Compensation of Intraoperative Transcranial Motor-Evoked Potential Monitoring by Compound Muscle Action Potential After Peripheral Nerve Stimulation

Anesthetic Fade in Intraoperative Transcranial Motor Evoked Potential Monitoring Is Mainly due to Decreased Synaptic Transmission at the Neuromuscular Junction by Propofol Accumulation

BACKGROUND

 We previously reported that normalization of motor evoked potential (MEP) monitoring amplitude by compound muscle action potential (CMAP) after peripheral nerve stimulation prevented the expression of anesthetic fade (AF), suggesting that AF might be due to reduced synaptic transfer in the neuromuscular junction.

METHODS

 We calculated the time at which AF began for each of craniotomy and spinal cord surgery, and examined whether AF was avoided by CMAP after peripheral nerve stimulation normalization in each. Similar studies were also made with respect to the upper and lower limb muscles.

RESULTS

 AF was observed in surgery lasting 160 minutes for craniotomy and 260 minutes or more for spinal surgery, and 195 minutes in the upper limb muscles and 135 minutes in the lower limb muscles. In all the series, AF could be avoided by CMAP after peripheral nerve stimulation normalization.

CONCLUSION

 AF of MEP occurred in both craniotomy and spinal cord surgery, and it was also corrected by CMAP after peripheral nerve stimulation. AF is considered to be mainly due to a decrease in synaptic transfer of the neuromuscular junction due to the accumulation of propofol because of the avoidance by CMAP normalization. However, it may be partially due to a decrease in the excitability of pyramidal tracts and α-motor neurons, because AF occurred earlier in the lower limb muscles than in the upper limb muscles.

White Cord Syndrome After Cervical Laminoplasty in an 81-Year-Old Man

White cord syndrome (WCS) shows high intramedullary signaling in T2-weighted MRI with worsening motor nerve symptoms after cervical spinal decompression surgery. It has been reported in only 13 cases. An 81-year-old man had numbness, weakness, and impaired fine motor control in both upper limbs for the previous five years. C3, C4, C6, open-door laminoplasty, and C5 laminectomy were performed. Intraoperative transcranial motor evoked potential normalization by compound muscle action potential showed an 80% reduction in amplitude in the right abductor pollicis brevis and a 96% reduction in the right abductor hallucis. Tetraplegia occurred immediately after the operation. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) on the day after the operation showed intramedullary T2 high signals at the C4 and C5 levels. According to Brunnstrom's staging, the upper and lower right limbs and the lower left limb were at stage two, and the upper left limb was at stage three, six months after the operation. Thirteen cases of WCS have been reported in the literature. These were thought to be caused by reperfusion due to decompression.

Need for head and neck repositioning to restore electrophysiological signal changes at positioning for cervical myelopathy surgery

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the incidence of significant intraoperative electrophysiological signal changes during surgical positioning, and to assess the effectiveness of head and neck repositioning on the restoration of signals, among patients undergoing surgery for cervical myelopathy.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We used multimodal intraoperative monitoring (somatosensory [SEP] and motor evoked potentials [MEP] and spontaneous electromyography) before and after patients' positioning in a consecutive cohort of 103 patients operated for symptomatic cervical myelopathy. Significant changes were defined as>50% attenuation in amplitude or>10% increase in latency of SEP, or abolishment or 50-80% attenuation of MEP.

RESULTS

Out of 103 patients (34.9% female, median age 54.5 years) 88 underwent laminectomy (85.4%) and 15 (14.6%) anterior approach. At the time of positioning, signal alterations occurred in 44 patients (42.7%), yet only 11 patients (10.7%) showed alarming changes. Immediate neck repositioning of these resulted in complete (n=6) or partial (n=4) restoration of potentials, yielding no postoperative deficits. The patient in which signals could not be restored after repositioning resulted in added postoperative deficit. The accuracy (true positives plus true negatives) of monitoring to detect new neurological deficits was 99.0% (102/103) for the entire cohort, and 100% (11/11) for those showing significant changes at the moment of positioning. Overall, only 1 patient, with non-significant SEP attenuation, experienced a new postoperative deficit, yielding a 0.97% rate of false negatives.

CONCLUSION

Among patients undergoing surgery for cervical myelopathy, 10.7% showed alarming electrophysiological signal changes at the time of positioning. Immediate repositioning of the neck resulted in near always restoration of potentials and avoidance of added neurological damage. Complete or partial restoration of potentials after repositioning yielded no postoperative deficits.

Effect of Compound Muscle Action Potential After Peripheral Nerve Stimulation Normalization on Anesthetic Fade of Intraoperative Transcranial Motor-Evoked Potential

PURPOSE

Anesthetic fade refers to the time-dependent decrease in the amplitude of the intraoperative motor-evoked potential. It is thought to be caused by the accumulation of propofol. The authors examined whether normalization by the compound muscle action potential (CMAP) after peripheral nerve stimulation could compensate for anesthetic fade.

METHODS

In 1,842 muscles in 578 surgeries, which did not exhibit a motor-neurologic change after the operation, the motor-evoked potential amplitude was normalized by the CMAP amplitude after peripheral nerve stimulation, and the CMAP amplitude and operation times were analyzed.

RESULTS

The amplitudes of both motor-evoked potential and CMAP increased over time after peripheral nerve stimulation because of the disappearance of muscle-relaxant action. Especially, after peripheral nerve stimulation, CMAP significantly increased from the beginning to the end of the operation. Anesthetic fade in transcranial motor-evoked potential monitoring seemed to occur at more than 235 minutes of surgery based on the results of a receiver operating characteristic analysis of the operation time and relative amplitudes. Although the mean amplitude without CMAP normalization at more than 235 minutes was significantly lower than that at less than 235 minutes, the mean amplitude with normalization by CMAP after peripheral nerve stimulation at more than 235 minutes was not significantly different from that at less than 235 minutes.

CONCLUSIONS

Compound muscle action potential after peripheral nerve stimulation normalization was able to avoid the effect of anesthetic fade. Anesthetic fade was seemed to be caused by a decrease in synaptic transmission at the neuromuscular junction because of propofol accumulation by this result.

Need for head and neck repositioning to restore electrophysiological signal changes at positioning for cervical myelopathy surgery

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the incidence of significant intraoperative electrophysiological signal changes during surgical positioning, and to assess the effectiveness of head and neck repositioning on the restoration of signals, among patients undergoing surgery for cervical myelopathy.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We used multimodal intraoperative monitoring (somatosensory [SEP] and motor evoked potentials [MEP] and spontaneous electromyography) before and after patients' positioning in a consecutive cohort of 103 patients operated for symptomatic cervical myelopathy. Significant changes were defined as>50% attenuation in amplitude or>10% increase in latency of SEP, or abolishment or 50-80% attenuation of MEP.

RESULTS

Out of 103 patients (34.9% female, median age 54.5 years) 88 underwent laminectomy (85.4%) and 15 (14.6%) anterior approach. At the time of positioning, signal alterations occurred in 44 patients (42.7%), yet only 11 patients (10.7%) showed alarming changes. Immediate neck repositioning of these resulted in complete (n=6) or partial (n=4) restoration of potentials, yielding no postoperative deficits. The patient in which signals could not be restored after repositioning resulted in added postoperative deficit. The accuracy (true positives plus true negatives) of monitoring to detect new neurological deficits was 99.0% (102/103) for the entire cohort, and 100% (11/11) for those showing significant changes at the moment of positioning. Overall, only 1 patient, with non-significant SEP attenuation, experienced a new postoperative deficit, yielding a 0.97% rate of false negatives.

CONCLUSION

Among patients undergoing surgery for cervical myelopathy, 10.7% showed alarming electrophysiological signal changes at the time of positioning. Immediate repositioning of the neck resulted in near always restoration of potentials and avoidance of added neurological damage. Complete or partial restoration of potentials after repositioning yielded no postoperative deficits.

Motor evoked potential monitoring can evaluate ischemic tolerance to carotid artery occlusion during surgery

Balloon test occlusion (BTO) is a useful examination for evaluating ischemic tolerance to internal carotid artery (ICA) occlusion. The aim of this study was to investigate the relationships between intraoperative motor evoked potential (MEP) monitoring and the results of preoperative BTO. Between 2013 and 2017, 32 patients undergoing surgery under general anesthesia with intraoperative MEP monitoring, in whom preoperative BTO was performed, were identified. A receiver operator characteristic (ROC) analysis was performed to determine the appropriate cutoff value of MEP amplitude for BTO-positive. Furthermore, the accuracy of MEP monitoring for BTO-positive was compared with electroencephalogram (EEG) and somatosensory evoked potential (SEP) monitoring. Four of 32 (12.5%) patients were BTO-positive. The cutoff value of MEP amplitude for BTO-positive was a > 80% reduction from the baseline level, which showed sensitivity of 100% and specificity of 100%. Thus, the sensitivity and specificity for BTO-positive were significantly higher for MEP than for EEG (100% and 72.0%, p = 0.02) in 28 patients, but they were not significantly different compared with SEP (33.3% and 100%, p = 0.48) in 21 patients. MEP monitoring might be one of the alternatives for evaluating ischemic tolerance to ICA occlusion during surgery. The cutoff value of MEP amplitude was a > 80% reduction.

Intraoperative Neurophysiologic Monitoring for Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy

Multimodal intraoperative neurophysiologic monitoring is a reliable tool for detecting intraoperative spine injury and is recommended during surgery for degenerative cervical myopathy (DCM). Somatosensory evoked potential (SEP) can be used to monitor spine and peripheral nerve injury during positioning in surgery for DCM. Compensation technique for transcranial evoked muscle action potentials (tcMEPs) should be adopted in intraoperative monitoring during surgery for DCM. Free-running electromyography is a useful real-time monitoring add-on modality in addition to SEP and tcMEP.

Transcranial magnetic stimulation--may be useful as a preoperative screen of motor tract function

Transcranial motor stimulation with noninvasive cortical surface stimulation, using a high-intensity magnetic field referred to as transcranial magnetic stimulation generally, is considered a nonpainful technique. In contrast, transcranial electric stimulation of the motor tracts typically cannot be done in unanesthesized patients. Intraoperative monitoring of motor tract function with transcranial electric stimulation is considered a standard practice in many institutions for patients during surgical procedures in which there is potential risk of motor tract impairment so that the risk of paraplegia or paraparesis can be reduced. Because transcranial electric stimulation cannot be typically done in the outpatient setting, transcranial magnetic stimulation may be able to provide a well-tolerated method for evaluation of the corticospinal motor tracts before surgery.

METHODS

One hundred fifty-five patients aged 5 to 20 years were evaluated preoperatively with single-stimulation nonrepetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for preoperative assessment.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS

The presence of responses to transcranial magnetic stimulation reliably predicted the presence of responses to transcranial electric stimulation intraoperatively. No complications occurred during the testing, and findings were correlated to the clinical history and used in the setup of the surgical monitoring.

Sensitivity and specificity in transcranial motor-evoked potential monitoring during neurosurgical operations

Background:

Intraoperative transcranial motor-evoked potential (TCMEP) monitoring is widely performed during neurosurgical operations. Sensitivity and specificity in TCMEP during neurosurgical operations were examined according to the type of operation.

Methods:

TCMEP monitoring was performed during 283 neurosurgical operations for patients without preoperative motor palsy, including 121 spinal operations, 84 cerebral aneurysmal operations, and 31 brain tumor operations. Transcranial stimulation at 100–600 V was applied by screw electrodes placed in the scalp and electromyographic responses were recorded with surface electrodes placed on the affected muscles. To exclude the effects of muscle relaxants on TCMEP, compound muscle action potential (CMAP) by supramaximal stimulation of the peripheral nerve immediately after transcranial stimulation was used for compensation of TCMEP.

Results:

In spinal operations, with an 80% reduction in amplitude as the threshold for motor palsy, the sensitivity and specificity with CMAP compensation were 100% and 96.4%, respectively. In aneurysmal operations, with a 70% reduction in amplitude as the threshold for motor palsy, the sensitivity and specificity with CMAP compensation were 100% and 94.8%, respectively. Compensation by CMAP was especially useful in aneurysmal operations. In all neurosurgical operations, with a 70% reduction in amplitude as the threshold for motor palsy, the sensitivity and specificity with CMAP compensation were 95.0% and 90.9%, respectively.

Conclusions:

Intraoperative TCMEP monitoring is a significantly reliable method for preventing postoperative motor palsy in both cranial and spinal surgery. A 70% reduction in the compensated amplitude is considered to be a suitable alarm point in all neurological operations.

Motor evoked potential mapping and monitoring by direct brainstem stimulation

✓Motor evoked potentials (MEPs) by direct brainstem stimulation were generated during 12 neurosurgical operations performed in five posterior fossa tumors, six vertebrobasilar aneurysms, and an arachnoid cyst. The anterior aspect of the brainstem was exposed using a subtemporal approach (in six cases), a presigmoid approach (one case), or a lateral suboccipital approach (five cases). A train of five monopolar 5 to 25 mA pulses was then applied, and MEPs were recorded from the extremities. Motor evoked potentials were recorded in all patients (four mappings and seven monitorings) except in a 12-year-old child who underwent surgery for a posterior cerebral artery aneurysm. Although he experienced postoperative motor palsy, the aneurysm ruptured before electrodes could be placed. Two patients with postoperative motor palsy, one with a clival meningioma and one with a basilar trunk aneurysm, had shown significant decreases in MEP amplitude and even complete disappearance of MEPs during intraoperative brainstem stimulation. Motor evoked potentials elicited by direct brainstem stimulation seem to be an accurate neurophysiological monitoring method during operations around the anterior and lateral aspects of the brainstem.

Intraoperative Motor Evoked Potential Monitoring: Overview and Update

Amidst controversy about methodology and safety, intraoperative neurophysiology has entered a new era of increasingly routine transcranial and direct electrical brain stimulation for motor evoked potential (MEP) monitoring. Based on literature review and illustrative clinical experience, this tutorial aims to present a balanced overview for experienced practitioners, surgeons and anesthesiologists as well as those new to the field. It details the physiologic basis, indications and methodology of current MEP monitoring techniques, evaluates their safety, explores interpretive controversies and outlines some applications and results, including aortic aneurysm, intramedullary spinal cord tumor, spinal deformity, posterior fossa tumor, intracranial aneurysm and peri-rolandic brain surgeries. The many advances in motor system assessment achieved in the last two decades undoubtedly improve monitoring efficacy without unduly compromising safety. Future studies and experience will likely clarify existing controversies and bring further advances.