Dual-Epidural Catheter Technique and Perioperative Outcomes After Ivor-Lewis Esophagectomy

Comparison of the effects of perineural or intravenous dexamethasone on thoracic paravertebral block in Ivor‐Lewis esophagectomy: A double‐blind randomized trial

Efforts to prolong thoracic paravertebral block (TPVB) analgesia include local anesthetic adjuvants, such as dexamethasone (Dex). Previous studies showed that both perineural (PN) and intravenous (i.v.) routes could prolong analgesia. As PN Dex is an off‐label use, anesthesiologists should be fully informed of the clinical differences, if any, on block duration. This study was designed to evaluate the two administration routes of Dex for duration of analgesia in TPVB. Ninety‐five patients scheduled for Ivor‐Lewis esophagectomy were randomized to receive TPVB (0.5% ropivacaine 15 ml), PN or i.v. Dex 8 mg. The primary end point was the duration of analgesia. The secondary end points included pain scores, analgesic consumption, adverse effects rate, and incidence of chronic pain at 3 months postoperatively. The PN‐Dex group showed better analgesic effects than the i.v.‐Dex group (p < 0.05). Similarly, the visual analogue scale scores in patients at 2, 4, 8, and 12 h postoperatively were lower in the PN‐Dex group than the i.v.‐Dex group (p < 0.05). The analgesic consumption in both the PN‐Dex and i.v.‐Dex groups was significantly lower than that in the control group (p < 0.05). Regarding the incidence of chronic pain, regardless of route, Dex decreased the incidence of chronic postsurgical pain and neuropathic pain at 3 months after surgery (p < 0.05), but there were no clinical differences between the i.v.‐Dex and PN‐Dex groups. Perineural dexamethasone improved the magnitude and duration of analgesia compared to that of the i.v.‐Dex group in TPVB in Ivor‐Lewis esophagectomy. However, there were no clinically significant differences between the two groups in the incidence of chronic pain.

Dual epidural catheter technique to provide opioid-free anaesthesia for an open abdominoperineal resection

The peri-operative analgesic management of patients undergoing major elective colorectal surgery has an impact on patient recovery. An approach that favours an opioid-free strategy has demonstrated improved patient outcomes. Avoiding systemic opioids during and after abdominal surgery promotes early recovery of bowel function and early re-initiation of oral intake, shortens hospital length of stay, minimises postoperative complications, and may improve long-term outcomes. In this case report we describe an opioid-free anaesthetic technique, in line with current Enhanced Recovery After Surgery recommendations, for a patient undergoing an open abdominoperineal resection who reported experiencing severe side-effects to opioids in the past. Two epidural catheters were sited pre-operatively at the interspaces between the ninth and tenth thoracic and third and fourth lumbar vertebrae respectively, and used intra- and postoperatively. The utilisation of two epidural catheters not only ensured complete peri-operative analgesia, but also successfully attenuated the neuroendocrine stress response to surgery. The dual epidural catheter technique may be considered for extensive colorectal surgery when conventional opioid-based anaesthetic techniques are contraindicated.

Continuous epidural anesthesia with double catheters for cesarean section in a patient with severe pulmonary hypertension: A case report

RATIONALE

Pregnancy in a woman with pulmonary hypertension (PH) carries prohibitively high risks of cardiopulmonary complications and high maternal and fetal morbidity and mortality. Anaesthetic management during delivery or cesarean section is very important for the prognosis of pregnant women with PH. The choice between general anesthesia or intraspinal anesthesia is controversial. There have been few case reports of anesthetic management under continuous epidural anesthesia with double catheters in such patients.

PATIENT CONCERNS

A 35-year-old pregnant woman presented to the emergency department with fatigue and shortness of breath for 10 days at 16 weeks of gestation.

DIAGNOSIS

According to transthoracic echocardiogram, her pulmonary artery pressure (PAP) was 75 mm Hg, and she had a dilated left ventricle (67 mm) and a ventricular septal defect (1.7 mm) with a bidirectional shunt.

INTERVENTIONS

Elective cesarean section under continuous epidural anesthesia with double catheters to terminate a pregnancy in order to avoid development of cardiac failure.

OUTCOMES

The pregnant woman underwent cesarean section safely and steadily under continuous epidural anesthesia with double catheters. She was discharged on the seventh postoperative day.

LESSONS

The advantages of continuous epidural anesthesia with double catheters are stable hemodynamics and complete analgesia. The continuous epidural anesthesia with double catheters can be applied to patients with cardiopulmonary disease like severe PH. Compared with general anesthesia, spinal anesthesia, and single-catheter epidural anesthesia continuous epidural anesthesia is a better option for patients with both PH and heart failure.

Postoperative analgesia after combined thoracoscopic-laparoscopic esophagectomy: a randomized comparison of continuous infusion and intermittent bolus thoracic epidural regimens

Purpose

Judicious postoperative pain management after thoracoscopic–laparoscopic esophagectomy (TLE) facilitates enhanced rehabilitation. Thoracic epidural analgesia (TEA) offers many benefits in esophagectomy, while several complications are associated with the delivery mode by continuous epidural infusion. This study compared the efficiency and safety of intermittent epidural bolus to continuous epidural infusion for pain management after TLE.

Patients and methods

Sixty patients, aged 18–80 years, with American Society of Anesthesiologists classes I–III and scheduled for TLE with combined general anesthesia and TEA were randomly allocated to two groups. Patients received either a continuous epidural infusion with 0.3% ropivacaine and 1.5 µg/mL fentanyl at 6 mL/h plus a patient-controlled bolus of 3 mL (continuous group) or an intermittent bolus of 6 mL of the same solution on demand with lockout time of 30 minutes (intermittent group). If the patient complained of pain and the visual analog scale score was >4, an intravenous injection of tramadol or dezocine was administered as rescue treatment. The primary outcome variable was the consumption of epidural opioids and local anesthetics for TEA.

Results

TEA for pain management following TLE by intermittent epidural bolus was associated with significantly lower consumption of fentanyl and ropivacaine and lower incidences of breakthrough pain and hypotension than continuous epidural infusion. No significant differences were observed between the two groups in terms of pain score at rest or while coughing, patient satisfaction, or incidence of postoperative complications.

Conclusion

Compared with continuous epidural infusion, TEA by on-demand intermittent bolus greatly reduced the consumption of local anesthetics and opioids with comparable pain relief and little impairment in hemodynamics when used for pain management after TLE.

Increased Risk of Postthoracotomy Pain Syndrome in Patients with Prolonged Hospitalization and Increased Postoperative Opioid Use

Background. Postthoracotomy pain syndrome (PTPS) is unfortunately very common following thoracotomy and results in decreased quality of life. The purpose of this retrospective study was to determine perioperative patient, surgical, and analgesic characteristics associated with the development of PTPS. Methods. Sixty-six patients who presented to the Mayo Clinic Rochester Pain Clinic were diagnosed with PTPS 2 months or more after thoracotomy with postoperative epidural analgesia. These patients were matched with sixty-six control patients who underwent thoracotomy with postoperative epidural analgesia and were never diagnosed with PTPS. Results. Median (IQR) hospital stay was significantly different between control patients (5 days (4, 6)) compared with PTPS patients (6 days (5, 8)), P < 0.02. The total opioid equivalent utilized in oral morphine equivalents in milligrams for the first three days postoperatively was significantly different between control patients and PTPS patients. The median (IQR) total opioid equivalent utilized was 237 (73, 508) for controls and 366 (116, 874) for PTPS patients (P < 0.005). Conclusion. Patients with a prolonged hospital stay after thoracotomy were at an increased risk of developing PTPS, and this is a novel finding. Patients who utilize higher oral morphine equivalents for the first 3 days were also at increased risk for PTPS.

[The program of accelerated rehabilitation after esophagoplasty (fast track surgery) in esophageal cancer surgery]

Esophagectomy with simultaneous plasty in patient with esophageal cancer is still associated with a high incidence of postoperative complications and long-stay patient in the clinic. The purpose of our report is to inform the use of the program of accelerated rehabilitation after esophagectomy in a prospective study of 13 patients during the period from 2010 to 2011 year and the role of the anesthesiologist in its implementation. Methods aimed at the preoperative examination, minimally invasive surgery, thoracic epidural anesthesia/analgesia with local anesthetics as a component of anesthesia and postoperative analgesia, early extubation and mobilization of the patient with the implementation of breathing exercises, early enteral feeding, and the planned short postoperative stay in resuscitation and hospital were used. Postoperative complications were observed in 3 (23/1%) patients: one patient (7/7%) had right-side pneumonia, two patients (15/4%) had right-side pneumothorax requiring emergency re drainage. The average intensive care stay was 2 (1-4) days, postoperative hospital stay--9 (7-12) days. Further monitoring of the patients did not show any long-term complications. The results confirm that it is possible to optimize the healing perioperative process in patients after esophagectomy with simultaneous plasty by using of accelerated rehabilitation program without the risk of increasing the frequency of postoperative complications. it will provide the reduction of length of hospital stay. In view of multifaceted and controversial issue the following researches in this direction are necessary.