists of articles, and contacted study authors. We applied no restrictions on language or type of publication.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included studies that evaluated the diagnostic accuracy of trans-thoracic Doppler echocardiography for detecting PH, where right-heart catheterisation was the reference standard. We excluded diagnostic case-control studies (two-gate design), studies where right-heart catheterisation was not the reference standard, and those in which the reference standard threshold differed from 25 mmHg. We also excluded studies that did not provide sufficient diagnostic test accuracy data (true-positive [TP], false-positive [FP], true-negative [TN], and false-negative [FN] values, based on the reference standard). We included studies that provided data from which we could extract TP, FP, TN, and FN values, based on the reference standard. Two authors independently screened and assessed the eligibility based on the titles and abstracts of records identified by the search. After the title and abstract screening, the full-text reports of all potentially eligible studies were obtained, and two authors independently assessed the eligibility of the full-text reports.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently assessed the risk of bias and extracted data from each of the included studies. We contacted the authors of the included studies to obtain missing data. We assessed the methodological quality of studies using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (QUADAS-2) tool. We estimated a summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) curve by fitting a hierarchical summary ROC (HSROC) non-linear mixed model. We explored sources of heterogeneity regarding types of PH, methods to estimate the right atrial pressure, and threshold of index test to diagnose PH. All analyses were performed using the Review Manager 5, SAS and STATA statistical software.

MAIN RESULTS

We included 17 studies (comprising 3656 adult patients) assessing the diagnostic accuracy of Doppler trans-thoracic echocardiography for the diagnosis of PH. The included studies were heterogeneous in terms of patient distribution of age, sex, WHO classification, setting, country, positivity threshold, and year of publication. The prevalence of PH reported in the included studies varied widely (from 6% to 88%). The threshold of index test for PH diagnosis varied widely (from 30 mmHg to 47 mmHg) and was not always prespecified. No study was assigned low risk of bias or low concern in each QUADAS-2 domain assessed. Poor reporting, especially in the index test and reference standard domains, hampered conclusive judgement about the risk of bias. There was little consistency in the thresholds used in the included studies; therefore, common thresholds contained very sparse data, which prevented us from calculating summary points of accuracy estimates. With a fixed specificity of 86% (the median specificity), the estimated sensitivity derived from the median value of specificity using HSROC model was 87% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 78% to 96%). Using a prevalence of PH of 68%, which was the median among the included studies conducted mainly in tertiary hospitals, diagnosing a cohort of 1000 adult patients under suspicion of PH would result in 88 patients being undiagnosed with PH (false negatives) and 275 patients would avoid unnecessary referral for a right-heart catheterisation (true negatives). In addition, 592 of 1000 patients would receive an appropriate and timely referral for a right-heart catheterisation (true positives), while 45 patients would be wrongly considered to have PH (false positives). Conversely, when we assumed low prevalence of PH (10%), as in the case of preoperative examinations for liver transplantation, the number of false negatives and false positives would be 13 and 126, respectively.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Our evidence assessment of echocardiography for the diagnosis of PH in adult patients revealed several limitations. We were unable to determine the average sensitivity and specificity at any particular index test threshold and to explain the observed variability in results. The high heterogeneity of the collected data and the poor methodological quality would constrain the implementation of this result into clinical practice. Further studies relative to the accuracy of Doppler trans-thoracic echocardiography for the diagnosis of PH in adults, that apply a rigorous methodology for conducting diagnostic test accuracy studies, are needed.

Role of echocardiography in screening for portopulmonary hypertension in liver transplant candidates: a meta-analysis

Objectives

To demonstrate the screening value of echocardiography for portopulmonary hypertension (POPH) in liver transplant candidates.

Design

Systematic review and meta-analysis.

Background

POPH is a complication of end-stage liver disease that adversely affects the outcome of orthotopic liver transplant. There are no specific symptoms in the early stage of POPH. POPH reduce the survival rate of patients with end-stage liver disease specially if they are not diagnosed. Therefore, early detection may improve prognosis. The objective of this study is to explore the screening value of echocardiography on liver transplant candidates for screening of POPH compared to right heart catheterization (RHC).

Method

PubMed, EMBASE and the Cochrane Library were searched by two independent reviewers for potentially eligible studies published up to 30 June 2019 to retrieve data based on per-patient analysis. STATA, Meta-DiSc, and RevMan were applied to perform this meta-analysis.

Results

Our search yielded 1576 studies, of which 11 satisfied the inclusion criteria. The pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio (PLR), negative likelihood ratio (NLR) and area under the summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) curve (AUC) of echocardiography for POPH were 0.85 (95% CI [0.65–0.94]), 0.83 (95% CI [0.73–0.90]), 4.99 (95% CI [3.03–8.21]), 0.19 (95% CI [0.07–0.46]), and 0.91 (95% CI [0.88–0.93]), respectively. Deeks’ funnel plot did not indicate the existence of publication bias (P = 0.66).

Conclusions

Echocardiography, a noninvasive modality, provides superior screening for POPH, but the diagnosis of POPH still requires RHC. PROSPERO registration number CRD42019144589.

Pulmonary Complications of Portal Hypertension

The most common pulmonary complications of chronic liver disease are hepatic hydrothorax, hepatopulmonary syndrome, and portopulmonary hypertension. Hepatic hydrothorax is a transudative pleural effusion in a patient with cirrhosis and no evidence of underlying cardiopulmonary disease. Hepatic hydrothorax develops owing to the movement of ascitic fluid into the pleural space. Hepatopulmonary syndrome and portopulmonary hypertension are pathologically linked by the presence of portal hypertension; however, their pathophysiologic mechanisms are significantly different. Hepatopulmonary syndrome is characterized by low pulmonary vascular resistance secondary to intrapulmonary vascular dilatations and hypoxemia; portopulmonary hypertension features elevated pulmonary vascular resistance and constriction/obstruction within the pulmonary vasculature.

The early outcomes of candidates with portopulmonary hypertension after liver transplantation

Background

Portopulmonary hypertension (PPH) was once regarded as a contraindicaton to liver transplantation (LT). However, growing evidence has indicated that PPH patients undergoing LT may show similar outcomes compared to those without PPH, and researchers have recommended it not be an absolute contraindication. Given this controversy, we aimed to identify and review the current evidence on this topic and to provide a comparison of the outcomes after LT between candidates with PPH and those without.

Methods

We systematically searched the MEDLINE, EMBASE and Cochrane Library databases for all studies that compared the outcomes of PPH patients and those without PPH after LT. All studies reporting outcomes of PPH patients versus those without PPH (Control) were further considered for inclusion in this meta-analysis. Odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated to compare the pooled data between PPH and Control groups.

Results

Eleven retrospective trials and one prospective, randomized, controlled trial, involving 37,686 transplant recipients were included. The PPH patients had increased 1-year mortality with an OR of 1.59 (95% CI = 1.26–2.01, P = 0.0001) compared to the control group. There was no significant difference in graft loss and 30-day mortality after LT between the two groups.

Conclusions

Patients with PPH who underwent LT had increased 1-year mortality compared to those without PPH, while graft loss and 30-day mortality were similar. Nevertheless, LT may be a reasonable therapeutic option for some patients with PPH, but further studies are needed to identify those select patients with PPH who would benefit most from LT.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1186/s12876-018-0797-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Current Approach to the Diagnosis and Management of Portopulmonary Hypertension

Portopulmonary hypertension (POPH) is a form of pulmonary arterial hypertension occurring in the setting of portal hypertension with or without hepatic cirrhosis. The presence of both portal and pulmonary vascular disease contributes to complicated hemodynamics and therapeutic challenges, though the severities do not appear to correlate directly. Diagnosis of POPH, and distinction from the commonly observed hyperdynamic state of end-stage liver disease, is typically accomplished with an initial screening transthoracic echocardiogram, followed by right heart catheterization for confirmation of hemodynamic parameters. Though few studies have directly evaluated use in POPH, pulmonary artery-directed therapy is the cornerstone of management, along with consideration of liver transplantation. Perioperative and long-term outcomes are variable, but uniformly worse in the setting of uncontrolled pulmonary pressures. Risk stratification and optimal patient selection for these interventions are areas of ongoing investigation.

Portopulmonary hypertension

Portopulmonary hypertension (PoPH) refers to the condition that pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) occur in the stetting of portal hypertension. The development of PoPH is thought to be independent of the severity of portal hypertension or the etiology or severity of liver disease. PoPH results from excessive vasoconstriction, vascular remodeling, and proliferative and thrombotic events within the pulmonary circulation that lead to progressive right ventricular failure and ultimately to death. Untreated PoPH is associated with a poor prognosis. As PoPH is frequently asymptomatic or symptoms are generally non-specific, patients should be actively screened for the presence of PoPH. Two-dimensional transthoracic echocardiography is a useful non-invasive screening tool, but a definitive diagnosis requires invasive hemodynamic confirmation by right heart catheterization. Despite a dearth of randomized, prospective data, an ever-expanding clinical experience shows that patients with PoPH benefit from therapy with PAH-specific medications including with endothelin receptor antagonists, phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitors, and/or prostanoids. Due to high perioperative mortality, transplantation should be avoided in those patients who have severe PoPH that is refractory to medical therapy.

Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation and Severe Portopulmonary Hypertension following Liver Transplantation: Brief Report

Background

Patients with severe portopulmonary hypertension (PoPH) responsive to medical therapy may be considered for liver transplantation. We present a case of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) resuscitation for PoPH crisis in a child following liver transplantation (LT), and review the literature on management of this challenging setting.

Case report

A 7-year-old girl, with previous Kasai portoenterostomy and subsequent severe PoPH responsive to pulmonary vasodilator therapy, underwent orthotopic LT. Five days following surgery, she had an asystolic arrest with suprasystemic pulmonary hypertension, and was resuscitated with ECMO therapy. Multi-modal strategies included sildenafil, ambrisentan, nitric oxide, intravenous Epoprostenol infusion, levosimendan, and atrial septostomy. Ten days after her LT, exploration for bleeding was necessary following abdominal drain removal. By 10 days of ECMO support, she was reviewed and considered for lung transplantation. Unfortunately, she deteriorated precipitously with abdominal compartment syndrome and multi-organ failure; sadly, life support was withdrawn 23 days after transplantation.

Discussion

Patients with severe PoPH may need combined thoracic organ and liver transplantation either at single or serial events. Case reports on ECMO use include resuscitation after massive pulmonary embolism during liver transplantation, bridge until the goal of vasodilatory therapy was reached in worsening PoPH following LT, and bridge to lung or repeat liver transplantation for severe pulmonary hypertension.

Conclusions

ECMO resuscitation and support may be deployed as rescue therapy around the period of liver transplantation. We highlight the importance of patient selection and high risk of complications during ECMO therapy as a bridge to PoPH control.

Portopulmonary hypertension

Portopulmonary hypertension (POPH) is the presence of pulmonary arterial hypertension in patients with portal hypertension. Among liver transplant (LT) candidates, reported incidence rates of POPH range from 4.5% to 8.5%. In patients with LT, intraoperative death and immediate post-LT mortality are feared clinical events when transplantation is attempted in the setting of untreated, moderate to severe POPH; therefore, POPH precludes LT unless the mean pulmonary artery pressure can be reduced to a safe level and right ventricular function optimized. Specific pulmonary artery vasodilator medications seem effective in reducing pulmonary artery pressures and improving right ventricular function and survival.

Venous outflow obstruction and portopulmonary hypertension after orthotopic liver transplantation

Patient: Female, 54

Final Diagnosis: Suprahepatic inferior vena cava anastomosis stricture

Symptoms: Ascites • fatigue • lower limb edema • hepatomegaly

Medication: —

Clinical Procedure: —

Specialty: Transplantology • Critical Care Medicine

Preoperative Assessment and Management of Liver Transplant Candidates With Portopulmonary Hypertension

Pulmonary artery hypertension (PAH) that occurs as a consequence of portal hypertension is termed portopulmonary hypertension (POPH) and is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Among liver transplant (LT) candidates, reported incidence rates of POPH range from 4.5% to 8.5%. The severity of POPH is unrelated to the severity of portal hypertension or the liver disease. In LT patients, intraoperative death and immediate post-LT mortality are feared clinical events when transplantation is attempted in the setting of untreated, moderate to severe POPH. Specific pulmonary artery vasodilator medications (PAH-specific therapy) appear effective in reducing pulmonary artery pressures, improving right ventricular (RV) function and survival. Thus, screening for and accurately diagnosing POPH prior to LT has become a standard of care. The post-LT course of patients with moderate POPH is unpredictable, but most patients can be weaned from PAH-specific therapy over time. In this article, we present an overview of the preoperative assessment of POPH with an emphasis on risk assessment for transplant and the most recent medical treatment options.

The heart in liver transplantation

The heart and liver are organs that are closely related in both health and disease. Patients who undergo liver transplantation may suffer from heart disease that is: (a) related to the original cause of the liver disease such as hemochromatosis, (b) related to the liver disease itself, or (c) related to other associated conditions. Furthermore, liver transplantation is one of the most cardiovascular stressful events that a patient with cirrhosis may undergo. After liver transplantation, the progression of pre-existing or the development of new-onset cardiac disease may occur. This article reviews the relationship between the heart and liver transplantation in the pre-transplant, intra-operative, and post-transplant periods.

Coexisting hepatopulmonary syndrome and portopulmonary hypertension: implications for liver transplantation

Hepatopulmonary syndrome (HPS) and portopulmonary hypertension (POPH) represent pulmonary complications of liver disease and portal hypertension. The underlying pathophysiology behind these entities is complex and involves different effects of vasoactive substances on the pulmonary vasculature, among them endothelin-1 and nitric oxide (NO). Hepatopulmonary syndrome results from vasodilation, intrapulmonary shunting, and hypoxia. In contrast, portopulmonary hypertension is predominantly owing to generalized vasoconstriction that leads to remodeling and an increase in pulmonary vascular resistance, but is rarely associated with hypoxia. We present a case report in which these 2 processes with opposing pathologic mechanisms coexist in the same patient. We also conducted a literature search to identify other documented cases of coexisting hepatopulmonary syndrome and portopulmonary hypertension, common clinical features of these patients, and outcomes with or without treatment. Our case highlights the importance of recognizing the coexistence of these 2 disease processes, as they may occur simultaneously and affect the approach to treatment, including liver transplantation.

Management strategies for patients with pulmonary hypertension in the intensive care unit

OBJECTIVE

Pulmonary hypertension may be encountered in the intensive care unit in patients with critical illnesses such as acute respiratory distress syndrome, left ventricular dysfunction, and pulmonary embolism, as well as after cardiothoracic surgery. Pulmonary hypertension also may be encountered in patients with preexisting pulmonary vascular, lung, liver, or cardiac diseases. The intensive care unit management of patients can prove extremely challenging, particularly when they become hemodynamically unstable. The objective of this review is to discuss the pathogenesis and physiology of pulmonary hypertension and the utility of various diagnostic tools, and to provide recommendations regarding the use of vasopressors and pulmonary vasodilators in intensive care.

DATA SOURCES AND EXTRACTION

We undertook a comprehensive review of the literature regarding the management of pulmonary hypertension in the setting of critical illness. We performed a MEDLINE search of articles published from January 1970 to March 2007. Medical subject headings and keywords searched and cross-referenced with each other were: pulmonary hypertension, vasopressor agents, therapeutics, critical illness, intensive care, right ventricular failure, mitral stenosis, prostacyclin, nitric oxide, sildenafil, dopamine, dobutamine, phenylephrine, isoproterenol, and vasopressin. Both human and animal studies related to pulmonary hypertension were reviewed.

CONCLUSIONS

Pulmonary hypertension presents a particular challenge in critically ill patients, because typical therapies such as volume resuscitation and mechanical ventilation may worsen hemodynamics in patients with pulmonary hypertension and right ventricular failure. Patients with decompensated pulmonary hypertension, including those with pulmonary hypertension associated with cardiothoracic surgery, require therapy for right ventricular failure. Very few human studies have addressed the use of vasopressors and pulmonary vasodilators in these patients, but the use of dobutamine, milrinone, inhaled nitric oxide, and intravenous prostacyclin have the greatest support in the literature. Treatment of pulmonary hypertension resulting from critical illness or chronic lung diseases should address the primary cause of hemodynamic deterioration, and pulmonary vasodilators usually are not necessary.