1
|
Tran RMN, Malik S, Reist C, Oh CK, Abdul-Musawir N, Tjen-A-Looi SC, Fu LW, Baird TJ, Nguyen AT, Gong YD, Guo ZL. Stellate ganglion blockade under ultrasound-guidance and the physiological responses in the rat. Front Physiol 2025; 15:1505038. [PMID: 39867227 PMCID: PMC11757301 DOI: 10.3389/fphys.2024.1505038] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/02/2024] [Accepted: 12/24/2024] [Indexed: 01/28/2025] Open
Abstract
Stellate ganglion blockade (SGB) is a practical approach to managing many clinical disorders. Ultrasound-guided SGB is currently adopted as a more effective and safer method in humans. Developing this technique in rats would facilitate further study of SGB application. The present study examined physiological responses following ultrasound-guided SGB in Sprague-Dawley rats. Under general anesthesia, lidocaine containing Chicago blue dye (1.0%-1.5% in 40-60 µL) was injected into the unilateral stellate ganglion (SG). Ptosis was observed on the ipsilateral right (n = 8) or left (n = 7) side of lidocaine administration. No ptosis was noted in any controls by 0.9% normal saline injection into the right (n = 6) or left (n = 6) SG. Heart rate (HR) was significantly decreased after administration of lidocaine (344 ± 32 to 289 ± 47 bpm; p = 0.015, pre-vs. after-injection), but not after normal saline, into the right SG. HR was unaltered after injecting lidocaine or normal saline into the left SG. Heart rate variability analysis showed that SGB with lidocaine on the right or left side caused a decrease in the ratio of the power of low-frequency over high-frequency. Respiratory rate, body temperature, and general conditions were unchanged in all rats, regardless of left or right SGB. Chicago blue dye was confirmed to be distributed in the SG region. No bleeding or tissue damage was evident in the injected SG area. Our findings suggest that ultrasound-guided unilateral SGB effectively inhibits cervicothoracic sympathetic nerves in rats and enhances heart rate variability, and sympathetic nerves controlling HR are likely predominantly associated with the right SG in the rat.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robert M. N. Tran
- Susan Samueli Integrative Health Institute and Department of Medicine, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, CA, United States
| | - Shaista Malik
- Susan Samueli Integrative Health Institute and Department of Medicine, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, CA, United States
| | - Christopher Reist
- AEON Biopharma, Inc., Irvine, CA, United States
- Department of Psychiatry, School of Medicine, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, CA, United States
| | - Chad K. Oh
- AEON Biopharma, Inc., Irvine, CA, United States
| | | | - Stephanie C. Tjen-A-Looi
- Susan Samueli Integrative Health Institute and Department of Medicine, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, CA, United States
| | - Liang-Wu Fu
- Susan Samueli Integrative Health Institute and Department of Medicine, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, CA, United States
| | | | - Anh T. Nguyen
- Susan Samueli Integrative Health Institute and Department of Medicine, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, CA, United States
| | - Yiwei D. Gong
- Susan Samueli Integrative Health Institute and Department of Medicine, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, CA, United States
| | - Zhi-Ling Guo
- Susan Samueli Integrative Health Institute and Department of Medicine, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, CA, United States
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Sippel LM, Hamblen JL, Kelmendi B, Alpert JE, Carpenter LL, Grzenda A, Kraguljac N, McDonald WM, Rodriguez CI, Widge AS, Nemeroff CB, Schnurr PP, Holtzheimer PE. Novel Pharmacologic and Other Somatic Treatment Approaches for Posttraumatic Stress Disorder in Adults: State of the Evidence. Am J Psychiatry 2024; 181:1045-1058. [PMID: 39616450 DOI: 10.1176/appi.ajp.20230950] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/18/2024]
Abstract
Posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) is a highly prevalent psychiatric disorder that can become chronic and debilitating when left untreated. The most commonly recommended first-line treatments for PTSD among adults are individual trauma-focused psychotherapies. Other evidence-based treatments include specific antidepressant medications and non-trauma-focused psychotherapies. Despite the effectiveness of these available treatments, many patients' symptoms do not remit. This has led to the search for novel treatments for PTSD. In this review, the authors critically evaluate the data supporting several emerging pharmacological and other somatic interventions in the categories of medication-assisted psychotherapy, novel medication monotherapy strategies, and neuromodulation, selected because of the salience of their mechanisms of action to the pathophysiology of PTSD (e.g., MDMA-assisted psychotherapy, ketamine, cannabidiol, transcranial magnetic stimulation). The authors also evaluate the evidence for treatments that are the focus of increasing scientific or public interest (i.e., hyperbaric oxygen therapy, stellate ganglion block, neurofeedback). To date, the evidence supporting most novel pharmacological and somatic treatments for PTSD is preliminary and highly variable; however, the data for several specific treatments, such as transcranial magnetic stimulation, are encouraging.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lauren M Sippel
- National Center for PTSD, U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, Washington, DC (Sippel, Hamblen, Kelmendi, Schnurr, Holtzheimer); Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Department of Psychiatry, Hanover, NH (Sippel, Hamblen, Schnurr, Holtzheimer); Northeast Program Evaluation Center, U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, (Sippel); Department of Psychiatry, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT (Kelmendi); Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, New York, NY (Alpert); Department of Psychiatry and Human Behavior, Butler Hospital, Brown University, Providence, RI (Carpenter); Department of Psychiatry, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles (Grzenda); Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Health, The Ohio State University, Columbus (Kraguljac); Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA (McDonald); Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University, Stanford, and Veterans Affairs Palo Alto Health Care System, Palo Alto, CA (Rodriguez); Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis (Widge); Dell Medical School, University of Texas at Austin, Austin (Nemeroff)
| | - Jessica L Hamblen
- National Center for PTSD, U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, Washington, DC (Sippel, Hamblen, Kelmendi, Schnurr, Holtzheimer); Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Department of Psychiatry, Hanover, NH (Sippel, Hamblen, Schnurr, Holtzheimer); Northeast Program Evaluation Center, U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, (Sippel); Department of Psychiatry, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT (Kelmendi); Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, New York, NY (Alpert); Department of Psychiatry and Human Behavior, Butler Hospital, Brown University, Providence, RI (Carpenter); Department of Psychiatry, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles (Grzenda); Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Health, The Ohio State University, Columbus (Kraguljac); Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA (McDonald); Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University, Stanford, and Veterans Affairs Palo Alto Health Care System, Palo Alto, CA (Rodriguez); Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis (Widge); Dell Medical School, University of Texas at Austin, Austin (Nemeroff)
| | - Benjamin Kelmendi
- National Center for PTSD, U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, Washington, DC (Sippel, Hamblen, Kelmendi, Schnurr, Holtzheimer); Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Department of Psychiatry, Hanover, NH (Sippel, Hamblen, Schnurr, Holtzheimer); Northeast Program Evaluation Center, U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, (Sippel); Department of Psychiatry, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT (Kelmendi); Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, New York, NY (Alpert); Department of Psychiatry and Human Behavior, Butler Hospital, Brown University, Providence, RI (Carpenter); Department of Psychiatry, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles (Grzenda); Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Health, The Ohio State University, Columbus (Kraguljac); Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA (McDonald); Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University, Stanford, and Veterans Affairs Palo Alto Health Care System, Palo Alto, CA (Rodriguez); Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis (Widge); Dell Medical School, University of Texas at Austin, Austin (Nemeroff)
| | - Jonathan E Alpert
- National Center for PTSD, U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, Washington, DC (Sippel, Hamblen, Kelmendi, Schnurr, Holtzheimer); Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Department of Psychiatry, Hanover, NH (Sippel, Hamblen, Schnurr, Holtzheimer); Northeast Program Evaluation Center, U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, (Sippel); Department of Psychiatry, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT (Kelmendi); Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, New York, NY (Alpert); Department of Psychiatry and Human Behavior, Butler Hospital, Brown University, Providence, RI (Carpenter); Department of Psychiatry, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles (Grzenda); Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Health, The Ohio State University, Columbus (Kraguljac); Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA (McDonald); Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University, Stanford, and Veterans Affairs Palo Alto Health Care System, Palo Alto, CA (Rodriguez); Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis (Widge); Dell Medical School, University of Texas at Austin, Austin (Nemeroff)
| | - Linda L Carpenter
- National Center for PTSD, U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, Washington, DC (Sippel, Hamblen, Kelmendi, Schnurr, Holtzheimer); Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Department of Psychiatry, Hanover, NH (Sippel, Hamblen, Schnurr, Holtzheimer); Northeast Program Evaluation Center, U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, (Sippel); Department of Psychiatry, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT (Kelmendi); Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, New York, NY (Alpert); Department of Psychiatry and Human Behavior, Butler Hospital, Brown University, Providence, RI (Carpenter); Department of Psychiatry, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles (Grzenda); Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Health, The Ohio State University, Columbus (Kraguljac); Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA (McDonald); Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University, Stanford, and Veterans Affairs Palo Alto Health Care System, Palo Alto, CA (Rodriguez); Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis (Widge); Dell Medical School, University of Texas at Austin, Austin (Nemeroff)
| | - Adrienne Grzenda
- National Center for PTSD, U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, Washington, DC (Sippel, Hamblen, Kelmendi, Schnurr, Holtzheimer); Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Department of Psychiatry, Hanover, NH (Sippel, Hamblen, Schnurr, Holtzheimer); Northeast Program Evaluation Center, U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, (Sippel); Department of Psychiatry, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT (Kelmendi); Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, New York, NY (Alpert); Department of Psychiatry and Human Behavior, Butler Hospital, Brown University, Providence, RI (Carpenter); Department of Psychiatry, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles (Grzenda); Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Health, The Ohio State University, Columbus (Kraguljac); Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA (McDonald); Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University, Stanford, and Veterans Affairs Palo Alto Health Care System, Palo Alto, CA (Rodriguez); Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis (Widge); Dell Medical School, University of Texas at Austin, Austin (Nemeroff)
| | - Nina Kraguljac
- National Center for PTSD, U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, Washington, DC (Sippel, Hamblen, Kelmendi, Schnurr, Holtzheimer); Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Department of Psychiatry, Hanover, NH (Sippel, Hamblen, Schnurr, Holtzheimer); Northeast Program Evaluation Center, U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, (Sippel); Department of Psychiatry, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT (Kelmendi); Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, New York, NY (Alpert); Department of Psychiatry and Human Behavior, Butler Hospital, Brown University, Providence, RI (Carpenter); Department of Psychiatry, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles (Grzenda); Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Health, The Ohio State University, Columbus (Kraguljac); Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA (McDonald); Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University, Stanford, and Veterans Affairs Palo Alto Health Care System, Palo Alto, CA (Rodriguez); Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis (Widge); Dell Medical School, University of Texas at Austin, Austin (Nemeroff)
| | - William M McDonald
- National Center for PTSD, U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, Washington, DC (Sippel, Hamblen, Kelmendi, Schnurr, Holtzheimer); Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Department of Psychiatry, Hanover, NH (Sippel, Hamblen, Schnurr, Holtzheimer); Northeast Program Evaluation Center, U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, (Sippel); Department of Psychiatry, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT (Kelmendi); Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, New York, NY (Alpert); Department of Psychiatry and Human Behavior, Butler Hospital, Brown University, Providence, RI (Carpenter); Department of Psychiatry, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles (Grzenda); Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Health, The Ohio State University, Columbus (Kraguljac); Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA (McDonald); Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University, Stanford, and Veterans Affairs Palo Alto Health Care System, Palo Alto, CA (Rodriguez); Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis (Widge); Dell Medical School, University of Texas at Austin, Austin (Nemeroff)
| | - Carolyn I Rodriguez
- National Center for PTSD, U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, Washington, DC (Sippel, Hamblen, Kelmendi, Schnurr, Holtzheimer); Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Department of Psychiatry, Hanover, NH (Sippel, Hamblen, Schnurr, Holtzheimer); Northeast Program Evaluation Center, U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, (Sippel); Department of Psychiatry, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT (Kelmendi); Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, New York, NY (Alpert); Department of Psychiatry and Human Behavior, Butler Hospital, Brown University, Providence, RI (Carpenter); Department of Psychiatry, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles (Grzenda); Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Health, The Ohio State University, Columbus (Kraguljac); Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA (McDonald); Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University, Stanford, and Veterans Affairs Palo Alto Health Care System, Palo Alto, CA (Rodriguez); Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis (Widge); Dell Medical School, University of Texas at Austin, Austin (Nemeroff)
| | - Alik S Widge
- National Center for PTSD, U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, Washington, DC (Sippel, Hamblen, Kelmendi, Schnurr, Holtzheimer); Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Department of Psychiatry, Hanover, NH (Sippel, Hamblen, Schnurr, Holtzheimer); Northeast Program Evaluation Center, U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, (Sippel); Department of Psychiatry, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT (Kelmendi); Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, New York, NY (Alpert); Department of Psychiatry and Human Behavior, Butler Hospital, Brown University, Providence, RI (Carpenter); Department of Psychiatry, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles (Grzenda); Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Health, The Ohio State University, Columbus (Kraguljac); Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA (McDonald); Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University, Stanford, and Veterans Affairs Palo Alto Health Care System, Palo Alto, CA (Rodriguez); Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis (Widge); Dell Medical School, University of Texas at Austin, Austin (Nemeroff)
| | - Charles B Nemeroff
- National Center for PTSD, U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, Washington, DC (Sippel, Hamblen, Kelmendi, Schnurr, Holtzheimer); Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Department of Psychiatry, Hanover, NH (Sippel, Hamblen, Schnurr, Holtzheimer); Northeast Program Evaluation Center, U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, (Sippel); Department of Psychiatry, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT (Kelmendi); Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, New York, NY (Alpert); Department of Psychiatry and Human Behavior, Butler Hospital, Brown University, Providence, RI (Carpenter); Department of Psychiatry, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles (Grzenda); Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Health, The Ohio State University, Columbus (Kraguljac); Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA (McDonald); Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University, Stanford, and Veterans Affairs Palo Alto Health Care System, Palo Alto, CA (Rodriguez); Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis (Widge); Dell Medical School, University of Texas at Austin, Austin (Nemeroff)
| | - Paula P Schnurr
- National Center for PTSD, U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, Washington, DC (Sippel, Hamblen, Kelmendi, Schnurr, Holtzheimer); Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Department of Psychiatry, Hanover, NH (Sippel, Hamblen, Schnurr, Holtzheimer); Northeast Program Evaluation Center, U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, (Sippel); Department of Psychiatry, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT (Kelmendi); Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, New York, NY (Alpert); Department of Psychiatry and Human Behavior, Butler Hospital, Brown University, Providence, RI (Carpenter); Department of Psychiatry, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles (Grzenda); Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Health, The Ohio State University, Columbus (Kraguljac); Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA (McDonald); Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University, Stanford, and Veterans Affairs Palo Alto Health Care System, Palo Alto, CA (Rodriguez); Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis (Widge); Dell Medical School, University of Texas at Austin, Austin (Nemeroff)
| | - Paul E Holtzheimer
- National Center for PTSD, U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, Washington, DC (Sippel, Hamblen, Kelmendi, Schnurr, Holtzheimer); Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Department of Psychiatry, Hanover, NH (Sippel, Hamblen, Schnurr, Holtzheimer); Northeast Program Evaluation Center, U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, (Sippel); Department of Psychiatry, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT (Kelmendi); Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, New York, NY (Alpert); Department of Psychiatry and Human Behavior, Butler Hospital, Brown University, Providence, RI (Carpenter); Department of Psychiatry, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles (Grzenda); Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Health, The Ohio State University, Columbus (Kraguljac); Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA (McDonald); Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University, Stanford, and Veterans Affairs Palo Alto Health Care System, Palo Alto, CA (Rodriguez); Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis (Widge); Dell Medical School, University of Texas at Austin, Austin (Nemeroff)
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Hughey S, Cole J, Drew B, Brust A, Stedjelarsen E. Regional anesthesia in resource-limited and disaster environments: a daring discourse. Reg Anesth Pain Med 2024:rapm-2024-105680. [PMID: 38942425 DOI: 10.1136/rapm-2024-105680] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/16/2024] [Accepted: 06/12/2024] [Indexed: 06/30/2024]
Abstract
Regional anesthesia (RA) is commonly used in perioperative settings of developed and well-resourced environments. RA has significant potential benefits when used in resource-limited environments, including disaster, mass casualty, and wartime environments. RA offers benefits over general anesthesia and opioid-based analgesia, including decreased risk of complications, decreased reliance on mechanical ventilation, improved cost efficiency, and others. The decreasing cost of ultrasound matched with its smaller size and portability increases the availability of ultrasound in these environments, making ultrasound-guided RA more feasible. This daring discourse discusses some historical examples of RA in ultralow resource environments, both man-made disasters and natural disasters. Future investigations should increase the usefulness and availability of RA in resource-limited environments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Scott Hughey
- Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, US Naval Hospital Okinawa, Okinawa, Japan
- Naval Biotechnology Group, Portsmouth, Virginia, USA
| | - Jacob Cole
- Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Naval Medical Center Portsmouth, Portsmouth, Virginia, USA
- Naval Biotechnology Group, Portsmouth, Virginia, USA
| | - Benjamin Drew
- Naval Medical Center San Diego, San Diego, California, USA
- Naval Biotechnology Group, Portsmouth, Virginia, USA
| | - Adam Brust
- Anesthesiology, US Naval Hospital Pensacola, Pensacola, Florida, USA
- Naval Biotechnology Group, Portsmouth, Virginia, USA
| | - Eric Stedjelarsen
- Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Naval Medical Center Portsmouth, Portsmouth, Virginia, USA
- Naval Biotechnology Group, Portsmouth, Virginia, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Blakey SM, Rae Olmsted KL, Hirsch S, Asman K, Wallace D, Olmsted MG, Vandermaas-Peeler R, Karg RS, Walters BB. Differential posttraumatic stress disorder symptom cluster response to stellate ganglion block: secondary analysis of a randomized controlled trial. Transl Psychiatry 2024; 14:223. [PMID: 38811568 PMCID: PMC11137131 DOI: 10.1038/s41398-024-02926-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/26/2023] [Revised: 05/09/2024] [Accepted: 05/13/2024] [Indexed: 05/31/2024] Open
Abstract
Empirically supported treatments for posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) exist, but research suggests these therapies are less effective, acceptable, and feasible to deliver to active duty service members (SMs) compared to civilians. Stellate ganglion block (SGB) procedure, in which a local anesthetic is injected around the cervical sympathetic chain or stellate ganglion to temporarily inhibit sympathetic nervous activity, is gaining popularity as an alternative PTSD treatment in military settings. However, it is unknown whether certain PTSD symptoms are more responsive to SGB than others. The current study involved a secondary analysis of data collected from a previous randomized controlled trial of SGB compared to sham (normal saline) injection (N = 113 SMs). PTSD symptoms were assessed via clinical interview and self-report at baseline and 8 weeks post-SGB or sham. Logistic regression analyses showed that the marked alterations in arousal and reactivity PTSD symptom cluster demonstrated the greatest symptom severity reductions after SGB, relative to sham. The reexperiencing cluster also showed pronounced response to SGB in clinician-rated but not self-reported outcomes. Post-hoc item-level analyses suggested that arousal and reactivity cluster findings were driven by reductions in hypervigilance, concentration difficulties, and sleep disturbance, whereas clinician-rated reexperiencing cluster findings were driven by reductions in physiological reactions to trauma cues, emotional reactions to trauma cues, and intrusions. Our findings align with a burgeoning literature positioning SGB as a potential novel or adjunctive PTSD treatment. Results could guide future hypothesis-driven research on mediators of therapeutic change during SGB for PTSD symptoms in SMs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Shawn Hirsch
- RTI International, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA
| | - Kat Asman
- RTI International, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Lu DH, Xu XX, Zhou R, Wang C, Lan LT, Yang XY, Feng X. Ultrasound-guided stellate ganglion block benefits the postoperative recovery of patients undergoing laparoscopic colorectal surgery: a single-center, double-blinded, randomized controlled clinical trial. BMC Anesthesiol 2024; 24:137. [PMID: 38600490 PMCID: PMC11005129 DOI: 10.1186/s12871-024-02518-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/19/2023] [Accepted: 03/28/2024] [Indexed: 04/12/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND With the increasing prevalence of colorectal cancer (CRC), optimizing perioperative management is of paramount importance. This study investigates the potential of stellate ganglion block (SGB), known for its stress response-mediating effects, in improving postoperative recovery. We postulate that preoperative SGB may enhance the postoperative recovery of patients undergoing laparoscopic CRC surgery. METHODS We conducted a randomized controlled trial of 57 patients undergoing laparoscopic colorectal cancer surgery at a single center. Patients, aged 18-70 years, were randomly assigned to receive either preoperative SGB or standard care. SGB group patients received 10 mL of 0.2% ropivacaine under ultrasound guidance prior to surgery. Primary outcome was time to flatus, with secondary outcomes encompassing time to defecation, lying in bed time, visual analog scale (VAS) pain score, hospital stays, patient costs, intraoperative and postoperative complications, and 3-year mortality. A per-protocol analysis was used. RESULTS Twenty-nine patients in the SGB group and 28 patients in the control group were analyzed. The SGB group exhibited a significantly shorter time to flatus (mean [SD] hour, 20.52 [9.18] vs. 27.93 [11.69]; p = 0.012), accompanied by decreased plasma cortisol levels (mean [SD], postoperatively, 4.01 [3.42] vs 7.75 [3.13], p = 0.02). Notably, postoperative pain was effectively managed, evident by lower VAS scores at 6 h post-surgery in SGB-treated patients (mean [SD], 4.70 [0.91] vs 5.35 [1.32]; p = 0.040). Furthermore, patients in the SGB group experienced reduced hospital stay length (mean [SD], day, 6.61 [1.57] vs 8.72 [5.13], p = 0.042). CONCLUSIONS Preoperative SGB emerges as a promising approach to enhance the postoperative recovery of patients undergoing laparoscopic CRC surgery. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION ChiCTR1900028404, Principal investigator: Xia Feng, Date of registration: 12/20/2019.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Di-Han Lu
- Department of Anesthesiology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, No.58 2nd Zhongshan Road, Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510080, P.R. China
| | - Xuan-Xian Xu
- Department of Anesthesiology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, No.58 2nd Zhongshan Road, Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510080, P.R. China
| | - Rui Zhou
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The Sun Yat-Sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, No. 107 Yanjiang West Road, Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510120, P.R. China
| | - Chen Wang
- Department of Anesthesiology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, No.58 2nd Zhongshan Road, Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510080, P.R. China
| | - Liang-Tian Lan
- Department of Anesthesiology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, No.58 2nd Zhongshan Road, Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510080, P.R. China
| | - Xiao-Yu Yang
- Department of Anesthesiology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, No.58 2nd Zhongshan Road, Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510080, P.R. China.
| | - Xia Feng
- Department of Anesthesiology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, No.58 2nd Zhongshan Road, Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510080, P.R. China.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Oliveira LDB, Batista S, Prestes MZ, Bocanegra-Becerra JE, Rabelo NN, Bertani R, Welling LC, Figueiredo EG. Stellate Ganglion Block in Subarachnoid Hemorrhage: A Promising Protective Measure Against Vasospasm? World Neurosurg 2024; 182:124-131. [PMID: 38042290 DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2023.11.122] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/22/2023] [Revised: 11/23/2023] [Accepted: 11/24/2023] [Indexed: 12/04/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Stellate ganglion block (SGB) may have protective effects in patients at risk of vasospasm following subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) due to reduced sympathetic activity. However, the safety and clinical outcomes of SGB in this scenario are not definitively known. The objective was to evaluate the safety, clinical outcomes, and cerebral blood flow velocity in patients submitted to SGB or cervical sympathectomy with SAH. METHODS Following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis guidelines, a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies investigating SGB or cervical sympathectomy use in SAH were conducted. PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Embase were evaluated. Patients with mRS from 0 to 2, GOS from 4 to 5, or symptom resolution were considered favorable clinical outcomes. Related mortality was defined as death by vasospasm or delayed cerebral ischemia. RESULTS The analysis included 8 studies comprising 182 patients. Only 2 studies employed SGB prophylactically. The results revealed favorable outcomes in 52% of patients (95% CI: 37%-65%). The overall incidence of complications was 2% (95% CI: 0% -26%). The mortality rate was 13% (95% CI: 7%-21%), with a vasospasm-related mortality rate of 11% (95% CI: 2%-20%). A decrease of cerebral blood flow velocity was reported in 4 studies. CONCLUSIONS The notable reduction in cerebral blood flow velocity following SGB, alongside positive outcomes and a low occurrence of mortality and complications, highlights its significance as a therapeutic intervention for vasospasm following SAH. While the number of studies evaluating SGB as a preventive measure is limited, the promising results emphasize the importance of future research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Sávio Batista
- Faculty of Medicine, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
| | | | | | | | - Raphael Bertani
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Mo K, Qian L, Tian J, Liao J, Tan F, Kong W, Yu X, Chi X. Ultrasound-guided stellate ganglion blockade - patient positioning is everything: a case report demonstrating the efficacy of a modified out-of-plane approach. Front Neurosci 2024; 17:1288484. [PMID: 38292894 PMCID: PMC10825014 DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2023.1288484] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/04/2023] [Accepted: 12/30/2023] [Indexed: 02/01/2024] Open
Abstract
Background Insomnia has become increasingly prevalent in modern society and is notoriously difficult to treat. Many patients exhibit a poor response to pharmacological interventions. Stellate ganglion block (SGB) has emerged as an effective method for managing insomnia; however, its efficacy may be compromised in some patients, primarily due to a variant vertebral artery anatomy. Case presentation This case report describes a patient with severe insomnia accompanied by anxiety. Through cervical ultrasound scanning, we identified richly branched cervical arteries at the C6-C7 segment of the vertebral artery, along with anatomical variations, which could pose a heightened risk for the traditional SGB procedure. Therefore, after carefully adjusting the patient's positioning, we proceeded with ultrasound-guided SGB using a lateral paravein out-of-plane approach. Clinical signs of successful insomnia symptoms alleviation were consistently observed after each block utilizing this alternative technique multiple times in a single patient. Conclusion Our report reveals a new lateral paravein out-of-plane approach for ultrasound-guided SGB to treat insomnia, which might be considered an alternative method. More studies should be carried out to confirm the efficacy of this new approach.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Xinjin Chi
- Department of Anesthesiology, The Seventh Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Shenzhen, Guangdong, China
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Springer S, Whitmer P, Steinlin M, Gray L, Blankfield J. Optimizing clinical outcomes with stellate ganglion block and trauma-informed care: A review article. NeuroRehabilitation 2024; 55:385-396. [PMID: 38995805 PMCID: PMC11613001 DOI: 10.3233/nre-230236] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/30/2023] [Accepted: 05/16/2024] [Indexed: 07/14/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND For decades, thousands of active-duty service members have sought treatment for trauma exposure. Stellate ganglion block (SGB) is a fast-acting nerve block documented in medical literature for nearly a century that has shown promise as a potentially life-altering treatment for post-traumatic stress (PTS). OBJECTIVE This review aims to answer the practical questions of those who support individuals suffering from trauma: (1) SGB's safety profile (2) efficacy data (3) potential advantages and limitations, (4) a cross-cultural application example, (5) and the use of SGB in combination with talk therapy to optimize clinical outcomes. METHODS The current body of literature, to include several large case series, meta-analyses, and a sufficiently powered randomized controlled trial, were reviewed, and presented to describe the history of SGB for emotional trauma symptoms and address the objectives of this review. RESULTS Critical consideration is given to the safety and efficacy data on SGB and the evolution in safety-related technologies. Advantages such as decreased barriers to care, rapid onset, and decreased dropout and limitations such as treatment non-response, potential adverse effects, and misconceptions about the treatment are then described. Finally, the cross-cultural application of SGB is explored based on the deployment of SGB in Israel. CONCLUSION SGB is associated with level 1B evidence and a reassuring safety profile. Evolving the model of care through the combined use of effective biological treatments like SGB with trauma informed talk therapy offers a hopeful path forward for supporting those who suffer from post-traumatic stress.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Paul Whitmer
- School of Social Work, Illinois State University, Normal, IL, USA
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
Prasad S, Jain N, Umar TP, Radenkov I, Ahmed SK, Sakagianni V, Kollia S, Hingora MJ, Kumari N, Akbari AR, Renemane L, Bachu A. Sympathetic nerve blocks for posttraumatic stress disorder: an evidentiary review for future clinical trials. Front Psychiatry 2023; 14:1309986. [PMID: 38188052 PMCID: PMC10771322 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1309986] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/09/2023] [Accepted: 11/30/2023] [Indexed: 01/09/2024] Open
Abstract
Posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) is a chronic disorder resulting from exposure to traumatic events. In recent years, sympathetic nerve blocks have gained interest as an emerging treatment modality for PTSD. They have been shown to reduce autonomic dysfunction associated with PTSD symptoms, particularly in refractory and treatment-resistant patients. However, there is limited evidence regarding the technique's effectiveness in PTSD patients. Therefore, this scoping review was designed to update and summarize the current literature on this topic to inform the design of future clinical trials and studies. Our review of 22 studies (mostly case reports and series) included 1,293 PTSD patients who received sympathetic nerve blocks, primarily military service members and veterans, with a median age of 42.2 years. 0.5% Ropivacaine was the preferred anesthetic, and the right sided stellate ganglion block was the most commonly used technique. Relapse of symptoms was reported commonly, resulting in additional nerve block sessions. Most reported side effects were mild and transient. Despite the encouraging results, we remain cautious in interpreting the benefit of the technique due to the lack of sufficient standardized clinical trial data, heterogeneity in reported results, and the potential for bias in reporting. Future studies should focus on evaluating and addressing the technique's effectiveness, safety, tolerability, and indications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sakshi Prasad
- Faculty of Medicine, National Pirogov Memorial Medical University, Vinnytsia, Ukraine
| | - Nityanand Jain
- Faculty of Medicine, Riga Stradinš University, Riga, Latvia
| | - Tungki Pratama Umar
- UCL Centre for Nanotechnology and Regenerative Medicine, Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, University College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Igor Radenkov
- Faculty of Medicine, St. Cyril and Methodius University, Skopje, North Macedonia
| | - Sirwan Khalid Ahmed
- Department of Adult Nursing, College of Nursing, University of Raparin, Rania, Sulaymaniyah, Kurdistan, Iraq
| | - Virginia Sakagianni
- School of Medicine, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece
| | - Sofia Kollia
- School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | | | - Nikita Kumari
- Sindh Medical College (SMC), Jinnah Sindh Medical University (JSMU), Karachi, Pakistan
| | - Amir Reza Akbari
- Emergency Department, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Queen's Medical Centre, Nottingham, United Kingdom
| | - Lubova Renemane
- Department of Psychiatry and Narcology, Riga Stradinš University, Riga, Latvia
| | - Anil Bachu
- Baptist Health– UAMS Psychiatry Residency Education Program, North Little Rock, AR, United States
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Yan S, Wang Y, Yu L, Xia W, Xue F, Yu Y, Yuan B, Li N, Li H, Liang H, Ma J, Zhang Z. Stellate ganglion block alleviates postoperative sleep disturbance in patients undergoing radical surgery for gastrointestinal malignancies. J Clin Sleep Med 2023; 19:1633-1642. [PMID: 37128727 PMCID: PMC10476041 DOI: 10.5664/jcsm.10632] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/30/2022] [Revised: 04/19/2023] [Accepted: 04/20/2023] [Indexed: 05/03/2023]
Abstract
STUDY OBJECTIVES We explored the effects of stellate ganglion block on postoperative sleep disturbance in patients scheduled to undergo radical surgery for gastrointestinal malignancies. METHODS Forty such patients were randomly assigned to the control group (Group C) or the preoperative stellate ganglion block treatment group (Group S). Using actigraphy, sleep quality was evaluated on the first night before the operation and first, second, and third postoperative nights. The Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index scale was used for sleep state assessment on 1 day preoperatively and the first, second, third, fifth, and seventh days postoperatively. Plasma interleukin (IL)-1, IL-6, and IL-10 and melatonin levels were checked at 1 day preoperatively and the first and third days postoperatively. Mean arterial pressure, heart rate, and pulse oxygen saturation (SpO2) were recorded before general anesthesia induction, immediately after tracheal intubation, at the beginning of the operation, 1 and 2 hours after the beginning of the operation, at the end of the operation, immediately after extubation, and 30 minutes after transfer to the postanesthesia care unit. RESULTS Compared with Group C, in Group S sleep efficiency, total sleep time, and sleep maintenance were increased and sleep period change index, number of awakenings, wake after sleep onset, and body movements were reduced on the first and second postoperative nights; Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index scores and occurrence of postoperative sleep disturbance were lower on the first and second nights postoperatively; IL-6 was reduced on the first night postoperatively; IL-1 and IL-10 were reduced on the third night postoperatively; melatonin was increased on the first night postoperatively; and mean arterial pressure and heart rate were decreased before general anesthesia induction, immediately after tracheal intubation, and at the end of the operation (all P < .05). Conclusions: Stellate ganglion block alleviates postoperative sleep disturbance by reducing postoperative inflammatory response, increasing melatonin levels, and stabilizing perioperative hemodynamics in patients undergoing radical surgery for gastrointestinal malignancies. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION Registry: ClinicalTrials.gov; Name: The Effect of Stellate Ganglion Block on Postoperative Sleep Disturbance and Cognitive Function in Elderly Surgical Patients; URL: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04800653; Identifier: NCT04800653. CITATION Yan S, Wang Y, Yu L, et al. Stellate ganglion block alleviates postoperative sleep disturbance in patients undergoing radical surgery for gastrointestinal malignancies. J Clin Sleep Med. 2023;19(9):1633-1642.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shiting Yan
- Department of Anesthesiology, Affiliated Hospital of Yangzhou University, Yangzhou, China
- Graduate School, Dalian Medical University, Dalian, China
| | - Ying Wang
- Department of Anesthesiology, Affiliated Hospital of Yangzhou University, Yangzhou, China
- Graduate School, Dalian Medical University, Dalian, China
| | - Leyang Yu
- Department of Anesthesiology, Affiliated Hospital of Yangzhou University, Yangzhou, China
- Graduate School, Dalian Medical University, Dalian, China
| | - Wei Xia
- Department of General Surgery, Affiliated Hospital of Yangzhou University, Yangzhou, China
| | - Feng Xue
- Department of General Surgery, Affiliated Hospital of Yangzhou University, Yangzhou, China
| | - Yanlong Yu
- Department of Anesthesiology, Affiliated Hospital of Yangzhou University, Yangzhou, China
| | - Bo Yuan
- Department of Anesthesiology, Affiliated Hospital of Yangzhou University, Yangzhou, China
- Graduate School, Dalian Medical University, Dalian, China
| | - Ning Li
- Department of Anesthesiology, Affiliated Hospital of Yangzhou University, Yangzhou, China
| | - Hu Li
- Department of Anesthesiology, Affiliated Hospital of Yangzhou University, Yangzhou, China
- Graduate School, Dalian Medical University, Dalian, China
| | - Hailiang Liang
- Department of General Surgery, Affiliated Hospital of Yangzhou University, Yangzhou, China
| | - Jianming Ma
- Department of General Surgery, Affiliated Hospital of Yangzhou University, Yangzhou, China
| | - Zhuan Zhang
- Department of Anesthesiology, Affiliated Hospital of Yangzhou University, Yangzhou, China
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Feigin G, Velasco Figueroa S, Englesakis MF, D'Souza R, Hoydonckx Y, Bhatia A. Stellate ganglion block for non-pain indications: a scoping review. PAIN MEDICINE (MALDEN, MASS.) 2023; 24:775-781. [PMID: 36727500 DOI: 10.1093/pm/pnad011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/17/2022] [Revised: 01/26/2023] [Accepted: 01/31/2023] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Stellate ganglion block (SGB) is performed to relieve head, face, neck, or upper limb pain, and several non-pain indications for performing this block have emerged over the years. To date, there has been no attempt to synthesize evidence on SGB for treating non-pain indications. This scoping review presents a summary of the efficacy and adverse effects of SGB when performed for 6 non-pain indications. METHODS This scoping review was accomplished through the use of Arksey and O'Malley framework. A literature search was conducted for relevant articles in medical databases to identify publications on SGB and specified study types. Two reviewers independently assessed the risk of bias for randomized controlled trials, nonrandomized comparative studies, and case series. Results were summarized and recommendations were made on the basis of the strength of the available evidence according to the US Preventative Services Task Force grading system. RESULTS Twenty-four studies (19 randomized controlled trials and 5 nonrandomized studies) were included in this review. On the basis of the evidence, SGB is recommended for obtunding cardiovascular sympathetic stimulation, improving perfusion in limbs, and alleviating menopausal symptoms with a Grade B or C recommendation and a moderate-to-low level of certainty. There was insufficient evidence to recommend SGB for the other indications. CONCLUSIONS SGB can be considered for obtunding cardiovascular sympathetic stimulation and stress response, reducing vascular tone to improve vascular insufficiency in the limbs and perioperative hemodynamic stability, and alleviating hot flashes in menopause, in conditions refractory to conventional medical management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Guy Feigin
- Department of Anesthesia and Pain Medicine, University of Toronto, University Health Network-Toronto Western Hospital, Toronto, Ontario M5T 2S8, Canada
| | - Sofia Velasco Figueroa
- Department of Anesthesia and Pain Medicine, University of Toronto, University Health Network-Toronto Western Hospital, Toronto, Ontario M5T 2S8, Canada
| | - Marina F Englesakis
- Library & Information Services, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario M5G 2C4, Canada
| | - Rohan D'Souza
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology and Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario L8S 4L8, Canada
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Lunenfeld Tanenbaum Research Institute, Toronto, Ontario M5G 1X5, Canada
| | - Yasmine Hoydonckx
- Department of Anesthesia and Pain Medicine, University of Toronto, University Health Network-Toronto Western Hospital, Toronto, Ontario M5T 2S8, Canada
| | - Anuj Bhatia
- Department of Anesthesia and Pain Medicine, University of Toronto, University Health Network-Toronto Western Hospital, Toronto, Ontario M5T 2S8, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Bowden T, Hurt CS, Sanders J, Aitken LM. Effectiveness of cognitive interventions for adult surgical patients after general anaesthesia to improve cognitive functioning: A systematic review. J Clin Nurs 2023; 32:3117-3129. [PMID: 35733323 PMCID: PMC10946716 DOI: 10.1111/jocn.16423] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/28/2022] [Revised: 05/23/2022] [Accepted: 05/30/2022] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
AIMS AND OBJECTIVES To examine the effectiveness of cognitive interventions after general anaesthesia to improve cognitive functioning. BACKGROUND The number of surgical procedures performed worldwide is large and growing. Postoperative cognitive dysfunction is a common complication associated with poor postoperative outcomes. A variety of cognitive interventions have been developed to maintain or improve cognitive function in one or more cognitive domains. Cognitive interventions have shown to be effective in healthy older populations, those with mild cognitive impairment, and those with heart failure. The impact of cognitive interventions in surgical patients after general anaesthesia is a relatively new focus of research and is therefore less well established. METHODS Seven bibliographic databases were searched in relation to 'surgery' and 'cognitive interventions'; no date or language limits were imposed. Studies including adult patients who were scheduled for, or who had undergone surgery under general anaesthesia, had a baseline cognitive assessment using a validated measurement, and had engaged with any cognition-based intervention were included. Full-text review for inclusion, quality assessment and data extraction were undertaken independently by two authors. This study is reported in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. RESULTS A total of 550 papers were identified for possible inclusion, of which nine met the inclusion criteria and were included in the review. The majority were randomised controlled trials (RCTs) (n = 6 [66.7%]). Four studies used computerised cognitive interventions, while five used traditional cognitive interventions. Most of the studies used multi-domain cognitive training focusing on two or more domains (n = 7 [77.8%]) while two studies used single-domain cognitive training. Memory (n = 7 [77.8%]) and attention (n = 5 [55.6%]) were the cognitive domains most often targeted during the intervention. CONCLUSIONS The use of cognitive interventions demonstrated some efficacy in improving cognitive function after general anaesthesia, particularly those targeting memory. RELEVANCE FOR CLINICAL PRACTICE The findings of this review suggest that cognitive interventions show promise at improving cognitive performance in patients with POCD and could be usefully implemented in clinical practice to improve patient outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tracey Bowden
- School of Health SciencesCity, University of LondonLondonUK
| | | | - Julie Sanders
- St Bartholomew's HospitalBarts Health NHS TrustLondonUK
- The William Harvey Research InstituteQueen Mary University LondonLondonUK
| | | |
Collapse
|
13
|
Lynch JH, Mulvaney SW, Bryan CJ, Hernandez D. Stellate Ganglion Block Reduces Anxiety Symptoms by Half: A Case Series of 285 Patients. J Pers Med 2023; 13:958. [PMID: 37373947 DOI: 10.3390/jpm13060958] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/17/2023] [Revised: 06/02/2023] [Accepted: 06/04/2023] [Indexed: 06/29/2023] Open
Abstract
The stellate ganglion block (SGB) procedure has been used successfully for over twelve years to treat thousands of patients suffering from posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Level 1b evidence supports this use of SGB, but no studies to date have reported specifically on anxiety symptom improvements following SGB. We collected Generalized Anxiety Disorder questionnaire (GAD-7) scores pre-procedure and at 1-week and 1-month post-procedure from 285 patients. The mean baseline GAD-7 score of 15.9 (indicating severe anxiety) declined significantly following SGB treatment. Changes in GAD-7 scores ≥ 4 were considered clinically meaningful. From baseline to 1 week, the GAD-7 scores dropped by 9.0 points (95% CI = 8.3-9.7, p < 0.001, d = 1.8), with 211 (79.6%) patients demonstrating clinically meaningful improvement. Furthermore, from baseline to 1 month, the GAD-7 scores dropped by 8.3 points (95% CI = 7.6-9.0, p < 0.001, d = 1.7), with 200 (75.5%) patients demonstrating clinically meaningful improvement. The stellate ganglion block treatment resulted in a decrease of GAD-7 scores of over twice the minimal clinically important difference in treating anxiety for at least 1 month following SGB. Given the results from this retrospective observational study, larger prospective studies should be conducted to determine the effects of SGB treatment as a novel therapeutic treatment for generalized anxiety disorder and other anxiety disorders.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- James H Lynch
- The Stellate Institute, 116 Defense Highway, Suite 203, Annapolis, MD 21401, USA
| | - Sean W Mulvaney
- The Stellate Institute, 116 Defense Highway, Suite 203, Annapolis, MD 21401, USA
| | - Craig J Bryan
- College of Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210, USA
| | - David Hernandez
- The Retreat at Sheppard Pratt, 6501 N Charles Street, Baltimore, MD 21204, USA
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Shi ZM, Jing JJ, Xue ZJ, Chen WJ, Tang YB, Chen DJ, Qi XY, Huang L, Zou YQ, Wu XZ, Yang F. Stellate ganglion block ameliorated central post-stroke pain with comorbid anxiety and depression through inhibiting HIF-1α/NLRP3 signaling following thalamic hemorrhagic stroke. J Neuroinflammation 2023; 20:82. [PMID: 36944982 PMCID: PMC10031944 DOI: 10.1186/s12974-023-02765-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 35] [Impact Index Per Article: 17.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/28/2022] [Accepted: 03/12/2023] [Indexed: 03/23/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Central post-stroke pain (CPSP) is an intractable and disabling central neuropathic pain that severely affects patients' lives, well-being, and socialization abilities. However, CPSP has been poorly studied mechanistically and its treatment remains challenging. Here, we used a rat model of CPSP induced by thalamic hemorrhage to investigate its underlying mechanisms and the effect of stellate ganglion block (SGB) on CPSP and emotional comorbidities. METHODS Thalamic hemorrhage was produced by injecting collagenase IV into the ventral-posterolateral nucleus (VPL) of the right thalamus. The up-and-down method with von Frey hairs was used to measure the mechanical allodynia. Behavioral tests were carried out to examine depressive and anxiety-like behaviors including the open field test (OFT), elevated plus maze test (EPMT), novelty-suppressed feeding test (NSFT), and forced swim test (FST). The peri-thalamic lesion tissues were collected for immunofluorescence, western blotting, and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Genetic knockdown of thalamic hypoxia-inducible factor-1α (HIF-1α) and NOD-like receptor thermal protein domain associated protein 3 (NLRP3) with microinjection of HIF-1α siRNA and NLRP3 siRNA into the VPL of thalamus were performed 3 days before collagenase injection into the same regions. Microinjection of lificiguat (YC-1) and MCC950 into the VPL of thalamus were administrated 30 min before the collagenase injection in order to inhibited HIF-1α and NLRP3 pharmacologically. Repetitive right SGB was performed daily for 5 days and laser speckle contrast imaging (LSCI) was conducted to examine cerebral blood flow. RESULTS Thalamic hemorrhage caused persistent mechanical allodynia and anxiety- and depression-like behaviors. Accompanying the persistent mechanical allodynia, the expression of HIF-1α and NLRP3, as well as the activities of microglia and astrocytes in the peri-thalamic lesion sites, were significantly increased. Genetic knockdown of thalamic HIF-1α and NLRP3 significantly attenuated mechanical allodynia and anxiety- and depression-like behaviors following thalamic hemorrhage. Further studies revealed that intra-thalamic injection of YC-1, or MCC950 significantly suppressed the activation of microglia and astrocytes, the release of pro-inflammatory cytokines, the upregulation of malondialdehyde (MDA), and the downregulation of superoxide dismutase (SOD), as well as mechanical allodynia and anxiety- and depression-like behaviors following thalamic hemorrhage. In addition, repetitive ipsilateral SGB significantly restored the upregulated HIF-1α/NLRP3 signaling and the hyperactivated microglia and astrocytes following thalamic hemorrhage. The enhanced expression of pro-inflammatory cytokines and the oxidative stress in the peri-thalamic lesion sites were also reversed by SGB. Moreover, LSCI showed that repetitive SGB significantly increased cerebral blood flow following thalamic hemorrhage. Most strikingly, SGB not only prevented, but also reversed the development of mechanical allodynia and anxiety- and depression-like behaviors induced by thalamic hemorrhage. However, pharmacological activation of thalamic HIF-1α and NLRP3 with specific agonists significantly eliminated the therapeutic effects of SGB on mechanical allodynia and anxiety- and depression-like behaviors following thalamic hemorrhage. CONCLUSION This study demonstrated for the first time that SGB could improve CPSP with comorbid anxiety and depression by increasing cerebral blood flow and inhibiting HIF-1α/NLRP3 inflammatory signaling.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhong-Mou Shi
- Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Fuzong Clinical College (900th Hospital of the Joint Logistic Support Force), Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, 350025, China
- Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Dongfang Hospital, Xiamen University, Fuzhou, 350025, China
| | - Jun-Jie Jing
- Department of Neurosurgery, Fujian Children's Hospital, College of Clinical Medicine for Obstetrics and Gynecology and Pediatrics, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, 350025, China
| | - Zheng-Jie Xue
- Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Fuzong Clinical College (900th Hospital of the Joint Logistic Support Force), Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, 350025, China
- Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Dongfang Hospital, Xiamen University, Fuzhou, 350025, China
| | - Wen-Jun Chen
- Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Fuzong Clinical College (900th Hospital of the Joint Logistic Support Force), Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, 350025, China
- Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Dongfang Hospital, Xiamen University, Fuzhou, 350025, China
| | - Yan-Bin Tang
- Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Fuzong Clinical College (900th Hospital of the Joint Logistic Support Force), Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, 350025, China
- Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Dongfang Hospital, Xiamen University, Fuzhou, 350025, China
| | - Du-Juan Chen
- Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Fuzong Clinical College (900th Hospital of the Joint Logistic Support Force), Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, 350025, China
- Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Dongfang Hospital, Xiamen University, Fuzhou, 350025, China
| | - Xin-Yi Qi
- Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Fuzong Clinical College (900th Hospital of the Joint Logistic Support Force), Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, 350025, China
- Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Dongfang Hospital, Xiamen University, Fuzhou, 350025, China
| | - Li Huang
- Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Fuzong Clinical College (900th Hospital of the Joint Logistic Support Force), Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, 350025, China
- Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Dongfang Hospital, Xiamen University, Fuzhou, 350025, China
| | - Yi-Qing Zou
- Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Fuzong Clinical College (900th Hospital of the Joint Logistic Support Force), Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, 350025, China.
- Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Dongfang Hospital, Xiamen University, Fuzhou, 350025, China.
| | - Xiao-Zhi Wu
- Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Fuzong Clinical College (900th Hospital of the Joint Logistic Support Force), Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, 350025, China.
- Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Dongfang Hospital, Xiamen University, Fuzhou, 350025, China.
| | - Fei Yang
- Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Fuzong Clinical College (900th Hospital of the Joint Logistic Support Force), Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, 350025, China.
- Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Dongfang Hospital, Xiamen University, Fuzhou, 350025, China.
- Pain Research Institute, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, 350025, China.
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Lipov E, Sethi Z, Nandra G, Frueh C. Efficacy of combined subanesthetic ketamine infusion and cervical sympathetic blockade as a symptomatic treatment of PTSD/TBI in a special forces patient with a 1-year follow-up: A case report. Heliyon 2023; 9:e14891. [PMID: 37089345 PMCID: PMC10119561 DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e14891] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/30/2022] [Revised: 03/13/2023] [Accepted: 03/21/2023] [Indexed: 03/29/2023] Open
Abstract
Co-occurrence of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and traumatic brain injury (TBI) symptoms are particularly prevalent in the special operations forces' community, along with other related conditions (e.g., endocrine dysregulation, sleep disorders, chronic pain). Ketamine infusion (KI) has been shown to increase neuroplasticity as well as memory improvement and cervical sympathetic block (CSB) has been shown to improve cognitive function, reduce sympathetic overactivity, and improve other symptoms of PTSD. We want to report the efficacious use of a single intervention consisting of bilateral CSB technique with subanesthetic KI X5 in a Special Operations Forces patient, diagnosed with PTSD with comorbid TBI, evaluated during treatment and at 1-year follow-up. We postulated KI and CSB would have a synergistic effect. Our patient received KI starting at 0.5 mg/kg, which was escalated daily. KI was combined with right-sided ultrasound-guided CSB (C6 and C4 levels). This was followed the next day by left-sided CSB and KI. Patient's PTSD symptoms were evaluated using the Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Checklist (PCL-5), Beck Depression Inventory (BDI), Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI), suicidal ideation and other related factors by Concise Health Risk Tracking Self Report (CHRTSR). All measures were assessed prior to treatment, during treatment, and 394 days after. KI combined with CSB showed immediate and prolonged benefits 394 days later regarding the symptoms of PTSD, anxiety, depression, suicidal ideation, and cognitive deterioration (patient report). KI combined with CSB can markedly reduce symptoms of PTSD, psychiatric comorbidities, and cognitive dysfunction.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eugene Lipov
- Stella Center, Chicago, United States
- Corresponding author.
| | - Zubin Sethi
- Midwestern University Chicago College of Osteopathic Medicine, United States
| | | | - Christopher Frueh
- Department of Psychology, University of Hawaii, Hilo, HI, United States
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Sussman D, Tassone VK, Gholamali Nezhad F, Wu M, Adamsahib F, Mattina GF, Pazmino-Canizares J, Demchenko I, Jung H, Lou W, Ladha KS, Bhat V. Local Injection for Treating Mood Disorders (LIFT-MOOD): A Pilot Feasibility RCT of Stellate Ganglion Block for Treatment-Resistant Depression. CHRONIC STRESS (THOUSAND OAKS, CALIF.) 2023; 7:24705470231160315. [PMID: 36895443 PMCID: PMC9989395 DOI: 10.1177/24705470231160315] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/07/2022] [Accepted: 02/13/2023] [Indexed: 03/06/2023]
Abstract
Background With nearly one-third of patients with major depressive disorder being resistant to available antidepressants, there is a need to develop new treatments for this population. Stellate ganglion block (SGB) is a procedure used to block sympathetic input to the central autonomic system; it has been administered to treat several conditions, including pain. Recently, indications for SGB have extended and the potential benefits for psychiatric disorders are under investigation. Methods The Local Injection For Treating Mood Disorders (LIFT-MOOD) study investigated the feasibility of a trial of 2 right-sided injections of bupivacaine 0.5% (7 mL) at the stellate ganglion in participants with treatment-resistant depression (TRD) using a randomized, placebo-controlled, pilot trial. Ten participants were randomized in a 1:1 allocation to receive active treatment or placebo (saline). Primary feasibility outcomes included recruitment rate, withdrawal, adherence, missing data, and adverse events. As a secondary, exploratory objective, we explored the efficacy of SGB in improving symptoms of depression by calculating the change in scores from baseline to follow-up on day 42 for each treatment group. Results The recruitment rate was reasonable and sufficient, retention and adherence were high, missing data were low, and adverse events were mild and temporary. Both treatment groups demonstrated decreases in Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale scores, compared to baseline, by the end of the study. Conclusion This study supports the feasibility of a confirmatory trial of SGB in participants with TRD. Conclusions regarding efficacy cannot be made based on this preliminary study due to the small number of participants who completed active treatment. Larger-scale randomized controlled trials with long-term follow-ups and alternate sham procedures are needed to assess the efficacy and duration of symptom improvement with the use of SGB in TRD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David Sussman
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Department of Anesthesia, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Vanessa K Tassone
- Interventional Psychiatry Program, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | | | - Michelle Wu
- Interventional Psychiatry Program, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Fathima Adamsahib
- Interventional Psychiatry Program, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | | | | | - Ilya Demchenko
- Interventional Psychiatry Program, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Temerty Faculty of Medicine, Institute of Medical Science, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Hyejung Jung
- Department of Biostatistics, Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Wendy Lou
- Department of Biostatistics, Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Karim S Ladha
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Department of Anesthesia, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Venkat Bhat
- Interventional Psychiatry Program, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Temerty Faculty of Medicine, Institute of Medical Science, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Neuroscience Research Program, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Department of Psychiatry, Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Peterson AL, Straud CL, Young-McCaughan S, McCallin JP, Hoch M, Roux NP, Koch L, Lara-Ruiz J, Roache JD, Hein JM, Blount TH. Combining a stellate ganglion block with prolonged exposure therapy for posttraumatic stress disorder: A nonrandomized clinical trial. J Trauma Stress 2022; 35:1801-1809. [PMID: 36050896 DOI: 10.1002/jts.22873] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/18/2022] [Revised: 07/16/2022] [Accepted: 07/17/2022] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
Prolonged exposure therapy (PE) is an efficacious treatment for active duty service members and veterans with posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). However, PE is sometimes associated with high dropout rates, limited tolerability, and temporary symptom exacerbation during treatment. Stellate ganglion blocks (SGBs) are an emerging treatment that has the potential to enhance outcomes for PTSD when combined with trauma-focused psychotherapy. To date, no study of which we are aware has examined the potential additive benefits of SGB injections when administered in conjunction with trauma-focused behavioral treatment for PTSD. Thus, we conducted a nonrandomized clinical trial to evaluate the use of an SGB combined with massed PE therapy for combat-related PTSD. Participants (N = 12) were treated with 10 daily 90-min PE sessions delivered over 2 weeks and received a single SGB injection between Sessions 1 and 2. PE sessions lasted 90 min each. Participants reported a mean posttreatment PTSD symptom reduction of 32 points on the PTSD Checklist for DSM-5 (PCL-5), Hedges' gs = 1.28-2.80. Most participants (90.9%) demonstrated clinically significant change on the PCL-5 (i.e., ≥10 points) by the final treatment session and 50.0% no longer met the diagnostic criteria for PTSD per the Clinician-Administered PTSD Scale for DSM-5 at 1-month follow-up. Adverse events for the combined treatment were consistent with those previously reported for standalone SGB and PE. This combined treatment approach provides promising results for improving the tolerability of trauma-focused therapies, reducing symptom severity, and increasing PTSD remission rates.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alan L Peterson
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, Texas, USA.,Research and Development Service, South Texas Veterans Health Care System, San Antonio, Texas, USA.,Department of Psychology, University of Texas at San Antonio, San Antonio, Texas, USA
| | - Casey L Straud
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, Texas, USA.,Research and Development Service, South Texas Veterans Health Care System, San Antonio, Texas, USA.,Department of Psychology, University of Texas at San Antonio, San Antonio, Texas, USA
| | - Stacey Young-McCaughan
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, Texas, USA.,Research and Development Service, South Texas Veterans Health Care System, San Antonio, Texas, USA
| | - John P McCallin
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Brooke Army Medical Center, Joint Base San Antonio-Fort Sam Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Matthew Hoch
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Brooke Army Medical Center, Joint Base San Antonio-Fort Sam Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Napoleon P Roux
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Brooke Army Medical Center, Joint Base San Antonio-Fort Sam Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Lauren Koch
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, Texas, USA
| | - Jose Lara-Ruiz
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, Texas, USA
| | - John D Roache
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, Texas, USA.,Research and Development Service, South Texas Veterans Health Care System, San Antonio, Texas, USA
| | | | - Tabatha H Blount
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, Texas, USA
| | -
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, Texas, USA
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Wang L, Yuan N, Li Y, Ma Q, Zhou Y, Qiao Z, Li S, Liu C, Zhang L, Yuan M, Sun J. Stellate ganglion block relieves acute lung injury induced by severe acute pancreatitis via the miR-155-5p/SOCS5/JAK2/STAT3 axis. Eur J Med Res 2022; 27:231. [PMID: 36333771 PMCID: PMC9636723 DOI: 10.1186/s40001-022-00860-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/18/2022] [Accepted: 10/06/2022] [Indexed: 11/06/2022] Open
Abstract
Acute lung injury (ALI), a prevalent complication of severe acute pancreatitis (SAP), is also a leading contributor to respiratory failure and even death of SAP patients. Here, we intended to investigate the function and mechanism of stellate ganglion block (SGB) in ameliorating SAP-induced ALI (SAP-ALI). We engineered an SAP-ALI model in rats and treated them with SGB. HE staining and the dry and wet method were implemented to evaluate pathological alterations in the tissues and pulmonary edema. The rats serum changes of the profiles of TNF-α, IL-6, IL-1β, and IL-10 were examined. The profiles of miR-155-5p and SOCS5/JAK2/STAT3 were detected. Functional assays were performed for confirming the role of miR-155-5p in modulating the SOCS5/JAK2/STAT3 pathway in pulmonary epithelial cells. Our findings revealed that SGB vigorously alleviated SAP rat lung tissue damage and lung edema and lessened the generation of pro-inflammatory cytokines TNF-α, IL-6, and IL-1β. SGB enhanced SOCS5 expression, hampered miR-155-5p, and suppressed JAK2/STAT3 pathway activation. As evidenced by mechanism studies, miR-155-5p targeted the 3′UTR of SOCS5 and repressed its expression, hence resulting in JAK2/STAT3 pathway activation. During animal trials, we discovered that SGB ameliorated SAP-ALI, boosted SOCS5 expression, and mitigated the levels of pro-inflammatory factors and miR-155-5p in the plasma. In vitro, miR-155-5p overexpression substantially facilitated pulmonary epithelial cell apoptosis, inflammation, and JAK2/STAT3 pathway activation and restrained SOCS5 expression. All in all, our work hinted that SGB could modulate the miR-155-5p/SOCS5/JAK2/STAT3 axis to alleviate SAP-ALI.
Collapse
|
19
|
Bajor LA, Balsara C, Osser DN. An evidence-based approach to psychopharmacology for posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) - 2022 update. Psychiatry Res 2022; 317:114840. [PMID: 36162349 DOI: 10.1016/j.psychres.2022.114840] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/12/2022] [Revised: 09/05/2022] [Accepted: 09/07/2022] [Indexed: 01/04/2023]
Abstract
Algorithms for posttraumatic stress disorder were published by this team in 1999 and 2011. Developments since then warrant revision. New studies and review articles from January 2011 to November 2021 were identified via PubMed and analyzed for evidence supporting changes. Following consideration of variations required by special patient populations, treatment of sleep impairments remains as the first recommended step. Nightmares and non-nightmare disturbed awakenings are best addressed with the anti-adrenergic agent prazosin, with doxazosin and clonidine as alternatives. First choices for difficulty initiating sleep include hydroxyzine and trazodone. If significant non-sleep PTSD symptoms remain, an SSRI should be tried, followed by a second SSRI or venlafaxine as a third step. Second generation antipsychotics can be considered, particularly for SSRI augmentation when PTSD-associated psychotic symptoms are present, with the caveat that positive evidence is limited and side effects are considerable. Anti-adrenergic agents can also be considered for general PTSD symptoms if not already tried, though evidence for daytime use lags that available for sleep. Regarding other pharmacological and procedural options, e.g., transcranial magnetic stimulation, cannabinoids, ketamine, psychedelics, and stellate ganglion block, evidence does not yet support firm inclusion in the algorithm. An interactive version of this work can be found at www.psychopharm.mobi.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laura A Bajor
- James A. Haley VA Hospital, Tampa, FL, United States; University of South Florida Morsani School of Medicine, Tampa, FL, United States; VA Boston Healthcare System and Harvard South Shore Psychiatry Residency Training Program, Brockton, MA, United States.
| | - Charmi Balsara
- HCA Healthcare East Florida Division GME/HCA FL Aventura Hospital, United States
| | - David N Osser
- VA Boston Healthcare System and Harvard South Shore Psychiatry Residency Training Program, Brockton, MA, United States
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Zhang G, Wang F, Ran Y, Liu D. Applications of the ultrasound-guided nerve block technique for nonanalgesic effects. IBRAIN 2022; 8:389-400. [PMID: 37786735 PMCID: PMC10528970 DOI: 10.1002/ibra.12061] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/25/2022] [Revised: 07/28/2022] [Accepted: 07/31/2022] [Indexed: 10/04/2023]
Abstract
The nerve block technique guided by ultrasound has been able to accurately block tiny nerves throughout the body in recent years. It has been increasingly used to treat multisystem diseases or analgesia in surgical patients, but the latter accounted for the vast majority of cases. The nonanalgesic effect of nerve blocks is also in wide demand. After searching ultrasound-guided nerve block works on the PubMed database, we systematically summarized the current clinical application of the nerve block technique and the unique role and related mechanism of nerve block in the prevention and treatment of multi-system diseases or symptoms, including disorders of the circulatory and respiratory systems, postoperative cognitive dysfunction, immune function, posttraumatic stress disorder, and postoperative digestive system, to put forward the potential prospective application in future and serve as a reference for future research of nerve block therapy in these diseases mentioned.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Guang‐Ting Zhang
- Department of AnesthesiologyAffiliated Hospital of Zunyi Medical UniversityZunYiGuizhouChina
| | - Feng‐Lin Wang
- Department of AnesthesiologyAffiliated Hospital of Zunyi Medical UniversityZunYiGuizhouChina
| | - Ying Ran
- Department of AnesthesiologyAffiliated Hospital of Zunyi Medical UniversityZunYiGuizhouChina
| | - De‐Xing Liu
- Department of AnesthesiologyAffiliated Hospital of Zunyi Medical UniversityZunYiGuizhouChina
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Zhu H, Yan H, Zhang Y. Effect of stellate ganglion injections guided by different approaches on hearing threshold in patients with sudden deafness. Am J Otolaryngol 2022; 43:103201. [PMID: 35490585 DOI: 10.1016/j.amjoto.2021.103201] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/30/2021] [Accepted: 09/05/2021] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The current study was conducted aimed at investigating the effect of stellate ganglion injection guided with different approaches on hearing threshold in patients harboring sudden deafness. METHODS There involved a total of 68 patients with sudden deafness in our study. The patients were randomly allocated into control group and study group, with 34 cases in each group. The control group and study group were respectively given conventional blind puncture block and ultrasound-guided stellate ganglion injection. The clinical efficacy, first puncture success rate, first block success rate, average block time, hearing threshold improvement value, vertigo disappearance time, hearing recovery time, hemorheological changes and complications of the two groups were compared. RESULTS The total effective rate of the study group was significantly higher than that of the control group (96.06 vs. 76.47%, P < 0.05). The first puncture success rate and the first block success rate of the study group were evidently higher than those of the control group, and the average block time of the study group was significantly shorter than that of the control group (P < 0.05). The improvement of hearing threshold in the study group was higher than that in the control group, and the time of vertigo disappearance and hearing recovery in the study group was shorter than that in the control group, with significant difference (P < 0.05). Before treatment, EAI, HCT and PV levels of the two groups were comparable (P > 0.05). After treatment, however, the levels of EAI, HCT and PV in the two groups were lower. Furthermore, the levels of EAI, HCT and PV in the study group were significantly lower compared with the control group (P < 0.05). The incidence of complications in the study group was significantly less than that in the control group (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION Ultrasound-guided stellate ganglion injection achieved beneficial effects in treating sudden deafness, which is available for wide clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hong Zhu
- Department of Otolaryngology, Cangzhou Central Hospital, Cangzhou, Hebei, China.
| | - Huafeng Yan
- Department of Otolaryngology, Cangzhou Central Hospital, Cangzhou, Hebei, China
| | - YanE Zhang
- Department of Otolaryngology, Renqiu People's Hospital, Renqiu, Hebei, China
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Deng W, Zhang Y, Xu J, Ye J. Buccal Acupuncture Combined with Stellate Ganglion Block in the Treatment of Intractable Vertigo Syndrome: A Case Report. ACUPUNCTURE ELECTRO 2021. [DOI: 10.3727/036012921x16264625521754] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
Intractable vertigo syndrome can be diagnosed after failure of routine treatments for benign paroxysmal positional vertigo (BPPV). Stellate ganglion block can be used in patients who do not respond to oral medication. However, buccal acupuncture combined with stellate ganglion block
in the treatment of intractable vertigo syndrome has not been described yet. In this case report, we describe a patient who showed good response to combined treatment with buccal acupuncture and stellate ganglion block.
Collapse
|
23
|
Gibbons C, Porter I, Gonçalves-Bradley DC, Stoilov S, Ricci-Cabello I, Tsangaris E, Gangannagaripalli J, Davey A, Gibbons EJ, Kotzeva A, Evans J, van der Wees PJ, Kontopantelis E, Greenhalgh J, Bower P, Alonso J, Valderas JM. Routine provision of feedback from patient-reported outcome measurements to healthcare providers and patients in clinical practice. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2021; 10:CD011589. [PMID: 34637526 PMCID: PMC8509115 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd011589.pub2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 63] [Impact Index Per Article: 15.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patient-reported outcomes measures (PROMs) assess a patient's subjective appraisal of health outcomes from their own perspective. Despite hypothesised benefits that feedback on PROMs can support decision-making in clinical practice and improve outcomes, there is uncertainty surrounding the effectiveness of PROMs feedback. OBJECTIVES To assess the effects of PROMs feedback to patients, or healthcare workers, or both on patient-reported health outcomes and processes of care. SEARCH METHODS We searched MEDLINE, Embase, CENTRAL, two other databases and two clinical trial registries on 5 October 2020. We searched grey literature and consulted experts in the field. SELECTION CRITERIA Two review authors independently screened and selected studies for inclusion. We included randomised trials directly comparing the effects on outcomes and processes of care of PROMs feedback to healthcare professionals and patients, or both with the impact of not providing such information. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS Two groups of two authors independently extracted data from the included studies and evaluated study quality. We followed standard methodological procedures expected by Cochrane and EPOC. We used the GRADE approach to assess the certainty of the evidence. We conducted meta-analyses of the results where possible. MAIN RESULTS We identified 116 randomised trials which assessed the effectiveness of PROMs feedback in improving processes or outcomes of care, or both in a broad range of disciplines including psychiatry, primary care, and oncology. Studies were conducted across diverse ambulatory primary and secondary care settings in North America, Europe and Australasia. A total of 49,785 patients were included across all the studies. The certainty of the evidence varied between very low and moderate. Many of the studies included in the review were at risk of performance and detection bias. The evidence suggests moderate certainty that PROMs feedback probably improves quality of life (standardised mean difference (SMD) 0.15, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.05 to 0.26; 11 studies; 2687 participants), and leads to an increase in patient-physician communication (SMD 0.36, 95% CI 0.21 to 0.52; 5 studies; 658 participants), diagnosis and notation (risk ratio (RR) 1.73, 95% CI 1.44 to 2.08; 21 studies; 7223 participants), and disease control (RR 1.25, 95% CI 1.10 to 1.41; 14 studies; 2806 participants). The intervention probably makes little or no difference for general health perceptions (SMD 0.04, 95% CI -0.17 to 0.24; 2 studies, 552 participants; low-certainty evidence), social functioning (SMD 0.02, 95% CI -0.06 to 0.09; 15 studies; 2632 participants; moderate-certainty evidence), and pain (SMD 0.00, 95% CI -0.09 to 0.08; 9 studies; 2386 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). We are uncertain about the effect of PROMs feedback on physical functioning (14 studies; 2788 participants) and mental functioning (34 studies; 7782 participants), as well as fatigue (4 studies; 741 participants), as the certainty of the evidence was very low. We did not find studies reporting on adverse effects defined as distress following or related to PROM completion. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS PROM feedback probably produces moderate improvements in communication between healthcare professionals and patients as well as in diagnosis and notation, and disease control, and small improvements to quality of life. Our confidence in the effects is limited by the risk of bias, heterogeneity and small number of trials conducted to assess outcomes of interest. It is unclear whether many of these improvements are clinically meaningful or sustainable in the long term. There is a need for more high-quality studies in this area, particularly studies which employ cluster designs and utilise techniques to maintain allocation concealment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Ian Porter
- Health Services & Policy Research, University of Exeter Medical School, Exeter, UK
| | - Daniela C Gonçalves-Bradley
- Center for Health Technology and Services Research (CINTESIS), Porto, Portugal
- Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Stanimir Stoilov
- College of Medicine and Health, University of Exeter Medical School, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK
| | - Ignacio Ricci-Cabello
- Primary Care Research Unit, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Illes Balears, Palma de Mallorca, Spain
| | | | | | - Antoinette Davey
- Health Services and Policy Research Group, University of Exeter Medical School, Exeter, UK
| | - Elizabeth J Gibbons
- PROM Group, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Anna Kotzeva
- Health Technology Assessment Department, Agency for Health Quality and Assessment of Catalonia (AQuAS), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Jonathan Evans
- Health Services and Policy Research Group, University of Exeter Medical School, Exeter, UK
| | - Philip J van der Wees
- Radboud University Medical Center, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Scientific Institute for Quality of Healthcare (IQ healthcare), Nijmegen, Netherlands
| | - Evangelos Kontopantelis
- Centre for Health Informatics, Institute of Population Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Joanne Greenhalgh
- School of Sociology and Social Policy, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Peter Bower
- NIHR School for Primary Care Research, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Division of Population Health, Health Services Research and Primary Care, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Jordi Alonso
- CIBER Epidemiologia y Salud Publica (CIBERESP), IMIM-Hospital del mar, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Jose M Valderas
- Health Services & Policy Research, Exeter Collaboration for Academic Primary Care (APEx), NIHR School for Primary Care Research, NIHR ARC South West Peninsula (PenARC), University of Exeter, Exeter, UK
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Hughey S, Spevak C, Stedje-Larsen E. Military Pain Medicine: Sustaining the Fighting Force. Mil Med 2021; 187:84-87. [PMID: 34611703 DOI: 10.1093/milmed/usab419] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/02/2021] [Revised: 08/24/2021] [Accepted: 09/27/2021] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Active duty military service members (ADSMs) suffer disproportionately from chronic pain. In the USA, military pain physicians serve an important role in the treatment of pain conditions in addition to the maintenance of the fighting force. Expanding roles for pain physicians, including novel therapies, consulting roles for opioid policy, and usefulness in a deployed setting create enormous value for military pain physicians. Ongoing force structure changes, including proposed reduction in the U.S. Military's healthcare workforce may significantly impact pain care and the health of the fighting forces. Military pain physicians support a variety of different roles in the military healthcare system. Ultimately, maintaining a robust faculty of pain physicians allows for both preservation of the fighting forces and a ready medical force.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Scott Hughey
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Naval Medical Center Portsmouth, Portsmouth, VA 23708, USA.,Naval Biotechnology Group, Naval Medical Center Portsmouth, Portsmouth, VA 23708, USA
| | - Christopher Spevak
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, MD 20814, USA
| | - Eric Stedje-Larsen
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Naval Medical Center Portsmouth, Portsmouth, VA 23708, USA.,Naval Biotechnology Group, Naval Medical Center Portsmouth, Portsmouth, VA 23708, USA
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Hughey S, Schafer J, Cole J, Booth G, Tuttle R, Stedje-Larsen E. Ultrasound Versus Fluoroscopy for Stellate Ganglion Block: A Cadaveric Study. PAIN MEDICINE 2021; 22:2307-2310. [PMID: 34051103 DOI: 10.1093/pm/pnab182] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) is a common psychiatric disorder. Recent investigations have demonstrated effectiveness of Stellate Ganglion Blocks (SGB) for reducing symptoms associated with PTSD. Both fluoroscopic guided and ultrasound guided SGB have been described and are regularly used in clinical practice. This study sought to evaluate differences in block performance when comparing fluoroscopic versus ultrasound guided SGB. DESIGN Cadaveric Pilot Study. SETTING Academic Research Laboratory. SUBJECTS Ten Soft-Cured Human Cadavers. METHODS Ten soft-cured human cadavers were used after being at room temperature for 3 hours. Fluoroscopic and ultrasound guided injections were both performed on each cadaver, randomized to left or right sidedness. Seven mL of omnipaque and methylene blue (5:1) was injected in each side. Injectate spread was assessed by measuring vertebral body spread under fluoroscopy. Successful staining of the sympathetic trunk was assessed under cadaveric dissection, with visualization of the sympathetic trunk stained with methylene blue. RESULTS Ultrasound guided injections resulted in successful staining in 9 of 10 injections, while 6 of 10 for fluoroscopic guidance (p = 0.0=3034). The average spread in the ultrasound group was 4.0 compared with 5.2 for the fluoroscopic group (p=.088). In the four fluoroscopic guided injections which failed to stain, the injection occurred posterior to the prevertebral fascia. In the single ultrasound guided block that failed to stain, the injection was in the carotid sheath. CONCLUSION While there appeared to be a trend favoring ultrasound guidance, no statistical significance was achieved. This was likely due to this being a limited pilot study. Numerous limitations exist in cadaveric studies, and future investigations should be completed to further study this comparison. That said, the use of the SGB may provide significant relief for patients suffering with PTSD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Scott Hughey
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Naval Medical Center Portsmouth, Portsmouth, VA.,Naval Biotechnology Group, Naval Medical Center Portsmouth, Portsmouth, VA
| | - Jeffrey Schafer
- Department of Otolaryngology, Naval Medical Center Portsmouth, Portsmouth, VA
| | - Jacob Cole
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Naval Medical Center Portsmouth, Portsmouth, VA.,Naval Biotechnology Group, Naval Medical Center Portsmouth, Portsmouth, VA
| | - Gregory Booth
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Naval Medical Center Portsmouth, Portsmouth, VA.,Naval Biotechnology Group, Naval Medical Center Portsmouth, Portsmouth, VA
| | - Ralph Tuttle
- Department of Psychiatry, Naval Medical Center Portsmouth, Portsmouth, VA
| | - Eric Stedje-Larsen
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Naval Medical Center Portsmouth, Portsmouth, VA.,Naval Biotechnology Group, Naval Medical Center Portsmouth, Portsmouth, VA
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Lynch JH, Muench PD, Okiishi JC, Means GE, Mulvaney SW. Behavioral health clinicians endorse stellate ganglion block as a valuable intervention in the treatment of trauma-related disorders. J Investig Med 2021; 69:989-993. [PMID: 33727214 PMCID: PMC8223658 DOI: 10.1136/jim-2020-001693] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 02/18/2021] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
The stellate ganglion block (SGB) procedure has been used successfully for over 10 years to treat post-traumatic stress symptoms in thousands of US military service members, civilians, and veterans in select hospitals in Europe and North America. Primarily through targeting the autonomic nervous system, the SGB procedure serves as an invaluable adjunct to trauma-focused psychotherapy. Without published best practices for emerging therapies, clinicians are left on their own to determine how best to apply new treatments to their patient populations. The aim of this qualitative research was to compile attitudes and recommendations from therapists with expertise in using SGB for treating symptoms of post-traumatic stress disorder, so that their experiences could be disseminated widely to clinicians without SGB expertise. An 18-item survey was developed and distributed electronically to a group of behavioral health professionals of various specialties between May and June 2020. Of surveyed behavioral health clinicians with personal experience incorporating SGB into their trauma-focused psychotherapy, 95% of respondents would recommend SGB to a colleague as a useful tool for the treatment of trauma-related disorders. SGB was rated at least as useful as the most valuable interventions listed in the American Psychological Association Clinical Practice Guideline for the Treatment of Post-traumatic Stress Disorder with 100% of respondents characterizing SGB as ‘Very Beneficial’ or ‘Somewhat Beneficial’, and 0 respondents characterizing SGB as ‘Not Helpful’ or ‘Harmful’. Given the feedback from this study, behavioral health providers should consider using SGB in conjunction with standard trauma-focused care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- James H Lynch
- Department of Military and Emergency Medicine, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
| | - Peter D Muench
- Department of Primary Care, McDonald Army Health Center, Fort Eustis, Virginia, USA
| | - John C Okiishi
- Departments of Primary Care and Behavioral Health, Womack Army Medical Center, Fort Bragg, North Carolina, USA
| | - Gary E Means
- Departments of Primary Care and Behavioral Health, Womack Army Medical Center, Fort Bragg, North Carolina, USA
| | - Sean W Mulvaney
- Department of Military and Emergency Medicine, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Kerzner J, Liu H, Demchenko I, Sussman D, Wijeysundera DN, Kennedy SH, Ladha KS, Bhat V. Stellate Ganglion Block for Psychiatric Disorders: A Systematic Review of the Clinical Research Landscape. CHRONIC STRESS 2021; 5:24705470211055176. [PMID: 34901677 PMCID: PMC8664306 DOI: 10.1177/24705470211055176] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/11/2021] [Accepted: 10/06/2021] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
Abstract
Stellate ganglion block (SGB) is a procedure involving the injection of a local anesthetic surrounding the stellate ganglion to inhibit sympathetic outflow. The objective of this review was to summarize existing evidence on the use of SGB in adults with psychiatric disorders. A systematic search identified 17 published studies and 4 registered clinical trials. Eighty-eight percent of published studies, including 2 randomized controlled trials (RCTs), used SGB for posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), although its use for schizophrenia spectrum disorders was also explored. Administration of 1 to 2 SGBs using right-sided laterality with 0.5% ropivacaine was most common. Preliminary evidence from clinical trials and case studies supports the feasibility of SGB for treating psychiatric disorders involving dysregulation of the sympathetic nervous system, although effectiveness evidence from RCTs is mixed. One RCT concluded that improvement in PTSD symptoms was significant, while the other concluded that it was nonsignificant. Improvements were noted within 5 minutes of SGB and lasted 1 month or longer. Registered clinical trials are exploring the use of SGB in new psychiatric disorders, including major depressive disorder and borderline personality disorder. More studies with larger sample sizes and alternate protocols are needed to further explore therapeutic potential of SGB for psychiatric disorders.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jaimie Kerzner
- Interventional Psychiatry Program, Psychiatric Health and Addictions Service, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Helen Liu
- Interventional Psychiatry Program, Psychiatric Health and Addictions Service, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Ilya Demchenko
- Interventional Psychiatry Program, Psychiatric Health and Addictions Service, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - David Sussman
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Anesthesia, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Duminda N. Wijeysundera
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Anesthesia, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Sidney H. Kennedy
- Interventional Psychiatry Program, Psychiatric Health and Addictions Service, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Institute of Medical Science, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Karim S. Ladha
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Anesthesia, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Venkat Bhat
- Interventional Psychiatry Program, Psychiatric Health and Addictions Service, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Institute of Medical Science, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Lynch JH. Stellate ganglion block treats posttraumatic stress: An example of precision mental health. Brain Behav 2020; 10:e01807. [PMID: 32856430 PMCID: PMC7667325 DOI: 10.1002/brb3.1807] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/30/2020] [Accepted: 08/04/2020] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- James H Lynch
- Department of Military and Emergency Medicine, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, MD, USA
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Gouveia FV, Davidson B, Meng Y, Gidyk DC, Rabin JS, Ng E, Abrahao A, Lipsman N, Giacobbe P, Hamani C. Treating Post-traumatic Stress Disorder with Neuromodulation Therapies: Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation, Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation, and Deep Brain Stimulation. Neurotherapeutics 2020; 17:1747-1756. [PMID: 32468235 PMCID: PMC7851279 DOI: 10.1007/s13311-020-00871-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) is a prevalent and debilitating illness. While standard treatment with pharmacotherapy and psychotherapy may be effective, approximately 20 to 30% of patients remain symptomatic. These individuals experience depression, anxiety, and elevated rates of suicide. For treatment-resistant patients, there is a growing interest in the use of neuromodulation therapies, including transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS), transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), and deep brain stimulation (DBS). We conducted a systematic review on the use of neuromodulation strategies for PTSD and pooled 13 randomized clinical trials (RCTs), 11 case series, and 6 case reports for analysis. Overall, most studies reported favorable outcomes in alleviating both PTSD and depressive symptoms. Although several RCTs described significant differences when active and sham stimulations were compared, others found marginal or nonsignificant differences between groups. Also positive were studies comparing PTSD symptoms before and after treatment. The side effect profile with all 3 modalities was found to be low, with mostly mild adverse events being reported. Despite these encouraging data, several aspects remain unknown. Given that PTSD is a highly heterogeneous condition that can be accompanied by distinct psychiatric diagnoses, defining a unique treatment for this patient population can be quite challenging. There has also been considerable variation across trials regarding stimulation parameters, symptomatic response, and the role of adjunctive psychotherapy. Future studies are needed to address these issues.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Benjamin Davidson
- Harquail Centre for Neuromodulation, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, M4N 3M5, Canada
- Division of Neurosurgery, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, M4N 3M5, Canada
| | - Ying Meng
- Harquail Centre for Neuromodulation, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, M4N 3M5, Canada
- Division of Neurosurgery, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, M4N 3M5, Canada
| | | | - Jennifer S Rabin
- Sunnybrook Research Institute, 2075 Bayview Av, S126, Toronto, ON, M4N3M5, Canada
- Harquail Centre for Neuromodulation, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, M4N 3M5, Canada
- Division of Neurology, Department of Medicine, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, M4N 3M5, Canada
| | - Enoch Ng
- Harquail Centre for Neuromodulation, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, M4N 3M5, Canada
- Department of Psychiatry, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, M4N 3M5, Canada
| | - Agessandro Abrahao
- Sunnybrook Research Institute, 2075 Bayview Av, S126, Toronto, ON, M4N3M5, Canada
- Harquail Centre for Neuromodulation, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, M4N 3M5, Canada
- Division of Neurology, Department of Medicine, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, M4N 3M5, Canada
| | - Nir Lipsman
- Sunnybrook Research Institute, 2075 Bayview Av, S126, Toronto, ON, M4N3M5, Canada
- Harquail Centre for Neuromodulation, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, M4N 3M5, Canada
- Division of Neurosurgery, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, M4N 3M5, Canada
| | - Peter Giacobbe
- Sunnybrook Research Institute, 2075 Bayview Av, S126, Toronto, ON, M4N3M5, Canada
- Harquail Centre for Neuromodulation, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, M4N 3M5, Canada
- Department of Psychiatry, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, M4N 3M5, Canada
| | - Clement Hamani
- Sunnybrook Research Institute, 2075 Bayview Av, S126, Toronto, ON, M4N3M5, Canada.
- Harquail Centre for Neuromodulation, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, M4N 3M5, Canada.
- Division of Neurosurgery, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, M4N 3M5, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Moon S, Lee J, Jeon Y. Bilateral stellate ganglion block for migraine: A case report. Medicine (Baltimore) 2020; 99:e20023. [PMID: 32358380 PMCID: PMC7440256 DOI: 10.1097/md.0000000000020023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/12/2019] [Revised: 02/07/2020] [Accepted: 03/26/2020] [Indexed: 11/27/2022] Open
Abstract
RATIONALE Migraine is a recurrent, disabling neurovascular headache disorder. The patient's quality of life can be severely impaired by migraine attacks. Stellate ganglion block (SGB) can be used to relieve pain in the head, neck, and upper extremities. In the present cases, we performed SGB in 2 patients with migraine that responds poorly to drugs. PATIENT CONCERNS Patients 1 and 2 suffered from chronic, bilateral pulsating headache, accompanied by nausea and vomiting. Patient 1 presented with headache of 8 on the visual analog scale (VAS), and 37 on the migraine disability assessment (MIDAS). Patient 2 reported headache of 7 on the VAS, and 32 on the MIDAS. DIAGNOSIS The patients were diagnosed with migraine without aura based on the International Classification of Headache Disorders version 3. INTERVENTIONS Patient 1 was treated with bilateral SGB every week for a month and then every month for 3 months. Patient 2 received bilateral SGB every 2 weeks for a month and then every month for 3 months. OUTCOMES Four months after SGB, patient 1 reported pain intensity of 4 on VAS and 6 on MIDAS and patient 2 rated pain intensity of 3 on VAS, and 6 on MIDAS, respectively. LESSONS The SGB can be an effective option to improve headache-related disability and relieve pain intensity in the patients with refractory migraine.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Joonhee Lee
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine
| | - Younghoon Jeon
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, School of Dentistry, Kyungpook National University, Daegu, Republic of Korea
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Rae Olmsted KL, Bartoszek M, Mulvaney S, McLean B, Turabi A, Young R, Kim E, Vandermaas-Peeler R, Morgan JK, Constantinescu O, Kane S, Nguyen C, Hirsch S, Munoz B, Wallace D, Croxford J, Lynch JH, White R, Walters BB. Effect of Stellate Ganglion Block Treatment on Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Symptoms: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Psychiatry 2020; 77:130-138. [PMID: 31693083 PMCID: PMC6865253 DOI: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2019.3474] [Citation(s) in RCA: 81] [Impact Index Per Article: 16.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/04/2023]
Abstract
IMPORTANCE This is the first multisite, randomized clinical trial of stellate ganglion block (SGB) outcomes on posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) symptoms. OBJECTIVE To determine whether paired SGB treatments at 0 and 2 weeks would result in improvement in mean Clinician-Administered PTSD Scale for DSM-5 (CAPS-5) total symptom severity scores from baseline to 8 weeks. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS This multisite, blinded, sham-procedure, randomized clinical trial used a 2:1 SGB:sham ratio and was conducted from May 2016 through March 2018 in 3 US Army Interdisciplinary Pain Management Centers. Only physicians performing the procedures and the procedure nurses were aware of the intervention (but not the participants or assessors); their interactions with the participants were scripted and limited to the 2 interventions. Active-duty service members on stable psychotropic medication dosages who had a PTSD Checklist-Civilian Version (PCL-C) score of 32 or more at screening were included. Key exclusion criteria included a prior SGB treatment, selected psychiatric disorders or substance use disorders, moderate or severe traumatic brain injury, or suicidal ideation in the prior 2 months. INTERVENTIONS Paired right-sided SGB or sham procedures at weeks 0 and 2. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Improvement of 10 or more points on mean CAPS-5 total symptom severity scores from baseline to 8 weeks, adjusted for site and baseline total symptom severity scores (planned a priori). RESULTS Of 190 screened individuals, 113 (59.5%; 100 male and 13 female participants; mean [SD] age, 37.3 [6.7] years) were eligible and randomized (74 to SGB and 39 to sham treatment), and 108 (95.6% of 113) completed the study. Baseline characteristics were similar in the SGB and sham treatment groups, with mean (SD) CAPS-5 scores of 37.6 (11.2) and 39.8 (14.4), respectively (on a scale of 0-80); 91 (80.0%) met CAPS-5 PTSD criteria. In an intent-to-treat analysis, adjusted mean total symptom severity score change was -12.6 points (95% CI, -15.5 to -9.7 points) for the group receiving SGB treatments, compared with -6.1 points (95% CI, -9.8 to -2.3 points) for those receiving sham treatment (P = .01). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE In this trial of active-duty service members with PTSD symptoms (at a clinical threshold and subthreshold), 2 SGB treatments 2 weeks apart were effective in reducing CAPS-5 total symptom severity scores over 8 weeks. The mild-moderate baseline level of PTSD symptom severity and short follow-up time limit the generalizability of these findings, but the study suggests that SGB merits further trials as a PTSD treatment adjunct. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03077919.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Sean Mulvaney
- Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, Maryland
| | | | - Ali Turabi
- Landstuhl Regional Medical Center, Landstuhl, Germany
| | - Ryan Young
- Landstuhl Regional Medical Center, Landstuhl, Germany
| | - Eugene Kim
- Womack Army Medical Center, Fort Bragg, North Carolina
| | | | | | | | - Shawn Kane
- John F. Kennedy Special Warfare Center and School, Fort Bragg, North Carolina
| | | | - Shawn Hirsch
- RTI International, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina
| | - Breda Munoz
- RTI International, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina
| | - Dennis Wallace
- RTI International, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina
| | - Julie Croxford
- RTI International, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina
| | - James H. Lynch
- US Army Special Operations Command, Fort Bragg, North Carolina
| | - Ronald White
- Landstuhl Regional Medical Center, Landstuhl, Germany
| | | |
Collapse
|
32
|
Krystal JH, Davis LL, Neylan TC, Raskind M, Schnurr PP, Stein MB, Vessicchio J, Shiner B, Gleason TC, Huang GD. Reply to: It Is Time to Look for New Treatments for Posttraumatic Stress Disorder: Can Sympathetic System Modulation Be an Answer? Biol Psychiatry 2018; 84:e19-e20. [PMID: 29132654 DOI: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2017.09.031] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/20/2017] [Accepted: 09/30/2017] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- John H Krystal
- Departments of Psychiatry and Neuroscience, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut; Clinical Neuroscience Division, National Center for Posttraumatic Stress Disorder, West Haven, Connecticut; Psychiatry Services, VA Connecticut Healthcare System, West Haven, Connecticut.
| | - Lori L Davis
- Research and Development Service, Tuscaloosa VA Medical Center, Tuscaloosa, Alabama; Department of Psychiatry, University of Alabama School of Medicine, Birmingham, Alabama
| | - Thomas C Neylan
- Department of Psychiatry, University of California, San Francisco, California; San Francisco VA Medical Center, San Francisco, California
| | - Murray Raskind
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington; VA Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, Washington
| | - Paula P Schnurr
- Executive Division, National Center for Posttraumatic Stress Disorder, White River Junction, Vermont; Department of Psychiatry, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, White River Junction, Vermont
| | - Murray B Stein
- Departments of Psychiatry and Family Medicine & Public Health, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla; VA San Diego Healthcare System, San Diego, California
| | - Jennifer Vessicchio
- Clinical Neuroscience Division, National Center for Posttraumatic Stress Disorder, West Haven, Connecticut; Psychiatry Services, VA Connecticut Healthcare System, West Haven, Connecticut
| | - Brian Shiner
- Executive Division, National Center for Posttraumatic Stress Disorder, White River Junction, Vermont; Department of Psychiatry, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, White River Junction, Vermont
| | | | - Grant D Huang
- VA Cooperative Studies Program Central Office, VA Office of Research and Development, Washington, DC
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Zhao HY, Yang GT, Sun NN, Kong Y, Liu YF. Efficacy and safety of stellate ganglion block in chronic ulcerative colitis. World J Gastroenterol 2017; 23:533-539. [PMID: 28210090 PMCID: PMC5291859 DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v23.i3.533] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/25/2016] [Revised: 10/18/2016] [Accepted: 11/16/2016] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
AIM To investigate the efficacy and safety of stellate ganglion block for the treatment of patients with chronic ulcerative colitis.
METHODS A total of 120 randomly selected patients with chronic ulcerative colitis treated in Cangzhou Central Hospital from January 2014 to January 2016 were included in this study. These patients were divided into two groups: control group (n = 30), patients received oral sulfasalazine treatment; experimental group (n = 90), patients received stellate ganglion block treatment. Clinical symptoms and disease activity in these two groups were compared before and after treatment using endoscopy. Blood was collected from patients on day 0, 10, 20 and 30 after treatment. Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay was performed to determine interleukin-8 (IL-8) level. The changes in IL-8 level post-treatment in the two groups were compared using repeated measures analysis of variance.
RESULTS After treatment, clinical symptoms and disease activity were shown to be alleviated by endoscopy in both the control and experimental groups. However, patients in the control group did not have obvious abdominal pain relief. In addition, the degree of pain relief in the experimental group was statistically better than that in the control group (P < 0.05). Ten days after treatment, IL-8 level was found to be significantly lower in the experimental group than in the control group, and the difference was statistically significant (P < 0.05). In addition, adverse events were significantly higher in the control group than in the experimental group, and the difference was statistically significant (χ2 = 33.215, P = 0.000).
CONCLUSION The application of stellate ganglion block effectively improves treatment efficacy in chronic ulcerative colitis, relieves clinical symptoms in patients, and reduces the level of inflammatory factors. Furthermore, this approach also had a positive impact on the disease to a certain extent.
Collapse
|
34
|
Summers MR, Nevin RL. Stellate Ganglion Block in the Treatment of Post-traumatic Stress Disorder: A Review of Historical and Recent Literature. Pain Pract 2016; 17:546-553. [DOI: 10.1111/papr.12503] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/08/2016] [Revised: 06/27/2016] [Accepted: 07/11/2016] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Mary R. Summers
- Department of Mental Health; Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health; Baltimore Maryland U.S.A
| | - Remington L. Nevin
- Department of Environmental Health & Engineering; Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health; Baltimore Maryland U.S.A
| |
Collapse
|