Computed tomographic angiography as a useful adjunct in the diagnosis of brain death:

Computed tomography angiography accuracy in brain death diagnosis

OBJECTIVE

The present study was designed to answer several concerns disclosed by systematic reviews indicating no evidence to support the use of computed tomography angiography (CTA) in the diagnosis of brain death (BD). Therefore, the aim of this study was to assess the effectiveness of CTA for the diagnosis of BD and to define the optimal tomographic criteria of intracranial circulatory arrest.

METHODS

A unicenter, prospective, observational case-control study was undertaken. Comatose patients (Glasgow Coma Scale score ≤ 5), even those presenting with the first signs of BD, were included. CTA scanning of arterial and venous vasculature and transcranial Doppler (TCD) were performed. A neurological determination of BD and consequently determination of case (BD group) or control (no-BD group) was conducted. All personnel involved with assessing patients were blinded to further tests results. Accuracy of BD diagnosis determined by using CTA was calculated based on the criteria of bilateral absence of visualization of the internal cerebral veins and the distal middle cerebral arteries, the 4-point score (4PS), and an exclusive criterion of absence of deep brain venous drainage as indicated by the absence of deep venous opacification on CTA, the venous score (VS), which considers only the internal cerebral veins bilaterally.

RESULTS

A total of 106 patients were enrolled in this study; 52 patients did not have BD, and none of these patients had circulatory arrest observed by CTA or TCD (100% specificity). Of the 54 patients with a clinical diagnosis of BD, 33 met the 4PS (61.1% sensitivity), whereas 47 met the VS (87% sensitivity). The accuracy of CTA was time related, with greater accuracy when scanning was performed less than 12 hours prior to the neurological assessment, reaching 95.5% sensitivity with the VS.

CONCLUSIONS

CTA can reliably support a diagnosis of BD. The criterion of the absence of deep venous opacification, which can be assessed by use of the VS criteria investigated in this study, can confirm the occurrence of cerebral circulatory arrest.Clinical trial registration no.: 12500913400000068 (clinicaltrials.gov).

Impact of decompressive craniectomy on brain perfusion scintigraphy as an ancillary test for brain death diagnosis

OBJECTIVES

Decompressive craniectomy is occasionally performed for patients with impending brain death, which is intended to relieve critically elevated intracranial pressure to keep effective intracranial perfusion. It has been in debate if this surgery later affects the result of brain perfusion scintigraphy performed as an ancillary test in the course of brain death diagnosis because rigid closed skull is deemed essential to elevate intracranial pressure to the point of total absence of intracranial radiotracer uptake on scintigraphy. The purpose of this study is to elucidate the impact of decompressive craniectomy on the result of brain perfusion scintigraphy in patients with suspected brain death.

METHODS

This retrospective cross-sectional study included consecutive 151 brain perfusion scintigraphy performed in 138 patients with suspected brain death from various causes (male 82 patients, female 56 patients; range 0-74 years; mean age 36.6 years). All exams were indicated due to inconclusive clinical diagnosis of brain death. The scintigraphy protocol consists of immediate flow phase and delayed parenchymal phase planar imaging. Additional SPECT imaging was performed in 15 studies in 14 patients. The results, positive or negative brain flow, were compared between patients with and without decompressive craniectomy using Chi-squared test. As there were patients with repeat studies, analysis was performed for both initial and final exam results. Same dataset was used for initial and final exams in patients with only one exam.

RESULTS

Out of 138 patients, 15 patients underwent decompressive craniectomy (11%) and 123 patients were managed medically (89%). On the initial exam, negative brain flow was demonstrated in 11 of 15 patients with craniectomy (73.3%) and 106 of 123 patients without craniectomy (86.2%). On the final exam, negative brain flow was demonstrated 12 of 15 patients with craniectomy (80%) and 111 of 123 patients without craniectomy (90.2%). There were no statistically significant differences between the two groups on both initial and final exams (p = 0.19 and 0.23, respectively).

CONCLUSION

In patients with suspected brain death, history of decompressive craniectomy does not affect the result of brain perfusion scintigraphy.

Computed tomography angiography as a confirmatory test for the diagnosis of brain death

OBJECTIVE

For a diagnosis of brain death (BD), ancillary testing is performed if patient factors prohibit a complete clinical examination and apnea test. The American Academy of Neurology (AAN) guidelines identify cerebral angiography (CA), cerebral scintigraphy, electroencephalography, and transcranial Doppler ultrasonography as accepted ancillary tests. CA is widely considered the gold standard of these, as it provides the most reliable assessment of intracranial blood flow. CT angiography (CTA) is a noninvasive and widely available study that is also capable of identifying absent or severely diminished intracranial blood flow, but it is not included among the AAN's accepted ancillary tests because of insufficient evidence demonstrating its reliability. The objective of this study was to assess the statistical performance of CTA in diagnosing BD, using clinical criteria alone or clinical criteria plus CA as the gold-standard comparisons.

METHODS

The authors prospectively enrolled 22 adult patients undergoing workup for BD. All patients had cranial imaging and clinical examination results consistent with BD. In patients who met the AAN clinical criteria for BD, the authors performed CA and CTA so that both tests could be compared with the gold-standard clinical criteria. In cases that required ancillary testing, CA was performed as a confirmatory study, and CTA was then performed to compare against clinical criteria plus CA. Radiographic data were evaluated by an independent neuroradiologist. Test characteristics for CTA were calculated.

RESULTS

Four patients could not complete the standard BD workup and were excluded from analysis. Of the remaining 18 patients, 16 met AAN criteria for BD, 9 of whom required ancillary testing with CA. Of the 16 patients, 2 who also required CA ancillary testing were found to have persistent intracranial flow and were not declared brain dead at that time. These patients also underwent CTA; the results were concordant with the CA results. Six patients who were diagnosed with BD on the basis of clinical criteria alone also underwent CA, with 100% sensitivity. For all 18 patients included in the study, CTA had a sensitivity of 75%, a specificity of 100%, a positive predictive value of 100%, and a negative predictive value of 33%.

CONCLUSIONS

Clinical examination with or without CA remains the gold standard in BD testing. Studies assessing the statistical performance of CTA in BD testing should compare CTA to these gold standards. The statistical performance of CTA in BD testing is comparable to several of the nationally accepted ancillary tests. These data add to the growing medical literature supporting the use of CTA as a reliable ancillary test in BD testing.