How Consistent Is Competent? Examining Variance in Psychomotor Skills Assessment

Beyond the Procedure Log: Using Individualized Learning Plans to Set Learner-Specific Milestones for Procedural Skills Acquisition

ABSTRACT

Procedural training for nonsurgical fields, such as internal medicine, is an important component of medical education. However, recent changes to accreditation guidelines have resulted in less formal guidance on procedural competency, not only leading to opportunities for individualizing training but also creating potential problems for trainees and training programs. In this article, the authors use internal medicine as an exemplar to review current strategies for procedural education in nonsurgical fields, including procedural simulation, dedicated procedural rotations, and advanced subspecialty training, and highlight an emerging need for learner-specific terminal milestones in procedural training. Individualized learning plans (ILPs), collections of trainee-specific objectives for learning, are arguably a useful strategy for organizing procedural training. The role of ILPs as a framework to support setting learner-specific terminal milestones, guide skill acquisition, and allocate procedural learning opportunities based on trainees' anticipated career plans is subsequently explored, and how an ILP-based approach might be implemented within the complex educational milieu of a clinical training program is examined. The limitations and pitfalls of an ILP-based approach, including the need for development of coaching programs, are considered. The authors conclude that, despite the limitations of ILPs, when combined with other current strategies for building trainees' procedural competence, these plans may help trainees maximize the educational benefits of their training period and can encourage effective, safer, and equitable allocation of procedural practice opportunities.

How Clinical Supervisors Conceptualize Procedural Entrustment: An Interview-Based Study of Entrustment Decision Making in Endoscopic Training

PURPOSE

Entrustment is central to assessment in competency-based medical education (CBME). To date, little research has addressed how clinical supervisors conceptualize entrustment, including factors they consider in making entrustment decisions. The aim of this study was to characterize supervisors' decision making related to procedural entrustment, using gastrointestinal endoscopy as a test case.

METHOD

Using methods from constructivist grounded theory, the authors interviewed 29 endoscopy supervisors in the United States and Canada across multiple specialties (adult and pediatric gastroenterology, surgery, and family medicine). Semistructured interviews, conducted between April and November 2019, focused on how supervisors conceptualize procedural entrustment, how they make entrustment decisions, and what factors they consider. Transcripts were analyzed using constant comparison to generate an explanatory framework and themes.

RESULTS

Three themes were identified from the analysis of interview transcripts: (1) entrustment occurs in varying degrees and fluctuates over time; (2) entrustment decisions can transfer within and across procedural and nonprocedural contexts; (3a) persistent static factors (e.g., supervisor competence, institutional culture, legal considerations) influence entrustment decisions, as do (3b) fluctuating, situated dynamic factors (e.g., trainee skills, patient acuity, time constraints), which tend to change from one training encounter to the next.

CONCLUSIONS

In the process of making procedural entrustment decisions, clinical supervisors appear to synthesize multiple dynamic factors against a background of static factors, culminating in a decision of whether to entrust. Entrustment decisions appear to fluctuate over time, and assessors may transfer decisions about specific trainees across settings. Understanding which factors supervisors perceive as influencing their decision making has the potential to inform faculty development, as well as competency committees seeking to aggregate faculty judgments about trainee unsupervised practice. Those leading CBME programs may wish to invest in optimizing the observed static factors, such that these foundational factors are tuned to facilitate trainee learning and achievement of entrustment.

Resident Training and the Assessment of Orthopaedic Surgical Skills

Medical knowledge and technical skills are foundations of surgical competency. The American Board of Orthopaedic Surgery (ABOS) and the Resident Review Committee for Orthopaedic Surgery recently mandated simulation training to improve surgical skills, listing 17 surgical skills modules to improve residents' technical skills. However, there is no established tool to measure the effectiveness of these modules. The Global Index for Technical Skills (GRITS) tool has been previously validated for evaluating general surgery residents. The aim of this study was to determine whether the GRITS tool is valid, practical, and reliable in evaluating the skills of orthopaedic residents in a simulation setting, whether the outcomes correlate to performance in the operating room, and to what extent these simulation modules are valued by residents.

Current Evidence for Simulation-Based Training and Assessment of Myringotomy and Ventilation Tube Insertion: A Systematic Review

OBJECTIVE

Myringotomy and ventilation tube insertion (MT) is a key procedure in otorhinolaryngology and can be trained using simulation models. We aimed to systematically review the literature on models for simulation-based training and assessment of MT and supporting educational evidence.

DATABASES REVIEWED

PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, Directory of Open Access Journals.

METHODS

Inclusion criteria were MT training and/or skills assessment using all types of training modalities and learners. Studies were divided into 1) descriptive and 2) educational interventional/observational in the analysis. For descriptive studies, we provide an overview of available models including materials and cost. Educational studies were appraised using Kirkpatrick's level of educational outcomes, Messick's framework of validity, and a structured quality assessment tool.

RESULTS

Forty-six studies were included consisting of 21 descriptive studies and 25 educational studies. Thirty-one unique physical and three virtual reality simulation models were identified. The studies report moderate to high realism of the different simulators and trainees and educators perceive them beneficial in training MT skills. Overall, simulation-based training is found to reduce procedure time and errors, and increase performance as measured using different assessment tools. None of the studies used a contemporary validity framework and the current educational evidence is limited.

CONCLUSION

Numerous simulation models and assessment tools have been described in the literature but educational evidence and systematic implementation into training curricula is scarce. There is especially a need to establish the effect of simulation-based training of MT in transfer to the operating room and on patient outcomes.