Implicit Bias in Health Professions: From Recognition to Transformation

Participatory simulation training design: The MAMA interprofessional team-training program for obstetric care of pregnant individuals living with HIV in Tanzania

INTRODUCTION

Stigma towards women living with HIV (WLHIV) during childbirth can lead to suboptimal care and clinical outcomes. In this paper we describe the design of MAMA, a simulation team-training curriculum for labor and delivery (L&D) providers to reduce HIV stigma, provide more respectful maternity care (RMC), and improve clinical empathy.

METHODS

In order to adapt the PRONTO model of simulation training, we integrated and applied the ADAPT-ITT framework for systematic adaptation of evidence-based interventions (EBI) and participatory design principles to create a responsive and innovative program. This process ensured we met local needs through continuous and iterative input from stakeholders, enabling those who would benefit from the intervention to drive its creation.

RESULTS

The final intervention is a 2.5 days workshop, followed by a 2-hour in-situ refresher in the providers' clinical setting. The training centers simulation scenarios, teamwork and communication activities, and interactive lessons on principles of RMC, HIV stigma, prevention of mother-to-child transmission, implicit bias, teamwork, clinical empathy, and coping with burnout.

CONCLUSION

The ADAPT-ITT model, augmented by participatory design strategies, provides a systematic yet flexible process to adapt and contextualize EBIs. The use of these complementary approaches resulted in a locally grounded intervention to build provider confidence and skills caring for WLHIV giving birth and to improve RMC in facilities in Tanzania.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

NCT03600142.

From understanding to embracing: A guide on emotions in medical education research: AMEE Guide No. 184

Emotions refer to conscious and subjectively experienced mental reactions that are often associated with physiological and behavioral changes. In the context of medical education research, emotions have a pervasive influence on how various types of information are perceived and processed, and therefore, can influence how research is designed, conducted, and implemented. While there is considerable research on how emotions affect learning, there is little guidance for researchers on how to recognize and potentially leverage emotions while conducting and disseminating medical education research. Emotions can be potentially beneficial for fostering a stronger connection to research, increasing motivation to conduct sensitive research, and enhancing reflexivity and rigor. In this guide, the authors describe how emotions may influence medical education research while assisting researchers on how to recognize and manage emotions during the research process. This guide builds upon existing research to provide a framework for emotional reflexivity in the context of medical education research.

Effects of Implicit Racial Bias and Standardized Patient Race on Genetic Counseling Students' Patient-Centered Communication

Clinician racial bias has been associated with less patient-centered communication, but little is known about how it affects trainees' communication. We investigated genetic counseling students' communication during sessions with Black or White standardized patients (SPs) and the extent to which communication was associated with SP race or student scores on the Race Implicit Association Test (IAT). Sixty students conducted a baseline SP session and up to two follow-up sessions. Students were randomly assigned to a different White or Black SP and one of three clinical scenarios for each session. Fifty-six students completed the IAT. Session recordings were coded using the Roter Interaction Analysis System. Linear regression models assessed the effects of IAT score and SP race on a variety of patient-centered communication indicators. Random intercept models assessed the within-student effects of SP race on communication outcomes during the baseline session and in follow-up sessions (n = 138). Students were predominantly White (71%). Forty students (71%) had IAT scores indicating some degree of pro-White implicit preference. Baseline sessions with White relative to Black SPs had higher patient-centeredness scores. Within-participant analyses indicate that students used a higher proportion of back-channels (a facilitative behavior that cues interest and encouragement) and conducted longer sessions with White relative to Black SPs. Students' stronger pro-White IAT scores were associated with using fewer other facilitative statements during sessions with White relative to Black SPs. Different patterns of communication associated with SP race and student IAT scores were found for students than those found in prior studies with experienced clinicians.

Defensive Responses to Implicit Association Tests and Bias Awareness in an Implicit Bias Mitigation Training

Background

Implicit bias education that utilizes the Implicit Association Test (IAT) to raise self-awareness of bias can induce defensiveness.

Objective

To describe clinical learners' bias awareness, self-perceptions of bias relative to colleagues (better-than-average), implicit and explicit biases and defensive response to the IATs.

Design

Cross-sectional study.

Participants

Internal medicine and family medicine residents, and Doctor of Nursing Practice students at a public medical and nursing school affiliated with a disproportionate share hospital and who completed an implicit bias recognition and mitigation educational program (including didactics, IATs, and communication skills training and practice with standardized patients) in 2018-2019.

Main Measures

We measured implicit and explicit attitudes and stereotypes, reactions to IAT results (defensive or not defensive), better-than-average perceptions, bias awareness and participants' characteristics. We examined associations between defensive responses to the IAT and participant characteristics, self-reported explicit biases, bias awareness within self, society, and healthcare, and IAT scores.

Key Results

Of N=61 respondents, 57% were female and 59% White. We found moderate implicit bias favoring White people versus Black people, weak bias favoring White people versus Hispanic/Latinx people and moderate bias favoring White people on both race and ethnicity medical compliance stereotype IATs. Participants demonstrated awareness of bias in society and healthcare, but not within self. Eighteen percent were defensive regarding their IAT results. Perceptions of own bias (self) were always of their having less bias than their colleagues, and they were better-than-average. There were no statistically significant associations between IAT scores and participant demographics and no interaction effect between implicit bias, defensiveness and better-than-average scores.

Conclusion

Clinical learners hold moderate implicit biases, believe they have less bias than others, and almost 1-in-5 have a defensive response to IAT feedback. It is important to design implicit bias educational interventions to include reflection on personal bias and provide a safe environment to minimize defensiveness.

Structural stigma in healthcare: A novel eLearning course

Discrimination against individuals with Mental Health and Substance Use (MHSU) challenges adversely influences healthcare. To address shortcomings of existing anti-stigma interventions, a novel eLearning course on dismantling structural stigma was co-designed, piloted, implemented, and evaluated with diverse partners. The course aimed to foster reflection and evidence-informed approaches to recognize and address structural forms of stigma in healthcare contexts. Participants included self-identified health system leaders, influencers, and healthcare professionals (n = 528). Descriptive statistics and paired t-tests on pre- and post-evaluation data suggest that the course was perceived as relevant and useful for participants while enhancing their knowledge and skills. Overall, a web-based interactive eLearning course designed to improve knowledge, skills, and attitudes about structural stigma while challenging, transforming, and enlightening learners' beliefs and assumptions is an accessible tool with potential to produce sustained educational and practice-based outcomes and improve equity for individuals with MHSU challenges.

Discussion of Identity and Implicit Bias: A Strategy to Address Racism and Social Justice in Pediatric Nursing Education

ABSTRACT

Nurse educators must weave discussions of systemic racism, social justice, social determinants of health, and psychosocial influences throughout the curriculum. For an online pediatric course, an activity was developed to raise awareness of implicit bias. This experience interfused assigned readings from the literature, introspection of identity, and guided discussion. Framed by principles of transformative learning, faculty facilitated an online dialogue involving groups of 5 to 10 students through aggregated self-descriptors and open prompts. Ground rules for the discussion established psychological safety. This activity complements other schoolwide racial justice initiatives.

The criticality of reasonable accommodations: A scoping review revealing gaps in care for patients with blindness and low vision

BACKGROUND

Health and healthcare disparities for surgical patients with blindness and low vision (pBLV) stem from inaccessible healthcare systems that lack universal design principles or, at a minimum, reasonable accommodations (RA).

OBJECTIVES

We aimed to identify barriers to developing and implementing RAs in the surgical setting and provide a review of best practices for providing RAs.

METHODS

We conducted a search of PubMed for evidence of reasonable accommodations, or lack thereof, in the surgical setting. Articles related to gaps and barriers to providing RAs for pBLV or best practices for supporting RAs were reviewed for the study.

RESULTS

Barriers to the implementation of reasonable accommodations, and, accordingly, best practices for achieving equity for pBLV, relate to policies and systems, staff knowledge and attitudes, and materials and technology.

CONCLUSIONS

These inequities for pBLV require comprehensive frameworks that offer, maintain, and support education about disability disparities and RAs in the surgical field. Providing RAs for surgical pBLV, and all patients with disabilities is an important and impactful step towards creating a more equitable and anti-ableist health system.

'We're like Spider-Man; with great power comes great responsibility': Coaches' experiences supporting struggling medical students

BACKGROUND

Medical students can experience a range of academic and non-academic struggles. Coaching is a valuable strategy to support learners, but coaches describe working with struggling learners as taxing. Transformative learning theory (TLT) provides insights into how educators grow from challenging experiences to build resilience. This study explores how coaches evolve as educators through supporting struggling students.

METHODS

This qualitative study grounded in an interpretivist paradigm used interviews of longitudinal medical student coaches at two academic institutions. Interviews, using TLT as a sensitizing concept, explored coaches' experience coaching struggling learners. We performed thematic analysis.

RESULTS

We interviewed 15 coaches. Coaches described supporting students through multi-faceted struggles which often surprised the coach. Three themes characterized coaches' experiences: personal responsibility, emotional response, and personal learning. Coaches shouldered high personal responsibility for learners' success. For some, this burden felt emotional, raised parental instincts and questions about maintaining boundaries with learners. Coaches evolved their coaching approach, challenged biases, and built skills. Coaches learned to better appreciate the learner point of view and employ resources to support students.

DISCUSSION

Through navigating learner struggles, educators can gain self-efficacy, learn to understand learners' perspectives, and evolve their coaching approach to lessen their personal emotional burden through time.

Implicit and Explicit Race and Weight Biases Among Physician Assistant Preceptors and Trainees

INTRODUCTION

As new equity, diversity, and inclusion programs emerge in physician assistant/associate (PA) education, there is a need to assess baseline levels of implicit and explicit biases among PA preceptors' and trainees. The objectives of this study were (1) to measure implicit and explicit race (Black/White) and weight (fat/thin) biases among PA preceptors and trainees and (2) to identify potential gaps in PA preceptor and trainee education.

METHODS

This is a cross-sectional study of PA preceptors and trainees from one program operating in several US states; implicit and explicit race and antifat biases and receipt of prior education were measured.

RESULTS

Preceptor response rate was 6.4% (N = 78) from an eligible population of 1222, and trainee response rate was 25.7% (n = 43) from an eligible population of 167. Sixty-eight preceptor participants (87.2%) and 23 trainees (53.5%) identified as White. Preceptors held strong (Cohen d = 0.81), and trainees held moderate (Cohen d = 0.43) pro-White implicit bias. Overall, preceptors and trainees held little and no explicit race bias (Cohen d = 0.18 and d = 0.0, respectively). Preceptors and trainees held strong implicit antifat bias (Cohen d = 1.24 and Cohen d = 0.76). Preceptors held moderate explicit antifat bias (Cohen d = 0.65); trainees held strong explicit antifat bias (Cohen d = 0.95). Trainees received significantly more education on working with diverse populations compared with preceptors (100% vs. 57.7%, P < 0.001) and working with patients who are overweight (74.4% vs. 41.0%, P < 0.001).

DISCUSSION

Implicit race and antifat bias exists among our sample of PA preceptors and trainees. A gap in education for preceptors on working with diverse populations and patients who are overweight was identified. Future research should address both.

Seeing Ourselves in Others: Understanding and Addressing Biases in Medical School Admissions Processes

Purpose

Medical school admissions is a vital area for advancing diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI). Integrating bias recognition and management (BRM) within the context of admissions is critical in advancing DEI. However, there is a dearth of empirically informed literature on BRM in the admissions context. Therefore, this study sought to explore how individuals involved in admissions decisions process and integrate bias related feedback.

Methods

The authors conducted a qualitative exploratory study using constructivist grounded theory. 21 semi-structured interviews were conducted with various participants in the admissions process at a North American medical school who had participated in bias related training. Participants included medical school faculty, senior medical students, and community volunteers.

Results

Overall, participants expressed diverse perspectives on their personal biases and how these biases impact admissions decisions. Their reflections were shaped by their identities, values, and priorities, which varied based on whether they were faculty members, students, or community members. Participants also highlighted that their biases influenced their perceptions of the ideal admissions candidate, thus influencing their decision-making process. They emphasized the need for more opportunities to engage in dialogue with peers to openly share and discuss how to recognize and manage their biases.

Conclusion

Our study suggests that fostering critical reflection about identity tensions, building and sustaining a community of practice, and facilitating sustained dialogue may provide admissions committees with an evidence-informed, meaningful, and sustained approach to advancing DEI through bias recognition and management.

Using Group Concept Mapping to Explore Medical Education's Blind Spots

PHENOMENON

All individuals and groups have blind spots that can lead to mistakes, perpetuate biases, and limit innovations. The goal of this study was to better understand how blind spots manifest in medical education by seeking them out in the U.S.

APPROACH

We conducted group concept mapping (GCM), a research method that involves brainstorming ideas, sorting them according to conceptual similarity, generating a point map that represents consensus among sorters, and interpreting the cluster maps to arrive at a final concept map. Participants in this study were stakeholders from the U.S. medical education system (i.e., learners, educators, administrators, regulators, researchers, and commercial resource producers) and those from the broader U.S. health system (i.e., patients, nurses, public health professionals, and health system administrators). All participants brainstormed ideas to the focus prompt: "To educate physicians who can meet the health needs of patients in the U.S. health system, medical education should become less blind to (or pay more attention to) …" Responses to this prompt were reviewed and synthesized by our study team to prepare them for sorting, which was done by a subset of participants from the medical education system. GCM software combined sorting solutions using a multidimensional scaling analysis to produce a point map and performed cluster analyses to generate cluster solution options. Our study team reviewed and interpreted all cluster solutions from five to 25 clusters to decide upon the final concept map.

FINDINGS

Twenty-seven stakeholders shared 298 blind spots during brainstorming. To decrease redundancy, we reduced these to 208 in preparation for sorting. Ten stakeholders independently sorted the blind spots, and the final concept map included 9 domains and 72 subdomains of blind spots that related to (1) admissions processes; (2) teaching practices; (3) assessment and curricular designs; (4) inequities in education and health; (5) professional growth and identity formation; (6) patient perspectives; (7) teamwork and leadership; (8) health systems care models and financial practices; and (9) government and business policies.

INSIGHTS

Soliciting perspectives from diverse stakeholders to identify blind spots in medical education uncovered a wide array of issues that deserve more attention. The concept map may also be used to help prioritize resources and direct interventions that can stimulate change and bring medical education into better alignment with the health needs of patients and communities.

"Who You Are and Where You Live Matters": Hospice Care in New York City During COVID-19 Perspectives on Hospice and Social Determinants: A Rapid Qualitative Analysis

Context: Social determinants of health (SDOH) impacted the quality of home hospice care provided during the COVID-19 pandemic. Perspectives from professionals who provided care identify challenges and lessons learned from their experience. Objective: To examine hospice professionals' perspectives of how SDOH affected the delivery of high-quality home hospice care in New York City (NYC) during the COVID-19 pandemic. Methods: We conducted semistructured interviews with 30 hospice professionals who delivered care to home hospice patients during the COVID-19 pandemic in NYC using a qualitative descriptive design. Purposive sampling was used to recruit professionals from a range of disciplines including physicians, advanced practice providers, nurses, social workers, chaplains, and hospice administration and management. Participants worked for one of two large NYC metro hospices and one outpatient palliative care practice serving the five boroughs of NYC and the surrounding suburbs. Rapid qualitative analysis was used to identify themes. Results: Thirty hospice professionals were interviewed, spanning a variety of clinical and administrative roles. Most (21 out of 30) reported that social determinants affected access and/or delivery of equitable hospice care. Two key themes emerged from interviews: (1) SDOH exist and affect the delivery of high-quality care and (2) disparities were exacerbated during the COVID-19 pandemic resulting in barriers to care. Subthemes outline barriers described by hospice professionals: decreased hospice enrollment, telehealth challenges, resulting in deficient patient/family education, shortages of nursing assistants in some neighborhoods, and diminished overall quality of hospice care for some patients. SDOH created barriers to hospice care through neighborhood factors, resource barriers, and system challenges. Conclusion: SDOH provide a context to understand disparity in the provision of hospice care. COVID-19 exacerbated these conditions. Addressing multidimensional barriers created by SDOH is key in creating high-quality and equitable hospice care, particularly during a crisis.

Pedagogies of discomfort and disruption: A meta-narrative review of emotions and equity-related pedagogy

INTRODUCTION

Discussions about equity in professional education can evoke a range of complex emotions. Approaches to emotionally challenging pedagogies may vary across professions. Comparative explorations of these approaches may yield fresh insights that could enhance our teaching and learning strategies within health professions education. Therefore, the authors sought to explore how the professional contexts of medicine, nursing and teacher education approach the role of emotions in equity-related pedagogy.

METHODS

A meta-narrative approach was utilised to synthesise existing research on the relationship between emotions and equity-related pedagogy in three different professions. Six databases were searched using key terms yielding 3102 titles. After screening, 58 articles were selected for extraction. Through coding and analysis, the authors sought to gain a deeper understanding of why emotions are relevant to equity-related pedagogy in each profession, and how each profession grapples with emotional dissonance.

RESULTS

There were both contrasting and complimentary meta-narratives about emotions and equity-related learning in medicine, nursing and teacher education. All three professions viewed emotions as relevant and essential for equity-related learning. Medicine and nursing sought to make emotions accessible and explicit, while foregrounding the need for learners to build skills to understand and address emotions such as critical reflection and dialogue. Meta-narratives in teacher education were similar to medicine and nursing; however, teacher education further emphasised the role of emotions in fostering community, trust and empathy.

DISCUSSION

Existing meta-narratives regarding emotions and equity-related pedagogy in health professions suggest that medicine and nursing have acknowledged the intrinsic role that emotions play in equity-related learning yet lag behind teacher education in considering the role of emotions as a socio-cultural connector and mediator.

Virtual reality simulation for facilitating critical reflection and transformative learning: pedagogical, practical, and ethical considerations

There is growing recognition that preparing health professionals to work with complex social issues in the delivery of healthcare requires distinct theoretical and pedagogical approaches. Recent literature highlights the significance of employing simulated environments which aim to immerse learners in the experiences of diverse populations and bridge the gap between academic learning and lived realities across a diverse society. Virtual Reality (VR) is gaining traction as a promising pedagogical approach in this context. VR has been argued to offer distinct advantages over traditional educational methods by allowing learners to see the world through the eyes of diverse populations, and to learn about social injustices while immersed in a mediated environment. It also has practical benefits in its capacity to expose large number of students to these topics with relatively modest resources compared to other approaches. This debate article explores VR as an innovative pedagogical approach for facilitating critical reflection, dialogue and transformative learning about social issues in health professions education (HPE). It examines the potential affordances as well as risks and dangers of integrating VR into educational programs and highlights key pedagogical, practical, and ethical considerations. Emphasis is placed on the importance of these considerations in efforts toward ethical, safe, and respectful use of VR in educational settings. This paper contributes to the ongoing dialogue on VR simulation as an innovative approach to HPE and highlights the importance of creating conditions that maximize its educational benefits and minimize potential harms.

PEARLS debriefing for social justice and equity: integrating health advocacy in simulation-based education

Addressing health inequities in health professions education is essential for preparing healthcare workers to meet the demands of diverse communities. While simulation has become a widely recognized and effective method for providing safe and authentic clinical learning experiences, there has been limited attention towards the power of simulation in preparing health practitioners to work with groups who experience health disparities due to systems of inequality. Balancing technical proficiency with educational approaches that foster critical reflection and inform action oriented towards social accountability is essential. Transformational learning promotes the development of critical consciousness through critical reflection. Debriefing plays a crucial role in fostering learning in this direction by providing a structured opportunity to critically reflect on taken for granted assumptions, examine power and privilege embedded within systems and structures, and empower learners to take action toward changing those conditions. Building on the Promoting Excellence and Reflective Learning in Simulation (PEARLS) Healthcare Debriefing Tool, we propose a PEARLS Debriefing for Social Justice and Equity (DSJE) Tool that specifically directs attention to systems of inequality that contribute to health disparities for vulnerable groups across a range of simulation scenarios. This approach has two aims: (a) to transform debriefings into a critically reflective space by engaging learners in dialogue about social and structural determinants of health that may create or perpetuate inequities and (b) to foster critical reflection on what actions can be taken to improve the health and well-being of identified at risk and vulnerable groups. From this perspective, we can use the adapted PEARLS Tool to incorporate conversations about systems of inequality, equity, diversity, and inclusion (EDI) into our existing educational practices, and make concentrated efforts towards community-driven and socially conscious simulation-based education (SBE).

Artificial intelligence-generated feedback on social signals in patient-provider communication: technical performance, feedback usability, and impact

Objectives

Implicit bias perpetuates health care inequities and manifests in patient-provider interactions, particularly nonverbal social cues like dominance. We investigated the use of artificial intelligence (AI) for automated communication assessment and feedback during primary care visits to raise clinician awareness of bias in patient interactions.

Materials and Methods

(1) Assessed the technical performance of our AI models by building a machine-learning pipeline that automatically detects social signals in patient-provider interactions from 145 primary care visits. (2) Engaged 24 clinicians to design usable AI-generated communication feedback for their workflow. (3) Evaluated the impact of our AI-based approach in a prospective cohort of 108 primary care visits.

Results

Findings demonstrate the feasibility of AI models to identify social signals, such as dominance, warmth, engagement, and interactivity, in nonverbal patient-provider communication. Although engaged clinicians preferred feedback delivered in personalized dashboards, they found nonverbal cues difficult to interpret, motivating social signals as an alternative feedback mechanism. Impact evaluation demonstrated fairness in all AI models with better generalizability of provider dominance, provider engagement, and patient warmth. Stronger clinician implicit race bias was associated with less provider dominance and warmth. Although clinicians expressed overall interest in our AI approach, they recommended improvements to enhance acceptability, feasibility, and implementation in telehealth and medical education contexts.

Discussion and Conclusion

Findings demonstrate promise for AI-driven communication assessment and feedback systems focused on social signals. Future work should improve the performance of this approach, personalize models, and contextualize feedback, and investigate system implementation in educational workflows. This work exemplifies a systematic, multistage approach for evaluating AI tools designed to raise clinician awareness of implicit bias and promote patient-centered, equitable health care interactions.

Evaluating Patient Experiences with Patient-Centered and Inclusive Care in Academic Obstetrics and Gynecology Outpatient Clinics

Ensuring patient satisfaction is crucial in obstetrics and gynecology (OB/GYN) care. This study aimed to assess patient satisfaction and experiences with respectful and culturally competent care in an institution's OB/GYN clinics following the initiation of diversity, equity, and inclusion programming. A survey was conducted from September 2021 to February 2022 among patients who had completed outpatient OB/GYN visits, focusing on staff and provider cultural competency, treatment discussion, clinic accommodations, and comfort during sensitive exams. Results from 246 participants indicated that most had positive interactions with clinic staff and healthcare providers. However, disparities emerged, with black or African American participants reporting lower satisfaction and a higher incidence of unfair treatment due to race. These findings highlight the need for additional educational endeavors to equip clinical care teams with skills for providing respectful, inclusive, and culturally competent care. Future qualitative research can further explore patient experiences with inclusive practices in OB/GYN care.

Implementing a Critical Thinking Tool to Evaluate Educational Needs for Inpatient Rehabilitation Nurses

BACKGROUND

Most critical thinking assessment tools are resource intensive and require significant time and money to administer. Moreover, these tools are not tailored to evaluate critical thinking skills among inpatient rehabilitation facility (IRF) nurses. This pilot study explores the efficacy of using short videos to evaluate critical thinking for nurses working in an IRF.

METHODS

We developed and filmed 3 clinical scenarios representative of common IRF events that require critical thinking on behalf of the nurse. Thirty-one IRF nurses participated in the study and independently scored their own critical thinking skills using a visual analog scale. Using the same scale, nurse managers and assistant managers who worked closely with the nurses also rated the critical thinking ability of each nurse. The nurse then viewed and responded in narrative form to each of the 3 videos. A scoring rubric was used to independently evaluate the critical thinking skills for each nurse based on the nurses' responses.

RESULTS

Nurses rated their own critical thinking skills higher than mangers rated them (m = 85.23 vs 62.89). There was high interrater reliability for scoring video 1k (0.65), video 2k (0.90), and video 3k (0.84).

CONCLUSION

The results demonstrate efficacy for further study of low-cost alternatives to evaluate critical thinking among neuroscience nurses providing IRF care.

Occupying liminal spaces: The figured worlds of student affairs senior leaders in the United States

INTRODUCTION

Student Affairs Senior Leaders (SASLs) in the United States lead offices responsible for academic advising, administrative documentation, scheduling, student health, financial aid, and transition to residency, yet they infrequently draw attention in the field's literature. We explore the role of SASLs and how they describe the social space of medical education.

METHODS

Using a constructivist approach informed by Figured Worlds theory, we conducted a sequential narrative and thematic analysis of the stories SASLs tell about their roles and experiences in the world of medical education.

RESULTS

SASLs inhabit complex roles centred on advocating for medical students' academic, personal and social well-being. Their unique position within the medical school allows them to see the harm to vulnerable students made possible by misalignments inherent within medical education. Yet even with the challenges inherent in the environment, SASLs find reasons for hope.

CONCLUSION

SASLs' identities are full of potential contradictions, but they have a unique view into the often-chaotic world of medical education.

A narrative inquiry into non-Indigenous medical educators and leaders participation in reconciliatory work

INTRODUCTION

Globally, medical schools are operationalising policies and programming to address Indigenous health inequities. Although progress has been made, challenges persist. In Canada, where this research is conducted, Indigenous representation within medical schools remains low, leaving a small number of Indigenous advocates leading unprecedented levels of equity-related work, often with insufficient resources. The change needed within medical education cannot fall solely on the shoulders of Indigenous Peoples; non-Indigenous Peoples must also be involved. This work aims to better understand the pathways of those engaged in this work, with careful consideration given to the facilitators and barriers to ongoing engagement.

METHODS

Data collection and analysis were informed by narrative inquiry, a methodology that relies on storytelling to uncover nuance and prompt reflection. In this paper, we focus on interview data collected from Canadian non-Indigenous medical educators and leaders (n = 10). Participants represented different career stages, (early to late career) and occupied a mix of clinical, administrative and education roles.

RESULTS

Although each participant's entry into reconciliatory work was unique, we identified common drivers actuating their engagement. Oftentimes their participation was tied to administrative work or propelled by experiences within their roles that forced them to confront the systemic inequalities borne by Indigenous Peoples in both academic and healthcare settings. Some admitted to struggling with understanding their appropriate role in Indigenous reconciliation; their participation often proceeded without firm support.

CONCLUSION

Medical schools have an obligation to ensure their faculty, including non-Indigenous Peoples, are equipped to fulfil social accountability mandates regarding Indigenous health. Our findings generate a better understanding of the tensions inherent in this equity work. We urge others to reflect on their role in Indigenous reconciliation, or else medical schools risk generating a false sense of individual and institutional progress.

Understanding Implicit Bias and Its Impact in Veterinary Medicine

Implicit biases are those we are unwilling to admit, yet they influence our behavior in ways that impact our experience in the workplace. Literature demonstrates that implicit bias influences career choice and limits success within a chosen career. Discrimination in the veterinary workplace is pervasive and has a negative impact that is responsible for financial loss. It can also influence client communication, patient-care, and be inadvertently perpetuated by well-meaning community clinics. Strategies can be employed to acknowledge implicit bias and to foster behavioral change, which results in a healthier workplace and improved client and patient-care.

Using Structural Competencies for Faculty and Students to Integrate Principles of Social Justice and Health Equity Into a Doctor of Physical Therapy Program

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Integrating principles of social justice and health equity (SJHE) into Doctor of Physical Therapy (DPT) education may be one way to confront the root causes of health inequity. The purpose of this method/model presentation is to highlight structural competencies for faculty and students to integrate SJHE into a 3-year DPT program and a professional development program designed to provide core and clinical faculty with the tools to engage in critical discussions with students and support their development as agents of change.

METHOD/MODEL DESCRIPTION AND EVALUATION

This presentation highlights how SJHE structural competencies can be integrated into existing course content (as opposed to presented as a standalone course). Researchers interviewed 10 DPT faculty and 10 DPT students about their experience learning about SJHE. Six clinical instructors (CIs) who supervised students during a full-time clinical education experience (CEE) discussed students' ability to apply SJHE concepts during CEEs.

OUTCOMES

Faculty expressed the need for practice in low-stakes settings such as through simulation. Students valued learning about SJHE over 3 years with the opportunity to integrate content during CEEs but felt that SJHE could be better integrated in classroom content. Some peers were perceived to be resistant to SJHE. Clinical instructors described that although students were prepared to apply foundational SJHE concepts, students were surprised by the complexity of patient need.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION

Exploratory analysis of faculty, CI, and students' perceptions confirm that SJHE is needed in DPT education but takes time to integrate well with a steep learning curve and additional faculty development needs that must be met.

World Psychiatric Association-Asian Journal of Psychiatry Commission on Public Mental Health

Although there is considerable evidence showing that the prevention of mental illnesses and adverse outcomes and mental health promotion can help people lead better and more functional lives, public mental health remains overlooked in the broader contexts of psychiatry and public health. Likewise, in undergraduate and postgraduate medical curricula, prevention and mental health promotion have often been ignored. However, there has been a recent increase in interest in public mental health, including an emphasis on the prevention of psychiatric disorders and improving individual and community wellbeing to support life trajectories, from childhood through to adulthood and into older age. These lifespan approaches have significant potential to reduce the onset of mental illnesses and the related burdens for the individual and communities, as well as mitigating social, economic, and political costs. Informed by principles of social justice and respect for human rights, this may be especially important for addressing salient problems in communities with distinct vulnerabilities, where prominent disadvantages and barriers for care delivery exist. Therefore, this Commission aims to address these topics, providing a narrative overview of relevant literature and suggesting ways forward. Additionally, proposals for improving mental health and preventing mental illnesses and adverse outcomes are presented, particularly amongst at-risk populations.

Evaluation of Implicit Bias Training in Continuing Medical and Nursing Education to Address Racial Bias in Maternity Health Care Settings

OBJECTIVES

Implicit bias can affect clinical decisions that influence the care received by patients whose ancestors had been subjected to unfair medical and social practices. However, literature describing the effects of implicit bias training as part of continuing medical and nursing education is scarce. We conducted a longitudinal evaluation of a training for maternal health care clinical and nonclinical staff.

METHODS

A total of 80 staff members at 2 clinical sites in Cleveland, Ohio, participated in the training and evaluation in 2020 and 2021. We used a mixed-methods evaluation to capture changes in knowledge, awareness of bias, and application of strategies to reduce biased behavior by conducting pre- and posttraining surveys immediately after training and interviews at 3 and 6 months posttraining. We conducted univariate and bivariate analyses of the surveys and recorded, transcribed, and analyzed interviews for themes.

RESULTS

Using a threshold of answering 3 of 5 knowledge questions correctly, 50 of 80 (62.5%) trainees who engaged in the evaluation passed the pretraining knowledge questions and 67 (83.8%) passed the posttraining knowledge questions. Of the 80 participants, 75 (93.8%) were women. Interviewees (n = 11) said that low staff-to-patient ratios, lack of racial and ethnic diversity in leadership, inadequate training on implicit bias, and lack of institutional consequences for poor behavior exacerbated bias in maternity care. Interviewees reported having heightened awareness of bias and feeling more empowered after the training to advocate for themselves and patients to prevent and mitigate bias in the hospital.

CONCLUSION

Additional study describing the effect of implicit bias training as part of continuing medical education should be conducted, and administrative and management changes should also be made to prevent bias and improve quality of care.

Enhancing Our Workforce: Recruitment and Retention in Anesthesiology

Increasingly, both healthcare leaders and studies of healthcare outcomes recommend a medical workforce that is representative of the patient population as a method to reduce health disparities and medical costs. Anesthesiology remains a specialty with lower proportions of women and underrepresented in medicine (URiM) physicians as compared to the overall physician workforce, with 26.1% of anesthesiologists identifying as women and 31.3% of anesthesiologists as URiM. Two areas of focus are commonly identified when discussing inadequate representation in the workforce: recruitment into the specialty and retention in the profession. As medical educators, we provide a critical role in the recruitment and retention of women and URiM anesthesiologists, through implementation of processes, programs, and cultural change. Here, we will discuss the current problems of recruitment and retention of women and URiM anesthesiologists and suggest action plans for now and the future to enhance our specialty's diversity.

Design and pilot test of an implicit bias mitigation curriculum for clinicians

Introduction

Clinician implicit racial bias (IB) may lead to lower quality care and adverse health outcomes for Black patients. Educational efforts to train clinicians to mitigate IB vary widely and have insufficient evidence of impact. We developed and pilot-tested an evidence-based clinician IB curriculum, "REACHing Equity."

Methods

To assess acceptability and feasibility, we conducted an uncontrolled one-arm pilot trial with post-intervention assessments. REACHing Equity is designed for clinicians to: (1) acquire knowledge about IB and its impact on healthcare, (2) increase awareness of one's own capacity for IB, and (3) develop skills to mitigate IB in the clinical encounter. We delivered REACHing Equity virtually in three facilitated, interactive sessions over 7-9 weeks. Participants were health care providers who completed baseline and end-of-study evaluation surveys.

Results

Of approximately 1,592 clinicians invited, 37 participated, of whom 29 self-identified as women and 24 as non-Hispanic White. Attendance averaged 90% per session; 78% attended all 3 sessions. Response rate for evaluation surveys was 67%. Most respondents agreed or strongly agreed that the curriculum objectives were met, and that REACHing Equity equipped them to mitigate the impact of implicit bias in clinical care. Participants consistently reported higher self-efficacy for mitigating IB after compared to before completing the curriculum.

Conclusions

Despite apparent barriers to clinician participation, we demonstrated feasibility and acceptability of the REACHing Equity intervention. Further research is needed to develop objective measures of uptake and clinician skill, test the impact of REACHing Equity on clinically relevant outcomes, and refine the curriculum for uptake and dissemination.ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT03415308.

Confidence, Connection & Collaboration: Creating a Scalable Bias Reduction Improvement Coaching Train-the-Trainer Program to Mitigate Implicit Bias across a Medical Center

Problem: Academic medical centers need to mitigate the negative effects of implicit bias with approaches that are empirically-based, scalable, sustainable, and specific to departmental needs. Guided by Kotter's Model of Change to create and sustain cultural change, we developed the Bias Reduction Improvement Coaching Program (BRIC), a two-year, train-the-trainer implicit bias coaching program designed to meet the increasing demand for bias training across a university medical center. Intervention: BRIC trained a cohort of faculty and staff as coaches during four quarterly training sessions in Year 1 that covered 1) the science of bias, 2) bias in selection and hiring, 3) bias in mentoring, and 4) bias in promotion, retention, and workplace culture. In Year 2, coaches attended two booster sessions and delivered at least two presentations. BRIC raises awareness of bias mitigation strategies in a scalable way by uniquely building capacity through department-level champions, providing programming that addresses the 'local context,' and setting a foundation for sustained institutional change. Context: In a U.S. academic medical center, 27 faculty and staff from 24 departments were trained as inaugural BRIC coaches. We assessed outcomes at multiple levels: BRIC coach outcomes (feedback on the training sessions; coach knowledge, attitudes, and skills), departmental-level outcomes (program attendee feedback, knowledge, and intentions) and institutional outcomes (activities to sustain change). Impact: After Year 1, coaches reported high satisfaction with BRIC and a statistically significant increase in self-efficacy in their abilities to recognize, mitigate, and teach about implicit bias. In Year 2, attendees at BRIC coach presentations reported an increase in bias mitigation knowledge, and the majority committed to taking follow-up action (e.g., taking an Implicit Association Test). Coaches also launched activities for sustaining change at the broader university and beyond. Lessons Learned: The BRIC Program indicates a high level of interest in receiving bias mitigation training, both among individuals who applied to be BRIC coaches and among presentation attendees. BRIC's initial success supports future expansion. The model appears scalable and sustainable; future efforts will formalize the emerging community of practice around bias mitigation and measure elements of on-going institutional culture change.

Simulation as an educational tool to teach emergency medicine residents about unconscious bias

Medical training embraces simulation-based education. One important topic that has recently been added to the simulation curriculum at the University of Toronto is unconscious bias. This educational innovation project evaluates a simulation that could be used as a novel instructional design strategy to teach unconscious bias. The simulation involved two resuscitation scenarios with a similar clinical trajectory. Each resuscitation was led by standardized physicians of different binary genders, followed by a debrief with highly trained facilitators. Tangible educational takeaways on team dynamic variation between different gendered team leaders were discussed following the simulation, highlighting its benefit to resident education on bias awareness and response. Limitations include inevitable unconscious bias in facilitators and unequal gender representation in the learner participants, which may impact simulation effectiveness. The findings support translating this simulation to other forms of bias education in future simulation development.

Implementing a Critical Thinking Tool to Evaluate Educational Needs for Inpatient Rehabilitation Nurses

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Most critical thinking assessment tools are resource intensive and require significant time and money to administer. Moreover, these tools are not tailored to evaluate critical thinking skills among inpatient rehabilitation facility (IRF) nurses. This pilot study explores the efficacy of using short videos to evaluate critical thinking for nurses working in an IRF. METHODS: We developed and filmed 3 clinical scenarios representative of common IRF events that require critical thinking on behalf of the nurse. Thirty-one IRF nurses participated in the study and independently scored their own critical thinking skills using a visual analog scale. Using the same scale, nurse managers and assistant managers who worked closely with the nurses also rated the critical thinking ability of each nurse. The nurse then viewed and responded in narrative form to each of the 3 videos. A scoring rubric was used to independently evaluate the critical thinking skills for each nurse based on the nurses' responses. RESULTS: Nurses rated their own critical thinking skills higher than mangers rated them (m = 85.23 vs 62.89). There was high interrater reliability for scoring video 1k (0.65), video 2k (0.90), and video 3k (0.84). CONCLUSION: The results demonstrate efficacy for further study of low-cost alternatives to evaluate critical thinking among neuroscience nurses providing IRF care.

Designing Communication Feedback Systems To Reduce Healthcare Providers' Implicit Biases In Patient Encounters

Healthcare providers' implicit bias, based on patients' physical characteristics and perceived identities, negatively impacts healthcare access, care quality, and outcomes. Feedback tools are needed to help providers identify and learn from their biases. To incorporate providers' perspectives on the most effective ways to present such feedback, we conducted semi-structured design critique sessions with 24 primary care providers. We found that providers seek feedback designed with transparent metrics indicating the quality of their communication with a patient and trends in communication patterns across visits. Based on these metrics and trends, providers want this feedback presented in a dashboard paired with actionable, personalized tips about how to improve their communication behaviors. Our study provides new insights for interactive systems to help mitigate the impact of implicit biases in patient-provider communication. New systems that build upon these insights could support providers in making healthcare more equitable, particularly for patients from marginalized communities.

Disorienting or Transforming? Using the Arts and Humanities to Foster Social Advocacy

Introduction

The arts and humanities (AH) have transformative potential in medical education. Research suggests that AH-based pedagogies may facilitate both personal and professional transformation in medical learners, which may then further enhance the teaching and learning of social advocacy skills. However, the potential for such curricula to advance social advocacy training remains under-explored. Therefore, we sought to identify how AH may facilitate transformative learning of social advocacy in medical education.

Methods

Building upon previous research, we conducted a critical narrative review seeking examples from the literature on how AH may promote transformative learning of social advocacy in North American medical education. Through a search of seven databases and MedEdPORTAL, we identified 11 articles and conducted both descriptive and interpretative analyses of their relation to key tenets of transformative learning, including: disorientation/dissonance, critical reflection, and discourse/dialogue.

Results

We found that AH are used in varied ways to foster transformative learning in social advocacy. However, most approaches emphasize their use to elicit disorientation and dissonance; there is less evidence in the literature regarding how they may be of potential utility when applied to disorienting dilemma, critical reflection, and discourse/dialogue.

Discussion

The tremendous potential of AH to foster transformative learning in social advocacy is constrained due to minimal attention to critical reflection and dialogue. Future research must consider how novel approaches that draw from AH may be used for more robust engagement with transformative learning tenets in medical education.

Smartphone-Based Virtual and Augmented Reality Implicit Association Training (VARIAT) for Reducing Implicit Biases Toward Patients Among Health Care Providers: App Development and Pilot Testing

Background

Implicit bias is as prevalent among health care professionals as among the wider population and is significantly associated with lower health care quality.

Objective

The study goal was to develop and evaluate the preliminary efficacy of an innovative mobile app, VARIAT (Virtual and Augmented Reality Implicit Association Training), to reduce implicit biases among Medicaid providers.

Methods

An interdisciplinary team developed 2 interactive case-based training modules for Medicaid providers focused on implicit bias related to race and socioeconomic status (SES) and sexual orientation and gender identity (SOGI), respectively. The simulations combine experiential learning, facilitated debriefing, and game-based educational strategies. Medicaid providers (n=18) participated in this pilot study. Outcomes were measured on 3 domains: training reactions, affective knowledge, and skill-based knowledge related to implicit biases in race/SES or SOGI.

Results

Participants reported high relevance of training to their job for both the race/SES module (mean score 4.75, SD 0.45) and SOGI module (mean score 4.67, SD 0.50). Significant improvement in skill-based knowledge for minimizing health disparities for lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer patients was found after training (Cohen d=0.72; 95% CI -1.38 to -0.04).

Conclusions

This study developed an innovative smartphone-based implicit bias training program for Medicaid providers and conducted a pilot evaluation on the user experience and preliminary efficacy. Preliminary evidence showed positive satisfaction and preliminary efficacy of the intervention.

Racial Implicit Bias and Communication Among Physicians in a Simulated Environment

Importance

Racial implicit bias can contribute to health disparities through its negative influence on physician communication with Black patients. Interventions for physicians to address racial implicit bias in their clinical encounters are limited by a lack of high-fidelity (realistic) simulations to provide opportunities for skill development and practice.

Objective

To describe the development and initial evaluation of a high-fidelity simulation of conditions under which physicians might be influenced by implicit racial bias.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This cross-sectional study, performed on an online platform from March 1 to September 30, 2022, recruited a convenience sample of physician volunteers to pilot an educational simulation.

Exposures

In the simulation exercise, physicians saw a 52-year-old male standardized patient (SP) (presenting as Black or White) seeking urgent care for epigastric pain, nausea, and vomiting. The case included cognitive stressors common to clinical environments, including clinical ambiguity, stress, time constraints, and interruptions. Physicians explained their diagnosis and treatment plan to the SP, wrote an assessment and management plan, completed surveys, and took the Race Implicit Association Test (IAT) and Race Medical Cooperativeness IAT. The SPs, blinded to the purpose of the study, assessed each physician's communication using skills checklists and global rating scales.

Main Outcomes and Measures

Association between physicians' IAT scores and SP race with SP ratings of communication skills.

Results

In 60 physicians (23 [38.3%] Asian, 4 [6.7%] Black, 23 [38.3%] White, and 10 [16.7%] other, including Latina/o/x, Middle Eastern, and multiracial; 31 [51.7%] female, 27 [45.0%] male, and 2 [3.3%] other), the interaction of physicians' Race IAT score and SP race was significant for overall communication (mean [SD] β = -1.29 [0.41]), all subdomains of communication (mean [SD] β = -1.17 [0.52] to -1.43 [0.59]), and overall global ratings (mean [SD] β = -1.09 [0.39]). Black SPs rated physicians lower on communication skills for a given pro-White Race IAT score than White SPs; White SP ratings increased as physicians' pro-White bias increased.

Conclusions and Relevance

In this cross-sectional study, a high-fidelity simulation calibrated with cognitive stressors common to clinical environments elicited the expected influence of racial implicit bias on physicians' communication skills. The outlined process and preliminary results can inform the development and evaluation of interventions that seek to address racial implicit bias in clinical encounters and improve physician communication with Black patients.

Complex ADHD Challenging Case: When Simple Becomes Complex: Managing Clinician Bias and Navigating Challenging Family Dynamics in a 6-Year-Old Girl with ADHD and Developmental Delays

CASE

Layla is a 6.7-year-old girl diagnosed with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD)-predominantly hyperactive/impulsive type-delayed adaptive skills, enuresis, unspecified malnutrition, and feeding difficulties. She presented to developmental-behavioral pediatrics (DBP) in January 2022 due to caregiver concerns for autism spectrum disorder (ASD).Layla lives in a polyamorous family with her biological mother and father, mother's partner whom Layla refers to as her uncle, and her 2 half-siblings. There is a maternal history of special education services, schizoaffective disorder, bipolar disorder, multiple sclerosis, Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome, and ADHD. Layla's father is a veteran diagnosed with post-traumatic stress disorder. Layla's siblings, aged 5 and 9 years, have established diagnoses of ADHD, ASD, global developmental delays, behavioral concerns, and poor sleep. There is a history of adverse childhood experiences, including parental mental health, poverty, and involvement with child protective services. Acknowledgement and inclusion of all members of this diverse family structure, as well as consistent validation from the DBP and social worker, allowed a strong treatment alliance to form and the mother continued to contact the DBP clinic, even for those questions related to other specialties. A social worker received weekly calls from the mother sharing grievances related to feeling misunderstood and spoke about the assumptions she felt external providers made about her family, culture, and parenting styles. For example, she recalls the pediatrician commenting about their family structure being "confusing for the children" and describing their home as "chaotic," assumptions that may not have been made of nuclear family structures. Behavioral therapies were a repeated recommendation, but the mother verbalized not being interested in these options as she had participated in parent management training several years earlier and felt that the strategies taught were not applicable to her unique family structure, to which the clinician replied, "this is the standard recommendation for all children this age with disruptive behaviors." Although the mother was initially hesitant to trial medications, she eventually agreed that Layla's symptoms were negatively affecting her school performance, and the DBP initiated a stimulant medication.Layla's initial evaluation included a developmental history, behavioral observations, and standardized testing. The results from developmental testing demonstrated age equivalents between 4 and 6 years across gross motor, adaptive, visual motor, and speech-language domains.On observation, Layla was extremely active. During the visit, she walked over to her mother, made eye contact, and showed her the picture that she had drawn. She engaged in imaginary play, reciprocal conversation, and responded to social bids. The mother felt strongly that Layla had ASD and reported symptoms such as motor stereotypies (hand flapping), covering ears with certain noises/sounds, and rigidity when it came to things being a certain way or a certain color. These behaviors did not occur in the initial or subsequent clinic visits with DBP, her general pediatrician, or during other outside evaluations the mother pursued. The DBP felt strongly that Layla was mimicking her siblings' symptoms and provided ongoing education regarding ADHD symptomology.In terms of behavior management, the mother did not attempt to redirect Layla's behaviors during the initial clinic visit and in subsequent visits, and both adult men yelled loudly, clapped, and hit their hands on the table as a form of redirection. The mother continued to voice her diagnostic disagreement with the DBP and the pediatrician and insisted that Layla met the criteria for ASD. When the mother reviewed the report, a statement insinuating that Layla's behaviors were "understandable given parental inconsistency and complicated family structure" upset her.What factors would you consider when thinking about caregiver disagreement with the diagnosis and treatment plan? Does diagnostic overshadowing apply here?

Moving towards deep equity, diversity, inclusivity and accessibility in simulation: a call to explore the promises and perils

Principles and issues of equity, diversity, inclusivity, and accessibility (EDIA) are being explored currently in simulation designs and trainings but with limited depth, often raising more questions than answers. This editorial invites the broader healthcare simulation community to move beyond the superficial to explore more expansively and deeply these issues of EDIA within simulation. Simulation is the very environment and context from which we may confront how existing (power) structures can be dismantled and re-envisioned for more optimal redistribution of participation, power, and benefits. We can use simulation to experiment with variations of these realities, and start exploring consequences of such alternatives to benefit our broader health systems and societies. Simulation uniquely combines opportunities for experience, reflection, application and active experimentation, enabling a ripe ground for this study. In fact, it is the responsibility of simulation educators to take up this challenge, and to engage in meaningful scholarship to understand more about the impact of simulation in exploring EDIA topics. This editorial invites contributions of empirical and theoretical works that advance our collective understanding of EDIA, while also cautioning against complacency. The simulation community is urged to look inwards and also examine its own practices critically, in spite of the uncertainty, vulnerability and risks that this presents.

Is There an Implicit Racial Bias in the Case Order of Elective Total Joint Arthroplasty?

INTRODUCTION

Identifying ways to improve equitable access to healthcare is of the utmost important. In this study, we analyzed whether patient race was negatively associated with surgical start times for total joint arthroplasties (TJA).

METHODS

The surgical case order and start times of all primary TJAs performed at a large academic medical center between May 2014 and May 2018 were retrospectively reviewed. Patients were included if > 21, had a documented self-reported race, and were operated on by an arthroplasty fellowship-trained surgeon. Operations were categorized as first-start, early (7:00 AM-11:00 AM), mid-day (11:00 AM-3:00 PM), or late (after 3:00 PM). Multivariable logistic regression (MLR) was performed, and odds ratios (OR) were calculated.

RESULTS

This study identified 1663 TJAs-871 total knee (TKA) and 792 total hip arthroplasties (THA) who met inclusion criteria. Overall, there was no association between race and surgical start time. Upon sub-analysis by surgical type, this held true for TKA patients, but self-identifying Hispanic and non-Hispanic Black patients undergoing THA were more likely to have later surgical start times (ORs: 2.08 and 1.88; p < 0.05).

DISCUSSION

Although there was no association between race and overall TJA surgical start times, patients with marginalized racial and ethnic identities were more likely to undergo elective THA later in the surgical day. Surgeons should be aware of potential implicit bias when determining case order to potentially prevent adverse outcomes due to staff fatigue or lack of proper resources later in the day.

A narrative analysis of clerkship reflections: Medical student identity development in a changing world

BACKGROUND

Medical students' written reflections on their clinical experiences can be a useful tool for processing complex aspects of development as physicians. To create educational programs that scaffold adaptive professional identity development, it is essential to understand how medical students develop as professionals and process the dynamic sociocultural experiences of the current moment.

OBJECTIVE

To explore the developing professional consciousness of medical students through clerkship reflections.

DESIGN

Narrative analysis of written reflections are produced by clerkship students, who were asked to tell a story that resonated with the physician's relationship with patient, self and colleagues. Two independent readers applied inductive labels to generate a homogenous codebook, which was used to generate themes that were then used to construct a conceptual model.

KEY RESULTS

Four themes were identified in the data that describe relationships between medical students' developing professional identities and the norms of their future professional and personal communities. These included: medical students as outsiders, conflict between the student identifying with the patient versus the healthcare team, medical students' own value judgements and, finally, the changing societal mores as they relate to social and racial injustice. The conceptual model for this experience depicts the medical student as pulled between patients and the social context on one side and the professional context of the medical centre on the other. Students long to move towards identification with the healthcare team, but reject the extremes of medical culture that they view on conflict with social and racial justice.

CONCLUSIONS

Medical students in clinical training identify strongly with both patients and the medical team. Rather than viewing professional identity development as a longitudinal journey from one extreme to another, students have the power to call attention to entrenched problems within medical culture and increase empathy for patients by retaining their strong identification with the important issues of this time.

Implicit Bias Toward Lesbian and Gay Persons Among Nursing Students: A Correlation Study

AIM

The purpose of this study was to measure implicit bias among nursing students toward lesbian and gay (LG) persons.

BACKGROUND

Implicit bias is identified as a contributor to the health disparities experienced by LG persons. This bias has not been studied among nursing students.

METHOD

This descriptive, correlation study used the Implicit Association Test to measure implicit bias in a convenience sample of baccalaureate nursing students. Demographic information was collected to identify relevant predictor variables.

RESULTS

Implicit bias in this sample ( n = 1,348) favored straight persons over LG persons ( D -score = 0.22). Participants identifying as male ( B = 0.19), straight ( B = 0.65), other sexuality ( B = 0.33), somewhat ( B = 0.09) or very religious ( B = 0.14), or enrollment in an RN-BSN program ( B = 0.11) predicted stronger bias favoring straight persons.

CONCLUSION

Implicit bias toward LG persons among nursing students remains a challenge for educators.

CE: Reducing Bias Against People with Substance Use Disorders

ABSTRACT

Addiction is a highly misunderstood and stigmatized chronic illness frequently encountered by health care providers during routine medical care. People with substance use disorders, in particular, face extraordinary stigma and bias when interacting with health care providers, including nurses. Stigma associated with addiction contributes to health inequities and is recognized as a significant barrier to people seeking and receiving necessary health care. Since patients often spend the most time with nurses in the clinical setting, nurses are ideally positioned to address addiction stigma. However, many nurses lack knowledge about addiction, stigma, and the impact of the words they use, whether in conversation or in clinical documentation. This article reviews the consequences of addiction stigma (labeling, stereotyping, or discrimination) and the steps nurses can take to reduce biases related to substance use. A case scenario based on our experience will be used to guide a discussion of opportunities for nurses to intervene and improve care.

A scoping review to identify and organize literature trends of bias research within medical student and resident education

BACKGROUND

Physician bias refers to the unconscious negative perceptions that physicians have of patients or their conditions. Medical schools and residency programs often incorporate training to reduce biases among their trainees. In order to assess trends and organize available literature, we conducted a scoping review with a goal to categorize different biases that are studied within medical student (MS), resident (Res) and mixed populations (MS and Res). We also characterized these studies based on their research goal as either documenting evidence of bias (EOB), bias intervention (BI) or both. These findings will provide data which can be used to identify gaps and inform future work across these criteria.

METHODS

Online databases (PubMed, PsycINFO, WebofScience) were searched for articles published between 1980 and 2021. All references were imported into Covidence for independent screening against inclusion criteria. Conflicts were resolved by deliberation. Studies were sorted by goal: 'evidence of bias' and/or 'bias intervention', and by population (MS or Res or mixed) andinto descriptive categories of bias.

RESULTS

Of the initial 806 unique papers identified, a total of 139 articles fit the inclusion criteria for data extraction. The included studies were sorted into 11 categories of bias and showed that bias against race/ethnicity, specific diseases/conditions, and weight were the most researched topics. Of the studies included, there was a higher ratio of EOB:BI studies at the MS level. While at the Res level, a lower ratio of EOB:BI was found.

CONCLUSIONS

This study will be of interest to institutions, program directors and medical educators who wish to specifically address a category of bias and identify where there is a dearth of research. This study also underscores the need to introduce bias interventions at the MS level.

"Rater training" re-imagined for work-based assessment in medical education

In this perspective, the authors critically examine "rater training" as it has been conceptualized and used in medical education. By "rater training," they mean the educational events intended to improve rater performance and contributions during assessment events. Historically, rater training programs have focused on modifying faculty behaviours to achieve psychometric ideals (e.g., reliability, inter-rater reliability, accuracy). The authors argue these ideals may now be poorly aligned with contemporary research informing work-based assessment, introducing a compatibility threat, with no clear direction on how to proceed. To address this issue, the authors provide a brief historical review of "rater training" and provide an analysis of the literature examining the effectiveness of rater training programs. They focus mainly on what has served to define effectiveness or improvements. They then draw on philosophical and conceptual shifts in assessment to demonstrate why the function, effectiveness aims, and structure of rater training requires reimagining. These include shifting competencies for assessors, viewing assessment as a complex cognitive task enacted in a social context, evolving views on biases, and reprioritizing which validity evidence should be most sought in medical education. The authors aim to advance the discussion on rater training by challenging implicit incompatibility issues and stimulating ways to overcome them. They propose that "rater training" (a moniker they suggest be reserved for strong psychometric aims) be augmented with "assessor readiness" programs that link to contemporary assessment science and enact the principle of compatibility between that science and ways of engaging with advances in real-world faculty-learner contexts.

Recommendations for creating a collaborative NICU environment to support teamwork and trainee education

In a 2022 survey, a majority of neonatology program directors reported regular conflict between neonatal-perinatal fellows and frontline providers (FLPs) (i.e., neonatal nurse practitioners (NNPs), neonatal physician assistants (PAs), and neonatal hospitalists). This paper reviews recommendations of a multidisciplinary workgroup for creating a more collaborative unit environment that supports teamwork and education. The self-study framework is a helpful tool to identify specific pressure points at individual institutions. Implementing clear guidelines for procedural distribution and role clarification are often critical interventions. FLPs and Pediatric Physician Trainees may benefit from conflict management coaching and communication training. At the same time, we recommend that respective leaders support a psychologically safe environment for team members to feel safe to solve problems on their own. Going forward, more work is important to optimize teamwork in the setting of anticipated staffing shortages, limitations to resident neonatology exposure, changes in training requirements, and ongoing development of the FLP role.

Deconstructing the masculinized assumption of the medical profession: narratives of Japanese physician fathers

BACKGROUND

Gender studies in the medical profession have revealed gender biases associated with being a doctor, a profession often regarded as more suitable for men. The path to gender equality inevitably involves deconstructing this masculinized assumption. Despite the decades-long expectation that ikumen-men who actively participate in childcare in Japan-would contribute to a change toward gender equality, Japanese society is still male dominated, and women suffer from a large gender gap. With the aim of exploring implicit gendered assumptions concerning being a caregiver and a doctor, the authors focused on the experience of individuals juggling the binary roles of a professional and a caregiver.

METHODS

The authors conducted subjectivist inductive research, recruited ten Japanese physician fathers through purposive sampling, and collected data through one-to-one semi-structured interviews between October 2017 and December 2018. The authors recorded and transcribed the narrative data, and extracted themes and representative narratives.

RESULTS

The study identified three themes about the reproduction and potential change of the gender gap: maintaining gendered assumptions of the medical profession without experiencing conflict, maintaining gendered assumptions of the medical profession while experiencing conflict, and deconstructing gendered assumptions of the medical profession through conflict. The authors found that these negotiations interplayed with the gendered division of labor between male doctors and their wives as well as the patriarchal family structure.

CONCLUSIONS

The study revealed how gendered assumptions of the medical profession, as well as gender stereotypes and gendered division of household labor, were reproduced in the course of male doctors' negotiations when they became fathers. For male doctors to question their unconscious gender bias, the authors emphasize the importance of men gaining knowledge about gender stereotypes, and propose that educators create such opportunities. Moreover, the authors assert that increasing doctors' awareness of how masculinized assumptions implicitly interact with ideas of being a doctor-an aspect rarely discussed among medical professionals-is crucial for deconstructing the gendered normativity in the medical field.

The Impact of Treating Bilingual Clients on Speech-Language Pathology Students' Cultural Responsiveness

PURPOSE

Graduate programs often use practicum experience with clients from nonmajority cultures to improve students' cultural responsiveness. Yet, it is not clear whether simply working with a client from a nonmajority culture actually confers this benefit or whether students are thinking about how to include culturally responsive behaviors when they are considering how to address a clinical case.

METHOD

Twenty first-year speech-language pathology graduate students (10 Spanish-English bilinguals, 10 monolingual English speakers) were split into three groups: monolingual experimental (n = 4), bilingual experimental (n = 4), and control (n = 12). The experimental groups completed a structured practicum with bilingual Hispanic/Latino clients. They received a 1-hr training in cultural responsiveness and then implemented a systematic language intervention in English or Spanish. Changes to cultural responsiveness were measured via think-aloud cases, and changes to confidence were measured with published, self-report scales. Reflective journal entries revealed what aspects of the clinical practicum students found most salient.

RESULTS

Experience working with bilingual clients did not have a substantial effect on students' confidence in their cultural competence. No substantial change was found in cultural responsiveness on the think-aloud for any group. Cultural responsiveness did not appear to be top-of-mind for the students.

CONCLUSIONS

Simply working with clients from nonmajority cultures does not create a scenario where cultural responsiveness is likely to improve. Additional targeted, purposeful training in cultural responsiveness is necessary.

Cooking up Change: DEIB Principles as Key Ingredients in Nutrition and Culinary Medicine Education

The integration of diversity, equity, inclusion, and belonging (DEIB) principles into healthcare education is essential to ensure culturally sensitive and equitable healthcare delivery. In the domain of nutrition, food, and health, these principles are particularly vital, as diet and food choices are strongly linked to cultural identities and socioeconomic conditions. Despite a growth of DEIB initiatives in undergraduate and graduate medical education, there is a significant gap regarding guidelines for implementing DEIB principles in education around nutrition and food, including that for dietitians, allied health and medical professionals. A literature review was conducted, analyzing peer-reviewed articles and current practices in academic medical education to understand DEIB in nutrition, food, and health. The outcome was the creation of a three-tiered checklist titled "Checklist for Culturally Competent Education in Nutrition". It serves as a roadmap to cultivate culturally competent, equitable, and inclusive healthcare professionals that emphasizes avoiding bias, enhancing awareness, and building practical skills for DEIB implementation around nutrition.

How medical learners and educators decide what counts as mistreatment: A qualitative study

INTRODUCTION

The mistreatment or abuse (maltreatment) of medical learners by their peers and supervisors has been documented globally for decades, and there is significant research about the prevalence, sequelae and strategies for intervention. However, there is evidence that learners experience maltreatment as being less clear cut than do researchers, educators and administrators. This definitional ambiguity creates problems for understanding and addressing this issue. The objective of this study was to understand how medical learners and educators make sense of less-than-ideal interactions in the clinical learning environment, and to describe which factors influenced their perception that the encounter constituted maltreatment.

METHODS

Using constructivist grounded theory, we interviewed 16 medical students, 15 residents or fellows, and 18 educators associated with a single medical school (n = 49). Data collection began with the most junior learners, iterating with analysis as we progressed through the project. Constant comparative analysis was used to gather and compare stories of 'definitely', 'maybe' and 'definitely not' maltreatment across a variety of axes including experience level, clinical setting and type of interaction.

RESULTS

Our data show that learners and educators have difficulty classifying their experiences of negative interpersonal interaction, except in the most severe and concrete cases. While there was tremendous variation in the way they categorised similar experiences, there was consistency in the elements drawn upon to make sense of those experiences. Participants interpreted negative interpersonal interactions on an individual basis by considering factors related to the interaction, initiator and recipient.

CONCLUSIONS

Only the most negative behaviour is consistently understood as maltreatment; a complex process of individual sense-making is required to determine the acceptability of each interaction. The differences between how individuals judge these interactions highlight an opportunity for administrative, research and faculty development intervention.