Generalizability of the Ottawa Surgical Competency Operating Room Evaluation (O-SCORE) Scale to Assess Medical Student Performance on Core EPAs in the Workplace: Findings From One Institution

How Internal Medicine Clerkship Directors Are Using Entrustable Professional Activities: A National Survey Study

BACKGROUND

In the present assessment environment in undergraduate medical education at U.S. medical schools, the prevalence and implementation of Entrustable Professional Activities (EPAs) in internal medicine (IM) clerkships are not well understood.

OBJECTIVE

To describe the prevalence and approach to EPA use in U.S. IM clerkships.

DESIGN

Cross-sectional, nationally representative survey of core IM clerkship directors.

PARTICIPANTS

One-hundred forty IM clerkship directors at Liaison Committee on Medical Education-accredited U.S./U.S. territory-based allopathic medical schools with membership in the Clerkship Directors in Internal Medicine (CDIM) as of December 2022.

MAIN MEASURES

Use of EPAs in IM core clerkships, including use for grading, types of EPAs, use of supportive measures for assessment, and current validity frameworks.

KEY RESULTS

The survey response was 80% (112/140); two additional respondents completed the section on EPA use (n = 114). Approximately half of respondents (47%) reported their IM clerkship used EPAs. Among schools accredited after 1977, a higher percentage was associated with having incorporated EPAs (p = 0.03). The Association of American Medical Colleges Core EPAs for Entering Residency (CEPAER) was the most common framework used by Clerkship Directors (CDs) for developing EPAs (55%). Most CDs (56%) used EPAs for both formative and summative assessments, and approximately half of CDs (48%) used EPAs for a portion of the final grade determination. CDs who used EPAs were no more likely to report efforts to ensure the validity of assessment, the use of faculty development, or that written assessments were a valid measure of students' performance compared to those who did not use EPAs.

CONCLUSIONS

Although EPAs have experienced substantial uptake in the IM clerkship and contribute to formative and summative assessment of learners, their use does not appear to be associated with enhanced efforts to obtain validity information.

How well do workplace-based assessments support summative entrustment decisions? A multi-institutional generalisability study

BACKGROUND

Assessment of the Core Entrustable Professional Activities for Entering Residency requires direct observation through workplace-based assessments (WBAs). Single-institution studies have demonstrated mixed findings regarding the reliability of WBAs developed to measure student progression towards entrustment. Factors such as faculty development, rater engagement and scale selection have been suggested to improve reliability. The purpose of this investigation was to conduct a multi-institutional generalisability study to determine the influence of specific factors on reliability of WBAs.

METHODS

The authors analysed WBA data obtained for clerkship-level students across seven institutions from 2018 to 2020. Institutions implemented a variety of strategies including selection of designated assessors, altered scales and different EPAs. Data were aggregated by these factors. Generalisability theory was then used to examine the internal structure validity evidence of the data. An unbalanced cross-classified random-effects model was used to decompose variance components. A phi coefficient of >0.7 was used as threshold for acceptable reliability.

RESULTS

Data from 53 565 WBAs were analysed, and a total of 77 generalisability studies were performed. Most data came from EPAs 1 (n = 17 118, 32%) 2 (n = 10 237, 19.1%), and 6 (n = 6000, 18.5%). Low variance attributed to the learner (<10%) was found for most (59/77, 76%) analyses, resulting in a relatively large number of observations required for reasonable reliability (range = 3 to >560, median = 60). Factors such as DA, scale or EPA were not consistently associated with improved reliability.

CONCLUSION

The results from this study describe relatively low reliability in the WBAs obtained across seven sites. Generalisability for these instruments may be less dependent on factors such as faculty development, rater engagement or scale selection. When used for formative feedback, data from these instruments may be useful. However, such instruments do not consistently provide reasonable reliability to justify their use in high-stakes summative entrustment decisions.

Assessment of Entrustable Professional Activities Among Dutch Endocrine Supervisors

Entrustable Professional Activities (EPAs) are an important tool to support individualisation of medical training in a competency-based setting and are increasingly implemented in the clinical speciality training for endocrinologist. This study aims to assess interrater agreement and factors that potentially impact EPA scores. Five known factors that affect entrustment decisions in health profesions training (capability, integrity, reliability, humility, agency) were used in this study. A case-vignette study using standardised written cases. Case vignettes (n = 6) on the topics thyroid disease, pituitary disease, adrenal disease, calcium and bone disorders, diabetes mellitus, and gonadal disorders were written by two endocrinologists and a medical education expert and assessed by endocrinologists experienced in the supervision of residents in training. Primary outcome is the inter-rater agreement of entrustment decisions for endocrine EPAs among raters. Secondary outcomes included the dichotomous interrater agreement (entrusted vs. non-entrusted), and an exploration of factors that impact decision-making. The study protocol was registered and approved by the Ethical Review Board of the Netherlands Association for Medical Education (NVMO-ERB # 2020.2.5). Nine endocrinologists from six different academic regions participated. Overall, the Fleiss Kappa measure of agreement for the EPA level was 0.11 (95% CI: 0.03-0.22) and for the entrustment decision 0.24 (95% CI 0.11-0.37). Of the five features that impacted the entrustment decision, capability was ranked as the most important by a majority of raters (56%-67%) in every case. There is a considerable discrepancy between the EPA levels assigned by different raters. These findings emphasise the need to base entrustment decisions on multiple observations, made by a team of supervisors and enriched with factors other than direct medical competence.

A Qualitative Study of Drivers for Use of the Primary Care Exception Among Internal Medicine Teaching Faculty

BACKGROUND

The Primary Care Exception (PCE) is a billing rule from the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) that allows supervising physicians to bill for ambulatory care provided by a resident without their direct supervision. There has been increased focus on entrustment as a method to assess readiness for unsupervised practice.

OBJECTIVE

To understand the factors influencing attending physicians' use of the PCE in ambulatory settings and identify common themes defining what motivates faculty preceptors to use the PCE.

APPROACH

This was a qualitative exploratory study. Participants were interviewed one-on-one using a semi-structured template informed by the entrustment literature. Analysis was conducted using a thematically framed, grounded theory-based approach to identify major themes and subthemes.

PARTICIPANTS

Twenty-seven internal medicine teaching faculty took part in a multi-institutional study representing four residency training programs across two academic medical centers in Connecticut.

KEY RESULTS

Four predominant categories of themes influencing PCE use were identified: (1) clinical environment factors, (2) attending attitudes, (3) resident characteristics, and (4) patient attributes. An attending's "internal rules" drawn from prior experiences served as a significant driver of PCE non-use regardless of the trainee, patient, or clinical context. A common conflict existed between using the PCE to promote resident autonomy versus waiving the PCE to promote safety.

CONCLUSIONS

The PCE can serve as a tool to support resident autonomy, confidence, and overall clinical efficiency. Choice of PCE use by attendings involved complex internal decision-making schema balancing internal, patient, resident, and environmental-related factors. The lack of standardized processes in competency evaluation may increase susceptibility to biases, which could be mitigated by applying standardized modes of assessment that encompass shared principles.

Inconsistently reporting post-licensure EPA specifications in different clinical professions hampers fidelity and practice translation: a scoping review

BACKGROUND

Entrustable Professional Activities (EPAs) are defined units of professional practice entrusted to professionals once they have attained the specific competencies required to complete the end-to-end task. They provide a contemporary framework for capturing real-world clinical skillsets and integrating clinical education with practice. Our scoping review question was: how are post-licensure EPAs reported in peer reviewed literature, in different clinical professions?

METHOD

We followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) checklist, Arksey and O'Malley and Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) methodology. Searching ten electronic databases returned 1622 articles, with 173 articles included. Data extracted included demographics, EPA discipline, titles and further specifications.

RESULTS

All articles were published between 2007-2021 across sixteen country contexts. The majority were from North America (n = 162, 73%) describing medical sub-specialty EPAs (n = 126, 94%). There were comparably few EPA frameworks reported in clinical professions other than medicine (n = 11, 6%). Many articles reported only EPA titles without further explanation and limited content validation. The majority did not include information about the EPA design process. Few EPAs and frameworks were reported according to all the recommended EPA attributes. There was unclear distinction between specialty-specific EPAs and those that could be useful across disciplines.

DISCUSSION

Our review highlights the large volume of EPAs reported in post-licensure medicine, including the volume disparity compared to other clinical professions. Basing our enquiry upon existing guidelines for EPA attributes and features, our experience in conducting the review and our primary finding demonstrated heterogeneity of EPA reporting according to these specifications. To promote EPA fidelity, and quality appraisal, and to reduce interpretation subjectivity, we advocate: diligently reporting EPA attributes and features; including reference or citation to EPA design and content validity information; and considering distinguishing EPAs as specialty-specific or transdisciplinary.

CONCLUSION

A large volume of post-licensure EPAs were identified in medicine relative to other clinical professions. EPA specifications were absent or variously reported in the literature, risking ambiguous interpretation. The authors recommend that future EPAs are reported with reference to established and evolving construct recommendations, which is integral to concept fidelity and translation to practice and education.

A Tool to Assess Competence in Critical Care Ultrasound Based on Entrustable Professional Activities

Background

Existing assessment tools for competence in critical care ultrasound (CCUS) have limited scope and interrupt clinical workflow. The framework of entrustable professional activities (EPAs) is well suited to developing an assessment tool that is comprehensive and readily integrated into the intensive care unit (ICU) training environment.

Objective

This study sought to design an EPA-based tool to assess competence in CCUS for pulmonary and critical care fellows and to assess the validity and reliability of the tool.

Methods

Eight experts in CCUS met to define the core EPAs for CCUS. A nominal group technique was used to reach consensus. An assessment tool was created based on the EPAs with a modified Ottawa entrustability scale. Trained faculty evaluated pulmonary and critical care fellows using this tool in the ICU over a 6-month study period at a single institution. An assessment of validity of the EPA-based tool is made with four sources of validity evidence: content, response process, reliability, and relation to other variables. Reliability and response process data were generated using generalizability theory analysis to estimate sources of variance in entrustment scores. Analysis of response process validity and validity by relation to other variables was performed using regression models.

Results

Fifty-four assessments were recorded during the study period, conducted on 23 trainees by 13 faculty. Content validity of the tool was demonstrated using expert consensus and published guidelines from critical care societies to define the EPAs. Response process validity was demonstrated by the low variance in entrustment scores due to evaluators (0.086 or 6%) and high agreement between score and trainee self-assessment (regression coefficient, 0.82; P < 0.0001). Reliability was demonstrated by the high "true" variance in entrustment score attributable to the trainee: 0.674 or 45%. Validity by relation to other variables was demonstrated using regression analysis to show correlation between entrustment score and the number of times a fellow has performed an EPA (regression coefficient, 0.023; P < 0.0001).

Conclusion

An EPA-based assessment tool for competence in CCUS was created. We obtained sufficient validity evidence on three of the diagnostic EPAs. Procedural EPAs were infrequently assessed, limiting generalizability in this subgroup.

'Next steps are…': An exploration of coaching and feedback language in EPA assessment comments

PURPOSE

Entrustable Professional Activities (EPA) assessments are intended to facilitate meaningful, low-stakes coaching and feedback, partly through the provision of written comments. We sought to explore EPA assessment comments provided to internal medicine (IM) residents for evidence of feedback and coaching language as well as politeness.

METHODS

We collected all written comments from EPA assessments of communication from a first-year IM resident cohort at the University of Toronto. Sensitized by politeness theory, we analyzed data using principles of constructivist grounded theory.

RESULTS

Nearly all EPA assessments (94%) contained written feedback based on focused clinical encounters. The majority of comments demonstrated coaching language, including phrases like 'don't forget to,' and 'next steps are,' followed by specific suggestions for improvement. A variety of words, including 'autonomy' and 'independence' denoted entrustment decisions. Linguistic politeness strategies such as hedging were pervasive, seemingly to minimize harm to the supervisor-trainee relationship.

CONCLUSION

Evidence of written coaching feedback suggests that EPA assessment comments are being used as intended as a means of formative feedback to promote learning. Yet, the frequent use of polite language suggests that EPAs may be higher-stakes than expected, highlighting a need for changes to the assessment culture and improved feedback literacy.

WBAs in UME-How Many Are Needed? A Reliability Analysis of 5 AAMC Core EPAs Implemented in the Internal Medicine Clerkship

BACKGROUND

Reliable assessments of clinical skills are important for undergraduate medical education, trustworthy handoffs to graduate medical programs, and safe, effective patient care. Entrustable professional activities (EPAs) for entering residency have been developed; research is needed to assess reliability of such assessments in authentic clinical workspaces.

DESIGN

A student-driven mobile assessment platform was developed and used for clinical supervisors to record ad hoc entrustment decisions using the modified Ottawa scale on 5 core EPAs in an 8-week internal medicine (IM) clerkship. After a 12-month period, generalizability (G) theory analysis was performed to estimate the reliability of entrustment scores and determine the proportion of variance attributable to the student and the other facets, including particular EPA, evaluator type (attending versus resident), or case complexity. Decision (D) theory analysis determined the expected reliability based on the number of hypothetical observations. A g-coefficient of 0.7 was used as a generally agreed upon minimum reliability threshold.

KEY RESULTS

A total of 1368 ratings over the 5 EPAs were completed on 94 students. Variance attributed to person (true variance) was high for all EPAs; EPA-5 had the lowest person variance (9.8% across cases and four blocks). Across cases, reliability ranged from 0.02 to 0.60. Applying this to the Decision study, the estimated number of observations needed to reach a reliability index of 0.7 ranged between 9 and 11 for all EPAs except EPA5 which was sensitive to case complexity.

CONCLUSIONS

Work place-based clinical skills in IM clerkship students were assessed and logged using a convenient mobile platform. Our analysis suggests that 9-11 observations are needed for these EPA workplace-based assessments (WBAs) to achieve a reliability index of 0.7. Note writing was very sensitive to case complexity. Further reliability analyses of core EPAs are needed before US medical schools consider wider adoption into summative entrustment processes and GME handoffs.

Competency-based medical education across the continuum: How well aligned are medical school EPAs to residency milestones?

INTRODUCTION

Competency-based medical education (CBME) provides a framework for describing learner progression throughout training. However, specific approaches to CBME implementation vary widely across educational settings. Alignment between various methods used across the continuum is critical to support transitions and assess learner performance. The purpose of this study was to investigate alignment between CBME frameworks used in undergraduate medical education (UME) and graduate medical education (GME) settings using the US context as a model.

METHOD

The authors analyzed content from the core entrustable professional activities for entering residency (Core EPAs; UME model) and residency milestones (GME model). From that analysis, they performed a series of cross-walk activities to investigate alignment between frameworks. After independent review, authors discussed findings until consensus was reached.

RESULTS

Some alignment was found for activities associated with history taking, physical examination, differential diagnosis, patient safety, and interprofessional care; however, there were far more examples of misalignment.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings highlight challenges creating alignment of assessment frameworks across the continuum of training. The importance of these findings includes implications for assessment and persistence of the educational gap across UME and GME. The authors provide four next steps to improve upon the continuum of education.

A Question of Scale? Generalizability of the Ottawa and Chen Scales to Render Entrustment Decisions for the Core EPAs in the Workplace

PURPOSE

Assessments of the Core Entrustable Professional Activities (Core EPAs) are based on observations of supervisors throughout a medical student's progression toward entrustment. The purpose of this study was to compare generalizability of scores from 2 entrustment scales: the Ottawa Surgical Competency Operating Room Evaluation (Ottawa) scale and an undergraduate medical education supervisory scale proposed by Chen and colleagues (Chen). A secondary aim was to determine the impact of frequent assessors on generalizability of the data.

METHOD

For academic year 2019-2020, the Virginia Commonwealth University School of Medicine modified a previously described workplace-based assessment (WBA) system developed to provide feedback for the Core EPAs across clerkships. The WBA scored students' performance using both Ottawa and Chen scales. Generalizability (G) and decision (D) studies were performed using an unbalanced random-effects model to determine the reliability of each scale. Secondary G- and D-studies explored whether faculty who rated more than 5 students demonstrated better reliability. The Phi-coefficient was used to estimate reliability; a cutoff of at least 0.70 was used to conduct D-studies.

RESULTS

Using the Ottawa scale, variability attributable to the student ranged from 0.8% to 6.5%. For the Chen scale, student variability ranged from 1.8% to 7.1%. This indicates the majority of variation was due to the rater (42.8%-61.3%) and other unexplained factors. Between 28 and 127 assessments were required to obtain a Phi-coefficient of 0.70. For 2 EPAs, using faculty who frequently assessed the EPA improved generalizability, requiring only 5 and 13 assessments for the Chen scale.

CONCLUSIONS

Both scales performed poorly in terms of learner-attributed variance, with some improvement in 2 EPAs when considering only frequent assessors using the Chen scale. Based on these findings in conjunction with prior evidence, the authors provide a root cause analysis highlighting challenges with WBAs for Core EPAs.

Entrustment Decision Making in the Core Entrustable Professional Activities: Results of a Multi-Institutional Study

PURPOSE

In 2014, the Association of American Medical Colleges defined 13 Core Entrustable Professional Activities (EPAs) that all graduating students should be ready to do with indirect supervision upon entering residency and commissioned a 10-school, 5-year pilot to test implementing the Core EPAs framework. In 2019, pilot schools convened trained entrustment groups (TEGs) to review assessment data and render theoretical summative entrustment decisions for class of 2019 graduates. Results were examined to determine the extent to which entrustment decisions could be made and the nature of these decisions.

METHOD

For each EPA considered (4-13 per student), TEGs recorded an entrustment determination (ready, progressing but not yet ready, evidence against student progressing, could not make a decision); confidence in that determination (none, low, moderate, high); and the number of workplace-based assessments (WBAs) considered (0->15) per determination. These individual student-level data were de-identified and merged into a multischool database; chi-square analysis tested the significance of associations between variables.

RESULTS

The 2,415 EPA-specific determinations (for 349 students by 4 participating schools) resulted in a decision of ready (n = 997/2,415; 41.3%), progressing but not yet ready (n = 558/2,415; 23.1%), or evidence against student progression (n = 175/2,415; 7.2%). No decision could be made for the remaining 28.4% (685/2,415), generally for lack of data. Entrustment determinations' distribution varied across EPAs (chi-square P < .001) and, for 10/13 EPAs, WBA availability was associated with making (vs not making) entrustment decisions (each chi-square P < .05).

CONCLUSIONS

TEGs were able to make many decisions about readiness for indirect supervision; yet less than half of determinations resulted in a decision of readiness to perform this EPA with indirect supervision. More work is needed at the 10 schools to enable authentic summative entrustment in the Core EPAs framework.

Core EPAs in the Acting Internship: Early Outcomes from an Interdepartmental Experience

INTRODUCTION

The Core Entrustable Professional Activities for Entering Residency (Core EPAs) are clinical activities all interns should be able to perform on the first day of residency with indirect supervision. The acting (sub) internship (AI) rotation provides medical students the opportunity to be assessed on advanced Core EPAs.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

All fourth-year AI students were taught Core EPA skills and performed these clinical skills under direct supervision. Formative feedback and direct observation data were provided via required workplace-based assessments (WBAs). Supervising physicians rated learner performance using the Ottawa Clinic Assessment Tool (OCAT). WBA and pre-post student self-assessment data were analyzed to assess student performance and gauge curriculum efficacy.

RESULTS

In the 2017-2018 academic year, 167 students completed two AI rotations at our institution. By their last WBA, 91.2% of students achieved a target OCAT supervisory scale rating for both patient handoffs and calling consults. Paired sample t tests of the student pre-post surveys showed statistically significant improvement in self-efficacy on key clinical functions of the EPAs.

DISCUSSION

This study demonstrates that the AI rotation can be structured to include a Core EPA curriculum that can assess student performance utilizing WBAs of directly observed clinical skills.

CONCLUSIONS

Our clinical outcomes data demonstrates that the majority of fourth-year medical students are capable of performing advanced Core EPAs at a level acceptable for intern year by the conclusion of their AI rotations. WBA data collected can also aid in ad hoc and longitudinal summative Core EPA entrustment decisions.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40670-021-01208-y.