Content of an Educational Handover Letter From Medical Schools to Surgery Residencies: A Mixed Method Analysis

Novice Experts: Exploring Fellows' Perspectives on the Transition from Residency to Fellowship

Introduction

Advanced training experiences are required in certain countries for subspecialization. In the United States, a decline in Milestones and in levels of supervision for Entrustable Professional Activities for incoming subspecialty fellows has been described and attributed to changes in context that fellows experience. We aimed to explore this transition to advanced training, and specifically to describe which contextual factors are salient to fellows at the residency to fellowship transition and the supports available for a smooth transition to fellowship.

Methods

Using contextual competence as a sensitizing concept, ten semi-structured interviews with first- and second-year pediatric subspecialty fellows from three subspecialties were performed at a large academic medical center in 2023, using thematic analysis informed by elements of constructivist grounded theory.

Results

Contextual factors that impacted the transition included changes in systems, necessary knowledge, and roles and responsibilities. At times, participants describe a tension between feeling like novices while simultaneously feeling like they should have more expertise than they had. Supports in navigating this tension, and in navigating the transition more generally, included formal orientations, fellow behaviors and perspective, and input from others.

Conclusions

The transition to advanced training is characterized, at times, by experiencing tension between feeling like a novice while feeling like one should have expertise, with fellows' own behaviors and the support of those around them being essential to fellows' smooth transition. While fellowship programs offer orientations, systems-level solutions for supporting fellows' navigation of the transition are underexplored.

The Inconspicuous Learner Handover: An Exploratory Study of U.S. Emergency Medicine Program Directors' Perceptions of Learner Handovers from Medical School to Residency

Phenomenon: Central to competency-based medical education is the need for a seamless developmental continuum of training and practice. Trainees currently experience significant discontinuity in the transition from undergraduate (UME) to graduate medical education (GME). The learner handover is intended to smooth this transition, but little is known about how well this is working from the GME perspective. In an attempt to gather preliminary evidence, this study explores U.S. program directors (PDs) perspective of the learner handover from UME to GME. Approach: Using exploratory qualitative methodology, we conducted semi-structured interviews with 12 Emergency Medicine PDs within the U.S. from October to November, 2020. We asked participants to describe their current perception of the learner handover from UME to GME. Then we performed thematic analysis using an inductive approach. Findings: We identified two main themes: The inconspicuous learner handover and barrier to creating a successful UME to GME learner handover. PDs described the current state of the learner handover as "nonexistent," yet acknowledged that information is transmitted from UME to GME. Participants also highlighted key challenges preventing a successful learner handover from UME to GME. These included: conflicting expectations, issues of trust and transparency, and a dearth of assessment data to actually hand over. Insights: PDs highlight the inconspicuous nature of learner handovers, suggesting that assessment information is not shared in the way it should be in the transition from UME to GME. Challenges with the learner handover demonstrate a lack of trust, transparency, and explicit communication between UME and GME. Our findings can inform how national organizations establish a unified approach to transmitting growth-oriented assessment data and formalize transparent learner handovers from UME to GME.

The Surgical Subinternship: A Unique Opportunity for Early Leadership Development

Subinternships are formative rotations in the surgery-bound medical student's journey to surgical training. This experience allows for further exploration of career goals, plays an important evaluative role in the residency selection process, and offers ongoing opportunities for technical and non-technical development. The graduated responsibility experienced in this setting extends beyond what was experienced during the core surgical clerkship where students are first interfacing with the clinical environment. We review and reflect on the role of subinternships in developing the leadership skills that surgery-bound medical students will need to effectively lead interprofessional healthcare teams in the future.

The American College of Surgeons Entering Resident Readiness Assessment (ACS ERRA): Validity Evidence From a Three-Year National Study

OBJECTIVE

To gather validity evidence supporting the use and interpretation of scores from the American College of Surgeons Entering Resident Readiness Assessment (ACS ERRA) Program.

SUMMARY AND BACKGROUND DATA

ACS ERRA is an online formative assessment program developed to assess entering surgery residents' ability to make critical clinical decisions, and includes 12 clinical areas and 20 topics identified by a national panel of surgeon educators and residency program directors.

METHODS

Data from 3 national testing administrations of ACS ERRA (2018-2020) were used to gather validity evidence regarding content, response process, internal structure (reliability), relations to other variables, and consequences.

RESULTS

Over the 3 administrations, 1975 surgery residents participated from 125 distinct residency programs. Overall scores [Mean = 64% (SD = 7%)] remained consistent across the 3 years ( P = 0.670). There were no significant differences among resident characteristics (gender, age, international medical graduate status). The mean case discrimination index was 0.54 [SD = 0.15]. Kappa inter-rater reliability for scoring was 0.87; the overall test score reliability (G-coefficient) was 0.86 (Ф-coefficient = 0.83). Residents who completed residency readiness programs had higher ACS ERRA scores (66% versus 63%, Cohen's d = 0.23, P < 0.001). On average, 15% of decisions made (21/140 per test) involved potentially harmful actions. Variability in scores from graduating medical schools (7%) carried over twice as much weight than from matched residency programs (3%).

CONCLUSIONS

ACS ERRA scores provide valuable information to entering surgery residents and surgery program directors to aid in development of individual and group learning plans.

Oral examination of fourth-year medical students on surgery rotations allows faculty to assess Core Entrustable Professional Activities for entering Residency (CEPAR): Proof-of-concept and analysis of student submissions

BACKGROUND

As a community-based medical school which recruited faculty preceptors new to teaching, we sought to create objective assessments for fourth-year surgery experiences via administration of an oral exam. Students provided three authentic cases, which faculty used as a springboard to ascertain student proficiency in five entrustable professional activities: 1-oral presentation, 2-recognition of urgency/instability, 3-calling consults, 4-transitions of care, 5-informed consent. We present proof-of-concept and analysis of student case submissions.

METHODS

Twenty-seven student submissions (79 cases in total) were evaluated for case complexity, level-appropriateness, and an estimation of the ability to conduct a quality exam based on the information provided (subjective measures). Objective metrics included word count, instruction adherence, inclusion of figures/captions. A resident-in-training rated cases via the same metrics. In-examination data was separately culled.

RESULTS

The average word count was 281.70 (SD 140.23; range 40-743). Figures were included in 26.1% of cases. Faculty raters scored 29.0% as low-complexity, 37.7% medium-complexity, and 33.3% high-complexity. Raters felt 62.3% of cases provided enough information to conduct a quality exam. The majority of cases submitted (65.2%) were level-appropriate or higher. The resident rater scored cases more favorably than surgeons (Cohen's kappa of -0.5), suggesting low inter-rater agreement between those of differing experience levels.

CONCLUSION

Student's case submissions lessened faculty burden and provided assessors with adequate information to deliver a quality exam to assess proficiency in clinical skills essential for residency. Cases demonstrated sufficient complexity and level-appropriateness. The request to correlate case rating with exam performance is under review by our institution's assessment office. Near-peer tutoring by resident alumni is a program under development.

Disruption and Dissonance: Exploring Constructive Tensions Within Research in Medical Education

The academic medicine community has experienced an unprecedented level of disruption in recent years. In this context, the authors consider how the disruptions have impacted the state of research in medical education (RIME). The articles in this year's RIME supplement reflect several constructive tensions that provide insight on future for the field. In this commentary, the authors discuss themes and propose a framework for the future. Recommendations include: normalizing help seeking during times of disruption and uncertainty, contextualizing the application of complex approaches to assessment, advancing and problematizing innovation, and recognizing the deeply embedded and systemic nature of inequities.